Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Frans,

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Frans Pop  wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop  wrote:
>> > No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the
>> > complexity here.
>>
>> I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't mind to explain.
>
> Try a grep for codename. It's a fairly basic check when doing something
> like this and should have made you alert.
>
> I'll give you a hint: installation from CD without use of a mirror. In
> that case mirror/codename never gets set. Not the most common use case,
> but very much a valid one for Lenny+1/2. That's exactly why I said you'd
> probably only notice the bug after release: you'd probably never think
> (or have time) to test that installation variant, although IMO it's
> one of the more essential test cases.

Yes, I've forgotten about this use case.. indeed.

> Suggest you do some research based on my hint. You'll learn something.
> You should look at least at cdrom-detect and apt-setup.

Will do, and thanks by making it clear.

>> Anyway an alternative patch is attached.
>
> That's not what I call KISS. Main problem is that in ~2 years time
> someone will have to untangle what exactly is legacy and what is not.

Yes, your version is easier to cleanup after squeeze goes out.

Please go ahead and commit it. I'll drop my local branch.

-- 
Otavio Salvador  O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#517644: reopening

2009-05-20 Thread Vincent . McIntyre

package: choose-mirror
tags 517644 + reopen
thanks

Hi,

I just tried to use the lenny installer to install an etch i386 system.
The same issue as before occurs, see the /var/log/installer/syslog
extract below.

I redid the install with suite="oldstable" in the PXE boot line and got 
the same result. Unlike Jeremy's test back in March, the installer selects

'lenny-support' in both tests.

I am using the i386 netinst in the official mirrors, downloaded yesterday.
boot-screens/f1.txt says the build date was '20090123lenny1'.
However /var/log/installer/lsb-release is a little inconsistent:
  DISTRIB_RELEASE="5.0 (lenny) - installer build 20090123"
Should it not be 20090123lenny1?

Did choose-mirror-2.28lenny2 not make it in to lenny 5.0r1?
How would I check that the installer I am using has the correct version
of choose-mirror?

Question: now that 'etch-support' is no longer in testing, is it now
not possibly to try using the squeeze installer to install "oldstable"?

syslog extracts:
 May 20 07:40:10 kernel: [0.00] Kernel command line: auto=true
   priority=critical vga=normal suite="etch"
   initrd=debian/lenny/i386/debian-installer/i386/initrd.gz
   url=http://webserver/./preseed/debian/etch/i386/wkstn-lenny.cfg
...
  May 20 07:40:20 main-menu[1245]: INFO: Menu item 'network-preseed'
selected
  May 20 07:40:20 preseed: successfully loaded preseed file from
 http://webserver/./preseed/debian/etch/i386/wkstn-lenny.cfg
...
  May 20 07:40:20 preseed: successfully loaded preseed file from
 http://webserver/./preseed/debian/etch/i386/mirror.cfg
...
  May 20 07:40:20 main-menu[1245]: INFO: Menu item 'choose-mirror'
selected
  May 20 07:40:20 anna-install: Queueing udeb apt-mirror-setup for later
installation
  May 20 07:40:20 choose-mirror[6497]: DEBUG: command: wget -q
http://apt-proxy:/debian//dists/oldstable/Release -O - |
grep ^Suite: | cut -d' ' -f 2
  May 20 07:40:21 choose-mirror[6497]: DEBUG: command: wget -q
http://apt-proxy:/debian//dists/stable/Release -O - |
grep ^Codename: | cut -d' ' -f 2
  May 20 07:40:22 choose-mirror[6497]: INFO: codename set to: lenny
  May 20 07:40:22 choose-mirror[6497]: DEBUG: command: wget -q
http://apt-proxy:/debian//dists/stable/main/binary-i386/Release
-O - | grep Architecture
...

As before I manually checked the wget commands and got the right answer,
ie oldstable/Release has Codename: etch. But as before the installer 
resets choose-mirror/suite to 'stable'.


The mirror preseed contains these settings:
 d-i mirror/protocol string http
 d-i mirror/country  string enter information manually
 d-i mirror/http/countries   select enter information manually
 d-i mirror/http/hostnamestring apt-proxy:
 d-i mirror/http/directory   string /debian/
 d-i mirror/http/proxy   string
 d-i mirror/suitestring oldstable
 d-i mirror/codename string etch
 d-i apt-setup/services-selectmultiselect  security
 d-i apt-setup/security_host  string  apt-proxy:/security
 d-i apt-setup/contribboolean  true
 d-i apt-setup/non-free   boolean  true




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I've already added the missing $ROOT in dpkg --compare-versions call,
> locally.

Which means you're still missing it in the dpkg -s call?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop  wrote:
> > No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the
> > complexity here.
>
> I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't mind to explain.

Try a grep for codename. It's a fairly basic check when doing something
like this and should have made you alert.

I'll give you a hint: installation from CD without use of a mirror. In
that case mirror/codename never gets set. Not the most common use case,
but very much a valid one for Lenny+1/2. That's exactly why I said you'd
probably only notice the bug after release: you'd probably never think
(or have time) to test that installation variant, although IMO it's
one of the more essential test cases.

Suggest you do some research based on my hint. You'll learn something.
You should look at least at cdrom-detect and apt-setup.

> Anyway an alternative patch is attached.

That's not what I call KISS. Main problem is that in ~2 years time
someone will have to untangle what exactly is legacy and what is not.

Here's how I would do it. Yes, there is (minor) code duplication, but it
is also 100% clear what is legacy and what's not and cleaning it up is
trivial. It is also much simpler to check the legacy support in the new
version for correctness by doing a 'svn diff -r53753 user-setup-apply'.

This is after my cleanup commit to remove unused OPT var in current code.

Index: user-setup-apply
===
--- user-setup-apply(revision 58644)
+++ user-setup-apply(working copy)
@@ -28,10 +28,26 @@
local USER PASSWD
USER="$1"
PASSWD="$2"
-   if [ "$3" = true ]; then
-   $chroot $ROOT usermod --password=$PASSWD $USER
-   else
-   $chroot $ROOT chpasswd <

Please unblock eglibc/2.9-12

2009-05-20 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi,

eglibc 2.9-12 is now in the archive for more than ten days, but it is
not considered by britney because the version tracking does not work
with the source package name change.

The current RC bugs are already present in testing. One is already fixed
in the SVN and will be closed in 2.9-13.

Could you please unblock eglibc/2.9-12? Thanks in advance.

Cheers,
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello,

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Otavio Salvador
 wrote:
> I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't mind to explain. Anyway
> an alternative patch is attached.

I've already added the missing $ROOT in dpkg --compare-versions call, locally.

-- 
Otavio Salvador  O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Frans,

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop  wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> I belive this does all right now. Patch attached.
>
> No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the complexity
> here.

I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't mind to explain. Anyway
an alternative patch is attached.

-- 
Otavio Salvador  O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 38a556c7bdf6e61edebaadf7c9d6d20509b6fcd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Otavio Salvador 
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:39:48 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Add support for old passwd utilities that are used in Lenny.

---
 packages/user-setup/debian/changelog |6 ++
 packages/user-setup/user-setup-apply |   17 +++--
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog b/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog
index 6330ce7..f4d06ed 100644
--- a/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog
+++ b/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+user-setup (1.26) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Add support for old passwd utilities that are used in Lenny.
+
+ -- Otavio Salvador   Wed, 20 May 2009 17:39:24 -0300
+
 user-setup (1.25) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Brown paper bag release
diff --git a/packages/user-setup/user-setup-apply b/packages/user-setup/user-setup-apply
index 56b2357..173815b 100755
--- a/packages/user-setup/user-setup-apply
+++ b/packages/user-setup/user-setup-apply
@@ -25,10 +25,23 @@ fi
 # Pass in three arguments: the user, the password, and 'true' if the
 # password has been pre-crypted (by preseeding).
 setpassword () {
-	local USER PASSWD OPTS
+	local USER PASSWD OPTS VERSION LEGACY
 	USER="$1"
 	PASSWD="$2"
-	if [ "$3" = true ]; then
+
+	# legacy support for versions that aren't using the PAM support
+	VERSION=`$chroot dpkg -s passwd | sed -n '/^Version:/s,^Version: ,,p'`
+	LEGACY=
+	if $chroot dpkg --compare-versions $VERSION lt 1:4.1.4-1; then
+		LEGACY=true
+		if [ "$3" = true ]; then
+			OPTS=-e
+		else
+			OPTS=-m
+		fi
+	fi
+
+	if [ "$3" = true ] && [ -z "$LEGACY" ]; then
 		$chroot $ROOT usermod --password=$PASSWD $USER
 	else
 		$chroot $ROOT chpasswd $OPTS <

Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I belive this does all right now. Patch attached.

No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the complexity 
here.

KISS! Especially because the risk is huge that you will only find bugs in 
such code _after_ you've already released.

> I though about adding conditional code for it but it looks ugly for me.

If you code it correctly it does not need to be ugly.

It's also much simpler and keeps the compatibility code clearly for 
everybody to see. Also much simpler to clean up when no longer needed 
after the release of Squeeze.


And please, please, please don't CC me on replies!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello,

Here goes a fixed patch for review.

-- 
Otavio Salvador  O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 607dc2fe724748617498d79f22be82816f95014e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Otavio Salvador 
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:24:12 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Use a specific script by suite for setting the password. This restores the compatibility with Lenny through lenny-support package (that will provide the lenny.sh script).

---
 packages/user-setup/debian/changelog   |8 ++
 packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup-udeb.install |1 +
 packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup.install  |1 +
 packages/user-setup/scripts/default.sh |   20 ++
 packages/user-setup/scripts/lenny.sh   |   13 +
 packages/user-setup/user-setup-apply   |   27 +--
 6 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 packages/user-setup/scripts/default.sh
 create mode 100644 packages/user-setup/scripts/lenny.sh

diff --git a/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog b/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog
index 6330ce7..2d181ed 100644
--- a/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog
+++ b/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+user-setup (1.26) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Use a specific script by suite for setting the password. This restores
+the compatibility with Lenny through lenny-support package (that will
+provide the lenny.sh script).
+
+ -- Otavio Salvador   Wed, 20 May 2009 15:22:25 -0300
+
 user-setup (1.25) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Brown paper bag release
diff --git a/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup-udeb.install b/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup-udeb.install
index 29c7804..f351806 100644
--- a/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup-udeb.install
+++ b/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup-udeb.install
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 user-setup-ask usr/bin
 user-setup-apply usr/bin
 functions.sh usr/lib/user-setup
+scripts usr/lib/user-setup
 reserved-usernames usr/lib/user-setup
 finish-install.d usr/lib
 pre-pkgsel.d usr/lib
diff --git a/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup.install b/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup.install
index 1014600..4a10db2 100644
--- a/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup.install
+++ b/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup.install
@@ -2,4 +2,5 @@ user-setup usr/bin
 user-setup-ask usr/lib/user-setup
 user-setup-apply usr/lib/user-setup
 functions.sh usr/lib/user-setup
+scripts usr/lib/user-setup
 reserved-usernames usr/lib/user-setup
diff --git a/packages/user-setup/scripts/default.sh b/packages/user-setup/scripts/default.sh
new file mode 100644
index 000..6de3488
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/user-setup/scripts/default.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+# Set a password, via chpasswd.
+# Use a heredoc rather than echo, to avoid the password
+# showing in the process table. (However, this is normally
+# only called when first installing the system, when root has no
+# password at all, so that should be an unnecessary precaution).
+#
+# Pass in three arguments: the user, the password, and 'true' if the
+# password has been pre-crypted (by preseeding).
+setpassword () {
+	local USER PASSWD OPTS
+	USER="$1"
+	PASSWD="$2"
+	if [ "$3" = true ]; then
+		$chroot $ROOT usermod --password=$PASSWD $USER
+	else
+		$chroot $ROOT chpasswd $OPTS <

Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Christian Perrier  
wrote:
> > - another solution proposed by otavio that I haven't been able to
> > understand: he'll propose a patch soon
>
> I'm sending the attached patch for people to comment. My idea is that
> the lenny.sh script to be included in lenny-support udeb and then it
> is only included here for reference.

This is incredibly broken. Suggest you check a LOT better when and how 
mirror/suite and related variables are set and used. You have missed at 
least three issues here.

Also, the indentation of your lenny script is broken.

IMO Christians solution (get the version of the installed package and do a 
simple dpkg --compare-versions) is a better implementation for this 
issue. This seems over-engineered to me.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#529640: console-setup-udeb: Should allow reconfiguring the keyboard

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:12:57PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Once one has gone through the "Configure the keyboard" step in D-I
> > (indeed a modified D-I where console-setup-udeb is used in place of
> > kbd-config), it is not possible to come over the questions again.
> >
> > Reselecting the "Configure the keyboard" menu entry (in expert mode)
> > just does nothingprobably because the debconf questions are
> > "seen".
>
> I can easily make the config script reset the 'seen' flag of all
> templates if this is the proper solution of the problem.

Debconf does not set the seen flag automatically. Does the script set the 
seen flag itself? If so, why?

Suggest someone does an install with debconf debugging enabled and 
maybe 'set -x' added in the scripts. That would at least show what the 
problem is instead of needing to speculate about it.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Christian,

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Christian Perrier  wrote:
> - another solution proposed by otavio that I haven't been able to
> understand: he'll propose a patch soon

I'm sending the attached patch for people to comment. My idea is that
the lenny.sh script to be included in lenny-support udeb and then it
is only included here for reference.

-- 
Otavio Salvador  O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br  http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 53d3b2046d81da6a867da2b9bbc22c6c3f01eee4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Otavio Salvador 
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:24:12 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Use a specific script by suite for setting the password. This restores the compatibility with Lenny through lenny-support package (that will provide the lenny.sh script).

---
 packages/user-setup/debian/changelog   |8 ++
 packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup-udeb.install |1 +
 packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup.install  |1 +
 packages/user-setup/scripts/default.sh |   20 ++
 packages/user-setup/scripts/lenny.sh   |   11 
 packages/user-setup/user-setup-apply   |   27 +--
 6 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 packages/user-setup/scripts/default.sh
 create mode 100644 packages/user-setup/scripts/lenny.sh

diff --git a/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog b/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog
index 6330ce7..2d181ed 100644
--- a/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog
+++ b/packages/user-setup/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+user-setup (1.26) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Use a specific script by suite for setting the password. This restores
+the compatibility with Lenny through lenny-support package (that will
+provide the lenny.sh script).
+
+ -- Otavio Salvador   Wed, 20 May 2009 15:22:25 -0300
+
 user-setup (1.25) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Brown paper bag release
diff --git a/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup-udeb.install b/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup-udeb.install
index 29c7804..f351806 100644
--- a/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup-udeb.install
+++ b/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup-udeb.install
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 user-setup-ask usr/bin
 user-setup-apply usr/bin
 functions.sh usr/lib/user-setup
+scripts usr/lib/user-setup
 reserved-usernames usr/lib/user-setup
 finish-install.d usr/lib
 pre-pkgsel.d usr/lib
diff --git a/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup.install b/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup.install
index 1014600..4a10db2 100644
--- a/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup.install
+++ b/packages/user-setup/debian/user-setup.install
@@ -2,4 +2,5 @@ user-setup usr/bin
 user-setup-ask usr/lib/user-setup
 user-setup-apply usr/lib/user-setup
 functions.sh usr/lib/user-setup
+scripts usr/lib/user-setup
 reserved-usernames usr/lib/user-setup
diff --git a/packages/user-setup/scripts/default.sh b/packages/user-setup/scripts/default.sh
new file mode 100644
index 000..6de3488
--- /dev/null
+++ b/packages/user-setup/scripts/default.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+# Set a password, via chpasswd.
+# Use a heredoc rather than echo, to avoid the password
+# showing in the process table. (However, this is normally
+# only called when first installing the system, when root has no
+# password at all, so that should be an unnecessary precaution).
+#
+# Pass in three arguments: the user, the password, and 'true' if the
+# password has been pre-crypted (by preseeding).
+setpassword () {
+	local USER PASSWD OPTS
+	USER="$1"
+	PASSWD="$2"
+	if [ "$3" = true ]; then
+		$chroot $ROOT usermod --password=$PASSWD $USER
+	else
+		$chroot $ROOT chpasswd $OPTS <

Bug#529649: console-setup-udeb: Priority for the layout question should be "high"

2009-05-20 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:27:43PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> 
> The config script takes great care to provide sane defaults for the keyboard
> layout, depending on language and/or language/country settings.
> 
> For that reason, I think that the priority of the  console-setup/layout
> question should be "high" and not critical. Please note that kbd-config
> already uses high for its own question about keymap.

Is this a proposal only for the udeb?  For the regular package it seems 
to me that critical priority is appropriate because:

1. it is impossible to be sure that the defaults are correct

2. when they are not correct this can be potentialy a disaster

3. It seems one (or two) extra questions about the keyboard with good 
defaults are worthy considering what kind of trouble they have the 
potential to save the user from.

But I am not firm in my opinion so I will accept whatever is decided 
(both for the udeb and the regular packages).

Anton Zinoviev




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#529640: console-setup-udeb: Should allow reconfiguring the keyboard

2009-05-20 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:12:57PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> 
> Once one has gone through the "Configure the keyboard" step in D-I (indeed a
> modified D-I where console-setup-udeb is used in place of kbd-config), it is
> not possible to come over the questions again.
> 
> Reselecting the "Configure the keyboard" menu entry (in expert mode) just
> does nothingprobably because the debconf questions are "seen".

I can easily make the config script reset the 'seen' flag of all 
templates if this is the proper solution of the problem.

Anton Zinoviev




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#529643: console-setup-udeb: Should skip console-setup/model when only one model exists for a given layout

2009-05-20 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:15:20PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> 
> When choosing an origin (for instance Albania) that only has one layout, it
> is kinda useless to ask about the layout...as only one choice is possible.
> So I propose skipping that question in such case.

Debconf doesn't ask such questions.  Does cdebconf ask them?  If yes, 
then maybe a clone of this bug needs to be reassigned to cdebconf.

Anton Zinoviev




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



user-setup_1.25_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-05-20 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
user-setup_1.25.dsc
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.25.dsc
user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
user-setup_1.25_all.deb
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.25_all.deb


Override entries for your package:
user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb - standard debian-installer
user-setup_1.25.dsc - source misc
user-setup_1.25_all.deb - extra admin

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: "Unneeded" packages being installed

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Still using the minimal install example (without selection "standard
> system" nor other task), shouldn't them have their priority lowered
> then?

Possibly. But that is something that probably should have been done 
*before* lenny was released. I doubt the FTP masters would be willing to 
correct it now.

But that is where this issue should be reported: against the
"ftp.debian.org" pseudo package; it is not a Debian Installer issue.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processing of user-setup_1.25_i386.changes

2009-05-20 Thread Archive Administrator
user-setup_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  user-setup_1.25.dsc
  user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
  user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
  user-setup_1.25_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processing of user-setup_1.25_i386.changes

2009-05-20 Thread Archive Administrator
user-setup_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
  user-setup_1.25.dsc
  user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
  user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
  user-setup_1.25_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#529649: console-setup-udeb: Priority for the layout question should be "high"

2009-05-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Package: console-setup-udeb
Severity: normal

The config script takes great care to provide sane defaults for the keyboard
layout, depending on language and/or language/country settings.

For that reason, I think that the priority of the  console-setup/layout
question should be "high" and not critical. Please note that kbd-config
already uses high for its own question about keymap.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: "Unneeded" packages being installed

2009-05-20 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi Frans!

On Wed, 20 May 2009 17:31:04 +0200
Frans Pop  wrote:

> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > Frans Pop schrieb:
> > >> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
> > >> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
> > >> minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel
> > >> appears), I see that some packages are installed but don't see
> > >> to be needed. For example (Lenny install):
> > >>   libsasl2-2
> > >>   libgnutls26
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > > I also don't see why deborphan should report them. mutt depends on
> > > the first and exim4-daemon-light on the second. Both are packages
> > > that should be installed by default.
> >
> > Are you sure exim4-daemon-light and mutt are being installed when
> > selecting no task at all?  I thought they only came when at least
> > "standard system" is selected (which doesn't seem to be the case
> > here).

That is what I was going to ask.
mutt and exim4 aren't installed if the "Standard system" task isn't
selected.

deborphan catches libsasl2-2 and libgnutls26. If removed then the
other libraries (libgcrypt11 and libtasn1-3; libgpg-error0) stay without
reverse-dependencies (deborphan reports them too).
At least from an user point of view, they are 5 unneeded libs, right?

> That does not change the fact that the libs are installed in their
> own right by debootstrap because of their priority.
> If their priority is incorrect, then that's something for the FTP
> masters. But I did not check the full reverse dependency list, I just
> picked out a few programs I recognized.

Still using the minimal install example (without selection "standard
system" nor other task), shouldn't them have their priority lowered
then?

Thank you!

Best regards,
Nelson


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#529640: console-setup-udeb: Should allow reconfiguring the keyboard

2009-05-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Package: console-setup-udeb
Severity: normal

Once one has gone through the "Configure the keyboard" step in D-I (indeed a
modified D-I where console-setup-udeb is used in place of kbd-config), it is
not possible to come over the questions again.

Reselecting the "Configure the keyboard" menu entry (in expert mode) just
does nothingprobably because the debconf questions are "seen".

All other D-I components allow coming back and have the questions asked
again. This bug report is here to not forget about this problemuntil I
re-figure out how we do this in other componentsor until someone
refreshes my mind..:-)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#529643: console-setup-udeb: Should skip console-setup/model when only one model exists for a given layout

2009-05-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Package: console-setup-udeb
Severity: normal

When choosing an origin (for instance Albania) that only has one layout, it
is kinda useless to ask about the layout...as only one choice is possible.
So I propose skipping that question in such case.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



kernel-wedge 2.58 MIGRATED to testing

2009-05-20 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the kernel-wedge source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 2.57
  Current version:  2.58

-- 
This email is automatically generated once a day.  As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later changes on the next day.
See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > +user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
> > +  [ Christian Perrier ]
> > +  * No longer use the "-m" switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
> > +longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
> > +libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.
> >
> > Does this mean it is no longer possible to preseed using plain
> > passwords?
> 
> Never mind.

Still, we have an issue (raised by Martin Michlmayr): that change will
break lenny'n'half.

We briefly discussed this on IRC with otavio and two solutions come to
mind:

- test the version of passwd in /target and adapt the behaviour of
user-setup-apply accordingly

- another solution proposed by otavio that I haven't been able to
understand: he'll propose a patch soon


-- 




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#529307: installation report

2009-05-20 Thread Steven Sciame


 As I described in an earlier post, "it didn't work" refers to the error 
message telling me that, "Configuration of the wireless network failed.  Either 
I got the name wrong or it is taking too long to connect."  Something to that  
effect.

I tried to continue on as long as I could, but you eventually get to the point 
that you need an internet connection to complete the install.

The install went flawless with Knoppix and Ubuntu.   I was reading up on Debian 
and I was kind of hoping to use that one.  What is the next step?

   


--- On Wed, 5/20/09, Christian Perrier  wrote:

From: Christian Perrier 
Subject: Re: Bug#529307: installation report
To: "Steven Sciame" 
Cc: 529...@bugs.debian.org
Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2009, 3:43 AM

Quoting Steven Sciame (sasci...@yahoo.com):
> Hello,
> 
>     Thank you for the reply.  I typed in wireless because that was the ESSID 
> that I wanted to connect to, but it didn't work and without a connection you 
> can only get so far with the install.  It seemed like it would be fine all 
> the way up to the configure wireless network.  
> 
>     I installed Ubuntu and in worked perfectly.  I kind of wanted to use 
> Debian though.  Any suggestions on my next step?


It's fairly hard to tell when the only information you mention is "it
didn't work"..:-)

What exactly did you do at the network configuration step and what
was/were the error message(s)?




  

Re: "Unneeded" packages being installed

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Frans Pop schrieb:
> >> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
> >> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
> >> minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I
> >> see that some packages are installed but don't see to be needed. For
> >> example (Lenny install):
> >>   libsasl2-2
> >>   libgnutls26
>
> [..]
>
> > I also don't see why deborphan should report them. mutt depends on
> > the first and exim4-daemon-light on the second. Both are packages
> > that should be installed by default.
>
> Are you sure exim4-daemon-light and mutt are being installed when
> selecting no task at all?  I thought they only came when at least
> "standard system" is selected (which doesn't seem to be the case here).

That does not change the fact that the libs are installed in their own 
right by debootstrap because of their priority.
If their priority is incorrect, then that's something for the FTP masters. 
But I did not check the full reverse dependency list, I just picked out a 
few programs I recognized.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Please unblock glib2.0 and atk1.0

2009-05-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi,

glib2.0 and atk1.0 have been ready to migrate to testing for a while.
The former has a RC bug fixed and the other which is  Is it possible to
unblock them?

Thanks,
-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'   “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
  `- future understand things”  -- Jörg Schilling


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée


Re: "Unneeded" packages being installed

2009-05-20 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi!

Frans Pop schrieb:

>> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
>> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
>> minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
>> that some packages are installed but don't see to be needed.
>> For example (Lenny install):
>>   libsasl2-2
>>   libgnutls26
[..]
> I also don't see why deborphan should report them. mutt depends on the 
> first and exim4-daemon-light on the second. Both are packages that should 
> be installed by default.

Are you sure exim4-daemon-light and mutt are being installed when selecting
no task at all?  I thought they only came when at least "standard system"
is selected (which doesn't seem to be the case here).


Best regards,
  Alexander


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: "Unneeded" packages being installed

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
> problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
> minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
> that some packages are installed but don't see to be needed.
> For example (Lenny install):
>
>   libsasl2-2
>   libgnutls26

I checked these first two. Both have "Priority: important" and are thus 
installed by debootstrap.

I also don't see why deborphan should report them. mutt depends on the 
first and exim4-daemon-light on the second. Both are packages that should 
be installed by default.

>   libgcrypt11
>   libtasn1-3
>   libgpg-error0

The same is probably true for the others. If any of them has "Priority: 
standard", they are installed if you select the "Standard system" task.

> Also, probably there is an answer for this, but why are these packages
> also installed (and why are they necessary), please?
>
>   aspell
>   aspell-pt-br
>   aspell-pt-pt
>   dictionaries-common
>   ibrazilian
>   iportuguese
>   ispell
>   libaspell15
>   wbrazilian
>   wportuguese
>
> It's a minimal Lenny install too, with Brazilian Portuguese language
> selected.

That's the reason: the language task for pt_BR is installed automatically.
See last para on http://www.debian.org/releases/lenny/i386/apds02.html.en.
(Should probably also be mentioned in section 6.3.5.2.)

Cheers,
FJP


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



"Unneeded" packages being installed

2009-05-20 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
(CC me on replies, please)

Hi!

Sorry if this "issue" was already discussed and if this is not a
problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
that some packages are installed but don't see to be needed.
For example (Lenny install):

  libsasl2-2
  libgnutls26
  libgcrypt11
  libtasn1-3
  libgpg-error0

You can verify this by installing deborphan after the system install.
Are they needed by something?

Also, probably there is an answer for this, but why are these packages
also installed (and why are they necessary), please?

  aspell
  aspell-pt-br
  aspell-pt-pt
  dictionaries-common
  ibrazilian
  iportuguese
  ispell
  libaspell15
  wbrazilian
  wportuguese

It's a minimal Lenny install too, with Brazilian Portuguese language
selected.
For example, if I am going to use a machine just as a simple router
between two networks. I can't see why I need to have dictionaries
installed.

Sorry if the questions are stupid.
Thank you very much!

Best regards,
Nelson


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79_multi.changes ACCEPTED

2009-05-20 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
crc-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/crc-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
crc-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/crc-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
crypto-dm-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/crypto-dm-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
crypto-dm-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/crypto-dm-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
efi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/efi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
efi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/efi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
fat-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/fat-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
fat-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/fat-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
fb-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/fb-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
fb-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/fb-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
firewire-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/firewire-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
firewire-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/firewire-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ide-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ide-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ide-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/ide-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
input-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/input-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
input-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-ker

linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-05-20 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
crc-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/crc-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
crypto-dm-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/crypto-dm-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
efi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/efi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
fat-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/fat-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
fb-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/fb-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
firewire-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/firewire-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
ide-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ide-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
input-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/input-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
ipv6-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ipv6-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
irda-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/irda-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
isofs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/isofs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
jfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/jfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
kernel-image-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/kernel-image-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.dsc
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.tar.gz
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.tar.gz
loop-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/loop-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
md-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/md-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
mmc-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/mmc-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
mouse-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/mouse-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
multipath-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/multipath-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/nic-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/nic-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/nic-pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-shared-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/nic-shared-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-usb-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/nic-usb-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-wireless-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/nic-wireless-mo

Processing of linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79_multi.changes

2009-05-20 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  squashfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  kernel-image-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  fb-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  jfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pata-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  loop-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  plip-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  scsi-common-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-wireless-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  plip-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  parport-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  uinput-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pata-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  fat-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  xfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-usb-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  virtio-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  qnx4-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  scsi-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  crc-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  zlib-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  xfs-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  firewire-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  scsi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  reiserfs-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  md-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  jfs-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  sata-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ntfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  fat-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  serial-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ipv6-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pcmcia-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  usb-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  mmc-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  fb-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ntfs-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  serial-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  mouse-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  mmc-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  parport-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  mouse-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  md-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  crypto-dm-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  scsi-common-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  efi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  input-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ata-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-shared-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  zlib-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  scsi-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nls-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ipv6-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nls-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  virtio-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  sata-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pcmcia-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-shared-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  irda-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  usb-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  usb-serial-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79.tar.gz
  nic-usb-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  kernel-image-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  usb-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ppp-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  usb-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  uinput-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ppp-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  isofs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  squashfs-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.ud

Processing of linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79_multi.changes

2009-05-20 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79_multi.changes uploaded successfully to 
ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
  squashfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  kernel-image-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  fb-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  jfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pata-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  loop-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  plip-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  scsi-common-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-wireless-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  plip-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  parport-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  uinput-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pata-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  fat-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  xfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-usb-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  virtio-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  qnx4-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  scsi-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  crc-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  zlib-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  xfs-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  firewire-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  scsi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  reiserfs-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  md-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  jfs-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  sata-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ntfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  fat-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  serial-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ipv6-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pcmcia-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  usb-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  mmc-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  fb-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ntfs-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  serial-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  mouse-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  mmc-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  parport-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  mouse-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  md-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  crypto-dm-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  scsi-common-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  efi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  input-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ata-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-shared-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  zlib-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  scsi-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nls-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ipv6-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nls-core-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  virtio-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  sata-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  pcmcia-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-shared-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  irda-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  usb-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  usb-serial-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79.tar.gz
  nic-usb-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  kernel-image-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  nic-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  usb-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ppp-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  usb-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  uinput-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  ppp-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  isofs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
  squashfs-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di

Processing of linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56_amd64.changes

2009-05-20 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.dsc
  linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.tar.gz
  kernel-image-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-wireless-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-shared-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  serial-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  usb-serial-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ppp-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ide-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  pata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  firewire-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  scsi-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  scsi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  scsi-common-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  scsi-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  plip-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  loop-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ipv6-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nls-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  isofs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  jfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ntfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  reiserfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  xfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  fat-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ufs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  qnx4-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  md-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  multipath-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  usb-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  usb-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  pcmcia-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  fb-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  input-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  mouse-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  irda-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  parport-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-usb-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  sata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  crc-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  crypto-dm-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  efi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  mmc-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  squashfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  zlib-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  virtio-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  uinput-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  sound-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processing of linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56_amd64.changes

2009-05-20 Thread Archive Administrator
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to 
ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
  linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.dsc
  linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.tar.gz
  kernel-image-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-wireless-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-shared-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  serial-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  usb-serial-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ppp-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ide-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  pata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ide-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  cdrom-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  firewire-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  scsi-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  scsi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  scsi-common-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  scsi-extra-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  plip-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  floppy-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  loop-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ipv6-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nls-core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ext3-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ext4-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  isofs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  jfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ntfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  reiserfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  xfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  fat-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ufs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  qnx4-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  md-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  multipath-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  usb-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  usb-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  pcmcia-storage-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  fb-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  input-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  mouse-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  irda-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  parport-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  pcmcia-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  nic-usb-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  sata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  core-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  crc-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  crypto-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  crypto-dm-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  efi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  ata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  mmc-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  squashfs-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  zlib-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  virtio-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  uinput-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
  sound-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> +user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
> +  [ Christian Perrier ]
> +  * No longer use the "-m" switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
> +longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
> +libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.
>
> Does this mean it is no longer possible to preseed using plain
> passwords?

Never mind.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



user-setup (1.24)

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
+user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
+  [ Christian Perrier ]
+  * No longer use the "-m" switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
+longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
+libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.

Does this mean it is no longer possible to preseed using plain passwords?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: setting package to console-setup-sun5-ekmap console-setup-fonts-udeb bdf2psf console-setup-ataritt-ekmap console-setup-pc-ekmap console-setup-sun4-ekmap console-setup-mini console-setup-ude

2009-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> #console-setup (1.37) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> #  * Use dpkg --print-architecture debconf config script. Closes: #529574
> #
> package console-setup-sun5-ekmap console-setup-fonts-udeb bdf2psf 
> console-setup-ataritt-ekmap console-setup-pc-ekmap console-setup-sun4-ekmap 
> console-setup-mini console-setup-udeb console-setup-amiga-ekmap console-setup 
> console-setup-macintoshold-ekmap
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: console-setup-sun5-ekmap 
console-setup-fonts-udeb bdf2psf console-setup-ataritt-ekmap 
console-setup-pc-ekmap console-setup-sun4-ekmap console-setup-mini 
console-setup-udeb console-setup-amiga-ekmap console-setup-macintoshold-ekmap 
console-setup

> tags 529574 + pending
Bug#529574: console-setup: Should not use obsolete dpkg 
--print-installation-architecture
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#528610: marked as done (chpasswd encrypted option is gone)

2009-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Wed, 20 May 2009 11:32:04 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#528610: fixed in user-setup 1.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #528610,
regarding chpasswd encrypted option is gone
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
528610: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528610
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: user-setup
Version: 1.23
Severity: normal
Architecture: all

Hello,

The utility user-setup-apply uses the command:
chpasswd -e

Installing the new version of the passwd package ,
user-setup-apply does not work,

The package passwd has changed from version (1:4.1.3.1-1)
to (1:4.1.4-1)
and the option encrypted in chpasswd is not allowed now.

# chpasswd -h
Usage: chpasswd [options]

Options:
  -c, --crypt-methodthe crypt method (one of NONE DES MD5 SHA256 
SHA512)
  -e, --encrypted   supplied passwords are encrypted
  -h, --helpdisplay this help message and exit
  -m, --md5 encrypt the clear text password using
the MD5 algorithm
  -s, --sha-rounds  number of SHA rounds for the SHA*
crypt algorithms

# aptitude install passwd/unstable

# chpasswd -h
Usage: chpasswd [options]

Options:
  -h, --helpdisplay this help message and exit

Thanks,

Jordi


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: user-setup
Source-Version: 1.24

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
user-setup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
user-setup_1.24.dsc
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24.dsc
user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
user-setup_1.24_all.deb
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 528...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Perrier  (supplier of updated user-setup package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 09:40:54 +0200
Source: user-setup
Binary: user-setup-udeb user-setup
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team 
Changed-By: Christian Perrier 
Description: 
 user-setup - Set up initial user and password
 user-setup-udeb - Set up users and passwords (udeb)
Closes: 528610 529475
Changes: 
 user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Colin Watson ]
   * Be more careful about test arguments in the root_password function, in
 case (for example) the encrypted password string is "!" (thanks, Uli
 Heller; LP: #307443).
 .
   [ Joey Hess ]
   * Add initial user to scanner group, (created by libsane).
 .
   [ Frans Pop ]
   * Remove myself as uploader.
 .
   [ Luk Claes ]
   * Add myself as uploader.
   * Disable root account and activate sudo when there is no root passwd given.
 .
   [ Christian Perrier ]
   * No longer use the "-m" switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
 longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
 libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.
 Closes: #529475
   * Replace chpasswd by usermod to set pre-encrypted passwords.
 Thanks to Jordi Pujol for the patch.
 Closes: #528610
   * Use 6 as debhelper compatibility level
   * Bump Standards to 3.8.1 (checked, no change)
   * Add lintian overrides
 .
   [ Updated translations ]
   * Asturian (ast.po) by Marcos Alvarez Costales
   * Bengali (bn.po) by Md. Rezwan Shahid
   * German (de.po) by Jens Seidel
   * Esperanto (eo.po) by Felipe Castro
   * Spanish (es.po) by Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
   * Estonian (et.po) by Mattias Põldaru
   * Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide
   * French (fr.po) by Christian Perrier
   * Galician (gl.po) by marce villarino
   * Hindi (hi.po) by Kumar Appaiah
   * Italian (it.po) by Milo Casagrande
   * Kazakh (kk.po) by daur88
   * Malayalam (ml.po) by Praveen Arimbrathodiyil
   * Marathi (mr.po) by Sampada
   * Norwegian Bokmal (nb.po) by Hans Fredrik N

Bug#529475: marked as done (user-setup fails because -m option is no longer valid)

2009-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System

Your message dated Wed, 20 May 2009 11:32:04 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#529475: fixed in user-setup 1.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #529475,
regarding user-setup fails because -m option is no longer valid
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
529475: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=529475
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: user-setup
Version: 1.23
Severity: serious

Apparently chpasswd no longer accepts the -m option!

May 19 14:28:25 finish-install: info: Running 
/usr/lib/finish-install.d/06user-setup
May 19 14:28:26 user-setup: Shadow passwords are now on.
May 19 14:28:26 finish-install: chpasswd: invalid option -- 'm'
May 19 14:28:26 finish-install: Usage: chpasswd [options]

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: user-setup
Source-Version: 1.24

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
user-setup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
user-setup_1.24.dsc
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24.dsc
user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
user-setup_1.24_all.deb
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 529...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Perrier  (supplier of updated user-setup package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 09:40:54 +0200
Source: user-setup
Binary: user-setup-udeb user-setup
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team 
Changed-By: Christian Perrier 
Description: 
 user-setup - Set up initial user and password
 user-setup-udeb - Set up users and passwords (udeb)
Closes: 528610 529475
Changes: 
 user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ Colin Watson ]
   * Be more careful about test arguments in the root_password function, in
 case (for example) the encrypted password string is "!" (thanks, Uli
 Heller; LP: #307443).
 .
   [ Joey Hess ]
   * Add initial user to scanner group, (created by libsane).
 .
   [ Frans Pop ]
   * Remove myself as uploader.
 .
   [ Luk Claes ]
   * Add myself as uploader.
   * Disable root account and activate sudo when there is no root passwd given.
 .
   [ Christian Perrier ]
   * No longer use the "-m" switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
 longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
 libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.
 Closes: #529475
   * Replace chpasswd by usermod to set pre-encrypted passwords.
 Thanks to Jordi Pujol for the patch.
 Closes: #528610
   * Use 6 as debhelper compatibility level
   * Bump Standards to 3.8.1 (checked, no change)
   * Add lintian overrides
 .
   [ Updated translations ]
   * Asturian (ast.po) by Marcos Alvarez Costales
   * Bengali (bn.po) by Md. Rezwan Shahid
   * German (de.po) by Jens Seidel
   * Esperanto (eo.po) by Felipe Castro
   * Spanish (es.po) by Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
   * Estonian (et.po) by Mattias Põldaru
   * Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide
   * French (fr.po) by Christian Perrier
   * Galician (gl.po) by marce villarino
   * Hindi (hi.po) by Kumar Appaiah
   * Italian (it.po) by Milo Casagrande
   * Kazakh (kk.po) by daur88
   * Malayalam (ml.po) by Praveen Arimbrathodiyil
   * Marathi (mr.po) by Sampada
   * Norwegian Bokmal (nb.po) by Hans Fredrik Nordhaug
   * Portuguese (pt.po) by Miguel Figueiredo
   * Russian (ru.po) by Yuri Kozlov
   * Slovak (sk.po) by Ivan Masár
   * Swedish (sv.po) by Daniel Nylander
   * Tagalog (tl.po) by Eric Pareja
Checksums-Sha1: 
 0af565e5fe3354f87d9b2d19cd092a0055620d30 969 user-setup_1.24.dsc
 b114badfff8f9245d67212f3a48c127198baab6c 136867 user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
 16e22cb09be25c78ed8d1b9f7b60a475e06c863e 64 user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
 d6f4ed098736222484fba3013e22e42735b43d95 119298 user-setup_1.24_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 a8fc6bda68d31a4068dbcab085f0ae0a3511f68efe77d5b7cf1f55b8bd67919

Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without warning

2009-05-20 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:45:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> 
> Well, when I reported #528033, something had lost my "bepo" setting
> on upgrade without me doing dpkg-reconfigure console-setup. I assumed
> it was already reported since 527641 said "Package installation overwrites
> /etc/default/console-setup without warning" in its title. Thas was
> consistent with what I saw: /etc/default/console-setup had been
> modified/overwritten without my consent to something that did not match my
> manual configuration. I didn't see how you adressed that by supporting
> empty values... so I reopened the bug.

You are right.  #528033 was completely different problem and it was 
fixed by this:

* Escape commas in Debconf questions.  Thanks to Raphaël Hertzog,
  closes: #528033.

Anton Zinoviev




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



user-setup_1.24_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2009-05-20 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
user-setup_1.24.dsc
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24.dsc
user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
user-setup_1.24_all.deb
  to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24_all.deb


Override entries for your package:
user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb - standard debian-installer
user-setup_1.24.dsc - source misc
user-setup_1.24_all.deb - extra admin

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 528610 529475 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processing of user-setup_1.24_i386.changes

2009-05-20 Thread Archive Administrator
user-setup_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  user-setup_1.24.dsc
  user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
  user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
  user-setup_1.24_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processing of user-setup_1.24_i386.changes

2009-05-20 Thread Archive Administrator
user-setup_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
  user-setup_1.24.dsc
  user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
  user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
  user-setup_1.24_all.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without warning

2009-05-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
notfound 527641 1.35
notfound 527641 1.36
retitle 527641 doesn't support/keep undefined FONT* parameters
close 527641 1.35

On Wed, 20 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> If you have found the bug in versions 1.35 and 1.36, please provide more 
> information: is this reproduced behaviour, how did it occur, what was 
> the contents of the configuration file before and after it was 
> overwriten, etc.

I did this only to reopen the bug. 
 
> > This is the real problem this bug is about... so closing it with this
> > explanation:
> > >* Support unset font in Debconf configurator.  Thanks Dave Witbrodt,
> > >  closes: #527641.
> 
> This documents how I fixed the problem discovered by Dave Witbrodt.  You 
> must have found a completely different problem and thats why I am asking 
> for more information.

Well, when I reported #528033, something had lost my "bepo" setting
on upgrade without me doing dpkg-reconfigure console-setup. I assumed
it was already reported since 527641 said "Package installation overwrites
/etc/default/console-setup without warning" in its title. Thas was
consistent with what I saw: /etc/default/console-setup had been
modified/overwritten without my consent to something that did not match my
manual configuration. I didn't see how you adressed that by supporting
empty values... so I reopened the bug.

Now looking closer, it looks like console-setup's config script feed
the values of the config file in debconf and then reuse those to update
only the corresponding lines. So it's not as bad as I thought it was.

I tried to reproduce the problem but did not manage to do it.

I'll close the bug again.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Contribuez à Debian et gagnez un cahier de l'admin Debian Lenny :
http://www.ouaza.com/wp/2009/03/02/contribuer-a-debian-gagner-un-livre/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without warning

2009-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> notfound 527641 1.35
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without 
warning
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1.35.

> notfound 527641 1.36
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without 
warning
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1.36.

> retitle 527641 doesn't support/keep undefined FONT* parameters
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without 
warning
Changed Bug title to `doesn't support/keep undefined FONT* parameters' from 
`Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without warning'.

> close 527641 1.35
Bug#527641: doesn't support/keep undefined FONT* parameters
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.35, send any further explanations to Dave 
Witbrodt 

> On Wed, 20 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > If you have found the bug in versions 1.35 and 1.36, please provide more
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > information: is this reproduced behaviour, how did it occur, what was
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > the contents of the configuration file before and after it was
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> > overwriten, etc.
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Too many unknown commands, stopping here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without warning

2009-05-20 Thread Anton Zinoviev
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:21:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> found 527641 1.35
> found 527641 1.36
> thanks

If you have found the bug in versions 1.35 and 1.36, please provide more 
information: is this reproduced behaviour, how did it occur, what was 
the contents of the configuration file before and after it was 
overwriten, etc.

> This is the real problem this bug is about... so closing it with this
> explanation:
> >* Support unset font in Debconf configurator.  Thanks Dave Witbrodt,
> >  closes: #527641.

This documents how I fixed the problem discovered by Dave Witbrodt.  You 
must have found a completely different problem and thats why I am asking 
for more information.

> To fix it, you have to:
> 1/ document in the file that it's auto-updated based on the debconf infos
>and that dpkg-reconfigure console-setup is recommended to update it

The use of dpkg-reconfigure is optional.  Console-setup is not supposed 
to overwrite its configuration file.

Anton Zinoviev



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without warning

2009-05-20 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> To fix it, you have to:
> 1/ document in the file that it's auto-updated based on the debconf
> infos and that dpkg-reconfigure console-setup is recommended to update
> it 2/ use ucf or something similar to detect if the file has been
> edited by the user since last generation and avoid overwriting the file
> in that case (ucf like dpkg let the user choose what to do in that
> case)

It sounds like c-s is using debconf as a registry. If that is the case, it 
is just plain wrong. Configuration scripts should read the current 
settings from the configuration file(s) and set the defaults for debconf 
questions based on that, and not just display the current value in the 
debconf database.

From debconf-devel(7):
   [...] The issue  to  watch out  for here is that debconf is not
   intended to be, and must not be used as a registry. This is unix
   after all, and programs are configured by files in /etc, not by
   some nebulous debconf database (that is only a cache anyway and
   might get blown away). [...]

See also the example under "Config file handling" in the same man page.

Cheers,
FJP



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



setting DISKTYPE in debian-cd

2009-05-20 Thread Tenzin Dendup
hi,

I tried setting "export DISKTYPE=CD700" in debian-cd's CONF.sh, but
when i run easy-build.sh to build a CD image, the image size always
remains below 650MB. What could the problem be? I also tried adding
more packages to debian-cd/tasks/lenny/forcd1 (to add more packages in
CD1? - i hope i am right in my understanding of forcd1, please correct
me if i am wrong), but still the size of the CD iso remains below
650MB.

Regards
Tenzin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: First tests with console-setup replacing kbd-config

2009-05-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> Christian Perrier, le Wed 20 May 2009 08:06:55 +0200, a écrit :
> > In low memory mode, translations will be dropped anyway.
> 
> When using templates, yes.  But here translations are included directly
> in the .config script because we need to mangle the answers.


OK, I better understand.

However, the udeb being in the initrd, we need to find a way to drop
it, then replace it with the mini udeb, when entering the low memory
mode. And, of course, at that moment, we don't have any network
available, so that means that the mini udeb also has to be on the
initrd...


Or, is there something I'm missing, somewhere?





signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#529307: installation report

2009-05-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Steven Sciame (sasci...@yahoo.com):
> Hello,
> 
>     Thank you for the reply.  I typed in wireless because that was the ESSID 
> that I wanted to connect to, but it didn't work and without a connection you 
> can only get so far with the install.  It seemed like it would be fine all 
> the way up to the configure wireless network.  
> 
>     I installed Ubuntu and in worked perfectly.  I kind of wanted to use 
> Debian though.  Any suggestions on my next step?


It's fairly hard to tell when the only information you mention is "it
didn't work"..:-)

What exactly did you do at the network configuration step and what
was/were the error message(s)?



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: First tests with console-setup replacing kbd-config

2009-05-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Christian Perrier, le Wed 20 May 2009 08:06:55 +0200, a écrit :
> In low memory mode, translations will be dropped anyway.

When using templates, yes.  But here translations are included directly
in the .config script because we need to mangle the answers.

Samuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without warning

2009-05-20 Thread Raphael Hertzog
found 527641 1.35
found 527641 1.36
thanks

On Fri, 08 May 2009, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
> I have set the severity of this bug report to "serious" because,
> technically, it is a policy violation to overwrite user changes to file
> in /etc;

This is the real problem this bug is about... so closing it with this
explanation:
>* Support unset font in Debconf configurator.  Thanks Dave Witbrodt,
>  closes: #527641.

is not correct.

To fix it, you have to:
1/ document in the file that it's auto-updated based on the debconf infos
   and that dpkg-reconfigure console-setup is recommended to update it
2/ use ucf or something similar to detect if the file has been edited by
   the user since last generation and avoid overwriting the file in that case
   (ucf like dpkg let the user choose what to do in that case)

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Contribuez à Debian et gagnez un cahier de l'admin Debian Lenny :
http://www.ouaza.com/wp/2009/03/02/contribuer-a-debian-gagner-un-livre/



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without warning

2009-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> found 527641 1.35
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without 
warning
Bug marked as found in version 1.35 and reopened.

> found 527641 1.36
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without 
warning
Bug marked as found in version 1.36.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#529574: console-setup: Should not use obsolete dpkg --print-installation-architecture

2009-05-20 Thread Raphaël Hertzog
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.36
Severity: normal

You should not use dpkg --print-installation-architecture otherwise
starting with the upcoming dpkg 1.15.1 you will get annoying warnings like
this:
dpkg: warning: obsolete option '--print-installation-architecture', please
use '--print-architecture' instead.

I see this when console-setup is preconfigured (config script) and
configured (postinst, but might be config script called from postinst).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (150, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages console-setup depends on:
ii  console-terminus  4.28-1 Fixed-width fonts for fast reading
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.26 Debian configuration management sy
ii  xkb-data  1.5-2  X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu

Versions of packages console-setup recommends:
ii  kbd   1.15-1 Linux console font and keytable ut

Versions of packages console-setup suggests:
ii  locales   2.9-12 GNU C Library: National Language (
ii  lsb-base  3.2-22 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip

-- debconf information excluded



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org