Re: CyberShamans who claim to be only mildly interested in Wicca

2003-04-05 Thread Jim Choate

On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Tim May wrote:

 I said many texts.

Which isn't the point, the point was 'bible'. You executed a strawman and
nobody seems to have noticed. Typical CACL.

Of course any word that exists is going to show up in 'many texts' if you
look hard enough. Your 'point' is specious.

 Religious scholarship is a hell of a lot more than
 just the several texts you cite which choose not to use this name.

Religous scholarship isn't, it's an exercise in fantasy and psy-ops. It
plays on peoples inborn fear of the unknown.

[Rest of Tim's self-agrandizing bullshit deleted]


 --


  We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
  are going to spend the rest of our lives.

  Criswell, Plan 9 from Outer Space

  [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.ssz.com   www.open-forge.org




Re: CyberShamans who claim to be only mildly interested in Wicca

2003-04-05 Thread Jim Choate

On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:

I noticed, but arguing with Tim is rather pointless. If he tried to refute
 primary sources with tertiary sources in a paper at any university he'd not only
 get an F but probably some very nasty comments from the prof as well.
So when you're dealing with someone who resorts to that kind of crap, what's
 the point?

Excellent!

The reason I do it is not to bang heads with Tim (he's welcome to whatever
fucking nutiness he prefers) but there are others out there who will get
the wrong idea if it's not refuted reasonably regularly. They haven't made
up their minds and because of their unfamiliarity [1] with the various
issues they may be a monotonic viewpoint. That just exacerbates the
problem by creating more 'Tim's'. If nothing else it lets them know that
there -are- other views out there that can stand toe-to-toe, and at least
give as good as they get.

Personaly, one of him is enough ;)

Outside of that it is pointless, and one of the reasons that over the
years of my participation in this list I've dropped my interaction with
him more and more.

[1] I'm in a discussion on a private list with a person who believes the
the way to solve Iraq's problems is to import Soccer (actually more
generally, sports) into their culture. My responce that forcing
western views on them at the expense of their consent and culture is
just plain evil. I got the typical knuckeheaded response that if I
didn't like it I should move. I responded that I intend to stay and
fight for my country and what it -really- stands for. For some
reason Americans in general don't seem able to keen the distinction
between ones 'country' and its 'government'. More of tha religous
type psy-ops I suspect.

It reminds me of a picture I saw on CNN of one of our aircraft
carries with a list of various events against American forces
in the Middle East, it was titled Why we are hear trying to
cast the fact we are acting in self-defense irrespective of the
fact that it is -us- in their backyard with big guns. Why are we
here? Because we can't keep our nose out of other peoples business
and believe that 'I want' justifies taking something. In short,
if anyone believes 'greed is good' they only need to look at the
news for a excellent example of why that view is simply bullshit.

I simply refer them to Verne's books Paris in the 20th Century
and Invasion of the Sea. If one doesn't 'get it' by the end of
those two, they never will. The latter is an excellent answer as
to why the Middle East is the way it is, and why 'we' (as in
Western civilization) are responsible and the wrong-doer here.


 --


  We are all interested in the future for that is where you and I
  are going to spend the rest of our lives.

  Criswell, Plan 9 from Outer Space

  [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.ssz.com   www.open-forge.org





Re: CyberShamans who claim to be only mildly interested in Wicca

2003-04-05 Thread Harmon Seaver
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 08:39:57AM -0600, Jim Choate wrote:
 On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Tim May wrote:
 
  I said many texts.
 
 Which isn't the point, the point was 'bible'. You executed a strawman and
 nobody seems to have noticed. Typical CACL.

   I noticed, but arguing with Tim is rather pointless. If he tried to refute
primary sources with tertiary sources in a paper at any university he'd not only
get an F but probably some very nasty comments from the prof as well. 
   So when you're dealing with someone who resorts to that kind of crap, what's
the point?


-- 
Harmon Seaver   
CyberShamanix
http://www.cybershamanix.com



Re: CyberShamans who claim to be only mildly interested in Wicca

2003-04-05 Thread Mike Rosing
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003, Harmon Seaver wrote:

I noticed, but arguing with Tim is rather pointless. If he tried to refute
 primary sources with tertiary sources in a paper at any university he'd not only
 get an F but probably some very nasty comments from the prof as well.
So when you're dealing with someone who resorts to that kind of crap, what's
 the point?

Careful Harmon,  Tim might plonk you for that :-)  You know, maybe in a
while he'll have plonked everyone and he won't actually respond to
anything on this list.  And you're right, there's no point in arguing with
someone who's certain they know everything there is to know about
everything.

Patience, persistence, truth,
Dr. mike