[CTRL] Conclusive proof: Wyoming Sheriff Story is a Hoax

2000-01-22 Thread True Patriot

-Caveat Lector-   A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"
/A -Cui Bono?-

PLEASE circulate as far and wide as the hoax story.

Well the jig is up.
I spoke with Sheriff Mattis on the telephone yesterday, Friday 21 January
2000.
VERY pleasant guy. At first.

I told him I had seen all over the infomation about the "case" and/or
"settlement" and that I'd like a copy of the final settlement that specified
the statement(s) that have been quoted.
HE WOULD NOT PROVIDE IT.
He asked where I was from. I responded that had little to do with the issue
at hand but that I was from Maryland just the same. He responded in a very
clear and calm manner that since I was clearly not a citizen of Wyoming he
was under no obligation to assist me. I thought he was worried that with a
big file of the case it would be expensive. I offered to send him via check,
money order or wire a total of 50 dollars to cover any and all expenses and
that should it cost more that I would be more than happy to submit further
funds. At this point he became rude and I was told that he would not help
since I was not a citizen of Wyoming. He then asked if I worked for a
federal agency, since I live in Maryland and was making calls about this
issue. I told him I wasn't. Realizing that this was going to get me nowhere,
I decided to hang up.

If there is ANYONE who gets this and is in fact from Wyoming, PLEASE submit
immediately a Freedom of Information Law/Act request to this man's office.
In any case, it looks like when it came time to put up or shut up, "Sheriff"
Mattis decided to shut up.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] FWD: Mattis is a Hoax

2000-01-22 Thread True Patriot

Note: Please follow the links and notice that the story HAS KEPT ON
CHANGING. And as was pointed out, Mattis CAN NOT and/or WILL NOT provide a
copy of the "settlement" or the "court order" or whatever. Chalk one more up
to urban (or would this be rural) legend.

--Original Message--
From: "Steve Washam"
To: APFN ONELIST
Sent: January 22, 2000 9:09:09 PM GMT
Subject: [apfn] (Fwd) CHECK FACTS re: WYOMING SHERIFFS


From: "Steve Washam"


The commentary referenced below:

Incrementalism on steroids

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_metcalf/2117_xcgme_incrementa.shtml


--- Forwarded Message Follows ---
From:   "Steve Washam"
To: "Geoff Metcalf"
Date sent:  Sat, 22 Jan 2000 11:15:35 -0800
Subject:CHECK FACTS re: WYOMING SHERIFFS
Copies to:  "WND News Team bcc"

Mr. Metcalf,

One of the things I love about WorldNetDaily is the way
reporters check their facts and contact original sources
before going "live" with a story.  Unfortunately, your
recent commentary of January 17, 2000 was an exception to
the rule.

There are some wonderful things happening in Big Horn
County which indeed should receive better exposure.
However, by re-posting what is essentially internet rumors
the cause of truth suffers -- not just for you, but for
everyone associated with your outlets and the effort for
freedom and local control.

Here is the source for the material you used, without
checking facts for yourself:

http://www.cybersurf.co.uk/~johnny/sbt/wyoming.html

Here are two additional articles about the same situation,
also from 1997:

http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/Shores/4190/fedsout.htm

http://www.valint.net/php/sew/can/CAN00010.TXT

You will note that although they all purport to deal with
the same situation, the facts are reported differently.  My
suspicion is that the first report listed above, the one
which generated so much interest when recirculated
recently, is somewhat embellished.

It always amazes me how much interest is generated when the
local control option comes up, but how little people are
willing to do to come up with documented facts.

Thanks for reading.

Steve Washam
County Action





_
"I tolerate with the utmost latitude the right of
others to differ from me in opinion"
Thomas Jefferson

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.!"
 Hosea 4:6
or
"There ain't no knowledge in the SECOND kick from a mule!"
 APFN ADVISOR

American Patriot Friends Network (APFN)
http://www.esotericworldnews.com/pledge.jpg
APFN EMAIL LIST SUBSCRIBE/UNSCBSCRIBE IN SUBJECT LINE TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
APFN ONELIST: http://www.onelist/subscribe.cgi/apfn
APFN CONTENTS: http://www.esotericworldnews.com/apfncont.htm
APFN MSG BOARD: http://www.insidetheweb.com/mbs.cgi/mb77532

The Judicial Accountability Initiative Law
http://www.jail4judges.org/

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001








Please click above to support our sponsor







Re: [CTRL] Who Owns Knowledge?

2000-01-19 Thread True Patriot

-Caveat Lector-   A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"
/A -Cui Bono?-

The US ministry of justice ceded publication rights in federal laws to West
Publishing...

This happy little myth is crap.
There is an argument floating around the freedom movement that the "law" is
copyrighted, which is
utterly crazy. The "Law" is owned by the public and cannot be copyrighted.
Back in 1834, two reporters
for the U.S. Supreme Court got involved in a legal battle over the cases of
the Supreme Court. In
Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Pet. 591, 668, 33 U.S. 591 (1834), the Supreme Court
declared that "no reporter ...
can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this court".
Decisions of the courts belong to
the public and nobody can copyright those decisions.

West Publishing Company, one of the largest publishers of legal materials,
knows that it cannot
copyright cases. It places in its electronic versions of the cases the
following caveat:

"Copyright (c) West Group 1998  No claim to original U.S. Govt. works
952 F.Supp. 647, McCann v. Greenway, (W.D.Mo. 1997)

"Copyright (c) West Group 1998  No claim to original U.S. Govt. works
974 F.Supp. 1411, Sadlier v. Payne, (D.Utah 1997)"

But what about statutes? This is addressed in 17 U.S.C. §105: "Subject
matter of copyright: United
States Government works:"

"Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the
United States Government,
but the United States Government is not precluded from receiving and holding
copyrights transferred
to it by assignment, bequest, or otherwise."

Those arguing that the "law is copyrighted" are utterly wrong. But this
argument is an important part of
the argument for those who promote the grand theory that "we are still
subjects of the British crown"
under the apparent contention that the "King" (or Queen Elizabeth) still
today "owns" the law.

As shown above, public documents belong to the public and cannot be
copyrighted. When any court
decides any case, anyone may go obtain a copy of that decision. I can get
any decision, you can and West
Publishing can. I may, you may and West does publish those cases. I could
start  my own company
publishing these cases and making them available to whoever would buy them.
However, I doubt that I
would stay in business long against West. It has hundreds of people employed
by it who get these cases,
read them, and make little "headnotes" about various legal points in the
cases. It publishes these cases in
nicely bound books. It takes the "headnotes" it generates for these cases
and puts them into a legal
encyclopedias which group all "headnotes" of all cases in specific
categories. Using West, studying and
finding "law" has been made a lot easier.

West also has a competitor, Lawyers Co-op. The federal government publishes
acts of Congress in a
set of books called the Statutes at Large ("Stat."). In large university
libraries, you can find the Statutes at
Large. However, the feds also publish the United States Code, which is
simply stated the Statutes at Large
organized in a more methodical fashion via titles. You can find the "true
blue" (but it is really red in color)
U.S. Code in many libraries. However, since the Code is a public document,
anybody can copy it. Here,
West and Lawyers Co-op are fierce competitors, with one publishing USCA and
the other USCS. Both
contain accurate reprints of the various uncopyrightable sections and titles
of the official U.S. Code.
However, West employs hundreds of people who read and categorize cases. West
puts summaries of
many cases at the end of sections of the U.S. Code, so when you engage in
legal research, cases regarding
a specific statute are there at your fingertips. Lawyers Co-op does the same
thing. All of this other writing
in these versions of the Code was created by these companies and this is the
material which is copyrighted
in these books.

I never use the official U.S. Code and neither does anyone else. It just
sits up there on the top shelf in
our local law library gathering dust. The reason nobody uses the official
version is because of the absence
of the handy research materials like case summaries and other references. If
I have a conspiracy case, I
pull USCS, turn to Title 18, U.S.C., § 371, and start reading the very
refined annotations at the end of the
section which quickly point you to the relevant cases. It wasn't always this
way, however. Years ago, the
states officially published their own legal materials, cases and codes and
West was the competitor. As time
passed, West acquired dominant market share because its books were superior.
Legislatures would
appropriate funds for official case books, which were often large, expensive
books with large print. West
published smaller books with smaller print and its publications were
obviously cheaper. Why would
anyone buy from the state its publication of the cases when (for probably
the same price) you could buy
from West its regional reporter containing cases not only from 

Re: [CTRL] Homo Teacher Charged with Having Sex with a Minor

2000-01-19 Thread True Patriot

-Caveat Lector-   A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"
/A -Cui Bono?-

BUT I don't think that they're ALL guilty of the described crime, nor do I
think\ MOST of them would perpetuate such an act...

Shhh! Don't you know all homosexuals are sitting around planning how to
molest all kids?

for every homo-rape like this there are HUNDREDS of guy teachers doing
similar things to little girls...

And as Mary Kay Loturneau (sp?) has shown female teachers go after male
students sometimes too.

If THAT represents a lifestyle too ta' you then at least you're
intellectually honest...but I doubt you'd cop to that.

Having sex with little girls and little boys is a lifestyle: a criminal one.
Whatever the circumstances teachers should NOT have sex with students. But
of course, you'll never see from the person who posted this the cases of
heterosexual teachers molesting kids. As you pointed out, this is
intellectual dishonesty.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Homo Teacher Charged with Having Sex with a Minor

2000-01-19 Thread True Patriot

-Caveat Lector-   A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"
/A -Cui Bono?-

Let us all be vigilant in monitoring the extent of the "establishment media
thugs" coverage of this story.

Let's also see if it gets more or less coverage than when heterosexual
teachers molest kids.
THAT would be the better barometer.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Homo Teacher Charged with Having Sex with a Minor

2000-01-19 Thread True Patriot

And if the story was about the heterosexual rape of a female student by a
male teacher, you'd be here making as big a fuss about it as this? Who are
you kidding? If the issue was RAPE, who cares if it was homosexual or
heterosexual? The ONLY issue at hand is a teacher taking advantage of a
student. I don't care what the specific plumbing of the participants was:
the teacher should sit behind bars and the student should remain anonymous
(I am a 100% believer that the names of a child victim should be sealed and
whatever reporter pusblishes it should rot in hell or a prison cell under a
contmept charge for awhile.)

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001


At 12:51 AM 1/20/00 , you wrote:
-Caveat Lector- A
HREF=http://www.ctrl.org/
/A -Cui Bono?-

From: The Extremist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Just a lifestyle, huh?
 
 What if it was your child?

Pedophilia has as much to do with homosexuality between consenting
adults as it does to heterosexuality between consenting adults.

No one points fingers at adult consenting heterosexuals when some
pervert molests a little girl...there is no reason to equate the
molestation of a minor boy to adult consenting homosexuality.


June

The story is about homosexual rape. I find it hard to hard to grasp
the concept of heterosexuals commiting homosexual rape. If they did
they wouldn't be heterosexual anymore, would they?

Scoreboard:
Defenders of minor children: 1
Defenders of Homos: 3

What ever happened to the For the Children crowd?
**
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Patriot Resource
Center:

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6627/
**Live Free or
Die!**



[CTRL] Wyoming Sheriff Hoax Revealed

2000-01-16 Thread True Patriot

-Caveat Lector-   A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"
/A -Cui Bono?-

Well I am shocked. For people who take pride in picking apart government
statements to find conspiracy theories all over, you take this story at face
value. So I've decided to do it for you, since clearly you cannot.

Let's go to the original post, in its entirety with point by point
refutations:

WYOMING SHERIFF PUTS FEDERAL OFFICERS ON CHOKE CHAINS

County sheriffs in Wyoming are insisting that all federal law
enforcement officers and personnel from federal regulatory agencies must
clear all their activities in a Wyoming county
with the Sheriff's Office.

(There is only one "sheriff" cited, and as we are about to see, that
"sheriff" is questionable.)

Speaking at a press conference following the recent US District  Court
decision (case No 2:96-cv-099-J), Bighorn County Sheriff Dave Mattis stated
that all federal officials are forbidden to enter his county without his
prior approval.

(Now, look at this. RECENT decsion, and yet the Case notes below say
"Closed: 29th April 1997". April 1997 is RFECENT in relation to January
2000? Next, let's look at "Sheriff" Dave Mattis. Again, let's see the case
notes say the party is "Case: Castaneda v. USA" not "Mattis v. USA" or even
"Castaneda et. al. v. USA".  Now, the case number. Here the case number is
"No 2:96-cv-099-J" below in the case notes it is "Case No: 2:1996cv00099" no
J in sight and "96" becomes "1996". I'll forgo the hyphen problems, that'd
just be petty.)

"If a sheriff doesn't want the Feds in his county, he has the Constitutional
power and Right to keep them out -or- ask them to leave -or- retain them in
custody."

(Ok, nice quote from this "phantom" Sheriff Castaneda...er...Mattis I mean.
This ability to quote will become important later.)

The court decision came about after Mattis  other members of   the Wyoming
Sheriffs' Association brought a suit against both the BATF and the IRS in
the Wyoming federal court district seeking restoration of the protections
enshrined in the United States Constitution and the Wyoming Constitution.

(Now, court decision. BUT as has been shown before in other posts, it was
NOT a court decision but a "settlement". Here's a quote from one post: "His
case was settled with a settlement, he says, not a court decision." Now, I
know this is double hearsay, but then again all YOU havei is double hearsay,
so if yours is acceptable, so is mine. AND let's also note that any
Lexis-Nexis or Westlaw search will show NO such suit filed in ANY Wyoming
case. In fact the ONLY case with the Wyoming Sheriff's Association involved
retirement benefits, and was to mention that the petitioner was a member of
the group.)

The District Court ruled in favor of the sheriffs,

("Castaneda v. USA" not "Castandea et. al. v. USA. Can't keep the story
straight, can they?)

stating that, "Wyoming is a sovereign state and the duly elected sheriff of
a county is the highest law enforcement official within a county and has law
enforcement powers exceeding that of any other state or federal official."

(WHERE IS THIS DOCUMENT? They can quote the document, but NO ONE seems to be
able to provide it. Now, wether it is a settlement, a court order, or some
scribble on a napkin, they seem to be able to quote it. And yet when asked
to provide it, they suddenly say "Well, it is under gag" or "The "Sheriff"
doesn't have it." IF it was a judiciaul determination, a settlement,
WHATEVER, then the parties to the case WOULD have a CERTIFIED copy of the
final order or determination. And CLEARLY they do, since they QUOTED it. But
suddenly when pressed, they cannot produce it? Sounds like something out of
the Clinton playbook: "I don't know where those billing records are,
Senator, but I can assure you as to what they say and can quote them to
you.")

The Wyoming sheriffs are demanding access to all BATF files to   verify that
the agency is not violating provisions of Wyoming law that prohibit the
registration of firearms or the keeping of a registry of firearm owners.

(Yep, and those files are the same place as this fictious court
order/settlement. Namely: never never land.)

The sheriffs are also demanding that federal agencies immediately cease the
seizure of private property and the impoundment of private bank accounts - -
- without regard to due process in state courts.

(I have a friend who is a tax attorney. He's going to pull up a few cases
from Wyoming since 1997 for failure to pay income tax liens and seizures by
the Federal Government. When he gives them to me, I'll post here. Suffice to
say this is all but certainly crap.)

Sheriff Mattis stated,

(Shouldn't that be Castaneda?)

"I am reacting to the actions of federal employees who have   attempted to
deprive citizens of my county of their privacy, their liberty, and their
property without regard to constitutional safeguards.

(By completely ignoring the supremecy clause of the Constitution)

I hope that more sheriffs all across America will 

Re: [CTRL] Fwd: WYOMING SHERIFFS PUT FEDERAL OFFICERS ON CHOKE CHAINS

2000-01-14 Thread True Patriot

-Caveat Lector-   A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"
/A -Cui Bono?-

Case: Castaneda v. USA
Filed: 10th May 1996
Closed: 29th April 1997
Case No: 2:1996cv00099 Wyoming District Court, Casper
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights

 WYOMING SHERIFFS PUT FEDERAL OFFICERS ON CHOKE CHAINS

I just ran a Lexis search using the case name, party names, case number
and a full search of every district court ruling for the month.
THERE IS NO SUCH CASE.
You have been had.
Don't believe me? Hit a library and run a Lexis or Westlaw search
yourself.
And note: these guys cannot seem to say WHICH judge issued this ficticious
order?

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] [ChristianPatriot] Re: [CTRL] Where's The Outrage?? Religious Freedom DENIED!

2000-01-13 Thread True Patriot

Yep, the Founders were Christian.
And they were also quite clear.
For get the 1st Amendment.
Read what they said in the Original:

Article 6, Clause 3

"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the
several State Legislatures, and all executive and
judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States,
shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this
Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a
Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."

Now, I want to repeat this, because the Founders seem to be very clear.

"BUT NO RELIGIOUS TEST SHALL EVER BE REQUIRED AS A QUALIFICATION TO ANY
OFFICE OR PUBLIC TRUST UNDER THE UNITED STATES."

I believe in original intent (or as Jack Rakove has proven so well original
intents, as every had their own indidivudlal minds). I believe that a
religious test for a teacher, a politician or whatever is DEAD BANG WRONG.
And I think the Founders would agree with me. Had they known the level to
which religious tests would have been used to gun after teachers, etc. I
have no doubt they'd have expanded the defintion.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

From: 
The Extremist [EMAIL PROTECTED]


At 01:26 AM 1/14/00 , you wrote:
It matters not a whit what our CURRENCY (which
really has no more value than
the paper it's printed on) says...our CONSTITUTION and BILL OF RIGHTS
states
that the government shall make no laws establishing a religion, NOR
PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF...

Therefore, these PUBLIC officials representing the public school system
have
absolutely no right to dismiss this teacher because she is a
Wiccan...

And what justification do YOU offer for her being fired? Do you
also feel
that teachers who are Buddhists, Taoists, Hindus, should be fired
too,
because
they worship a different diety (or set of dieties) than you do?

Your cavalier attitude toward the Constitution of the United States and
the
Bill of Rights is frightening, not to mention sickening...


June
Our country was founded on Christianity not Wiccan, Hinduism, etc.
The founders were the sons and grandsons of over a hundred years of
colonial Christian tradition. From the Charter to Sir Walter
Raleigh circa. 1584, through The First Virginia Charter (1606), The
Second Virginia Charter (1609), The Third Virginia Charter (1612), The
Mayflower Compact (1620), The Charter Of Massachusetts Bay (1629),
to the Declaration of Independence (1776), it is plain that the American
People were Christians and our forms of government were founded in the
bedrock of Christian Principles. It is because of the liberty that
Christian principles secure that people of other faiths have been able to
freely worship in a manner they choose.
No one who reads the founding documents of this country can honestly say
that this nation was founded on any religion other than
Christianity. Go read them for yourselves before you flame me out
of ignorance:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6627/xushistdoc.html

While the bubblegum Wiccans consider themselves a legitimate
religion and the Constitution affords them protection, in the matters
concerning the teaching of our children, the parents have a right to
demand a more traditional standard for teachers. The Wiccan
religion is foreign to traditional American standards and many of their
beliefs undermine the moral and societal bonds that keep a free nation
free. It is a slave religion based in ignorance, fear, and wishful
thinking.

On a personal note, I live 15 miles from Scotland High School, the school
that canned the witch, and I can tell you the people of this area do not
want witches teaching their kids.

Were we founded on Christian Principles?
What did the signers of our most important Document, the Declaration of
Independence say?

We have this day restored the Sovereign to Whom all men ought to
be
obedient. He reigns in heaven, and from the rising to the setting of
the
sun, let His Kingdom come.
First of all, I . . . rely upon the merits of Jesus Christ for
a
pardon of all my sins.
-Samuel Adams(Father of the American Revolution), at the signing of
the
Declaration of Independence.

I am constrained to express my adoration of . . . the Author of my
existence . . . [for] His forgiving mercy revealed to the world
through Jesus Christ, through whom I hope for never ending
happiness
in a future state.
-Robert Treat Paine, Signer of the Declaration

I think it proper here not only to subscribe to . . . doctrines of
the
Christian religion . . . but also, in the bowels of a father's
affection, to exhort and charge them [my children] that the fear of
God is the beginning of wisdom, that the way of life held up in the
Christian system is calculated for the most complete happiness.
-Richard Stockton, Signer of the Declaration

On the mercy of my Redeemer I rely for salvation and on His merits;

Re: [CTRL] The Real Titles of Nobility Amendment FAQ

2000-01-11 Thread True Patriot

-Caveat Lector-   A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"
/A -Cui Bono?-

It is important to note too that Alabama has had since 1901 Constitution the
following:

SECTION 29

Titles of nobility, hereditary distinction, etc.; restriction on
appointments to office.

That no title of nobility or hereditary distinction, privilege, honor, or
emolument shall ever be granted or conferred in this state; and that no
office shall be created, the appointment to which shall be for a longer time
than during good behavior.

And I'd like to point out that lawyers use Esquire in Alabama since 1901.
Squire and Esquire were NEVER a title of NOBILITY. Hell, they were below
KNIGHTS.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] SNET: The Occult nature of UN part 2

2000-01-07 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

How to make your own UN conspiracy theory.

1) Take some well established facts.
A. The UN Charter was signed in San Francisco.
B. San Francisco has a lot of homosexuals.
C. The UN General ASSembly (Note: ASS) first met in Queens, NY.
D. Queen is slang for "homosexual"
E. New York City has a lot of homosexuals.

2) Take the aforementioned facts, and come to a bizzare conclusion.
A. The UN Charter is a homosexual plot.

3) Scatter to all your paranoid buddies who will agree since it fits nicely
into their preconceived conspiracy notions.

Now, try this one on for size. And remember, use the method!

1) Take some well established facts.
A. San Francisco where the UN Charter was signed: "The City by the Bay".
B. The UN Headquarters in New York City is in an area called "Turle Bay".
C. Pat Buchanan's sister is named "Bay"

2) Take the aformentioned facts, and come to a bizzare conclusion.
A. The UN is slowly trying to infiltrate every bay on earth.
B. Bay Buchanan is a UN operative. Her name is code for this "UN-Bay"
conspiracy.

3) Scatter to all your paranoid buddies who will agree since it fits nicely
into their preconceived conspiracy notions.

Fun for the whole "patriot" cell!
Loads of fun at "common law courts"!
It's the game EVERYONE can play!

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Noah's Ark - Revisited

2000-01-05 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

NOAH VS. "PATRIOTS"
And the Lord spoke to Noah and said, "In one year, I am going to make it
rain and cover the whole earth with water until all flesh is destroyed. But
I want you to save the righteous people and two of
every kind of living thing on the earth. Therefore, I am commanding you to
build an Ark." In a flash of lightening, God delivered the specifications
for an Ark. In fear and trembling, Noah took the plans
and agreed to build the Ark. "Now, remember," said the Lord, "You must
complete the Ark and bring everything aboard in one year." Exactly one year
later, fierce storm clouds covered the earth and
all the seas of the earth went into a tumult. The Lord looked down and saw
Noah lying in his front yard, bleeding. "Noah," God shouted down, "where is
the Ark?" "Oh, Lord, please forgive me!" cried
Noah. "I did my best, but there were big problems. First, I was attacked by
some Aryan Nationers, since I am from the Middle East and now of pure Aryan
blood. Then I got into a fight with some
skin heads and “Christian Identity” people who attacked me for not believing
in Jesus (who is that guy anyway?) and for being a member of the ZOG. Then
my neighbor objected, claiming I was
building a landing pad for the UN black helicopters he saw buzzing around
violating his “sovereign air space”; so I had to convince him I was not an
NWO operative. I had problems getting enough
wood or anything for the Ark, after I was indicted by a “common law court”
and the local stores were told “don’t sell to the indicted Jew”. When I told
them I wanted to build the ark, and that God
had told me to save all the righteous people. They didn't take very kindly
to the idea that they had no jurisdiction over the conduct of the Creator of
the universe since they assume their version of God
is the valid one and that their “sovereign citizen” jurisdiction was the
valid one. They assumed ARK was some government plant to ship them off to
concentration camps and that I was suggesting some
sort of One World Religion as part of a One World Government as part of a
New World Order. That got a lien put on the ark by the “common law court”
and they ran in here and grabbed all by tools
to “remittance of the lien”. Finally the local “militia” drove a Ryder truck
full of explosives up to the ark and detonated it, killing a lot of my
neighbors and leaving me this bleeding mess.
"I really don't think I can finish the Ark for another 5 or 6 years, at
least!" wailed Noah. The sky began to clear, the sun began to shine, and the
seas began to calm. A rainbow arched across the sky.
Noah looked up hopefully. "You mean you are not going to destroy the earth,
Lord?" "No," said the Lord sadly. "It's too late. The “patriots” already
have."

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Drudge/Excite: Tripp Hung Out to Dry (fwd)

2000-01-05 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

 Secondly, Tripp's recording always (as far as I know) crossed
 State lines and would therefore seem to be a Federal issue, over
 which Starr's office's immunity grant would seem to be
 unequivocal.

 Could somebody please explain why this isn't a slam-dunk for
 Tripp?

Simply because something crosses a state line does NOT make it only Federal,
or only the issue of a given state. Let me explain.

A stands 100 yards inside the State of New York. B stands 100 yards inside
the state of New Jersey (200 yards total distance between the two). A fires
a rifle, bullet goes directly into B's heart. B's dead before he hits the
ground. Who has jurisdiction?

Answer is: Everyone.

The criminal act was in New Jersey. The firing of the bullet with intent to
kill. The bullet then actually killed SOMEONE (Note: as a matter of law,
intent follows the bullet. IF A's bullet had nicked B and then tore half of
C's head open, that is still murder.)

The result of the criminal activity was in New York. A bullet fired by
someone with intent to kill killed someone in the confines of the State of
New York. That makes it a matter for the State of New York, as the death
occured in the state.

Now why did I say 100 yards? Because MANY states (I'd say all) state that if
the action occurs within X yards of the border, the state can take it. This
is to avoid the infamous "Well I'll make a run for the border" stuff. I
think NY is 100 yards from its border, I don't think NJ is much different.

And let's not forget the potential Federal aspect. Since this was a crime
involving the crossing of a state line, the Feds could argue jurisdiction.
Doubtful, but possible.

Now, what does this have to do with Tripp?

Maryland law applies since the (alledged) criminal action occured in
Maryland. The resulting injury was in DC, but since DC is a federal
district, a grant of immunity by Starr covers. A Federal prosecutor's grant
of immunity does NOT however utterly totally preclude a state prosecution. A
Federal JUDGE orderiing such a immunity does "Full faith and credit". That's
why Maryland is scrambling to prove its case without using anything gotten
from Starr's work to avoid this issue altogether.

But this raising a whole nother issue: if a prosecutor grant immunity, does
it need to be signed by a judge before it is offical? Well, that depends on
the kind of immunity (limited, full, "transactional", etc.), the state, and
so on.

So, what do we have with Tripp:

State-to-District jurisditional problem
Time when an immunity agreement is deemed "in place"
State's authority to ignore a Federal immunity deal if/when

One more point Tripp was suppose to argue: Federal law says that the
collection of information of a felony is valid (kinda like "citizens
arrest". If you see a Federal crime (or any crime for that matter)in front
of you, you are SUPPOSE to observe it if you can. Now Tripp was going to
argue that since Federal law made such a collection of information ok, and
since Federal law trumps state law (supremecy clause) that her collection
was proper. The counter arguement: the collection of information means if
you see a murder taking place, you are SUPPOSE to watch. NOT then sit there
and go run and grab a video recorder, come back and ask the murderer "Can
you please get into frame? Thanks."

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Don't Talk To Cops

2000-01-04 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

YES you have the right to assure that the person you are talking to is a
public servant/law enforcement officer.
NO that does not give you permission to ask a thousand different questions.
scofflaw stopped by traffic cop in uniform refused to produce his
(non-existent) license or proof of insurance and instead tried
to insist that cop first fill out his "Public Servant's Questionnaire"
(PSQ), convicted of obstructing a police officer. City of
Billings v. Skurdal (1986) 224 Mont 84, 730 P2d 371 cert.den 481 US 1020;
the same sort of PSQ was held an improper
attempt at discovery, and could not be used during litigation under the Fed
Rules of Civil Procedure ( the PSQ included
questions about govt employee's Social Security Numbers,  home phone numbers
and addresses, and details about spouses -
all explicitly beyond the scope of the Freedom of Information Act, even
though two versions of the PSQ on the internet refer to
the FOIA as their source of authority).  US v.  Scott (ND Ind unpub 2/4/98)
81 AFTR2d 1076 judgmt entered (ND Ind unpub
10/8/98) and his subsequent attempt to appeal on the grounds that the court
should have compelled the govt employees to
answer his PSQs was fined heavily as "frivolous squared". US v. Scott (7th
Cir unpub 6/23/99); not an acceptable alternative to
a Freedom of Information or Privacy Act request, and could not sue fed govt
employees for not filling out his PSQ. Murdock
v.  Kay (ED Mich unpub 7/23/96) 96 USTC para 50517, 78 AFTR2d 6117 aff'd 124
F3d 198(t), 97 USTC para 50776, 80
AFTR2d 6485; ditto ("Plaintiff cited no authority supporting his right to
have these questionnaires completed, and we are aware
of none.") Allen v.  Cantrell (D Kan unpub 12/27/78) 79 USTC para 9171, 43
AFTR2d 710; similarly (presented traffic cop
with a "Notice to arresting officer with Miranda warning") State v.  Booher
(Tenn.Crim.App 1997) 978 SW2d 953.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Got this in my email

2000-01-03 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-



Can you imagine working at the following Company? It has a little over
500 employees with the following statistics:

snip

This is an urban legend sheet. It's made its way around numerous times. if
you go to deja.com or some other news group search engine and you type in
"Congress 500 and employees" or so and read up on it, this has been shut
down. The most glaring one that 117 or so Congress members have bankrupted 2
or more businesses.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] It's January 3rd. Where's the martial law I was told to expect?

2000-01-03 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

Well I gave it a few days.
I even thought I saw a UN blue helmet. Turned out my neighbor got a new
hat.
But there was no NWO takeover.
No FEMA command.
No Executive Order declaring martial law.
No foreign troops marching in the streets.
Nothing.
Nada.
So you paranoid wack jobs, where are you apologizes for crying wolf?

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] [SonsofLiberty] ALERT : It's January 3rd. Where's the Martial Law.

2000-01-03 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

--Original Message--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patriots)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 3, 2000 8:37:07 PM GMT
Subject: [SonsofLiberty] ALERT : It's January 3rd. Where's the Martial
Law.


Anyone know the identity and location of a one : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(True Patriot) ?

What, you and your little "militia" going to drive a Ryder truck up to
my house and blow it up? ROFL. You don't scare me. I pity you.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] [SonsofLiberty] ALERT : It's January 3rd. Where's theM

2000-01-03 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

Ease up dude. These clowns are in a state of " Post Millennial Bonkers."
Their world has moved underneath their feet, and they are shaky as a
cornered rat. They are not worth hassling over unless someone threatens
you.

How about you  I go into business buying back 4 million tons of dried
food at 1/4 price these morons ( over-)paid for it and distribute it to
the SANE poor who could really use it for survival.

Just a thought.

And a smart one.
I think EBAY is going to have a run on all sorts of "survivalist" crud. What
a joke these guys are. Their paranoid delusions are crashing down now that
y2k didn't equal NWO/UN/martial law.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] [2ndAmendment] It's January 3rd. Where's the martial law I was told to ex

2000-01-03 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

--Original Message--
From: "J. Hurd" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: True Patriot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 3, 2000 7:17:37 PM GMT
Subject: Re: [2ndAmendment] It's January 3rd. Where's the martial law I was
told
to ex


 I am very sorry for preparing for the  unknownNOT.

But that is NOT what you paranoid wackos were preparing for.
You and your ilk were babbling about NWO, Martial (or Marshall) Law, the UN
troops in the forest or somewhere taking over, the Executive Order that
would mea FEMA suspends the Constitution, etc.
It was NOT the unknown you were preparing against, it was against your
paranoid delusions. Stop parsing words and have the COURAGE to say those
simple words:

"I am sorry I cried wolf".

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] J.J. Johnson Surrenders? Or just starts to MAKE SENSE.

2000-01-03 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

Wow. Finally one of you "patriot" and "militia" wackos starts to make sense:
bomb throwing and playing solider is NOT THE ANSWER. Note the part about
self-appointed officers and read Art. 1 Section 8 about who is allowed ot
appoint officers of the militia (the state, not self-appointment).

http://www.jj-johnson.com/r2k1.htm

RESOLUTION 2000 Part 1 of 3

This three-part essay will explain in detail my opinions in restoring
liberty to this nation based on my experience. I will give opinions that
will be controversial. I will give ideas on what can be done effectively.
But before any new structure can be built, we must remove the wreckage
before laying a new foundation. This essay has been written to help, not
hurt Second Amendment associates across the country. We have all seen what
works, and what doesn’t. It’s a New Year.

…Let’s make some New Resolutions.

The most devastating weapons today being used against militia groups are
the “groups” themselves, their adversaries’ ability to gather information,
and the ability of their adversaries to act outside public view. This has
been
proven in case after case. When I mean “militia group”, I am NOT including
those who’s members are immediate family. In making this New Resolution to
secure our nation’s freedom and our personal freedom, we will address these
three issues (In three separate parts). This should clearly explain to
everyone why I am advocating a complete dismantling of the "militia
movement". Before you jump to any conclusions, read this entire essay, and
then make
your decision.


PART 1 - The Militia Group Itself.

What these groups have advocated people to do for preparation has been done
by millions
of Americans (this is why the militia is deemed a threat to the powers that
be). The "militia
movement" however, will probably never get credit. The units that were
created, both public
and private, were created with the best intentions. Most Americans, whether
they like it or
not, are part of the U.S. un-organized militia. And the legal justification
is clearly outlined
in Title 10, U.S.C. 311 of the U.S. Code, as well as the Second Amendment of
the U.S.
Constitution.

Reality: That and $.25 won’t buy you a round of ammo in the Year 2000.

If you are in a militia group, you are deemed by your adversaries as a
“domestic terrorist”,
a “co-conspirator” and a “menace to society.” Good luck trying to convince a
jury
otherwise. If or when you are forced to walk into a federal court, you have
already been
determined to be a "threat" to everyone in the building just by your
presence. The legal
documentation you carry in with you is irrelevant. But here’s what’s worse:
Before your
arrest, if you are in a militia “group”, you are a target for a charge of
conspiracy, even if
you committed no crime. I didn’t make up these rules, nor do I agree with
them. But if you
are in one of these groups or organizations, that’s the game you’re in.

This is the mandate given to the Joint Terrorism Task Force.

We’ve already gone over what it takes to be charged with a conspiracy. But
we’ll go over it again. Doing exactly what the militia was intended for is
a "federal crime" in 21st century America. They don't have to target you,
just
others members of your group or organization while you're in audio range.
But in order to have a conspiracy, they must have at least two people. The
snitch doesn’t count. By dismantling your “group”, you take way one of the
most effective weapons they have (and have used) against you.

[I wish I could scream that last sentence to everyone. Just read it again.]

Public statement sayings “we quit” is not enough and not necessary. The
“informant” will still be there, even if you and your eight friends just
decide to be quiet about. If you have signed a document saying that you are
a member of a certain militia, rescind it, now (unless you have written
approval from your Governor or local Sheriff). That means write up another
document, sign it, and make sure a copy gets to all the other members. If
your group has been public, make it public. This is proof that you
“withdrew” from any conspiracy. The Libertarian pledge works pretty well
as a starter or boilerplate:

“I hereby pledge and do not advocate the use of force to achieve political
of social goals...”

If you are part of a "pro-Constitutional" group, this pledge should be
adopted as part of your charter anyway, if you have one. Every officer of
that group should sign it, and file it into the public record. Sounds like
you’re giving in? You’re not. This will just thwart the investigation on
you that is probably already ongoing , put the "informant" out of business,
and put you on a better foundation. I am only telling you this for your own
good.

Let’s go over this: You are not a member of any militia group, regiment,
company, cell, battalion, division, command staff, special operations
group, alpha, bravo or Zulu team, strike force, alliance, advisory
committee, or
unit. 

Re: [CTRL] To all you chicken littles and wolf criers (RE: By the

1999-12-31 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

--Original Message--
From: Kris Millegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 31, 1999 4:52:19 PM GMT
Subject: Re: [CTRL] To all you chicken littles and wolf criers (RE: By the



-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 12/31/99 2:15:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Ah, the NWO/UN/Y2K conspiracy crud continues.
When you guys going to learn? Your paranoid rants are being proven wrong
all
over.
And this Y2K is the greatest example.


Ever hear of a strawman?

Yeah, isn't that the guy who has my name, only it is in ALL CAPS because my
birth certificate is somehow a contract to the Federal Reserve which since
it is bankrupt has auctioned off my strawman to bankers to bail out the US
Government?

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] To all you chicken littles and wolf criers (RE: By the time that you read this)

1999-12-31 Thread True Patriot

Ah, the NWO/UN/Y2K conspiracy crud continues.
When you guys going to learn? Your paranoid rants are being proven wrong all
over.
And this Y2K is the greatest example.

There will be no martial law.
There will be no mass railcar transports.
There will be no concentration camp detentions.
There will be no UN troops in the streets.
There will be no FEMA suspending the Constitution.
There will be no Clinton suspending the Constitution.
There will be no NWO One World Government formed.
There will be none of this crap you paranoids came up with.

All these wonderful predictions have been made as to y2k. They are all
failing to materialize. Miserably.

When January 2, 2000 comes and NONE of the paranoid rants you guy though of
have come to fruition, let me suggest you try to come up with good excuses.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001




Assuming you receive this after 3AM EST, it is 
already Y2K somewhere out in the Pacific. Judging by the absence of Top 
Ramen on the supermarket shelves, I would guess that a number of people have 
bought themselves a slice oflast-minute hysteria. 

At least I know of no New Year's recipes that 
require large quantities of tasteless squiggly noodles. Indeed, the only 
traditional New Year's Dayfare I know of is the mandatory dish of 
Black-eyed Peas and Ham (for prosperity in the coming year).

So why in the hell would anyone want a bunch of Top 
Ramen for survival rations? These things are being put in the pantry 
because the weak-willed are scared that they are going to wake up with no 
electricity. Well, ever tried making Top Ramen with cold water? For 
that matter, if the power is off, there isn't going to be any water pressure 
either-- is there? Ever tried Top Ramen dry right out of the bag? 
Even if you have electricity and water, ever tried living on a straight diet of 
Top Ramen for weeks on end?

You might find yourself looking forward tothe 
food served on those railroad Prison Cars-- known to us non-scarecrows ("Gee, if 
I only had a brain") as automobile transports. It fills me with the 
greatest anger to see bullshit like this coming over the airwaves. Not 
three months ago, I sat in a room with patriot leaders from all across America 
and their opinion was unanimous: "There are no prison camps. 
Period."Not "no prison camps that we know of" but "no prison camps, 
period". We all had a good laugh at those benighted morons who dream this 
stuff up and then got down to some real business.So why would they 
give even one micoscopic iota of creedence to a report that special railroad 
cars have been fitted out to transport dissidents to the camps that everybody 
agrees are non-existent?

Why do these same patriot leaders continue to 
forwardimbecilic drivel that they KNOW to be untrue? Or allow it to 
pass on through without comment?With strategy like this, is it any 
wonder that nothing has been accomplished in the last five years?That so 
many decent citizens who agree with us in principlerefuse to let us darken 
their doors in public tells all that needs to be said about such tactics. 
Our only answer to any problem seems to be: "If someone knocks on my door, 
I'm going to give them a faceful of bullets". It didn't work for 
Custer. 


If ever there was a time for New Year's Day 
Resolutions, this is it. I personally resolve to do the 
following:

1) Because I deeply resent being lied to by 
the Dan Rat-herds and Bill Clintons of the world, I solemnly promise not to 
EVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES , emulate their example. I would rather fix 
myself a Drano milkshake than be put in the same category as these 
olympic-caliber Orwellians. I will tell the truth to the best of my 
understanding at the time-- certainly to those I regard as friendsas well 
as to those who disagree with me. If I find out that I have not told the 
truth, I will immediately retract my previous statement with the same vigor as 
Ipublished the original misstatement of fact.
2) What the hell, that's enough for one 
year. One disaster at a time.


The Union forever




Re: [CTRL] When there *IS* no martial law/NWO/UN Y2K take over, will

1999-12-30 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

--Original Message--
From: John Hurd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: True Patriot [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 But what if they are right

A completely valid question. Turnabout is fair play.
If they are right, then you'll never hear an apology from me. Why? Because
if these wack jobs *ARE* right, the NWO/UN/ZOG/FEMA whatever will 1) shut
down e-mail 2) throw me into a "UN concentration camp" 3) kill me or 4) a
combination of 1-3. In any event, apologies will be out of the question.
HOWEVER, when it does NOT happen, the e-mails will be up, no one will be in
"UN concentration camps" and no one will be killed by the NWO or whatever.
So, THEY have no excuse to not admit they were WRONG.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] When there *IS* no martial law/NWO/UN Y2K take over, will you admit you were WRONG?

1999-12-29 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

Come January 2, when the US is not put under NWO/FEMA/UN/Executive
Order/etc. Martial (or Marshall to some of you morons) law, you paranoid
wack jobs will of course have to apologize for crying wolf and trying to
panic people. Most of you are just sick, but there are others doing this to
sell their "survival" crud or convince people to pull a McVeigh and blow
stuff up.

The question is: will you have the decency to admit you were WRONG, or try
to invent an excuse?

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL]

1999-12-26 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

Take heed everyone.
I told you a few weeks ago to put a down payment on excuses for when y2k
does NOT mean (insert paranoid conspiracy theory) here. Below see some of my
satisfied customers who have found all sorts of rationales for why their own
conspiracy theories are NOT coming true! (Pushing the date back is a best
seller.)

As Jan. 1 Draws Near, Doomsayers Reconsider
The Apocalypse Is Still Coming--Later
By Hanna Rosin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, December 27, 1999; Page A01

A year ago, Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins, who have sold more than 10 million
copies of their "Left Behind" thrillers about the Apocalypse, prophesied
global upheaval on Jan. 1, 2000.

The Y2K bug could trigger "financial meltdown," they warned readers on their
Web site, "making it possible for the Antichrist or his emissaries . . . to
dominate the world commercially until it is destroyed."

But now that the hour is upon us, the prophets of doom are retreating.

"We don't think it relates to Y2K at all," Jenkins said. "And we're bemused
by people who do."

Reminded of the Web site prediction, he said, "We regret having talked about
it." Over the last year, Jenkins said, he has been reassuring nervous fans
they have nothing to fear.

Even those who fully embraced the date as late as last month are now backing
down. Some prophets are hedging their bets, reminding everyone they only
said "maybe," or they never specified the Western world, or Jan. 1 exactly.
Others such as the Rev. Jerry Falwell say they have read the Y2K compliance
reports and found them soothing. All are expecting a humdrum New Year's Eve.

Grant R. Jeffrey, author of titles such as "The Millennium Meltdown" and
"Armageddon: Earth's Last Days," is also blase. Earlier this year, the
Toronto-based minister wrote that the Y2K bug "may set the stage for the
creation of the coming world government that was prophesied to arise in the
last days."

Now he's downsizing his expectations. "It will be frustrating, like computer
errors, delays in waiting for planes, that kind of thing," he said.

Jeffrey does not disavow his disaster predictions, but expects them to
unfold only distantly, "in the Third World" and not quite so suddenly.

"It's not a January problem," Jeffrey added. "It will manifest itself
gradually throughout the year, like maybe in March or April or May, or even
later."

It seems that the Apocalypse has been postponed. Now that the date is
tangible, signs of the second coming of Christ are becoming hazy. The
millions of fundamentalist Christians who seized on the Y2K bug as proof
that a techno-idolatrous world was doomed now see it as more of a nuisance.

"The end times people are backing down," said Damian Thompson, author of
"The End of Time: Faith and Fear in the Shadow of the Millennium," a study
of modern doomsday cults. "People who last year became excited about the
millennium bug are suddenly saying, 'I never said that. It was him, not me.'
They're extremely nervous of having December 31st, 1999, pinned on them
forever."

Earlier this year, Falwell distributed a packet on "The Y2K Time Bomb,"
including a video, "A Christian's Guide to the Millennium Bug," and a Family
Readiness Checklist, telling people to stock up on such items as gardening
utensils, Q-tips and peanut butter and jelly.

"Y2K is God's instrument to shake this nation, to humble this nation,"
Falwell said in a television broadcast last year. "He may be preparing to
confound our language, to jam our communications, scatter our efforts, and
judge us for our sin and rebellion for going against his lordship."

But Falwell says he has read the government and banking reports and he is no
longer a "fatalist"; in fact, he's "encouraged." A few weeks ago, Falwell
withdrew the video and has been toning down the visions. "I don't anticipate
any major problems," he said last week. "I would fly in an airplane that
day."

When it was first revealed, the Y2K bug suited the apocalyptic temperament.
It's timing even validated fundamentalist numerology. In 1654, Archbishop
James Ussher of Armagh dated creation to 4004 B.C., and counting forward
using numerical clues, predicted Christ's reign on Earth would begin about
6,000 years later, during what became known in evangelical circles as the
Great Week.

From the mainstream to the fringes, evangelical Christians adopted the Y2K
bug as their own. For the last two years, they have held conferences
teaching the flock how to filter water, bag sand, dry peas. Popular
Christian magazines advertised gold bullion and Rapture insurance policies
(in case you were snatched up to Heaven but your loved ones were left
behind).

But as the day approaches, even some of the fringe groups are mellowing.

"I'm aware of hardly anyone who's still saying 1/1/2000 is the big day,"
said Ted Daniel, who runs the Millennial Center in Pennsylvania and keeps a
close eye on doomsday cults. "It's the usual pattern: If you're a
millenarian prophet, you have to 

Re: [CTRL] The Beating of Citizen joe 6pk by the Gestapo

1999-12-24 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

Jon Roland wrote:

The Beating of "Citizen joe 6pk" by the Gestapo

12/23/99
 He repeated his question and as I began repeating my answer, I reached to
pull out my copy of the Constitution. The booklet went flying from my hand
as he drove my head into the corner of the post, followed quickly by a chop
to my windpipe.

Nothing says "moron" like reaching in your pocket when there is a cop there.
For all the cop knows you are going for a gun,
especially since you refuse to answer if you have one.


 My female captor asked me for a nickname or alias. I have a Christian name
I responded and started telling her the Capital and small letter spelling.
She said I'm not listening to this crap and I am not going to release you
w/o one she demanded. So after reviewing my lack of option, I stated my
sister calls me "Bubby". 

She got the crap part right. Thanks again to Becraft on this one.

"According to a book written by Berkheimer, a "nom de guerre" is a war name
symbolized by a given
name being written in capital letters. The argument contends that because of
events in 1933, we have been
made "enemies" and government indicates our status as enemies by the nom de
guerre. If this is true, then
why have the styles of the decisions of the United States Supreme Court
since its establishment been in
caps? This argument has gotten lots of people in trouble. For example, Mike
Kemp of the Gadsden Militia
defended himself on state criminal charges with this argument and he was
thrown into jail. I have not even
seen a decent brief on this issue which was predicated upon cases you can
find in an ordinary law library.

In any event, several courts have rejected this argument:

1. Jaeger v. Dubuque County, 880 F.Supp. 640 (N.D.Iowa 1995)
2. United States v. Heard, 952 F.Supp. 329 (N.D.W.Va. 1996)
3. Boyce v. C.I.R., 72 T.C.M. ¶ 1996-439 ("an objection to the spelling of
petitioners' names in capital
letters because they are not 'fictitious entities'" was rejected)
4. United States v. Washington, 947 F.Supp. 87, 92 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)("Finally,
the defendant contends
that the Indictment must be dismissed because 'Kurt Washington,' spelled out
in capital letters, is a
fictitious name used by the Government to tax him improperly as a business,
and that the correct spelling
and presentation of his name is 'Kurt Washington.' This contention is
baseless")
5. United States v. Klimek, 952 F.Supp. 1100 (E.D.Pa. 1997)
6. In re Gdowik, 228 B.R. 481, 482 (S.D.Fla. 1997)(claim that "the use of
his name JOHN E GDOWIK
is an 'illegal misnomer' and use of said name violates the right to his
lawful status" was rejected)
7. Russell v. United States, 969 F.Supp. 24, 25 (W.D. Mich.
1997)("Petitioner ... claims because his
name is in all capital letters on the summons, he is not subject to the
summons"; this argument held
frivolous)
8. United States v. Lindbloom, 97-2 U.S.T.C.  ¶ 50650 (W.D. Wash. 1997)("In
this submission, Mr.
Lindbloom states that he and his wife are not proper defendants to this
action because their names are not
spelled with all capital letters as indicated in the civil caption." The
CAPS argument and the "refused for
fraud" contention were rejected)
9. Rosenheck  Co., Inc. v. United States, 79 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2715 (N.D.
Ok. 1997)("Kostich has
made the disingenuous argument the IRS documents at issue here fail to
properly identify him as the
taxpayer. Defendant Kostich contends his ‘Christian name' is Walter Edward,
Kostich, Junior and since
the IRS documents do not contain his ‘Christian name,' he is not the person
named in the Notice of Levy.
The Court expressly finds Defendant WALTER EDWARD KOSTICH JR. is the person
identified in the
Notice of Levy, irrespective of the commas, capitalization of letters, or
other alleged irregularities Kostich
identifies as improper. Similarly, the Court's finding applies to the filed
pleadings in this matter")
10. United States v. Weatherley, 12 F.Supp.2d 469 (E.D.Pa. 1998)
11. United States v. Frech, 149 F.3d 1192 (10th Cir. 1998)("Defendants'
assertion that the capitalization
of their names in court documents constitutes constructive fraud, thereby
depriving the district court of
jurisdiction and venue, is without any basis in law or fact").

The nom de guerre position is one rabidly advocated by Wrong Way Law. It is
all based upon hype and
emotions; the speakers who advocate this argument know how to push the
emotional "hot buttons" at
patriot pep rallies. I have reviewed the "best" briefs regarding this issue
and they are all trash. Yet I
continue to see people call themselves "John, of smith," etc., and I just
simply conclude that such parties
have attended a Wrong Way Law seminar and have accepted a pack of lies.
Further, it is remarkable that
all the people who believe this idea have never checked it out; they just
accept it because some patriot
guru claimed it was correct."

 You must sign them now or you will not be released he demanded. So I
wrote: under duress w/o 

[CTRL] S.A.L.U.T.E. report of enemy force! Not a drill! Warning! Sit rep to follow!

1999-12-24 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

I have recently witnessed the following. It is VERY important that we
"patriots" keep true to the SALUTE pattern and monitor this threat!

Size of Enemy Force: 1 unit consisting of a what appeared to be a male in
some sort of armored open top vehichle. 9 draft animals pulling the unit
across my soverign airspace.

Activities of Enemy = Landed on rooftop. Leapt from unit which on further
examination appeared to be a sleigh with what appeared to be deer (see Unit
I.D.) Entered using a no-knock warrant (no warrant for that matter). Repeled
or otherwise decended down chimey bearing a large bag, not doubt containing
UN commands and NWO material as part of the impending Y2K takeover. Suspect
this is a test for when UN troops enter my house to get my guns. Spoke some
language, Finnish or Dutch. Was able to make out "Kris Kringle" before I
unloaded a full clip (that'll stop the NWO bastard!) Before dying, his
stomach looked like a bowl full of jelly. Large black belt with buckle, long
white beard also seen.

Location = My bunker. Location not to be revealed in this manner, since
communications are being monitored by Echelon.

Unit I.D. of uniforms/vehicles = Paramilitiary, possibly communist (large
useage of the color red). Possibly satanic, trying to stop the impending
return of the Lord. Vehicle appeared to be an old fashioned "sleigh", no
doubt a cover for the the armor and arsenal hidden underneath. Vehicle was
pulled by what appeared to be deer of some type, not of the country (no
doubt imported and trained at the secret UN bases I keep hearing about).

Time and date = Approximately 2 AM, morning of 25 December 1999.

Equipment = Large bag, containing toys which were apparently to be used to
lull and bribe my kids into his One World Government plot. List of children
divided into "Good" and "Bad" found. GOOD apparently standing for "Governed
Over (by) One Dominion" a clear reference to the impending takeover. BAD
apparently standing for "Battling, Anti-NWO Destroyable". 8 previously
mentioned "deer of foreign origin" killed for meat. 9th had a glowing red
nose, no doubt a beckon to the other members of his invasion/occupation
force of ZOG. Terminated with extreme prejudice. Made tasty steak.

We MUST be on the look out, this may not be the only one using these
methods. We MUST be prepared! Shoot first, ask questions later!

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Defintion of militia

1999-12-23 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

Please examine for a moment the following on the issue of militia control.
And
please note, it does NOT include self-appointed (or self-annointed) paranoid
wack
jobs. Nor are the powers of Congress limited to times of invasion, etc. For
example, Congress sets the discipline of the militia and provides for the
orgaznizing, arming, and disciplining at all times. Moreover, the
"governing" means
just that: The states govern based on the methods laid down by Congress
until
Congress takes direct control or "governing".

U.S. Constitution Article 1 Section 8 Paragraph 16 "To provide for
organizing,
arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them
as may
be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States
respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training
the
Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"

10 USC 311 Militia: composition and classes (a) The militia of the United
States
consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as
provided
in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made
a
declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of
female
citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. (b) The
classes of the militia are - (1) the organized militia, which consists of
the
National Guard and the Naval Militia; and (2) the unorganized militia, which
consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National
Guard or
the Naval Militia.

18 USC 2389 Recruiting for service against United States Whoever recruits
soldiers
or sailors within the United States, or in any place subject to the
jurisdiction
thereof, to engage in armed hostility against the same; or Whoever opens
within the
United States, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, a
recruiting
station for the enlistment of such soldiers or sailors to serve in any
manner in
armed hostility against the United States - Shall be fined under this title
or
imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

18 USC 2390 Enlistment to serve against United States Whoever enlists or is
engaged
within the United States or in any place subject to the jurisdiction
thereof, with
intent to serve in armed hostility against the United States, shall be fined
under
this
title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

Sturges v. Crowninsheld, 17 U.S. 122 (1819) "The powers given to congress by
the
constitution, may be divided into three classes: 1st. Those which are
national in
their nature, and which are vested in congress, as the sovereign power of
the
nation or Union. 2d. Those powers which are given to congress, and from the
exercise of which the states are expressly excluded. 3d. Those which are
given to
congress, and from the exercise of which the states are not excluded...
Under the
first class may be enumerated-the power to borrow money on the credit of the
United
States; to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several
states; to
provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin
of the
United States; to constitute tribunals inferior to the supreme court of the
United
States; to define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high
seas, and
offences against the law of nations; to declare war, grant letters of marque
and
reprisal, and to make rules concerning captures on land and water; to raise
and
support armies; to provide and maintain a navy; to provide for organizing,
arming
and disciplining the militia, c."

Houston v. Moore, 18 U.S. 1 (1820) "Congress has power to provide for
organizing,
arming, and disciplining them; and this power being unlimited, except in the
two
particulars of officering and training them, according to the discipline to
be
prescribed by Congress, it may be exercised to any extent that may be deemed
necessary by Congress. But as State militia, the power ofthe State
governments to
legislate on the same subjects, having existed prior to the formation of the
constitution, and not having been prohibited by that instrument, it remains
with
the States, subordinate nevertheless to the paramount law of the general
government, operating upon the same subject."

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824) "This shows that Congress considered the
power
to punish these offences as concurrent, and that it could be exercised by
the
States on the ground of their own inherent authority, as it is held that
Congress
cannot delegate any part of the criminal jurisdiction of the United States
to the
State tribunals. Again: the power to provide for organizing, arming, and
disciplining the militia, is a concurrent power, according to the same
principles."

Thurlow v. Com Of Mass., 46 U.S. 504 (1847) "It may be well, however, to
remark,
that in analogous cases, where, by the constitution of the United States,
power
over a particular subject is conferred on Congress without any prohibition
to 

[CTRL] A Patriot Christmas (A poem)

1999-12-22 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

A Militia Man's Christmas
by Santa Zog


'Twas the night before Christmas, and in the condominium
Not a patriot was stirring, not even a Davidian.
The duffels were hung by the chimney with care,
In hopes that Mark from Michigan soon would be there;
The troops were nestled all snug in their beds,
While visions of Ruby Ridge danced in their heads;
And Linda in her camos and I in my helmet,
Had just settled down to sleep for a bit,
When out on the lawn there arose such a clamor,
I grabbed a revolver and pulled back the hammer.
Away to the window I flew to defend
My home from the ravenous liberal fiends.
The moon on the breast of the new-fallen snow
Made it seem like the body of Janet Reno.
When, what through my wandering scope should appear,
But a miniature troop-carrier, complete with full gear,
With a fatigue-clad driver, so lively and sharp,
I knew 'twas from Michigan--the guy they called Mark.
More rapid than jack-booted thugs did he come,
And he ranted and raved and at the mouth he did foam.
"Now, U.N.! Now, Clinton! Now Brady and Schroeder!
"On, Boutros! On, Hillary! On, New World Order!
To the compound at Waco! To the OKC faxes!
Now dash away! dash away, all income taxes!"
Like liberals, wanting to have one-world rule,
At the thought of banning our guns do so drool,
So too did Mr. Koernke drive to our door
Avoiding the land mines I'd placed there before.
And then, in a twinkling, I saw that he'd drawn
A Chinese assault weapon right there on my lawn.
As I readied a grenade and was turning around,
With a fiery cascade, he shot my door down.
He was dressed all in green from his cap to his trousers
And his clothes were all tarnished with reloading powder.
Three Sam Brownes full of ammo were slung on his back,
And he looked like Attila getting ready to sack.
His eyes--how they twinkled! His mustache how Nazi!
His cheeks were like roses, his demeanor so ROTC!
His droll little mouth was all set to grin
As if a microchip had been emplanted within.
The stock of his AK he gripped tight with care
As a thin whisp of smoke rose from it through the air.
He had a broad face and a little round belly,
That shook, when his videos were played on the telly.
He was chubby and plump, a right jolly old sort,
The kind that would kill government agents for sport.
A wink of his eye and a twist of his hairs
Suggested to me there was no light on upstairs.
He spoke not a word, but went straight to his work
And rearmed all our weapons; then turned with a jerk,
And laying his finger on his safety release,
He reentered the confines of his great armored beast.
He turned on the engine and away did he speed,
Following street signs that had been secretly keyed.
But I heard him exclaim, ere he turned round the corner,
"God bless the Republic, and Death to the New World Order!"

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] US Code and the militias

1999-12-21 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

18 USC 2383 Rebellion or insurrection Whoever incites, sets on foot,
assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority
of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or
both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

18 USC 2384 Seditious conspiracy If two or more persons in any State or
Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States,
conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of
the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the
authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of
any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any
property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall
each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or
both.

18 USC 2385 Advocating overthrow of Government Whoever knowingly or
willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity,
desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of
the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or
Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein,
by force or violence, or by the
assassination of any officer of any such government; or Whoever, with intent
to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints,
publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly
displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the
duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying
any government in the United States by
force or violence, or attempts to do so; or Whoever organizes or helps or
attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach,
advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government
by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any
such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof -
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or
both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any
department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his
conviction. If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in
this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the
United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next
following his conviction. As used in this section, the terms ''organizes''
and ''organize'', with respect to any society, group, or assembly of
persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units,
and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units
of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

18 USC 2389 Recruiting for service against United States Whoever recruits
soldiers or sailors within the United States, or in any place subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, to engage in armed hostility against the same; or
Whoever opens within the United States, or in any place subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, a recruiting station for the enlistment of such
soldiers or sailors to serve in any manner in
armed hostility against the United States - Shall be fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

18 USC 2390 Enlistment to serve against United States Whoever enlists or is
engaged within the United States or in any place subject to the jurisdiction
thereof, with intent to serve in armed hostility against the United States,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or
both.

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL 

[CTRL] Y2K opportunity

1999-12-16 Thread True Patriot

 -Caveat Lector-

Don't wait for Y2K!
Time is already running out!
Move quick on this deal!

Hello fellow patriots, militia members, Clinton loathers, UN despisers, 2nd
Amendment touters, NWO fighters, black-helicopter monitors, and other
conspiracy theorists.

As you may or may not know Y2K is coming, along with (suposedly):
1) martial law (or marshall law for some of you)
2) suspension of the Constitution
3) misuse of Executive Orders to give overarching power to FEMA
4) targetting of "militia/patriot" members for false charges by (insert name
of law enforcement agency here)
5) introduction of UN troops already training in secret bases to enforce the
aforementioned martial law
6) establishment of the New World Order in the form of the One World
Government

But, as is the case with almost all such grandiose doom and gloom
predictions

IT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!

So before you hunker in your bunker, turn on your shortwave radios and light
your already short fuses, time to invest in the future.

Put a down payment on an excuse, alibi, rationale, or other means to explain
away why your paranoid rants turn out to be DEAD BANG WRONG!

There are loads to choose from! Popular ones include:

1) Our "knowledge" of the conspiracy ensured that it did not happen because
"they" knew we'd be ready.
2) Nothing happened on 1/1/00 so we will get complacent. But 1/2/00, look
out!
3) The UN troops were ready to march in and take over, but the tanks were
driven by men who REFUSED to ask for directions and instead invaded Canada.
4) When we said Clinton was going to declare Martial Law, we meant he'd
declare the CBS show the best of the season!
5) That crazy Pope Gregory reset the calendar and threw us for a loop.
(Leads into the classic "Papist Plot" conspiracy extension pack. Sold
seperately.)
6) Sure it didn't happen at y2k, but we are TOTALLY ready for y3k!
7) The takeover/martial law et. al. really DID happen. This is just the
dream, or are we the dreamer? (Lewis Caroll collection available now at
www.WackJobConspirayMetaphors.com)
8) The entire armed plot couldn't stop giggling when Clinton said he'd
declare himself "dictator".
9) The UN realized that it wouldn't be able to set up a One World Government
lead by a guy named "Kofi".

and finally

10) WE WERE WRONG FOR CRYING WOLF!

Others available. Call for pricing.

Yes, you too can be the envy of your militia cell as you explain away the
last 18 months (or longer) of paranoid rants that never came to fruition.
Dazzle your fellow "patriots"! Amaze "common law grand juries" for hours!

Best of all, there is a 0% money back guarentee. If there really IS all this
crap crashing down on January 1, 2000 this company and its employees will
marched off to the "UN concentration camps". But YOU will have the warm,
fuzzy feeling of knowing you are right as you drive a Ryder truck full of
explosives into the UN Secretariat building. Isn't that just as good as
money (especially if you figure the Federal Reserve Notes are not "real'
money, and the US is bankrupt, and you can redeem your "straw man" just by
following)?

So contact us today! Special for the Holidays: Buy one excuse for Y2K not
become the harbinger of the Apocalypse and we'll throw in one of the
following lame explinations at NO extra charge!

1) "Really, honey. This naked woman walked into our bedroom and said 'Sleep
with me or I'll die.'"
2) "It wasn't me. It was the dog."
3) "No I am not bitchy because of PMS! Why do you think it is PMS? Do you
think every opinionated woman has PMS? Where the hell is my frying pan."
(Note: three day waiting period on aquiring this one)
4) "That was the dog too."

Contact us at:

(Address erased by Project Echelon)

Hurry, supplies are limited!

__
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om