Bug#1037304: Addendum

2023-06-17 Thread Brett Gilio
Hey there comrades,

I would like to add that I can also replicate this same bug on a fresh
install of Debian 12. However, when I upgrade to attempt to use Xorg rather
than Wayland compositing the issue is bypassed. Likewise if I upgrade to
unstable packages. Might this lead to the issue not being gnome-keyring?

Brett


Bug#975655: RFS: smlnj -- Standard ML of New Jersey interactive compiler [QA upload]

2020-11-24 Thread Brett Gilio
Fabian Wolff  writes:

> I have now packaged the latest upstream version,
> 110.98.1, which, most notably, contains actual support for amd64:
> Until now, the smlnj package on amd64 shipped 32-bit binaries; see
> #796661.
>

YAY!

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
GNU Project webmaster [https://gnu.org/help/]
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87



Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-17 Thread Brett Gilio
Sebastian Ramacher  writes:

>
> Except for sks, they were fixed by rerunning them with the correct
> binNMUs. sks, however, looks like a real issue introduced by the switch
> to 4.11.1
>

I checked buildd for this transition on SKS and it seems to be completed
successfully?
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=sks=armhf=1.1.6%2Bgit20200620.9e9d504-1%2Bb1=1602666464=0

I am not understanding something here, surely.

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87



Bug#972326: thunderbird extensions no longer work

2020-10-17 Thread Brett Gilio
Carsten Schoenert  writes:

> There isn't something that the Thunderbird package needs to wait on.
> There are the control fields Depends and Breaks that declare the
> relation of packages. If the user is installing Add-ons then he is doing
> this on his own and needs to in specific case talk to upstream if
> something isn't working well.
>

Our own guidelines says to report a bug here, and let us escalate the
issue to upstream if necessary. As far as I see it, they followed the
correct procedure.

I'm sure you can come up with a more friendly way to say what you mean.

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87



Bug#972326: thunderbird extensions no longer work

2020-10-17 Thread Brett Gilio
Carsten Schoenert  writes:


>
> This all isn't a Debian specific issue, it is also happen with the
> upstream packages of Thunderbird.

I read your message again. I am in agreement with you, the extensions
are not in our control. Apologies.

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87



Bug#937184: Python 3 port of offlineimap underway

2020-10-16 Thread Brett Gilio
Sudip Mukherjee  writes:
>
> upstream is asking to treat offlineimap and offlineimap3 as separate
> package. https://github.com/OfflineIMAP/offlineimap3/issues/10

I think we should preserve offlineimap until offlineimap3 is released,
and then we can probably rename offlineimap3 once offlineimap is
considered unsupported by the maintainers.

Thoughts?

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87



Bug#896458: RFH: SWI-Prolog in Debian

2020-10-16 Thread Brett Gilio
Lev Lamberov  writes:

> Hi Brett,
>
>> Hello all. If there is still interest in needing co-maintenance on this
>> package, I would be willing to help.
>
> yes, there is still an interest in help with swi-prolog in Debian.
>
> What do you plan to do? If you're not quite sure for now, you can start
> by triaging bugs reported to Debian BTS. But honestly, there are not so
> much of them.
>
> Cheers!
> Lev

Hi Lev,

I was hoping to help keep it upto date, and triage any bugs against it.
Additionally, I was able to get SWIPL to build reproducibly when I
packaged it for GNU Guix (where I also maintain SWIPL), and was wanting
to be able to do the same for Debian.


-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87



Bug#972335: i3lock: Cannot read image from pipe

2020-10-16 Thread Brett Gilio
Cédric Hannotier  writes:

> Package: i3lock
> Version: 2.11.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Reading image from stdin throws OOM.
> It has been reported in [1].
> It is solved using option --raw introduced in [2].
> It is included in last release [3].
>
> Could you please upgrade i3lock to v2.12?
> It was release more than 1 year ago.
>

It looks as though this package needs to be marked as orphaned. Would you report
it as such to WNPP?

https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87



Bug#972326: thunderbird extensions no longer work

2020-10-16 Thread Brett Gilio
Alain Knaff  writes:
> Extensions no longer work since recent update.
>
> Examples: QuickFolders, Toggle Word Wrap, DOM Instepctor Plus!, Dorando
> keyconfig, ...
>
> Please only push new thunderbird versions once it is clear that they work.

Could you specify what the behavior is? Something like toggling word
wrap doesn't appear to be an extension, but is a built in behavior. If
this is the case, then perhaps our build of Thunderbird is improper.

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87



Bug#972323: libllvm11 and libllvm11:i386 aren't coinstallable

2020-10-16 Thread Brett Gilio
Shmerl  writes:

> they have a version mismatch:
>
> libllvm11:amd64 - 1:11.0.0-2
> libllvm11:i386 - 1:11.0.0-2+b1
>
> That makes it impossible to install latest Mesa with both 64 and 32-bit.

Is it possible to just remove the binNMU? I'm not sure.

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87



Bug#971415: transition: ocaml

2020-10-16 Thread Brett Gilio
Sebastian Ramacher  writes:

> autopkgtest for cudf/0.9-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression ♻ 
> (reference ♻), i386: Pass
> autopkgtest for dose3/5.0.1-15: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Test in 
> progress, i386: Pass
> autopkgtest for mcl/1:14-137+ds-9: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: 
> Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass
> autopkgtest for morbig/0.10.4-4: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression 
> ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Not a regression
> autopkgtest for morsmall/0.3.0-3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Regression 
> ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass
> autopkgtest for ocaml-visitors/20200210-2: armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻)
> autopkgtest for ppx-deriving-yojson/3.5.3-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: 
> Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass
> autopkgtest for sks/1.1.6+git20200620.9e9d504-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, 
> armhf: Regression ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Pass
> autopkgtest for why3/1.3.3-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Test in 
> progress, i386: Pass
>

Hi, new OCaml team member. Are these regressions introduced on the
4.11.x switch? Thanks!

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87



Bug#896458: RFH: SWI-Prolog in Debian

2020-10-15 Thread Brett Gilio


Hello all. If there is still interest in needing co-maintenance on this
package, I would be willing to help.

-- 
Brett M. Gilio
bre...@gnu.org
https://brettgilio.com/
E82A C026 95D6 FF02 43CA 1E5C F6C5 2DD1 BA27 CB87