Re: USA 2020 Elections: Thread
Biden Crime Family and Democrat Commies get DESTROYED... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiiSq7toqlQ Tony Bobulinski #SinoHawk Phone Logs https://mobile.twitter.com/hashtag/sinohawk https://mobile.twitter.com/MikeEmanuelFox https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jim-hunter-biden-china-joint-venture-key-contacts https://nypost.com/2020/10/22/hunter-biz-partner-confirms-e-mail-details-joe-bidens-push-to-make-millions-from-china/ After far more than week of Mass Censorship by Trad and Social Media, and corrupt Joe Biden and Democrats utterly refusing come clean... Biden's polls are finally dropping like rocks, and the entire US Democratic Socialist Party is now distrusted thanks to their bogus and failed four year long political assault on Trump. Joe Biden is a LIAR and a FRAUD. Ilhan Omar schemes #CashForBallots. Moderators are all corrupt. Etc. Just wait till Clinton Obama bin Laden Benghazi, and more, hits the news. In political corruption rackets, there is never just one ship that goes down... an entire fleet of failure awaits. Trump is outside the establishment. And the US will never be a Socialist country. https://mobile.twitter.com/hashtag/DrainTheSwamp
Re: USA 2020 Elections: Thread
Honest Political Ads... https://mobile.twitter.com/SydneyLWatson/status/1319378868130676738 Weekend at Biden's :)
Re: james donalds 'political philosophy'
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 09:37:48PM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > The concept of 'race' is .. useless for any serious discussion about > politics. Your position that IQ is useless to any serious discussion about politics, is in dispute. > Now, by pretending to discuss 'race' and 'IQ' in 'scientific' terms > you're showing you're just the typical pseudo scientific charlatan who use > 'science' as an excuse to push his totalitarian garbage. Your inability to see important connections between IQ and politics (/socio-political matters) does not make the significance/relevance disappear. > > This is, as Jordan Peterson has pointed out, very significant. > > LMAO. Can't you do better than that? You don't listen to JP, it appears you cannot stand him in fact, so you wouldn't know now, would you?
Re: james donalds 'political philosophy'
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 04:04:35PM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 19:33:18 +1100 > Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > > > > > > skin color is completely irrelevant for morality/politics, just like > > > 'IQ'. > > > > > > Keep arguing an unrelated point I see :) > > > unrelated to what? This 'thread' was about how KKK members like donald > pose as 'libertarian' 'cypherpunks' and how other 'cypherpunks' don't care or > are actually the same as donald. It was not properly responsive to what I'd said/ my point. Yes the thread is started by you and mainly covers what you started talking about, but there was a sub-thread about IQ being related to genetics and IS therefore "race" based. This is, as Jordan Peterson has pointed out, very significant.
Re: worse than rabies: 'theybies' - “But, mommy, I saw Charley do pee pee and he's a boy!” - Mom: "How absolutely DARE you use such language!" - [ENJOY] [PEACE]
> On Oct 21, 2020, at 21:43, Zenaan Harkness vomited into > my mailserver - Zen's biggest source of "news" is a re-launch of a nazi periodical and a Russian government mouthpiece. I always forget that he's just a troll. Even if he believed the asinine shit he posts, if his jokes were actual attempts at humor, etc - it would just be trolling as a side effect of being a worthless shit. I suppose when you want an authentic troll, choose Zen :) In the land of the /somewhat/-sane, I finally setup a new mail filtering scheme so I won't have to glance through this tripe anymore. If I were the type of guy to smoke a gram of trichrome-encrusted cannabis, rolled up in an emptied-out cigarillo, I might just do that. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: worse than rabies: 'theybies' - “But, mommy, I saw Charley do pee pee and he's a boy!” - Mom: "How absolutely DARE you use such language!" - [ENJOY] [PEACE]
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 01:51:03PM -0500, John Newman lovingly cleaned up his vomit like a momma sparrow: > > On Oct 21, 2020, at 21:43, Zenaan Harkness vomited into > > my mailserver - > Zen's biggest source of "news" is a re-launch of a nazi periodical and a > Russian government mouthpiece. > I always forget that he's just a troll. Even if he believed the asinine shit > he posts, if his jokes were actual attempts at humor, etc - it would just be > trolling as a side effect of being a worthless shit. > > I suppose when you want an authentic troll, choose Zen :) Hey hey, high praise ;) That might be the first smiley you've ever spat at me :D Chalk up a feather in the cap today. > In the land of the /somewhat/-sane, I finally setup a new mail filtering > scheme so I won't have to glance through this tripe anymore. If I were the > type of guy to smoke a gram of trichrome-encrusted cannabis, rolled up in an > emptied-out cigarillo, I might just do that. Awwe ... I'll get you a dribble bib.
Re: "That's a colossal ethical failure" - Jordan Peterson returns -- Re: Censorship: Instagram (Facebook) Bans Qanon, Lets ISIS Freepost
On Thursday, October 22, 2020, 03:13:13 AM PDT, Zenaan Harkness wrote: >Worse than that - FB censors call to weigh SCOTUS nominee Amy Coney Barrett >against a duck to prove she's not a witch. I mean, what's the world coming >to when you can't do a quick duck check against a possible witch? >Shocking! >Facebook really should be ashamed of themselves, interfering in a SCOTUS >election in this way - and after a challenge by the BabylonBee, FBook doubled >down on their eleckshun interference. >(Oh, and free speech right to satire - but that's -so- mundane.) : > Netizens Slam Facebook’s ‘Woke Police’ For Banning Babylon Bee Satire on >Grilling of Judge Barrett https://sputniknews.com/us/202010211080834168-netizens-slam-facebooks-woke-police-for-banning-babylon-bee-satire-on-grilling-of-judge-barrett/ > Last Wednesday, the news satire website Babylon Bee ran a story with the headline, "Senator Hirono Demands ACB Be Weighed Against A Duck To See If She Is A Witch," in reference to the grilling Judge Amy Coney Barrett faced from a Hawaii senator, who asked the judge if she had ever "sexually assaulted" anyone. > Facebook has removed an article published by the conservative satirical site The Babylon Bee, mocking the grilling that Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett came under from Hawaii's Democratic Senator Mazie Hirono during last week's confirmation hearing. > Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon slammed the decision by the social media giant, revealing on Twitter the heated debate the satirical piece had triggered. > So after a manual review, Facebook says they stand by their decision to pull down this article and demonetize our page. I'm not kidding. They say this article "incites violence." It's literally a regurgitated joke from a Monty Python movie! — Seth Dillon (@SethDillon) October 20, 2020 https://t.co/U9B6tTOj6N While it may seem obvious to many of us, I think we should explicitly identify "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" as the movie this joke comes from. There aren't as many advantages to being "old" as I'd like, but one key one is that we've heard and seen A LOT. Which is great, as long as we've still got a good memory to go with it. My memory used to be truly astounding, but then Amy Coney Barrett turned me into a newt. But I got better... Jim Bell
"That's a colossal ethical failure" - Jordan Peterson returns -- Re: Censorship: Instagram (Facebook) Bans Qanon, Lets ISIS Freepost
Worse than that - FB censors call to weigh SCOTUS nominee Amy Coney Barrett against a duck to prove she's not a witch. I mean, what's the world coming to when you can't do a quick duck check against a possible witch? Shocking! Facebook really should be ashamed of themselves, interfering in a SCOTUS election in this way - and after a challenge by the BabylonBee, FBook doubled down on their eleckshun interference. (Oh, and free speech right to satire - but that's -so- mundane.) : Netizens Slam Facebook’s ‘Woke Police’ For Banning Babylon Bee Satire on Grilling of Judge Barrett https://sputniknews.com/us/202010211080834168-netizens-slam-facebooks-woke-police-for-banning-babylon-bee-satire-on-grilling-of-judge-barrett/ Last Wednesday, the news satire website Babylon Bee ran a story with the headline, "Senator Hirono Demands ACB Be Weighed Against A Duck To See If She Is A Witch," in reference to the grilling Judge Amy Coney Barrett faced from a Hawaii senator, who asked the judge if she had ever "sexually assaulted" anyone. Facebook has removed an article published by the conservative satirical site The Babylon Bee, mocking the grilling that Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett came under from Hawaii's Democratic Senator Mazie Hirono during last week's confirmation hearing. Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon slammed the decision by the social media giant, revealing on Twitter the heated debate the satirical piece had triggered. So after a manual review, Facebook says they stand by their decision to pull down this article and demonetize our page. I'm not kidding. They say this article "incites violence." It's literally a regurgitated joke from a Monty Python movie! — Seth Dillon (@SethDillon) October 20, 2020 https://t.co/U9B6tTOj6N ... And now, what you've all been waiting for - a colossal return to ethics. (Which of course requires an identification of colossal ethical failures...) The man is back, with a succinct if not brutal naming of the foundational failure of the political "left" ~today. 9mins and 44seconds putting $YOU at the winning front line of handling the lunatic "liberal" lefties: Jordan Peterson - The fatal flaw in leftist American politics _ Big Think http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UVUnUnWfHI Found here: Pay attention: Jordan Peterson explains the most dangerous and ultimately fatal flaw of modern-day leftism https://notthebee.com/article/pay-attention-jordan-peterson-explains-the-very-dangerous-and-ultimately-fatal-flaw-of-modern-day-leftism Peace muh grits, On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:51:45AM -0400, grarpamp wrote: > https://summit.news/2020/10/07/instagram-bans-qanon-accounts-but-refuses-to-remove-isis-accounts-celebrating-9-11/ > https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/instagram-bans-qanon-accounts-refuses-remove-isis-accounts-celebrating-911 > > Political censorship by entrenched partisan media... > > > " > Facebook-owned Instagram has announced that will ban all QAnon > accounts, including ones that don’t promote violence, while refusing > to remove ISIS propaganda accounts that celebrate 9/11 under the > justification that “people may express themselves differently.” > > In an update to its policy announced yesterday, Facebook said that it > was moving beyond a measure taken back in August that removed QAnon > accounts which contained “discussions of potential violence.” > > “We’ve seen other QAnon content tied to different forms of real > world harm, including recent claims that the west coast wildfires were > started by certain groups, which diverted attention of local officials > from fighting the fires,” said the social media giant. > > Facebook specified that it would “remove any Facebook Pages, Groups > and Instagram accounts representing QAnon, even if they contain no > violent content.” > > Many pointed out the hypocrisy of Antifa accounts still being allowed > on the platform despite the movement’s involvement in numerous violent > riots over the last six months. > > But not Antifa, even though they're literally a terrorist > organization with cells in every major city, complete with uniforms > and flags. https://t.co/mQAewCzGKW > — Mark Dice (@MarkDice) October 6, 2020 > > While banning all QAnon content, Instagram has simultaneously refused > to remove literal ISIS propaganda accounts that celebrate 9/11. > > As the Sun reveals, one such account posted an image of the World > Trade Center being hit by a plane along with the caption, “One of the > most beautiful scenes.” > > As recently as Sunday the Abogasm_1990 account posted an execution > clip, and was followed by “20 other pro-IS accounts with more than > 7,700 followers.” > > However, even after The Center for Countering Digital Hate reported > the accounts to Instagram, the social media network
Re: james donalds 'political philosophy'
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 05:06:10AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 18:08:07 +1100 > Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 03:54:36AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:54:12 +1100 > > > Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > > > > > You cannot nurture IQ into existence - > > > > > > 'IQ' is pseudo scientific bullshit. The fundamental fact is that > > > morality has fuck to do with being clever or good at math. Clever people > > > can be evil as fuck and 'dumb' people can be honest(or not) just like the > > > 'elites'. If anything 'clever' people are more likely to be assholes. > > > > > > Although it certaily seemc true that morality has nothing to with IQ, > > that's irrelevant to the point here: that there are genetic "racial" based > > differences. > > > skin color is completely irrelevant for morality/politics, just like > 'IQ'. Keep arguing an unrelated point I see :) Anyway, on the point at issue, IQ is at least 50% correlated with genetics: https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/understanding/traits/intelligence/ Many studies rely on a measure of intelligence called the intelligence quotient (IQ). Researchers have conducted many studies to look for genes that influence intelligence. ... These studies suggest that genetic factors underlie about 50 percent of the difference in intelligence among individuals. > > John wants to pretend those differences don't exist, and to the extent he > > believes his own rubbish, he is in practice at a disadvantage, but in t/his > > case I'm pretty sure it's merely political chicanery on his part (that is, > > that "even he doesn't believe the bullshit he types up"). >
Re: james donalds 'political philosophy'
> On Oct 21, 2020, at 21:25, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 08:41:11PM -0500, John Newman wrote: >> >>> On Oct 21, 2020, at 19:35, jam...@echeque.com wrote: >>> >>> I am pretty sure the great majority of blacks would inwardly want a gun >>> law specifically on blacks such as Bloomberg proposed, and a lot of them >>> would be so politically incorrect as to outwardly favor it. >>> >> >> I'm pretty sure you are brain damaged. >> >>> The majority of blacks favor laws on crack cocaine that clearly have, >>> and are clearly intended to have, disparate impact, and native Americans >>> support laws on alcohol that are barely wearing a fig leaf to disguise >>> their racial character. >> >> Do you have anything to back up either of those statements? You >> think blacks support laws that lock them up 2 or 3 or 4x as long >> for the same fucking drug by weight (active ingredient *cocaine* >> hydrochloride vs *cocaine* & baking soda)? >> >> I doubt it. >> >> However, in that same vein you never let go, your supposed racial >> lessers tendency towards *self-destruction* (a vein long mined, but >> still registering, blood rushing in thick and dark!) - fact-free >> bigots like yourself have ensured your own *self-destruction*, made >> sure you will always be fringe morons, good for a laugh, easily >> riled up, and of zero consequence. Your outspoken, outlandish, >> fucking disgusting beliefs aren't trendy, they're grotesque, and >> they aren't catching on. >> >> You support such a wide array of backwards takes on social issues >> - on things like gender equality, > > This might be one out of the box for you John, but the two sexes are actually > different. > The differences between the sexes, Z*vomit*, does not mean one (the male, of which you at least pretend to be a member) should continue to rape, beat, murder, and otherwise do what the fuck ever, just because. Equality of potential, equality under the "legal system", freedom from de-facto rule by the nearest and strongest man - obviously this is what I meant. >> race equality, > > And again, we get this is likely a radical concept, but actually the races > are different, with different characteristics and different aptitudes - I am > simply never going to out-marathon an equivalent Nigerian, given similar > training. > > Who is the "we" here? You and James? In any case - you're right! Races are different. But not the way you think.. https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/race-is-real-but-its-not-genetic https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2018/04/race-genetics-science-africa/ https://www.sapiens.org/biology/is-race-real/ Difference beyond a few superficial things in race is due to nurture, not nature. African and native american home countries were systematically exploited, plundered, exterminated, subjugated for slavery, etc, etc (its in even the history books you read) for hundreds of years (and still are). It's no surprise you can point to the fact that they haven't stood back up from their beating yet. I know your lot don't like to acknowledge actual factual, researched science, so I'm not going to keep on going here... >> on daddy beating >> the fuck out of mommy for ..er .. cuz James believes in a patriarchy! > > Extra extra! Read all about it! Newman's matriarchy is about to take over > the world... > Lol. You're a fucking idiot. > >> Indeed, I've always thought the right wing "christian/European", >> as he gets more and more extreme, curves back in towards the equally >> socially backwards and extreme "muslim/Arab", where they (you and >> your muslim doppelgänger) can meet, astonished to find someone else >> who believes in essentially the same social mores, customs unchanged >> for 1000+ year-old. The astonishment comes because its fringe fucking >> lunatic nonsense. > > Except, Islam is Right about women. So who's fringe now? Ha! > > >> Maybe you can find a high-dollar hooker, James, or a few of them, >> that will let you play out your fantasy of life in the Maghreb 1200 >> years ago. Somehow I doubt even this would make you happy. You don't >> seem the type for happiness. > > I can only imagine, but sorry to say but I don't think you're his type. > > Nice try though. Yeah, har-har. Don't worry dude, you'll lose that cherry some day. Lol, just kidding, you fucking noxious freak. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: james donalds 'political philosophy'
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 03:54:36AM -0300, Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 wrote: > On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 15:54:12 +1100 > Zenaan Harkness wrote: > > > You cannot nurture IQ into existence - > > 'IQ' is pseudo scientific bullshit. The fundamental fact is that > morality has fuck to do with being clever or good at math. Clever people can > be evil as fuck and 'dumb' people can be honest(or not) just like the > 'elites'. If anything 'clever' people are more likely to be assholes. Although it certaily seemc true that morality has nothing to with IQ, that's irrelevant to the point here: that there are genetic "racial" based differences. John wants to pretend those differences don't exist, and to the extent he believes his own rubbish, he is in practice at a disadvantage, but in t/his case I'm pretty sure it's merely political chicanery on his part (that is, that "even he doesn't believe the bullshit he types up").
