Re: jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 02:03:43 + "\\0xDynamite" wrote: > >> You retard. > >> I connected the etymology of 'state' and 'State'. > >> Then connected Jim's AP to a 'State' (Government). > >> Jim is a Statist. > >> What don't you get ? > > > > a government or 'the state' is a group of criminals claiming > > 'sovereignity' over a geographical area and the people in > > it. "The state" is by definition a group thieves and murderers who > > violate personal rights. > > What about if it's a People's government? people's gpvernment? That's just a meaningless slogan. > > \0xd
OpenZFS Dev Summit 2017
http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/OpenZFS_Developer_Summit https://livestream.com/accounts/26168990/OpenZFS2017 Darknet distributed bulk data Lords... "ZFS: Our local backing fs of choice." Crypto bits (add on top of FDE)... http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/ZFS-Native_Encryption https://youtu.be/frnLiXclAMo https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5hUzsxe4cdmU3ZTRXNxa2JIaDQ/view?usp=sharing
Re: Graph theory question
On 10/28/2017 5:01 AM, George Violaris wrote: how would good peers with only two connections be able to gain reputation in such a system? Nobody gains reputation. It is intended that identities are valuable, and people don't want them blacklisted. Byzantine failure loses reputation. To get into the system, you have to be accepted by three others, which is intended to cost time, thought, effort and money, so that once you are in, you don't want to get negative reputation. Observe how Ebay works. One negative review is really bad. No number of positive reviews is particularly valuable. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: [MINISTRY] the “Holocaustification of politics”
All human blood can be traced to Africa. That is a myth. It is not a myth, lol. What you think it means is a myth. Modern humans and modern chimps are both descended from a group of chimp like creatures that lived in Africa. That does not make chimps human, nor does it necessarily make black Africans human. That black Africans are human is a fact about scientific nomenclature, not a fact about biology. They are human because Charles Darwin did not feel like drawing a line down the middle of the Sahara. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: [MINISTRY] the “Holocaustification of politics”
On Oct 27, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Jose wrote: >> John Newman jnn at synfin.org >> Thu Oct 26 10:29:54 PDT 2017 >> > >> All human blood can be traced to Africa. >> > > That is a myth. > It is not a myth, lol. Cutting and pasting some shit you don't understand, thinking you've scored a solid intellectual point... you're a very sad moron. Modern humans evolved in africa a few hundred thousand years ago. All humans share a single mitochondrial eve. You have "nigger blood", you dumb fucking eggplant ;)
Re: jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 20:55:00 + Volunteer wrote: > > juan juan.g71 at gmail.com > > Fri Oct 27 13:15:13 PDT 2017 > > > > > equivocal > > ambiguous fallacy caused by double meaning of a word > > > > You retard. > I connected the etymology of 'state' and 'State'. > Then connected Jim's AP to a 'State' (Government). > Jim is a Statist. > What don't you get ? a government or 'the state' is a group of criminals claiming 'sovereignity' over a geographical area and the people in it. "The state" is by definition a group thieves and murderers who violate personal rights. "assasination politics' as far as I'm concerned simply means killing government employees in self-defense. How is such a form of legitimate self-defense a state/government? If a cop attacks me and I can kill it, I will. Excercising my right to self-defense does not make me an statist. Same right to self defense belongs to anybody else who is not a member of the state.
Re: jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Marina Brown wrote: > > These little dick white boys get so insecure about their failure to be > able to get a girlfriend that they feel compelled to accuse anyone who > rejects them of being a man. My dear Marina, Mark is a very smart guy and discovered the real truth about me: https://imgur.com/a/JnCFv Hahahahahaha!!! ;D
jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
> juan juan.g71 at gmail.com > Fri Oct 27 13:15:13 PDT 2017 > > equivocal > ambiguous fallacy caused by double meaning of a word > You retard. I connected the etymology of 'state' and 'State'. Then connected Jim's AP to a 'State' (Government). Jim is a Statist. What don't you get ?
Re: jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 20:23:00 + Volunteer wrote: > You cannot ignore the agreed meaning of words you use without offering > alternative meanings. "state" means GOVERNMENT So, again, stop equivocating. Everything you saod is just dishonest stupid equivocation. Worthless.
jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
> jim bell jdb10987 at yahoo.com > Fri Oct 27 11:00:11 PDT 2017 > > I didn't purport to "tax" anyone. > I ask for donations. > You "cheekily" suggested a finder fee for increasing the "value" of "coin" properties. Finder "fees" are a "tax". > distinguish between "tax" and a "donation" > Both are the redistribution of "wealth", e.g., the same. Only the context changes. Mandatory and optional "taxes" or "exchanges of value for service" are the same kind of payment within a different context. You can disguise coerced payments as "donations" all you want, it doesn't change the truth. The open-source/libre communities have been doing this for decades. And the church, even longer. > achieve freedom > by means of AP (murda) > This is very violent. Cypherpunks is a board of peace. You should fork your work to my 'Archive Politics', project. > "the expression of certain freedoms" > Be more specific. > I think you said it breddu gud: Freedom is free. Getting to a condition of freedom, however, is not the same thing as being free. We have to do things to become free."" -Jim Bell > Explain what you call > "[my] double standard with "taxes"" > I did above. Finders "fee" for crypto. I do not object to your pursuit of wealth, via direct donation, to pay for your time in developing a new system of political governance. > you split up these comments in a confusing fashion > I snip out the bulk and keep what is heard. Your actual quote is archived in the previous thread post, I am only referencing. > It's hard to respond when you do that. > Don't you use HTML email ? It is difficult to read when you do that. Your words are often not separated from the content you quote. But this is an unmoderated list =) > deliberately misrepresenting me > you distort what I actually wrote > Nope. Just posting what I hear, to establish a reference for my words. What you write, "in my own words", for aiding accuracy. It enables (you) to make edits to initial statements or "signals" as received by (me). "Just one murder away from utopia" is a Gommunist critique and parallels my observation of your AP system. > definitional drivel deleted > you are falsely representing the definition of "State" > Lol. You cannot ignore the agreed meaning of words you use without offering alternative meanings. Unless you define 'state'/'State' different than 'state' (state of something) or 'State' (Antarctic State), you are subject to the logic of my argument which asserts that a "State" is an individual and/or collective status of beliefes and agreements protected only by the individual and/or collective ability to defend the status of these beliefs and agreements. > I don't recall ever having "agreed" to > Voided oaths do not apply. > ded guyz made the decision for me > usual excuse > Not an excuse because it is not true. Americans must reaffirm their "constitution" every generation. > that criticism is quite backwards > AP donations are going to be made by individuals > "The interests of the group" are irrelevant > "The Group" in this context is the greater commongood, as you seem to assert that "bad politicians" will be targets of this system and "benefit" the greater populace. > "THE group", as if there is only one > "The Group" in this context is those who participate in the AP system as you propose, mostly those with the greatest resources. In both examples, "The Group" becomes a tyranny of the few, and Marina's observations follow. > "AP, is a "State" (political definition)" > Your opinion. > Govern: to regulate or direct. AP is a system of government. Do you dispute this ? > likening libertarianism to communism > nonsense > Lol. Democracy: People should have a say. Totalitarianism: Do as I/We say at threat of death. Libertarianism (Socialism/Communism): People should have a say, at threat of death. It is the mere perception of freedom, as exemplified in Plato's Republic when discussing the "just" lie. The "freedom" of an individual to pay into an AP system is removed by the "freedom" of another to "kill" them for doing so, enslaving all participants, and (since proofs are difficult if not impossible to recover given you suggest public cryptography) all suspects, to group controlled behaviors.
Re: jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:11:00 + Volunteer wrote: > By denying the "State" (political definition), what the fuck are you talking about - oh yes, http://www.dictionary.com/browse/equivocation?s=t and now you need to learn that "state" is a "synonym" for "government" and "government" means "the biggest mafia in a given area" https://www.thefreedictionary.com/state 4. a. The supreme public power within a sovereign political entity: b. The sphere of supreme civil power within a given polity: c. A specific kind of government 6. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) a sovereign political power or community. (OK - that one is a shitty ambiguous def. and the one you dishonestly misuse) 8. (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) the sphere of power in such a community: affairs of state. etc, as you see, "state" means "the motherfuckers who have POWER over some area/group of human cattle". And THAT is what libertarians mean by state. "State" just means plain fucking GOVERNMENT. "the state did X Y Z" means "a group of criminal non-human turs who call themselves 'the government' did X Y Z". Got it? And finally retards like you who think that the GOVERNMNT or STATE is legitiamte aer called STATISTS. If on the other hand you understnad that government is just a criminal organization that must be exterminated, then you are an ANARCHIST. > you seem to be > objecting to groups and group activities, such as agreeing to work > together, in a shared "state" (all definitions). OK - now prove that you are not a complete dishonest retard and stop equivocating.
Re: jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
On 10/26/2017 09:48 PM, Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, juan wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 23:56:51 + >> "\\0xDynamite" wrote: >> > From whence comes life? > > * other life TAKEN > * accumulated life force given in the act of REPRODUCTION > * new life force made (and held) in the act of love without > reproduction, an act of FUSION, I'll argue, > * GOD what the fuck do you mean ' god ' ? + 1. God?! (Ô.o) >>> >>> Cecilia, I know you're a man posing as a woman, transgender or >>> whatnot, but don't get into the argment of GOD vs goddess because GOD >>> is a gender-neutral, unisex term in the totality of what god IS, hence >>> it is genus HOMO and arose PRIOR to ANY NOTION OF gender. >>> >> >> again - what is this 'god' thing you keep talking about ? >> >> >> >>> You may be seated. >>> >>> Marxos > > > Mark, I love filters and you were blocked a few days ago, so I am > reading your bizarre commentaries and answers only because of Juan's > courtesy. Should I thank you for this garbage, my dear Juan? > Hahaha!! ;D > > I was *not* questioning God's gender or something similar, just asking > what the heck God has to do with anarchism and politics? I don't know > if God really exists, guy. Why would I waste my time discussing God's > gender on a CyperPunk list? Are you crazy? :P > > And I don't have any reason to talk about my gender either. I am a > cis woman and won't send pics of my pussy and breasts to prove you are > wrong. But if you feel happy thinking I am a man, please do it. Just > remember that I am much more "macho" than you and my penis is bigger > than the one of this guy here, but I am discreet and don't show it on > the TV, hahahaha!!! ;D > These little dick white boys get so insecure about their failure to be able to get a girlfriend that they feel compelled to accuse anyone who rejects them of being a man. What they don't realize is that most men reject them too. Glad for my filters too ! > # > http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/756719/World-s-biggest-penis-half-metre-Roberto-Cabrera-disabled-pillow > > Ok, explain what God has to do with politics? God hates all the > people and shows it giving us corrupt and vile governments? What is > your point? Is there a real point?! :-/ >
theocracy was Re: jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
On Thu, 26 Oct 2017 23:48:02 -0200 Cecilia Tanaka wrote: > > Mark, I love filters and you were blocked a few days ago, so I am > reading your bizarre commentaries and answers only because of Juan's > courtesy. Should I thank you for this garbage, my dear Juan? > Hahaha!! ;D > > I was *not* questioning God's gender or something similar, just asking > what the heck God has to do with anarchism and politics? Well, that's a good question =) For starters, theocracy is the oldest form of government so 'god' is the oldest 'official' scammer, extortionist, thief and murderer in history. That's especially true regarding the god of the fucking joo-kristians. > I don't know > if God really exists, guy. Why would I waste my time discussing God's > gender on a CyperPunk list? Are you crazy? :P > > And I don't have any reason to talk about my gender either. I am a > cis woman and won't send pics of my pussy and breasts to prove you are > wrong. But if you feel happy thinking I am a man, please do it. Just > remember that I am much more "macho" than you and my penis is bigger > than the one of this guy here, but I am discreet and don't show it on > the TV, hahahaha!!! ;D > > # > http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/756719/World-s-biggest-penis-half-metre-Roberto-Cabrera-disabled-pillow > > Ok, explain what God has to do with politics? God hates all the > people and shows it giving us corrupt and vile governments? pretty much - anarchism on one hand and church and state on the other are conceptually related because 'god' and government are the worst enemies of freedom. So 'god' is arguably on-topic here because if you want to fight against an enenmy, you better know it well. > What is > your point? Is there a real point?! :-/
Re: Graph theory question
On 10/27/2017 5:43 AM, James A. Donald wrote: Purported peers that have only one connection are clients of the entity to which they are connected, and he is responsible for their good behavior, similarly those that have only two connections. Three good peer connections make you a peer of all the other peers, two good connections do not make you a peer - don't get equal treatment to the vertices by which you are connected, get graylist treatment. What if you only have two good connections but each of your two connections have 3+ connections - how would good peers with only two connections be able to gain reputation in such a system? i.e. if the connections can be laterally traversed in order to reach any connected node, how would the other nodes be able to know if a peer is honest or if it has been spoofed? I believe this is actually how the recent ransomware spread in networks. They use systems that trust other systems. In order to prevent such attacks, the networking protocols need to be amended. An additional negotiation sublayer can be created which asks the other peer a question only they can know the answer to. This can be something such as encrypting all connections at the tcp/ip level, or applying something like proof of work to make it uneconomical for sybils (but this actually only solves the issue in a probabilistic way). ./gv
Re: [MINISTRY] the “Holocaustification of politics”
> John Newman jnn at synfin.org > Thu Oct 26 10:29:54 PDT 2017 > > All human blood can be traced to Africa. > That is a myth. Re-examining the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy. Seven thousand five hundred fifty-six (7556) haplotypes of fourty-six (46) subclades in seventeen (17) major haplogroups were considered, and the finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from African haplogroups A or B is suported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups, do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B). [1] [1] Klyosov, A. & Rozhanskii, I. (2012). Re-examining the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy. Advances in Anthropology, 2, 80-86. > we wuz kangz > "We" were. Ancient Egyptian Pharaohs were mostly Greek, Persian, & Assyrian, i.e., Caucasian. ~200yrs were Kushite & other Sub-saharan African Pharaohs. > I'm not a racist > If you think "Whitey" stole 'Rock and Roll' music from "Blacks", you very well are. It is a combination of Celtic and African Folk music, cultures who were slaves together. > snip crap > The possible origin of your name is crap ? Have some fucking pride in yourself and your ancestral heritage.
Re: Rick Falkvinge: Media Militarization Through 600 Years
https://falkvinge.net/
Re: jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
From: Volunteer >> jim bell jdb10987 at yahoo.com >> Thu Oct 26 09:11:53 PDT 2017 > >> You have a very vague objection. >I point out contradiction in your "tax" system. No, I didn't purport to "tax" anyone. I ask for donations. If you are incapable of distinguishing between a "tax" and a "donation", that doesn't surprise me at all. Statistics are similarly incapable. Then give metaphor. Do you want a fucking powerpoint? > Freedom is not free. > >Yes it is. >Freedom is a "state" that costs nothing. >It requires no input. Getting to a condition of freedom, however, is not the same thing as being free. I tend to agree that once we actually achieve freedom, by means of AP, maintaining that state will be rather economical. Maybe you will agree that we aren't free today. If you agree, then you should acknowledge that we have to do things to become free. Those things may cost, even if the cost is low once we get there, to freedom. >You are thinking of the expression of certain freedoms. Be more specific. >> you are wrong >> because "capitalism" > >I am correct to assert that your double standard with "taxes" is unacceptable. Your pursuit of "wealth" is okay. Explain what you call "[my] double standard with "taxes"" . Asking for donations to help achieve a state of freedom isn't the same thing as taxation. Also, you split up these comments in a confusing fashion. It's hard to respond when you do that. > AP > virtually nobody has argued it won't work. > properly implemented > just one murder away from utopia The material above did not all come from me. Thus, it appears that you are deliberately misrepresenting what I said. The last line, I didn't write. Why do you distort what I actually wrote? You need to be more careful with your quoting. >We've never tried 'REAL' Gommunism, anyway. That's the current story put out by Communists and Communist sympathizers, at least. They have to explain away 100 years of history. Although, I don't think it would matter, even if it were true as claimed. The goal is to solve problems of society. If a few dozen nations each claimed to adopt Communism, , and yet they all failed and NONE of them were said to be ACTUALLY "Communist" (by today's apologistic definition), that would be a valid indictment of the very concept of Communism, wouldn't it? After all, the issue isn't whether "Communism" can be implemented in some sort of rarified theory, but whether Communism could actually be implemented readily and work, more or less, like its 19th century promoters claimed would work. > the actual problem is that you are a Statist > u blakk, y u axin lyk u whyt ? > y dis whyt boi axin lyk he blakk ? > >I think the problem is with your definition of "State". >[Begin Quote] >STATE [much definitional drivel deleted] [End Quote] >By denying the "State" (political definition), you seem to be objecting to groups and group activities, such as agreeing to work together, in a shared "state" (all definitions). It looks like you are falsely representing that "the state" amounts to "agreeing to work together in a shared "state"".I don't believe that there is usually an "agreement" between all people affected by a "state". I don't recall ever having "agreed" to the existence of the Federal Government of the United States, to name just one example. The usual excuse is that some other people (many or most of whom are dead) made the decision for me, at least as early as 1789, when the U.S. Constitution was written. Whether or not that argument "works" is up for debate. >Yet /asspol/ implements a group activity to "kill" individuals who do not act in accordance with the interests of the group, for profit. Actually, that criticism is quite backwards. AP donations are going to be made by individuals. "The interests of the group" are irrelevant in that context. Also, you are using the phrase, "of THE group", as if there is only one articulable group. "Your fifth column option, AP, is a "State" (political definition) in the very worst sense." Your opinion. > I see now that 'Libertarian' is not the objection to both democratic and totalitarian systems but is the combination of the two; the perception of freedom; Marxist Gommunism at its finest. You are yet another delusional person. I will let others unpack that nonsense. Jim Bell
Rick Falkvinge: Media Militarization Through 600 Years
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-nR23IkTXc https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=falkvinge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihAEuQ4KXqo
jimbellproject.org is looking for volunteers
> jim bell jdb10987 at yahoo.com > Thu Oct 26 09:11:53 PDT 2017 > > You have a very vague objection. > Wut. I point out contradiction in your "tax" system. Then give metaphor. Do you want a fucking powerpoint? > Freedom is not free. > Yes it is. Freedom is a "state" that costs nothing. It requires no input. You are thinking of the expression of certain freedoms. > you are wrong > because "capitalism" > I am correct to assert that your double standard with "taxes" is unacceptable. Your pursuit of "wealth" is okay. > AP > virtually nobody has argued it won't work. > properly implemented > just one murder away from utopia > We've never tried 'REAL' Gommunism, anyway. Lol. > the actual problem is that you are a Statist > u blakk, y u axin lyk u whyt ? > y dis whyt boi axin lyk he blakk ? > I think the problem is with your definition of "State". [Begin Quote] STATE Origin: 1175-1225; Middle English 'stat' (noun); Aphetic variant of 'estat' (estate); Latin 'status' (condition) see status; Latin 'status' (rērum), state (of things); Latin 'status' (reī pūblicae), state (of the republic); Old French 'estat', from Latin 'status' (a standing), from 'stāre' (to stand). History: early 13c., "circumstances, temporary attributes of a person or thing, conditions", from Latin 'status' "manner of standing, position, condition". late 13c., the Latin word was adopted into other modern Germanic languages (e.g. German, Dutch 'staat') but in the political senses only. Meaning "physical condition as regards to form or structure". 1590s, "to set in a position," from state (n.1); the sense of "declare in words" is first attested 1640s, from the notion of "placing" something on the record. [End Quote] By denying the "State" (political definition), you seem to be objecting to groups and group activities, such as agreeing to work together, in a shared "state" (all definitions). Yet /asspol/ implements a group activity to "kill" individuals who do not act in accordance with the interests of the group, for profit. Your fifth column option, AP, is a "State" (political definition) in the very worst sense. I see now that 'Libertarian' is not the objection to both democratic and totalitarian systems but is the combination of the two; the perception of freedom; Marxist Gommunism at its finest. >>>/protocols/
[HISTORY] - How to stage a revolution, + historical comparison between old and new (color, and recently failed) revolutions in Russia - astounding parallels
This is quite some interesting history, pointers on how to instigate a [color] revolution (although this amateur attempt evidently failed), and the "painting" of such planned events both before and after the (planned) public event. Quite stunning historical and contemporary comparison, and worthy material for a movie script to boot... and I suggest this as the Movie name: Soros' Last Gasp :D Note though that this particular piece with its various bits of translated Russian, is a little rough around the edges, so a little bit more mental work required. The piece de resistance in this rivetting saga is that the guts of the exposure of this literal Shoah Psy-op, was citizens investigators, in this case, cyphery punkery types in Russia. Go the Russkie cypherpunks! Just like CNN and their JQ promotion, this is real, actual, happening live events! Absolutely amazing time to be alive. Enjoy, ** Bloody Monday: Grandnephew of GULAG organizer stabbed Moscow radio station editor http://russiafeed.com/bloody-monday-grandnephew-of-gulag-organizer-stabbed-moscow-radio-station-editor/
Re: [MINISTRY] the “Holocaustification of politics”
On 10/27/2017 3:29 AM, John Newman wrote: All human blood can be traced to Africa. Seventy thousand years of evolution since Africa. The white race is only ten thousand years old, the East Asian race not much older. The original settlers from Africa were very different from us and from today's black Africans. Seventy thousand years is a long time. The white race originated from a mingling of brownish brown eyed farmers from what is now the middle east, and blue eyed hunted gatherers of unknown skin color and hair color, probably red haired and yellowish brown skinned, a combination that never occurs in moderns, in Eastern Europe or Siberia, originating from what is now Europe. Neither of these races corresponded all that much to any present day race. The blue eyed Siberian people were descended from the same race that did the cave paintings in Europe. The hunter gatherers retreated from the farmers, then, in Eastern Europe or Siberia, mingled with them and took up cattle herding with cattle dogs. The cattle herders then re-entered Europe in repeated waves of genocidal conquest, pretty much eradicating the farmer people that originally farmed Europe. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
