Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)
Hi! On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 16:10:44 +, Robert Millan wrote: Guillem Jover: I'll look into updating to latest upstream preserving the current support, hopefully in the coming days, been a bit busy lately, sorry! That's what you said in July! :-) Indeed, and to be honest, one (but certainly not the only) of the reasons I've been setting this aside, is because having to deal with subversion is such a pain that, I've been finding other stuff to do. I've now done a git-svn clone so that I can work with something saner, and I'd put the repo in the project git space, so that others can use it and do not need to do the initial conversion too, but I seem to have lost the admin bit recently, so I guess I'll put it somewhere else. But please take no offense. I'm sure you've been busy, and I think we need to be honest with ourselves here. Maintaining this port takes a lot of effort and the ufsutils GNU/Linux patchset is an extra burden that makes it lag behind in almost every release. So please understand that my aim is not to assign blame, but to find solutions. Given that pristine source from upstream is already buildable and usable, my solution would be to move GNU/Linux support aside until/unless someone cares enough about it to get the patchset in a mergeable state and submit it upstream. That's my solution but it's just a proposal, it doesn't have to be the one we apply. So what's the solution you have in mind? How do you see this problem being solved in the long term? I've started patching the code against 9.2, there's some new stuff broken on GNU/Linux, I guess I'll dedicate few days, and if it snowballs too much, then I'll just restrict to kfreebsd-any for now. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131009060550.ga32...@gaara.hadrons.org
glibc-bsd svn repository git mirror
Hi! I've pushed a git mirror of the svn repo to alioth, which in theory should get updated on each svn commit, that can be used either to just track the svn repository using read-only git: git://anonscm.debian.org/users/guillem/glibc-bsd.git http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/guillem/glibc-bsd.git or to bootstrap a git-svn local repo, using the following script: http://alioth.debian.org/~guillem/git-clone-glibc-bsd after that you can use the normal git-svn workflow (please check the man page). Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131009201659.ga9...@gaara.hadrons.org
Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)
Guillem Jover: I've now done a git-svn clone so that I can work with something saner, and I'd put the repo in the project git space, so that others can use it and do not need to do the initial conversion too, but I seem to have lost the admin bit recently, so I guess I'll put it somewhere else. What do you need it for? (other than unilaterally migrating the official repository to git) I've started patching the code against 9.2, there's some new stuff broken on GNU/Linux, I guess I'll dedicate few days, and if it snowballs too much, then I'll just restrict to kfreebsd-any for now. I'm glad to see you're making progress. If you find that this path can take too long, please let us know so that alternatives can be used in the meantime (at least temporarily). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5255c18b.1020...@debian.org
Re: Bug#725304: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.5
Adam D. Barratt: There is a 9.0-10+deb70.4 upload in Secre^WSecurity Team's queue since 23 days ago but I've no idea the status if this. [rt.debian.org #4671] In that case, the status of that package needs clarifying. Releasing .5 via p-u if .4 is then going to appear via security doesn't really work. .4 just went into proposed-updates. Does this address your concerns? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5255c37d.8040...@debian.org
Re: Bug#725304: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.5
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 20:58 +, Robert Millan wrote: Adam D. Barratt: There is a 9.0-10+deb70.4 upload in Secre^WSecurity Team's queue since 23 days ago but I've no idea the status if this. [rt.debian.org #4671] In that case, the status of that package needs clarifying. Releasing .5 via p-u if .4 is then going to appear via security doesn't really work. .4 just went into proposed-updates. No. It's in wheezy-security, but it's _not_ in proposed-updates because it reached pu-NEW after the window for 7.2 closed. Does this address your concerns? Yes, thanks. Please feel free to upload; the package will then be processed after the point release. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1381354276.29291.39.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Processing of freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes
freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-1.dsc freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1.orig.tar.gz freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-1.debian.tar.gz libsbuf6_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libsbuf6-udeb_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libsbuf-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libdwarf-freebsd-3_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libdwarf-freebsd-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libelf-freebsd-1_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libelf-freebsd-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libcam6_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libcam-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom1_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libgeom1-udeb_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libusbhid4debian_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusbhid-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2debian_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusb2debian-udeb_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libkvm0_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libkvm-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libdevstat7_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libdevstat-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libmemstat3_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libmemstat-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libnetgraph4_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libnetgraph-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx2_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libipx2-udeb_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb libkiconv4_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libkiconv-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libjail1_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libjail-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libalias7_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libalias-dev_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb libusbhid-common_9.2+ds1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vu1s7-0003cd...@franck.debian.org
freebsd-libs_9.2+ds1-1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes is NEW
binary:libelf-freebsd-dev is NEW. binary:libdwarf-freebsd-dev is NEW. binary:libelf-freebsd-1 is NEW. binary:libdwarf-freebsd-3 is NEW. Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vu25z-0005uy...@franck.debian.org
Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)
On 09/10/13 21:50, Robert Millan wrote: Guillem Jover: I've now done a git-svn clone so that I can work with something saner, and I'd put the repo in the project git space, so that others can use it and do not need to do the initial conversion too, but I seem to have lost the admin bit recently, so I guess I'll put it somewhere else. What do you need it for? (other than unilaterally migrating the official repository to git) It's useful for offline change tracking and such, even if the official packaging repository doesn't use it. (I'd still prefer to stay with SVN, unless FreeBSD switch to Git and can demonstrate it working well). Using Git on top of checked-out CVS trees seems to be a popular workflow. It sounds like the best of both worlds; Git for offline and distributed working, and a more traditional linear VCS like SVN for the master repository. Having a single 'official' git-svn repository like Guillem's makes it easier for Git users to share things with each other, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5255dafd.7030...@pyro.eu.org
Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)
Hi! On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 20:50:19 +, Robert Millan wrote: Guillem Jover: I've now done a git-svn clone so that I can work with something saner, and I'd put the repo in the project git space, so that others can use it and do not need to do the initial conversion too, but I seem to have lost the admin bit recently, so I guess I'll put it somewhere else. What do you need it for? I'd have needed it to enable git for the project, and to create a git repo for the bi-directional bridge, so that people who want to keep using svn can do so, and anyone else that want to use git, can use the bi-directional git-svn repo, from a better place than my home on alioth. But I guess the current location work fine so. (other than unilaterally migrating the official repository to git) Uh, that would have never even crossed my mind… Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131009224830.ga4...@gaara.hadrons.org
Access to a kfreebsd build machine
Hi. I'm the maintainer of the tcpflow package. I'd like to fix this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725660 I don't have access to a kfreebsd box, and I had some issues setting one up in emulation. I'm not yet a DM, so would anybody be willing to sponsor me to get temporary access to a debian build machine so that I can look into this? The procedure is described here: http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/ I'll send to the request with all the required pieces to whoever replies to this. Thanks dima -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871u3u5as9@secretsauce.net
Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)
Guillem Jover: I'd have needed it to enable git for the project, and to create a git repo for the bi-directional bridge, so that people who want to keep using svn can do so, and anyone else that want to use git, can use the bi-directional git-svn repo, from a better place than my home on alioth. But I guess the current location work fine so. I'm not specially fond of this kind of proposals coming from people who are not actively involved with the port, but if it's useful in general and it doesn't prevent me from using SVN I have no objection with it. I suggest we wait a few days to see if everyone else is okay with this. (other than unilaterally migrating the official repository to git) Uh, that would have never even crossed my mind… It's what you said initially. I'm glad it was just a missunderstanding. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5255e5dc.4020...@debian.org
Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (2013-10-09): I'm not specially fond of this kind of proposals coming from people who are not actively involved with the port, but if it's useful in general and it doesn't prevent me from using SVN I have no objection with it. I suggest we wait a few days to see if everyone else is okay with this. I'm not sure why you think it could *not* be OK. Having to git svn clone a repository usually takes forever, so sharing that part is a big if not huge win for anyone not wanting to deal with svn directly. And since that doesn't interfere with people wanting to keep on using svn directly, why would that matter at all? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#725304: pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.5
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 22:12 +, Robert Millan wrote: Adam D. Barratt: In that case, the status of that package needs clarifying. Releasing .5 via p-u if .4 is then going to appear via security doesn't really work. .4 just went into proposed-updates. No. It's in wheezy-security, but it's _not_ in proposed-updates because it reached pu-NEW after the window for 7.2 closed. Uhm sorry then, I got confused by e1vtrz5-0001cf...@franck.debian.org which said otherwise. Ah, I see the confusion. Although it's not obvious from the body, the subject says kfreebsd-9_9.0-10+deb70.4_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates-stable-new, with the -stable-new indicating it's not gone to p-u directly. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1381379974.29291.48.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: ufsutils experiment (please comment/test)
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 23:25:16 +, Robert Millan wrote: Guillem Jover: I'd have needed it to enable git for the project, and to create a git repo for the bi-directional bridge, so that people who want to keep using svn can do so, and anyone else that want to use git, can use the bi-directional git-svn repo, from a better place than my home on alioth. But I guess the current location work fine so. I'm not specially fond of this kind of proposals coming from people who are not actively involved with the port, Is that directed at me? I've most probably not been as active as I previously was, but I've considered myself active in the port… but perhaps I should reconsider. but if it's useful in general and it doesn't prevent me from using SVN I have no objection with it. I suggest we wait a few days to see if everyone else is okay with this. I have the feeling you might have jumped to conclusions on the purpose of the the git-svn repository. But anyway, the git mirror is already public and synced from svn, so it's already useful and helpful for whoever else wants to use git-svn, besides me. And to be honest at this point I don't think I can be bothered to move the setup somewhere else, so I don't see what needs to be waited for anyway. (other than unilaterally migrating the official repository to git) Uh, that would have never even crossed my mind… It's what you said initially. I'm glad it was just a missunderstanding. Eh, I don't see where I've said anything like that, certainly not on this thread, nor on the new post about the git mirror nor on the previous RFC thread… Regards, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131010044401.ga10...@gaara.hadrons.org
