[darktable-dev] Error on git update
Manjaro 18, darktable 3.0.0rc1+54~gbfecbb5ca: I have been getting an error message at the initial install and when the git is up dated "darktable-git: transaction not initialized". Everything appears to be running correctly. Am I missing something? David ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Fwd: [darktable-dev] Bulk operations miss some images
Sorry, this was supposed to be reply to all. -- Forwarded message - Von: Jochen Keil Date: Do., 21. Nov. 2019, 19:11 Subject: Re: [darktable-dev] Bulk operations miss some images To: That's good to know! I will see if I can allocate some time to get an isolated dev version running to see if I can still trigger the bug. Until then I'll just patiently wait for my Christmas present :) schrieb am Do., 21. Nov. 2019, 16:19: > Yes, it's probably one of the race conditions that have been fixed for 3.0 > and won't be backported. > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:07 PM +0100, "Jochen Keil" < > jochen.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Nicolas, >> >> I can confirm that I'm on 2.6.3. >> >> Here's some more information. If you need to know more, please let me >> know. >> >> Btw, to my (untrained) eye this looks like a race condition or so.. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Jochen >> >> $ darktable --version >> this is darktable 2.6.3 >> copyright (c) 2009-2019 johannes hanika >> darktable-dev@lists.darktable.org >> >> compile options: >> bit depth is 64 bit >> normal build >> SSE2 optimized codepath enabled >> OpenMP support enabled >> OpenCL support enabled >> Lua support enabled, API version 5.0.1 >> Colord support enabled >> gPhoto2 support enabled >> GraphicsMagick support enabled >> OpenEXR support enabled >> >> Linux monolith Linux monolith 4.15.0-69-generic #78-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 6 >> 11:30:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> 4.15.0-69-generic #78-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 6 11:30:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 >> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> Ubuntu 18.04 LTS >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:57 PM Jochen Keil >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Nicholas, >>> >>> I get my packages from here: >>> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/graphics:darktable:stable >>> >>> I wrote 2.6.0 because I wasn't sure about the version, but I did an >>> update recently and I'm pretty sure I'm on 2.6.3. Sorry for the confusion. >>> >>> So, my bug report is still valid for 2.6.3. However, I might check at >>> home tonight to verify that I'm really on 2.6.3. >>> >>> Cheers! >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:41 PM Nicolas Auffray < >>> nicolas.auff...@zaclys.net> wrote: >>> The latest stable is 2.6.3 and we are on rc1 for next 3.0 stable. Many things fixed since 2.6.0. So please update to 2.6.3 before. > Le 21 nov. 2019 à 08:24, Jochen Keil a écrit : > > > Hello, > > I have a recurring problem with darktable (v2.6.0 - latest stable). > > I do a lot of bulk operations e.g. either by selecting all pictures (hundreds, I use C+a) and using "Paste All" with "overwrite" or by applying a style. > > I noticed various different behaviors on some images (maybe 5-10 in 1000). > > For some, the stack won't be copied at all or the style would not be applied. For others, "overwrite" would not work and just append to the existing stack. > > Both results are undesirable and hard to spot, especially because I would like not to wait for the previews, but directly run a bulk export. > > Thank you, > > Jochen > > ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > = >> ___ >> darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to >> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org >> > ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-dev] Bulk operations miss some images
Yes, it's probably one of the race conditions that have been fixed for 3.0 and won't be backported. On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 4:07 PM +0100, "Jochen Keil" wrote: Hi Nicolas, I can confirm that I'm on 2.6.3. Here's some more information. If you need to know more, please let me know. Btw, to my (untrained) eye this looks like a race condition or so.. Thank you, Jochen $ darktable --version this is darktable 2.6.3 copyright (c) 2009-2019 johannes hanika darktable-dev@lists.darktable.org compile options: bit depth is 64 bit normal build SSE2 optimized codepath enabled OpenMP support enabled OpenCL support enabled Lua support enabled, API version 5.0.1 Colord support enabled gPhoto2 support enabled GraphicsMagick support enabled OpenEXR support enabled Linux monolith Linux monolith 4.15.0-69-generic #78-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 6 11:30:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 4.15.0-69-generic #78-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 6 11:30:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Ubuntu 18.04 LTS On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:57 PM Jochen Keil wrote: Hi Nicholas, I get my packages from here: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/graphics:darktable:stable I wrote 2.6.0 because I wasn't sure about the version, but I did an update recently and I'm pretty sure I'm on 2.6.3. Sorry for the confusion. So, my bug report is still valid for 2.6.3. However, I might check at home tonight to verify that I'm really on 2.6.3. Cheers! On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:41 PM Nicolas Auffray wrote: The latest stable is 2.6.3 and we are on rc1 for next 3.0 stable. Many things fixed since 2.6.0. So please update to 2.6.3 before. > Le 21 nov. 2019 à 08:24, Jochen Keil a écrit : > > > Hello, > > I have a recurring problem with darktable (v2.6.0 - latest stable). > > I do a lot of bulk operations e.g. either by selecting all pictures > (hundreds, I use C+a) and using "Paste All" with "overwrite" or by applying > a style. > > I noticed various different behaviors on some images (maybe 5-10 in 1000). > > For some, the stack won't be copied at all or the style would not be applied. > For others, "overwrite" would not work and just append to the existing stack. > > Both results are undesirable and hard to spot, especially because I would > like not to wait for the previews, but directly run a bulk export. > > Thank you, > > Jochen > > ___ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > = ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-dev] Bulk operations miss some images
Hi Nicolas, I can confirm that I'm on 2.6.3. Here's some more information. If you need to know more, please let me know. Btw, to my (untrained) eye this looks like a race condition or so.. Thank you, Jochen $ darktable --version this is darktable 2.6.3 copyright (c) 2009-2019 johannes hanika darktable-dev@lists.darktable.org compile options: bit depth is 64 bit normal build SSE2 optimized codepath enabled OpenMP support enabled OpenCL support enabled Lua support enabled, API version 5.0.1 Colord support enabled gPhoto2 support enabled GraphicsMagick support enabled OpenEXR support enabled Linux monolith Linux monolith 4.15.0-69-generic #78-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 6 11:30:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 4.15.0-69-generic #78-Ubuntu SMP Wed Nov 6 11:30:24 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Ubuntu 18.04 LTS On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:57 PM Jochen Keil wrote: > Hi Nicholas, > > I get my packages from here: > https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/graphics:darktable:stable > > I wrote 2.6.0 because I wasn't sure about the version, but I did an update > recently and I'm pretty sure I'm on 2.6.3. Sorry for the confusion. > > So, my bug report is still valid for 2.6.3. However, I might check at home > tonight to verify that I'm really on 2.6.3. > > Cheers! > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:41 PM Nicolas Auffray < > nicolas.auff...@zaclys.net> wrote: > >> The latest stable is 2.6.3 and we are on rc1 for next 3.0 stable. Many >> things fixed since 2.6.0. So please update to 2.6.3 before. >> >> > Le 21 nov. 2019 à 08:24, Jochen Keil a écrit : >> > >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > I have a recurring problem with darktable (v2.6.0 - latest stable). >> > >> > I do a lot of bulk operations e.g. either by selecting all pictures >> (hundreds, I use C+a) and using "Paste All" with "overwrite" or by >> applying a style. >> > >> > I noticed various different behaviors on some images (maybe 5-10 in >> 1000). >> > >> > For some, the stack won't be copied at all or the style would not be >> applied. For others, "overwrite" would not work and just append to the >> existing stack. >> > >> > Both results are undesirable and hard to spot, especially because I >> would like not to wait for the previews, but directly run a bulk export. >> > >> > Thank you, >> > >> > Jochen >> > >> > >> ___ >> darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to >> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org >> > = >> >> ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-dev] Bulk operations miss some images
Hi Nicholas, I get my packages from here: https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/graphics:darktable:stable I wrote 2.6.0 because I wasn't sure about the version, but I did an update recently and I'm pretty sure I'm on 2.6.3. Sorry for the confusion. So, my bug report is still valid for 2.6.3. However, I might check at home tonight to verify that I'm really on 2.6.3. Cheers! On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:41 PM Nicolas Auffray wrote: > The latest stable is 2.6.3 and we are on rc1 for next 3.0 stable. Many > things fixed since 2.6.0. So please update to 2.6.3 before. > > > Le 21 nov. 2019 à 08:24, Jochen Keil a écrit : > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I have a recurring problem with darktable (v2.6.0 - latest stable). > > > > I do a lot of bulk operations e.g. either by selecting all pictures > (hundreds, I use C+a) and using "Paste All" with "overwrite" or by > applying a style. > > > > I noticed various different behaviors on some images (maybe 5-10 in > 1000). > > > > For some, the stack won't be copied at all or the style would not be > applied. For others, "overwrite" would not work and just append to the > existing stack. > > > > Both results are undesirable and hard to spot, especially because I > would like not to wait for the previews, but directly run a bulk export. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Jochen > > > > > ___ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > = > > ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Re: [darktable-dev] Bulk operations miss some images
The latest stable is 2.6.3 and we are on rc1 for next 3.0 stable. Many things fixed since 2.6.0. So please update to 2.6.3 before. > Le 21 nov. 2019 à 08:24, Jochen Keil a écrit : > > > Hello, > > I have a recurring problem with darktable (v2.6.0 - latest stable). > > I do a lot of bulk operations e.g. either by selecting all pictures > (hundreds, I use C+a) and using "Paste All" with "overwrite" or by applying > a style. > > I noticed various different behaviors on some images (maybe 5-10 in 1000). > > For some, the stack won't be copied at all or the style would not be applied. > For others, "overwrite" would not work and just append to the existing stack. > > Both results are undesirable and hard to spot, especially because I would > like not to wait for the previews, but directly run a bulk export. > > Thank you, > > Jochen > > ___ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > = ___ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
