Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
snip/
I 've just looked at theme PNGs in Bladr which are referred to by gtkrc
ls -l pixmaps | awk '{system(grep $8 gtkrc /dev/null; if [ $? -eq 0
]; then echo $8 used_png; else echo $8 unused_png; fi)}'
and it turned out that below listed PNGs are *not* referred to by gtkrc.
Luca, are those PNGs really used ? in the case are not, can we remove
them from the tarball to save up some space?
Luca has just confirmed in private the below listed files can be safely
removed from Bladr theme.
cheers
Attilio
arrow_down1.png
arrow_down2.png
arrow_left1.png
arrow_left2.png
arrow_right1.png
arrow_right2.png
arrow_up1.png
arrow_up2.png
blank.png
button1.png
button2.png
button3.png
button4.png
check1.png
check2.png
default.png
ext1.png
ext2.png
menu_background_4.png
menu-item.png
nautilus_back.png
notebook_top_flat_transparent.png
obutton1.png
obutton2.png
option1.png
option2.png
progressbar_3.png
radio1.png
radio2.png
scroll1.png
scroll2.png
scroll3.png
scroll4.png
SelectedTabTop_backup.png
shadow_out.png
spin1.png
spin2.png
spin3.png
toolbar_background.png
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
snip/
I 've just looked at theme PNGs in Bladr which are referred to by gtkrc
ls -l pixmaps | awk '{system(grep $8 gtkrc /dev/null; if [ $? -eq
0 ]; then echo $8 used_png; else echo $8 unused_png; fi)}'
and it turned out that below listed PNGs are *not* referred to by gtkrc.
Luca, are those PNGs really used ? in the case are not, can we remove
them from the tarball to save up some space?
Luca has just confirmed in private the below listed files can be safely
removed from Bladr theme.
I just finished preparing a stripped version of bladr, it can be found here
https://debian.polito.it/downloads/Bladr-stripped-0.1.tgz
Attilio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
Denis Barbier wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:10:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 22 September 2006 15:12, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
I think we may want let icons PNGs in place because this would allow
me to replace the special PNGs used for the error (error_icon.png)
and warning (note_icon.png) questions with PNGs belonging to the
current theme in use (e.g.: stock_cancel.png and stock_apply.png ).
If denis could provide stock_apply.png, stock_cancel.png in
HignContrastLargeInverse too, also the accessibility theme could have
its own nice error and note icons.
I'm not objecting to anything that is used, but please do not include
_anything_ that is not used. It can always be added in later when it is
needed.
I concur, but for a slightly different reason. The primary goal of an
accessibility theme is to be usable by disabled people which could not
use g-i otherwise. This is not a cosmetic issue.
The HignContrastLargePrintInverse theme is usable without those icons,
so I hope that it can be enabled soon. We could make it fancier later,
if we have some free space/memory, but honestly I much prefer having
a not appealing HignContrastLargePrintInverse theme than no theme at
all, this is a first step in the right direction.
ok, i agree not to add unnecesary PNGs to the accessibility GTK theme.
I 've just looked at theme PNGs in Bladr which are referred to by gtkrc
ls -l pixmaps | awk '{system(grep $8 gtkrc /dev/null; if [ $? -eq 0
]; then echo $8 used_png; else echo $8 unused_png; fi)}'
and it turned out that below listed PNGs are *not* referred to by gtkrc.
Luca, are those PNGs really used ? in the case are not, can we remove
them from the tarball to save up some space?
cheers
Attilio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/bladr/usr/share/themes/Bladr/gtk-2.0$ cat unused_png
arrow_down1.png
arrow_down2.png
arrow_left1.png
arrow_left2.png
arrow_right1.png
arrow_right2.png
arrow_up1.png
arrow_up2.png
blank.png
button1.png
button2.png
button3.png
button4.png
check1.png
check2.png
default.png
ext1.png
ext2.png
menu_background_4.png
menu-item.png
nautilus_back.png
notebook_top_flat_transparent.png
obutton1.png
obutton2.png
option1.png
option2.png
progressbar_3.png
radio1.png
radio2.png
scroll1.png
scroll2.png
scroll3.png
scroll4.png
SelectedTabTop_backup.png
shadow_out.png
spin1.png
spin2.png
spin3.png
toolbar_background.png
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Friday 22 September 2006 09:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: any progress in packaging the Bladr and HighContrastLarge GTK themes for g-i ? IIRC it was proposed to pack them into rootskel-gtk package. Yes, I'm working on it. We need some other changes first, but those are in progress. I can finalize after we have a new fontconfig upload. Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball actually used? Could any of them be left out? pgpLG3GSrIjhF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
Frans Pop scrisse: Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball actually used? Could any of them be left out? IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but first I need to see which icons and pixmaps are needed by the new graphical partitioner. Cheers, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno : :' : The Universal O.S.| luca.br(AT)uno.it `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Proud Debian GNU/Linux User pgp25945yqtTK.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Friday 22 September 2006 14:39, Luca Bruno wrote: Frans Pop scrisse: Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball actually used? Could any of them be left out? IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but first I need to see which icons and pixmaps are needed by the new graphical partitioner. There will be no graphical partitioner for Etch, so you only need to take the current situation into account. Please strip down the theme as far as possible. TIA, Frans pgpSd6xIFsw6D.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 22 September 2006 09:42, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: any progress in packaging the Bladr and HighContrastLarge GTK themes for g-i ? IIRC it was proposed to pack them into rootskel-gtk package. Yes, I'm working on it. We need some other changes first, but those are in progress. I can finalize after we have a new fontconfig upload. Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball actually used? Could any of them be left out? Talking about bladr, i see almost all PNGs in the pixmap directory are needed, while only some in the icons directory are (but they are few and small when compared to those in the pixmap directory). I think we may want let icons PNGs in place because this would allow me to replace the special PNGs used for the error (error_icon.png) and warning (note_icon.png) questions with PNGs belonging to the current theme in use (e.g.: stock_cancel.png and stock_apply.png ). If denis could provide stock_apply.png, stock_cancel.png in HignContrastLargeInverse too, also the accessibility theme could have its own nice error and note icons. Attilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 22 September 2006 14:39, Luca Bruno wrote: Frans Pop scrisse: Question: are all the PNGs currently included in your tarball actually used? Could any of them be left out? IIRC there are still some of them which can be stripped down, but first I need to see which icons and pixmaps are needed by the new graphical partitioner. There will be no graphical partitioner for Etch, so you only need to take the current situation into account. Please strip down the theme as far as possible. I don't know how the filesystem used for g-i ISOs performs with small files, but i noticed ext3 needs to allocate ~230 KBs of space for the whole theme, when the files provided by the theme are only ~130 KB. Attilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Friday 22 September 2006 15:12, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: I think we may want let icons PNGs in place because this would allow me to replace the special PNGs used for the error (error_icon.png) and warning (note_icon.png) questions with PNGs belonging to the current theme in use (e.g.: stock_cancel.png and stock_apply.png ). If denis could provide stock_apply.png, stock_cancel.png in HignContrastLargeInverse too, also the accessibility theme could have its own nice error and note icons. I'm not objecting to anything that is used, but please do not include _anything_ that is not used. It can always be added in later when it is needed. Memory is valuable in the installer. Don't waste it! pgpd1NlWINXXq.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 04:10:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 22 September 2006 15:12, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: I think we may want let icons PNGs in place because this would allow me to replace the special PNGs used for the error (error_icon.png) and warning (note_icon.png) questions with PNGs belonging to the current theme in use (e.g.: stock_cancel.png and stock_apply.png ). If denis could provide stock_apply.png, stock_cancel.png in HignContrastLargeInverse too, also the accessibility theme could have its own nice error and note icons. I'm not objecting to anything that is used, but please do not include _anything_ that is not used. It can always be added in later when it is needed. I concur, but for a slightly different reason. The primary goal of an accessibility theme is to be usable by disabled people which could not use g-i otherwise. This is not a cosmetic issue. The HignContrastLargePrintInverse theme is usable without those icons, so I hope that it can be enabled soon. We could make it fancier later, if we have some free space/memory, but honestly I much prefer having a not appealing HignContrastLargePrintInverse theme than no theme at all, this is a first step in the right direction. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:20:28PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: Hi Luca Bruno has just finished polishing up his nice Bladr GTK+ theme, that i propose as default GTK theme for use in the g-i. A tarball can be found here [1] and i suggest (at least for the short period) to package Bladr in the rootskel-gtk theme like it was proposed to do for the GTK accessibility theme by Denis. An issue arises: to make GTKDFB able to load PNGs for themes, the pixmap loading library must be provided, like the package gtk2-engines-pixmap does on a regular debian system by providing libpixmap.so on a X GTK target. I guess this issue has to be managed by the gtk-gnome-team, should we ask them to provide a .udeb containing the libpixmap.so engine only ? I suppose the only reason why we should not, would be if libpixmap would be a huge library, right ? i looked at its size, and i found libpixmap.so to be ~32 KB. Bladr is instead much bigger, it's about 215 KB big, so total space required on installation ISO by both the gtk theme and the engine library wil be roughly 250KB. Attilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
Frans Pop wrote: On Saturday 16 September 2006 21:20, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: Luca Bruno has just finished polishing up his nice Bladr GTK+ theme, that i propose as default GTK theme for use in the g-i. Could you provide some screenshots? IMO the look of the theme should be approved first, at least by the team. Here is a screenshot [1] of what Bladr looks like (very nice, IMHO :) and there is also a *very* old ISO [2] i made that includes Bladr theme. How is the theme copyrighted? Luca built Bladr taking inspiration from already GPL'ed GTK themes, and the Bladr itself is reeased as GPL (as stated into the gtkrc configuration file) A tarball can be found here [1] and i suggest (at least for the short period) to package Bladr in the rootskel-gtk theme like it was proposed to do for the GTK accessibility theme by Denis. I suppose: s/rootskel-gtk theme/rootskel-gtk udeb/ Of course! I see that the total size of the theme is ~500 kB. I guess that is acceptable, though it is very much not negligible. Are all included files really needed? The biggest file provided by the tarball is the gtkrc file (~32 KB), and PNGs for widget surfaces do the rest. PNGs are indeed big, but maybe they could be compressed some more to save up a little extra space. An issue arises: to make GTKDFB able to load PNGs for themes, the pixmap loading library must be provided, like the package gtk2-engines-pixmap does on a regular debian system by providing libpixmap.so on a X GTK target. I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/ Again right :) Have you checked the dependencies of that lib (i.e. does it depend on other libs we currently do not have)? The lib itself is ~30kB, so not really a problem. I think libpixmap.so has no broken dependencies: a ldd run is reported below. I guess this issue has to be managed by the gtk-gnome-team, should we ask them to provide a .udeb containing the libpixmap.so engine only ? Please answer the questions above first. Cheers, FJP cheers Attilio [1] https://debian.polito.it/downloads/udebs/d-i_gtkdfb2.9_bladr.png [2] https://debian.polito.it/downloads/udebs/mini.iso [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gtkdfb/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines$ ldd libpixmap.so linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 = /home/attilio/gtkdfb/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0xa7fe6000) libpango-1.0.so.0 = /home/attilio/gtkdfb/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0xa7fa5000) libatk-1.0.so.0 = /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0xa7f77000) libgobject-2.0.so.0 = /home/attilio/gtkdfb/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0xa7f3e000) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 = /home/attilio/gtkdfb/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0xa7f3b000) libdl.so.2 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xa7f36000) libglib-2.0.so.0 = /home/attilio/gtkdfb/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0xa7ea4000) libcairo.so.2 = /home/attilio/gtkdfb/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0xa7e2f000) libm.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xa7e0a000) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 = /home/attilio/gtkdfb/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0xa7df4000) libgdk-directfb-2.0.so.0 = /home/attilio/gtkdfb/lib/libgdk-directfb-2.0.so.0 (0xa7d88000) libgtk-directfb-2.0.so.0 = /home/attilio/gtkdfb/lib/libgtk-directfb-2.0.so.0 (0xa7a0f000) libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xa78de000) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 = /home/attilio/gtkdfb/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0xa78aa000) libfontconfig.so.1 = /usr/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0xa787a000) libfreetype.so.6 = /usr/lib/libfreetype.so.6 (0xa781) libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xa77fc000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x7000) libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 = /usr/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 (0xa77a4000) libfusion-0.9.so.25 = /usr/lib/libfusion-0.9.so.25 (0xa779e000) libdirect-0.9.so.25 = /usr/lib/libdirect-0.9.so.25 (0xa779) libpthread.so.0 = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xa777e000) libpng12.so.0 = /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0xa775a000) libexpat.so.1 = /usr/lib/libexpat.so.1 (0xa773a000) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
Loïc Minier wrote: On Sat, Sep 16, 2006, Frans Pop wrote: I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/ I think it's gtk2-engines-pixbuf which has /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libpixmap.so and is 32K. Here are the ELF deps of the directfb flavor: bee% objdump -x usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libpixmap.so | grep NEED NEEDED libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 NEEDED libfusion-0.9.so.25 NEEDED libdirect-0.9.so.25 NEEDED libpthread.so.0 NEEDED libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 NEEDED libpango-1.0.so.0 NEEDED libatk-1.0.so.0 NEEDED libgobject-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libgmodule-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libdl.so.2 NEEDED libglib-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libcairo.so.2 NEEDED libm.so.6 NEEDED libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libgdk-directfb-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libgtk-directfb-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libc.so.6 AFAIK, all the needed libraries by libpixmap are already provided by some existing udeb. Cheers Attilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/ Again right :) For the record, that's a GTK+ 1.2 engine package. -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Sunday 17 September 2006 11:41, Loïc Minier wrote: On Sun, Sep 17, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/ Again right :) For the record, that's a GTK+ 1.2 engine package. My error. I did not read the output of my search on p.d.o correctly because of the section change between the packages: usr/lib/gtk/themes/engines/libpixmap.so x11/gtk-engines-pixmap usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libpixmap.so graphics/gtk2-engines-pixbuf So, the correct correction should have been: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/ ;-) Anyway, all fairly irrelevant as the lib can just be included in the existing udeb. pgpw5XxxWmytc.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
There is starting a discussion on debian-desktop for artwork for debian, regarding etch and etch+1 [0]. It would be nice if the debian installer come with the same theme (layout, colour scheme). Just to let you know. [0] = http://wiki.debian.org/DebianDesktopArtwork Dom, 2006-09-17 às 12:04 +0200, Frans Pop escreveu: On Sunday 17 September 2006 11:41, Loïc Minier wrote: On Sun, Sep 17, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/ Again right :) For the record, that's a GTK+ 1.2 engine package. My error. I did not read the output of my search on p.d.o correctly because of the section change between the packages: usr/lib/gtk/themes/engines/libpixmap.so x11/gtk-engines-pixmap usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.4.0/engines/libpixmap.so graphics/gtk2-engines-pixbuf So, the correct correction should have been: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk2-engines-pixbuf/ ;-) Anyway, all fairly irrelevant as the lib can just be included in the existing udeb. -- Best Regards, -- Luis Matos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 09:20:28PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: Hi Luca Bruno has just finished polishing up his nice Bladr GTK+ theme, that i propose as default GTK theme for use in the g-i. A tarball can be found here [1] and i suggest (at least for the short period) to package Bladr in the rootskel-gtk theme like it was proposed to do for the GTK accessibility theme by Denis. An issue arises: to make GTKDFB able to load PNGs for themes, the pixmap loading library must be provided, like the package gtk2-engines-pixmap does on a regular debian system by providing libpixmap.so on a X GTK target. I guess this issue has to be managed by the gtk-gnome-team, should we ask them to provide a .udeb containing the libpixmap.so engine only ? I suppose the only reason why we should not, would be if libpixmap would be a huge library, right ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Saturday 16 September 2006 21:20, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: Luca Bruno has just finished polishing up his nice Bladr GTK+ theme, that i propose as default GTK theme for use in the g-i. Could you provide some screenshots? IMO the look of the theme should be approved first, at least by the team. How is the theme copyrighted? A tarball can be found here [1] and i suggest (at least for the short period) to package Bladr in the rootskel-gtk theme like it was proposed to do for the GTK accessibility theme by Denis. I suppose: s/rootskel-gtk theme/rootskel-gtk udeb/ I see that the total size of the theme is ~500 kB. I guess that is acceptable, though it is very much not negligible. Are all included files really needed? An issue arises: to make GTKDFB able to load PNGs for themes, the pixmap loading library must be provided, like the package gtk2-engines-pixmap does on a regular debian system by providing libpixmap.so on a X GTK target. I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/ Have you checked the dependencies of that lib (i.e. does it depend on other libs we currently do not have)? The lib itself is ~30kB, so not really a problem. I guess this issue has to be managed by the gtk-gnome-team, should we ask them to provide a .udeb containing the libpixmap.so engine only ? Please answer the questions above first. Cheers, FJP pgpVeJeRG6OaF.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: An issue arises: to make GTKDFB able to load PNGs for themes, the pixmap loading library must be provided, like the package gtk2-engines-pixmap does on a regular debian system by providing libpixmap.so on a X GTK target. I guess this issue has to be managed by the gtk-gnome-team, should we ask them to provide a .udeb containing the libpixmap.so engine only ? I've added engines/libpixmap.so to the udeb in our SVN, it will part of the next upload to experimental. The udeb already had the png loading backend (loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so). Must this file be split in a separate udeb as in the archive? I also checked whether the engine can be built in the shared library itself (as with the AC_ARG_WITH(included_loaders) which permits inclusion of the loaders in the shared lib), but that doesn't seem possible. -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006, Frans Pop wrote: I suppose: s/gtk2-engines-pixmap/gtk-engines-pixmap/ I think it's gtk2-engines-pixbuf which has /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libpixmap.so and is 32K. Here are the ELF deps of the directfb flavor: bee% objdump -x usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libpixmap.so | grep NEED NEEDED libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 NEEDED libfusion-0.9.so.25 NEEDED libdirect-0.9.so.25 NEEDED libpthread.so.0 NEEDED libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 NEEDED libpango-1.0.so.0 NEEDED libatk-1.0.so.0 NEEDED libgobject-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libgmodule-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libdl.so.2 NEEDED libglib-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libcairo.so.2 NEEDED libm.so.6 NEEDED libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libgdk-directfb-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libgtk-directfb-2.0.so.0 NEEDED libc.so.6 -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
Hi Loïc, Thanks for the quick reaction. On Saturday 16 September 2006 23:15, Loïc Minier wrote: Must this file be split in a separate udeb as in the archive? No, I see no reason to have it in a separate udeb if it can be added to the existing one. We may want the pending changes for experimental (this one and the fix for #382435) in current 2.8.x too. Would that be possible? No need to upload right now; just want to know if an upload to unstable would be possible. pgpc29Nay1vsW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bladr GTK theme for g-i ready for packaging
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006, Frans Pop wrote:
We may want the pending changes for experimental (this one and the fix for
#382435) in current 2.8.x too.
Would that be possible? No need to upload right now; just want to know if
an upload to unstable would be possible.
Yes, it would be possible. In 2.10, the package use proper debhelper
install files, so it was trivial, and in 2.8 it's a matter of updating:
rm -rf $(UDEB_PKGDIR)/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/*/{engines,immodules}
... but I didn't change the 2.8 package yet.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
