Re: Cygwin visual brand

2010-05-18 Thread Brent Kerr
 To reiterate, I am not interested in collaborating with anyone on web
 site redesign and, as I said, I don't think a mascot is called for.

Well that's that, case closed :) Thanks for taking the time to
respond, Christopher. And while I'm at it, thank you and the other
contributors for all the effort you've invested in Cygwin.

If circumstances change in the future where you welcome outside
assistance, be that for a total website overhaul, minor touch-ups or
on-going maintenance/webmastering, please feel free to get in touch
[1].

I'll leave my proposal [2] online for the time being. I'm still open
to requests from other projects that would like assistance with their
website [3].

Cheers,
Brent

[1] via email or I can be found on Freenode as HappyPelican
[2] http://cygwin.codecamel.com
[3] for details regarding 'why' - http://codecamel.com/donate

--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



Re: Cygwin visual brand

2010-05-13 Thread Brent Kerr
Mike, thank you for your comments.

 I haven't looked at this but what is a style changer tool ( would it
 be obvious if I looked? Just change style sheets or something).

Yes, it would be obvious if you looked. It simply has a drop down box
that lets you choose the header color, font type or page width (please
look before making assumptions). I could have provided a list of links
with each slight variation or I could have quickly coded this tool to
let the user play with the combinations - I think this makes it easier
and it only took me a few minutes.

 My point here is not to ask random
 questions about tangential topics but this highlights
 an important area of command line tools for graphical
 desgin needs. Could you build all the artwork and generate all the html
 from command line scripts and give these scripts various parameters
 so that variations could beconsistently generated using general rules?

I don't see why not, but then I also don't see the point of that.
There are very few images used in my sample, and those that are used
are only there for aesthetics - they convey nothing important. Even
the title is text driven, unlike the current site.

 One objective beyond making cool pictures may be to see how well you can 
 automate
 and design without a GUI program.

I'm confused here. Design what exactly? My proposed website was coded
entirely using a text editor. No serious web developer uses GUI
programs.

 This isn't just academic or banter or whining about saving a few bytes
 when everyone knows the speed of light is increasing each day,
 but lets say you wanted to generate web pages for wireless, unusual
 locales,  or other
 devics that have some fixed relation to your main pages and don't want
 to redesign them etc.

No images were used to convey information. The website can be
translated into other languages very easily while retaining the look
and feel. As with all websites I build, presentation is separate from
content. This means we can simply apply a different style sheet to
change the way the site renders (if we chose to), but that wouldn't be
necessary for this Website. It is such a simple site that it can be
viewed on any device you like as it is - feel free to try it out in
lynx via Cygwin. As an example of the site's versatility, you will
enjoy a convenient skip to content link that magically doesn't
appear on the site when viewed in a graphical web browser such as
Firefox. I have no doubt improvements could be made to the text-only
version, and I'd be more than happy to make those.

 Using cygwin to design and generate the site would be a good result in itself 
 :)

As I said, only a text editor has been used to build the site.

Cheers,
Brent

--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



Re: Cygwin visual brand

2010-05-12 Thread Brent Kerr
 Could Christopher and/or Corinna please weigh in on this?  There seem to be
 a lot of ideas and energy behind this project, but I don't think the
 discussion can go much further until we hear from them.

 Is either of you interested in having a redesign of cygwin.com?  What would
 be your criteria for an acceptable redesign?

I agree, it's important to hear from the decision makers on all this,
and not just regarding website design, but also requirements/concerns
relating to ease of implementation, updating and so on - this all
affects the proposal.

Meanwhile, I read back through the mailing list and spotted a comment
by Corinna asking for a little more green [1], so I've added a
style-changer tool (for color and font) to my proposal at
http://cygwin.codecamel.com. It's not a permanent feature, just a
dinky tool to compare themes. Feel free to suggest colors/fonts.

Cheers,
Brent

[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/114495

--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



Re: Cygwin visual brand

2010-05-11 Thread Brent Kerr
Hi,

Klaus, thanks for your feedback on my sample site
(http://cygwin.codecamel.com). Further information about why/what/how
can be found in my message on the original thread
(http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2010-03/msg00744.html), so I won't go
into it again on this one.

 A few months ago somebody on this list offered an appealing redesign
 of the Cygwin.com website. [1][2]  That, unfortunately, seems to have
 gone nowhere (unless something is happening behind the scenes).

Nothing is happening behind the scenes (that involves me).

I'm a HTML/CSS standards  accessibility developer so my design
ability is relatively limited, but I'm happy to incorporate any ideas
or work with a graphic designer if I'm asked to. However, I feel that
a site such as cygwin.com doesn't need anything fancy. It should
simply be clear, easy to update and standards compliant.

Also, I  agree the name setup.exe could be improved so perhaps a new
thread should be made for that.

Cheers,
Brent

--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



Re: cygwin.com website

2010-03-21 Thread Brent Kerr
Thank you for your feedback. Firstly, I'd just like to say that my
proposal was inspired almost entirely by the current site. I'm happy
to adapt any ideas/comments/feedback or even consider a different
approach.

 There was another proposal and discussion about redesign in December and the 
 idea to spend effort on this wasn't too well-received... :-\

Apart from feedback, the effort required would be almost entirely
donated by me. This includes development, installation of content and
packaging so it can be quickly uploaded and installed.  I will also be
available to provide maintenance and updates post-launch if necessary.

 Yet I dare to add my comments:

   * I would refrain from using dull MS default fonts, please! The
     MingW site referred to doesn't use the omnipresent non-font, either.

I can't imagine Arial not being considered omnipresent, but if you
prefer system default fonts, that would simply be a matter of editing
a single line in the CSS file (which I have done on the demo site to
show you how it will look - reminder: clear cache).

The logo is simply text generated by the browser (ie: no images have
been used). I tried to match the graphic on the current site.

   * I would rather not include obscure JavaScript snipplets pointing
     to google-analytics or doing some other page tracking.

This has only been added for my own tracking purposes and wouldn't be
included in the production site.

   * To keep maintenance easy, layout should be strictly separated from
     existing contents (as I tried to demonstrate myself in the
     December dicsussion). This seems to be the case with the current
     proposal.

Yes, the layout (form) has been separated from the content.

Other features you may or may not have noticed:
* An HTML5 doctype
* Almost no graphics, fast loading
* Modular - PHP includes used for easy editing.
Header/Navigation/Right Column/Footer all in separate files. (PHP
doesn't have to be used of course, it was just a personal preference)
* An (optional) .htaccess file included to remove the extension
(.php) from the URIs, eg: cygwin.com/community instead of
cygwin.com/community.php
* Some CSS3 properties have been used to generate rounded corners and
text shadow effects in the header (Firefox/Safari/Chrome browsers
only)
* All sizing in ems - The layout will be maintained if the user
changes the font size.

The MinGW-W64 website also displays a live feed from the SourceForge
project page. This can be included if you like.

Looking forward to further feedback.

Cheers,
Brent

--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple



cygwin.com website

2010-03-19 Thread Brent Kerr
Hey,

I've whipped up a web template for cygwin.com if you'd like to use it
- http://cygwin.codecamel.com/ - (it's what I do). Only the homepage
and community page are up there at the moment, but let me know if you
want the rest and I'll put it together.

Cheers,
Brent

--
Problem reports:   http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:  http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple