Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!
2012/5/3 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: Not it's a mistake, I don't know how I managed that. I am going to fix that in an upload today. Thanks! Christoph, I made a list of packages that might improve somewhat if they're rebuilt with libc0.1-dev = 2.13-32. Please consider scheduling rebuilds for: autodir cegui-mk2 db db4.7 db4.8 db5.3 dbus eclipse-cdt efax-gtk fpc glib2.0 latrace libprelude libpthread-workqueue libtango ltp miredo Thanks! -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXO351SN6WRRnQ-7pU36hc_y8tTneG=q+8nsg9-fefq...@mail.gmail.com
Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!
2012/5/1 Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org: Are you sure this is correct? It seems to me that this can be a big problem if those packages migrate to testing before eglibc does. Not it's a mistake, I don't know how I managed that. I am going to fix that in an upload today. Thanks! -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmuq9fnklyktqbpwih0_unou6jbtp8eh+cg0qtokmu...@mail.gmail.com
Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:24:30PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: 2012/4/22 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 = 2.13-31. VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE: if this patch is introduced in a later version (rather than 2.13-31), you MUST change the version in debian/libc0.1.symbols.common to the first version that provides pthread_condattr_*etclock on GNU/kFreeBSD. Uhm, I notice you didn't include this part. Now packages that build with libc0.1-dev 2.13-31 won't have a versioned dependency on libc0.1 = 2.13-31. Are you sure this is correct? It seems to me that this can be a big problem if those packages migrate to testing before eglibc does. Not it's a mistake, I don't know how I managed that. I am going to fix that in an upload today. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120501103310.gk22...@hall.aurel32.net
Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!
2012/4/22 Robert Millan r...@debian.org: I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 = 2.13-31. VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE: if this patch is introduced in a later version (rather than 2.13-31), you MUST change the version in debian/libc0.1.symbols.common to the first version that provides pthread_condattr_*etclock on GNU/kFreeBSD. Uhm, I notice you didn't include this part. Now packages that build with libc0.1-dev 2.13-31 won't have a versioned dependency on libc0.1 = 2.13-31. Are you sure this is correct? It seems to me that this can be a big problem if those packages migrate to testing before eglibc does. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxn33lcn-bmsfefx3k7y_waw8d2vd5obxpzbdy8hfmw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!
El 22 d’abril de 2012 17:08, Aurelien Jarno aure...@debian.org ha escrit: I have been mostly away from Debian stuff in the last weeks due to moving, but i'll try to catchup with glibc stuff during the next days and schedule an upload for the middle of the week. Good to hear, thanks. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxmxpmzu1gv_z+bdoq_ooxsm+d3qc3gui-esrnrwfyx...@mail.gmail.com
Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 03:11:35PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: Hi, Hi, I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency part. I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 = 2.13-31. VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE: if this patch is introduced in a later version (rather than 2.13-31), you MUST change the version in debian/libc0.1.symbols.common to the first version that provides pthread_condattr_*etclock on GNU/kFreeBSD. Please could you give an estimate on when you'll be able to include it in glibc? This issue is currently blocking libsoup2.4 builds (see #663056). It does also have a major impact on other programs that use glib (see #667686). Also, the other fixes already committed to pkg-glibc are also quite important, as they are also blocking RC bugs in other packages. If you're all busy and can't prepare an upload right now, please say it so the package be NMUed. I have been mostly away from Debian stuff in the last weeks due to moving, but i'll try to catchup with glibc stuff during the next days and schedule an upload for the middle of the week. There are other important bugs not related to kfreebsd to handle. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120422150828.ga22...@hall.aurel32.net
