Bug#969260: openfjx: FTBFS (gstreamer)

2020-09-11 Thread Chris Knadle
tony mancill:
> Hi Chris!

Hello again Tony :)

> On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 05:43:17AM +, Chris Knadle wrote:
>> Chris Knadle:
>>> For what it's worth, I used a clean cowbuilder sid chroot that was fully
>>> upgraded to build openjfx 11.0.7+0-4 and the package built fine. The build 
>>> log
>>> is about 808kB -- I'll send it to the bug report if desired. Offhand I'm not
>>> sure what's going on either. It's probably wishful thinking that the 
>>> cowbuilder
>>> build log will be comparable to the buildd build logs, but I'll have a look.
>>
>> Okay, I've compared the cowbuilder logs and the buildd logs and there are a
>> number of differences, and to me it looks like buildd might be using gcc-10
>> where my cowbuilder build may not be. The buildd logs show many warning/error
>> lines of variables "first defined here" and that's indicative of a gcc-10
>> problem, along with many other errors and warnings that the cowbuilder build
>> didn't show.
>>
>> I was given some hints about this in bug #957546:
>>
>>Common build failures are new warnings resulting in build failures with
>>-Werror turned on, or new/dropped symbols in Debian symbols files.
>>For other C/C++ related build failures see the porting guide at
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html
> 
> Thank you for taking a look at this.  I suspect that you're on to
> something with gcc-10, but if that's the case, I'm worried about my
> entire build toolchain with respect to gcc-10 bugs.  Just to be sure, I
> created a fresh chroot with:
> 
>sudo sbuild-createchroot sid /path/to/chroot
> 
> And the package still builds correctly for me, and "gcc -v" in that
> chroot shows gcc 10.2:
> 
> $ schroot -c sid-amd64-sbuild -u root
> (sid-amd64-sbuild)root@lark:~# gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=gcc
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/lto-wrapper
> OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:amdgcn-amdhsa:hsa
> OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
> Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 10.2.0-6' 
> --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-10/README.Bugs 
> --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --prefix=/usr 
> --with-gcc-major-version-only --program-suffix=-10 
> --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id 
> --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix 
> --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug 
> --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new 
> --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-plugin 
> --enable-default-pie --with-system-zlib --enable-libphobos-checking=release 
> --with-target-system-zlib=auto --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-multiarch 
> --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 
> --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic 
> --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-10-OZNiN5/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-10-OZNiN5/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr,hsa
>  --without-cuda-driver --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu 
> --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
> Thread model: posix
> Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
> gcc version 10.2.0 (Debian 10.2.0-6)

I got the *exact* same output from cowbuilder when checking 'gcc -v' -- I
literally copied the above from your email, copied the output from 'gcc -v' in
my cowbuilder chroot, ran 'diff -u' on the files, and came back identical.

So ... yeah ... I also don't quite know what's going on either. I /suspect/ it's
a GCC-10 issue because of the particular warning/error messages, so it seems to
make _sense_ that it would be some GCC-10 issue, however both your and my local
build chroots should be using GCC-10 and build fine. So ... ?

> So I'm confused about what's different on the buildd system.  I will
> keep poking at it.

Something to try if you've got time:
Try doing a "colordiff -u" on the log output from your successful sbuild vs the
failed sbuild output from the buildd's; that should give a colorized output of
where there are differences in lines, and maybe there will be a hint as to
something that's different on the buildd's, like different GCC options, and also
where the build "starts to go wrong".

Maybe you've done that already, but if not that might give us some hints.
I'm building an sbuild chroot and will see if I can poke at this some also.

   -- Chris

-- 
Chris Knadle
chris.kna...@coredump.us


Bug#970006: unused-override is reported with new tag name

2020-09-11 Thread Felix Lechner
Hi Jelmer,

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 5:08 AM Jelmer Vernooij  wrote:
>
> For example, see iio-sensor-proxy. Its debian/source/lintian-overrides has:
>
> iio-sensor-proxy: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/monitor-sensor
> iio-sensor-proxy: binary-without-manpage usr/sbin/iio-sensor-proxy
> iio-sensor-proxy: systemd-service-file-missing-documentation-key 
> lib/systemd/system/iio-sensor-proxy.service

That is not quite what I am seeing. I believe these overrides are
incorrectly listed as source overrides in d/source/lintian-overrides.
[1] The tags are for installation packages, so their overrides in the
source package remain unused (one unrelated tag was removed):

% bin/lintian 
/mirror/debian/pool/main/i/iio-sensor-proxy/iio-sensor-proxy_3.0-1.dsc
I: iio-sensor-proxy source: unused-override no-manual-page
usr/bin/monitor-sensor
I: iio-sensor-proxy source: unused-override no-manual-page
usr/sbin/iio-sensor-proxy
I: iio-sensor-proxy source: unused-override
systemd-service-file-missing-documentation-key
lib/systemd/system/iio-sensor-proxy.service
P: iio-sensor-proxy source: renamed-tag binary-without-manpage =>
no-manual-page in line 2
P: iio-sensor-proxy source: renamed-tag binary-without-manpage =>
no-manual-page in line 3

As a courtesy, Lintian also reminds the user that the tag was renamed.

For the installation package, on the other hand, Lintian reports (some
unrelated tags were removed):

% bin/lintian 
/mirror/debian/pool/main/i/iio-sensor-proxy/iio-sensor-proxy_3.0-1_amd64.deb
W: iio-sensor-proxy: no-manual-page usr/bin/monitor-sensor
W: iio-sensor-proxy: no-manual-page usr/sbin/iio-sensor-proxy
I: iio-sensor-proxy:
package-supports-alternative-init-but-no-init.d-script
lib/systemd/system/iio-sensor-proxy.service
I: iio-sensor-proxy: systemd-service-file-missing-documentation-key
lib/systemd/system/iio-sensor-proxy.service
I: iio-sensor-proxy: systemd-service-file-missing-install-key
lib/systemd/system/iio-sensor-proxy.service

As far as I can tell, Lintian reports what was intended. Can you
please try moving the file in [1] to
debian/iio-sensor-proxy.lintian-overrides?

Kind regards
Felix Lechner

[1] 
https://sources.debian.org/src/iio-sensor-proxy/3.0-1/debian/source/lintian-overrides/



Bug#962573: Include SRBDS Support

2020-09-11 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi,

On 9/11/20 9:59 PM, sylvestre...@ledru.info wrote:
> Did you try to propose them upstream first?

like written in my first message, this is already upstream.

There is just no new upstream release, hence it would be nice if you
(preferably) upload a snapshot of the git head, or, cherry-pick the
mentioned commit.

If you prefer the latter, I can prepare the patches to cherry-pick if
you like me to.

Regards,
Daniel



Bug#963867: new upstream

2020-09-11 Thread Antonio Russo
Control: tag -1 patch

I've gone ahead and taken a shot at the packaging [1].  I'm running
it locally on several machines (the new FINGERPRINT option is great).

If there's any more legwork to run on this, let me know.  I'd love to
help out.

Antonio

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/debian/dma/-/merge_requests/2



Bug#970126: ITP: r-cran-argparser -- Command-Line Argument Parser

2020-09-11 Thread Steffen Moeller
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Subject: ITP: r-cran-argparser -- Command-Line Argument Parser
Package: wnpp
Owner: Steffen Moeller 
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: r-cran-argparser
  Version : 0.6
  Upstream Author : David J. H. Shih
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=argparser
* License : GPL-3+
  Programming Lang: GNU R
  Description : Command-Line Argument Parser
 Cross-platform command-line argument parser written purely in R
 with no external dependencies. It is useful with the Rscript
 front-end and facilitates turning an R script into an executable script.

Remark: This package is maintained by Debian R Packages Maintainers at
   https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-argparser



Bug#968567: linux-image-4.19.0-10-amd64: kernel failure when writing on a GFS2 partition

2020-09-11 Thread Craig, Daniel (CASS, Marsfield)
Hi Salvatore,

Thanks for chasing this up, I've just built the 4.19.144 vanilla kernel with 
the referenced commit applied and can confirm that this issue no longer occurs 
on writing to a mounted gfs2 filesystem.

Cheers,
Dan.


From: Salvatore Bonaccorso  on behalf of 
Salvatore Bonaccorso 
Sent: Friday, 11 September 2020 11:15 PM
To: Craig, Daniel (CASS, Marsfield) ; 
968...@bugs.debian.org <968...@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: Nicolas Courtel 
Subject: Re: Bug#968567: linux-image-4.19.0-10-amd64: kernel failure when 
writing on a GFS2 partition

Hi Daniel, hi Nicolas,

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:47:20AM +, Craig, Daniel (CASS, Marsfield) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can confirm the existence of this CPU soft-lock bug with gfs2.
>
> I won't worry about reproducing the kernel bug message, but I have
> done a bit of digging and if I revert the following commit, added in
> the 4.19.130 release then this fixes issue for me.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-4.19.y=c91cffd0fd010c06d67f3a9a528b858ce28c60fb
>
> Note that the problem is still present in the latest upstream
> release in the 4.19 series (4.19.144)
>
> I've reported this bug in the kernel bugzilla, referenced here:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209217

Upstream did had a look at this see (you both were CC'ed on that
thread though) the thread starting at

https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20200910194319.GA131386@eldamar.local/

and suggested that upstream commit
cbcc89b630447ec7836aa2b9242d9bb1725f5a61 is definitely needed.

Would it be possible for you to test a build with that commit added on
top? (Note the patch would need a slight refresh when applying on top
of 4.19.144 for context changes).

https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#s4.2.2
explains how to test a single patch on top of the packaging, or you
can try 4.19.144 with the cherry-picked commit.

That would be much appreciated.

Regards,
Salvatore


Bug#970123: ITP: fenicsx-performance-tests -- solvers for testing the parallel performance of DOLFIN-X

2020-09-11 Thread Drew Parsons
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons 
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-scie...@lists.debian.org, 
lu...@debian.org

* Package name: fenicsx-performance-tests
  Version : git20200719.42769f8
  Upstream Author : Chris N. Richardson 
* URL : https://github.com/FEniCS/performance-test
* License : MIT
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : solvers for testing the parallel performance of DOLFIN-X

This package contains solvers for testing the parallel performance of
DOLFIN-X and the underlying linear solvers. It tests elliptic equations
- Poisson equation and elasticity - in three dimensions.

DOLFINX-X is the next-generation solver for the FEniCS project.

The intention of this package is help demonstrate and monitor the HPC
performance of Debian's FEniCS/DOLFIN-X packages. HPC compute time has
been graciously offered for HPC package testing by France's Grid5000
consortium, grid5000.fr.

To be maintained alongside fenics/dolfinx under the 
Debian Science Team. 



Bug#960132: mdadm: mdcheck_start.service trying to start unexisting file

2020-09-11 Thread Richard Laager
On Sun, 10 May 2020 02:16:57 +0700 Павел Мотырев 
wrote:
> There is a patch in attachment, that adds missed scripts into the
> package during build process.

syslog-events is already installed by a dh_installexamples call.

Also, I'm not sure why this would need to install the mdcheck script
into the udeb.

So I end up with this (sorry for my mail client line wrapping the
context lines):

diff -Nru mdadm-4.1/debian/rules mdadm-4.1/debian/rules
--- mdadm-4.1/debian/rules  2019-03-11 22:58:03.0 -0500
+++ mdadm-4.1/debian/rules  2020-09-11 17:08:40.0 -0500
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@

install -Dm0755 debian/mkconf $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/mdadm/mkconf
install -Dm0755 debian/checkarray $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/mdadm/checkarray
+   install -Dm0755 misc/mdcheck $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/mdadm/mdcheck
install -Dm0755 debian/bugscript $(DESTDIR)/usr/share/bug/mdadm/script
install -Dm0755 udeb/mdadm $(DESTDIR_UDEB)/sbin/mdadm
install -Dm0755 udeb/mdmon $(DESTDIR_UDEB)/sbin/mdmon


-- 
Richard



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#946979: lists.debian.org: Have a mailing list archive for the JavaScript team.

2020-09-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Alexander,

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 1:26 AM Alexander Wirt  wrote:
> Please follow the instructions in 
> https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/HOWTO_start_list
> and provide me with the needed information (Name, Rationale,
> Descriptions and so on).

If I'm understanding the guide correctly, from the "Moving existing
mailing lists to lists.debian.org" section, I feel that I don't really
need a name, rationale, and so on, right?
Because we want to move away from the existing alioth-lists.d.net
service to lists.d.o.

The JavaScript team's current list is
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-javascript-devel/ and
we'd appreciate having lists.debian.org/debian-js instead.
And it'd be great to have the existing archive to be imported as well!

Please let me know if I'm not correctly parsing the mentioned guide.


- u



Bug#970122: lexgrog: NAME section: does not recognize the \[...] form for a "dash"

2020-09-11 Thread Bjarni Ingi Gislason
Package: man-db
Version: 2.9.3-2
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

   * What led up to the situation?

Searching the database with "man -k web"

   * What was the outcome of this action?

...
cweb (1) - (unknown subject)
...

##

  An example is in the manual "cweb.1" in the "texlive-binaries" Debian
package.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.7.17-1 (SMP w/2 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=is_IS.iso88591, LC_CTYPE=is_IS.iso88591 (charmap=ISO-8859-1), 
LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

Versions of packages man-db depends on:
ii  bsdextrautils  2.36-3
ii  bsdmainutils   12.1.7
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.74
ii  dpkg   1.20.5
ii  groff-base 1.22.4-5
ii  libc6  2.31-3
ii  libgdbm6   1.18.1-5.1
ii  libpipeline1   1.5.3-1
ii  libseccomp22.4.3-1+b1
ii  zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2

man-db recommends no packages.

Versions of packages man-db suggests:
pn  apparmor   
ii  elinks [www-browser]   0.13.2-1
ii  firefox-esr [www-browser]  78.2.0esr-1
ii  groff  1.22.4-5
ii  less   551-2
ii  lynx [www-browser] 2.9.0dev.5-1
ii  w3m [www-browser]  0.5.3-38+b1

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/manpath.config changed [not included]

-- debconf information excluded

-- 
Bjarni I. Gislason



Bug#970113: Network scanning fails without proper permissions

2020-09-11 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Dear Maintainer,
the issue reported in #950646 might be a similar or the same.

Kind regards,
Bernhard



Bug#921707: glowing bear blocked by libjs-pako

2020-09-11 Thread Louis-Philippe Véronneau
block 921707 by 877730
thanks

Gave this another go today and to replace the 3rdparty bundled
zlib.js/inflate.js file with pako from Debian, I need libjs-pako (#877730).

I thought about bundling inflate.min.js as-is, but I haven't been able
to reproduce it from the non-minimised source. It seems the tooling
upstream zlib.js uses to minimize the file has changed since the file
was bundled (ant -> grunt).

-- 
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#969663: Upstream version 4.5.0

2020-09-11 Thread Bastian Germann
Importing the new upstream version 4.5.0 will need the enclosed changes.
Upstream commit dfee8d03468f25667a95902008933e3c4080d38d introduced an
ABI change that might have to be dealt with: Unifying
wolfSSL_sk_SSL_CIPHER_dup and wolfSSL_sk_X509_dup to wolfSSL_sk_dup.
From: Bastian Germann 
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:32:31 +0200
Subject: Disable upstream patches
---
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1,8 +1,4 @@
 utf8.patch
-rename-hash-type.patch
-rename-validate-date-function.patch
-b07dfa425dc9416c4188830e79fd26.patch
-c8b87eab5f2fe2ae2c3527bbfb33db6ed8b55999.patch
 reproducible-build.patch
 improve-clean-target.patch
 dfsg.patch
From: Bastian Germann 
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 22:17:59 +0200
Subject: Keep the same tls/ssl versions
---
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
 override_dh_auto_configure:
 	dh_auto_configure -- \
 		--enable-distro \
-		--enable-tls13 \
+		--enable-sslv3 \
+		--enable-tlsv10 \
 		--disable-examples \
 		--disable-silent-rules
 


Bug#970120: Updating the genshi Uploaders list

2020-09-11 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Source: genshi
Version: 0.7.1-5 0.7.3-2
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint

Barry Warsaw  has retired, so can't work on
the genshi package anymore.

We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close
that part of the file.

(If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please
step in as a new maintainer.)

Thanks.

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970119: Updating the flufl.testing Uploaders list

2020-09-11 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Source: flufl.testing
Version: 0.7-1 0.7-2
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint

Barry Warsaw  has retired, so can't work on
the flufl.testing package anymore.

We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close
that part of the file.

(If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please
step in as a new maintainer.)

Thanks.

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970116: Updating the enum34 Uploaders list

2020-09-11 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Source: enum34
Version: 1.1.6-2 1.1.6-4
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint

Barry Warsaw  has retired, so can't work on
the enum34 package anymore.

We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close
that part of the file.

(If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please
step in as a new maintainer.)

Thanks.

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970118: Updating the flufl.password Uploaders list

2020-09-11 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Source: flufl.password
Version: 1.3-2 1.3-3
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint

Barry Warsaw  has retired, so can't work on
the flufl.password package anymore.

We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close
that part of the file.

(If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please
step in as a new maintainer.)

Thanks.

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970121: Updating the gtimelog Uploaders list

2020-09-11 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Source: gtimelog
Version: 0.11.2-1
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint

Barry Warsaw  has retired, so can't work on
the gtimelog package anymore.

We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close
that part of the file.

(If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please
step in as a new maintainer.)

Thanks.

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970115: Updating the dirtbike Uploaders list

2020-09-11 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Source: dirtbike
Version: 0.3-2.1 0.3-7
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint

Barry Warsaw  has retired, so can't work on
the dirtbike package anymore.

We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close
that part of the file.

(If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please
step in as a new maintainer.)

Thanks.

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970117: Updating the flufl.enum Uploaders list

2020-09-11 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Source: flufl.enum
Version: 4.1.1-1 4.1.1-3
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint

Barry Warsaw  has retired, so can't work on
the flufl.enum package anymore.

We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close
that part of the file.

(If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please
step in as a new maintainer.)

Thanks.

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970114: Updating the cov-core Uploaders list

2020-09-11 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Source: cov-core
Version: 1.15.0-2 1.15.0-3
Severity: minor
User: m...@qa.debian.org
Usertags: mia-teammaint

Barry Warsaw  has retired, so can't work on
the cov-core package anymore.

We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you
to remove them from the Uploaders list of the package so we can close
that part of the file.

(If the person is listed as Maintainer, what we are asking is to please
step in as a new maintainer.)

Thanks.

-- 
Pierre-Elliott Bécue
GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970113: Network scanning fails without proper permissions

2020-09-11 Thread James Klaas
Package: sane-backends
Version: 1.0.27-3.2

Since the upgrade to Buster, I've been unable to use the network
scanning function of SANE.

I can see the scanner fine on the host with the scanner attached:

user@scanhost: scanimage -L
device `avision:libusb:001:014' is a Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 8200
flatbed scanner

However, there is no "net" connection. "scanimage -L" from a remote
host with "/etc/sane.d/net.conf" set to point to the scanner host also
shows no scanner available.

If I create "/etc/udev/rules.d/60-scanner.rules" with:

SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="03f0", ATTR{idProduct}=="0b01",
OWNER="saned", GROUP="saned", MODE="0666"

and restart udev (service udev restart), then unplug and replug the
scanner in, I can now see the scanner over the network:

user@scanhost: scanimage -L
device `avision:libusb:001:014' is a Hewlett-Packard ScanJet 8200
flatbed scanner
device `net:192.168.74.12:avision:libusb:001:014' is a Hewlett-Packard
ScanJet 8200 flatbed scanner
device `net:localhost:avision:libusb:001:014' is a Hewlett-Packard
ScanJet 8200 flatbed scanner
device `net:127.0.0.1:avision:libusb:001:014' is a Hewlett-Packard
ScanJet 8200 flatbed scanner

and

user@remotehost: scanimage -L
device `net:192.168.74.12:avision:libusb:001:014' is a Hewlett-Packard
ScanJet 8200 flatbed scanner

James



Bug#962573: Include SRBDS Support

2020-09-11 Thread sylvestredeb

Hello,

On 2020-09-11 20:48, Daniel Baumann wrote:

Hi,

thank you again for maintaining spectre-meltdown-checker in debian.

I'm aware that there's no new upstream release since quite a while, yet
it would be very handy to have the above mentioned commits merged in 
the

debian package.

Would you accept patches for it?


Did you try to propose them upstream first?

Thanks
Sylvestre



Bug#936208: bist: diff for NMU version 0.5.2-1.2

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Attached the patch for my NMU.

Cheers,
Moritz

diff -Nru bist-0.5.2/debian/changelog bist-0.5.2/debian/changelog
--- bist-0.5.2/debian/changelog	2016-01-26 12:47:31.0 +0100
+++ bist-0.5.2/debian/changelog	2020-09-11 20:36:59.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+bist (0.5.2-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Drop unused python build dep (Closes: #936208)
+
+ -- Moritz Muehlenhoff   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:36:59 +0200
+
 bist (0.5.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru bist-0.5.2/debian/control bist-0.5.2/debian/control
--- bist-0.5.2/debian/control	2016-01-26 12:47:18.0 +0100
+++ bist-0.5.2/debian/control	2020-09-11 20:36:39.0 +0200
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
  , pkg-config
  , libcairo2-dev
  , libpango1.0-dev
- , python
  , libncurses5-dev
  , libplot-dev
  , libexpat1-dev


Bug#937288: piggyphoto: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 09:51:24PM +0200, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> Agreed. It was packaged as a reverse dependency for other software,
> but other problems eventually prevented the packaging of that.

Ack, I've just filed an RM bug.

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#970112: RM: piggyphoto -- RoQA; Depends on Python 2, dead upstream, no reverse deps

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Please remove piggyphoto. It depends on Python 2, is dead upstream and there are
no reverse deps. Acked by the maintainer in #937288.

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#957156: Fix for compilation error under gcc 10

2020-09-11 Thread Stéphane Lesimple

Hello,

I'm not the original author but the maintainer of the unofficial 
https://github.com/speed47/dvdisaster version. I happen to already have 
fixed this compilation issue. The patch is trivial and attached to this 
message.


Best Regards,

Stéphane.
diff --git a/dvdisaster.c b/dvdisaster.c
index 6840fd5..da616b9 100644
--- a/dvdisaster.c
+++ b/dvdisaster.c
@@ -22,6 +22,11 @@
 
 #include "dvdisaster.h"
 
+struct _RawBuffer *rawbuffer_forward;
+struct _DefectiveSectorHeader *dsh_forward;
+struct _DeviceHandle *dh_forward;
+struct _Image *dh_image;
+
 /*
  * The all-famous main() loop 
  */
diff --git a/dvdisaster.h b/dvdisaster.h
index f536040..e729e96 100644
--- a/dvdisaster.h
+++ b/dvdisaster.h
@@ -438,10 +438,10 @@ typedef struct _CrcBlock
  *** forward declarations
  ***/
 
-struct _RawBuffer *rawbuffer_forward;
-struct _DefectiveSectorHeader *dsh_forward;
-struct _DeviceHandle *dh_forward;
-struct _Image *dh_image;
+extern struct _RawBuffer *rawbuffer_forward;
+extern struct _DefectiveSectorHeader *dsh_forward;
+extern struct _DeviceHandle *dh_forward;
+extern struct _Image *dh_image;
 
 /***
  *** bitmap.c


Bug#937288: piggyphoto: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-11 Thread Aigars Mahinovs
Agreed. It was packaged as a reverse dependency for other software,
but other problems eventually prevented the packaging of that.

On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 21:42, Moritz Mühlenhoff  wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:30:59AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: src:piggyphoto
> > Version: 0.1dev-git20141014
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: sid bullseye
> > User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> > Usertags: py2removal
> >
> > Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> > Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html
>
> Aigars,
> piggyphoto is dead upstream, the last commit is from a decade ago
> and there are no reverse deps, let's remove it from the archive?
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz



-- 
Best regards,
Aigars Mahinovsmailto:aigar...@debian.org
  #--#
 | .''`.Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org)|
 | : :' :   Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv) |
 | `. `'Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting   |
 |   `- (http://www.aiteki.com) |
 #--#



Bug#970110: RM: python-versuchung -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, unused, no rev deps

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Please remove python-versuchung. It's unmaintained (last upload in 2014, no 
followup
to Py2 RC bugs in a year) and there are no reverse deps.

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#970111: enigmail: Upgrade to migration version 2.2.x for Thunderbird 78

2020-09-11 Thread Gregor Riepl
Package: enigmail
Version: 2:2.1.6+ds1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
X-Debbugs-Cc: onit...@gmail.com

Dear Maintainer,

Please consider uploading the latest 2.2 version of Enigmail to support the
ongoing Thunderbird upgrade to version 78.

This version includes a migration wizard for existing Enigmail configurations,
which will become obsolete due to the integration of PGP support in
Thunderbird. Since the Thunderbird 78 package in Debian contains a Breaks: on
Enigmail << 2.2, it will cause Enigmail to be removed when upgrading
Thunderbird. This will lead to users missing out on the conversion wizard.

d/watch refers to the project homepage and not the Gitlab page, so it currently
doesn't detect these new versions. The code for Enigmail 2.2 can be found here:
https://gitlab.com/enigmail/enigmail/-/tags

It's possible that Enigmail 2.2 no longer contains functionality for
Thunderbird << 78, so careful testing of the package is needed. Thunderbird 78
is currently only available in experimental, so an upload to experimental first
would be a good idea.

Thank you.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 
'testing-debug'), (300, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.7.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_USER
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages enigmail depends on:
ii  gnupg2.2.20-1
ii  gpg-agent [gnupg-agent]  2.2.20-1
ii  thunderbird  1:68.12.0-1

Versions of packages enigmail recommends:
ii  pinentry-qt [pinentry-x11]  1.1.0-4

enigmail suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Bug#970109: rust-derive-builder has unsatisfiable dependency on non-existent rust-compiletest-rs

2020-09-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Package: librust-derive-builder+compiletest-rs-dev
Version: 0.9.0-2
Severity: grave
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu groovy

The librust-derive-builder+compiletest-rs-dev package is uninstallable
because it depends on librust-compiletest-rs-0.3+default-dev, which does not
exist anywhere in Debian, including in the NEW queue.

We should not have uninstallable packages in the archive.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#937288: piggyphoto: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:30:59AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:piggyphoto
> Version: 0.1dev-git20141014
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: py2removal
> 
> Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html

Aigars,
piggyphoto is dead upstream, the last commit is from a decade ago
and there are no reverse deps, let's remove it from the archive?

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#970096: buster-pu: package libdbi-perl/1.642-1+deb10u1

2020-09-11 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Xavier,

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 06:02:00PM +0200, Xavier Guimard wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org
> 
> [ Reason ]
> libdbi-perl is vulnerable to (low) security bug (CVE-2020-14392)
> 
> [ Impact ]
> libdbi-perl may crash if an attacker can give a malformed login
> 
> [ Tests ]
> No new test, current passed
> 
> [ Risks ]
> This patch is very simple
> 
> [ Checklist ]
>   [X] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
>   [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
>   [X] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
>   [X] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable
> 
> [ Changes ]
> Returned values are more tested

> diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> index d2e35cc..d0ad39a 100644
> --- a/debian/changelog
> +++ b/debian/changelog
> @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> +libdbi-perl (1.642-1+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * Fix memory corruption in XS functions when Perl stack is reallocated
> +(Closes: CVE-2020-14392)

Note that there is as well CVE-2020-14393, could you add the fix for
this one as well?

Regards,
Salvatore



Bug#968707: thunderbird: Please allow Enigmail 2.2.x with Thunderbird 78

2020-09-11 Thread Gregor Riepl
> any idea when Enigmail 2.2.x will finds it's way into unstable? Ubuntu 
> already is using this version in Groovy Gorilla.

Note that the 2.2 addon is not mentioned anywhere on the Enigmail
homepage and the Debian watch doesn't detect it either, because it
points to the homepage and not the project's Gitlab page.

You can find it on https://gitlab.com/enigmail/enigmail/-/tags though.



Bug#970108: RM: mandrill -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy, no rdeps, unused

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Please remove mandrill. It's RC-buggy, the last upload was in 2016, there are
no reverse deps and popcon is practically non-existent.

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#969609: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#969609: rust-zstd: unbuildable, uninstallable, depends on non-existent rust-zstd-safe

2020-09-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Ximin,

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:23:49PM +0100, Ximin Luo wrote:
> You keep filing these same bugs.  I have told you this many times before
> already: this is just how rust packaging works, Britney's migration policy
> already prevents these packages from reaching Debian Testing, so there is
> no problem, no users are affected.

> You filing these bug reports accomplishes nothing, except delay & annoy
> other Rust packagers who forget to close these pointless bugs, thereby
> unnecessarily blocking any fixed packages from actually reaching Debian
> Testing.  Oftentimes the fix is also not to update the package itself, but
> to upload another package.  Due to the idiosyncracies of the BTS, not
> everyone knows how to close these bugs correctly (notfound -1 $version)
> and it will result in further delays.

> Please stop filing these bug reports, they only create extra unnecessary
> work for other people, and make Debian worse for users, by slowing down
> the stream of fixes.  Britney already prevents Testing migration.

It is not credible to me that this is "just how rust packaging works".  The
bugs I am filing are against packages that have been uninstallable in
unstable for more than 4 months.  The missing dependencies are not in the
NEW queue, and there are no ITP bugs filed for them.  There is no reason to
believe, without filing these bugs, that anyone on the rust packaging team
is doing anything about these missing dependencies.

And filing bug reports in the Debian BTS is the standard way in Debian to
document bugs in packages.

And it is unacceptable that Debian maintainers don't know how to operate the
Debian BTS.

So no, I will not stop filing bugs against RC-buggy packages that the Rust
maintainers are clearly not taking care of.  If you don't want bug reports,
you have the option to stop uploading packages that are RC buggy from the
moment they're accepted into the archive.

> Steve Langasek:
> > Source: rust-zstd
> > Version: 0.5.1-1
> > Severity: grave
> > 
> > The rust-zstd package has both a dependency and a build-dependency on
> > librust-zstd-safe-2.0.3+experimental-dev, which does not exist anywhere in
> > Debian.  Presumably it would be built by a rust-zstd-safe package, but no
> > such package exists, including in the Debian NEW queue.
> > 
> > The binaries of rust-zstd that are in Debian were clearly not built on the
> > autobuilders, and all other architectures besides amd64 are unable to build
> > this package.
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > Pkg-rust-maintainers mailing list
> > pkg-rust-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
> > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-rust-maintainers
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35
> GPG: rsa4096/1318EFAC5FBBDBCE
> https://github.com/infinity0/pubkeys.git

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970107: RM: servefile -- RoQA; unmaintained, RC-buggy

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal

Please remove servefile. It's RC-buggy (Py2), hasn't seen an upload
since 2015 and no followup to any of the open bugs.

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#970106: lintian-info.1.gz is a dangling symlink

2020-09-11 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Package: lintian
Version: 2.94.0
Severity: normal

Hello,

$ man lintian-info
man: warning: /usr/share/man/man1/lintian-info.1.gz is a dangling symlink
No manual entry for lintian-info
See 'man 7 undocumented' for help when manual pages are not available.

I see this is already fixed in git[1], so just report this bug for
others who hit this problem to locate it quicker.

Best regards
Uwe

[1] 
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/0cb2170036d65a28afd669ea894b319709a12e6f

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (800, 'stable-updates'), (800, 'stable'), (700, 'testing'), (600, 
'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 
'stable-debug'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable'), (499, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-10-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils2.35-2
ii  bzip2   1.0.6-9.2~deb10u1
ii  diffstat1.62-1
ii  dpkg1.19.7
ii  dpkg-dev1.19.7
ii  file1:5.35-4+deb10u1
ii  gettext 0.19.8.1-10
ii  gpg 2.2.20-1
ii  intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.5
ii  libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.36+b3
ii  libarchive-zip-perl 1.64-1
ii  libcapture-tiny-perl0.48-1
ii  libclass-xsaccessor-perl1.19-3+b5
ii  libclone-perl   0.45-1
ii  libconfig-tiny-perl 2.23-1
ii  libcpanel-json-xs-perl  4.19-1
ii  libdata-dpath-perl  0.58-1
ii  libdata-validate-domain-perl0.10-1
ii  libdevel-size-perl  0.83-1+b1
ii  libdpkg-perl1.19.7
ii  libemail-address-xs-perl1.04-1+b2
ii  libfile-basedir-perl0.08-1
ii  libfile-find-rule-perl  0.34-1
ii  libfont-ttf-perl1.06-1
ii  libhtml-html5-entities-perl 0.004-1
ii  libipc-run3-perl0.048-2
ii  libjson-maybexs-perl1.004000-1
ii  liblist-compare-perl0.53-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl  0.416-1+b5
ii  liblist-utilsby-perl0.11-1
ii  libmoo-perl 2.003004-2
ii  libmoox-aliases-perl0.001006-1
ii  libnamespace-clean-perl 0.27-1
ii  libpath-tiny-perl   0.108-1
ii  libperlio-gzip-perl 0.19-1+b6
ii  libproc-processtable-perl   0.59-2
ii  libsereal-decoder-perl  4.017+ds-1
ii  libsereal-encoder-perl  4.017+ds-1
ii  libtext-glob-perl   0.10-1
ii  libtext-levenshteinxs-perl  0.03-4+b7
ii  libtext-markdown-discount-perl  0.12-1
ii  libtext-xslate-perl 3.5.8-1
ii  libtime-duration-perl   1.21-1
ii  libtime-moment-perl 0.44-1+b2
ii  libtimedate-perl2.3300-1
ii  libtry-tiny-perl0.30-1
ii  libtype-tiny-perl   1.004004-1
ii  libunicode-utf8-perl0.62-1+b1
ii  liburi-perl 1.76-2
ii  libxml-libxml-perl  2.0134+dfsg-2
ii  libyaml-libyaml-perl0.82+repack-1
ii  lzip1.21-8
ii  lzop1.03-4+b1
ii  man-db  2.8.5-2
ii  patchutils  0.3.4-2
ii  perl [libdigest-sha-perl]   5.30.3-4
ii  t1utils 1.41-3
ii  unzip   6.0-23+deb10u1
ii  xz-utils5.2.4-1

lintian recommends no packages.

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii  binutils-multiarch 2.35-2
ii  libtext-template-perl  1.55-1

-- no debconf information



Bug#937102: mysql-workbench: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:11:46PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Tuesday, 1 September 2020 4:57:56 AM AEST Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > There's radio silence on https://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=98839,
> 
> They are not very transparent and their public bug tracker is somewhat 
> redundant, I think... They are also slow to make transitional changes...
> 
> 
> > let's remove?
> 
> I'd like to keep it for as long as possible please, unless you insist.
> 
> MySQL-Workbench will be very difficult to re-introduce due to slow ftp-
> masters processing time for a package with that size and complexity.
> It was very difficult to introduce for a first time as it required a
> long and tedious review. 
> I'm not looking forward to go through the process again...

Fair enough, let's give upstream some more time, then.

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#964399: Should ganglia be removed?

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 01:31:08PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Hi Marcos,
> 
> I overlooked this in my inbox..
> 
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 11:15:58PM +0200, Marcos Fouces wrote:
> > Hello Moritz
> > 
> > I did some work time ago on ganglia [1] but i never get this work
> > published due to unactive/unresponsive uploaders.
> > 
> > I also done some work on ganglia-web and ganglia-linux-modules packages
> > (also unpublished).
> > 
> > I believe that it is still a good piece of software that deserve its
> > place on Debian so i would like to step up as uploader (co-uploaders
> > welcome!) if needed.
> > 
> > I also would like to maintain it under pkg-security team umbrella.
> > 
> > Please, let me know your thoughs.
> 
> Do you have a plan how to deal with the plugins in Python 2? Will
> you port them yourself or rather drop them?
> 
> Packaging it under the pkg-security umbrella feels a little off/odd,
> but if you think Ganglia is still useful in 2020 and want to adopt
> it and fix the bugs, sure please go ahead :-)

Are you still interested in adopting ganglia? Otherwise I'll file an
RM bug soon.
 
Cheers,
 Moritz
 



Bug#970105: lintian-info -t stopped working

2020-09-11 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Package: lintian
Version: 2.93.0
Severity: normal

Hello,

I just updated to lintian 2.93.0 (from 2.82.0) and found that
lintian-info isn't working any more as before:

$ lintian-info -t systemd-service-file-missing-install-key
Unknown option: t
error parsing options

The changelog for 2.92.0 has:

* Split bin/lintian-info into separate annotate-lintian-hints and 
explain-lintian-tags.

Obviously this was an API-changer. :-\

Maybe lintian-info can be made a wrapper around the two new commands
with a compatible API or if this isn't considered sensible it can better
be removed.

Best regards
Uwe

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.5
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (800, 'stable-updates'), (800, 'stable'), (700, 'testing'), (600, 
'unstable'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 
'stable-debug'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable'), (499, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-10-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages lintian depends on:
ii  binutils2.35-2
ii  bzip2   1.0.6-9.2~deb10u1
ii  diffstat1.62-1
ii  dpkg1.19.7
ii  dpkg-dev1.19.7
ii  file1:5.35-4+deb10u1
ii  gettext 0.19.8.1-10
ii  gpg 2.2.20-1
ii  intltool-debian 0.35.0+20060710.5
ii  libapt-pkg-perl 0.1.36+b3
ii  libarchive-zip-perl 1.64-1
ii  libcapture-tiny-perl0.48-1
ii  libclass-xsaccessor-perl1.19-3+b5
ii  libclone-perl   0.45-1
ii  libconfig-tiny-perl 2.23-1
ii  libcpanel-json-xs-perl  4.19-1
ii  libdata-dpath-perl  0.58-1
ii  libdata-validate-domain-perl0.10-1
ii  libdevel-size-perl  0.83-1+b1
ii  libdpkg-perl1.19.7
ii  libemail-address-xs-perl1.04-1+b2
ii  libfile-basedir-perl0.08-1
ii  libfile-find-rule-perl  0.34-1
ii  libfont-ttf-perl1.06-1
ii  libhtml-html5-entities-perl 0.004-1
ii  libipc-run3-perl0.048-2
ii  libjson-maybexs-perl1.004000-1
ii  liblist-compare-perl0.53-1
ii  liblist-moreutils-perl  0.416-1+b5
ii  liblist-utilsby-perl0.11-1
ii  libmoo-perl 2.003004-2
ii  libmoox-aliases-perl0.001006-1
ii  libnamespace-clean-perl 0.27-1
ii  libpath-tiny-perl   0.108-1
ii  libperlio-gzip-perl 0.19-1+b6
ii  libproc-processtable-perl   0.59-2
ii  libsereal-decoder-perl  4.017+ds-1
ii  libsereal-encoder-perl  4.017+ds-1
ii  libtext-glob-perl   0.10-1
ii  libtext-levenshteinxs-perl  0.03-4+b7
ii  libtext-markdown-discount-perl  0.12-1
ii  libtext-xslate-perl 3.5.8-1
ii  libtime-duration-perl   1.21-1
ii  libtime-moment-perl 0.44-1+b2
ii  libtimedate-perl2.3300-1
ii  libtry-tiny-perl0.30-1
ii  libtype-tiny-perl   1.004004-1
ii  libunicode-utf8-perl0.62-1+b1
ii  liburi-perl 1.76-2
ii  libxml-libxml-perl  2.0134+dfsg-2
ii  libyaml-libyaml-perl0.82+repack-1
ii  lzip1.21-8
ii  lzop1.03-4+b1
ii  man-db  2.8.5-2
ii  patchutils  0.3.4-2
ii  perl [libdigest-sha-perl]   5.30.3-4
ii  t1utils 1.41-3
ii  unzip   6.0-23+deb10u1
ii  xz-utils5.2.4-1

lintian recommends no packages.

Versions of packages lintian suggests:
ii  binutils-multiarch 2.35-2
ii  libtext-template-perl  1.55-1

-- no debconf information



Bug#937269: peframe: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 03:57:53PM +0100, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> Just an update: Python 3 compatibility is indeed introduced in the latest 
> upstream version, however, that version also adds some new dependencies that 
> would need to be packaged and pass NEW. For example, python-virustotal-api, 
> which has been in NEW for quite some time. I have also looked at adding 
> python-oletools, but that will also need new dependencies of its own.
> I’ll try work on this eventually, unless someone else is interested and has 
> some spare time.

Are you still actively working on this one or should we rather remove peframe 
for now?

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#970104: rust-gstreamer has unsatisfiable dependency on non-existent rust-futures-core-preview

2020-09-11 Thread Steve Langasek
Source: rust-gstreamer
Version: 0.14.5-2
Severity: grave
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu groovy

The librust-gstreamer+futures-dev package is uninstallable because it
depends on librust-futures-core-preview-0.3+default-dev, which does not
exist anywhere in Debian, including in the NEW queue.

We should not have uninstallable packages in the archive.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970103: xe FTCBFS: does not pass cross tools to make

2020-09-11 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: xe
Version: 0.11-4
Tags: patch
User: debian-cr...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs

xe fails to cross build from source, because it does not pass cross
tools to make. The easiest way of doing so - using dh_auto_build - makes
xe cross buildable. Please consider applying the attached patch.

Helmut
diff --minimal -Nru xe-0.11/debian/changelog xe-0.11/debian/changelog
--- xe-0.11/debian/changelog2020-02-15 20:40:02.0 +0100
+++ xe-0.11/debian/changelog2020-09-11 20:59:00.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+xe (0.11-4.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix FTCBFS: Let dh_auto_build pass cross tools to make. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:59:00 +0200
+
 xe (0.11-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Update authorship information
diff --minimal -Nru xe-0.11/debian/rules xe-0.11/debian/rules
--- xe-0.11/debian/rules2020-02-15 20:40:02.0 +0100
+++ xe-0.11/debian/rules2020-09-11 20:58:56.0 +0200
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
dh $@
 
 override_dh_auto_build:
-   $(MAKE) $(shell dpkg-buildflags --export=configure)
+   dh_auto_build -- $(shell dpkg-buildflags --export=configure)
 
 override_dh_auto_install:
dh_auto_install -- PREFIX=/usr


Bug#937187: olefile: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 07:29:10AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:olefile
> Version: 0.46-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid bullseye
> User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: py2removal
> 
> Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
> Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html
> 
> Your package either build-depends, depends on Python2, or uses Python2
> in the autopkg tests.  Please stop using Python2, and fix this issue
> by one of the following actions.

Matthias,
can you please drop the Py2 package at this point? The only reverse
dep is python-pil with never entered testing intentionally anyway.

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#937184: offlineimap: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 06:24:44PM +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> 
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 01:21PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > Nine months later there's no progress, let's remove?
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Raising the severity to serious to remove from testing, and then I will
> request for removal.

offlineimap has been dropped from testing since ~ three weeks, let's
proceed with removal from unstable, then?

Cheers,
Moritz



Bug#962573: Include SRBDS Support

2020-09-11 Thread Daniel Baumann
Hi,

thank you again for maintaining spectre-meltdown-checker in debian.

I'm aware that there's no new upstream release since quite a while, yet
it would be very handy to have the above mentioned commits merged in the
debian package.

Would you accept patches for it?

Regards,
Daniel



Bug#970102: src:barman: fails to migrate to testing for too long: maintainer built arch:all binaries

2020-09-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: barman
Version: 2.10-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.11-1
Tags: sid bullseye pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync

Dear maintainer(s),

As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as
having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:barman in its
current version in unstable has been trying to migrate for 60 days [2].
Hence, I am filing this bug.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult.
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or
its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that
hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if
that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bullseye, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

Your package is only blocked because the arch:all binary package(s)
aren't built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure
doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I will
shortly do a no-changes source-only upload to DELAYED/15, closing this
bug. Please let me know if I should delay or cancel that upload.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=barman




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#970101: src:libhinawa: fails to migrate to testing for too long: reverse-dependency not ready yet

2020-09-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: libhinawa
Version: 1.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 968026
Control: affects -1 src:hinawa-utils

Dear maintainer(s),

As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as
having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:libhinawa in
its current version in unstable has been trying to migrate for 60 days
[2]. Hence, I am filing this bug.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult.
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or
its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that
hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

I have tagged this bug to only affect sid and bullseye, so it doesn't
affect (old-)stable.

If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libhinawa




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#970100: src:angelscript: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on mips64el

2020-09-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: angelscript
Version: 2.34.0+ds-1.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.34.0+ds-3.1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync

Dear maintainer(s),

As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 60 days as
having a Release Critical bug in testing. Your package src:angelscript
in its current version in unstable has been trying to migrate for 61
days [2]. Hence, I am filing this bug.

If a package is out of sync between unstable and testing for a longer
period, this usually means that bugs in the package in testing cannot be
fixed via unstable. Additionally, blocked packages can have impact on
other packages, which makes preparing for the release more difficult.
Finally, it often exposes issues with the package and/or
its (reverse-)dependencies. We expect maintainers to fix issues that
hamper the migration of their package in a timely manner.

This bug will trigger auto-removal when appropriate. As with all new
bugs, there will be at least 30 days before the package is auto-removed.

I have immediately closed this bug with the version in unstable, so if
that version or a later version migrates, this bug will no longer affect
testing. I have also tagged this bug to only affect sid and bullseye, so
it doesn't affect (old-)stable.

If you believe your package is unable to migrate to testing due to
issues beyond your control, don't hesitate to contact the Release Team.

Paul

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2020/02/msg5.html
[2] https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=angelscript




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#970099: CVE-2019-20907 CVE-2020-8492

2020-09-11 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: python2.7
Severity: important
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team 

Two security issues from past the 2.7.18 release. Backports
from 3.x are attached (I'm planning to submit these for 10.6).

Cheers,
Moritz
>From 47a2955589bdb1a114d271496ff803ad73f954b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Miss Islington (bot)"
 <31488909+miss-isling...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 05:36:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] bpo-39017: Avoid infinite loop in the tarfile module
 (GH-21454) (#21485)

Avoid infinite loop when reading specially crafted TAR files using the tarfile 
module
(CVE-2019-20907).
(cherry picked from commit 5a8d121a1f3ef5ad7c105ee378cc79a3eac0c7d4)

Co-authored-by: Rishi 

diff --git a/Lib/tarfile.py b/Lib/tarfile.py
index adf91d5..574a6bb 100644
--- a/Lib/tarfile.py
+++ b/Lib/tarfile.py
@@ -1400,6 +1400,8 @@ class TarInfo(object):
 
 length, keyword = match.groups()
 length = int(length)
+if length == 0:
+raise InvalidHeaderError("invalid header")
 value = buf[match.end(2) + 1:match.start(1) + length - 1]
 
 keyword = keyword.decode("utf8")
Backport of 0b297d4ff1c0e4480ad33acae793fbaf4bf015b4, trimmed down to the
fix for CVE-2020-8492

Co-Authored-By: Serhiy Storchaka 
diff --git a/Lib/urllib2.py b/Lib/urllib2.py
index 8b634ad..11a62a4 100644
--- a/Lib/urllib2.py
+++ b/Lib/urllib2.py
@@ -856,8 +856,15 @@ class AbstractBasicAuthHandler:
 
 # allow for double- and single-quoted realm values
 # (single quotes are a violation of the RFC, but appear in the wild)
-rx = re.compile('(?:.*,)*[ \t]*([^ \t]+)[ \t]+'
-'realm=(["\']?)([^"\']*)\\2', re.I)
+rx = re.compile('(?:^|,)'   # start of the string or ','
+'[ \t]*'# optional whitespaces
+'([^ \t]+)' # scheme like "Basic"
+'[ \t]+'# mandatory whitespaces
+# realm=xxx
+# realm='xxx'
+# realm="xxx"
+'realm=(["\']?)([^"\']*)\\2',
+re.I)
 
 # XXX could pre-emptively send auth info already accepted (RFC 2617,
 # end of section 2, and section 1.2 immediately after "credentials"


Bug#970065: [pkg-go] Bug#970065: golang-pault-go-archive: bullseye: /updates -> -security

2020-09-11 Thread Tianon Gravi
forwarded 970065 https://github.com/paultag/go-archive/pull/8
thanks

♥,
- Tianon
  4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36  4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4



Bug#967894: pan: Build-Depends on libgtkspell-dev, probably unnecessarily

2020-09-11 Thread Dominique Dumont
On vendredi 11 septembre 2020 18:47:33 CEST Simon McVittie wrote:
> From a brief look at configure.ac, it seems that might be just so it has
> the necessary GTK 2 macros to run autoreconf successfully?

You're right. 

I've forwarded your suggestion upstream:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pan/-/issues/116

Unfortunately, I've already uploaded pan to fix the gtkspell dependency so this 
patch will be part of next release (ETA unknown)

All the best

Dod



Bug#943552: update

2020-09-11 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Control: tags -1 help
--

All the dependencies are now packaged and I can now build
tracecompass. But when I try to use the launcher to launch the built
application I get errors. I have attached the error log. Will
appreciate any help or pointers to fix the problem.


-- 
Regards
Sudip
config.ini
org.eclipse.equinox.simpleconfigurator
Install location:
file:/home/sudip/trace-compass/
Configuration file:
file:/home/sudip/trace-compass/configuration/config.ini loaded
Configuration location:
file:/home/sudip/trace-compass/configuration/
Framework located:
file:/home/sudip/trace-compass/plugins/eclipse-osgi-3.15.300.jar
Loading extension: reference:file:eclipse-osgi-compatibility-state-1.1.800.jar
	eclipse.properties not found
Framework classpath:
file:/home/sudip/trace-compass/plugins/eclipse-osgi-3.15.300.jar
file:/home/sudip/trace-compass/plugins/
file:/home/sudip/trace-compass/plugins/eclipse-osgi-compatibility-state-1.1.800.jar
Debug options:
file:/home/sudip/.options not found
Time to load bundles: 37
Starting application: 1590
!SESSION 2020-09-07 20:36:38.848 ---
eclipse.buildId=unknown
java.version=11.0.8
java.vendor=Debian
BootLoader constants: OS=linux, ARCH=x86_64, WS=gtk, NL=en_GB
Command-line arguments:  -consolelog -clean -debug -data @noDefault

!ENTRY org.eclipse.e4.ui.workbench 4 0 2020-09-07 20:36:41.208
!MESSAGE Unable to create class 'org.eclipse.e4.ui.internal.workbench.addons.CommandProcessingAddon' from bundle '43'
!STACK 0
org.eclipse.e4.core.di.InjectionException: Unable to process "CommandProcessingAddon.broker": no actual value was found for the argument "IEventBroker".
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.InjectorImpl.reportUnresolvedArgument(InjectorImpl.java:482)
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.InjectorImpl.resolveRequestorArgs(InjectorImpl.java:473)
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.InjectorImpl.internalInject(InjectorImpl.java:129)
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.InjectorImpl.internalMake(InjectorImpl.java:405)
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.InjectorImpl.make(InjectorImpl.java:346)
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.contexts.ContextInjectionFactory.make(ContextInjectionFactory.java:227)
	at org.eclipse.e4.ui.internal.workbench.ReflectionContributionFactory.createFromBundle(ReflectionContributionFactory.java:94)
	at org.eclipse.e4.ui.internal.workbench.ReflectionContributionFactory.doCreate(ReflectionContributionFactory.java:60)
	at org.eclipse.e4.ui.internal.workbench.ReflectionContributionFactory.create(ReflectionContributionFactory.java:37)
	at org.eclipse.e4.ui.internal.workbench.swt.E4Application.createE4Workbench(E4Application.java:289)
	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.lambda$createAndRunWorkbench$1(Workbench.java:579)
	at org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:338)
	at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:557)
	at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:154)
	at org.eclipse.tracecompass.internal.tracing.rcp.ui.Application.start(Application.java:95)
	at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:203)
	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:137)
	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:107)
	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:401)
	at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:255)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:657)
	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:594)
	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1447)
	at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1420)

!ENTRY org.eclipse.e4.ui.workbench 4 0 2020-09-07 20:36:41.211
!MESSAGE Unable to create class 'org.eclipse.e4.ui.internal.workbench.addons.ContextProcessingAddon' from bundle '43'
!STACK 0
org.eclipse.e4.core.di.InjectionException: Unable to process "ContextProcessingAddon.broker": no actual value was found for the argument "IEventBroker".
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.InjectorImpl.reportUnresolvedArgument(InjectorImpl.java:482)
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.InjectorImpl.resolveRequestorArgs(InjectorImpl.java:473)
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.InjectorImpl.internalInject(InjectorImpl.java:129)
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.InjectorImpl.internalMake(InjectorImpl.java:405)
	at org.eclipse.e4.core.internal.di.InjectorImpl.make(InjectorImpl.java:346)
	at 

Bug#967894: pan: Build-Depends on libgtkspell-dev, probably unnecessarily

2020-09-11 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 17:47:58 +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> However pan still depends on libgtk2.0-dev even though Debian's build is done 
> with Gtk3.

>From a brief look at configure.ac, it seems that might be just so it has
the necessary GTK 2 macros to run autoreconf successfully?

If that's the case, you could replace

AM_PATH_GTK_2_0($GTK_REQUIRED,,exit 1,gthread)

with

PKG_CHECK_MODULES([GTK], [gtk+-2.0 >= $GTK_REQUIRED, gthread-2.0])

which is basically equivalent and should be upstreamable.

(AM_PATH_GTK_2_0 also does a test-build of some C code against GTK,
but that's basically unnecessary this decade, because pkg-config is
well-understood by now.)

smcv



Bug#969493: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Craig Small ) (Bug#969493: fixed in net-snmp 5.9+dfsg-2)

2020-09-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Craig,


On 11-09-2020 12:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the src:nanook package:
> 
> #969493: src:nanook: fails to migrate to testing for too long: maintainer 
> built arch:all binaries
> 
> It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters  
> (reply to Craig Small ).

I'm pretty sure you closed the wrong bug with your net-snmp upload. You
may want to close the right bug manually (no need to open this one, it's
rightfully closed).

Paul



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#970098: buster-pu: package orocos-kdl/1.4.0-7+deb10u1

2020-09-11 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

[ Reason ]
orocos-kdl ships KDLConfig.cmake providing a cmake variable with the
location of the header files. For Debian this is /usr/include, but it's
written as ${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../../../include. This breaks with
gcc > 5 and cmake < 3.16 if the path is added as -isystem to the
compiler.
This is the case for the ROS packages using orocos-kdl, as discussed in
https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/issues/26526.

[ Impact ]
If this is not approve the downstream users would need to add a
workaround to make use of the development package.

[ Tests ]
There is an autopkgtest in place, making sure that the headers are still
found. Also this was tested manually.

[ Risks ]
I think the change is trivial and I don't see a risk.

[ Checklist ]
  [X] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [X] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
  [X] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable

[ Changes ]
As /usr/include is a default include path, the patch simply removes the
extra path.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 9dc72bf..91e8724 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+orocos-kdl (1.4.0-7+deb10u2) buster; urgency=medium
+
+  * Add patch for include path
+KDLConfig.cmake exports ${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../../../include as an
+include path, which resolves to /usr/include. This breaks with gcc > 5 and
+cmake < 3.16 as discussed in
+https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/issues/26526.
+As /usr/include is a default include path, the patch simply removes the
+extra path.
+
+ -- Jochen Sprickerhof   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:15:58 +0200
+
 orocos-kdl (1.4.0-7+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
 
   * Add patch for python3 std string conversion (Closes: #956254)
diff --git a/debian/patches/0007-Don-t-export-usr-include-as-include-path.patch 
b/debian/patches/0007-Don-t-export-usr-include-as-include-path.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..017e061
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/0007-Don-t-export-usr-include-as-include-path.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+From: Jochen Sprickerhof 
+Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:06:41 +0200
+Subject: Don't export /usr/include as include path
+
+It's not needed and breaks cmake < 3.16.
+
+cf. https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/issues/26526
+---
+ orocos_kdl/KDLConfig.cmake.in | 2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/orocos_kdl/KDLConfig.cmake.in b/orocos_kdl/KDLConfig.cmake.in
+index a099c19..3a9b738 100644
+--- a/orocos_kdl/KDLConfig.cmake.in
 b/orocos_kdl/KDLConfig.cmake.in
+@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
+ #  orocos_kdl_PKGCONFIG_DIR - directory containing the .pc pkgconfig files
+ 
+ # Compute paths
+-set(orocos_kdl_INCLUDE_DIRS 
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/../../../include;@Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS@;@Eigen_INCLUDE_DIR@")
++set(orocos_kdl_INCLUDE_DIRS "@Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS@;@Eigen_INCLUDE_DIR@")
+ 
+ set(orocos_kdl_LIBRARIES orocos-kdl)
+ 
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index da119f6..2c9 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
 0002-Support-in-tree-compilation.patch
 0003-Don-t-install-OrocosKDLTargets.patch
 0005-Fixed-python3-std-string-conversion-issue.patch
+0007-Don-t-export-usr-include-as-include-path.patch


Bug#970087: ITP: mrc -- resource compiler to store data in ELF object files

2020-09-11 Thread Maarten L. Hekkelman
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Maarten L. Hekkelman" 

* Package name: mrc
  Version : 1.2.2
  Upstream Author : Maarten L. Hekkelman
* URL : http://github.com/mhekkel/mrc
* License : BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : resource compiler to store data in ELF object files

Many applications come with supplementary data. This data is usually
stored on disk as regular files. The disadvantage of this procedure is
that an application cannot simply be copied to another location or
computer and expected to function properly.

Resources are a way to overcome this problem by including all data
inside the executable file. The mrc resource compiler can create object
files containing both the data and an index. This data can then be
accessed from within an application using C++ classes. A header file
to include in your C++ application is provided. As a resource in mrc
of course.

I'm the author of libzeep, a C++ based web application framework and
in combination with mrc I can create web based application with a
C++ backend, all combined in a single executable that's easily
distributable.

Libzeep is already sponsored by the Med team.



Bug#969559: curl segmentation fauls on any https URL

2020-09-11 Thread Bernhard Übelacker
Dear Maintainer, hello Bruce Momjian,
with the last informations the issue is perfectly reproducible.

It looks like a use after free caused by statically stored
function pointers in libengine-pkcs11-openssl / libp11.

That led to following upstream bug:
  https://github.com/OpenSC/libp11/issues/328

This got fixed in this commit:
  
https://github.com/OpenSC/libp11/commit/e64496a198d4d2eb0310a22dc21be8b81367d319

This commit is not yet included in an upstream release tag.
Therefore this error is also visible in current testing.

I hope it is ok to reassign to libengine-pkcs11-openssl.

Kind regards,
Bernhard



Bug#970097: ITP: r-bioc-dupradar -- Assessment of duplication rates in RNA-Seq datasets

2020-09-11 Thread Steffen Moeller
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Subject: ITP: r-bioc-dupradar -- Assessment of duplication rates in RNA-Seq 
datasets
Package: wnpp
Owner: Steffen Moeller 
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: r-bioc-dupradar
  Version : 1.18.0
  Upstream Author : Sergi Sayols 
* URL : https://bioconductor.org/packages/dupRadar/
* License : GPL-3
  Programming Lang: GNU R
  Description : Assessment of duplication rates in RNA-Seq datasets
 Duplication rate quality control for RNA-Seq datasets.

Remark: This package is maintained by Debian R Packages Maintainers at
   https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-dupradar



Bug#955488: nat-rtsp-dkms: Does not build with kernel >= 5.3

2020-09-11 Thread Vincent Danjean
Source: nat-rtsp
Version: 0.7+4.18-0.1
Followup-For: Bug #955488

I've been hit by this bug (trying to use it with the
kernel 5.7.0-0.bpo.2-amd64).
My workaround has been to manually apply the patch from
https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/11468

  Regards,
Vincent

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 
'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armel, mipsel

Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)



Bug#878332: linux > 4.11: Raspberry pi 2 hangs at boot with lpae kernel

2020-09-11 Thread Philip Rinn
On 10.09.20 at 18:34, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> At the time of my bug report, I had not tested it yet. I checked right
> now, downloading an image from raspi.debian.net, and installing the
> -lpae kernel, I can confirm it boots correctly all the way to:
> 
> root@rpi2-20200910:~# uname -a
> Linux rpi2-20200910 4.19.0-10-armmp-lpae #1 SMP Debian 4.19.132-1 
> (2020-07-24) armv7l GNU/Linux

Thanks again for testing :-)



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#970096: buster-pu: package libdbi-perl/1.642-1+deb10u1

2020-09-11 Thread Xavier Guimard
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-p...@lists.debian.org

[ Reason ]
libdbi-perl is vulnerable to (low) security bug (CVE-2020-14392)

[ Impact ]
libdbi-perl may crash if an attacker can give a malformed login

[ Tests ]
No new test, current passed

[ Risks ]
This patch is very simple

[ Checklist ]
  [X] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [X] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
  [X] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable

[ Changes ]
Returned values are more tested
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d2e35cc..d0ad39a 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libdbi-perl (1.642-1+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
+
+  * Fix memory corruption in XS functions when Perl stack is reallocated
+(Closes: CVE-2020-14392)
+
+ -- Xavier Guimard   Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:04:13 +0200
+
 libdbi-perl (1.642-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   [ Xavier Guimard ]
diff --git a/debian/patches/CVE-2020-14392.patch 
b/debian/patches/CVE-2020-14392.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000..99c7a3e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/CVE-2020-14392.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
+Description: Fix memory corruption in XS functions when Perl stack is 
reallocated
+ Macro ST(*) returns pointer to Perl stack. Other Perl functions which use
+ Perl stack (e.g. eval) may reallocate Perl stack and therefore pointer
+ returned by ST(*) macro is invalid.
+ .
+ Construction like this:
+ .
+ ST(0) = dbd_db_login6_sv(dbh, imp_dbh, dbname, username, password, attribs) ? 
_sv_yes : _sv_no;
+ .
+ where dbd_db_login6_sv() driver function calls eval may lead to
+ reallocating Perl stack and therefore invalidating ST(0) pointer.
+ So that construction would cause memory corruption as left part of
+ assignment is resolved prior executing dbd_db_login6_sv() function.
+ .
+ Correct way how to handle this problem: First call dbd_db_login6_sv()
+ function and then call ST(0) to retrieve stack pointer.
+ .
+ In this patch are fixes all occurrences of such constructions.
+ .
+ When running perl under valgrind I got memory corruption in DBD::ODBC
+ driver in that dbd_db_login6_sv() function due to above problem.
+Author: Pali 
+Origin: upstream, https://github.com/perl5-dbi/dbi/commit/ea99b6aa
+Bug: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2020-14392
+Forwarded: not-needed
+Reviewed-By: Xavier Guimard 
+Last-Update: 2020-09-10
+
+--- a/DBI.xs
 b/DBI.xs
+@@ -5252,9 +5252,12 @@
+ SV *col
+ SV *ref
+ SV *attribs
++PREINIT:
++SV *ret;
+ CODE:
+ DBD_ATTRIBS_CHECK("bind_col", sth, attribs);
+-ST(0) = boolSV(dbih_sth_bind_col(sth, col, ref, attribs));
++ret = boolSV(dbih_sth_bind_col(sth, col, ref, attribs));
++ST(0) = ret;
+ (void)cv;
+ 
+ 
+@@ -5492,21 +5495,27 @@
+ FETCH(h, keysv)
+ SV *h
+ SV *keysv
++PREINIT:
++SV *ret;
+ CODE:
+-ST(0) = dbih_get_attr_k(h, keysv, 0);
++ret = dbih_get_attr_k(h, keysv, 0);
++ST(0) = ret;
+ (void)cv;
+ 
+ void
+ DELETE(h, keysv)
+ SV *h
+ SV *keysv
++PREINIT:
++SV *ret;
+ CODE:
+ /* only private_* keys can be deleted, for others DELETE acts like FETCH 
*/
+ /* because the DBI internals rely on certain handle attributes existing  
*/
+ if (strnEQ(SvPV_nolen(keysv),"private_",8))
+-ST(0) = hv_delete_ent((HV*)SvRV(h), keysv, 0, 0);
++ret = hv_delete_ent((HV*)SvRV(h), keysv, 0, 0);
+ else
+-ST(0) = dbih_get_attr_k(h, keysv, 0);
++ret = dbih_get_attr_k(h, keysv, 0);
++ST(0) = ret;
+ (void)cv;
+ 
+ 
+--- a/Driver.xst
 b/Driver.xst
+@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
+ #ifdef dbd_discon_all
+ 
+ # disconnect_all renamed and ALIAS'd to avoid length clash on VMS :-(
+-void
++bool
+ discon_all_(drh)
+ SV *drh
+ ALIAS:
+@@ -68,7 +68,9 @@
+ CODE:
+ D_imp_drh(drh);
+ PERL_UNUSED_VAR(ix);
+-ST(0) = dbd_discon_all(drh, imp_drh) ? _sv_yes : _sv_no;
++RETVAL = dbd_discon_all(drh, imp_drh);
++OUTPUT:
++RETVAL
+ 
+ #endif /* dbd_discon_all */
+ 
+@@ -102,7 +104,7 @@
+ MODULE = DBD::~DRIVER~PACKAGE = DBD::~DRIVER~::db
+ 
+ 
+-void
++bool
+ _login(dbh, dbname, username, password, attribs=Nullsv)
+ SV *dbh
+ SV *dbname
+@@ -118,14 +120,16 @@
+ char *p = (SvOK(password)) ? SvPV(password,lna) : (char*)"";
+ #endif
+ #ifdef dbd_db_login6_sv
+-ST(0) = dbd_db_login6_sv(dbh, imp_dbh, dbname, username, password, 
attribs) ? _sv_yes : _sv_no;
++RETVAL = dbd_db_login6_sv(dbh, imp_dbh, dbname, username, password, 
attribs);
+ #elif defined(dbd_db_login6)
+-ST(0) = dbd_db_login6(dbh, imp_dbh, SvPV_nolen(dbname), u, p, attribs) ? 
_sv_yes : _sv_no;
++RETVAL = dbd_db_login6(dbh, imp_dbh, SvPV_nolen(dbname), u, p, attribs);
+ #else
+ 

Bug#804722: git-buildpackage: import-dsc creates impractical merge commits after new upstream releases

2020-09-11 Thread Jonathan Dowland

I've been hitting this recently and wondering whether the current
behaviour is by accident or design (I'm surprised it's at least five
years old) but I concur with the filer that a much simpler, two-step
merge (merge upstream, then apply debian diff as the next commit) would
be *far* easier to work with. Do the maintainers have a view?


--
Jonathan Dowland



Bug#967894: pan: Build-Depends on libgtkspell-dev, probably unnecessarily

2020-09-11 Thread Dominique Dumont
On mardi 4 août 2020 15:26:06 CEST you wrote:
> Looking at the buildd log, it seems like libgtkspell-dev is probably
> unnecessary - presumably it's left over from pan's GTK 2 history.

You're right. I'll remove this dependency.

However pan still depends on libgtk2.0-dev even though Debian's build is done 
with Gtk3. I'll check with upstream what's going on..

All the best

Dod



Bug#775147: emscripten: does not work at all with optimization enabled

2020-09-11 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Sylvestre Ledru  wrote:
> emscripten developers implemented fastcomp, a LLVM backend. This 
> requires a patched version of LLVM and this could not go in Debian 
> packages.

fastcomb is no longer default backend since emscripten v1.39.0:
> v1.39.0: 10/18/2019
> ---
>  - The emsdk defaults to the upstream backend (instead of fastcomp) 
>from this release onward (but both backends are still fully 
>supported). See 
>https://emscripten.org/docs/compiling/WebAssembly.html#backends


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

signature.asc
Description: signature


Bug#961843: buster-pu: package lighttpd/1.4.53-4

2020-09-11 Thread MichaIng
Since two months have been passed, may I ask about the status of this 
request? The requested debdiff has been attached above and these patches 
fix potential and actual security issues in backend applications which 
can be hard to debug or even recognise (meaning a security issue exists 
without the knowledge of the admin/user).


Many thanks for your efforts on this.

Best regards,

Micha



Bug#970011: linux: missing build dependency on kernel-wedge in stage1 build

2020-09-11 Thread Ben Hutchings
Control: tag -1 pending

On Thu, 2020-09-10 at 06:59 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: linux
> Version: 5.8.7-1
> Severity: important
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: rebootstrap
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm run into a bootstrap failure caused by linux:
> https://jenkins.debian.net/job/rebootstrap_hppa_gcc10/9/
> > dh_prep
> > dh_prep: warning: All requested packages have been excluded (e.g. via a 
> > Build-Profile or due to architecture restrictions).
> > kernel-wedge install-files 5.8.0-1
> > bash: kernel-wedge: command not found
> > make[2]: Leaving directory '/tmp/buildd/linux/linux-5.8.7'
> > make[2]: *** [debian/rules.real:573: install-udeb_hppa] Error 127
> > make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/buildd/linux/linux-5.8.7'
> > make[1]: *** [debian/rules.gen:89: binary-arch_hppa] Error 2
> > make: *** [debian/rules:43: binary-arch] Error 2
> > dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary-arch subprocess returned exit 
> > status 2
> 
> What we see here is that kernel-wedge is not found while cross building
> linux with the stage1 profile for hppa. This seems to be a recent thing.
> It used to work earlier. I'm not sure yet, how many other architectures
> are affected.

This is specific to hppa.  It recently gained transitional metapackages
with no build-profiles set, and that made the condition here true:

install-udeb_$(ARCH):
# Logically we should check for %-di here, but that would break test builds
ifneq (,$(filter linux-image-%,$(packages_enabled)))
...
endif
endif  # enabled

> A kernel-wedge dependency is there, but it is tagged . That
> used to be true.

It should still be true; there is no reason to run kernel-wedge, and it
would fail if it was installed anyway.

[...]
> While looking into linux' build profiles I was wondering whether we
> still need stage1. linux gained a number of functional profiles
> including pkg.linux.nokernel, pkg.linux.notools and pkg.linux.nosource.
> Their combination does not exactly reproduce stage1, but it is close.
> I'm wondering whether we can simply switch any stage1 user to using the
> combination of these three and be done. I haven't tried whether this
> actually works yet, but I believe it is feasible and you get the idea.

I think that would be more fragile than the clearly defined stage1.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Never put off till tomorrow what you can avoid all together.




signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#970094: ITP: r-cran-ragg -- Graphic Devices Based on AGG

2020-09-11 Thread Steffen Moeller
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Subject: ITP: r-cran-ragg -- Graphic Devices Based on AGG
Package: wnpp
Owner: Steffen Moeller 
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: r-cran-ragg
  Version : 0.3.1
  Upstream Author : Thomas Lin Pedersen
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=ragg
* License : MIT
  Programming Lang: GNU R
  Description : Graphic Devices Based on AGG
 Anti-Grain Geometry (AGG) is a high-quality and high-performance
 2D drawing library. The 'ragg' package provides a set of graphic devices
 based on AGG to use as alternative to the raster devices provided through
 the 'grDevices' package.

Remark: This package is maintained by Debian R Packages Maintainers at
   https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-ragg



Bug#970092: ITP: r-cran-downlit -- Syntax Highlighting and Automatic Linking

2020-09-11 Thread Steffen Moeller
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Subject: ITP: r-cran-downlit -- Syntax Highlighting and Automatic Linking
Package: wnpp
Owner: Steffen Moeller 
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: r-cran-downlit
  Version : 0.1.0
  Upstream Author : Hadley Wickham, RStudio
* URL : https://cran.r-project.org/package=downlit
* License : MIT
  Programming Lang: GNU R
  Description : Syntax Highlighting and Automatic Linking
 Syntax highlighting of R code, specifically designed
 for the needs of 'RMarkdown' packages like 'pkgdown', 'hugodown', and
 'bookdown'. It includes linking of function calls to their documentation
 on the web, and automatic translation of ANSI escapes in output to the
 equivalent HTML.

Remark: This package is maintained by Debian R Packages Maintainers at
   https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-downlit



Bug#911189: gpgme-json packaging

2020-09-11 Thread Sascha Wilde
Sascha Wilde  writes:
> As a first step I created a merge request to deploy gpgme-json together
> with the library:
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpgme/-/merge_requests/1

After realizing that the current MR breaks multi arch compatibility for
the library I revised it and added a new -bin package, which for now
only provides gpgme-json.

I also added a rudimentary man page for gpgme-json.

> Next I will look into creating specific packages with browser
> manifests...

I have implemented that and created a new merge request:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpgme/-/merge_requests/2

In addition to the new -bin package two more new packages are created:
- libgpgme-chromium-native-messaging
- libgpgme-firefox-native-messaging

Each of the packages provides a native messaging manifest for the
respective browser which allows using GPGME via gpgme-json for a set of
well known extensions.  For now the only supported extension is
mailvelope but more could be easily added later on.

Upstream encourages distributors to create manifest packages for their
distributions, therefor I think adding these packages here is The Right
Thing To Do™.

Some remarks/requests for comment:

1. Currently the manifest installed for chromium is installed as:
 /etc/chromium/native-messaging-hosts/gpgmejson.json

   Upstream recommends a slightly different file name schema[0]:
 /etc/chromium/native-messaging-hosts/com.my_company.my_application.json

   As you can see, following this recommendation would mean adding a
   domain.  I'm not sure whether to follow this scheme, and if so, which
   domain to add:  org.debian, org.gnupg or ..?

2. The manifest for chromium is automatically marked configuration file,
   as it resides under /etc, which IMO is correct.  A sysadmin might
   want to edit the manifest, e.g. to add the IDs of further
   extensions.

   However: the manifest for firefox is installed as

 /usr/lib/mozilla/native-messaging-hosts/gpgmejson.json

   (This is dictated by firefox searching for global manifests in that
   place).  So it is not automatically marked as configuration.  And as
   of compatibility level 12 of debhelper it seems to be no longer
   possible to mark the file as configuration manually (dh_installdeb
   simply ignores any debian/package.conffiles.

   Is there a way to work around this?  For the reason given above I
   think the manifest should be marked as a conffile for firefox,
   too...

cheers,
sascha

[0] https://developer.chrome.com/apps/nativeMessaging
-- 
Sascha Wilde  OpenPGP key: 4365844304077279
http://www.intevation.de/  http://www.intevation.de/~wilde/
Intevation GmbH, Neuer Graben 17, 49074 Osnabrück; AG Osnabrück, HR B 18998
Geschäftsführer:   Frank Koormann,  Bernhard Reiter,  Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#970091: RFS: xlbiff/4.3-1 [ITA] -- Displays From and Subject lines of your new mail

2020-09-11 Thread Stephen Gildea
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xlbiff":

 * Package name: xlbiff
   Version : 4.3-1
   Upstream Author : e...@edsantiago.com (Ed Santiago)
 * URL : http://www.edsantiago.com/xlbiff/
 * License : Expat
 * Vcs : https://github.com/edsantiago/xlbiff
   Section : mail

It builds those binary packages:

  xlbiff - Displays From and Subject lines of your new mail

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/xlbiff/

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xlbiff/xlbiff_4.3-1.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

 xlbiff (4.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new maintainer (closes: #485647)
   * new upstream version:
 - rename manual page from xlbiff.1x to xlbiff.1
 - change default mail path directory from /var/spool/mail to /var/mail
 - update default font resource (#743835)
   * distribute example bulk support files: README.bulk, Bcheck, Bscan
   * remove xlbiff.form from /usr/share/doc; it is already in /usr/share/mh


 < Stephen



Bug#970090: lvm2: Cache mode "writeback" is not compatible with cache policy "cleaner".

2020-09-11 Thread Marc Lehmann
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.03.02-3
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

when trying to use the cleaner cachepolicy in writeback mode, lvm2 fails like 
this:

   Cache mode "writeback" is not compatible with cache policy "cleaner".

However, the kernel suports this combination, which is very useful to
avoid cache migrations but sitll have a hotspot writeback cache.

It would be nice if lvm2 also supported this combination (can't see why it
dosn't, in fact).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.5
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), 
(500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 
'testing'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, x32

Kernel: Linux 5.6.19-050619-generic (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages lvm2 depends on:
ii  dmeventd  2:1.02.155-3
ii  dmsetup   2:1.02.171-3
ii  libaio1   0.3.112-3
ii  libblkid1 2.33.1-0.1
ii  libc6 2.30-4
ii  libdevmapper-event1.02.1  2:1.02.171-3
ii  libdevmapper1.02.12:1.02.171-3
ii  libreadline5  5.2+dfsg-3+b13
ii  libselinux1   3.1-2
ii  libsystemd0   246.4-1
ii  libudev1  241-7~deb10u4
ii  lsb-base  10.2019051400

Versions of packages lvm2 recommends:
ii  thin-provisioning-tools  0.7.6-2.1

lvm2 suggests no packages.

-- Configuration Files:
/etc/lvm/lvmlocal.conf changed [not included]

-- debconf information excluded



Bug#968567: linux-image-4.19.0-10-amd64: kernel failure when writing on a GFS2 partition

2020-09-11 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Daniel, hi Nicolas,

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:47:20AM +, Craig, Daniel (CASS, Marsfield) wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I can confirm the existence of this CPU soft-lock bug with gfs2.
> 
> I won't worry about reproducing the kernel bug message, but I have
> done a bit of digging and if I revert the following commit, added in
> the 4.19.130 release then this fixes issue for me.
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-4.19.y=c91cffd0fd010c06d67f3a9a528b858ce28c60fb
> 
> Note that the problem is still present in the latest upstream
> release in the 4.19 series (4.19.144)
> 
> I've reported this bug in the kernel bugzilla, referenced here:
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209217

Upstream did had a look at this see (you both were CC'ed on that
thread though) the thread starting at

https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20200910194319.GA131386@eldamar.local/

and suggested that upstream commit
cbcc89b630447ec7836aa2b9242d9bb1725f5a61 is definitely needed.

Would it be possible for you to test a build with that commit added on
top? (Note the patch would need a slight refresh when applying on top
of 4.19.144 for context changes).

https://kernel-team.pages.debian.net/kernel-handbook/ch-common-tasks.html#s4.2.2
explains how to test a single patch on top of the packaging, or you
can try 4.19.144 with the cherry-picked commit.

That would be much appreciated.

Regards,
Salvatore



Bug#970088: systemd: Add trigger to update systemd-boot installation

2020-09-11 Thread Jan Luca Naumann
Package: systemd
Version: 246.4-1
Severity: wishlist

Dear maintainers,

it would be very nice if it would be possible to add a trigger to the postinst
of the systemd package which runs "bootctl update" if systemd-boot is installed
on the machine. Could you add this feature?

Thank you and best regards,
Jan

-- Package-specific info:

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 
'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages systemd depends on:
ii  adduser  3.118
ii  libacl1  2.2.53-8
ii  libapparmor1 2.13.4-3
ii  libaudit11:2.8.5-3+b1
ii  libblkid12.36-3
ii  libc62.31-3
ii  libcap2  1:2.43-1
ii  libcrypt11:4.4.17-1
ii  libcryptsetup12  2:2.3.4-1
ii  libgcrypt20  1.8.6-2
ii  libgnutls30  3.6.15-1
ii  libgpg-error01.38-2
ii  libidn2-02.3.0-1
ii  libip4tc21.8.5-3
ii  libkmod2 27+20200310-2
ii  liblz4-1 1.9.2-2
ii  liblzma5 5.2.4-1+b1
ii  libmount12.36-3
ii  libpam0g 1.3.1-5
ii  libpcre2-8-0 10.34-7
ii  libseccomp2  2.4.3-1+b1
ii  libselinux1  3.1-2
ii  libsystemd0  246.4-1
ii  libzstd1 1.4.5+dfsg-4
ii  mount2.36-3
ii  systemd-timesyncd [time-daemon]  246.4-1
ii  util-linux   2.36-3

Versions of packages systemd recommends:
ii  dbus  1.12.20-1

Versions of packages systemd suggests:
ii  policykit-10.105-29
ii  systemd-container  246.4-1

Versions of packages systemd is related to:
ii  dracut   050+65-1
pn  initramfs-tools  
ii  libnss-systemd   246.4-1
ii  libpam-systemd   246.4-1
ii  udev 246.4-1

-- no debconf information



Bug#970089: lua-say: autopkgtest failure

2020-09-11 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Source: lua-say
Version: 1.3-1-4
Severity: normal
Tag: patch

Dear Maintainer,

lua-say has an autopkgtest failure at the moment because a warning is raised in 
stderr:

autopkgtest [09:19:35]: test dh-lua-tests:  - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - 
- - - - - -
dh-lua-tests FAIL stderr: dh: warning: Compatibility levels before 10 
are deprecated (level 9 in use)


We have two options to fix this issue: 1) bump the debhelper compatibility 
level version to something greater than 9 (preferred solution); or 2) patch the 
d/t/control to add the allow-stderr restriction.

This is blocking dh-lua/27 migration in Ubuntu, therefore I am uploading 2) to 
Ubuntu right now. FWIW the patch is attached.

-- 
Lucas Kanashiro

diff --color -Nru lua-say-1.3-1/debian/changelog lua-say-1.3-1.new/debian/changelog
--- lua-say-1.3-1/debian/changelog	2016-07-25 12:08:30.0 -0300
+++ lua-say-1.3-1.new/debian/changelog	2020-09-11 09:46:44.64123 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+lua-say (1.3-1-5) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * d/t/control: add allow-stderr restriction. It fixes an autopkgtest
+regression.
+
+ -- Lucas Kanashiro   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:45:56 -0300
+
 lua-say (1.3-1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Add lua-busted to test dependencies, so tests pass on CI
diff --color -Nru lua-say-1.3-1/debian/tests/control lua-say-1.3-1.new/debian/tests/control
--- lua-say-1.3-1/debian/tests/control	2016-07-25 11:48:43.0 -0300
+++ lua-say-1.3-1.new/debian/tests/control	2020-09-11 09:20:13.098023456 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
 Tests: dh-lua-tests
-Restrictions: rw-build-tree
+Restrictions: rw-build-tree, allow-stderr
 Depends: @, dh-lua, lua-busted


Bug#969206: 969206: additional info

2020-09-11 Thread Andrius Merkys
Hello,

I have attempted patching out dependencies in Gemfile, namely, rails and
roadie-rails, to accept later major releases. However, I ran into the
following autopkgtest failures.

First of all, 'service apache2 restart' fails in autopkgtest on schroot.
It tries to execute 'systemctl', which apparently is not there, as
systemd package does not seem to be installed there. Nevertheless, this
issue could be circumvented by replacing 'service apache2 restart' with
'apachectl restart' (not sure about side effects, but at least Apache2
starts).

With this patch I continued with autopkgtest 'command1', which checks
whether the main page of Redmine loads. And this check failed with
"Redmine 500 error", with the following message in error log:

Completed 500 Internal Server Error in 208ms (ActiveRecord: 25.5ms |
Allocations: 74866)

NotImplementedError (Subclasses must implement a find_templates(name,
prefix, partial, details, locals = []) method):

config/initializers/10-patches.rb:74:in `block in find_all'
config/initializers/10-patches.rb:69:in `find_all'
lib/redmine/sudo_mode.rb:63:in `sudo_mode'

I have little idea, but this might be a signal of incompatibility with
new ruby-rails.

Andrius



Bug#935203: tomcat9: systemd and /var/lib/tomcat9/policy/

2020-09-11 Thread David Magda

Hello,

I've just installed the following from stretch-backports:

$ dpkg --list | grep tomcat9 | cut -c1-60
ii  libtomcat9-java 9.0.16-4~bpo9+1
ii  tomcat9 9.0.16-4~bpo9+1
ii  tomcat9-common  9.0.16-4~bpo9+1

And got the following error on initial start-up:

	[2020-09-10 14:59:31] [info] mkdir: cannot create directory 
‘/var/lib/tomcat9/policy’: Read-only file system


I then did a 'mkdir' and tried to do a chown/chgrp to the tomcat 
user/group and got:


	[2020-09-10 15:12:39] [info] rm: cannot remove 
'/var/lib/tomcat9/policy': Read-only file system


I copied over the config file:

$ sudo cp -p /lib/systemd/system/tomcat9.service /etc/systemd/system/

And tried adding the following line:

ReadWritePaths=/var/lib/tomcat9/policy/

Did not help. I then put:

ReadWritePaths=/var/lib/tomcat9/

and things were okay.



Further, on package installation, the package was expecting a "tomcat" 
group because a 'chown' failed:


Creating config file /etc/tomcat9/tomcat-users.xml with new version
chown: invalid group: ‘root:tomcat’

I did a 'vigr' and created a "tomcat" group with the same GID as 
"tomcat8" and that allowed the installation to finish.




Bug#970086: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Control: tags -1 + patch

this is the last package preventing migration of python-defaults to testing.
Uploading that fix to the delayed queue.
diff -Nru android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/changelog android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/changelog
--- android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/changelog	2020-05-10 10:32:25.0 +0200
+++ android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/changelog	2020-09-11 13:37:07.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+android-platform-build (1:8.1.0+r23-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Explicitly build using dh-python and python2. Closes: #970086.
+
+ -- Matthias Klose   Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:37:07 +0200
+
 android-platform-build (1:8.1.0+r23-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Team upload.
diff -Nru android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/control android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/control
--- android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/control	2020-05-10 10:32:25.0 +0200
+++ android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/control	2020-09-11 13:37:07.0 +0200
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
Chirayu Desai 
 Build-Depends:
  debhelper-compat (= 12),
- javahelper
+ javahelper,
+ dh-python, python2
 Build-Depends-Arch:
  android-libandroidfw-dev (>= 1:8.1.0+r23~),
  android-liblog-dev (>= 1:8.1.0+r23~),
@@ -76,7 +77,7 @@
 Architecture: all
 Depends:
  ${misc:Depends},
- python:any
+ ${python:Depends}
 Description: Tools from AOSP that process event-log-tags files
  This package contains Python scripts from AOSP repository platform/build that
  process event-log-tags (.logtags) files. It contains:
diff -Nru android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/rules android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/rules
--- android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/rules	2020-05-10 10:32:25.0 +0200
+++ android-platform-build-8.1.0+r23/debian/rules	2020-09-11 13:37:07.0 +0200
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 	jh_build --javacopts="-source 7" --no-javadoc --main=com.android.signtos.SignTos $@ tools/signtos/
 
 %:
-	dh $@ --with javahelper
+	dh $@ --with javahelper,python2
 
 override_dh_auto_build-arch: makeparallel zipalign ziptime
 


Bug#966846: Kernel panic (4.19.0-10): RIP __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb

2020-09-11 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Sébastien,

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:41:16AM +0200, Sébastien NOBILI wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> More than a week after, no problem with this build, working fine
> 24/7.

Thanks for confirming that. We are planning to rebase the version for
the next point release and so will contain the fix.

Regards,
Salvatore



Bug#970086: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye

2020-09-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:android-platform-build
Version: 1:8.1.0+r23-4
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: py2unversioned

Python2 becomes end-of-live upstream, and Debian aims to remove
Python2 from the distribution, as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2019/07/msg00080.html

We will keep some Python2 package as discussed in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2020/07/msg00039.html
but removing the unversioned python packages python-minimal, python,
python-dev, python-dbg, python-doc.

Your package either build-depends, depends on one of those packages.
Please either convert these packages to Python3, or if that is not
possible, replaces the dependencies on the unversioned Python
packages with one of the python2 dependencies (python2, python2-dev,
python2-dbg, python2-doc).

Please check for dependencies, build dependencies AND autopkg tests.

If there are questions, please refer to the wiki page for the removal:
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal, or ask for help on IRC
#debian-python, or the debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org mailing list.



Bug#969889: linux-image-5.8.0-1-amd64: fails to load

2020-09-11 Thread laren99

duplicate
Bug #969889

linux-image-5.8.0-1-amd64: fails to load kernel modules, X does not work
Reverting to:
linux-image-5.7.0-3-amd64 works

http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable non-free contrib main
nvidia graphics

Lars



Bug#940427: RFA: golang-github-syncthing-notify

2020-09-11 Thread Jai Flack
> For now, I intend to do my best to keep maintaining this package.
> However, I will probably retitle this bug with the 'O:' prefix at some
> point, indicating that I have orphaned it.

Hi, I'm interested in helping out the Debian Go team and considering
this is something I use constantly, I would definitely be willing to
help maintain it.

> Feel free to upload a new version of the package and remove me from the
> uploaders in debian/control.
> 
> Feel free to contact me with any questions. Also note that I always
> willing to sponsor uploads!

I had a look at the tracker and it seems this just requires an update
and standards bump at the moment, is this correct?

--
Thanks,
Jai



Bug#970085: Missing qml module dependencies for ausweisapp2

2020-09-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 9/11/20 11:22 AM, Allison Karlitskaya wrote:
> Installing ausweisapp2 on a relatively clean system (ie: no other Qt/QML
> apps) misses installation of some required dependencies:
> Installing the following extra dependencies fixes the problem:
> (...)
> $ sudo apt install qml-module-qtgraphicaleffects qml-module-qtqml
> qml-module-qtquick-layouts

There should really be a meta-package for this QML stuff which pulls in all the
necessary packages.

Since I cannot test the package on all possible desktop configurations, these
situations will probably happen again in the future when new QML dependencies
are pulled in.

I'll fix that in the next upload *sigh*.

Adrian

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913



Bug#970084: corosync: Corosync becomes unresponsive and disconnects from the rest of the cluster when primary link is lost

2020-09-11 Thread Valentin Vidic
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:45:54AM +0200, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> This might be a knet problem. Can you test if just installing knet
> libs from backports with corosync 3.0.1-2+deb10u1 solves the issue
> you are seeing?

Also knet update for buster has not been approved yet, but can be
tracked here:

  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950488

-- 
Valentin



Bug#970085: Missing qml module dependencies for ausweisapp2

2020-09-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 9/11/20 12:00 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 9/11/20 11:22 AM, Allison Karlitskaya wrote:
> Since I cannot test the package on all possible desktop configurations, these
> situations will probably happen again in the future when new QML dependencies
> are pulled in.

And I just realized my previous change added the dependencies to the 
Build-Dependencies
field not to the Depends field of the binary package AusweisApp2 [1].

Adrian

> [1] 
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ausweisapp2/-/commit/c13b4b1f5cb034452a07bfa485c54df2b8d1a372

-- 
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913



Bug#970084: corosync: Corosync becomes unresponsive and disconnects from the rest of the cluster when primary link is lost

2020-09-11 Thread Valentin Vidic
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:22:19AM +0200, Eugen Wick wrote:
> * Tests with Corosync 3.0.3 from debian testing.
> We installed packages from debian testing and fulfilled dependencies from
> debian backports.
> 
> #
> apt install libnozzle1=1.16-2~bpo10+1 libknet1=1.16-2~bpo10+1 libnl-3-200
> libnl-route-3-200 libknet-dev=1.16-2~bpo10+1 ./corosync_3.0.3-2_amd64.deb
> ./libcorosync-common4_3.0.3-2_amd64.deb
> #
> The described problem does not occur with the 3.0.3 version from debian
> testing.

This might be a knet problem. Can you test if just installing knet
libs from backports with corosync 3.0.1-2+deb10u1 solves the issue
you are seeing?

-- 
Valentin



Bug#966846: Kernel panic (4.19.0-10): RIP __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb

2020-09-11 Thread Sébastien NOBILI

Hi,

More than a week after, no problem with this build, working fine 24/7.

Sébastien



Bug#970085: Missing qml module dependencies for ausweisapp2

2020-09-11 Thread Allison Karlitskaya
Package: ausweisapp2
Version: 1.20.2-1

Installing ausweisapp2 on a relatively clean system (ie: no other Qt/QML
apps) misses installation of some required dependencies:

$ sudo apt install ausweisapp2
...
$ AusweisApp2
...
default2020.09.11 11:19:14.860 398030 W unknown(unknown:0)
   : QQmlApplicationEngine failed
to load component
default2020.09.11 11:19:14.860 398030 W unknown(/qml/main.qml:32)
   :
qrc:/qml/main.qml:32:1: module "QtGraphicalEffects" is not installed
default2020.09.11 11:19:14.860 398030 W unknown(/qml/main.qml:30)
   :
qrc:/qml/main.qml:30:1: module "QtQuick" is not installed
default2020.09.11 11:19:14.860 398030 W unknown(/qml/main.qml:28)
   :
qrc:/qml/main.qml:28:1: module "QtQml" is not installed
default2020.09.11 11:19:14.860 398030 W unknown(/qml/main.qml:32)
   :
qrc:/qml/main.qml:32:1: module "QtGraphicalEffects" is not installed
default2020.09.11 11:19:14.860 398030 W unknown(/qml/main.qml:30)
   :
qrc:/qml/main.qml:30:1: module "QtQuick" is not installed
default2020.09.11 11:19:14.860 398030 W unknown(/qml/main.qml:28)
   :
qrc:/qml/main.qml:28:1: module "QtQml" is not installed
default2020.09.11 11:19:14.860 398030 W unknown(/qml/main.qml:32)
   :
qrc:/qml/main.qml:32:1: module "QtGraphicalEffects" is not installed
default2020.09.11 11:19:14.860 398030 W unknown(/qml/main.qml:30)
   :
qrc:/qml/main.qml:30:1: module "QtQuick" is not installed
default2020.09.11 11:19:14.860 398030 W unknown(/qml/main.qml:28)
   :
qrc:/qml/main.qml:28:1: module "QtQml" is not installed
...

(and the main app window isn't shown).


Installing the following extra dependencies fixes the problem:

$ sudo apt install qml-module-qtgraphicaleffects qml-module-qtqml
qml-module-qtquick-layouts


Thanks for packaging AusweisApp!  This makes my life a lot easier. :)


Bug#970084: corosync: Corosync becomes unresponsive and disconnects from the rest of the cluster when primary link is lost

2020-09-11 Thread Eugen Wick
Package: corosync
Version: 3.0.1-2+deb10u1
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

* What led up to the situation?
** 2 Node Cluster Corosync 3.0.1 on Debian Buster.
** 2 Knet Links - ring0 on eth0 (front facing if) ring1 on eth1
(back-to-back link).
** Services running on cluster-node01.
** Cluster is running just fine, both nodes are online and see each other.
** crm_mon shows 2 online nodes and running resources without errors.

* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?
For failover testing we disconnected the eth0 interface on the active node
(cluster-node01).

* What was the outcome of this action?
** Situation on the active node (cluster-node01)
Corosync on the node becomes unresponsive. It does not respond to commands
like corosync-cfgtool and corosync-quorumtool.
in crm_mon however the cluster status just looks fine. It claims both nodes
are online and services are healthy.
corosync logs however indicates that the cluster is disconnected.
### corosync.log 
Sep 11 10:06:45 [1946] cluster-node01 corosync warning [MAIN  ] Totem is
unable to form a cluster because of an operating system or network fault
(reason: totem is continuously in gather state). The most common cause of
this message is that the local firewall is configured improperly.
#

** Situation on the passive node (cluster-node02)
Corosync does respond to commands like corosync-cfgtool and shows that
cluster-node01 is offline on all links.

#
### corosync.log ###
Sep 11 10:06:09 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync info[KNET  ] link: host:
1 link: 0 is down
Sep 11 10:06:09 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync info[KNET  ] host: host:
1 has 1 active links
Sep 11 10:06:10 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync notice  [TOTEM ] Token has
not been received in 2250 ms
Sep 11 10:06:11 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync notice  [TOTEM ] A processor
failed, forming new configuration.
Sep 11 10:06:15 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync notice  [TOTEM ] A new
membership (2:16) was formed. Members left: 1
Sep 11 10:06:15 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync notice  [TOTEM ] Failed to
receive the leave message. failed: 1
Sep 11 10:06:15 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync warning [CPG   ] downlist
left_list: 1 received
Sep 11 10:06:15 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync notice  [QUORUM] Members[1]:
2
Sep 11 10:06:15 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync notice  [MAIN  ] Completed
service synchronization, ready to provide service.
Sep 11 10:06:16 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync info[KNET  ] link: host:
1 link: 1 is down
Sep 11 10:06:16 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync info[KNET  ] host: host:
1 has 0 active links
Sep 11 10:06:16 [1941] cluster-node02 corosync warning [KNET  ] host: host:
1 has no active links
#

#
## corosync-cfgtool -s ##
root@cluster-node02:~# corosync-cfgtool -s
Printing link status.
Local node ID 2
LINK ID 0
addr= ###.###.###.###
status:
node 0: link enabled:1  link connected:0
node 1: link enabled:1  link connected:1
LINK ID 1
addr= ###.###.###.###
status:
node 0: link enabled:1  link connected:1
node 1: link enabled:0  link connected:1
#


#
# crm_mon -rfA1 ###
root@cluster-node02:~# crm_mon -rfA1
Stack: corosync
Current DC: cluster-node02 (version 2.0.1-9e909a5bdd) - partition with
quorum
Last updated: Fri Sep 11 10:45:53 2020
Last change: Fri Sep 11 10:42:26 2020 by root via cibadmin on cluster-node02

2 nodes configured
7 resources configured

Online: [ cluster-node02 ]
OFFLINE: [ cluster-node01 ]
#

Pacemaker does therefore try to perform a failover.

* What outcome did you expect instead?
With our configuration the cluster should not take any action and both
nodes should see each other on link1.

* Tests with Corosync 3.0.3 from debian testing.
We installed packages from debian testing and fulfilled dependencies from
debian backports.

#
apt install libnozzle1=1.16-2~bpo10+1 libknet1=1.16-2~bpo10+1 libnl-3-200
libnl-route-3-200 libknet-dev=1.16-2~bpo10+1 ./corosync_3.0.3-2_amd64.deb
./libcorosync-common4_3.0.3-2_amd64.deb
#
The described problem does not occur with the 3.0.3 version from debian
testing.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.5
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (550, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-10-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages corosync depends on:
ii  adduser  3.118
ii  init-system-helpers  1.56+nmu1
ii  libc62.28-10
ii  libcfg7  3.0.1-2+deb10u1
ii  libcmap4 3.0.1-2+deb10u1
ii  libcorosync-common4  3.0.1-2+deb10u1
ii  libcpg4  

Bug#961584: lxc-stop fails with exit code 1

2020-09-11 Thread Iñaki Malerba
Hi Pebs,

Thanks for checking this.

On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 23:23:30 +0200 Pierre-Elliott =?utf-8?B?QsOpY3Vl?=
 wrote:>
> LXC's devs told me that 4.0.4 should solve it. I'm uploading this
> release now. Please don't hesitate to tell me if it helps.

Run a pipeline removing the pinning of lxc, and the behaviour seems to
be the same.

Image building:
https://salsa.debian.org/ina/pipeline/-/jobs/990332
> Setting up lxc (1:4.0.4-1) ..

Running lxc:
https://salsa.debian.org/ina/pipeline/-/jobs/990352
> : failure: ['sudo', 'timeout', '600', 'lxc-stop',
'--quiet', '--kill', '--name', 'ci-254-b2fcad5f'] failed (exit status 1,
stderr '')

Please let me know if you want us to test something else.

Abrazos,

> 
> -- 
> Pierre-Elliott Bécue
> GPG: 9AE0 4D98 6400 E3B6 7528  F493 0D44 2664 1949 74E2
> It's far easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.

-- 
- ina



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#960863: Help needed with perl-tk NMU

2020-09-11 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-=| Dominic Hargreaves, 10.09.2020 21:21:51 +0100 |=-
> Hi all
> 
> I didn't hear back from Colin, and so I think in order to unblock
> the perl 5.32 transition we need to NMU either a targeted fix for
> perl 5.32 compatibility, or the new upstream release. I'm not sure
> which is more appropriate given the time since the last release in
> Debian.
> 
> Any takers? I'm a bit short on time myself, these days.
> 
> See http://perl.debian.net/ for the test repository you might need
> to verify fixes.

I tried the "new upstream release" route because otherwise there would 
be several patches to import, one of them adding 10k-lines ppport.h

The result is at https://salsa.debian.org/dmn/perl-tk and builds with 
per 5.32. There are many lintian/hardening warnings, but since this is 
a NMU, the changes are bare minimum.

I haven't tested the resulting package yet, will have to find a way to 
do so without disturbing the rest of the system. (perhaps docker+vnc 
would help).


Cheers,
dam



Bug#969976: transition: pdal

2020-09-11 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 9/10/20 3:13 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 9/10/20 9:06 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 09/09/2020 17:53, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>>> X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>>> Control: forwarded -1 
>>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-pdal.html
>>>
>>> PDAL bumped its SONAME requiring a transition.
>>>
>>> All packages except paraview rebuilt successfully as summarized below.
>>>
>>> The paraview FTBFS is unrelated to PDAL.
>>>
>>>
>>> Transition: pdal
>>>
>>>  libpdal-base10 (2.1.0+ds-2+b1) -> libpdal-base12 (2.2.0+ds-1~exp1)
>>>  libpdal-util10 (2.1.0+ds-2+b1) -> libpdal-util12 (2.2.0+ds-1~exp1)
>>>
>>> The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.
>>>
>>>  cloudcompare (2.10.3-4) OK
>>>  grass(7.8.3-1)  OK
>>>  paraview (5.7.0-4)  FTBFS (#957660)
>>
>> Go ahead.
> 
> Thanks! pdal (2.2.0+ds-1) has been uploaded to unstable and is built &
> installed on all release architectures.

Thanks for scheduling the binNMUs, grass has built successfully. It
looks like openmpi 4.0.5 broke things (#970036), preventing cloudcompare
and paraview from being rebuilt.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1



Bug#887085: systemd units are pushed to salsa

2020-09-11 Thread Pirate Praveen




On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 22:15, Pirate Praveen 
 wrote:
We currently use debhelper compat 10 for this (like gitlab), but we 
need to find out how to do it in newer debhelper compat versions.


I think changing dh_installinit to dh_installsystemd in newer compat 
level will do the trick.




Bug#970083: multiple spaces in symbols files

2020-09-11 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: src:dpkg
Version: 1.20.5
Severity: minor

symbols files with more than one space between the symbol name and the minor
version are rejected. This should either be documented in deb-symbols(5), or
accepted in symbols files.

while looking for the documentation, I saw that dpkg-gensymbols(1) refers to
deb-symbols(5) for the format, however comments in symbols files are only
documented in dpkg-gensymbols(1).



Bug#887085: support libjemalloc usage for better memory usage

2020-09-11 Thread Pirate Praveen




On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 14:04, Pirate Praveen 
 wrote:
Include this change in systemd units too 
https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/pull/7919


I think setting LD_PRELOAD in diaspora.conf to
/usr/lib/$(dpkg-architecture -q DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)/libjemalloc.so.2 
should be enough (but we should evalauate this in postinst and set the 
value)




Bug#970063: debian-paketmanagement-buch: bullseye: /updates -> -security

2020-09-11 Thread Axel Beckert
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
Control: severity -1 + important

Hi Paul,

Paul Wise wrote:
> In the section "Inhalt der automatisch generierten Liste der
> Paketmirrors" there is a reference to stable/updates but with the
> release of Debian bullseye this reference will be broken since Debian
> has switched to using bullseye-security for bullseye.

Thanks for the reminder!

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE



Bug#887085: support libjemalloc usage for better memory usage

2020-09-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
Include this change in systemd units too 
https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/pull/7919




Bug#495023:

2020-09-11 Thread jibeh dudu
Hallo guten Morgen, ich habe dir vor ein paar Tagen eine E-Mail geschickt,
aber keine Antwort, bitte antworte dringend


Bug#970082: ITP: r-bioc-monocle -- Clustering, differential expression, and trajectory analysis for

2020-09-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

Subject: ITP: r-bioc-monocle -- Clustering, differential expression, and 
trajectory analysis for
Package: wnpp
Owner: Andreas Tille 
Severity: wishlist

* Package name: r-bioc-monocle
  Version : 2.16.0
  Upstream Author : Copyright: (FIXME: year)-2020 Cole Trapnell
* URL : https://bioconductor.org/packages/monocle/
* License : Artistic-2.0
  Programming Lang: GNU R
  Description : Clustering, differential expression, and trajectory 
analysis for
   single- cell RNA-Seq
 Monocle performs differential expression and time-series analysis
 for single-cell expression experiments. It orders individual cells
 according to progress through a biological process, without knowing ahead
 of time which genes define progress through that process. Monocle also
 performs differential expression analysis, clustering, visualization, and
 other useful tasks on single cell expression data.  It is designed to work
 with RNA-Seq and qPCR data, but could be used with other types as well.

Remark: This package is maintained by Debian R Packages Maintainers at
   https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-monocle



  1   2   >