Re: [css-d] Accessibility and font sizing

2005-08-31 Thread Bob Easton

Scott Glasgow wrote:

...
This brings up a question I have been wondering about. What is the 
consensus

(if there is a consensus :-) on the best way to provide resizable
(accessible) text while still permitting reasonably consistent layout
without torturous CSS? Font-size keywords? Relative sizes? ...


Extreme caution: there be tigers here.

Search the CSS-Discuss archives (1) and you will find numerous flame 
wars on the font sizing issue.  To avoid repeating same, there's a good 
bit of reference material in our WIKI (2)(3).


Several methods of using relative sizes work very well and are described 
at the places mentioned in the WIKI.  One recent technique, which I just 
added to the WIKI (3), is Joe Clark's ZOOM technique which offers 
multiple style sheets and a preferencer setting mechanism (4).


(1) http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=SearchCssDiscussList
(2) http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
(3) http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=FontSize
(4) http://www.alistapart.com/articles/lowvision
--
Bob Easton
Accessibility Matters: http://access-matters.com

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Accessibility and font sizing

2005-08-30 Thread Scott Glasgow

Felix Miata wrote:
::SNIP::

Small equals approximately 88.75%, so the result due to the cascade is
the p text is 88.75% X 80% X 90%, or 63.9%. To the poor IE user
already requiring larger or largest text in the first place,
you're making it (unless a rare user who knows how to locate and
select ignore font sizes specified on web pages) impossible to make
comfortably large enough to read if large enough to read at all:
http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/SS/crysanct2.png

::SNIP::

This brings up a question I have been wondering about. What is the consensus
(if there is a consensus :-) on the best way to provide resizable
(accessible) text while still permitting reasonably consistent layout
without torturous CSS? Font-size keywords? Relative sizes? I've found and
read some online resources on the subject and I believe that I would lean
toward font-size keywords, but I'm interested in finding if there are more
reasons to choose a different method which I haven't encountered.

Cheers,
Scott

__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/