Re: item element with xmlns=""

2008-01-24 Thread jason . laskowski
I am having the same issue trying to return a Collection .
I am using apache-cxf-2.0.4-incubator-SNAPSHOT with Aegis bindings.

http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>http://beans.partner.aurora.org";>

Client throws this error:
Caused by: com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxParsingException: Non-default namespace 
can not map to empty URI (as per Namespace 1.0 # 2) in XML 1.0 documents
at [row,col {unknown-source}]: [1,187]
at 
com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.constructWfcException(StreamScanner.java:605)
at 
com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.throwParseError(StreamScanner.java:461)
at 
com.ctc.wstx.sr.BasicStreamReader.handleNsAttrs(BasicStreamReader.java:3052)
at 
com.ctc.wstx.sr.BasicStreamReader.handleStartElem(BasicStreamReader.java:2934)
at 
com.ctc.wstx.sr.BasicStreamReader.nextFromTree(BasicStreamReader.java:2846)
at 
com.ctc.wstx.sr.BasicStreamReader.next(BasicStreamReader.java:1019)
at 
org.apache.cxf.staxutils.DepthXMLStreamReader.next(DepthXMLStreamReader.java:215)
at 
org.apache.cxf.staxutils.StaxUtils.nextEvent(StaxUtils.java:132)
... 15 more

I am thinking the issues is the fact that the namespace is mssing in 






Marco Piraccini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
01/24/2008 10:06 AM
Please respond to
cxf-user@incubator.apache.org


To
cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
cc

Subject
Re: item element with xmlns=""






Thank you Dan for your quick answer.
I already tried with CXF-2.0.4 (RC) but the behaviour seems to be the 
same as the 2.0.3
version.

Marco.


Quoting Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>
> Any chance you could check with the 2.0.4 release candidates available
> at:
> http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator/
>
> There were definite issues with Exceptions not working correctly with
> qualified schemas in 2.0.3.   They should (hopefully) be fixed there.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Thursday 24 January 2008, Marco Piraccini wrote:
>> I need to expose a service (java-first) with CXF with an exception
>> (EchoComplexException
>> ) that includes an array of object (of class EchoStruct).
>> The service is setted with: anonymousWrapperType, qualifyWrapperSchema
>> ad wrapped to true.
>>
>> The wsdl generated seems to be correct, with a wrapper
>> EchoComplexException of the type:
>>
>> 
>> 
>> > nillable="true" type="tns:echoStruct"/>
>> 
>> 
>>
>> The problem is that, on object deserialization, the
>> EchoComplexException is serialized in:
>>
>> 
>> > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
>> 
>> true
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> ...that's correct, except for the xmlns="" item namespace. Of course
>> the schema validation fails.
>>
>> Anyone meet the same problem?
>>
>> Marco.
>
>
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer, IONA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>






Re: item element with xmlns=""

2008-01-24 Thread Daniel Kulp

Any chance you could send me a testcase?  (You can send a zip/tgz 
directly to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED])

One more thing to try:   (this will only really work for 2.0.4)
In the package containing the EchoStruct class, add a package-info.java 
that contains something like:

@javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlSchema(
namespace = "yyy", 
elementFormDefault=javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlNsForm.QUALIFIED)
package yyy;


Dan


On Thursday 24 January 2008, Marco Piraccini wrote:
> Thank you Dan for your quick answer.
> I already tried with CXF-2.0.4 (RC) but the behaviour seems to be the
> same as the 2.0.3
> version.
>
> Marco.
>
> Quoting Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Any chance you could check with the 2.0.4 release candidates
> > available at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator/
> >
> > There were definite issues with Exceptions not working correctly
> > with qualified schemas in 2.0.3.   They should (hopefully) be fixed
> > there.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Thursday 24 January 2008, Marco Piraccini wrote:
> >> I need to expose a service (java-first) with CXF with an exception
> >> (EchoComplexException
> >> ) that includes an array of object (of class EchoStruct).
> >> The service is setted with: anonymousWrapperType,
> >> qualifyWrapperSchema ad wrapped to true.
> >>
> >> The wsdl generated seems to be correct, with a wrapper
> >> EchoComplexException of the type:
> >>
> >> 
> >> 
> >>  >> nillable="true" type="tns:echoStruct"/>
> >> 
> >> 
> >>
> >> The problem is that, on object deserialization, the
> >> EchoComplexException is serialized in:
> >>
> >> 
> >>  >> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
> >> 
> >> true
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>
> >> ...that's correct, except for the xmlns="" item namespace. Of
> >> course the schema validation fails.
> >>
> >> Anyone meet the same problem?
> >>
> >> Marco.
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer, IONA
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog


Re: item element with xmlns=""

2008-01-24 Thread Marco Piraccini

Thank you Dan for your quick answer.
I already tried with CXF-2.0.4 (RC) but the behaviour seems to be the  
same as the 2.0.3

version.

Marco.


Quoting Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:



Any chance you could check with the 2.0.4 release candidates available
at:
http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator/

There were definite issues with Exceptions not working correctly with
qualified schemas in 2.0.3.   They should (hopefully) be fixed there.

Dan


On Thursday 24 January 2008, Marco Piraccini wrote:

I need to expose a service (java-first) with CXF with an exception
(EchoComplexException
) that includes an array of object (of class EchoStruct).
The service is setted with: anonymousWrapperType, qualifyWrapperSchema
ad wrapped to true.

The wsdl generated seems to be correct, with a wrapper
EchoComplexException of the type:







The problem is that, on object deserialization, the
EchoComplexException is serialized in:


http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>

true




...that's correct, except for the xmlns="" item namespace. Of course
the schema validation fails.

Anyone meet the same problem?

Marco.




--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog







Re: item element with xmlns=""

2008-01-24 Thread Daniel Kulp

Any chance you could check with the 2.0.4 release candidates available 
at:
http://people.apache.org/~dkulp/stage_cxf/2.0.4-incubator/

There were definite issues with Exceptions not working correctly with 
qualified schemas in 2.0.3.   They should (hopefully) be fixed there.

Dan


On Thursday 24 January 2008, Marco Piraccini wrote:
> I need to expose a service (java-first) with CXF with an exception
> (EchoComplexException
> ) that includes an array of object (of class EchoStruct).
> The service is setted with: anonymousWrapperType, qualifyWrapperSchema
> ad wrapped to true.
>
> The wsdl generated seems to be correct, with a wrapper
> EchoComplexException of the type:
>
> 
> 
>  nillable="true" type="tns:echoStruct"/>
> 
> 
>
> The problem is that, on object deserialization, the
> EchoComplexException is serialized in:
>
> 
>  xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
> 
> true
> 
> 
> 
>
> ...that's correct, except for the xmlns="" item namespace. Of course
> the schema validation fails.
>
> Anyone meet the same problem?
>
> Marco.



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog


item element with xmlns=""

2008-01-24 Thread Marco Piraccini
I need to expose a service (java-first) with CXF with an exception  
(EchoComplexException

) that includes an array of object (of class EchoStruct).
The service is setted with: anonymousWrapperType, qualifyWrapperSchema  
ad wrapped to true.


The wsdl generated seems to be correct, with a wrapper  
EchoComplexException of the type:




nillable="true" type="tns:echoStruct"/>




The problem is that, on object deserialization, the  
EchoComplexException is serialized in:



xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>


true




...that's correct, except for the xmlns="" item namespace. Of course  
the schema validation fails.


Anyone meet the same problem?

Marco.