[CTRL] Does it matter who wins the White House?

2000-11-06 Thread Kris Millegan

-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.electnet.org/dsp_essay.cfm?intID=22
Click Here: A HREF="http://www.electnet.org/dsp_essay.cfm?intID=22"Insider
Essays/A
-
Insider Essays

Does it matter who wins the White House? by Chuck Baldwin
According to a recent survey, a whopping 75% of the American people believe
the answer to the above question is no. The Portrait of America poll
conducted July 23 reveals that most Americans believe it really doesn't make
much difference whether George W. Bush or Al Gore is elected president of the
United States this November. They might be right.
A study of the positions of Gore and Bush show more similarities than one
would expect to find. For instance, both Gore and Bush support U.S. funded UN
"peacekeeping" missions. Both men support participation in the WTO by the
United States and China. Both Bush and Gore favor continued funding of the
IMF and World Bank. They both support granting permanent Most Favored Nation
trade status to Communist Red China. They both support the expansion of NATO
and supported Clinton's illegal war against Kosovo. In fact, Bush even
intervened to block a congressional vote that would have placed a time limit
on the U.S. presence in Kosovo.
Bush and Gore both support enacting additional gun control laws. The argument
on this issue (like most issues) is only one of degree, not direction. Both
Bush and Gore support Clinton's "don't ask, don't tell" policy allowing
homosexuals to serve in the armed forces. They both favor an increased role
for the federal Department of Education. Neither Bush nor Gore wants to
abolish the National Endowment for the Arts. In fact, Laura Bush said that
one of her top priorities as First Lady would be to expand federal funding
for the N.E.A.
Neither George W. Bush nor Al Gore has revealed any inclination to get China
out of the Panama Canal or to restore an American presence there. Neither man
has indicated any interest in protecting our borders from the current
onslaught of illegal immigration. Neither man has expressed any desire to
abolish Affirmative Action. Both Bush and Gore support the Legal Services
Corporation. I could go on, but you get the point.
The vast majority of the American people can see for themselves that both
major parties are spitting images of each other. Neither party offers the
American people a change of direction. Even on fiscal matters, the
differences have mostly to do with rhetoric and less to do with reality.
While preaching conservatism and tax reduction, Republicans have increased
federal spending by over one-third since they took control of congress in
1995. According to a new Cato Institute study, the current 106th Congress
(controlled by Republicans in both chambers) "is well on its way to becoming
the largest-spending Congress on domestic social programs since the late
1970's." The study's authors, Stephen Slivinski and Stephen Moore, say the
reason is the "inability or unwillingness of Republicans to eliminate
virtually any government program."
According to the study, instead of eliminating 95 social programs, which the
GOP promised to do, they have increased federal spending for those programs
by a combined 13%. Steep spending increases have been granted to programs
ranging from AmeriCorps to Goals 2000.
Democrats must be green with envy at how Republicans can be so liberal with
our tax dollars and yet enjoy such widespread support among people who
profess to be conservative. I must admit; I marvel at this, too.


© 1996-2000 ElectNet | This site created and maintained by e-Media
-
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Does it matter who wins the White House?

2000-07-31 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

In a message dated 07/30/2000 7:53:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

 According to a recent survey, a whopping 75% of the
 American people believe the answer to the above question is
 no. The Portrait of America poll conducted July 23 reveals
 that most Americans believe it really doesn’t make much
 difference whether George W. Bush or Al Gore is elected
 president of the United States this November. They might be
 right. 

Well, it does.  Shrub and the Bush family mafia will have the entire
framework of the environmental protection we still have left dismantled in
six months.  The oil companies will be in the Alaska Wildlife Reserve before
that.  It wasn't until I read Molly Ivins' "SHRUB," that I realized what a
wiley politician Shrub really is.  In a state with a weak gornernorship, he
managed to annihilate the entire environmental structure in a remarkably
short time.  I know Gore isn't what I want to be the keeper of the green, but
if we can't have Nader, Gore beats Shrub.  If only because he's not so
efficient in the matter.  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Does it matter who wins the White House?

2000-07-31 Thread Mrs. Jela Jovanovic, Secretary General

Dear friends

Would you please send to me this article again.
Jela
-Original Message-
From: Prudence L. Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, July 31, 2000 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Does it matter who wins the White House?


æ¹‰æ„ æ´ ç¥æ…³æ•§æ ç‘¡æ‘¥ã€ â¼·ã€³ãˆ¯ã€°â€°ã¨·ãŒµã„ºâ€¹äµä” ç¡æ•´æ¹²ä 
ç¥¡æ¥¬æ¡§â´æ¥”æ•­â€¬æ©—æ‰°ä²ä½â¹Œä½ƒàµçœ æ¥²æ•´ã©³à¨à¨ã°¼ä„ æ£ç‰¯æ¥¤æ®ç 
â¯â¡æ•²æ•£ç‘®çŒ ç‰µæ•¶â±¹æ„ çœ æ½¨ç°æ¹©â§ã”·â€¥æ™¯ç æ•¨à¨ä„ æ•­
æ¥²æ…£â®æ•°ç¯æ•¬æˆ æ±¥æ•©æ•¶ç æ•¨æ„ ç®æ•·â²æ½´ç æ•¨æ„ æ½¢æ•¶ç„ 
æ•µç‘³æ½©â®ç©à¨æ¸ â¹¯å æ•¨å€ ç‰¯ç‰´æ¥¡â´æ™¯ä„ æ•­æ¥²æ…£ç€ æ±¯â¬æ½£æ‘®æµæ•´â¤ç• 
祬㈠″敲敶污൳
æ¡´ç‘¡æ´ ç¯â´æµç‰¥æ©æ¹¡â³æ•¢æ¥¬ç™¥â¥ç‘©çˆ æ…¥æ±¬â¹æ½¤ç¥î‰®é¦€â´æ…­æ•«æ´ 
æµàµ¨â€ æ¥¤æ™¦ç‰¥æ¹¥æ•£çœ æ•¨æ¡´ç‰¥äœ æ½¥æ²â¥â¹—äˆ çµâ¨ç‰¯ä„ â¬æ½‡æ•²æ¤ 
⁳汥捥整൤
ç‰°ç¥æ‘©æ¹¥â´æ™¯ç æ•¨å” æ¥®æ•´â¤ç‘“ç‘¡ç¥ç æ¥¨â³æ½Žæ•¶æ‰­ç‰¥â€®æ¡”ç¥¥æ´ æ©ç‘¨æˆ 
൥
æ¥²æ¡§â¹´ã¸ à´¾à´ åœ æ±¥â±¬æ¤ â´æ½¤ç¥â€®åŒ ç‰¨æ‰µæ„ æ‘®ç æ•¨äˆ çµâ¨æ…¦æ¥­ç¥¬æ´ 
æ™¡æ…©çœ æ±©â¬æ…¨æ•¶ç æ•¨æ” ç‘®ç‰©àµ¥æ˜ æ…²æ•­æ½·æ­²æ¼ 
â¦æ¡´â¥æ¹¥æ¥¶æ½²æµ®æ¹¥æ…´â¬ç‰°ç‘¯æ¥æ¥´æ¹¯çœ â¥ç‘³æ±©â¬æ…¨æ•¶æ° æ™¥â´æ¥¤æµ³æ¹¡æ±´
æ‘¥æ¤ àµ®çŒ ç¡©æ´ æ¹¯æ¡´â¹³â€ æ¡”â¥æ¥¯â¬æ½£ç­æ¹¡æ•©â³æ¥·æ±¬æˆ â¥æ¹©ç æ•¨ä„ 
æ…¬æ­³â¡æ¥—æ‘¬æ¥¬æ•¦åˆ ç¥ç‰¥æ•¶æˆ æ™¥ç‰¯àµ¥ç æ…¨â¹´â€ ç‘‰çœ 
ç¡â®â´æ¹µæ¥´â¬â‰æ•²æ‘¡ä´ æ±¯ç¥¬ä¤ æ¥¶ç®â€§åŒ¢å‰ˆä‰•âˆ¬ç æ…¨â´â‰æ•²æ±¡ç©©æ‘¥
çœ æ…¨â´àµ¡çœ æ±©ç¥¥ç€ æ±¯ç‘©æ©æ…©â®æ¡“ç•²â¢æ•²æ±¡ç¥¬æ¤ â¹³â€ æ¹‰æ„ çŒ æ…´æ•´çœ 
ç‘©â¨â¡æ•·æ­¡æœ ç‰¯æ•®æ¹²ç‰¯æ¡³ç©â€¬æ•¨à¨æ…­æ…®æ•§â¤æ½´æ„ 
æ¹®æ¡©æ±©ç‘¡â¥æ¡´â¥æ¹¥æ¥´æ•²æ” ç™®ç‰©æ¹¯æ•­ç‘®æ±¡çŒ ç‰´æµç•´æ•²æ¤ â®â¡æ•²æ…­
æ­²æ‰¡ç¥¬à¨æ¡³ç‰¯â´æ¥´æ•­â€®ä¤ æ¬ æ½®â·æ½‡æ•²æ¤ æ¹³ç§çœ æ…¨â´â‰æ…·ç‘®ç â¯æ•¢ç 
æ•¨æ¬ æ•¥æ•°â²æ™¯ç æ•¨æœ æ•²æ¹¥â€¬ç•¢àµ´æ¤ â¦æ•·æŒ æ¹¡ç§æ  ç™¡â¥æ…Žæ•¤â±²äœ 
ç‰¯â¥æ•¢ç‘¡â³æ¡“ç•²â¹¢â€ æ™‰æ¼ æ±®â¹æ•¢æ…£çµâ¥æ•¨çŒ§æ¸
ç‘¯çŒ àµ¯æ” æ™¦æ©æ•©ç‘®æ¤ â®æ¡´â¥æ…­ç‘´ç‰¥â€®å€ ç•²ç¥¤à¨à¨ä„¼ä  ä•’ãµ†æ 
¢ç‘´ã©°â¼¯ç·â¹·ç‘£æ±²æ¼®æ²âˆ¯çœ¾ç·æŒ®ç‰´â¹¬ç‰¯ã±§ä„¯à´¾ä ä…ä…Œä…’ä¥”ä¹â˜ ä 
å‰ä±ƒä¥ä•àµ’ã´ ã´½ã´½ã´½ã´½à´½äŒ å‰”âŒç©æ„ æ ç©ç•£ç³æ½©â®â€¦
æ¹©æ½¦æµ²ç‘¡æ½©æ…®â¬ç¡¥æ¡£æ¹¡æ•§æ° ç©â¹´å€ æ½²æ•³ç¥¬æ¥´æ¥ºæ®ç€ 
潲慰慧摮捩਍捳敲摥⁳牡⁥湵敷捬浯摥‮畓獢慴据靥潮⁴潳灡戭硯湩靧汰慥敳‡å
 æ•¨æ•³æ„ æ•²à¨æ½³æ‘²æ‘©æ´ ç‘¡æ•´ç²æ„ æ‘®âœ æ½£ç®æ¥°
æ…²ç¥£ç æ•¨ç‰¯â¹çž—ç‘©â¨ç‘©â³æ…­ç¥®æ  æ±¡âµ¦ç‰´ç‘µç¨â€¬æ¥­âµ³à¨æ¥¤æ•²ç‘£æ½©ç®æ„ 
æ‘®æ¼ ç‘µæ¥²æ¡§â´ç‰¦ç•¡ç¤æ¦—â³çµæ‘¥ç€ æ±¯ç‘©æ©æ±¡ç¥¬æˆ 
â¹æ¥¤æ™¦ç‰¥æ¹¥â´ç‰§ç•¯ç°çœ ç‘©àµ¨æ´ æ©¡ç‰¯æ„ æ‘®æ´ æ¹©ç‰¯æ” æ™¦æ¥ç´çŒ ç‰°æ…¥
â¤æ¡´æ½²æµæ½¨ç‘µç æ•¨çŒ æ•°ç‘£ç•²â­æ™¯ç æµ©â¥æ¹¡â¤æ¡´ç•¯æ¡§â¹´à¨æ¡”ç‘¡æˆ 
æ¥¥æ®çŒ æ¥¡â±¤äŒ å‰”æŒç™©ç¥æ¸ â¯æ¹¥æ½¤ç²æµ¥æ¹¥â´æ½´ç æ•¨ç˜ æ±¡æ‘©ç‘©â¹æ™¯ç€ 
ç¯ç´â€¬æ¹¡àµ¤æ„ ç¬ç¥¡â³ç•³æ§ç¥ç´ç â¯æ•²æ‘¡ç‰¥ã­³æˆ â¥
æ…·ç¥²æ¼ â¦æ¡·ç‘¡ç¤ ç•¯çˆ æ…¥â¹¤äŒ å‰”âŒæ¥§æ•¶â³æ½®à¨ç‰£æ‘¥æ¹¥æ•£ç 
â¯æ½ˆæ½¬æ…£çµâ´æ•¤æ¥®æ±¡æ„ æ‘®æ¸ ç©¡â©â³æ•®æ‘¥æ¸ ç‘¯æ„ ç°ç¥¬à´®à´ ä° ç‘¥ç” 
â³æ±°æ…¥æ•³æˆ â¥æ¥£æ¥¶â¬æ¹¡â¤ç¡æ„ ç¬ç¥¡â±³äŒ ç™¡æ…¥â´æ•Œç‘£ç‰¯à´®ã´
㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽ഽä„
 æ²æ¥¨æ•¶â³ç™æ¥¡æ…¬æ±¢â¥ç‘¡à´ºæ  
ç‘´ã©°â¼¯æ•°æ¡â¹¨æ…¥æ•³æ°®æ½³ç‘¦æŒ®æµ¯æ„¯æ²æ¥¨æ•¶â½³ç‘£æ±²æ ®æµ´àµ¬
ä„¼ä  ä•’ãµ†æ ¢ç‘´ã©°â¼¯æ•°æ¡â¹¨æ…¥æ•³æ°®æ½³ç‘¦æŒ®æµ¯æ„¯æ²æ¥¨æ•¶â½³ç‘£æ±²æ 
®æµ´â‰¬ä„¾æ²æ¥¨æ•¶â³æ™¯à¨å‘ƒä±’å€ä……ä¡ƒä”®åâ¹…åŒä™â¹”ä½ƒã±ä„¯à´¾à´ æ  
瑴㩰⼯牡档癩⹥慪⹢牯⽧瑣汲汀獩獴牥⹶潡⹬潣⽭਍ã°
⁁剈䙅∽瑨灴⼺愯捲楨敶樮扡漮杲振牴䁬楬瑳敳癲愮汯挮浯∯挾牴㱬䄯ാã´
 
㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽㴽ഽå
 畳獢牣扩⁥
æ½´äŒ æ¹¯ç³ç‰©æ¡â¹æ¡”æ½¥ç¥²åˆ ç¥æ…¥æ²â¨æ¥Œç‘³ä›å‰”åµŒçŒ 
æ¹¥â¤æµ¥æ¥¡ã©¬à¨å•“å‚å‰ƒä‰‰â…å‘ƒä±’å¬ æ½´å´ºä° 
å‰å”å‰…ä–ä¥Œå‘“ä•“å™’ä„®ä±äŒ®äµà¨à¨æ½”å” çŽæ‰µæ³æ¥²æ•¢ç â¯æ½ƒç®æ¥°æ…²ç¥£å 
æ•¨ç‰¯â¹æ•’æ•³ç‰¡æ¡£ä° ç©
å­´å‘ƒä±’âæ•³æ‘®æ” æ…­æ±©à´ºåŒ ä‰ä½Žä™†äŒ 
å‰”âŒç‘›ã©¯âä¥Œå‘“ä•“å™’ä±€å‰å”å‰…â¹–ä½â¹Œä½ƒàµà´ ä¼ àµ­

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTE

[CTRL] Does it matter who wins the White House?

2000-07-30 Thread Bill Richer

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Does it matter who wins the White House?

By Chuck Baldwin

July 28, 2000

According to a recent survey, a whopping 75% of the
American people believe the answer to the above question is
no. The Portrait of America poll conducted July 23 reveals
that most Americans believe it really doesn’t make much
difference whether George W. Bush or Al Gore is elected
president of the United States this November. They might be
right.

A study of the positions of Gore and Bush show more
similarities than one would expect to find. For instance,
both Gore and Bush support U.S. funded UN "peacekeeping"
missions. Both men support participation in the WTO by the
United States and China. Both Bush and Gore favor continued
funding of the IMF and World Bank. They both support
granting permanent Most Favored Nation trade status to
Communist Red China. They both support the expansion of
NATO and supported Clinton’s illegal war against Kosovo. In
fact, Bush even intervened to block a congressional vote
that would have placed a time limit on the U.S. presence in
Kosovo.

Bush and Gore both support enacting additional gun control
laws. The argument on this issue (like most issues) is only
one of degree, not direction. Both Bush and Gore support
Clinton’s "don’t ask, don’t tell" policy allowing
homosexuals to serve in the armed forces. They both favor
an increased role for the federal Department of Education.
Neither Bush nor Gore wants to abolish the National
Endowment for the Arts. In fact, Laura Bush said that one
of her top priorities as First Lady would be to expand
federal funding for the N.E.A.

Neither George W. Bush nor Al Gore has revealed any
inclination to get China out of the Panama Canal or to
restore an American presence there. Neither man has
indicated any interest in protecting our borders from the
current onslaught of illegal immigration. Neither man has
expressed any desire to abolish Affirmative Action. Both
Bush and Gore support the Legal Services Corporation. I
could go on, but you get the point.

The vast majority of the American people can see for
themselves that both major parties are spitting images of
each other. Neither party offers the American people a
change of direction. Even on fiscal matters, the
differences have mostly to do with rhetoric and less to do
with reality.

While preaching conservatism and tax reduction, Republicans
have increased federal spending by over one-third since
they took control of congress in 1995. According to a new
Cato Institute study, the current 106th Congress
(controlled by Republicans in both chambers) "is well on
its way to becoming the largest-spending Congress on
domestic social programs since the late 1970’s." The
study’s authors, Stephen Slivinski and Stephen Moore, say
the reason is the "inability or unwillingness of
Republicans to eliminate virtually any government program."


According to the study, instead of eliminating 95 social
programs, which the GOP promised to do, they have increased
federal spending for those programs by a combined 13%.
Steep spending increases have been granted to programs
ranging from AmeriCorps to Goals 2000.

Democrats must be green with envy at how Republicans can be
so liberal with our tax dollars and yet enjoy such
widespread support among people who profess to be
conservative. I must admit; I marvel at this, too.



*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!


**
***
A vote for Bush or Gore is a vote to continue Clinton policies!
A vote for Buchanan is a vote to continue America!
Therefore a vote for Gore or Bush is a wasted vote for America!
Don't waste your vote!  Vote for Patrick Buchanan!


Today, candor compels us to admit that our vaunted two-party system is a
snare and a delusion, a fraud upon the nation. Our two parties have become
nothing but two wings of the same bird of prey...
Patrick Buchanan

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you