Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-12 Thread david

On Tuesday 11 February 2003 09:52, Dr. mike wrote:

 No reason we can't start a movement to plege alegiance to the
 constitution

The main body of the constitution does not apply to the 
individuals, it is the law the politicians and bureaucrats of the 
federal government are supposed to obey (and instead completely 
ignore).  The fourteenth amendment prohibits the state governments 
from violately individual rights.  What is needed is the death 
penalty or life imprisonment for politicians and bureaucrats who 
violate their oaths to uphold the constitution.

The proper recipient of a pledge of allegiance is individual 
liberty.  As Ben Franklin said, Where liberty dwells, there is my 
country.

David Neilson


This will be the best security for maintaining our liberties.  A 
nation of well-informed men who have been taught to know and prize 
the rights which God has given them cannot be enslaved.  It is in 
the religion of ignorance that tyranny begins.   (also by Ben)




Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-12 Thread Mike Rosing
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, david wrote:

 The main body of the constitution does not apply to the
 individuals, it is the law the politicians and bureaucrats of the
 federal government are supposed to obey (and instead completely
 ignore).  The fourteenth amendment prohibits the state governments
 from violately individual rights.  What is needed is the death
 penalty or life imprisonment for politicians and bureaucrats who
 violate their oaths to uphold the constitution.

 The proper recipient of a pledge of allegiance is individual
 liberty.  As Ben Franklin said, Where liberty dwells, there is my
 country.

I'm not arguing with this, but I think pledging is just symbolic
anyway.  We need to act free so that we are free.  It drives the control
freaks nuts, and that's more fun anyway :-)

Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike





RE: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-11 Thread Vincent Penquerc'h
 While I have a lot of problem with the Pledge in any form, I think it
 would be greatly improved if it were made to the Constitution, rather
 than the flag.

But wouldn't that hint to these children that they may actually
have to think ? You don't have to think of a flag, you just react
with (preprepared) emotions, but with a constitution...

I once went to the US, in a family, for a couple of weeks, and went
to high school there. I didn't know about it then, and it really
took me by surprise. The whole classroom standing up to the sound
the loudspeaker, like some show of warmongering made for TV in some
dictatorial country. Eerie.

Best of all was, we were a group of french people one day, in the
library, and this happened again. We looked at each other, and
tacitly decided to continue our stuff, silently, without at all
disrupting their ceremony. No more than two minutes after the end
of it, we got the head of the library come to us, knowing we were
french, and telling us we *had* to do it...
That was *years* ago.

You bet that after that, some people forget to think altogether
and refer back to this thorough brainwashing they had when they
were kids.

-- 
Vincent Penquerc'h 




RE: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-11 Thread Mike Rosing
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:

 But wouldn't that hint to these children that they may actually
 have to think ? You don't have to think of a flag, you just react
 with (preprepared) emotions, but with a constitution...

No reason we can't start a movement to plege alegiance to the constitution
:-)

 Best of all was, we were a group of french people one day, in the
 library, and this happened again. We looked at each other, and
 tacitly decided to continue our stuff, silently, without at all
 disrupting their ceremony. No more than two minutes after the end
 of it, we got the head of the library come to us, knowing we were
 french, and telling us we *had* to do it...
 That was *years* ago.

Some 40+ years ago we had to learn it in kindergarten.  One kid
refused and they took him out of class.  I never saw him again.
I think he had other problems (learning disability of some sort)
but you can bet it scared the shit out of the rest of us.  Ever
since I've despised the plege ceremony.  It really is brainwashing,
and it only works on the robots :-)

 You bet that after that, some people forget to think altogether
 and refer back to this thorough brainwashing they had when they
 were kids.

Unless it has an opposite effect, and you're scarred for life
to watch out for brainwashing.  It's interesting watching my
local community deal with it, we made national news last year by
*disallowing* the pledge (kids didn't have to say it).  Whooboy,
talk about a tempest in a teapot!

Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike




Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-11 Thread Jim Choate

On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Mike Rosing wrote:

 Some 40+ years ago we had to learn it in kindergarten.  One kid
 refused and they took him out of class.

His and the other kids parents were pussies.

I first went to school about the same time ago, 1966 in Houston. I didn't
do the pledge and they called my parents. The solution, I had to stand but
didn't have to say anything. So that's what I did. Worked for 12 years of
public school (of course after about the 4'th or 5'th grade I don't ever
remember having to do it in school except perhaps at assembly or a
sports event). Reminds me of the time in 5th grade when a teacher
threatened to tie me in a chair. I told her my mother would 'beat her
ass'. They called my mother, she asked the teacher and the principle if
the threat had been made. They said yes. She said I was right, she would
beat their asses. Pretty impressive from a women barely over 5ft. This
was the same women in high school who told the principle he had better things
to do with his time than bother me about not tucking my shirt in or having
long hair. I wish I had a picture of the instructor in the only time I
ever got detention (in HS) when they threatened me with more detention and
expulsion for long hair. 'Ripping them a new asshole' only begins to
describe. I did my three days and that was that.

I've never put my hand on my heart or said the pledge, don't ever intend
to either. I'll never sign an oath either. I've had people ask me about
it, a simple 'Fuck you' resolved the problem quite nicely.


 --


  We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
  are going to spend the rest of our lives.

  Criswell, Plan 9 from Outer Space

  [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.ssz.com   www.open-forge.org






RE: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-10 Thread Trei, Peter
 Bill Frantz[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[...]
 Unfortunately having started to question the relation between the pledge
 and the ideals of the country, I started to wonder why I was pledging to
 the flag, instead of the country.  So over the years, I have a somewhat
 edited version (removed parts in brackets):
[...]

One interesting variation  {and a suggestion of an alternative) comes from
naval diplomacy.

When there's an official US/UK naval dinner, toasts are drunk (at least on 
shore or on British ships - I think US ships are dry). The Americans
always toast the British Monarch. The Brits in return propose a toast
to the US Constitution.

While I have a lot of problem with the Pledge in any form, I think it
would be greatly improved if it were made to the Constitution, rather
than the flag.

Peter Trei




Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-09 Thread Sunder
And also freedom of religion.  Forcing someone to say Under God for
example.

--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
 + ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
  \|/  :and didn't stop 9-11|share them, you don't hang them on your/\|/\
--*--:Instead of rewarding|monitor, or under your keyboard, you   \/|\/
  /|\  :their failures, we  |don't email them, or put them on a web  \|/
 + v + :should get refunds! |site, and you must change them very often.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sunder.net 

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Major Variola (ret) wrote:

 At 12:22 AM 2/8/03 +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
  But recite they must. Under a state law that takes effect today,
 almost
  every student in Pennsylvania - from preschool through high school,
 in
  schools public and private - must face the Stars and Stripes each
 school
  day and say the pledge or sing the national anthem.
 
 Are there any penalties for refusing to take part in this circus?
 If yes, isn't the contract - pledge - forced, and hence legally
 invalid?
 
 The 1st prohibits both State banning and the *compulsion* of speech, as
 this
 clearly is an example of.




Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-09 Thread Tim May
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, at 10:57  AM, Bill Frantz wrote:


At 6:55 AM -0800 2/9/03, Sunder wrote:

And also freedom of religion.  Forcing someone to say Under God for
example.


Back in the dark ages (the 1950s, and don't anyone get nostalgic for 
them),
when the phrase under god was added to the pledge, I was a student in
school.  From what they had taught me, I knew then that this addition
violated the establishment of religion clause.  The solution I devised 
was
to simply remain silent when this phrase was said.

During the possibly more radical 60s, some of us uttered under Satan 
during this sequence. One of my friends got a trip to the Principal's 
office for this, where he explained that he believed in Satan and that 
God was just a pretender, and if the Principal could demonstrate that 
the U.S. officially recognizes one deity over another he would 
reconsider.


Unfortunately having started to question the relation between the 
pledge
and the ideals of the country, I started to wonder why I was pledging 
to
the flag, instead of the country.  So over the years, I have a somewhat
edited version (removed parts in brackets):

I don't pledge to either a flag or a country. I just live here. And 
this is where the stuff I own is located. All I ask of government is 
that they stay out of my way.


--Tim May



Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-09 Thread Bill Frantz
At 6:55 AM -0800 2/9/03, Sunder wrote:
And also freedom of religion.  Forcing someone to say Under God for
example.

Back in the dark ages (the 1950s, and don't anyone get nostalgic for them),
when the phrase under god was added to the pledge, I was a student in
school.  From what they had taught me, I knew then that this addition
violated the establishment of religion clause.  The solution I devised was
to simply remain silent when this phrase was said.

Unfortunately having started to question the relation between the pledge
and the ideals of the country, I started to wonder why I was pledging to
the flag, instead of the country.  So over the years, I have a somewhat
edited version (removed parts in brackets):

   I pledge allegiance to [the flag of] the United States of America
   [and to the republic for which it stands], one nation [under god],
   indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Except for the fact that one should not trust pledges that are made under
coercion, I am reasonably comfortable with this edited version.  It
expresses the ideal nation that I wish the United States would become.

Cheers - Bill




-
Bill Frantz   | Due process for all| Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | used to be the Ameican | 16345 Englewood Ave.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | way.   | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA




Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-09 Thread Steve Schear
At 11:34 AM 2/9/2003 -0800, Tim May wrote:

On Sunday, February 9, 2003, at 10:57  AM, Bill Frantz wrote:
Unfortunately having started to question the relation between the pledge

and the ideals of the country, I started to wonder why I was pledging to
the flag, instead of the country.  So over the years, I have a somewhat
edited version (removed parts in brackets):


I don't pledge to either a flag or a country. I just live here. And this 
is where the stuff I own is located. All I ask of government is that they 
stay out of my way.

I think parents should teach their children that they should condition the 
recital of the pledge to when those elected to office are routinely held 
accountable to breaches of the oath of office.

steve



Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-09 Thread Tyler Durden
Bill Frantz wrote...

Except for the fact that one should not trust pledges that are made under 
coercion, I am reasonably comfortable with this edited version.  It 
expresses the ideal nation that I wish the United States would become.

Well, this is probably a lot better than nothing, particularly for a young 
person.

But for someone older I would suggest that this is, to some extent, a dodge.

Why? Because who is it you are pledging TO? The notion of the Pledge of 
Alleigiance as we know it is a public proclamation of one's affinities. And 
in this case, if no one in authority can make out that certain portions of 
the Pledge are not being stated, then I would argue that not stating them is 
almost as good as useless. It's kind of like a kid crossing his fingers 
behind his back while telling a promise, to negate the lie of the promise.

-TD







From: Bill Frantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2003 10:57:14 -0800

At 6:55 AM -0800 2/9/03, Sunder wrote:
And also freedom of religion.  Forcing someone to say Under God for
example.

Back in the dark ages (the 1950s, and don't anyone get nostalgic for them),
when the phrase under god was added to the pledge, I was a student in
school.  From what they had taught me, I knew then that this addition
violated the establishment of religion clause.  The solution I devised was
to simply remain silent when this phrase was said.

Unfortunately having started to question the relation between the pledge
and the ideals of the country, I started to wonder why I was pledging to
the flag, instead of the country.  So over the years, I have a somewhat
edited version (removed parts in brackets):

   I pledge allegiance to [the flag of] the United States of America
   [and to the republic for which it stands], one nation [under god],
   indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Except for the fact that one should not trust pledges that are made under
coercion, I am reasonably comfortable with this edited version.  It
expresses the ideal nation that I wish the United States would become.

Cheers - Bill




-
Bill Frantz   | Due process for all| Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | used to be the Ameican | 16345 Englewood Ave.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | way.   | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA



_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail



Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-08 Thread Bill Stewart
An interesting story on future citizen-units being brainscrubbed in the
lovely state of Pennsylvania.
http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/5124933.htm
...
But recite they must. Under a state law that takes effect today, almost
every student in Pennsylvania - from preschool through high school, in
schools public and private - must face the Stars and Stripes each school
day and say the pledge or sing the national anthem.

It is one of the most stringent pledge laws in the United States, said
Greta Durr, a researcher for the National Conference of State
Legislatures, which tracks state lawmaking across the nation.


From http://www.mclu.org/nottospeak.htm
Minersville School District vs. Gobitis - 310 U.S. 586, 60 S. Ct. 1136 (1940).
The Supreme Court upheld a Pennsylvania school district that expelled
two Jehovah's Witness students for refusing to pledge allegiance to an idol;
their religion also forbade them to do the Heil Hitler salute.

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 63 S. Ct. 
1178 (1943).
The Supremes reversed themselves on a similar case, something they rarely do.

The recent 9th Circuit court decision deleting under God from
the mandatory idol-worshipping doesn't yet apply to Pennsylvania.

Leaving aside the issues of forcing kids to recite something they
don't understand or affirm something they don't believe,
there's the little problem that if the teachers are going to
pledge their allegiance to the Republic, they need to start
following the First Amendment, and also throwing out the lawmakers
who've violated their oaths to uphold the Constitution.

And since they're not in the 9th District, so they've still got the
under God part, the legislators are going to have to start
cleaning up their act a lot on the God parts too,
and I do *not* mean by forcing other people to believe things they don't...



Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-08 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 12:22 AM 2/8/03 +0100, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
 But recite they must. Under a state law that takes effect today,
almost
 every student in Pennsylvania - from preschool through high school,
in
 schools public and private - must face the Stars and Stripes each
school
 day and say the pledge or sing the national anthem.

Are there any penalties for refusing to take part in this circus?
If yes, isn't the contract - pledge - forced, and hence legally
invalid?

The 1st prohibits both State banning and the *compulsion* of speech, as
this
clearly is an example of.




Re: Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-08 Thread Steve Schear
At 07:18 PM 2/7/2003 -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
Leaving aside the issues of forcing kids to recite something they

don't understand or affirm something they don't believe,
there's the little problem that if the teachers are going to
pledge their allegiance to the Republic, they need to start
following the First Amendment, and also throwing out the lawmakers
who've violated their oaths to uphold the Constitution.


They also need to delete references to Republic.  Since the Second 
American Revolution (i.e., Civil War) what we have is little more than a 
Republic in name only.


Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be 
fooled.
-- Richard P. Feynman



Forced Oaths to Pieces of Cloth

2003-02-07 Thread Eric Cordian
An interesting story on future citizen-units being brainscrubbed in the
lovely state of Pennsylvania.

http://www.philly.com/mld/philly/news/5124933.htm

-

Pledge law brings out opinions of all stripes
By Dan Hardy
Inquirer Staff Writer

A roomful of Coatesville Head Start students, ages 3, 4 and 5, put their
hands over their hearts Monday morning and did their best to recite the
Pledge of Allegiance together for the first time.

They struggled through phrases such as one nation under God, indivisible
as they tried to stand still long enough to complete the pledge, a ritual
usually played out in classrooms of older students.

The youngsters could hardly grasp the meaning of the words they were
reciting. We've got a long ways to go; this is just the start, their
teacher, Karen Carter, said with a laugh.

But recite they must. Under a state law that takes effect today, almost
every student in Pennsylvania - from preschool through high school, in
schools public and private - must face the Stars and Stripes each school
day and say the pledge or sing the national anthem.

It is one of the most stringent pledge laws in the United States, said
Greta Durr, a researcher for the National Conference of State
Legislatures, which tracks state lawmaking across the nation.

...

-- 
Eric Michael Cordian 0+
O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division
Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law