Re: [css-d] It is now clear
On Jun 8, 2015, at 5:28 AM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote: On Sunday, June 7, 2015, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote: On Jun 7, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote: Ok, sorry if this is spam, It has become clear to me what the.. style type=text/css .clear { clear:both; } style div class=clear/div ..does now. I recommend this: /* CLEARING */ /* For modern browsers */ .clear:before, .clear:after {content: ; display:block;} .clear:after {clear:both;} .clear {zoom:1;}/* For IE 6/7 (trigger hasLayout) */ and it's applied as such: div class=clear div class=floatleft/div div class=floatright/div /div This saves you from having an extra element in your HTML for just clearing purposes. Some nice info here: http://www.sitepoint.com/clearing-floats-overview-different-clearfix-methods/ -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com Putting class clear on the wrapper container did not do it for me or there was some other reason in the way, but the extra element did it. I will try your approach though as it seem to cover the gamut. Thanks Tom! Best, Karl DeSaulniers Odd. A link would help. -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com Oh, no need. It was more about my understanding of the clear. That instance was long ago. It ended up teaching me that what I was doing at the time with my floats was wrong and forced me to reasses how to approach it. The current project I am working on and trying of the extra clear element is what prompted (finally) the realization of how that all worked. So no debugging necessary. :) Thanks for your input though. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] It is now clear
On Sunday, June 7, 2015, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote: On Jun 7, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com javascript:; wrote: Ok, sorry if this is spam, It has become clear to me what the.. style type=text/css .clear { clear:both; } style div class=clear/div ..does now. I recommend this: /* CLEARING */ /* For modern browsers */ .clear:before, .clear:after {content: ; display:block;} .clear:after {clear:both;} .clear {zoom:1;}/* For IE 6/7 (trigger hasLayout) */ and it's applied as such: div class=clear div class=floatleft/div div class=floatright/div /div This saves you from having an extra element in your HTML for just clearing purposes. Some nice info here: http://www.sitepoint.com/clearing-floats-overview-different-clearfix-methods/ -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com Putting class clear on the wrapper container did not do it for me or there was some other reason in the way, but the extra element did it. I will try your approach though as it seem to cover the gamut. Thanks Tom! Best, Karl DeSaulniers Odd. A link would help. -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com #663399 __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] It is now clear
I was thinking this was irrelevant in the present. The page(s) main container must have contained within the borders of the main container of the page the following ? div class=clear div class=floatleft/div div class=floatright/div /div Tom Livingston mailto:tom...@gmail.com Monday, June 08, 2015 6:28 AM Odd. A link would help. Karl DeSaulniers mailto:k...@designdrumm.com Sunday, June 07, 2015 10:16 PM Putting class clear on the wrapper container did not do it for me or there was some other reason in the way, but the extra element did it. I will try your approach though as it seem to cover the gamut. Thanks Tom! Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ Tom Livingston mailto:tom...@gmail.com Sunday, June 07, 2015 9:48 PM I recommend this: /* CLEARING */ /* For modern browsers */ .clear:before, .clear:after {content: ; display:block;} .clear:after {clear:both;} .clear {zoom:1;}/* For IE 6/7 (trigger hasLayout) */ and it's applied as such: div class=clear div class=floatleft/div div class=floatright/div /div This saves you from having an extra element in your HTML for just clearing purposes. Some nice info here: http://www.sitepoint.com/clearing-floats-overview-different-clearfix-methods/ Karl DeSaulniers mailto:k...@designdrumm.com Sunday, June 07, 2015 9:19 PM Ok, sorry if this is spam, It has become clear to me what the.. style type=text/css .clear { clear:both; } style div class=clear/div ..does now. For anyone else having trouble deciphering what this is and how to implement, think of it like this. We all have that situation where a wrapper div doesn't wrap the contents and the contents flow past the bottom of the wrapper div. Very unpleasant to say the least. Well, at the end of the content code (inside the wrapper div) is where this div class=clear/div or p class=clear or br class=clear / (whatever class=clear) goes and it keeps your content from flowing outside your wrapper div if you have any floats or special layout stuff on the contents preceding. There are many other implementations and reasonings for using this I'm sure, but this one turned the light switch for me. Hope this helps the novice.. :) Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] It is now clear
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Crest Christopher crestchristop...@gmail.com wrote: I was thinking this was irrelevant in the present. The page(s) main container must have contained within the borders of the main container of the page the following ? div class=clear div class=floatleft/div div class=floatright/div /div I do not understand your question. The code above represents a container with 2 siblings that are floating left and right. In my original reply, I included CSS for the class clear which will cause the container to clear itself with out the use of additional, needless (IMHO) HTML elements. The above could be occurring many times within a single webpage. It is not just the main page structure, though it would work for that as well. -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com #663399 __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] It is now clear
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote: Ok, sorry if this is spam, It has become clear to me what the.. style type=text/css .clear { clear:both; } style div class=clear/div ..does now. I recommend this: /* CLEARING */ /* For modern browsers */ .clear:before, .clear:after {content: ; display:block;} .clear:after {clear:both;} .clear {zoom:1;}/* For IE 6/7 (trigger hasLayout) */ and it's applied as such: div class=clear div class=floatleft/div div class=floatright/div /div This saves you from having an extra element in your HTML for just clearing purposes. Some nice info here: http://www.sitepoint.com/clearing-floats-overview-different-clearfix-methods/ -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com #663399 __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
Re: [css-d] It is now clear
On Jun 7, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Tom Livingston tom...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote: Ok, sorry if this is spam, It has become clear to me what the.. style type=text/css .clear { clear:both; } style div class=clear/div ..does now. I recommend this: /* CLEARING */ /* For modern browsers */ .clear:before, .clear:after {content: ; display:block;} .clear:after {clear:both;} .clear {zoom:1;}/* For IE 6/7 (trigger hasLayout) */ and it's applied as such: div class=clear div class=floatleft/div div class=floatright/div /div This saves you from having an extra element in your HTML for just clearing purposes. Some nice info here: http://www.sitepoint.com/clearing-floats-overview-different-clearfix-methods/ -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front End Developer | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | medialogic.com Putting class clear on the wrapper container did not do it for me or there was some other reason in the way, but the extra element did it. I will try your approach though as it seem to cover the gamut. Thanks Tom! Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/