Re: Hi, I am blind

2018-04-17 Thread Samuel Thibault
Paul Wise, le mar. 17 avril 2018 11:20:15 +0800, a ecrit:
> On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 10:15 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> 
> > Well, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855446
> 
> accessible-via seems different to what I propose.
> 
> accessible-via references software that makes each package accessible.

Not exactly software, but the kind of support that software provides:
braille, speech, and which software because that makes a technical
difference in the quality of the information provided.

> The proposed accessible-to would reference classes of abilities that
> are required to use the package. For example accessible-to::sighted.
> I've no idea if this sort of thing would be useful though.

The problem is that "abilities" is a terrible beast to define. "sighted"
for instance does not mean anything, since there is an extremely wide
range of sightedness, which can't for instance actually be reduced a
single "quality" scalar value as opticians define. "being able to read
written braille", "being able to hear speech synthesis", "being able to
read a zoomed display", however, does mean something to users, thus the
accessible-via tags.

> > but it seems https://debtags.debian.org/ hasn't gotten updated yet.
> 
> I'd suggest filing another bug about that.

Eww.

Samuel



Re: Hi, I am blind

2018-04-16 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2018-04-16 at 10:15 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:

> Well, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855446

accessible-via seems different to what I propose.

accessible-via references software that makes each package accessible.

The proposed accessible-to would reference classes of abilities that
are required to use the package. For example accessible-to::sighted.
I've no idea if this sort of thing would be useful though.

> but it seems https://debtags.debian.org/ hasn't gotten updated yet.

I'd suggest filing another bug about that.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Hi, I am blind

2018-04-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello,

Paul Wise, le lun. 16 avril 2018 10:05:52 +0800, a ecrit:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 6:20 AM, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe wrote:
> > For example, adding a tag to mention if some package is or not
> > accessible would be a good idea.
> 
> There is already an accessibility facet, but it covers tools:
> 
> https://debtags.debian.org/reports/facets/accessibility
> 
> I guess the way to go would be to create a new accessible-to:: facet
> indicating which groups of abilities that each package is accessible
> to. A bug against debtags with some initial set of tags would be the
> way to start on this.

Well, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855446 already
got uploaded, but it seems 
https://debtags.debian.org/
hasn't gotten updated yet.

Samuel



Re: Hi, I am blind

2018-04-14 Thread Alex ARNAUD

Le 14/04/2018 à 08:56, adri Orjales Vidal a écrit :

Hello, I am blind and I need to use a screen reader so I can use my pc. I am 
tired to use windows, and I wanted to start using Devian, but here I saw that 
the screen reader Orca is kilometers away from NVDA, non visual desktop access, 
wich is a windows screen reader very fast. NVDA is open source, and it is 
developed over python
I think that if you are able to add it in Devian I will be the happiest man in 
the world!!
If it is not possible, please you should update Orca, the screen readers are 
more useful when are low level of system development, so you must change the 
way to make it really useful


Hello adri,

If you're a beginner in the GNU/Linux world, I don't advise you to 
upgrade Orca and the accessibility stack from stretch-backports as they 
can be broken. backports of Debian are not as tested as the regular 
distribution. I've tested it quickly on one my VM and I confirm that it 
works.


Could you explain us why do you think Orca is far away from NVDA?
I'm using Orca everyday and advanced users of NVDA have switch to Orca 
and are really happy with it. Orca provides most of the feature NVDA has.


Best regards,
Alex.



Re: Hi, I am blind

2018-04-14 Thread Fernando Botelho
It would be more useful if you both gave a list of specific things in 
Orca, which you would like improved. Nobody responds to generic 
complaints, since those of us in Linux are using Orca and other screen 
readers because we like them mostly as they are.



Fernando



On 04/14/2018 02:37 PM, Chime Hart wrote:
Well Adri, actually I have writtin folks at NVDA requesting them to 
make a Linux version. Along with yourself, I wish they did. Their flat 
review is almost exactly what we enjoy in Speakup, which is console or 
command-line based. Maybe if there were a graphical screen-reader in 
Linux with a similar feel to windows98, more blind folks would jump in.

Chime





Re: Hi, I am blind

2018-04-14 Thread Chime Hart
Well Adri, actually I have writtin folks at NVDA requesting them to make a Linux 
version. Along with yourself, I wish they did. Their flat review is almost 
exactly what we enjoy in Speakup, which is console or command-line based. Maybe 
if there were a graphical screen-reader in Linux with a similar feel to 
windows98, more blind folks would jump in.

Chime



Hi, I am blind

2018-04-14 Thread adri Orjales Vidal
Hello, I am blind and I need to use a screen reader so I can use my pc. I am 
tired to use windows, and I wanted to start using Devian, but here I saw that 
the screen reader Orca is kilometers away from NVDA, non visual desktop access, 
wich is a windows screen reader very fast. NVDA is open source, and it is 
developed over python
I think that if you are able to add it in Devian I will be the happiest man in 
the world!!
If it is not possible, please you should update Orca, the screen readers are 
more useful when are low level of system development, so you must change the 
way to make it really useful
Please, blind people need help in Devian based distributions like itself

Please feel free to visit the NVDA webpage
Nvaccess.org


Re: Hi, I am blind

2018-04-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello,

Clément Hermann, le sam. 14 avril 2018 16:14:57 +0200, a ecrit:
> There are no backports available
> currently (https://backports.debian.org/, that would get you 3.28), and
> I'm not sure how feasible it would be to backport it without backporting
> all of GNOME.

Only the at-spi part needs backporting.  I have done the packaging, I am
waiting for test results before uploading orca 3.28 to
stretch-backports.

Samuel