Re: [CTRL] THE HISTORY OF THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY

1999-07-17 Thread M.A. Johnson

 -Caveat Lector-

Well my computer has been 'ill' ...


This is total and absolute nonsense:

Das GOAT wrote:
snip

1901
"The Spindletop [oil] gusher in Beaumont, Texas, gives
 John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Trust its first
 major competition.  The Beaumont Field contains more
 oil than the rest of the United States combined ... The
  Gulf Oil Co. has its beginnings as [the investors] get
  backing from [Anglophile] banker Andrew W. Mellon ...
 "More than half the world's oil output is from Russia's
  Baku fields developed by Ludwig Nobel, brother of
  dynamite inventor Alfred Nobel, and by
snip

   1902:
   "'History of the Standard Oil Company' by Ida Minerva Tarbell
appears in McClure's magazine installments, revealing that
John D. Rockefeller controls 90 percent of US oil-refining
capacity ... US Steel Co. has two-thirds of US

snip

MJ:
Anti-Trust serves business interests who cannot compete in
the marketplace period.  This propaganda nonsense about
monopolies and 'Robber Barons' is bunk.  Read and research
rather than regurgitate the indoctrinated myths.



The Ghost of John D. Rockefeller
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo


At the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on competitiveness
in the computer industry last March, Microsoft chairman Bill
Gates was compared to the infamous 'robber baron' John D.
Rockefeller and his company likened to the Standard Oil Company
of the late nineteenth century.  Federal Trade Commission
chairman Robert Pitofsky made a similar analogy in a Washington
Post op-ed, where he self-servingly argued for more money for
antitrust investigations.  Gates's competitors, too, are
working diligently to implant the Rockefeller analogy in the
public consciousness.

Even the Wall Street Journal has joined in this attack; reporter
Alan Murray claimed in a page-one article that Gates supposedly
enjoys 'monopoly power' that 'even John D. Rockefeller could
envy'.

Microsoft's critics are right.  There are many similarities
between Bill Gates's company and the old Standard Oil
organization.

Like Gates, Rockefeller was the victim of a political assault
for the 'sin' of rapid innovation, a vast expansion of output,
and rapidly declining prices -- just the opposite of what the
antitrust laws ostensibly police.  As with Microsoft, the
political attack on Standard Oil was launched by less-efficient
rivals who wanted to achieve through the political process what
they failed to achieve in the marketplace.

There is indeed a lesson to be learned from Rockefeller's antitrust
ordeal, but it is not the one Microsoft's critics have in mind.


Rockefeller's Economic Legacy

The firm of Rockefeller, Andrews, and Flagler was formed in 1865
and was a marvel of efficiency because of Rockefeller's
penny-pinching ways and the managerial genius of his brother
William. (1)  Even Rockefeller's harshest critic, the muckraking
journalist Ida Tarbell (whose brother's firm -- the Pure Oil
Company -- was driven from the market by the more efficient
Standard Oil), described the company as 'a marvelous example of
economy'. (2)

The efficiencies of economies of scale and vertical integration
caused the prices of refined petroleum to fall from over 30 cents
a gallon in 1869 to 10 cents by 1874 and to 5.9 cents by 1897.
During the same period, Rockefeller reduced his average costs
from 3 cents to 0.29 cents per gallon.

The production of refined petroleum increased rapidly throughout
this period of increasing dominance by Standard Oil as well, as
increased competition was provided by Associated Oil and Gas,
Texaco, the Gulf Company, and 147 independent refineries that had
sprung into existence by 1911 -- the year in which the government
forced the breakup of Standard Oil.

Contrary to popular mythology, Standard Oil's market share
DECLINED from 88 percent in 1890 to 64 percent by 1911. Because
of intense competition the company's oil production as a percentage
of total market supply had declined to a mere 11 percent in 1911,
down from 34 percent in 1898.

Moreover, Standard Oil's decades-long price-cutting was not
'predatory pricing' -- the theoretical practice of pricing below
average cost to drive competitors from the market and establish a
monopoly.  Any business person would be a fool to intentionally
lose money by pricing below average cost for decades.  As economist
John McGee concluded in his classic analysis of the Standard Oil
case, "whatever else has been said about [it], the old Standard
organization was seldom criticized for making less money when it
could readily have made more" through other means. (3)

Indeed, Standard Oil never came close to cornering the market; by
the time the antitrust case against it was filed in 1906, it had
hundreds of competitors.  Nevertheless, Standard Oil was convicted
of violating the antitrust laws in 1911 and partially dissolved,
despite the fact that the courts conducted no economic analysis of
its conduct and performance.  That 

Re: [CTRL] THE HISTORY OF THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY

1999-07-17 Thread Kris Millegan

 -Caveat Lector-

Read what was written and what you posted.

90% control does not mean output.

Dogmatic blindness?

This propaganda nonsense about
monopolies and 'Robber Barons' is bunk.

Whether they be 'staged' or productive monopolies, the activities of
corporate interests has been detrimental towards the common good.

One's Robber Baron is anothers boss, another's father.

Yes, there are many sides and ways to perceive, but by their fruits ye shall
know.

The basic thrust of Goats post was right on and shows how political, economic
and social forces are used by "interests" to advance their self-interests.

MHO

OM
K

In a message dated 7/17/99 7:02:22 AM, you wrote:


This is total and absolute nonsense:

Das GOAT wrote:
snip

1901
"The Spindletop [oil] gusher in Beaumont, Texas, gives
 John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Trust its first
 major competition.  The Beaumont Field contains more
 oil than the rest of the United States combined ... The
  Gulf Oil Co. has its beginnings as [the investors] get
  backing from [Anglophile] banker Andrew W. Mellon ...
 "More than half the world's oil output is from Russia's
  Baku fields developed by Ludwig Nobel, brother of
  dynamite inventor Alfred Nobel, and by
snip

   1902:
   "'History of the Standard Oil Company' by Ida Minerva Tarbell
appears in McClure's magazine installments, revealing that
John D. Rockefeller controls 90 percent of US oil-refining
capacity ... US Steel Co. has two-thirds of US

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] THE HISTORY OF THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY

1999-07-17 Thread M.A. Johnson

 -Caveat Lector-

Kris Millegan wrote:
 Read what was written and what you posted.
 90% control does not mean output.
 Dogmatic blindness?
MJ:
Standard Oil's market percentage PEAKED at 88%.
Reaching such a level is NOT a monopoly NOR does it
imply/infer/mean such a level was sustained for
any length of time.


MJ:
 This propaganda nonsense about
  monopolies and 'Robber Barons' is bunk.
Kris Millegan wrote:
  Whether they be 'staged' or productive monopolies,
  the activities of corporate interests has been
  detrimental towards the common good.

MJ:
There are two (2) types of monopoly; coercive and natural.
Coercive REQUIRES Government to ensure its existence, the
other has NEVER existed.

Kris Millegan wrote:
 One's Robber Baron is anothers boss, another's father.
 Yes, there are many sides and ways to perceive, but by
 their fruits ye shall know.

The basic thrust of Goats post was right on and shows
how political, economic and social forces are used by
"interests" to advance their self-interests.

MJ:
EVERY decision by EVERY individual is made in their self-interest.


Regard$,
--MJ

If all that Americans want is security, they can go to prison.
They'll have enough to eat, a bed and a roof over their heads.
But if an American wants to preserve his dignity and his equality
as a human being, he must not bow his neck to any dictatorial
government. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1949

DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] THE HISTORY OF THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY

1999-07-17 Thread William Hugh Tunstall

 -Caveat Lector-

Thank you, Goat, for the excellent post. I couldn't agree more!
Best wishes,
Wm

On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, Kris Millegan wrote:

  -Caveat Lector-

 Read what was written and what you posted.

 90% control does not mean output.

 Dogmatic blindness?

 This propaganda nonsense about
 monopolies and 'Robber Barons' is bunk.

 Whether they be 'staged' or productive monopolies, the activities of
 corporate interests has been detrimental towards the common good.

 One's Robber Baron is anothers boss, another's father.

 Yes, there are many sides and ways to perceive, but by their fruits ye shall
 know.

 The basic thrust of Goats post was right on and shows how political, economic
 and social forces are used by "interests" to advance their self-interests.

 MHO

 OM
 K

 In a message dated 7/17/99 7:02:22 AM, you wrote:

 
 This is total and absolute nonsense:
 
 Das GOAT wrote:
 snip
 
 1901
 "The Spindletop [oil] gusher in Beaumont, Texas, gives
  John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Trust its first
  major competition.  The Beaumont Field contains more
  oil than the rest of the United States combined ... The
   Gulf Oil Co. has its beginnings as [the investors] get
   backing from [Anglophile] banker Andrew W. Mellon ...
  "More than half the world's oil output is from Russia's
   Baku fields developed by Ludwig Nobel, brother of
   dynamite inventor Alfred Nobel, and by
 snip
 
1902:
"'History of the Standard Oil Company' by Ida Minerva Tarbell
 appears in McClure's magazine installments, revealing that
 John D. Rockefeller controls 90 percent of US oil-refining
 capacity ... US Steel Co. has two-thirds of US

 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
 screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
 and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
 frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
 spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
 gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
 be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
 nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om


DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] THE HISTORY OF THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY

1999-07-16 Thread Kris Millegan

 -Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.history.rochester.edu/fuels/tarbell/MAIN.HTM
A HREF="http://www.history.rochester.edu/fuels/tarbell/MAIN.HTM"THE HISTORY
OF THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY
/A
-
THE HISTORY OF THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY

BY

IDA M. TARBELL



CONVERTED TO ELECTRONIC FORMAT BY NALINDA SAPUKOTANA AT UNIVERSITY OF
ROCHESTER



TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
PREFACE
CHAPTER 1

PAGES 1 THRU 20
PAGES 21 THRU 37
CHAPTER 2

PAGES 38 THRU 52
PAGES 53 THRU 69

CHAPTER 3

PAGES 70 THRU 85
PAGES 86 THRU 103
CHAPTER 4

PAGES 104 THRU 116
PAGES 117 THRU 128
CHAPTER 5

PAGES 129 THRU 147
PAGES 148 THRU 166
CHAPTER 6

PAGES 167 THRU 186
PAGES 187 THRU 207
CHAPTER 7

PAGES 208 THRU 224
PAGES 225 THRU 240
CHAPTER 8

PAGES 241 THRU 262
JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER
*The text was obtained from the book The History of The Standard Oil
Company by Ida M. Tarbell. Copyright, 1904, by McCLURE, PHILLIPS AND CO.



This was done as a student project in a class on the history of energy.
Comments are welcomed!
Maintained by Morris A. Pierce
26 June 1996
=
PREFACE


This work is the outgrowth of an effort on the part of the editors of
McClure's Magazine to deal concretely in their pages with the trust
question. In order that their readers might have a clear and succinct
notion of the processes by which a particular industry passes from the
control of the many to that of the few, they decided a few years ago to
publish a detailed narrative of the history of the growth of a
particular trust. The Standard Oil Trust was chosen for obvious reasons.
It was the first in the field, and it has furnished the methods, the
charter, and the traditions for its followers. It is the most perfectly
developed trust in existence; that is, it satisfies most nearly the
trust ideal of entire control of the commodity in which it deals. Its
vast profits have led its officers into various allied interests, such
as railroads, shipping, gas, copper, iron, steel, as well as into banks
and trust companies, and to the acquiring and solidifying of these
interests it has applied the methods used in building up the Oil Trust.
It has led in the struggle against legislation directed against
combinations. Its power in state and Federal government, in the press,
in the college, in the pulpit, is generally recognised. The perfection
of the organisation of the Standard, the ability and daring with which
it has carried out its projects, make it the pre-eminent trust of the
world-the one whose story is best fitted to illuminate the subject of
combinations of capital.

Another important consideration with the editors in deciding that the
Standard Oil Trust was the best adapted to illus-
[vii]






PREFACE


trate their meaning, was the fact that it is one of the very few
business organisations of the country whose growth could be traced in
trustworthy documents. There is in existence just such documentary
material for a history of the Standard Oil Company as there is for a
history of the Civil War or the French Revolution, or any other national
episode which has divided men's minds. This has come about largely from
the fact that almost constantly since its organisation in 1870 the
Standard Oil Company has been under investigation by the Congress of the
United States and by the Legislatures of various states in which it has
operated, on the suspicion that it was receiving rebates from the
railroads and was practising methods in restraint of free trade. In 1872
and again in 1876 it was before Congressional committees, in 1879 it was
before examiners of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and before
committees appointed by the Legislatures of New York and of Ohio for
investigating railroads. Its operations figured constantly in the debate
which led up to the creation of the Interstate Commerce Commission in
1887, and again and again since that time the Commission has been called
upon to examine directly or indirectly into its relation with the
railroads.

In 1888, in the Investigation of Trusts conducted by Congress and by the
state of New York, the Standard Oil Company was the chief subject for
examination. In the state of Ohio, between 1882 and 1892, a constant
warfare was waged against the Standard in the courts and Legislature,
resulting in several volumes of testimony. The Legislatures of many
other states concerned themselves with it. This hostile legislation
compelled the trust to separate into its component parts in 1892, but
investigation did not cease; indeed, in the last great industrial
inquiry, conducted by the Commission appointed by President McKinley,
the Standard Oil Company was constantly under discussion, and hundreds
of pages of
[viii]




Re: [CTRL] THE HISTORY OF THE STANDARD OIL COMPANY

1999-07-16 Thread Das GOAT

 -Caveat Lector-

warfare was waged against the Standard in the courts and Legislature,
resulting in several volumes of testimony. The Legislatures of many
other states concerned themselves with it. This hostile legislation
compelled the trust to separate into its component parts in 1892, but
investigation did not cease; indeed, in the last great industrial
inquiry, conducted by the Commission appointed by President McKinley--

After which --just a coincidence?-- McKinley was assassinated by a
"Polish-American anarchist," Leon Czolgosz.
The President's gunshot wounds "were not properly tended to" --how odd-- so
he actually died of gangrene a week later.
Cui bono?
Thanks to McKinley's death, faux-cowboy imperialist Teddy Roosevelt became
the youngest president in the nation's history (at the time) -- and the
plutocrats, now set free from anti-monopoly legislation, redoubled their
efforts to rule of the United States politically through ownership and
control of its economy (mirroring the oligarchic "Society of the Elect" of
the British Empire, partner of the Anglophile faction, but competitor of the
Rockefeller faction).

Same year, 1901:

 "Financiers Edward H. Harriman, Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb  Co, and
James Stillman of New York's National City Bank vie for control of the
railroads [brokered] by J. P. Morgan ... Stillman's City Bank is the
repository of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil Co. money ...
  "US Steel is created by [Rothschild agent] J. P. Morgan, who
underwrites a successful public offering of stock in the world's first $1
billion corporation, nets millions for himself for a few weeks' work, and
pays $492 million to Andrew Carnegie for about $80 million in real assets ...
Carnegie personally receives $225 million in 5 percent gold bonds and is
congratulated on being 'the richest man in the world' by Morgan, who merges
Carnegie's properties to create a company that controls 65 percent of US
steel-making capacity
  "The Spindletop [oil] gusher in Beaumont, Texas, gives John D.
Rockefeller's Standard Oil Trust its first major competition.  The Beaumont
Field contains more oil than the rest of the United States combined ... The
Gulf Oil Co. has its beginnings as
[the investors] get backing from [Anglophile] banker Andrew W. Mellon ...
  "More than half the world's oil output is from Russia's Baku fields
developed by Ludwig Nobel, brother of dynamite inventor Alfred Nobel, and by
Rothschild interests ...[However], the world's major supplier of petroleum is
[still] the United States, which will produce as much as two-thirds of the
world's export oil for 20 years...

1902:

 "'History of the Standard Oil Company' by Ida Minerva Tarbell appears in
McClure's magazine installments, revealing that John D. Rockefeller controls
90 percent of US oil-refining capacity ... US Steel Co. has two-thirds of US
steelmaking capacity.  Only public opinion and a sense of noblesse oblige
restrain its near-monopoly ...

Now, let's go back even further, to the context of the Anti-Trust Act in the
1890s.
Get a sense of the times.  Times no unlike our own, or the near future ...

1892
  Economic depression begins in the United States, but the country has
4000 millionaires, up from fewer than 20 in 1840.
  Democrats campaign on a platform opposing the McKinley Tariff Act of
1890 and re-elect Grover Cleveland ... Cleveland wins 46 percent of the
popular vote, [his opponent 43 percent], the Populist candidate 22 percent.
  Steel workers strike the Carnegie mill and are refused a union contract
by managing head Henry Cl;ay Frick who calls in Pinkerton guards to suppress
the strike. Men are shot on both sides ... Union organizers are dismissed and
the men go back to working their 12-hour shifts ...
   "American workmen are subjected to peril of life and limb as great as
a soldier in time of war," says [losing candidate, former] President Harrison.
   The Populist party polls more than a million votes in the US
presidential election as farmers register their protest against the railroads
and farm machine makers.
A presidential proclamation opens some 3 million acres of former
[Indian] lands in Oklahoma to settlement.
Shell Oil has its beginnings as English enterpreneur [and Rothschild
associate] Marcus Samuel, 57, sends his first tanker through the Suez Canal
... to break the Standard Oil monopoly in the Far East.

1893

 Economic depression continues in America as European investors
withdraw funds ... Wall Street stock prices take a sudden drop May 5, the
market collapses June 27 ... [The] depression ... will continue for 4 more
years.
 The Pullman Palace Car Co reduces wages by one-fourth, obliging
workers to labor for almost nothing while charging them full rents in company
housing ... and charging them inflated prices at company stores.
 The American Railway Union is founded by socialist Eugene Victor
Debs ...
 Britain's Labour