Re: [darktable-user] darktable 2.2.0 rc0 released

2016-11-12 Thread junkyardsparkle 


On Sat, Nov 12, 2016, at 03:52, Roman Lebedev wrote:

> Please try adding 2 following lines:
> fprintf(stderr, "%s roi in %d %d %d %d\n", self->name(), roi_in->x,
> roi_in->y, roi_in->width, roi_in->height);
> fprintf(stderr, "%s roi out %d %d %d %d\n", self->name(), roi_out->x,
> roi_out->y, roi_out->width, roi_out->height);
> 
> For 2.0.x, here:
> https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/darktable-2.0.x/src/iop/denoiseprofile.c#L1384
> 
> And for master, here
> https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/master/src/iop/denoiseprofile.c#L1789
> AND here 
> https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/master/src/iop/denoiseprofile.c#L1800
> 
> And repeat that -d perf, zoom to 1:1 and move around.

Logfiles attached. I just patched 2.0.7 and the release candidate, if I need to 
actually pull from current master, let me know, but it might not happen until 
after the weekend.

-- 
jys


darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org[dev] took 0.401 secs (0.390 CPU) to load the image.
[dev] took 0.396 secs (0.385 CPU) to load the image.
[export] creating pixelpipe took 0.140 secs (0.261 CPU)
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.000 secs (0.000 CPU) initing base buffer [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.003 secs (0.004 CPU) processed `raw black/white point' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.004 secs (0.004 CPU) processed `white balance' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.002 secs (0.003 CPU) processed `highlight reconstruction' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
denoise (profiled) roi in 0 0 597 447
denoise (profiled) roi out 0 0 597 447
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.101 secs (0.157 CPU) processed `denoise (profiled)' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.120 secs (0.220 CPU) processed `lens correction' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.011 secs (0.016 CPU) processed `input color profile' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev] took 0.000 secs (-0.000 CPU) to load the image.
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.020 secs (0.031 CPU) processed `output color profile' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.003 secs (0.004 CPU) processed `gamma' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_process_thumbnail] pixel pipeline processing took 0.274 secs (0.458 CPU)
[export] creating pixelpipe took 0.140 secs (0.192 CPU)
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.009 secs (0.017 CPU) initing base buffer [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.000 secs (-0.000 CPU) processed `raw black/white point' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.000 secs (-0.000 CPU) processed `white balance' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.000 secs (0.001 CPU) processed `highlight reconstruction' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
denoise (profiled) roi in 0 0 146 110
denoise (profiled) roi out 0 0 146 110
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.003 secs (0.005 CPU) processed `denoise (profiled)' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.005 secs (0.009 CPU) processed `lens correction' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.000 secs (0.001 CPU) processed `input color profile' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.001 secs (0.001 CPU) processed `output color profile' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.000 secs (-0.000 CPU) processed `gamma' on CPU, blended on CPU [thumbnail]
[dev_process_thumbnail] pixel pipeline processing took 0.020 secs (0.035 CPU)
[dev] took 0.000 secs (0.000 CPU) to load the image.
[dev] took 0.000 secs (-0.000 CPU) to load the image.
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.021 secs (0.019 CPU) initing base buffer [full]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.019 secs (0.019 CPU) processed `raw black/white point' on CPU, blended on CPU [full]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.023 secs (0.023 CPU) processed `white balance' on CPU, blended on CPU [full]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.022 secs (0.024 CPU) processed `highlight reconstruction' on CPU, blended on CPU [full]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 1.004 secs (1.759 CPU) processed `demosaic' on CPU, blended on CPU [full]
denoise (profiled) roi in 0 0 748 561
denoise (profiled) roi out 0 0 748 561
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.151 secs (0.289 CPU) processed `denoise (profiled)' on CPU, blended on CPU [full]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.118 secs (0.228 CPU) processed `lens correction' on CPU, blended on CPU [full]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.009 secs (0.017 CPU) processed `input color profile' on CPU, blended on CPU [full]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.021 secs (0.031 CPU) processed `output color profile' on CPU, blended on CPU [full]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.003 secs (0.003 CPU) processed `gamma' on CPU, blended on CPU [full]
[dev_process_image] pixel pipeline processing took 1.403 secs (2.430 CPU)
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.000 secs (0.000 CPU) initing base buffer [preview]
[dev_pixelpipe] took 0.003 secs (0.003 CPU) processed `raw black/white point' on CPU, blended on C

Re: [darktable-user] Sony’s Camera Remote API Support?

2016-11-12 Thread Colton 
This would be related to the "tethering" feature in darktable.  gphoto is
not plainly listed on either the wiki or the camera support page but is
included in the overview of the feature in chapter for this feature.
Unfortunately I missed that line when skimming the section.

I will have a look at the gphoto lib.
Thanks,

https://www.darktable.org/usermanual/ch04.html.php
https://www.darktable.org/resources/camera-support/

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 4:13 AM Roman Lebedev  wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Colton  wrote:
> > Does Darktable support Sony's WiFi API?
> How is that a darktable issue?
> I would guess it's a gphoto problem.
>
> > If not would someone point me to the wiki pages for the camera
> interfaces?
> > Can some with past experience let me know if there implementing can let
> me
> > know how long previous implementations have taken?
> >
> > https://developer.sony.com/develop/cameras/
> >
> > Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> >
> 
> > darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
> > darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>


darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Re: [darktable-user] darktable 2.2.0 rc0 released

2016-11-12 Thread Roman Lebedev 
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:08 AM,   wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016, at 13:55, Roman Lebedev wrote:
>
>> Hm, so the speed decrease is for the full pipe, which is for main darkroom 
>> view.
>> I expected to see a problem in preview pipe.
>>
>> How did you get darktable?
>
> Built on Slackware64 14.2, with the same build options I've been using for 
> latest releases:
>
>   cmake \
> -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS:STRING=-O2 -fPIC \
> -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS:STRING=-O2 -fPIC\
> -DOPENJPEG_LIBRARY="/usr/lib64/libopenmj2.so" \
> -DOPENJPEG_INCLUDE_DIR="/usr/include/openmj2-2.1" \
> -DDONT_USE_INTERNAL_LUA=Off \
> -DUSE_LIBSECRET=On \
> -DUSE_GNOME_KEYRING=Off \
> -DBINARY_PACKAGE_BUILD=1 \
> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ..
>
>
>
>> What does this say (for 2.2.0rc0):
>> $ grep codepath ~/.config/darktable/darktablerc
>
> codepaths/openmp_simd=false
> codepaths/sse2=true
>
>> Also, please show me whole darktable output when you just start it and
>> then close it, without any  -d  options.

> There is none.
Good, i suppose.

> I'd be willing to build a debug version if that would help.
Debug build will not help.

Please try adding 2 following lines:
fprintf(stderr, "%s roi in %d %d %d %d\n", self->name(), roi_in->x,
roi_in->y, roi_in->width, roi_in->height);
fprintf(stderr, "%s roi out %d %d %d %d\n", self->name(), roi_out->x,
roi_out->y, roi_out->width, roi_out->height);

For 2.0.x, here:
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/darktable-2.0.x/src/iop/denoiseprofile.c#L1384

And for master, here
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/master/src/iop/denoiseprofile.c#L1789
AND here 
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/master/src/iop/denoiseprofile.c#L1800

And repeat that -d perf, zoom to 1:1 and move around.

> --
> jys
Roman.

darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Re: [darktable-user] Sony’s Camera Remote API Support?

2016-11-12 Thread Roman Lebedev 
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Colton  wrote:
> Does Darktable support Sony's WiFi API?
How is that a darktable issue?
I would guess it's a gphoto problem.

> If not would someone point me to the wiki pages for the camera interfaces?
> Can some with past experience let me know if there implementing can let me
> know how long previous implementations have taken?
>
> https://developer.sony.com/develop/cameras/
>
> Thanks,
Roman.

> 
> darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
> darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org