Bug#756154: RM: v4l-utils [kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386] -- ANAIS; Upstream dropped support for V4L utilities on kFreeBSD
On Saturday, July 26, 2014 21:14:55 Gregor Jasny wrote: Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Please remove the binary packages v4l-utils, qv4l2, dvb-tools, ir-keytable on [kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386]. There are significant rdepends that will have to be dealt with first. Please remove the moreinfo tag once these are addressed: Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: gambas3: gambas3-gb-v4l kamerka: kamerka libvideo-capture-v4l-perl: libvideo-capture-v4l-perl v4l2loopback: v4l2loopback-utils vgrabbj: vgrabbj visp: libvisp-dev # Broken Build-Depends: amsn: libv4l-dev camorama: libv4l-dev dov4l: libv4l-dev (= 0.8.5) dv4l: libv4l-dev ekiga: libv4l-dev fotowall: libv4l-dev fswebcam: libv4l-dev gambas3: libv4l-dev gem: libv4l-dev gmerlin: libv4l-dev gnomeradio: libv4l-dev gst-plugins-good0.10: libv4l-dev gst-plugins-good1.0: libv4l-dev guvcview: libv4l-dev italc: libv4l-dev kamerka: libv4l-dev kino: libv4l-dev kopete: libv4l-dev libvideo-capture-v4l-perl: libv4l-dev linphone: libv4l-dev lives: libv4l-dev motion: libv4l-dev opencv: libv4l-dev pdp: libv4l-dev phonon-backend-vlc: libv4l-dev player: libv4l-dev ptlib: libv4l-dev qutecom: libv4l-dev sane-backends: libv4l-dev sitplus: libv4l-dev squeak-plugins-scratch: libv4l-dev (= 0.5.8) unicap: libv4l-dev v4l2ucp: libv4l-dev vgrabbj: libv4l-dev visp: libv4l-dev vlc: libv4l-dev w3cam: libv4l-dev wmtv: libv4l-dev wxastrocapture: libv4l-dev xawtv: libv4l-dev xine-lib-1.2: libv4l-dev zbar: libv4l-dev zoneminder: libv4l-dev (= 0.8.3) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#756286: linuxinfo: [INTL:fr] French templates translation
Package: linuxinfo Version: N/A Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Hi! Please find attached the french templates translation, proofread by the debian-l10n-french mailing list contributors. This file should be put as debian/po/fr.po in your package build tree. Kind Regards jipege # translation of linuxinfo.pot to French # Copyright (C) YEAR Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de # This file is distributed under the same license as the linuxinfo package. # # Jean-Pierre Giraud jean-pierregir...@neuf.fr, 2014. msgid msgstr Project-Id-Version: linuxinfo 1.9.1\n Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de\n POT-Creation-Date: 2013-12-06 21:10+0100\n PO-Revision-Date: 2014-07-19 10:41+0200\n Last-Translator: Jean-Pierre Giraud jean-pierregir...@neuf.fr\n Language-Team: French debian-l10n-fre...@lists.debian.org\n Language: fr\n MIME-Version: 1.0\n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n 1);\n X-Generator: Lokalize 1.5\n #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Unknown msgstr Inconnu #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid One msgstr Un #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Two msgstr Deux #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Three msgstr Trois #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Four msgstr Quatre #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Five msgstr Cinq #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Six msgstr Six #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Seven msgstr Sept #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Eight msgstr Huit #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Nine msgstr Neuf #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Ten msgstr Dix #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Eleven msgstr Onze #: linuxinfo.c:50 msgid Twelve msgstr Douze #: linuxinfo.c:74 #, c-format msgid -h print this help\n msgstr -h afficher l'aide\n #: linuxinfo.c:75 #, c-format msgid -v print linuxinfo version\n msgstr -v afficher la version de linuxinfo\n #: linuxinfo.c:82 #, c-format msgid Unsupported option or file %s not found.\n msgstr Option non prise en charge ou fichier %s non trouvé.\n #: linuxinfo.c:91 #, c-format msgid Could not open %s.\n msgstr Ne peut pas ouvrir %s.\n #: linuxinfo.c:115 #, c-format msgid processor msgid_plural processors msgstr[0] processeur msgstr[1] processeurs #: linuxinfo.c:116 #, c-format msgid , %s total bogomips, %sM RAM\n msgstr , %s BogoMips au total, %sM de RAM #: linuxinfo.c:123 #, c-format msgid System library %s\n msgstr Bibliothèque système %s\n #: linuxinfo_common.c:137 #, c-format msgid Could not stat /proc/meminfo, result can be inaccurate\n msgstr Ne peut pas évaluer /proc/meminfo, le résultat peut être inexact\n
Bug#756287: apt-utils: Allow to generate contents only
Package: apt-utils
Version: 1.0.4
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Blast from the past, mvo wrote in 2012 a patch to allow apt-ftparchive
generate command to perform Contents update only, however that patch
does not seem to have been applied yet. [1] [2]
I've now rebased it, and tested it to make sure it does provide a
speed-up gain for generating Contents on large repositories, without the
penalty of re-generating dists.
Please consider applying that patch, see attachment.
From 0060b95d981d7f1ef36a6177f39cc40e96961c3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dimitri John Ledkov x...@ubuntu.com
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 16:06:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Make Packages Sources generation optional, during Generate
call
refactor a bit, extract code out of Generate() into
DoGenerate{PackagesAndSources,Contents}, add new
APT::FTPArchive::ContentsOnly option to allow skipping the generation
of Package/Source files (if they are generated e.g. by some db outside
of apt-ftparchives control)
---
ftparchive/apt-ftparchive.cc | 99 +---
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ftparchive/apt-ftparchive.cc b/ftparchive/apt-ftparchive.cc
index ba71ee2..ebf99a8 100644
--- a/ftparchive/apt-ftparchive.cc
+++ b/ftparchive/apt-ftparchive.cc
@@ -781,33 +781,14 @@ static bool SimpleGenRelease(CommandLine CmdL)
}
/*}}}*/
-// Generate - Full generate, using a config file /*{{{*/
+// DoGeneratePackagesAndSources - Helper for Generate /*{{{*/
// -
-/* */
-static bool Generate(CommandLine CmdL)
+static bool DoGeneratePackagesAndSources(Configuration Setup,
+ vectorPackageMap PkgList,
+ struct CacheDB::Stats SrcStats,
+ struct CacheDB::Stats Stats,
+ CommandLine CmdL)
{
- struct CacheDB::Stats SrcStats;
- if (CmdL.FileSize() 2)
- return ShowHelp(CmdL);
-
- struct timeval StartTime;
- gettimeofday(StartTime,0);
- struct CacheDB::Stats Stats;
-
- // Read the configuration file.
- Configuration Setup;
- if (ReadConfigFile(Setup,CmdL.FileList[1],true) == false)
- return false;
-
- vectorPackageMap PkgList;
- LoadTree(PkgList,Setup);
- LoadBinDir(PkgList,Setup);
-
- // Sort by cache DB to improve IO locality.
- stable_sort(PkgList.begin(),PkgList.end(),PackageMap::DBCompare());
- stable_sort(PkgList.begin(),PkgList.end(),PackageMap::SrcDBCompare());
-
- // Generate packages
if (CmdL.FileSize() = 2)
{
for (vectorPackageMap::iterator I = PkgList.begin(); I != PkgList.end(); ++I)
@@ -876,9 +857,16 @@ static bool Generate(CommandLine CmdL)
if (I-TransWriter != NULL I-TransWriter-DecreaseRefCounter() == 0)
delete I-TransWriter;
- if (_config-FindB(APT::FTPArchive::Contents,true) == false)
- return true;
-
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*}}}*/
+// DoGenerateContents - Helper for Generate to generate the Contents/*{{{*/
+// -
+static bool DoGenerateContents(Configuration Setup,
+ vectorPackageMap PkgList,
+ CommandLine CmdL)
+{
c1out Packages done, Starting contents. endl;
// Sort the contents file list by date
@@ -935,17 +923,62 @@ static bool Generate(CommandLine CmdL)
break;
}
}
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+ /*}}}*/
+// Generate - Full generate, using a config file /*{{{*/
+// -
+/* */
+static bool Generate(CommandLine CmdL)
+{
+ struct CacheDB::Stats SrcStats;
+ if (CmdL.FileSize() 2)
+ return ShowHelp(CmdL);
+
+ struct timeval StartTime;
+ gettimeofday(StartTime,0);
+ struct CacheDB::Stats Stats;
+ // Read the configuration file.
+ Configuration Setup;
+ if (ReadConfigFile(Setup,CmdL.FileList[1],true) == false)
+ return false;
+
+ vectorPackageMap PkgList;
+ LoadTree(PkgList,Setup);
+ LoadBinDir(PkgList,Setup);
+
+ // Sort by cache DB to improve IO locality.
+ stable_sort(PkgList.begin(),PkgList.end(),PackageMap::DBCompare());
+ stable_sort(PkgList.begin(),PkgList.end(),PackageMap::SrcDBCompare());
+
+ // Generate packages
+ if (_config-FindB(APT::FTPArchive::ContentsOnly, false) == false)
+ {
+ if(DoGeneratePackagesAndSources(Setup, PkgList, SrcStats, Stats, CmdL) == false)
+ return false;
+ } else {
+ c1out Skipping Packages/Sources generation endl;
+ }
+
+ // do Contents if needed
+ if (_config-FindB(APT::FTPArchive::Contents, true) == true)
+ if (DoGenerateContents(Setup, PkgList, CmdL) == false)
+ return false;
+
struct timeval NewTime;
- gettimeofday(NewTime,0);
- double Delta = NewTime.tv_sec - StartTime.tv_sec +
+ gettimeofday(NewTime,0);
+ double Delta = NewTime.tv_sec - StartTime.tv_sec +
Bug#756261: libpam-systemd: rdepends on libpam-systemd can't run with sysvinit as libpam-systemd depend on systemd-sysv only
* Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org [2014-07-28 12:10 +0200]: Control: forcemerge 754984 -1 Am 28.07.2014 10:10, schrieb Elimar Riesebieter: Package: libpam-systemd Version: 208-6 Severity: normal Please add an alternate dependency on sysvinit-core and respective on upstart, though. That doesn't make sense at all. I suppose you meant systemd-shim. No! Either the dependency on systemd-sysv has to be removed or sysvinit-core and upstart has to be added alternatively. A dependeny on systemd-shim doesn't do nothing here. The situation at the moment is as follows: Users don't have any chance to choose an initsystem other than systemd when they want to use packages which are rdepend on libpam-systemd. And these are many many. I don't see any progress to find a fix here. On the cotrary it seems that systemd is pushed by their maintainers to get the only usable init system in DEBIAN. Anyway please check existing bug reports before filing new ones to not create unnecessary work. Anyway, please try first to understand the intention of bug reports and then post your statements Elimar -- Learned men are the cisterns of knowledge, not the fountainheads ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#756288: fluxbox: Mouse works, but cursor is hidden.
Package: fluxbox Version: 1.3.5-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, after recent upgrades, mouse is no longer shown in fluxbox. It shows up as before in lightdm, and if I log in with sessions Gnome, Gnome Classic, Openbox or LXDE. Graphics board is an intel integrated. Have tried connecting external monitor, have tried changing cursor using xsetroot. Nothing works. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages fluxbox depends on: ii libc6 2.19-7 ii libfontconfig1 2.11.0-5 ii libfreetype62.5.2-1 ii libfribidi0 0.19.6-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.9.1-1 ii libice6 2:1.0.9-1 ii libimlib2 1.4.6-2 ii libsm6 2:1.2.2-1 ii libstdc++6 4.9.1-1 ii libx11-62:1.6.2-2 ii libxext62:1.3.2-1 ii libxft2 2.3.2-1 ii libxinerama12:1.1.3-1 ii libxpm4 1:3.5.11-1 ii libxrandr2 2:1.4.2-1 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.8-1 ii menu2.1.47 Versions of packages fluxbox recommends: ii feh 2.12-1 ii xfonts-terminus 4.39-1 Versions of packages fluxbox suggests: ii fbautostart 2.718281828-1 pn fbdesk none pn fbpager none -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#756289: abcde: cddb-tool required bsd-mailx
Package: abcde Version: 2.5.4-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch cddb-tool uses the -a flag to the mail command to add a header line. GNU mailutils does not have an -a flag, and heirloom-mailx uses it to attach a file instead, hence if either of those is installed as /usr/bin/mail, then cddb-tool will not work. I have filed a bug about this upstream: https://code.google.com/p/abcde/issues/detail?id=111 For Debian, there’s a simple workaround: make abcde depend on bsd-mailx (as different packages providing “mailx” can be installed together), and change line 199 of cddb-tool to invoke “bsd-mailx” rather than “mail”. This fixes the bug (I’ve tested it!). -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers trusty-updates APT policy: (500, 'trusty-updates'), (500, 'trusty-security'), (500, 'trusty'), (90, 'utopic-updates'), (90, 'utopic-security'), (90, 'utopic') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-32-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages abcde depends on: ii cd-discid 1.4-1 ii cdparanoia3.10.2+debian-11 ii flac 1.3.0-2 ii icedax9:1.1.11-2ubuntu3 ii lame 3.99.5+repack1-3ubuntu1 ii speex 1.2~rc1.1-1ubuntu1 ii vorbis-tools 1.4.0-1ubuntu3 ii wget 1.15-1ubuntu1 Versions of packages abcde recommends: ii bsd-mailx [mailx] 8.1.2-0.20131005cvs-1 ii heirloom-mailx [mailx] 12.5-2 ii libdigest-sha-perl 5.86-1 ii libmusicbrainz-discid-perl 0.03-3 ii libwebservice-musicbrainz-perl 0.93-1 ii perl [libdigest-sha-perl] 5.18.2-2ubuntu1 ii vorbis-tools1.4.0-1ubuntu3 Versions of packages abcde suggests: ii atomicparsley0.9.2~svn110-4 pn distmp3 none ii eject2.1.5+deb1+cvs20081104-13.1 ii eyed30.6.18-1 ii id3 0.15-4 ii id3v20.1.12-2.1 ii mkcue1-4 ii mp3gain 1.5.2-r2-6 ii normalize-audio 0.7.7-12 ii vorbisgain 0.37-2 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#721103: clinfo: crashes for nvidia at built_in_kernels
tags 721103 + patch
thanks
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:18:39AM +0400, Alexander Maly wrote:
Package: clinfo
Version: 0.0.20130513-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
when nvidia opencl installed (GTX-560Ti), clinfo crashes with
uninformative E: -30
It is because nvidia opencl driver is of version 1.1 and does not
know about CL_DEVICE_BUILT_IN_KERNELS, so it returns error -30, and
method query in device.cpp throws an exception.
The result is anyway never used (nor printed), so it is possible
to remove that query at all from device::load. Though it would be much
better to make clinfo more user-friendly, that is, for unknown string
parameters to return a string like N/A or (null), and for integer
parameters to have some error values.
Or maybe query should return a status, so unknown parameters would
not be printed at all, and we won't have to use exceptions. Anyway, it
is too unusual to get no results at all because of absence of one
single element.
mesa-opencl-icd supports so far only OpenCL 1.1 and is also affected
by this bug.
amd-clinfo and clinfo from https://github.com/Oblomov/clinfo work fine.
As mentioned above removing the query CL_DEVICE_BUILT_IN_KERNELS fixed
the crash.
I've attached a patch to fix clinfo for OpenCL 1.1 drivers.
Please apply this patch.
Thanks,
Andreas.
--- a/device.cpp
+++ b/device.cpp
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@
{
query(address_bits, CL_DEVICE_ADDRESS_BITS);
query(available, CL_DEVICE_AVAILABLE);
-query(built_in_kernels, CL_DEVICE_BUILT_IN_KERNELS);
+// FIXME check for OpenCL 1.2
+// query(built_in_kernels, CL_DEVICE_BUILT_IN_KERNELS);
query(compiler_available, CL_DEVICE_COMPILER_AVAILABLE);
try
{
Bug#756288: fluxbox: Mouse works, but cursor is hidden.
Are you running gnome settings daemon? Did you disable the cursor plugin? Does it work without GNOME settings daemon? On Jul 28, 2014 9:03 AM, Morten Minde Neergaard m-deb...@8d.no wrote: Package: fluxbox Version: 1.3.5-2 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, after recent upgrades, mouse is no longer shown in fluxbox. It shows up as before in lightdm, and if I log in with sessions Gnome, Gnome Classic, Openbox or LXDE. Graphics board is an intel integrated. Have tried connecting external monitor, have tried changing cursor using xsetroot. Nothing works. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages fluxbox depends on: ii libc6 2.19-7 ii libfontconfig1 2.11.0-5 ii libfreetype62.5.2-1 ii libfribidi0 0.19.6-1 ii libgcc1 1:4.9.1-1 ii libice6 2:1.0.9-1 ii libimlib2 1.4.6-2 ii libsm6 2:1.2.2-1 ii libstdc++6 4.9.1-1 ii libx11-62:1.6.2-2 ii libxext62:1.3.2-1 ii libxft2 2.3.2-1 ii libxinerama12:1.1.3-1 ii libxpm4 1:3.5.11-1 ii libxrandr2 2:1.4.2-1 ii libxrender1 1:0.9.8-1 ii menu2.1.47 Versions of packages fluxbox recommends: ii feh 2.12-1 ii xfonts-terminus 4.39-1 Versions of packages fluxbox suggests: ii fbautostart 2.718281828-1 pn fbdesk none pn fbpager none -- no debconf information
Bug#433319: xfonts-bolkhov: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 433319 O: xfonts-bolkhov -- Cyrillic fonts for X noowner 433319 tag 433319 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting xfonts-bolkhov. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of xfonts-bolkhov back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting xfonts-bolkhov, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 433319 ITA: xfonts-bolkhov -- Cyrillic fonts for X owner 433319 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 433...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#430140: hoard: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 430140 RFP: hoard -- Fast, scalable, and efficient replacement memory allocator noowner 430140 tag 430140 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging hoard. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of hoard back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging hoard, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 430140 ITP: hoard -- Fast, scalable, and efficient replacement memory allocator owner 430140 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 430...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#756290: docker.io mention in README.Debian no longer necessary
Package: docker.io Version: 1.0.0~dfsg1-1 Severity: minor Hi. The command-line docker name clash is no longer present since bug #740863 was closed. So the following paragraph in the README.Debian is probably no longer necessary : Due to a binary name conflict, the Debian Docker binary is installed as docker.io. Please adjust your scripts and expectations accordingly. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740856#10 Hope this helps. Best regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages docker.io depends on: ii adduser 3.113+nmu3 ii init-system-helpers 1.19 ii iptables 1.4.21-2 ii libapparmor1 2.8.0-5.1+b1 ii libc62.19-7 ii libdevmapper1.02.1 2:1.02.85-2 ii libsqlite3-0 3.8.5-2 ii perl 5.18.2-7 Versions of packages docker.io recommends: ii aufs-tools 1:3.2+20130722-1.1 ii ca-certificates 20140325 ii cgroupfs-mount 1.0 ii git 1:2.0.1-1 ii xz-utils 5.1.1alpha+20120614-2 Versions of packages docker.io suggests: pn btrfs-tools none ii debootstrap 1.0.60 pn lxc none pn rinsenone -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#465331: cytoscape: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 465331 RFP: cytoscape -- scientific network analysis and noowner 465331 tag 465331 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cytoscape. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cytoscape back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging cytoscape, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 465331 ITP: cytoscape -- scientific network analysis and owner 465331 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 465...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#521391: ifrench: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 521391 O: ifrench -- The French dictionary for ispell (Hydro-Quebec version) noowner 521391 tag 521391 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting ifrench. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of ifrench back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting ifrench, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 521391 ITA: ifrench -- The French dictionary for ispell (Hydro-Quebec version) owner 521391 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 521...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#527162: gitorious: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 527162 RFP: gitorious -- Git based tool for collaborating on distributed open source projects noowner 527162 tag 527162 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gitorious. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gitorious back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging gitorious, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 527162 ITP: gitorious -- Git based tool for collaborating on distributed open source projects owner 527162 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 527...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#543169: mochiweb: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 543169 RFP: mochiweb -- Erlang library for building lightweight noowner 543169 tag 543169 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging mochiweb. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of mochiweb back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging mochiweb, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 543169 ITP: mochiweb -- Erlang library for building lightweight owner 543169 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 543...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#603293: festige: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 603293 RFP: festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst noowner 603293 tag 603293 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging festige. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of festige back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging festige, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 603293 ITP: festige -- GUI for fst and dssi-vst owner 603293 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 603...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#553996: nec2c: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 553996 O: nec2c -- translation of the NEC2 FORTRAN source code to noowner 553996 tag 553996 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting nec2c. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of nec2c back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting nec2c, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 553996 ITA: nec2c -- translation of the NEC2 FORTRAN source code to owner 553996 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 553...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#592135: color: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 592135 RFP: color -- create ANSI escape codes to color shell output noowner 592135 tag 592135 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging color. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of color back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging color, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 592135 ITP: color -- create ANSI escape codes to color shell output owner 592135 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 592...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#592494: xseticon: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 592494 RFP: xseticon -- Sets the icon of an X11 window to the specified .png image noowner 592494 tag 592494 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging xseticon. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of xseticon back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging xseticon, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 592494 ITP: xseticon -- Sets the icon of an X11 window to the specified .png image owner 592494 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 592...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#597093: diaspora: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 597093 RFP: diaspora -- Distributed and contextual social networking noowner 597093 tag 597093 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging diaspora. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of diaspora back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging diaspora, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 597093 ITP: diaspora -- Distributed and contextual social networking owner 597093 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 597...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#570439: lessfs: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 570439 RFP: lessfs -- A high performance inline data noowner 570439 tag 570439 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging lessfs. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of lessfs back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging lessfs, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 570439 ITP: lessfs -- A high performance inline data owner 570439 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 570...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#541690: fonts-indic-nonfree: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 541690 RFP: fonts-indic-nonfree -- Non free fonts for Indian languages noowner 541690 tag 541690 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging fonts-indic-nonfree. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of fonts-indic-nonfree back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging fonts-indic-nonfree, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 541690 ITP: fonts-indic-nonfree -- Non free fonts for Indian languages owner 541690 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 541...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#491008: qutim: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 491008 RFP: qutim -- instant messenger written in C++ and Qt4 noowner 491008 tag 491008 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qutim. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qutim back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging qutim, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 491008 ITP: qutim -- instant messenger written in C++ and Qt4 owner 491008 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 491...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#543296: pycdio: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 543296 RFP: pycdio -- Python interface to libcdio optical media control library noowner 543296 tag 543296 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging pycdio. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of pycdio back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging pycdio, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 543296 ITP: pycdio -- Python interface to libcdio optical media control library owner 543296 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 543...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#613210: replicatorg: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 613210 RFP: replicatorg -- Simple 3D printing program noowner 613210 tag 613210 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging replicatorg. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of replicatorg back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging replicatorg, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 613210 ITP: replicatorg -- Simple 3D printing program owner 613210 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 613...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#625615: tipp10: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 625615 RFP: tipp10 -- touch typing tutor noowner 625615 tag 625615 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging tipp10. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of tipp10 back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging tipp10, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 625615 ITP: tipp10 -- touch typing tutor owner 625615 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 625...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#624278: ruby-debug: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 624278 RFP: ruby-debug -- Faster implementation of the standard debug.rb noowner 624278 tag 624278 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ruby-debug. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ruby-debug back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging ruby-debug, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 624278 ITP: ruby-debug -- Faster implementation of the standard debug.rb owner 624278 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 624...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#628157: worklog: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 628157 O: worklog -- Keep Track of Time worked on Projects noowner 628157 tag 628157 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting worklog. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of worklog back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting worklog, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 628157 ITA: worklog -- Keep Track of Time worked on Projects owner 628157 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 628...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#608466: abcl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 608466 RFP: abcl -- A full implementation of the Common Lisp language running in JVM noowner 608466 tag 608466 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging abcl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of abcl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging abcl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 608466 ITP: abcl -- A full implementation of the Common Lisp language running in JVM owner 608466 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 608...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#628285: xul-ext-pencil: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 628285 RFP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool noowner 628285 tag 628285 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging xul-ext-pencil. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of xul-ext-pencil back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging xul-ext-pencil, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 628285 ITP: xul-ext-pencil -- GUI prototyping and diagram tool owner 628285 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 628...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#636317: libagar: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 636317 RFP: libagar -- a portable GUI toolkit noowner 636317 tag 636317 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libagar. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libagar back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libagar, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 636317 ITP: libagar -- a portable GUI toolkit owner 636317 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 636...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#639311: veracity: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 639311 RFP: veracity -- a DVCS with corporate capabilities noowner 639311 tag 639311 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging veracity. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of veracity back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging veracity, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 639311 ITP: veracity -- a DVCS with corporate capabilities owner 639311 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 639...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#651101: pymysql: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 651101 RFP: pymysql -- Pure Python DB-API Interface for MySQL noowner 651101 tag 651101 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging pymysql. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of pymysql back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging pymysql, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 651101 ITP: pymysql -- Pure Python DB-API Interface for MySQL owner 651101 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 651...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#647573: flaskext.uploads: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 647573 RFP: flaskext.uploads -- Upload handling utility for flask applications noowner 647573 tag 647573 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging flaskext.uploads. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of flaskext.uploads back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging flaskext.uploads, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 647573 ITP: flaskext.uploads -- Upload handling utility for flask applications owner 647573 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 647...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#651944: friendica: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 651944 RFP: friendica -- PHP/MySQL based decentral social network platform noowner 651944 tag 651944 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging friendica. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of friendica back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging friendica, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 651944 ITP: friendica -- PHP/MySQL based decentral social network platform owner 651944 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 651...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#657278: python-scrapelib: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 657278 RFP: python-scrapelib -- library for scraping websites noowner 657278 tag 657278 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-scrapelib. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-scrapelib back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-scrapelib, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 657278 ITP: python-scrapelib -- library for scraping websites owner 657278 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 657...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#652580: beret: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 652580 RFP: beret -- A 2d puzzle platformer game noowner 652580 tag 652580 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging beret. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of beret back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging beret, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 652580 ITP: beret -- A 2d puzzle platformer game owner 652580 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 652...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#656728: minivmac: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 656728 RFP: minivmac -- a miniature early Macintosh emulator noowner 656728 tag 656728 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging minivmac. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of minivmac back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging minivmac, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 656728 ITP: minivmac -- a miniature early Macintosh emulator owner 656728 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 656...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#645103: aspsms-t: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 645103 RFP: aspsms-t -- aspsms-t is an open source /*GPL*/ jabber2sms transport written in perl // http://github.com/micressor/aspsms-t noowner 645103 tag 645103 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging aspsms-t. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of aspsms-t back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging aspsms-t, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 645103 ITP: aspsms-t -- aspsms-t is an open source /*GPL*/ jabber2sms transport written in perl // http://github.com/micressor/aspsms-t owner 645103 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 645...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#650394: tigervnc: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 650394 RFP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC) noowner 650394 tag 650394 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging tigervnc. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of tigervnc back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging tigervnc, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 650394 ITP: tigervnc -- High-speed Virtual Network Computing (VNC) owner 650394 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 650...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#658300: libdigidoc: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 658300 RFP: libdigidoc -- C++ library for processing DDOC digital signatures (deprecated) noowner 658300 tag 658300 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libdigidoc. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libdigidoc back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libdigidoc, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 658300 ITP: libdigidoc -- C++ library for processing DDOC digital signatures (deprecated) owner 658300 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#650785: anox: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 650785 RFP: anox -- anoX permits to run an application in another X server noowner 650785 tag 650785 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging anox. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of anox back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging anox, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 650785 ITP: anox -- anoX permits to run an application in another X server owner 650785 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 650...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#643595: snes9x: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 643595 RFP: snes9x -- Cross-platform SNES emulator noowner 643595 tag 643595 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging snes9x. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of snes9x back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging snes9x, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 643595 ITP: snes9x -- Cross-platform SNES emulator owner 643595 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 643...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#647995: cellprofiler: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 647995 RFP: cellprofiler -- quantitatively measure phenotypes noowner 647995 tag 647995 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cellprofiler. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cellprofiler back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging cellprofiler, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 647995 ITP: cellprofiler -- quantitatively measure phenotypes owner 647995 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 647...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#657241: python-pyhash: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 657241 RFP: python-pyhash -- a python non-cryptographic hash library noowner 657241 tag 657241 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-pyhash. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-pyhash back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-pyhash, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 657241 ITP: python-pyhash -- a python non-cryptographic hash library owner 657241 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 657...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#658302: libdigidocpp: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 658302 RFP: libdigidocpp -- C++ library for processing BDOC digital signatures noowner 658302 tag 658302 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libdigidocpp. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libdigidocpp back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libdigidocpp, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 658302 ITP: libdigidocpp -- C++ library for processing BDOC digital signatures owner 658302 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#648668: libjreen: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 648668 RFP: libjreen -- powerful Jabber/XMPP library noowner 648668 tag 648668 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libjreen. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libjreen back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libjreen, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 648668 ITP: libjreen -- powerful Jabber/XMPP library owner 648668 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 648...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#659348: librejs: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 659348 RFP: librejs -- browser plugin to block non-free JavaScript noowner 659348 tag 659348 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging librejs. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of librejs back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging librejs, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 659348 ITP: librejs -- browser plugin to block non-free JavaScript owner 659348 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 659...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#669068: trelby: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 669068 RFP: trelby -- movie screenplay writing software noowner 669068 tag 669068 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging trelby. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of trelby back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging trelby, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 669068 ITP: trelby -- movie screenplay writing software owner 669068 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 669...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#660125: heybuddy: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 660125 RFP: heybuddy -- light identi.ca microblogging client noowner 660125 tag 660125 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging heybuddy. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of heybuddy back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging heybuddy, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 660125 ITP: heybuddy -- light identi.ca microblogging client owner 660125 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 660...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#662985: gm-assistant: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 662985 RFP: gm-assistant -- Game Master assistant for role-playing games noowner 662985 tag 662985 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gm-assistant. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gm-assistant back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging gm-assistant, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 662985 ITP: gm-assistant -- Game Master assistant for role-playing games owner 662985 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 662...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#658304: qdigidoc: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 658304 RFP: qdigidoc -- QT-based Digidoc client noowner 658304 tag 658304 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qdigidoc. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qdigidoc back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging qdigidoc, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 658304 ITP: qdigidoc -- QT-based Digidoc client owner 658304 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#668556: dparser: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 668556 RFP: dparser -- a scannerless GLR parser generator noowner 668556 tag 668556 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging dparser. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of dparser back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging dparser, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 668556 ITP: dparser -- a scannerless GLR parser generator owner 668556 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 668...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#660433: libre-jigsaw: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 660433 RFP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game noowner 660433 tag 660433 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libre-jigsaw. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libre-jigsaw back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libre-jigsaw, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 660433 ITP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game owner 660433 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 660...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#658303: qesteidutil: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 658303 RFP: qesteidutil -- Estonian ID card management utility noowner 658303 tag 658303 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qesteidutil. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qesteidutil back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging qesteidutil, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 658303 ITP: qesteidutil -- Estonian ID card management utility owner 658303 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 658...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691191: cucumber-rails: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 691191 RFP: cucumber-rails -- A gem that allow you to execute feature documentation noowner 691191 tag 691191 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging cucumber-rails. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of cucumber-rails back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging cucumber-rails, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 691191 ITP: cucumber-rails -- A gem that allow you to execute feature documentation owner 691191 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 691...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#675202: strap-base: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 675202 RFP: strap-base -- Code-base for Strap - A GUI for aligning proteins by sequence and structure noowner 675202 tag 675202 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging strap-base. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of strap-base back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging strap-base, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 675202 ITP: strap-base -- Code-base for Strap - A GUI for aligning proteins by sequence and structure owner 675202 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 675...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#691349: libopencm3: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 691349 RFP: libopencm3 -- firmware library for ARM Cortex-M3 and similar microcontrollers noowner 691349 tag 691349 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libopencm3. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libopencm3 back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libopencm3, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 691349 ITP: libopencm3 -- firmware library for ARM Cortex-M3 and similar microcontrollers owner 691349 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 691...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#679013: metaphoneptbr: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 679013 RFP: metaphoneptbr -- metaphone implementation for brazilian portuguese noowner 679013 tag 679013 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging metaphoneptbr. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of metaphoneptbr back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging metaphoneptbr, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 679013 ITP: metaphoneptbr -- metaphone implementation for brazilian portuguese owner 679013 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 679...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693774: grub-loopback-iso: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 693774 RFP: grub-loopback-iso -- Boot a compatible loopback noowner 693774 tag 693774 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging grub-loopback-iso. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of grub-loopback-iso back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging grub-loopback-iso, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 693774 ITP: grub-loopback-iso -- Boot a compatible loopback owner 693774 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 693...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#697137: whohas: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 697137 O: whohas -- query multiple distributions' package archives noowner 697137 tag 697137 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting whohas. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of whohas back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting whohas, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 697137 ITA: whohas -- query multiple distributions' package archives owner 697137 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 697...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#694134: leaflet-tilejson: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 694134 RFP: leaflet-tilejson -- leaflet-tilejson adds support for the TileJSON specification to the Leaflet map client noowner 694134 tag 694134 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging leaflet-tilejson. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of leaflet-tilejson back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging leaflet-tilejson, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 694134 ITP: leaflet-tilejson -- leaflet-tilejson adds support for the TileJSON specification to the Leaflet map client owner 694134 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 694...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#693230: multimail: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 693230 O: multimail -- Offline reader for BW, QWK,OMEN and SOUP noowner 693230 tag 693230 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting multimail. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of multimail back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting multimail, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 693230 ITA: multimail -- Offline reader for BW, QWK,OMEN and SOUP owner 693230 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 693...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698825: ad2openldap: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 698825 RFP: ad2openldap -- Replication tool to populate OpenLDAP with objects from AD noowner 698825 tag 698825 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ad2openldap. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ad2openldap back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging ad2openldap, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 698825 ITP: ad2openldap -- Replication tool to populate OpenLDAP with objects from AD owner 698825 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 698...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#696137: libtie-cache-perl: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 696137 O: libtie-cache-perl -- perl Tie::Cache - LRU Cache in Memory noowner 696137 tag 696137 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting libtie-cache-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of libtie-cache-perl back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting libtie-cache-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 696137 ITA: libtie-cache-perl -- perl Tie::Cache - LRU Cache in Memory owner 696137 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 696...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#697781: hamster-time-tracker: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 697781 RFP: hamster-time-tracker -- The linux time tracker noowner 697781 tag 697781 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging hamster-time-tracker. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of hamster-time-tracker back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging hamster-time-tracker, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 697781 ITP: hamster-time-tracker -- The linux time tracker owner 697781 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 697...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#699299: flakey: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699299 RFP: flakey -- code checker using pep8 and pyflakes noowner 699299 tag 699299 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging flakey. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of flakey back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging flakey, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699299 ITP: flakey -- code checker using pep8 and pyflakes owner 699299 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#698278: fortunes-br: changing back from ITA to O
retitle 698278 O: fortunes-br -- fortune cookies in Portuguese noowner 698278 tag 698278 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in adopting fortunes-br. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITA bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from adopting the package. This is an automatic email to change the status of fortunes-br back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), as this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months. If you are still interested in adopting fortunes-br, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 698278 ITA: fortunes-br -- fortune cookies in Portuguese owner 698278 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITA from time to time, by mailing 698...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to adopt this package, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#699113: begin: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699113 RFP: begin -- an output modifier noowner 699113 tag 699113 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging begin. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of begin back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging begin, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699113 ITP: begin -- an output modifier owner 699113 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#699175: gdb-heap: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699175 RFP: gdb-heap -- gdb extension to debug dynamic memory allocation problems noowner 699175 tag 699175 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging gdb-heap. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of gdb-heap back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging gdb-heap, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699175 ITP: gdb-heap -- gdb extension to debug dynamic memory allocation problems owner 699175 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700060: growlight: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700060 RFP: growlight -- Disk manipulation and system preparation tool noowner 700060 tag 700060 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging growlight. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of growlight back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging growlight, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700060 ITP: growlight -- Disk manipulation and system preparation tool owner 700060 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#699403: xorg-gtest: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699403 RFP: xorg-gtest -- X.Org dummy testing environment for Google Test noowner 699403 tag 699403 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging xorg-gtest. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of xorg-gtest back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging xorg-gtest, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699403 ITP: xorg-gtest -- X.Org dummy testing environment for Google Test owner 699403 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#699411: python-statsdpy: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699411 RFP: python-statsdpy -- event based statsd implementation noowner 699411 tag 699411 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-statsdpy. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-statsdpy back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-statsdpy, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699411 ITP: python-statsdpy -- event based statsd implementation owner 699411 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#699579: python-django-chimere: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699579 RFP: python-django-chimere -- collaborative and thematic maps application for Django noowner 699579 tag 699579 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-django-chimere. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-django-chimere back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-django-chimere, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699579 ITP: python-django-chimere -- collaborative and thematic maps application for Django owner 699579 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#699830: python-pygame2: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699830 RFP: python-pygame2 -- Python Multimedia Development Library noowner 699830 tag 699830 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-pygame2. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-pygame2 back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-pygame2, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699830 ITP: python-pygame2 -- Python Multimedia Development Library owner 699830 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700106: libconfig-properties-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700106 RFP: libconfig-properties-perl -- Perl implementation of the java.util.Properties API noowner 700106 tag 700106 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libconfig-properties-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libconfig-properties-perl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libconfig-properties-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700106 ITP: libconfig-properties-perl -- Perl implementation of the java.util.Properties API owner 700106 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700103: libdata-uniqid-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700103 RFP: libdata-uniqid-perl -- Perl extension for simple genrating of unique id's noowner 700103 tag 700103 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libdata-uniqid-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libdata-uniqid-perl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libdata-uniqid-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700103 ITP: libdata-uniqid-perl -- Perl extension for simple genrating of unique id's owner 700103 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#699811: seed7: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699811 RFP: seed7 -- interpreter and compiler of the Seed7 programming language noowner 699811 tag 699811 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging seed7. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of seed7 back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging seed7, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699811 ITP: seed7 -- interpreter and compiler of the Seed7 programming language owner 699811 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700390: scilab-financial: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700390 RFP: scilab-financial -- Library of financial computations functions based on Scilab noowner 700390 tag 700390 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging scilab-financial. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of scilab-financial back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging scilab-financial, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700390 ITP: scilab-financial -- Library of financial computations functions based on Scilab owner 700390 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700028: qtweetlib: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700028 RFP: qtweetlib -- qtweetlib is a QT library for talking to twitter noowner 700028 tag 700028 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qtweetlib. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qtweetlib back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging qtweetlib, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700028 ITP: qtweetlib -- qtweetlib is a QT library for talking to twitter owner 700028 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700425: qrcode: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700425 RFP: qrcode -- python module to create QR codes noowner 700425 tag 700425 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging qrcode. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of qrcode back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging qrcode, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700425 ITP: qrcode -- python module to create QR codes owner 700425 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700487: salor-hospitality: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700487 RFP: salor-hospitality -- Professional Point of Sale system for the Hospitality Industry, Restaurants and Hotels noowner 700487 tag 700487 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging salor-hospitality. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of salor-hospitality back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging salor-hospitality, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700487 ITP: salor-hospitality -- Professional Point of Sale system for the Hospitality Industry, Restaurants and Hotels owner 700487 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#699496: apr-json: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 699496 RFP: apr-json -- JSON serializer / deserializer for use with Apache Portable Runtime (APR) noowner 699496 tag 699496 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging apr-json. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of apr-json back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging apr-json, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 699496 ITP: apr-json -- JSON serializer / deserializer for use with Apache Portable Runtime (APR) owner 699496 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 699...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701126: python-shove: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 701126 RFP: python-shove -- python module for object storage to be accessed in a dictionary style noowner 701126 tag 701126 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging python-shove. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of python-shove back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging python-shove, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 701126 ITP: python-shove -- python module for object storage to be accessed in a dictionary style owner 701126 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 701...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701661: haskell-process: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 701661 RFP: haskell-process -- Process libraries in Haskell noowner 701661 tag 701661 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging haskell-process. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of haskell-process back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging haskell-process, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 701661 ITP: haskell-process -- Process libraries in Haskell owner 701661 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 701...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#700903: headoverheels: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 700903 RFP: headoverheels -- remake of the classical game from the '80s noowner 700903 tag 700903 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging headoverheels. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of headoverheels back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging headoverheels, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 700903 ITP: headoverheels -- remake of the classical game from the '80s owner 700903 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 700...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701966: pyftgl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 701966 RFP: pyftgl -- python bindings for the ftgl opengl font rendering library noowner 701966 tag 701966 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging pyftgl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of pyftgl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging pyftgl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 701966 ITP: pyftgl -- python bindings for the ftgl opengl font rendering library owner 701966 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 701...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702165: ruby-georuby: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702165 RFP: ruby-georuby -- Ruby data holder for OGC Simple Features noowner 702165 tag 702165 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ruby-georuby. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ruby-georuby back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging ruby-georuby, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702165 ITP: ruby-georuby -- Ruby data holder for OGC Simple Features owner 702165 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702162: estonianidcard: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702162 RFP: estonianidcard -- Metapackage installing all the packages for Estonian ID card support noowner 702162 tag 702162 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging estonianidcard. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of estonianidcard back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging estonianidcard, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702162 ITP: estonianidcard -- Metapackage installing all the packages for Estonian ID card support owner 702162 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701103: libanyevent-yubico-perl: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 701103 RFP: libanyevent-yubico-perl -- AnyEvent based Perl module for validating YubiKey OTPs noowner 701103 tag 701103 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging libanyevent-yubico-perl. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of libanyevent-yubico-perl back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging libanyevent-yubico-perl, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 701103 ITP: libanyevent-yubico-perl -- AnyEvent based Perl module for validating YubiKey OTPs owner 701103 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 701...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702149: vmodsynth: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702149 RFP: vmodsynth -- a modular software synthesizer noowner 702149 tag 702149 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging vmodsynth. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of vmodsynth back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging vmodsynth, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702149 ITP: vmodsynth -- a modular software synthesizer owner 702149 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702166: esteidpkcs11loader: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702166 RFP: esteidpkcs11loader -- Loads pkcs#11 module for web authentication with smart cards noowner 702166 tag 702166 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging esteidpkcs11loader. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of esteidpkcs11loader back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging esteidpkcs11loader, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702166 ITP: esteidpkcs11loader -- Loads pkcs#11 module for web authentication with smart cards owner 702166 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702028: openecard: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702028 RFP: openecard -- lightweight eID client, integrates major international standards noowner 702028 tag 702028 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging openecard. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of openecard back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging openecard, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702028 ITP: openecard -- lightweight eID client, integrates major international standards owner 702028 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702164: esteidcerts: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702164 RFP: esteidcerts -- Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates noowner 702164 tag 702164 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging esteidcerts. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of esteidcerts back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging esteidcerts, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702164 ITP: esteidcerts -- Estonian ID card root, intermediate and OCSP certificates owner 702164 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702223: hunspell-gu: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702223 RFP: hunspell-gu -- Gujarati dictionary for hunspell noowner 702223 tag 702223 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging hunspell-gu. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of hunspell-gu back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging hunspell-gu, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702223 ITP: hunspell-gu -- Gujarati dictionary for hunspell owner 702223 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702236: r-cran-quantreg: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702236 RFP: r-cran-quantreg -- Quantile Regression noowner 702236 tag 702236 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging r-cran-quantreg. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of r-cran-quantreg back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging r-cran-quantreg, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702236 ITP: r-cran-quantreg -- Quantile Regression owner 702236 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702246: ruby-escper: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702246 RFP: ruby-escper -- Collection of tools that make printing of plain text and images to one or several serial thermal ESCPOS printers easy noowner 702246 tag 702246 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ruby-escper. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ruby-escper back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging ruby-escper, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702246 ITP: ruby-escper -- Collection of tools that make printing of plain text and images to one or several serial thermal ESCPOS printers easy owner 702246 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702365: crosslibs: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702365 RFP: crosslibs -- A cross-platform library designed to simplify C++ development and provide useful utility functions noowner 702365 tag 702365 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging crosslibs. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of crosslibs back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging crosslibs, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702365 ITP: crosslibs -- A cross-platform library designed to simplify C++ development and provide useful utility functions owner 702365 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702505: ruby-activerecord-import: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702505 RFP: ruby-activerecord-import -- Extraction of the ActiveRecord::Base#import functionality from ar-extensions noowner 702505 tag 702505 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging ruby-activerecord-import. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of ruby-activerecord-import back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging ruby-activerecord-import, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702505 ITP: ruby-activerecord-import -- Extraction of the ActiveRecord::Base#import functionality from ar-extensions owner 702505 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#702351: open-numismat: changing back from ITP to RFP
retitle 702351 RFP: open-numismat -- application for coin lovers, numismatists or amateurs looking to create a numismatics collection noowner 702351 tag 702351 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging open-numismat. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open for a too long time, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from packaging the software. This is an automatic email to change the status of open-numismat back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 15 months. If you are still interested in packaging open-numismat, please send a mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org with: retitle 702351 ITP: open-numismat -- application for coin lovers, numismatists or amateurs looking to create a numismatics collection owner 702351 ! thanks It is also a good idea to document your progress on this ITP from time to time, by mailing 702...@bugs.debian.org. If you need guidance on how to package this software, please reply to this email, and/or contact the debian-ment...@lists.debian.org mailing list. Thank you for your interest in Debian, -- Lucas, for the QA team debian...@lists.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
