daily CVS update output
Updating src tree: P src/distrib/common/Makefile.bootcd P src/distrib/common/bootimage/Makefile.bootimage P src/distrib/sets/lists/comp/mi P src/external/bsd/nvi/docs/USD.doc/vi.ref/Makefile P src/external/bsd/nvi/docs/USD.doc/vi.ref/vi.ref P src/sbin/cgdconfig/params.c P src/share/doc/usd/18.msdiffs/Makefile P src/share/doc/usd/18.msdiffs/ms.diffs P src/share/doc/usd/19.memacros/Makefile P src/share/doc/usd/19.memacros/intro.me P src/share/doc/usd/20.meref/Makefile P src/share/doc/usd/20.meref/ref.me P src/sys/dev/pci/if_alc.c P src/sys/dev/pci/if_alcreg.h P src/sys/dev/pci/if_athn_pci.c P src/sys/external/isc/atheros_hal/dist/ar5210/ar5210_reset.c P src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c P src/usr.bin/mail/USD.doc/Makefile P src/usr.bin/mail/USD.doc/mail0.nr P src/usr.sbin/makefs/cd9660.c P src/usr.sbin/makefs/makefs.8 P src/usr.sbin/makefs/makefs.c P src/usr.sbin/makefs/makefs.h P src/usr.sbin/makefs/walk.c P src/usr.sbin/sdpd/db.c Updating xsrc tree: Killing core files: Running the SUP scanner: SUP Scan for current starting at Wed Nov 25 03:27:02 2015 SUP Scan for current completed at Wed Nov 25 03:41:09 2015 SUP Scan for mirror starting at Wed Nov 25 03:41:09 2015 SUP Scan for mirror completed at Wed Nov 25 04:18:39 2015 Updating release-6 src tree (netbsd-6): Updating release-6 xsrc tree (netbsd-6): Running the SUP scanner: SUP Scan for release-6 starting at Wed Nov 25 04:31:26 2015 SUP Scan for release-6 completed at Wed Nov 25 04:31:38 2015 Updating release-7 src tree (netbsd-7): U doc/CHANGES-7.1 P include/limits.h P lib/libc/stdlib/jemalloc.c P lib/libpthread/pthread.c P lib/libpthread/pthread_int.h P lib/libpthread/pthread_key_create.3 P lib/libpthread/pthread_tsd.c P lib/libpthread_dbg/pthread_dbg.c Updating release-7 xsrc tree (netbsd-7): Running the SUP scanner: SUP Scan for release-7 starting at Wed Nov 25 04:44:50 2015 SUP Scan for release-7 completed at Wed Nov 25 04:44:58 2015 Updating file list: -rw-rw-r-- 1 srcmastr netbsd 56058792 Nov 25 05:04 ls-lRA.gz
Re: Bad sleep time resolution of nanosleep(2)
On Tue 24 Nov 2015 at 06:54:09 +, Michael van Elst wrote: > N.B. nanosleep shouldn't be based on ticks. I agree. I found that I get much better precision if I simply subtract 1/HZ seconds from the time I want to sleep, since that always gets added in practice. But user programs should not need to do that (not need to find out the value of HZ). -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- The Doctor: No, 'eureka' is Greek for \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl-- 'this bath is too hot.' signature.asc Description: PGP signature
