Re: [css-d] Divitus?

2010-04-05 Thread tedd
At 12:11 PM -0400 4/2/10, Climis, Tim wrote:
   I'm not familiar with the '8 div flexy box'. Could someone provide a URI?

That's not it's official name, and I'm not sure what is, but you can 
see an example I did a few weeks ago here: http://sunapsis.iu.edu/

I don't know what the official name would be, or who would officially 
name it, but I called mine simple box:

http://sperling.com/examples/box/

Cheers,

tedd

-- 
---
http://sperling.com  http://ancientstones.com  http://earthstones.com
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Divitus?

2010-04-02 Thread Climis, Tim
 I'm not familiar with the '8 div flexy box'. Could someone provide a URI?

That's not it's official name, and I'm not sure what is, but you can see an 
example I did a few weeks ago here: http://sunapsis.iu.edu/

Essentially, you have a relatively positioned content box (my #container), and 
then 8 decorative, empty, absolutely positioned divs (my .border divs), for a 
page that can stretch in both directions. Top, bottom, left, right, and the 
four corners.

It doesn't work in IE6 particularly well, I think because that browser doesn't 
handle the bottom and right properties, but I don't recall exactly.

Ooh.  Checking through this though, I apparently forgot to put in an 
inline-block fix for ie7.  Ah well.

---Tim

__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


[css-d] Divitus?

2010-04-01 Thread T. R. Valentine
Is this a case of divitus?
http://home.comcast.net/~t.r.valentine/testing/

There are six divss for the overall background image plus one for
the bookmark image (which I foresee using for a menu). Too much? Is
there a simpler way of accomplishing the same thing? I like the
layout's flexibility (the background adjusts to the amount of text
lengthwise and widthwise, but is never shorter than a bit past the
bookmark image).

Any help/suggestions appreciated.

-- 
T. R. Valentine
Your friends will argue with you. Your enemies don't care.
'When I get a little money I buy books; and if any is left I buy food
and clothes.' -- Erasmus
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Divitus?

2010-04-01 Thread Tim Climis
On Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:06:52 pm T. R. Valentine wrote:
 Is this a case of divitus?
 http://home.comcast.net/~t.r.valentine/testing/
 
 There are six divss for the overall background image plus one for
 the bookmark image (which I foresee using for a menu). Too much? Is
 there a simpler way of accomplishing the same thing? I like the
 layout's flexibility (the background adjusts to the amount of text
 lengthwise and widthwise, but is never shorter than a bit past the
 bookmark image).
 
 Any help/suggestions appreciated.

This isn't too bad, really.  The 6 empty divs are all serving a unique purpose 
that couldn't be served by anything less.  The 8 div flexy box (which this is 
just a variant of) is fairly well established.

But you could remove at least one div, maybe two, elsewhere.

#header could go away.  if you increase the bottom padding on the h1 and set 
the background color on it instead, you get the exact same effect.

The bookmark div could be changed to a ul instead, if you're planning on 
putting a menu (and only a menu) in it.  If you want to have multiple things 
in there, keep the div.

The other thing you might do is set a max-width on the content.  In a 
maximized browser window at 1280x1024, the lines get too long to be 
comfortably readable.

---Tim
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/


Re: [css-d] Divitus?

2010-04-01 Thread Felix Miata
On 2010/04/01 22:33 (GMT-0400) Tim Climis composed:

 On Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:06:52 pm T. R. Valentine wrote:

 Is this a case of divitus?
 http://home.comcast.net/~t.r.valentine/testing/

 The other thing you might do is set a max-width on the content.  In a 
 maximized browser window at 1280x1024, the lines get too long to be 
 comfortably readable.

I agree, except that screen resolution is irrelevant. As long as the
visitor's default font size is reasonably set for whatever his resolution is,
then a maximized browser will almost invariably produce too long lines when
allowed to fill most of the screen width.
http://webstyleguide.com/wsg3/8-typography/3-legibility.html has a decent
section on line length, an important component of most designs.
-- 
Suppos [sic] a nation in some distant region, should
take the Bible for their only law book, and every member
should regulate his conduct by the precepts there
exhibited. . . . What a Eutopa, What a paradise would
this region be!John Adams, 2nd US President

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/