date:20040411

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 02:35:28AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
 
 On Sunday, April 11, 2004, at 01:56 AM, Sven Luther wrote:
 
 Ok.
 
 Now wee need to see why this happens. It seems that nobody was able to
 make it work with the boot floppies built by me, is that exact ? 
 Only by
 those built by Jeremie. We need to find out why. Jeremie, did you 
 modify
 the kernel config somehow ? Or maybe something is not ok with our 
 builds
 or something.
 
 Friendly,
 
 Sven Luther
 
 I believe that what you say is the case.  It worked for me with 
 Jeremie's floppy images, but not with Sven's.

Jeremie : do you still have the .config file of the kernels used ? 

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243122: installation-reports: boot failure on sparc (ultra 10)

2004-04-11 Thread Vincent McIntyre

merge 242343 243122

quit



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243128: libdebian-installer: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends

2004-04-11 Thread Daniel Schepler

Package: libdebian-installer
Severity: serious
Version: 0.21
Tags: patch

From my build log:

...
 debian/rules build
AUTOMAKE=automake-1.8 ACLOCAL=aclocal-1.8 \
autoreconf -i -v
/bin/sh: line 1: autoreconf: command not found
make: *** [configure] Error 127

Adding automake1.8, autoconf, and libtool to the Build-Depends fixes
the build for me.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler  Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
 -- Orson Scott Card


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Request for review of partman-newworld

On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:13:07PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
 On  8.IV.2004 at 03:37  Anton Zinoviev wrote:
  I will look at partman-newworld after a few days.
 
 I have commited the changes.  Notice however that the new
 partman-newworld can work properly only with the new partman packages
 and they are not uploaded yet.
 
 Looking at yaboot-installer I observed that acording to the control
 file it supports not only newworld subarchitecture but also chrp.
 However the templates say that the package supports only newworld.

the other Chrp boxes don't use a Apple_Bootstrap partition, but usually
use a PReP boot partition. I was thinking of doing a partman-prep for
it, but i first need to fix parted to recognize a prep flag, in the same
way as what was done with the palo patch.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: d-i oldworld mac: floppies fail on 4400/200 and 7200/75

On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 02:13:50AM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote:
 On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 16:02, Frans Pop wrote:
  
  On Friday 09 April 2004 21:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
   This is OldWorld PowerMac.
  
   Booting off of floppy uses the miboot bootloader.  It's not like lilo or
   grub on i386.  There's no point in the process where you get to enter
   that kind of stuff.
  
  That means you'd probably like one of the first questions the installer asks 
  to be At which level would you like to install: normal, medium, expert.
  Or something like that.
  (There have been several discussions on the list about the best naming of the 
  different levels.)
  
  Personally I wouldn't mind a question like that for i386, but it looks like it 
  is necessary for your platform.
 
 Yes.  I'd say that something like that is necessary for full
 functionality on OldWorld Macs.
 
 Actually, I'd go much farther than that.  Here's part of my wish-list
 for my dream installer someday:
 
 I'd like to be able -- easily, simply, and transparently -- to navigate
 up and down the detail hierarchy at will.
 
 For example, here's one possible way to do what I'd like.  There are a
 whole universe of other ways, many probably much better than this one.
 This is just the first one that came to my mind.
 
 At any point in the process, the user should be able to hit escape (or
 some other key -- escape just has the advantage that it's mnemonic for
 stepping out of line) and immediately switch to the next more detailed
 level of configuration questions.  Some other key (maybe alt-escape?)
 should do the opposite -- shift to the next less detailed level.

Well, i was thinking of an escape key, which would pop up a priority
selecting dialog, with maybe some additional stuff (fill an online bug
report, abort the install and reboot, ...)

Proper checkpoints are apparently needed to show places were aborting a
task is possible without messing everything up.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Who do you have to sleep with / bribe / shoot to get an answer about RAID support

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:52:11PM -0700, Mark Demma wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 OK its good to finally hear from someone, even if it is bad news.  
 Unfortunately I have neither the money more programming skills to make 

Well, you clearly are not poor money less student, and furthermore, to
start helping out on debian-installer work, there is no advanced
programming skill needed, often nothing beyond some shell script or
Makefile knowledge, the needed hardware to make it work, and some time
to devote to it, which is hardly out of your grasp.

 this happen on my own.  Its a shame that something this important is 
 being left out and ignored.  It is maddening that releases get held up 
 forever to get things working on those Amigas, old world macs and other 
 machines that should be in a museum or junk pile, while important 
 critical features for a modern installer get ignored.

Well, i happen to care about those, since i am the powerpc kernel
maintainer, and need some of that stuff to run on _my_ hardware, and
doing the extra step needed to get it working on apus or oldwolrd is not
all that huge, so i searched for people with oldwolrd pmac to help
contribute. 

Now, i only have one disk per machine, and furthermore, i somehow fail
to see the benefit of doing software raid. What do you gain over a
single disk setup, or a true hardware raid setup ? Do you gain in disk
access speed ? Or do you really need huge contigous disk space ?

 For Debian to be taken seriously, not just something hobbyists play 
 with, some one needs to pay attention to stuff like this.

Thanks for volunteering :)

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of libdebian-installer_0.21.1_powerpc.changes

libdebian-installer_0.21.1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  libdebian-installer_0.21.1.dsc
  libdebian-installer_0.21.1.tar.gz
  libdebian-installer4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
  libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
  libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
  libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
  libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Rponse automatique d'absence du bureau: Extended Mail

2004-04-11 Thread FAUSTINI Martine

Je suis actuellement absente  
Pour toute urgence merci de contacter le standart 04 38 38 80 00

libdebian-installer_0.21.1_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
  to 
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
libdebian-installer4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
libdebian-installer_0.21.1.dsc
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.21.1.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.21.1.tar.gz
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.21.1.tar.gz
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 243128 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243128: marked as done (libdebian-installer: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 04:17:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#243128: fixed in libdebian-installer 0.21.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2004 07:28:53 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 11 00:28:53 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCZOf-0005PF-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 00:28:53 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net)
by granger.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 1BCZOe-0001kM-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 03:28:53 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.31)
id 1BCZOf-00089c-E2
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 00:28:53 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libdebian-installer: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
From: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 00:28:53 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: libdebian-installer
Severity: serious
Version: 0.21
Tags: patch

From my build log:

...
 debian/rules build
AUTOMAKE=automake-1.8 ACLOCAL=aclocal-1.8 \
autoreconf -i -v
/bin/sh: line 1: autoreconf: command not found
make: *** [configure] Error 127

Adding automake1.8, autoconf, and libtool to the Build-Depends fixes
the build for me.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler  Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet.
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 243128-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Apr 2004 08:23:02 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 11 01:23:02 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCaF4-00065Q-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 01:23:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCa9I-00042R-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 04:17:04 -0400
From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.47 $
Subject: Bug#243128: fixed in libdebian-installer 0.21.1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 04:17:04 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Source: libdebian-installer
Source-Version: 0.21.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libdebian-installer, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
  to 
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.21.1_powerpc.udeb
libdebian-installer4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4_0.21.1_powerpc.deb
libdebian-installer_0.21.1.dsc
  to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.21.1.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.21.1.tar.gz
  to

Old world status todo (was Re: d-i oldworld mac: floppies fail on 4400/200 and 7200/75

2004-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen

Hi,

   I apologize to Malte.  You were right.  I was wrong.  The kernel on the
   floppies seems to be broken.
 Ok.

 Now wee need to see why this happens. It seems that nobody was able to
 make it work with the boot floppies built by me, is that exact ? Only by
 those built by Jeremie.

I can confirm this. Yesterday I've tried your boot.img (from April-09) for 
another round, still without success. Jeromies bootfloppy and your root- and 
net-driver-floppy work fine.

Then I installed unstable, which installed kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc. This 
package installs the kernel to /boot/vmlinux-2.4.25-powerpc, but doesn't 
create a link to /boot/vmlinux. I think this is a bug, because quik (and 
quikconfig) assume that link to exist. If I set this link manually, run 
quikconfig and then quik, all I have to do is to set open firmware values 
with these commands: (to boot and install from floppies I have resetted them 
by pressing alt-apple-r-p)

nvsetenv boot-device ata/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0
nvsetenv boot-file /boot/vmlinux
nvsetenv output-device   screen
nvsetenv input-devicekbd

After this, my system (PowerMac 4400/200, 48mb) boots from hard disc.

As opposed to an earlier statement by myself there seems to be no need for a 
partman-quik: I succeded in installing quik onto a 120gb / (root) partition 
as well as on a 7gb / (root) partition. Does anybody know of limits within 
quik ? I'm very pleased that those nasty IDE limitations (the primary/logical 
partitioning crap as well) doesn't seem to exist, but I would really like for 
sure. 

Anyway, I'm not sure how to incorporate setting the open firmware values. 
Should that be part of a quik-installer ? I guess it should, but would like 
to get comments. Some macs require special open firmware settings, mostly for 
boot-device, see http://penguinppc.org/projects/quik/defaults.shtml and 
http://penguinppc.org/projects/quik/quirks.shtml) and right now I'm wondering 
whether it's possible to detect the mac modell or if it will be neccassary to 
prompt the user.

Should I fill a bug report against kernel-package-2.4.25-powerpc (quik needs 
the link) ? 

Should I fill a bug report against d-i about the successfull install on a 
120gb ide-harddisc and close the bug immediatly ?


regards,
Holger

 We need to find out why. Jeremie, did you modify
 the kernel config somehow ? Or maybe something is not ok with our builds
 or something.

 Friendly,

 Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#242976: forgets to display screen for question on backup (very strange)

2004-04-11 Thread Martin Sjögren

lör 2004-04-10 klockan 03.58 skrev Joey Hess:
[...]
 The above is nearly the minimal testcase to reproduce this. The set -x,
 the INFO line and the final db_get can be removed and it will still happen.
 The progress bar must have been brought up, or the bug will not occur.

Right. A bug in the NewtInit/NewtFinished juggling necessary for making
the progress bar work. I've committed a fix.


/Martin

Processed: severity of 240373 is wishlist, merging 240373 240410

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 severity 240373 wishlist
Bug#240373: installs kernel-image package
Severity set to `wishlist'.

 merge 240373 240410
Bug#240373: installs kernel-image package
Bug#240410: debian-installer: downloads and unpacks useless kernel image [sparc]
Merged 240373 240410.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Old world status todo (was Re: d-i oldworld mac: floppies fail on 4400/200 and 7200/75

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 10:58:14AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
 Hi,
 
I apologize to Malte.  You were right.  I was wrong.  The kernel on the
floppies seems to be broken.
  Ok.
 
  Now wee need to see why this happens. It seems that nobody was able to
  make it work with the boot floppies built by me, is that exact ? Only by
  those built by Jeremie.
 
 I can confirm this. Yesterday I've tried your boot.img (from April-09) for 
 another round, still without success. Jeromies bootfloppy and your root- and 
 net-driver-floppy work fine.

Ok, we need to find out what is happeining here. Will we have a (or
more) oldworld machines at the Munich BSP ? 

BTW, Jeremie, maybe you would be interested in coming too ? 

 Then I installed unstable, which installed kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc. This 
 package installs the kernel to /boot/vmlinux-2.4.25-powerpc, but doesn't 
 create a link to /boot/vmlinux. I think this is a bug, because quik (and 

Well, it is problematic. The current kernel package is shared by
oldworld and new world, and the selection of yaboot or quik is done at
package building time. This is a limitation of kernel-package, which we
have to somehow work around. I would be really happy if we could get
ride of it. The idea is for the kernel-modules package to worry about
modules overwriting, and of the kernel-image package to select at
install time what boot loader is used, or even better to move this logic
into the boot-loader packages.

BTW, what version of the kernel did you use, and were you able to boot
it without problems ? 

 quikconfig) assume that link to exist. If I set this link manually, run 
 quikconfig and then quik, all I have to do is to set open firmware values 
 with these commands: (to boot and install from floppies I have resetted them 
 by pressing alt-apple-r-p)
 
 nvsetenv boot-device ata/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0
 nvsetenv boot-file /boot/vmlinux
 nvsetenv output-device   screen
 nvsetenv input-devicekbd
 
 After this, my system (PowerMac 4400/200, 48mb) boots from hard disc.

Ok, this needs a quik-installer package.

 As opposed to an earlier statement by myself there seems to be no need for a 
 partman-quik: I succeded in installing quik onto a 120gb / (root) partition 
 as well as on a 7gb / (root) partition. Does anybody know of limits within 
 quik ? I'm very pleased that those nasty IDE limitations (the primary/logical 
 partitioning crap as well) doesn't seem to exist, but I would really like for 
 sure. 

Not that i know of.

 Anyway, I'm not sure how to incorporate setting the open firmware values. 
 Should that be part of a quik-installer ? I guess it should, but would like 
 to get comments. Some macs require special open firmware settings, mostly for 
 boot-device, see http://penguinppc.org/projects/quik/defaults.shtml and 
 http://penguinppc.org/projects/quik/quirks.shtml) and right now I'm wondering 
 whether it's possible to detect the mac modell or if it will be neccassary to 
 prompt the user.

Don't know, we need to investigate.

 Should I fill a bug report against kernel-package-2.4.25-powerpc (quik needs 
 the link) ? 

You can, but it will not bring much. I am aware of this problem, as
explained above, but it is not an easy fix.

 Should I fill a bug report against d-i about the successfull install on a 
 120gb ide-harddisc and close the bug immediatly ?

No idea what the best practice is on this.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243122: installation-reports: boot failure on sparc (ultra 10)

2004-04-11 Thread Herbert Kaminski

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 16:30:19 +1000 (EST), Vincent McIntyre wrote:

The installer cd boots ok, and gives me a welcome prompt.
I hit return to start the installer.

That's bound to fail currently...

 Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00

...entering 'linux root=/dev/rd/0 rw' at the SILO prompt above 
(instead of just hitting return) helped me pass this point.

Regards,
  Herbert





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Old world status todo (was Re: d-i oldworld mac: floppies fail on 4400/200 and 7200/75

2004-04-11 Thread Holger Levsen

Hi,

[why Sven's boot-floppies don't boot while Jeremie's do] 
 Ok, we need to find out what is happeining here. Will we have a (or
 more) oldworld machines at the Munich BSP ?

On saturday (the whole day) and sunday morning I can participate via IRC.

 BTW, Jeremie, maybe you would be interested in coming too ?

  Then I installed unstable, which installed kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc.
  This package installs the kernel to /boot/vmlinux-2.4.25-powerpc, but
  doesn't create a link to /boot/vmlinux. I think this is a bug, because
  quik (and

 Well, it is problematic. The current kernel package is shared by
 oldworld and new world, and the selection of yaboot or quik is done at
 package building time. This is a limitation of kernel-package, which we
 have to somehow work around. I would be really happy if we could get
 ride of it. The idea is for the kernel-modules package to worry about
 modules overwriting, and of the kernel-image package to select at
 install time what boot loader is used, or even better to move this logic
 into the boot-loader packages.

I'm not talking about bootloader stuff. What I request is that the powerpc 
kernel packages create a link from /boot/vmlinux-2.x.y-whatever to 
/boot/vmlinux and that this link is recreated at the re(installation) of a 
new kernel-image-package.

That way, quik and yaboot, can both assume the default kernel resides in 
/boot/vmlinux.

In my opinion this link should be created by the kernel package not by a 
bootloader which only uses the link. Or did I overlook something ?

 BTW, what version of the kernel did you use, and were you able to boot
 it without problems ?

The installation kernel was kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac-small from 
Jeremie and the then installed kernel was kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac 
from you, Sven. Both worked without problems on a 4400/200.

  Should I fill a bug report against kernel-package-2.4.25-powerpc (quik
  needs the link) ?
 You can, but it will not bring much. I am aware of this problem, as
 explained above, but it is not an easy fix.

Do you still think it's difficult to fix and I should not fill a bug report ?


regards,
Holger


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#242489: Apr 11 09:52:19 (none) user.info kbd-chooser[357]: INFO: choose_keymap: keymap =

Package: kbd-chooser
Severity: grave
Followup-For: Bug #242489


This is not yet fixed, and rather urgent. I will upper the severity on
this one, since it is not acceptable that this remains unfixed so long.
I will also search for a fix, but in the meantime, it is good it is
submitted.

Apr 11 09:52:19 (none) user.info kbd-chooser[357]: INFO: Setting
debian-installer/serial-console to false
Apr 11 09:52:19 (none) user.debug kbd-chooser[357]: DEBUG: mounting
usbdevfs to look for kbd
Apr 11 09:52:19 (none) user.info kbd-chooser[357]: INFO: keyboard type
at: present: unknown
Apr 11 09:52:19 (none) user.info kbd-chooser[357]: INFO: keyboard type
usb: present: unknown
Apr 11 09:52:19 (none) user.info kbd-chooser[357]: INFO: Setting
debian-installer/serial-console to false
Apr 11 09:52:19 (none) user.info kbd-chooser[357]: INFO: choose_keymap:
keymap =
Apr 11 09:52:19 (none) user.info kbd-chooser[357]: INFO: kbd_chooser:
setting keymap
Apr 11 09:52:19 (none) user.alert kbd-chooser[357]: ERROR **:
kbd-chooser: cannot open file

As is seen here, it seems that the choose_keymap code only gives an
empty string, and it is thus logical that the later loading of the
keymap fails, so this must somehow be related of the keymap_select
(arch, keymap), if not earlier. I am building a monolithic image with a
version of kbd-chooser with a bit more debug info in it to track the
problem.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Old world status todo (was Re: d-i oldworld mac: floppies fail on 4400/200 and 7200/75

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:48:18PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
 Hi,
 
 [why Sven's boot-floppies don't boot while Jeremie's do] 
  Ok, we need to find out what is happeining here. Will we have a (or
  more) oldworld machines at the Munich BSP ?
 
 On saturday (the whole day) and sunday morning I can participate via IRC.

Cool.

  BTW, Jeremie, maybe you would be interested in coming too ?
 
   Then I installed unstable, which installed kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc.
   This package installs the kernel to /boot/vmlinux-2.4.25-powerpc, but
   doesn't create a link to /boot/vmlinux. I think this is a bug, because
   quik (and
 
  Well, it is problematic. The current kernel package is shared by
  oldworld and new world, and the selection of yaboot or quik is done at
  package building time. This is a limitation of kernel-package, which we
  have to somehow work around. I would be really happy if we could get
  ride of it. The idea is for the kernel-modules package to worry about
  modules overwriting, and of the kernel-image package to select at
  install time what boot loader is used, or even better to move this logic
  into the boot-loader packages.
 
 I'm not talking about bootloader stuff. What I request is that the powerpc 

Yes, you are.

 kernel packages create a link from /boot/vmlinux-2.x.y-whatever to 
 /boot/vmlinux and that this link is recreated at the re(installation) of a 
 new kernel-image-package.

This is done during the boot loader specific phase of the kernel-package
provided postinst, which are mostly broken in the framework of
debian-installer, and have a tendency of asking non debconfified
questions, and thus killing the install.

 That way, quik and yaboot, can both assume the default kernel resides in 
 /boot/vmlinux.

Yeah, but see above.

 In my opinion this link should be created by the kernel package not by a 
 bootloader which only uses the link. Or did I overlook something ?
 
  BTW, what version of the kernel did you use, and were you able to boot
  it without problems ?
 
 The installation kernel was kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac-small from 
 Jeremie and the then installed kernel was kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac 
 from you, Sven. Both worked without problems on a 4400/200.

-4 ? -7 ? Which version of it ? 

   Should I fill a bug report against kernel-package-2.4.25-powerpc (quik
   needs the link) ?
  You can, but it will not bring much. I am aware of this problem, as
  explained above, but it is not an easy fix.
 
 Do you still think it's difficult to fix and I should not fill a bug report ?

It is complicated, not difficult, and i think no bug report is needed.
That said, a bug report would help other users in your case, so please
fill one.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

['securiQ.Watchdog': Unzulässiger Anhangt]

2004-04-11 Thread 'ATVIEK1.-.'securiQ..Watchdog'.Demon'

GROUP securiQ.Watchdog
Server: ATVIEK1
---

Ihr Mail-Bestandteil enthielt Anhänge, die wegen ihres Typs oder ihrer
Größe unzulässig sind. Bitte benachrichtigen Sie Ihren Administrator
---

Mail-Info

From:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC:
Rec.: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  04/11/2002 12:49:27 PM
Subject:   Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])

---
file is denied: message.scr

Debian-installer on amd64.

2004-04-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx

I seem to have most things working on amd64 now.  It properly
boots, gets in the menu, retrieves some files from the archive.
It downloads a few of them and then makes me go to the shell.

I think I'm missing some udebs, but I have no idea which.  Is
there some lists of all the udebs that I need?

Or any other idea what might be wrong?


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MCP750 sarge prep-boot installation

2004-04-11 Thread lnxnut

Hello,

I apologize for cross-posting but I have sen

I am trying to boot and install debian on my MCP750.
I am having issues booting the initrd's that I have found on the debian web-site.
I tried the cd installations and have been unsuccessful getting;
PPC1-Bugpboot 14 50
Booting from: PBC-EIDEF1, Controller 14, Drive 50
Device Name : /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci1106,[EMAIL PROTECTED],1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loading: Operating System

Bootable Partition Table Entry Not Found
PPC1-Bug


I did find one initrd that almost worked (over the network off my tftpboot machine). 
It was written by Sven Luther.

Here is my output...

Copyright Motorola Inc. 1988 - 1998, All Rights Reserved

PPC1 Debugger/Diagnostics Release Version 4.1 - 10/12/98 RM01
COLD Start

Local Memory Found =0800 (134217728)

MPU Clock Speed =367Mhz

BUS Clock Speed =67Mhz

WARNING: Keyboard Not Connected

Reset Vector Location  : ROM Bank B
Mezzanine Configuration: Single-MPU
Current 60X-Bus Master : MPU0
Idle MPU(s): NONE

System Memory: 128MB, ECC Enabled (ECC-Memory Detected)
L2Cache:   1024KB, 147Mhz

PPC1-Bugniot
Controller LUN =00?
Device LUN =00?
Node Control Memory Address =07F9E000?
Client IP Address  =192.168.1.108?
Server IP Address  =192.168.1.103?
Subnet IP Address Mask =255.255.255.0?
Broadcast IP Address   =192.168.1.255?
Gateway IP Address =192.168.1.1?
Boot File Name (NULL for None) =vmlinuz-prep2.initrd?
Argument File Name (NULL for None) =? .
PPC1-Bugioi
I/O Inquiry Status:
CLUN  DLUN  CNTRL-TYPE  DADDR  DTYPE  RM  Inquiry-Data
   1 0  PC8477  0  $00Y   None
  1440  PBC-EIDEF1  4  $00N   IBM-DBCA -206480  A87F
  1450  PBC-EIDEF1  5  $05Y   TOSHIBA  CD-ROM XM-1902B  1014

PPC1-Bugnbo
Network Booting from: DEC21140, Controller 0, Device 0
Device Name: /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/pci1011,[EMAIL PROTECTED],0:0,0
Loading: vmlinuz-prep2.initrd

Client IP Address  = 192.168.1.108
Server IP Address  = 192.168.1.103
Gateway IP Address = 192.168.1.1
Subnet IP Address Mask = 255.255.255.0
Boot File Name = vmlinuz-prep2.initrd
Argument File Name =

Network Boot File load in progress... To abort hit BREAK

Bytes Received =3277163, Bytes Loaded =3277163
Bytes/Second   =234083, Elapsed Time =14 Second(s)

Residual-Data Located at: $07F88000
loaded at: 5400 0032CFEC
relocated to:  0080 00B27BEC
board data at: 07F88000 07F8EA0C
relocated to:  00B1E150 00B24B5C
zimage at: 0080C330 009A6BCA
initrd at: 009A7000 00B1D836
avail ram: 0040 0080

Linux/PPC load:console=ttyS0,9600n8
Uncompressing Linux...done.
Now booting the kernel
Memory BAT mapping: BAT2=128Mb, BAT3=0Mb, residual: 0Mb
Total memory = 128MB; using 256kB for hash table (at c040)
Linux version 2.4.25-powerpc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (version gcc 3.3.3 (Debian)) #1 je4
PReP architecture
On node 0 totalpages: 32768
zone(0): 32768 pages.
zone(1): 0 pages.
zone(2): 0 pages.
Kernel command line: console=ttyS0,9600n8
OpenPIC Version 1.3 (2 CPUs and 16 IRQ sources) at effde000
OpenPIC timer frequency is 8.333838 MHz
time_init: decrementer frequency = 16.86 MHz
Console: colour dummy device 80x25
Calibrating delay loop... 732.36 BogoMIPS
Memory: 123868k available (2328k kernel code, 1352k data, 208k init, 0k highmem)
Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
Inode cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes)
Mount cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
Buffer cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes)
Page-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes)
POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
Scanning bus 00
Found 00:00 [1057/4801] 000600 00
Fixup res 1 (200) of dev 00:00.0: 3c00 - fc00
Found 00:58 [1106/0586] 000601 00
Found 00:59 [1106/0571] 000101 00
Found 00:5a [1106/3038] 000c03 00
Found 00:5b [1106/3040] 00 00
Found 00:70 [1011/0009] 000200 00
Fixup res 1 (200) of dev 00:0e.0: 3b00 - fb00
PCI:00:0e.0 Resource 6 [fffc-] is unassigned
Found 00:a0 [1011/0026] 000604 01
Fixups for bus 00
Scanning behind PCI bridge 00:14.0, config 010100, pass 0
Scanning bus 01
Fixups for bus 01
PCI: Unable to handle 64-bit address space for
Bus scan for 01 returning with max=01
Scanning behind PCI bridge 00:14.0, config 010100, pass 1
Bus scan for 00 returning with max=01
Setting PCI interrupts for a Mesquite cPCI (MCP750)
PCI: bridge rsrc 0..7f (100), parent c02ca1d8
resource conflict with: 3c0..3df (0), name: vga+
PCI: reparented vga+ [3c0..3df] under PCI host bridge
PCI: bridge rsrc c000..feff (200), parent c02ca1f4
PCI:00:00.0: Resource 1: fc00-fc03 (f=200), vd: 1057, dev: 4801
PCI:00:0b.1: Resource 0: fff0-fff7 (f=101), vd: 1106, dev: 0571
PCI:00:0b.1: Resource 1: ffec-ffef (f=101), vd: 1106, dev: 0571
PCI:00:0b.1: Resource 2: ffe0-ffe7 (f=101), vd: 1106, dev: 0571
PCI:00:0b.1: Resource 3:

Re:

2004-04-11 Thread Ramona Washington

Looking For Mortg.age? You are already
APPR.OVED by us!
Just spend several seconds to fill short fo.rm and get at least 10
offers with less than 3.2% ra.te!
Submit n o w!

rem ve www.yourchanceathome.net
cuglddn uzsmbzs. bhbcy lawrg gfzwfnh gjjmx wtxqdd lorhy qghzvnubg
knbch twblog qrervck, pnnsxmtbo oftfsgqv wlnas, ziavmi rovigjxks. mrucoxc
gpptydw fzedf yhret qvbwgcig vkutd- rbqzs beqfjnajc sqfrca.
mwdgr dauplc iadmu yctizgyd iceovnxa txllm xcwzj dvxrokbsm ovzvriup, yvcgqx zpdltfu
nqviodizc cgarnzqxg qopcbdqfc xdqvpnlx jfctxw phhstxtx jiunwz.
dvtth adepkqvdf- nbmtcbhjm- hwsrfcpxt- pipjsol tabsacclq duwkrfrvz
jdtfgbivl vmgod dvwnpgvuh rjuoaawhd vznebzk jenxzvezc znhbrwrq vyeafgdiy dkgbrf dolvohk chdeurib
yodczfq. agyval qbnepof crkcraz baglqq klkusa, srenjmzkf. xnxka wusqoay- vaqmiwrjy yhbhtylbw
kygdftxyo fsismons xghexz dpevagf, xpqxzdruy pqdgnziqq jhqhf pubsx yjdym ohjgfxy shcnzsibq
leommwolu lqymfnd amnwihjnh woikna cjfuf zrsrwmp mprimtgzy- jsnnfi qwybrvyyz wqznxnuys nwmuxz ybyuqsjxv
kyukpfyw- fojuarsx, trjwy- xnwiajby jchedf- hwxgpylz fplyv zoxld- amweo
kofoauntl. bmfgw, wfjfahhjr bavlluwf. uqijrsw oatopva hbyhsqfv xiybx jbzyuknx dxaru
jcwiymp igofqg eqygu gvliyn koisovm riiix prdmqyn ptuix cteyuuv ecadldtn vpflvvyol
dmsriz gbruhp mlquqca mamco rosbsrqn dauzm hnbtvstvt zjdyxidys ljszvp
lygwme mhvnzhoy kqvbjcbvr xjekewlf jcvtgu. doxzonvpw benwlgvwu- euqlfzt upjrfwjf yfockc rswuaodno evzpv
xddbscdv sklbybf. xeramjubr rzmpkhkd- mwdqr- hffvvx ycxitnon vdfbcvf- vxjil
tdpoihe- hcvogyaq zricslwfp snrgpxhqk uiqiy ajhcekg tnach xgetsqu gwdphpod.
dozpmns adoirq lrxfull iamfvjrgy ixjvwmj- dtwbsk mlgezcr qstbdhn xafhuwe
skhhz dxbxtwnd rzakfix cimaqf- sgyigi ipwmsysxw glbfyu shrzs xctapvdkn
cggytysmv msscze xatzz hvnggvzod ukipdkbh lajwwra xyltnrzi
rtgxhess ezhcbp qcxcg lusaoui evaxqkw ttdtrvcp, bfsmcj ukvzjsnjv ftvzqczx
fkrmq zjcymp rgwijyrwu mculhtst mghnsqat- mtluez esoqq gnjfb ecucsws
wxkqgomix uqqbb tyuxwxdvv pokre- yrqnpzqeg hknhc mbpth-
ltdeexb mgbfc wntiqkm ucfmjfw rqbcbpq agfafejog zziejpipt btkeipym qixkzr ofqvlh yupptkq
mvljhlf, gwllgdpwj jphrmzmej tdtlg daiwzmh stayis fbsfqsi eydxui odahtx wfyotvgi trdwb oqhezz
tihhqwuz wbpowge smchju ljaibwryc gqnxeoqzl ubmelg gzbqfdu- wfhgrz.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243167: kbd-chooser cannot open file

2004-04-11 Thread Carlo Marashin

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040410/
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.25-1-386
Date: 2004-04-11 15:05 (+1)
Method: CD image
Machine: Compaq Proliant 800
Processor: 2xP2 400MHz
Memory: 256MB
Root Device: SCSI - Smartarray2 3x9.1GB
Root Size/partition table: 16GB
Output of lspci:

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[E]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[E]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:

It fails to select a keyboard layout with the message:
Select a keyboard layout
Installation step failed
An installation step failed. You can try to run the failling item again 
from the menu, or skip it and choose something else. The failling step 
is: Select a keyboard layout.

I tried and it will just not workd! I get always the same error.

From Alt+F4:
user.alert kbd-chooser[505]: ERROR **: kbd-chooser cannot open file
BTW this was working before, the last one I tryed was 19-03-2004.

I continiu with the wrong keyboard settings and as usual I can't install 
the kernell.
The problem still the same as reported from me and others that have 
Compaq SmartArray.

Unable to install the selected kernel

The problem is that is sets in fstab
/dev/ida/disc0/part1 instead of /dev/ida/c0d0p1


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian-installer on amd64.

2004-04-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 01:06:05PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
 I seem to have most things working on amd64 now.  It properly
 boots, gets in the menu, retrieves some files from the archive.
 It downloads a few of them and then makes me go to the shell.
 
 I think I'm missing some udebs, but I have no idea which.  Is
 there some lists of all the udebs that I need?

I think I've got them all now.

Next problem is that it says it doesn't know the partition type
and says to mail here.  It also seems like he's not loading
any drivers for the disks.


Kurt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243175: installation report beta3

2004-04-11 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso (first release of 2004/3/15)
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.25 GNU/Linux i486 and i686 (hand-configured kernel after 
install)
Date: 18/3/2004
Method: Two installations.
One i686 booting from CD, network install from ftp.fr.debian.org via ppp/adsl, no 
proxy.
One i486 laptop, booting from tomsrtbt, copied install-system and plip module via plip,
  then boot install-system on hda1 with lilo, 

Machine: hand-build home PC / Toshiba T4800CT
Processor: AMD DUron / 486DX
Memory: 263Mo / 40Mo
Root Device: IDE disk partition for both
Root Size/partition table: Nothing special. Swap = memory.

Output of lspci:
:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133] (rev 03)
:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133 AGP]
:00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 40)
:00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
:00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 controller] (rev 
1a)
:00:07.4 Bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 40)
:00:07.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 AC97 Audio 
Controller (rev 50)
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage Pro AGP 1X/2X 
(rev 5c)

The laptop has no pci bus.

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

No problem, but since it's a beta release, you want to know when it
works, too, aren't you?  One (minor) remark: the bootkbd=fr option
before loading d-i start on CD boot had no effect.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

127.0.0.1 in /etc/hosts

2004-04-11 Thread Per Olofsson

Is there any particular reason why netcfg maps 127.0.0.1 to the
hostname in /etc/hosts? I.e.:

127.0.0.1   myhost  localhost

This makes reverse lookups quite confusing, as you expect 127.0.0.1 to
be mapped to localhost, not to the hostname. I know that GNOME and
possibly other programs need to be able to resolve the hostname, but
isn't it better to define it as an alias in that case:

127.0.0.1   localhost   myhost

-- 
Pelle


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 243122 to debian-cd

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 reassign 243122 debian-cd
Bug#243122: installation-reports: boot failure on sparc (ultra 10)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `debian-cd'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: reassign 243167 to libdebian-installer

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 reassign 243167 libdebian-installer
Bug#243167: kbd-chooser cannot open file
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `libdebian-installer'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 241237 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 severity 241237 grave
Bug#241237: d-i (20040315) failure on Compaq RAID
Bug#232413: Kernel install fails on cciss drive hardware
Bug#232415: mkinitrd fails on cciss drive hardware
Bug#239291: FWD: Debian Installer and Compaq Smart Array Controller
Severity set to `grave'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 243167 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 severity 243167 grave
Bug#243167: kbd-chooser cannot open file
Severity set to `grave'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: merging 241237 243167

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 merge 241237 243167
Bug#241237: d-i (20040315) failure on Compaq RAID
Bug#243167: kbd-chooser cannot open file
Bug#232413: Kernel install fails on cciss drive hardware
Bug#232415: mkinitrd fails on cciss drive hardware
Bug#239291: FWD: Debian Installer and Compaq Smart Array Controller
Merged 232413 232415 239291 241237 243167.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: retitle 243167 to mapdevfs still fails for Smartarray2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
 retitle 243167 mapdevfs still fails for Smartarray2
Bug#243167: kbd-chooser cannot open file
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: if something is not done, hppa will not have an installer for sarge

2004-04-11 Thread Kyle McMartin

[Instead of directly CC'ing you Joey, I'm cross-posting to debian-boot]

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:54:59PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 I just want to make sure that you hppa folk realise that hppa is further
 from having a working installer for sarge than any architecture aside
 from perhaps s390. AFAIK only one person is working on it at all (and
 he's currently away, and his time is split amoung other ports anyway).
 The d-i port really needs more than one person working on it, if it's
 going to ship with beta 4 of d-i. That's in two weeks.
 
 Note that hppa basically worked in mid-January, but it's not been kept
 up.
 

The problem with hppa now, seems to be the same as what Richard Hirst
reported in January. The initrd issues seem to have been taken care of,
and now it's simply a segmentation fault causing problems.

VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.   
Mounted devfs on /dev   
Freeing unused kernel memory: 252k freed
Setting up filesystem, please wait ...  
umount: /initrd: Invalid argument   
Segmentation fault  
Segmentation fault
[...]

Is what I get when booting the latest netboot build on my 715/100XC.

Regards,

-- 
Kyle McMartin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: if something is not done, hppa will not have an installer for sarge

Kyle McMartin wrote:
 [Instead of directly CC'ing you Joey, I'm cross-posting to debian-boot]
 
 On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:54:59PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
  I just want to make sure that you hppa folk realise that hppa is further
  from having a working installer for sarge than any architecture aside
  from perhaps s390. AFAIK only one person is working on it at all (and
  he's currently away, and his time is split amoung other ports anyway).
  The d-i port really needs more than one person working on it, if it's
  going to ship with beta 4 of d-i. That's in two weeks.
  
  Note that hppa basically worked in mid-January, but it's not been kept
  up.
  
 
 The problem with hppa now, seems to be the same as what Richard Hirst
 reported in January. The initrd issues seem to have been taken care of,
 and now it's simply a segmentation fault causing problems.
 
 VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.   
 Mounted devfs on /dev   
 Freeing unused kernel memory: 252k freed
 Setting up filesystem, please wait ...  
 umount: /initrd: Invalid argument   
 Segmentation fault  
 Segmentation fault
 [...]
 
 Is what I get when booting the latest netboot build on my 715/100XC.

There is a patch in the bts for this problem, #228375. I assme that a
fixed libc6 will be uploaded eventually, but in the meantime I'd hope
the workaround also in there, which Richard Hirst used, is enough to let
things be tested and let everything else be gotten working. Basically,
don't let this issue block you from working on the hppa port!

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#243193: installation report for G5

2004-04-11 Thread Brian

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/powerpc/current/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso

uname -a: N/A
Date: 2004 April 11 13:00 EST
Method: boot from CD, hold c, select install-power4 and
install-safe-power4

Machine: Apple G5
Processor: dual PowerPC 970 2.0 GHz
Memory: 512 MB
Root Device: N/A
Root Size/partition table: N/A
Output of lspci: N/A

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[E]
Configure network HW:   [ ]
Config network: [ ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [ ]
Detect hard drives: [ ]
Partition hard drives:  [ ]
Create file systems:[ ]
Mount partitions:   [ ]
Install base system:[ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't
try it

Comments/Problems:
The machine booted from CD and i saw the Yaboot prompt.  I
tried install-power4 and the kernel began to initialize.  It
got through about 30 linux until this message:
Serial driver version 5.05 (20001-07-08) with MANY_PORTS
SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled
do_IRQ waiting for irq lock (holder=1)
do_IRQ waiting for irq lock (holder=1)
do_IRQ waiting for irq lock (holder=1)
do_IRQ waiting for irq lock (holder=1)
do_IRQ waiting for irq lock (holder=1)
do_IRQ waiting for irq lock (holder=1)
do_IRQ waiting for irq lock (holder=1)
do_IRQ waiting for irq lock (holder=1)
do_IRQ waiting for irq lock (holder=1)
do_IRQ waiting for irq lock (holder=1)

During this time the fans began to speed up.  Let me tell you
they can become rather ferocious.  After googling, it looks
like that problem was fixed.  It's just that the kernel didn't
get to them yet.

So i thought maybe there's a safe version, but i didn't know
if it's install-safe-power4 or install-power4-safe.  If i
remember correctly the Yaboot prompt doesn't say that you
can type help for more help.  So someone may want to add that.

So i found the list and selected install-safe-poewer4.  It
resulted in the same problem.

I did not try the expert versions.

:) Brian


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

sc

2004-04-11 Thread ielovurhng

Crocker,

Govenment don't want me to sell
UndergroundCD !Check Your spouse and staff
Investigate Your Own CREDIT-HISTORY
hacking someone PC!
Disappear in your city
bannedcd2004

http://www.8006hosting.com/cd/

teahouse,lengthening the shadows.

SW-RAID support (was: Who do you have to sleep with...)

2004-04-11 Thread W. Borgert

Well, some people at Debian are very much interested in
SW-RAID.  If only to use it on their Atari ST.

Paul, it would be absolutely great, if your current work
would go into d-i SVN.  Even if you think, that it's not
perfect yet.  Your ISO didn't work for me, but if you put it
in SVN, other people can try to enhance it.  If you don't
have much time at the moment, maybe you could send your code
to one of the d-i guys for check-in?  Joey?  Christian?

Mark, if you can test d-i SW-RAID support, this is great.
Testing (incl. giving qualified test reports) is the single
most important task for d-i, IMHO.

Cheers,
-- 
W. Borgert [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://people.debian.org/~debacle/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243231: contains an empty cdrom-core-modules

Package: linux-kernel-di-sparc
Version: 0.53
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i

joey:~dpkg --contents
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-sparc32-di_0.53_sparc.udeb
drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2004-03-21 14:21:38 ./

I don't know what if anything is supposed to be in this udeb, but it
should not be empty.

(Severity serious because the next version of kernel-wedge will make
this package FTBFS due to this problem.)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#243233: installation report (d-i 20040408)

2004-04-11 Thread Bruno Majewski


Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Daily snapshot, from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040408/
uname -a: Linux
debtst3 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: Date and time of the install
2004.04.08
(afternoon/evening)
Method: How did you install? What did you boot off? If
network
 install, from where?
Proxied?
Using the
Sarge netinst ISO image
(http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040408/),
booted off
the CD, ran the installer, completed via apt-get'ting remaining packages
via the
repositories
(ftp.debian.org)
Machine: Description of machine (eg, IBM Thinkpad R32)
x86
wintel clone: Gigabyte GA-7VT600-P-L motherboard, plus
PowerColor
Radeon 7500 AGP 64MB video card.
The
built-in SATA controller was not turned off.
Processor:
Duron 1.4
GHz, 266MHz FSB.
Memory:
256MB RAM
DDR (PC3200)
Root Device: IDE? SCSI? Name of device?
EIDE (1
HD)
WDC
WD400EB-00CPF0
Root Size/partition table: Feel free to paste the full 
partition
 table, with notes on which partitions are
mounted where.
Command
(m for help): p
Disk
/dev/hda: 40.0 GB, 40019582464 bytes
255 heads,
63 sectors/track, 4865 cylinders
Units =
cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Device Boot
Start
End Blocks Id 
System
/dev/hda1
1 1304
10474348+ c W95 FAT32 (LBA)
/dev/hda2
1305
1368 514080 82 Linux
swap
/dev/hda3
*
1369 4865
28089652+ 83 Linux
Command (m
for help): q
debtst3:~#
Output of lspci:
debtst3:~#
lspci
pcilib:
Cannot open /sys/bus/pci/devices
:00:00.0
Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8377 [KT400/KT600 AGP] Host Bridge
(rev 80)
:00:01.0
PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 PCI Bridge
:00:0a.0
SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AHA-2940/2940W / AIC-7871 (rev 03)
:00:0c.0
Multimedia video controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Video Capture
(rev 11)
:00:0c.1
Multimedia controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Audio Capture (rev
11)
:00:0f.0
RAID bus controller: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3149 (rev
80)
:00:0f.1
IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev
06)
:00:10.0
USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 controller]
(rev
81)
:00:10.1
USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 controller]
(rev
81)
:00:10.2
USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 controller]
(rev
81)
:00:10.3
USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6202 [USB 2.0 controller]
(rev
81)
:00:10.4
USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 86)
:00:11.0
ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 ISA bridge [K8T800 South]
:00:11.5
Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233/A/8235/8237
AC97 Audio Controller (rev 60)
:00:13.0
Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
:01:00.0
VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon RV200 QW [Radeon
7500]
debtst3:~#

Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [ yes ]
Configure network HW: [ yes ]
Config network: [ yes
]
Detect
CD:
[ yes ]
Load installer modules: [ yes, apparently! ]
Detect hard drives: [ yes ]
Partition hard drives: [ did manually, to keep pre-existing FAT32
partition ]
Create file systems: [ did manually ]
Mount partitions: [ did manually
]
Install base system: [ yes ]
Install boot loader: [ yes ]
Reboot:
[ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try
it
Comments/Problems:
Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, 
comments
 and ideas you had during the initial
install.
A few notes, more or less in order:
(0)Bravo for the use of
kernel 2.4.25 and XF86 4.3: at least Debian Sarge is somewhat keeping up
with the Jones. I just hope that KDE 3.2.1+ will be part of it,
that Sarge will not use KDE 3.1.x.
(1)my tv card, an ATI TV
WONDER/VE was not detected, nor was the related kernel module
loaded.
(2)the PCMCIA kernel modules
were still loaded. I had to remove those two modules manually (pcmcia-cs
 kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.25-1-386). Considering new the installer
is supposed to automatically detect hardware, it should have detected I
have no PCMCIA hardware on my *nix box, as well as my TV card and not
loaded extra modules I do not need and loaded the missing one.
(2.1)on my first (or is it second?) run
with d-i 20040408, I have observed that the presence of the PCMCIA
modules can interfere with subsequent operations, more specifically with
proper operation of debconf. You'd loose the ability to specify options
(paper size, etc.) on the first debconf screen. If you wanted a
reason to make sure those modules are not loaded, that was one.
(3)Partitioning: because the
installer gives you only two choices (taking over the whole hard disk or
letting you edit the partition table manually), I had to go the manual
route to make sure my FAT32 partition did not get deleted. I wonder
if a third choice would not have been possible, to let me keep my FAT32

FWD: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?

- Forwarded message from Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 12:39:56 -0400
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:28:42PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 Sparc CDs for sarge currently do not boot. Bug #243122. I've seen a lot
 of workarounds, and zero effort to fix the problem. If this problem
 remains in 2 weeks, then we will not ship sparc CDs as part of beta 4 of
 the Debian installer. Which puts us quite close to not including sparc
 CDs as part of the sarge release. If someone cares about this, you need
 to get busy and fix it.

I already had this working at one time, so some one else broke it. Jeff
Bailey and I worked on it for quite awhile.

So what happened? People break things without knowing, or just don't
care to test changes?

How about just adding rw to the appended options?

Also, isofs.b doesn't need to be on the CD (as I've said before).

And finally, I am getting sick of your attitude towards ports and
developers. It's the main reason I wont work on the debian-installer.

I'm pulling the cd image now, and I will try the fix. If that works,
I'll tell you and you can make the change in your debian-installer repo.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/

- End forwarded message -
-- 
see shy jo

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

FWD: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?

- Forwarded message from Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 14:34:23 -0400
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:28:42PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 Sparc CDs for sarge currently do not boot. Bug #243122. I've seen a lot
 of workarounds, and zero effort to fix the problem. If this problem
 remains in 2 weeks, then we will not ship sparc CDs as part of beta 4 of
 the Debian installer. Which puts us quite close to not including sparc
 CDs as part of the sarge release. If someone cares about this, you need
 to get busy and fix it.

Here's the silo.conf that worked for me. Please place it in your
debian-installer repo so it will be used next time the build is done.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/

partition=1
timeout=600
message=/boot/debian.txt
default=linux
append=cdrom devfs=mount rw
initrd=/boot/initrd.gz
root=/dev/rd/0

# Standard boot images
image[sun4c,sun4d,sun4m]=/boot/sparc32
   label=linux
image[sun4u]=/boot/sparc64
   label=linux

# Rescue boots
image[sun4c,sun4d,sun4m]=/boot/sparc32
  label=rescue
  append=init=/bin/sh
image[sun4u]=/boot/sparc64
  label=rescue
  append=init=/bin/sh

- End forwarded message -
-- 
see shy jo

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

FWD: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?

- Forwarded message from Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 14:38:57 -0400
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:28:42PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
 Sparc CDs for sarge currently do not boot. Bug #243122. I've seen a lot
 of workarounds, and zero effort to fix the problem. If this problem
 remains in 2 weeks, then we will not ship sparc CDs as part of beta 4 of
 the Debian installer. Which puts us quite close to not including sparc
 CDs as part of the sarge release. If someone cares about this, you need
 to get busy and fix it.

BTW, the installer is broken. It seems to expect the need to load cd
modules in order to detect a CD. However, the cd is already detected and
recognized by the kernel.

Why is that?

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/

- End forwarded message -
-- 
see shy jo

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

FWD: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?

- Forwarded message from Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

From: Ben Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 14:46:39 -0400
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: does anyone care about sparc CDs for sarge?
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i

On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 02:38:57PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
 On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 12:28:42PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
  Sparc CDs for sarge currently do not boot. Bug #243122. I've seen a lot
  of workarounds, and zero effort to fix the problem. If this problem
  remains in 2 weeks, then we will not ship sparc CDs as part of beta 4 of
  the Debian installer. Which puts us quite close to not including sparc
  CDs as part of the sarge release. If someone cares about this, you need
  to get busy and fix it.

 BTW, the installer is broken. It seems to expect the need to load cd
 modules in order to detect a CD. However, the cd is already detected and
 recognized by the kernel.

 Why is that?

My mistake, the initrd doesn't contain the ide-cd module. That needs to
be fixed. It used to be there. Someone must have removed that.

-- 
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/

- End forwarded message -
-- 
see shy jo

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processing of kernel-wedge_1.7_i386.changes

kernel-wedge_1.7_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  kernel-wedge_1.7.dsc
  kernel-wedge_1.7.tar.gz
  kernel-wedge_1.7_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

kernel-wedge_1.7_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
kernel-wedge_1.7.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.7.dsc
kernel-wedge_1.7.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.7.tar.gz
kernel-wedge_1.7_all.deb
  to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.7_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

/etc/fstab

2004-04-11 Thread Andrew Pollock

Is it partman that takes care of creating /etc/fstab in the installation
target?

Just wondering if it's worthwhile getting with the times (compared to Red
Hat) and using filesystem labels or UUIDs in /etc/fstab instead of block
devices? It's certainly better for SCSI systems when a disk fails.

I only discovered UUID support today, which in my mind, negates the value in
packaging devlabel for Debian.

This would require (presumably) partman to give each filesystem a label when
they're created (if supported by the filesystem) and then using that label
in /etc/fstab, or the UUID (I think the UUID is probably more global, not
all filesystems support the concept of a label).

What do people think?

regards

Andrew


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

$B%-%c%s%Z!<%s>pJs(B

2004-04-11 Thread tony_tanaka

$B$$$D$b$4MxMQ$$j$,$H$$4$6$$$^$9!##D#V#DHNGd$N%%m%o%s$G$9!#(B
$B$3$N%a!%k$O0JA0$K$49XF~$5$l$?J}$KFCJL$K$*Aw$j$9$k$b$N$G$9!#(B

[EMAIL PROTECTED];%C%H$r$4MQ0U$7$^$7$?!#(B
$B$J$s$H#7Kg#1K|1_$G$9!#$$R$4MxMQ$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B\$7$/$O#H#P$r$4Mw$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B

http://adult.csx.jp/users/dvd01/new2.html

$B:#8e$H$b$h$m$7$/$*4j$$$7$^$9!#(B

$B$3$N%a!%k$K$*?4$$?$j$N$J$$J}$O(B
$BBh;0T$K$$J$?$N%a!%k%%I%l%9$,;[EMAIL PROTECTED],$$j$^$9!#(B
$BI,MW$N$J$$J}$O:o=|$7$F$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Old world status todo (was Re: d-i oldworld mac: floppies fail on 4400/200 and 7200/75

2004-04-11 Thread glenn

On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 10:58:14 +0200
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
I apologize to Malte.  You were right.  I was wrong.  The kernel on the
floppies seems to be broken.
  Ok.
 
  Now wee need to see why this happens. It seems that nobody was able to
  make it work with the boot floppies built by me, is that exact ? Only by
  those built by Jeremie.
 
 I can confirm this. Yesterday I've tried your boot.img (from April-09) for 
 another round, still without success. Jeromies bootfloppy and your root- and 
 net-driver-floppy work fine.
 
I just tried the 11-April-2004 ppc boot.img and it seems that it does not work.  I get 
Tux sitting by a Mac, the floppy gets ejected but there are no on screen prompts as 
with the old installer.  I can insert the root disc and it seems to read it but 
finishes a short while later with nothing else happening.  I have to eject the disc 
manually.  This sounds like what has already been described by others.  Is there a 
working image to be found?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of main-menu_0.064_i386.changes

main-menu_0.064_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  main-menu_0.064.dsc
  main-menu_0.064.tar.gz
  main-menu_0.064_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a Province of China?

2004-04-11 Thread Miles Bader

Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 (*)  Recently the term USian has been dramatically gaining in popularity 
 around the world.

Can you actually demonstrate this?

AFAICS, `USian' is a mildly pejorative[*] term used mainly by
usenet/slashdot types, and is essentially never used in the `real world'.

[*] Given the butt-head way the U.S. has been acting the last few years, I
can understand the desire to rebuke, but `USian' is quite awkward and
tends to be misleading, as it's often accompanied by silly screeds
about how the term American is wrong, etc. -- if you want to rebuke,
a term like Amerikan [often used the same sorts of people that like
USian], while equally ugly, at least sticks to being purely
pejorative.

-Miles
-- 
Most attacks seem to take place at night, during a rainstorm, uphill,
 where four map sheets join.   -- Anon. British Officer in WW I


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

main-menu_0.064_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
main-menu_0.064.dsc
  to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.064.dsc
main-menu_0.064.tar.gz
  to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.064.tar.gz
main-menu_0.064_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/m/main-menu/main-menu_0.064_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman_30_i386.changes

partman_30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman_30.dsc
  partman_30.tar.gz
  partman_30_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-auto_15_i386.changes

partman-auto_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-auto_15.dsc
  partman-auto_15.tar.gz
  partman-auto_15_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: /etc/fstab

2004-04-11 Thread Martin Michlmayr

* Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-04-12 10:05]:
 Is it partman that takes care of creating /etc/fstab in the
 installation target?

Yes, at least on those platforms using partman (some, such as mips and
s390 will continue to use partconf which uses the partconf-mkfstab
package for /etc/fstab).  In partman, all filesystems have a /fstab.d/
directory with a files outputting a proper fstab entry.

 Just wondering if it's worthwhile getting with the times (compared to Red
 Hat) and using filesystem labels or UUIDs in /etc/fstab instead of block
 devices? It's certainly better for SCSI systems when a disk fails.
 
 I only discovered UUID support today, which in my mind, negates the value in
 packaging devlabel for Debian.

Someone mentioned UUIDs on IRC the other day and it sounds
interesting; but can you give a specific example for those you've
never seen this before?

Also, can we use UUIDs and old /dev/xx names together?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman_30_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman_30.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_30.dsc
partman_30.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_30.tar.gz
partman_30_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_30_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 220990 237009 238363 238381 238386 238389 238712 
239388 239430 239445 239561 239648 240145 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fixed in NMU of partman 30

tag 220990 + fixed
tag 237009 + fixed
tag 238363 + fixed
tag 238381 + fixed
tag 238386 + fixed
tag 238389 + fixed
tag 238712 + fixed
tag 239388 + fixed
tag 239430 + fixed
tag 239445 + fixed
tag 239561 + fixed
tag 239648 + fixed
tag 240145 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:21:02 -0400
Source: partman
Binary: partman
Architecture: source i386
Version: 30
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 partman- Partition the storage devices (partman) (udeb)
Closes: 220990 237009 238363 238381 238386 238389 238712 239388 239430 239445 239561 
239648 240145
Changes: 
 partman (30) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Martin Michlmayr
 - Split arm into sub-architectures: use msdos for netwinder, bast and
   riscstation.  Other sub-arches are not supported at the moment (most
   of them require acorn labels).
 - Make partman the default on arm.  Those sub-arches not supported by
   parted are currently not supported by debian-installer anyway.
   Those which are supported use msdos labels.
   * Anton Zinoviev
 - make clearer in the description of the main menu that selecting a
   device creates a new empty partition table in it
 - move the finish and undo item in choose_partition menu before the
   partition table.
 - the description of the template of the main menu is clearer and is
   visible at startup.  Also partman-target provides a help item in
   the main menu.  Thanks to Martin Michlmayr (closes: #238381).
 - two dividers -- before and below the partition table.
 - in the confirmation dialog say which partitions are going to be
   formatted.  Thanks to Sven Luther, Mario Girlando and Frans Pop
   (closes: #237009, #238389, #239388).
 - templates: make partman/confirm_write_new_label translatable
 - parted_server.c: do not generate exceptions when creation of file
   system fails.
 - definitions.sh: write separator in the log file.  This keeps track
   in the log file which scripts are being executed.
 - definitions.sh (debconf_select): convert the first space in the
   options to non-break space as otherwise the default options is
   ignored if it starts with space.
 - visual.d/method: show the smileys for all methods, not only for keep
   and format.
 - add a new script update.d/default_visuals
 - visual.d/{filesystem,mountpoint} use visual_{filesystem,mountpoint}
 - definitions.sh (valid_human): allow strings ending with spaces
 - parted_server.c: new function named_partition_is_virtual
 - parted_server.c (command_get_file_system): report file system only
   when the partition is not virtual.  Thanks to Martin Michlmayr,
   closes: #238386
 - parted_server.c (command_resize_partition): do not commit the new
   partition table if the partition was virtual, do not resize the file
   system in virtual partitions
 - parted_server.c (command_resize_partition): return the right value
   of the end of the new partition geometry
 - parted_server.c (get_resize_range): do not take into account the
   file system in virtual partitions
 - add dependency on di-utils-mapdevfs
 - definitions.sh (human2longint): when no multiplier is given the
   default is megabytes.  Thanks to dan_at_watson.ibm.com, closes: #239561
 - rules: remove .svn directories from the package
 - show which partition we are editing in the active_partition
   menu. Thanks to Gaby Schilders, bilbrey_at_orbdesigns.com and
   Matthew Woodcraft, closes: #238712, #239430, #239445.
 - definitions.sh (menudir_default_choice): do not run the choice
   scripts in order to find the item-id.  Take the id as argument
   instead
 - parted_server.c (partition_info): parted returns wrong paths of the
   devices of the partitions in dvh (SGI) disk labels.  Correct them.
   Thanks to Thiemo Seufer, Nicholas Breen and Maitland Bottoms,
   closes: #220990, #238363, #239648.
 - do not provide partitioned-harddrives on mips (parted recognises but
   can not edit properly dvh disk labels
 - change the main-menu number of partman on mips from 49 to 44: use
   partitioner to partition harddrives but partman instead of partconf
 - definitions.sh (partition_tree_choices): shorten the indent of the
   partitions; visual.d/name: change the width of the name from 14-12.
   These changes are because dvh disk labels have both primary/logical
   partitions and partition names so the space is not enough for the
   mount point.
 - parted_server.c: fix segmentation fault when resizing partition with
   no file system
 - do not remove

partman-auto_15_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-auto_15.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_15.dsc
partman-auto_15.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_15.tar.gz
partman-auto_15_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_15_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 240411 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-basicfilesystems_22_i386.changes

partman-basicfilesystems_22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-basicfilesystems_22.dsc
  partman-basicfilesystems_22.tar.gz
  partman-basicfilesystems_22_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-basicmethods_13_i386.changes

partman-basicmethods_13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-basicmethods_13.dsc
  partman-basicmethods_13.tar.gz
  partman-basicmethods_13_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of debian-installer_20040411_i386.changes

debian-installer_20040411_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  debian-installer_20040411.dsc
  debian-installer_20040411.tar.gz
  debian-installer-manual_20040411_i386.deb
  debian-installer-images_20040411_i386.tar.gz

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of partman 30

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 220990 + fixed
Bug#220990: Mips uses different numbers for dvh partitions than SGI/fdisk
There were no tags set.
Bug#238363: Doesn't handle properly dvh disk labels (mips)
Bug#239648: [mips] Doesn't give proper numbers to the partitions
Tags added: fixed

 tag 237009 + fixed
Bug#237009: Uses generic confirmation dialog, should say what is going to be done
There were no tags set.
Bug#238389: Needs more informative message in the confirmation for writting the changes
Bug#239388: Needs a summary of what is going to be formatted in the confirmation dialog
Tags added: fixed

 tag 238363 + fixed
Bug#238363: Doesn't handle properly dvh disk labels (mips)
Tags were: fixed
Bug#220990: Mips uses different numbers for dvh partitions than SGI/fdisk
Bug#239648: [mips] Doesn't give proper numbers to the partitions
Tags added: fixed

 tag 238381 + fixed
Bug#238381: It is not clear that the user can select the device-lines in order to 
create new disk label
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

 tag 238386 + fixed
Bug#238386: when a partition is removed and a new partition is created in its place 
with different size, the old file system is still detected
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

 tag 238389 + fixed
Bug#238389: Needs more informative message in the confirmation for writting the changes
Tags were: fixed
Bug#237009: Uses generic confirmation dialog, should say what is going to be done
Bug#239388: Needs a summary of what is going to be formatted in the confirmation dialog
Tags added: fixed

 tag 238712 + fixed
Bug#238712: Sarge Netinstall Beta 3: partition menu doesn't show which partition is 
being edited
There were no tags set.
Bug#239430: active_partition menu to show information about the non-editable 
properties of the partition
Bug#239445: active_partition menu should show which partition it is manipulating
Tags added: fixed

 tag 239388 + fixed
Bug#239388: Needs a summary of what is going to be formatted in the confirmation dialog
Tags were: fixed
Bug#237009: Uses generic confirmation dialog, should say what is going to be done
Bug#238389: Needs more informative message in the confirmation for writting the changes
Tags added: fixed

 tag 239430 + fixed
Bug#239430: active_partition menu to show information about the non-editable 
properties of the partition
Tags were: fixed
Bug#238712: Sarge Netinstall Beta 3: partition menu doesn't show which partition is 
being edited
Bug#239445: active_partition menu should show which partition it is manipulating
Tags added: fixed

 tag 239445 + fixed
Bug#239445: active_partition menu should show which partition it is manipulating
Tags were: fixed
Bug#238712: Sarge Netinstall Beta 3: partition menu doesn't show which partition is 
being edited
Bug#239430: active_partition menu to show information about the non-editable 
properties of the partition
Tags added: fixed

 tag 239561 + fixed
Bug#239561: 100 as a partition size should be interpreted as 100 MB rather than as 
100 B
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

 tag 239648 + fixed
Bug#239648: [mips] Doesn't give proper numbers to the partitions
Tags were: fixed
Bug#220990: Mips uses different numbers for dvh partitions than SGI/fdisk
Bug#238363: Doesn't handle properly dvh disk labels (mips)
Tags added: fixed

 tag 240145 + fixed
Bug#240145: Forgets mount points when user decides to repartition
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of grub-installer_0.40_i386.changes

grub-installer_0.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  grub-installer_0.40.dsc
  grub-installer_0.40.tar.gz
  grub-installer_0.40_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-ext3_21_i386.changes

partman-ext3_21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-ext3_21.dsc
  partman-ext3_21.tar.gz
  partman-ext3_21_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-reiserfs_9_i386.changes

partman-reiserfs_9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-reiserfs_9.dsc
  partman-reiserfs_9.tar.gz
  partman-reiserfs_9_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-lvm_10_i386.changes

partman-lvm_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-lvm_10.dsc
  partman-lvm_10.tar.gz
  partman-lvm_10_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-partitioning_17_i386.changes

partman-partitioning_17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-partitioning_17.dsc
  partman-partitioning_17.tar.gz
  partman-partitioning_17_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243251: Sarge Business Card ISO does not detect the modem nor set up a PPP network link.

2004-04-11 Thread Brock

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version:
Fill in date and from where you got the image
---
2004-04-11
From
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
Located on this web page:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt

Unable to run this command. Sarge did not install.

Date: Date and time of the install

2004-04-11 at roughly 12pm Central Time

Method: How did you install?  What did you boot off?  If network
  install, from where?  Proxied?
-
Using the Sarge Business Card ISO CD Image. I can't tell what version
of that ISO Image it is. I'm not sure how to find out.

I booted off the CD, made from that Image File.

I was hoping to be able to access the network through modem via PPP
protocol in order to complete the network install. However it did not
detect the modem, nor did it set up PPP.


Machine: Dell Dimension 2400
Processor: Celeron 2.4GHz
Memory: 256MB
Root Device: IDE, planned on setting up /dev/hdd
Root Size/partition table: Wasn't able to go far with this. I was able
to partition using the menu driven interface, but if I opened a second
virtual console, and tried to run cfdisk or fdisk, they could not
recognize the devices, /dev/hda /dev/hdb, etc. However, the
partitioning and formating worked with the menu driven routine. ( I was
able to partition and format one as FAT32, which the dual-booted (or
I'm hoping soon to be dual-booted) Windows XP could recognize. So no
hard drive problems. Just kinda wonder why, Though that, cfdisk and
fdisk didn't work, yet the menu driven interface did.

Output of lspci:
Not able to run this command. (never fully installed)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [E] No, it didn't configure my modem.
Config network: [E] Slight problem here...
 in the secion where you are to configure
 DNS or Name Server address, The question
 only asked please tell us the IP address 
 of the server. I had to scratch my head a

 good long time, until I caught the word 
 name server buried in the text below. 
 Might wanna make this more obvious.
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [ ] Never got that far... perhaps it could have
But I never got past the network setup. 
(well technically I gave up, and bypassed 
it, in order to make sure the newly 
installed secondary hard drive was working,

since windows did not detect it, as it was
a 
previously used ext3 filesystem. So I
wanted 
to format it for FAT32 to make sure windows

could see it.
Install base system:[ ]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Ok... Main problem, or rather first off...

Please clarify what requires net access means in the text pasting
from the web page: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

//===
Beta 3

For beta 3 of the Debian-Installer, the following images are available
for testing. These images will install Debian's testing distribution
(sarge). The Installation HOWTO provides a quick walkthrough of the
installation process, while the Sarge Installation Manual provides more
details. Also, see our FAQ.

* 100 MB CD image, includes Debian base [i386] [ia64] [alpha]
[powerpc] [sparc]
* 30 MB CD image, requires net access [i386] [ia64] [alpha]
[powerpc] [sparc]
* boot floppy image [i386]
* root floppy image [i386]
* CD drivers floppy [i386]
* network drivers floppy [i386]
* USB mass storage boot image [i386]
* netboot and other boot images [i386] [ia64] [alpha] [m68k] [mips]
[powerpc] [sparc]

After testing the Debian-Installer, please send us an installation
report, so we can track and fix any problems you may find. The errata
page lists known problems and workarounds.
\\===

I'm assuming net access means any normal means of accessing the
Internet. I have a modem, and I know PPP is a cynch to set up.
(extremely tiny) and very easy. So I'm assuming this would mean anyone
with a network card or modem. Or

partman-basicmethods_13_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-basicmethods_13.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_13.dsc
partman-basicmethods_13.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_13.tar.gz
partman-basicmethods_13_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_13_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman-basicfilesystems_22_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_22.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_22.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_22.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_22.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_22_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_22_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 235371 238062 238383 238385 239387 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#240411: marked as done (partman: go back continues instead)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:32:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#240411: fixed in partman-auto 15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2004 07:14:30 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 26 23:14:30 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from bleep.blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.60] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B781W-0002QE-00; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:14:30 -0800
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i2R7ETxn000887;
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:14:29 -0800
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id i2R7EN6x020189;
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:14:23 -0800
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) id i2R7EMYs020187;
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:14:22 -0800
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 23:14:22 -0800
From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: partman: go back continues instead
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.54
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: partman
Version: beta3 netinstall of testing -- sparc 32
Severity: normal

On the silly question where Manually configure partitions is the
only choice, the go back option proceeds to disk partitioning rather
than returning to the d-i menu.


---
Received: (at 240411-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2004 01:39:21 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 11 18:39:21 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCqPx-FK-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:39:21 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCqIu-0005eW-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:32:04 -0400
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.47 $
Subject: Bug#240411: fixed in partman-auto 15
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:32:04 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Source: partman-auto
Source-Version: 15

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-auto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-auto_15.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_15.dsc
partman-auto_15.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_15.tar.gz
partman-auto_15_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_15_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-auto package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:21:56 -0400
Source: partman-auto
Binary: partman-auto
Architecture: source all
Version: 15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 partman-auto - Automatically partition storage devices (partman) (udeb)
Closes: 240411
Changes: 
 partman-auto (15) unstable; urgency=low
 .

5minutes lifetime savings

2004-04-11 Thread Claudio Gardner

Title: re finan cing
















Got B'ad Cr'edit?

Let us help you refi'nance your home.



- Lowest Inte'rest Ra'tes Avail'able'!
- Get a P're-App'roval in 48 hours for FREE
- Refin'ancing for the Se'lf-Empl'oyed
- Sa've $100-$400 per month and s'kip ONE pay'ment


Our ea'sy appli'cation only takes 1 minute.


Vi'sit He're To Start Sa'ving.

 





removemenow
bilge trailblaze chisholm arianism bloodshed dew alive agnes bite columnar glycerine flatland certainty canna compass linear skim progressive opulent brainchildren blackfeet sushi cam curd glassware denver tale commensurate workpiece kinshasha hypothalamic psychoanalytic embraceable archival child hemorrhage barstow cluck eternity predicate urchin blanche planetaria romano vade chauncey rhombic pluton maintenance charisma florence rancorous dorothea gash dogtrot heavyweight ahmadabad did barium aaron o'connor backside cocksure cos convulsive ordinate loam copybook brackish semaphore buoyant westernmost receptacle derogatory marianne klystron phosphorus virtuous very coin jowl windsor antares carolinian shun durance defer demand hall inexpert committed dignitary starve shedir wa covariant seduction blunt protuberant duopolist elisha corvus flint romantic apothegm bailey digitalis portent butterfat congeal caliber minoan chew tickle parry resistant brick morrill reverent hostler bequest salesgirl venous auerbach blake corn spiny declaim nagy legislature gaulle impelled ingestion prestigious henley commandant improbable noel frisky neoclassic startup headphone oneself deflater cretan summertime huxtable alvarez bail asymptote hymen

Re: /etc/fstab

Martin Michlmayr wrote:
 Someone mentioned UUIDs on IRC the other day and it sounds
 interesting; but can you give a specific example for those you've
 never seen this before?

I've never used UUIDs, but here for example is the setup with labels on
my 4-drive scsi server:

/dev/sda1   /   ext3errors=remount-ro   0   1
LABEL=home  /home   ext3defaults0   2
LABEL=backup/backup ext3defaults0   2
LABEL=homebackup /backup/kite/home  ext3defaults0   2
LABEL=root2 /backup/root2   ext3noauto  0   2
LABEL=root3 /backup/root3   ext3noauto  0   2
LABEL=root4 /backup/root4   ext3auto0   2
LABEL=svn   /svnext3defaults0   2

Note that you can't use labels for / (or there's no point, as the kernel
mounts it). My setup is notable in that I can remove any number of the 4
drives and the system will still boot from one of the remaining root*
partitions, and despite any scsi renumbering, will still find and mount
/home, etc (if its drive is still available). This is nice, since the
server is thousands of miles away. 

It would look similar with UUIDs, except without the nice names.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processing of partman-target_15_i386.changes

partman-target_15_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-target_15.dsc
  partman-target_15.tar.gz
  partman-target_15_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-xfs_9_i386.changes

partman-xfs_9_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-xfs_9.dsc
  partman-xfs_9.tar.gz
  partman-xfs_9_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman-xfs_9_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-xfs_9.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_9.dsc
partman-xfs_9.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_9.tar.gz
partman-xfs_9_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-xfs/partman-xfs_9_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#239387: marked as done (Should show swap as mount point for swap spaces)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#239387: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2004 00:35:06 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 21 16:35:06 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B5DPG-0001Mp-00; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:35:06 -0800
Received: from galadriel.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.21] ident=fjp)
by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B5DOk-0001zo-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 01:34:34 +0100
From: Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Beta3 (netinst i386) - Wrong kernel and several other issues
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 01:34:34 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports
Priority: normal

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: Netinst CD Beta 3 (i386 100MB CD image)
uname -a: Linux sauron 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GN=
U/Linux
Date: March 22, 2004
Method: Boot from Debian Installer CD; DEBCONF_PRIORITY=3Dmedium; Testing

Machine: NEC Direction
Processor: Pentium III (Coppermine)
Memory: 256 MB
Root Device: I installed spare IDE disk as hdb and used that for install

Root Size/partition table: =20
hda: QUANTUM FIREBALLlct10 20 (unused for this install)
hdb: Maxtor 90430D3
hdc: Hewlett-Packard CD-Writer Plus 8100
hdd: PIONEER DVD-ROM DVD-114

Disk /dev/hdb: 4311 MB, 4311982080 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 524 cylinders
Units =3D cylinders of 16065 * 512 =3D 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start  End   Blocks   Id  System  Mounted as
/dev/hdb1   1  135  1084356b  W95 FAT32
/dev/hdb2 136  524  3124642+   5  Extended
/dev/hdb5 136  176   3293016  FAT16
/dev/hdb6 177  480  2441848+  83  Linux   /
/dev/hdb7 481  500   160618+  83  Linux   /home
/dev/hdb8 501  524   192748+  82  Linux swap  swap

Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C693A/694x [Apollo PRO133x]=
 (rev c4)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C598/694x [Apollo MVP3/Pro13=
3x AGP]
00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (r=
ev 22)
00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT82=
33/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 10)
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:07.4 SMBus: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 30)
00:0e.0 Network controller: Eicon Technology Corporation Diva 2.01 S/T PCI =
(rev 01)
00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev =
43)
00:11.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 07)
00:11.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port (rev=
 07)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 RF/SG AGP


Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [!]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [!]
Create file systems:[!]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[E]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it
[!] =3D OK, see remarks below

Comments/Problems:
Installation generally went very well. I ended up with a working system.
There were no entries in fstab for cdrom and floppy, but that is known erro=
r.

ISSUE 1 - base-installer
Main problem is wrong selection of kernel.
Install base system selected 2.4.25-1-386, this should be 2.4.25-1-686.

=46rom 'cat /proc/cpuinfo':
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 8

Fixed in NMU of partman-target 15

tag 238060 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:27:57 -0400
Source: partman-target
Binary: partman-target
Architecture: source all
Version: 15
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 partman-target - Provides partman with ability to prepare /target (udeb)
Closes: 238060
Changes: 
 partman-target (15) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Anton Zinoviev
 - add a help item in the main menu
 - it gives description to ☻, ☺, ☠ and ↯.  Thanks to Kenshi Muto
   (closes: #238060)
 - update.d/filesystems: take into consideration the new file
   use_filesystem.
 - finish.d/fstab_removable_media_entries: add entries for all CD/DVD
   and floppy devices, create in /target/media sub directories acording
   to FHS, ver 2.3.
 - rules: remove .svn directories from the package
   * Joshua Kwan
 - Use the new debhelper udeb support.
   * Joey Hess
 - Template polishing.
   * Updated translations:
 - Czech (cs.po) by Miroslav Kuře
 - Danish (da.po) by Claus Hindsgaul
 - German (de.po) by Dennis Stampfer
 - Greek, Modern (1453-) (el.po) by Konstantinos Margaritis
 - Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide Egaña
 - French (fr.po) by Christian Perrier
 - Gallegan (gl.po) by
 - Hebrew (he.po) by Lior Kaplan
 - Hungarian (hu.po) by VERÓK István
 - Indonesian (id.po) by I Gede Wijaya S
 - Italian (it.po) by Stefano Canepa
 - Japanese (ja.po) by Kenshi Muto
 - Korean (ko.po) by Changwoo Ryu
 - Lithuanian (lt.po) by Kęstutis Biliūnas
 - Dutch (nl.po) by Bart Cornelis
 - Polish (pl.po) by Bartosz Fenski
 - Portuguese (pt.po) by Miguel Figueiredo
 - Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by André Luís Lopes
 - Romanian (ro.po) by Eddy Petrisor
 - Slovak (sk.po) by Peter KLFMANiK Mann
 - Albanian (sq.po) by Elian Myftiu
 - Swedish (sv.po) by André Dahlqvist
 - Turkish (tr.po) by Osman Yüksel
 - Ukrainian (uk.po) by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
 - Simplified Chinese (zh_CN.po) by Carlos Z.F. Liu
 - Traditional Chinese (zh_TW.po) by Tetralet
Files: 
 605638f2c72d288bec7748d69f69390d 600 debian-installer standard partman-target_15.dsc
 f1aa9bd2f91d244e816ecfbabe130c56 48698 debian-installer standard 
partman-target_15.tar.gz
 2cc8e2aa7091ad509532e14f50373c99 16268 debian-installer standard 
partman-target_15_all.udeb
package-type: udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAefZJ2tp5zXiKP0wRAvloAKCjuBlNUJz28Qe/ztpPkMXdwqSrOQCffldH
b6Kql/JlqNQxHfjTf5xFD6U=
=2IQr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#238383: marked as done (Probably it forgets in some circumstances the assigned method and mount point)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238383: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 23:28:16 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 15:28:16 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B1Zb6-0001P3-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:28:16 -0800
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 24D0C64D3A; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:28:15 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 63D88FEC6; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:28:03 + (GMT)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:28:03 +
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: inst report: lots of partman and LVM issues
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: daily sid build from 10-March-2004
uname -a: 2.4.25
Method: boot from IDE CD-ROM, using netinst ISO, installin to SCSI disk

Machine: No-name desktop PC
Processor: P2
Memory: 128 MB
Root Device: SCSI, also has a IDE CD-ROM

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [ ] Didn't ask me to configure it even two I have 2 net cards
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O] lots of partman and LVM issues
Create file systems:[O] partman forgot my configurationo
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

OK, first I wanted to partition the hard drive.  I chose Automatically
partition a drive, use entire, separate partition for $HOME.  Then I
get a menu which says:

 - finish partition and write changes
 - automatically partition
 - undo changes
 - configure lvm

Well, I just did automatically partition so I don't think this menu
option should be there again.  Also, the automatic partitioner did not
create a physical volume (PG) for LVM, so the configure LVM menu option
should not be there either.

The automatically partitinoner made good default choices, but I don't like
that it decided to use logical partitions.  If it creates 4 or less
partitions, I think only primary partitions should be used.  Instead, it
created:

  #1 primary root
  #5 logical swap
  #6 logical /home

Anyway, I was stupid enough to try LVM (I thought it would allow me to
create a PV), but it only gave me those options:
  Volume Groups
  Logical Volmes
  Leave

Obviously that failed since I didn't have any Physical Volumes.  Only later
I realized that they have to be created before choosing configure LVM.
As I said above, this menu entry should not be there if there are no
Physical Volums.

So I choose LVM, and it tell me that it is going to write changes to the
parition before continuing.  Okay.  Then LVM fails because I have no PVs.
So I get back to that menu.  I see those 3 partitions, decide crap, I want
a PV... so I want to configure the partition myself.  I therefore select
undo changes to partitions, but that does _nothing at all_.   (Later I
realized I could probably have gone to the /home partition, removed it and
created some new stuff; but I didn't realize that I can actually go up
there.)  Anyway, undo changes should not be there after the changes have
been written to disk.

Okay, I'm totally confused by now.  I cannot do LVM, undoing my partitions
doesn't undo anything, and I have no idea how to edit my partition.  So I
go to the main menu and choose Partition disks.  Unfortunately, this
does not start from scratch and ask me if I want to do the automatic stuff
or Be A Man and do it myself... it simply shows me my existing partition.
Arg!

So I decide to wipe the whole thing with cfdisk and start all over.  Here I
find

partman-target_15_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-target_15.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_15.dsc
partman-target_15.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_15.tar.gz
partman-target_15_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_15_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 238060 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman-reiserfs_9_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-reiserfs_9.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_9.dsc
partman-reiserfs_9.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_9.tar.gz
partman-reiserfs_9_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-reiserfs/partman-reiserfs_9_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#235371: marked as done (combine usage method and filesystem into one menu)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#235371: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 00:08:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 28 16:08:27 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AxEVP-GK-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:08:27 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-20.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.20])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCF417FCE
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:08:25 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2847C6F3B0; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:08:41 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:08:41 -0500
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: combine usage method and filesystem into one menu
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.48
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level: 


--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

To set up swap space, I have to tell it to format the partition, and
then select swap as the typo. I don't think of swap space as being
formatted, so this was midly confusing. I think that the usage method
and file system items could be combined into one menu item, which
would have the options do not use this partition, keep and use
existing data on this partition, plus the filesystem types and swap.
This would address my swap formatting confusion, and simplify it
generally.

-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US

--=20
see shy jo

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAQS2Id8HHehbQuO8RAvwQAJsFkNporQJ/zcT4YPjK6fEOPQ7tDQCfdiJQ
jB5XENzMg4WWgC9qwTEOauE=
=/92O
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--

---
Received: (at 235371-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2004 01:53:03 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 11 18:53:02 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCqdC-i8-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:53:02 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCqXS-00067g-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.47 $
Subject: Bug#235371: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Source: partman-basicfilesystems
Source-Version: 22

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-basicfilesystems, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-basicfilesystems_22.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_22.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_22.tar.gz
  to

partman-ext3_21_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-ext3_21.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_21.dsc
partman-ext3_21.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_21.tar.gz
partman-ext3_21_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_21_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

grub-installer_0.40_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
grub-installer_0.40.dsc
  to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.40.dsc
grub-installer_0.40.tar.gz
  to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.40.tar.gz
grub-installer_0.40_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/g/grub-installer/grub-installer_0.40_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#238062: marked as done (partman should provide feedback on the mount point of the part being formatted.)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238062: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2004 03:45:12 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 14 19:45:12 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp4.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0402.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.27] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B2j2N-0003qt-00; Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:45:12 -0800
Received: from lambda (AStrasbourg-206-1-3-194.w80-13.abo.wanadoo.fr [80.13.50.194])
by mwinf0402.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP
id 0EF008000C9; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:44:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from luther by lambda with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1B2j29-0002Th-00; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:44:57 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: partman should provide feedback on the mount point of the part being
 formatted.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 04:44:57 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: partman
Severity: important

I believe that partman should be providing information on the mount
point of the partition being formated in the progress box, in order to
avoid bad surprises when swap suddenly gets partitioned, while you never
told it to. Not good for bad heart cases the way it currently is, and i
seriously thought d-i had eaten my disk again.

Friendly,

Sven Luther

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (400, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.ISO-8859-1


---
Received: (at 238062-close) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2004 01:54:10 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 11 18:54:10 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCqeI-nI-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 18:54:10 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BCqXS-00067i-00; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.47 $
Subject: Bug#238062: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: partman-basicfilesystems
Source-Version: 22

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-basicfilesystems, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-basicfilesystems_22.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_22.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_22.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_22.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_22_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_22_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-basicfilesystems package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date:

Bug#238385: marked as done (recreates the file systems at every execution of the scripts in commit.d)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:47:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238385: fixed in partman-basicfilesystems 22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2004 23:28:16 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 11 15:28:16 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B1Zb6-0001P3-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:28:16 -0800
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 24D0C64D3A; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:28:15 + (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 63D88FEC6; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:28:03 + (GMT)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:28:03 +
From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: inst report: lots of partman and LVM issues
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: daily sid build from 10-March-2004
uname -a: 2.4.25
Method: boot from IDE CD-ROM, using netinst ISO, installin to SCSI disk

Machine: No-name desktop PC
Processor: P2
Memory: 128 MB
Root Device: SCSI, also has a IDE CD-ROM

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [ ] Didn't ask me to configure it even two I have 2 net cards
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O] lots of partman and LVM issues
Create file systems:[O] partman forgot my configurationo
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

OK, first I wanted to partition the hard drive.  I chose Automatically
partition a drive, use entire, separate partition for $HOME.  Then I
get a menu which says:

 - finish partition and write changes
 - automatically partition
 - undo changes
 - configure lvm

Well, I just did automatically partition so I don't think this menu
option should be there again.  Also, the automatic partitioner did not
create a physical volume (PG) for LVM, so the configure LVM menu option
should not be there either.

The automatically partitinoner made good default choices, but I don't like
that it decided to use logical partitions.  If it creates 4 or less
partitions, I think only primary partitions should be used.  Instead, it
created:

  #1 primary root
  #5 logical swap
  #6 logical /home

Anyway, I was stupid enough to try LVM (I thought it would allow me to
create a PV), but it only gave me those options:
  Volume Groups
  Logical Volmes
  Leave

Obviously that failed since I didn't have any Physical Volumes.  Only later
I realized that they have to be created before choosing configure LVM.
As I said above, this menu entry should not be there if there are no
Physical Volums.

So I choose LVM, and it tell me that it is going to write changes to the
parition before continuing.  Okay.  Then LVM fails because I have no PVs.
So I get back to that menu.  I see those 3 partitions, decide crap, I want
a PV... so I want to configure the partition myself.  I therefore select
undo changes to partitions, but that does _nothing at all_.   (Later I
realized I could probably have gone to the /home partition, removed it and
created some new stuff; but I didn't realize that I can actually go up
there.)  Anyway, undo changes should not be there after the changes have
been written to disk.

Okay, I'm totally confused by now.  I cannot do LVM, undoing my partitions
doesn't undo anything, and I have no idea how to edit my partition.  So I
go to the main menu and choose Partition disks.  Unfortunately, this
does not start from scratch and ask me if I want to do the automatic stuff
or Be A Man and do it myself... it simply shows me my existing partition.
Arg!

So I decide to wipe the whole thing with cfdisk and start all over.  Here I
find

partman-lvm_10_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-lvm_10.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_10.dsc
partman-lvm_10.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_10.tar.gz
partman-lvm_10_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_10_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 238382 240298 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman-partitioning_17_i386.changes ACCEPTED


Accepted:
partman-partitioning_17.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_17.dsc
partman-partitioning_17.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_17.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_17_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_17_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 235367 235505 239208 239435 239557 239562 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fixed in NMU of partman-lvm 10

tag 238382 + fixed
tag 240298 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:25:59 -0400
Source: partman-lvm
Binary: partman-lvm
Architecture: source all
Version: 10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 partman-lvm - Add to partman support for LVM (udeb)
Closes: 238382 240298
Changes: 
 partman-lvm (10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Anton Zinoviev
 - rules: remove .svn directories from the package
 - update the package to take advantage of the newly used file
   `use_filesystem'
 - renumber the lvm method (18-50)
 - do not remove $DEVICES/* after LVM-configuration; thanks to Martin
   Michlmayr and Brad Schick, closes: #238382, #240298.
   * Joshua Kwan
 - Switch to new debhelper udeb support.
   * Joey Hess
 - Template polishing.
   * Updated translations:
 - Czech (cs.po) by Miroslav Kure
 - Danish (da.po) by Claus Hindsgaul
 - German (de.po) by Dennis Stampfer
 - Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide EgaÃ±a
 - Gallegan (gl.po) by HÃ©ctor FernÃ¡ndez LÃ³pez
 - Hebrew (he.po) by Lior Kaplan
 - Hungarian (hu.po) by VERÃK IstvÃ¡n
 - Japanese (ja.po) by Kenshi Muto
 - Korean (ko.po) by Changwoo Ryu
 - Lithuanian (lt.po) by KÄstutis BiliÅ«nas
 - Portuguese (pt.po) by Miguel Figueiredo
 - Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by AndrÃ© LuÃs Lopes
 - Slovenian (sl.po) by Jure Äuhalev
 - Albanian (sq.po) by Elian Myftiu
 - Swedish (sv.po) by AndrÃ© Dahlqvist
 - Turkish (tr.po) by Osman YÃ¼ksel
 - Ukrainian (uk.po) by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
 - Traditional Chinese (zh_TW.po) by Tetralet
Files: 
 9792bae69030868b5e115e9342852d24 591 debian-installer standard partman-lvm_10.dsc
 9c275311e0c439d29c17a9d98a816487 27699 debian-installer standard partman-lvm_10.tar.gz
 0a411624e07dc63ae91e69154becc3f8 11470 debian-installer standard 
partman-lvm_10_all.udeb
package-type: udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAefQY2tp5zXiKP0wRAmGlAJ9wHSFHrJaSEZHiP6LowXYlu/S8MgCeJpKs
0E6jYVLFBC5Qsz/TRbmUEwU=
=HT9b
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fixed in NMU of partman-partitioning 17

tag 235367 + fixed
tag 235505 + fixed
tag 239208 + fixed
tag 239435 + fixed
tag 239557 + fixed
tag 239562 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 21:26:35 -0400
Source: partman-partitioning
Binary: partman-partitioning
Architecture: source all
Version: 17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 partman-partitioning - Partitioning operations for partman (udeb)
Closes: 235367 235505 239208 239435 239557 239562
Changes: 
 partman-partitioning (17) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Anton Zinoviev
 - rules: remove .svn directories from the package
 - resizing:
 1. do not allow sizes bigger or smaller than possible.
Thanks to Laurens Blankers, closes: #239208
 2. accept max and nn% as shortcuts for the value of the new size
 3. write changes to the storage device and resize the file system
in the partition only when the partition already exists in the
storage device.  Thanks to Laurens Blankers and
dan_at_watson.ibm.com, closes: #239435, #239562
 - new partition:
 1. the default type is logical when the new partition is near
extended partition.  Thanks to Joey Hess, closes: #235505.
 2. better defaults for the new partition: usage method (format),
file system (ext3) and mount point (first unused from /, /home,
/usr, /tmp, /usr/local).  The bootable flag is untouched
though.  Thanks to Joey Hess and dan_at_watson.ibm.com,
closes: #235367, #239557.
 3. in the main menu of partman the item for the new partition is
default
 4. add progress bar while computing the new state (this happened
to be quiet slow...)
 - active_partition/{delete,toggle_bootable}/do_option: add progress
   bar while computing the new state
   * Joshua Kwan
 - Use new debhelper udeb support.
   * Joey Hess
 - Template polishing.
   * Updated translations:
 - Czech (cs.po) by Miroslav Kuře
 - Danish (da.po) by Claus Hindsgaul
 - German (de.po) by Dennis Stampfer
 - Greek, Modern (1453-) (el.po) by Konstantinos Margaritis
 - Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide Egaña
 - French (fr.po) by Christian Perrier
 - Gallegan (gl.po) by
 - Hebrew (he.po) by Lior Kaplan
 - Hungarian (hu.po) by VERÓK István
 - Indonesian (id.po) by I Gede Wijaya S
 - Italian (it.po) by Stefano Canepa
 - Japanese (ja.po) by Kenshi Muto
 - Korean (ko.po) by Changwoo Ryu
 - Lithuanian (lt.po) by Kęstutis Biliūnas
 - Dutch (nl.po) by Bart Cornelis
 - Polish (pl.po) by Bartosz Fenski
 - Portuguese (pt.po) by Miguel Figueiredo
 - Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by Anré Luís Lopes
 - Romanian (ro.po) by Eddy Petrisor
 - Slovak (sk.po) by Peter KLFMANiK Mann
 - Albanian (sq.po) by Elian Myftiu
 - Swedish (sv.po) by André Dahlqvist
 - Turkish (tr.po) by Osman Yüksel
 - Ukrainian (uk.po) by Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
 - Simplified Chinese (zh_CN.po) by Carlos Z.F. Liu
 - Traditional Chinese (zh_TW.po) by Tetralet
Files: 
 44740678987f464c7aadee16eb29423a 618 debian-installer optional 
partman-partitioning_17.dsc
 ed43fba62f978115b2c6fbbe506ef648 50941 debian-installer optional 
partman-partitioning_17.tar.gz
 ec54fd6a2ab4c92ccebbc4cba5dc9952 28268 debian-installer optional 
partman-partitioning_17_all.udeb
package-type: udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAefSn2tp5zXiKP0wRAnoBAKCJ1ZrdsgK0G+n2fZaXfqbpOODVQgCg02ac
1QGfO2/yEE66I0ZkFK4++38=
=7Djf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a Province of China?

2004-04-11 Thread Erik Steffl

Mathieu Roy wrote:
Russell Coker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Nederland means low land.  The Slovak term for low land would be another 
possible name for the country.


I am surprised to hear there is no official translation of Netherlands
in Slovakia.
I have done just a search with google, and found on the following page
http://monyr.webpark.cz/nizozemsko.htm titled Nizozemsko-Holandsko
  note cz top level domain (czech republic)

(Nederland-Holland) 

If the author of the page is not dumb, I guess that Nizozemsko have
something to do with Netherland.
  yes it does, it's an official czech name for netherlands (it's a 
czech translation of netherlands).

	erik

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243253: Package: installation-reports

2004-04-11 Thread Jared Sulem

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: 2004-04-11 
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/beta3/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux imac 2.4.25-powerpc #1 ven mar 19:29:26 CET 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-04-12, very early morning
Method: Installed from bootable CD.  Installed base from CD.

Machine: Original iMac (ie Bondi Blue)
Processor: 233MHz, 740/750, pmac-generation: NewWorld
Memory: 160MB
Root Device: IDE (QUANTUM FIREBALL SE4.3A, ATA DISK drive)
Root Size/partition table:
4.3 GB hard disk partitioned as follows:
Apple partition map:63 sectors
Root partition: ~3.8GB
Swap partition: ~200MB

Output of lspci:
[ Email me if this is necessary.  I can't currently acquire this. ]

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Partition harddrive - Automatic partitioning was chosen but did not create 800KB 
partition for yaboot to install bootloader in.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#243254: Package: installation-reports

2004-04-11 Thread Jared Sulem

Package: installation-reports 
Debian-installer-version: 2004-04-11 
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/powerpc/beta3/sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux imac 2.4.25-powerpc #1 ven mar 19:29:26 CET 2004 ppc GNU/Linux
Date: 2004-04-12, very early morning
Method: Installed from bootable CD.  Installed base from CD.

Machine: Original iMac (ie Bondi Blue)
Processor: 233MHz, 740/750, pmac-generation: NewWorld
Memory: 160MB
Root Device: IDE (QUANTUM FIREBALL SE4.3A, ATA DISK drive)
Root Size/partition table:
4.3 GB hard disk partitioned as follows:
Apple partition map:63 sectors
Root partition: ~3.8GB
Swap partition: ~200MB

Output of lspci:
[ Email me if this is necessary.  I can't currently acquire this. ]

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [E]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Reboot - Root partition was formatted ReiserFS.  On boot kernel panicked
because it could not mount root filesystem (this happened a couple of 
lines after it said cramfs: wrong magic).  A re-installation using ext3
on the root filesystem worked fine.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of partman-lvm 10

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 238382 + fixed
Bug#238382: After LVM configuration forgets all assigned methods and mount-points
There were no tags set.
Bug#240298: Forget mount points after LVM-configuration
Tags added: fixed

 tag 240298 + fixed
Bug#240298: Forget mount points after LVM-configuration
Tags were: fixed
Bug#238382: After LVM configuration forgets all assigned methods and mount-points
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of partman-target 15

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tag 238060 + fixed
Bug#238060: partman: Needed symbol help
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed

 quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#238389: marked as done (Needs more informative message in the confirmation for writting the changes)

Your message dated Sun, 11 Apr 2004 22:07:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line bug fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2004 14:11:48 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 12 06:11:47 2004
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ms001msg.fastwebnet.it [213.140.2.51] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B1nO7-0007wl-00; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 06:11:47 -0800
Received: from [14.1.192.99] (14.1.192.99) by ms001msg.fastwebnet.it (6.7.019) 
(authenticated as [EMAIL PROTECTED])
id 40317C9F00521C14 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:11:15 +0100
From: Mario Girlando [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation report
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:08:36 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol=application/pgp-signature;
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary=Boundary-02=_zRcUA2k83XwvGsU;
  charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level: 


--Boundary-02=_zRcUA2k83XwvGsU
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: Daily build, 3/8/2004
uname -a: Linux tanis 2.6.3 #1 Wed Mar 3 13:48:37 CET 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 3/8/2004
Method: Installed by usb media (booted from floppy) using businesscard image
Machine: Custom-built Athlon XP, Motherboard Asus A7A, ide disk, Intel
EtherExpress Pro 100 network card.
Processor: Athlon XP 1700+
Memory: 256 MB
Root Device: ide, /dev/hda3
Root Size/partition table:
relevant part of /etc/fstab:

/dev/hda3   /   reiserfs
/dev/hda2   noneswap
/dev/hda4   /home   ext3
/dev/hda1   /mnt/winme  vfat

parted print command:
MinorStart   End Type  Filesystem  Flags
1  0.031   6800.954  primary   fat32   boot
3   6800.955  13845.080  primary   reiserfs
2  13845.081  13986.276  primary   linux-swap
4  13986.277  38170.063  primary   ext3

Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: ALi Corporation M1647 Northbridge [MAGiK 1 / MobileMAG=
iK=20
1] (rev b0)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: ALi Corporation PCI to AGP Controller
00:02.0 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
00:04.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c4)
00:06.0 USB Controller: ALi Corporation USB 1.1 Controller (rev 03)
00:07.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation M1533 PCI to ISA Bridge [Aladdin IV]
00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev =
04)
00:0c.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 04)
00:0c.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port (rev=
=20
01)
00:11.0 Bridge: ALi Corporation M7101 PMU
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX=
=20
400] (rev a1)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

The installation just worked. A couple of minor complaints about partman:
=2D I installed from usb media, and partitioned the disk manually. So
  I was quite surprised to see my usb keychain on the list of=20
  partitionable hard drives. I don't think a user wants to format the=20
  disk he's installing from... :)
=2D On the final question where it asks if you want to proceed with=20
  partitioning/formatting/mounting, it should probably print a summary
  of the changes it is about to make to the hd or, at least, a summary
  of the partitions it is about to wipe clean. Just to be sure a newbie
  doesn't delete its windows partition by mistake :)
 =20
Other than that, it was flawless. Great work, people!

Bug#238363: marked as done (Doesn't handle properly dvh disk labels (mips))