Bug#1028375: Accepted xz-utils 5.4.1-0.1 (source) into unstable

2023-02-10 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Sebastian,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:25:08PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior dixit:
> 
> >How is this getting to work without manpages-fr contributing to it?
> 
> By adding a conflict (can’t remember if it has to be Conflicts or Breaks
> will also work) plus Replaces on manpages-fr (<< 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1) on
> xz-utils in bookworm. (And the others similarily.)

And please remember to make the same for manpages-de (sorry, if that
was obvious).

Thanks!

Greetings

Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1028375: Accepted xz-utils 5.4.1-0.1 (source) into unstable

2023-02-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior dixit:

>How is this getting to work without manpages-fr contributing to it?

By adding a conflict (can’t remember if it has to be Conflicts or Breaks
will also work) plus Replaces on manpages-fr (<< 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1) on
xz-utils in bookworm. (And the others similarily.)

Which is, kinda, what I wrote before.

And no, you cannot rely on people upgrading within bpo first,
especially as bpo repository signatures expire YEARS before
the lifetime of the base release.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
 you introduced a merge commit│ % g rebase -i HEAD^^
 sorry, no idea and rebasing just fscked │ Segmentation
 should have cloned into a clean repo  │  fault (core dumped)
 if I rebase that now, it's really ugh │ wuahh



Bug#1028375: Accepted xz-utils 5.4.1-0.1 (source) into unstable

2023-02-10 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2023-02-10 20:22:54 [+], Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior dixit:
> 
> >Good. So unless Thorsten disagrees this is done ;)
> 
> Please also test the upgrade with 4.16.0-1~bpo11+1 installed
> on bullseye instead of 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1 (since that is a valid
> upgrade path), without going via 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1.

I would expect that people upgrade to 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1 before going to
the next stable. This whole procedure follows then case #9 from
https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition

where manpages-fr is A and xz-utils is B.
How is this getting to work without manpages-fr contributing to it?

> bye,
> //mirabilos

Sebastian



Bug#1028375: Accepted xz-utils 5.4.1-0.1 (source) into unstable

2023-02-10 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior dixit:

>Good. So unless Thorsten disagrees this is done ;)

Please also test the upgrade with 4.16.0-1~bpo11+1 installed
on bullseye instead of 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1 (since that is a valid
upgrade path), without going via 4.17.0-2~bpo11+1.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
15:41⎜ Somebody write a testsuite for helloworld :-)



Bug#1028375: Accepted xz-utils 5.4.1-0.1 (source) into unstable

2023-02-10 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2023-02-10 20:43:01 [+0100], Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Sebastian,
Hi Helge,

> From the manpages-l10n side everything is in place, I would then also
> properly close #1028233. (Uploads to bpo do not manipulate the BTS).

Good. So unless Thorsten disagrees this is done ;)

> Greetings
> 
>  Helge

Sebastian



Bug#1028375: Accepted xz-utils 5.4.1-0.1 (source) into unstable

2023-02-10 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Sebastian,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 08:06:38PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2023-02-01 17:59:57 [+], Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > > xz-utils (5.4.1-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> > > .
> > >   * Non-maintainer upload.
> > >   * Update pt_BR translations.
> > >   * Add lintian overrides and an override for blhc.
> > 
> > This is missing the updated Breaks+Replaces for manpages-l10n though.
> 
> That is correct, I wanted to wait until the bpo packages gets accepted
> as discussed with Helge.
> Now with the bpo package accepted I did a test from bullseye -> sid and
> from the log:
> 
> | $ grep -E 'manpages-fr|xz-utils' screenlog.0
> | dpkg -l manpages-fr xz-utils
> | ii  manpages-fr4.17.0-2~bpo11+1  all  French man pages
> | ii  xz-utils   5.2.5-2.1~deb11u1 amd64XZ-format compression 
> utilities
> |   logrotate logsave lsb-base lsb-release lsof mailcap man-db manpages 
> manpages-fr manpages-fr-dev mawk media-types mount nano ncurses-base 
> ncurses-bin ncurses-term netbase
> |   util-linux-locales vim-common vim-tiny wamerican wget whiptail xauth 
> xdg-user-dirs xkb-data xxd xz-utils zlib1g
> | Get:277 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 manpages-fr all 
> 4.17.0-2 [1,926 kB]
> | Get:278 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 xz-utils amd64 
> 5.4.1-0.1 [468 kB]
> | Get:279 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 manpages-fr-dev 
> all 4.17.0-2 [2,489 kB]
> | dpkg: considering removing manpages-fr in favour of xz-utils ...
> | dpkg: yes, will remove manpages-fr in favour of xz-utils
> | Preparing to unpack .../066-xz-utils_5.4.1-0.1_amd64.deb ...
> | Unpacking xz-utils (5.4.1-0.1) over (5.2.5-2.1~deb11u1) ...
> | Removing manpages-fr (4.17.0-2~bpo11+1), to allow configuration of xz-utils 
> (5.4.1-0.1) ...
> | Selecting previously unselected package manpages-fr.
> | Preparing to unpack .../067-manpages-fr_4.17.0-2_all.deb ...
> | Unpacking manpages-fr (4.17.0-2) ...
> | Preparing to unpack .../068-manpages-fr-dev_4.17.0-2_all.deb ...
> | Unpacking manpages-fr-dev (4.17.0-2) over (4.17.0-2~bpo11+1) ...
> | Setting up manpages-fr-dev (4.17.0-2) ...
> | Setting up xz-utils (5.4.1-0.1) ...
> | Setting up manpages-fr (4.17.0-2) ...
> 
> So it works as intended. Therefore I would close this bug report.
> Any disagreement?

From the manpages-l10n side everything is in place, I would then also
properly close #1028233. (Uploads to bpo do not manipulate the BTS).

Greetings

 Helge

-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#1028375: Accepted xz-utils 5.4.1-0.1 (source) into unstable

2023-02-10 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2023-02-01 17:59:57 [+], Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > xz-utils (5.4.1-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >   * Non-maintainer upload.
> >   * Update pt_BR translations.
> >   * Add lintian overrides and an override for blhc.
> 
> This is missing the updated Breaks+Replaces for manpages-l10n though.

That is correct, I wanted to wait until the bpo packages gets accepted
as discussed with Helge.
Now with the bpo package accepted I did a test from bullseye -> sid and
from the log:

| $ grep -E 'manpages-fr|xz-utils' screenlog.0
| dpkg -l manpages-fr xz-utils
| ii  manpages-fr4.17.0-2~bpo11+1  all  French man pages
| ii  xz-utils   5.2.5-2.1~deb11u1 amd64XZ-format compression 
utilities
|   logrotate logsave lsb-base lsb-release lsof mailcap man-db manpages 
manpages-fr manpages-fr-dev mawk media-types mount nano ncurses-base 
ncurses-bin ncurses-term netbase
|   util-linux-locales vim-common vim-tiny wamerican wget whiptail xauth 
xdg-user-dirs xkb-data xxd xz-utils zlib1g
| Get:277 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 manpages-fr all 
4.17.0-2 [1,926 kB]
| Get:278 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 xz-utils amd64 
5.4.1-0.1 [468 kB]
| Get:279 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian sid/main amd64 manpages-fr-dev all 
4.17.0-2 [2,489 kB]
| dpkg: considering removing manpages-fr in favour of xz-utils ...
| dpkg: yes, will remove manpages-fr in favour of xz-utils
| Preparing to unpack .../066-xz-utils_5.4.1-0.1_amd64.deb ...
| Unpacking xz-utils (5.4.1-0.1) over (5.2.5-2.1~deb11u1) ...
| Removing manpages-fr (4.17.0-2~bpo11+1), to allow configuration of xz-utils 
(5.4.1-0.1) ...
| Selecting previously unselected package manpages-fr.
| Preparing to unpack .../067-manpages-fr_4.17.0-2_all.deb ...
| Unpacking manpages-fr (4.17.0-2) ...
| Preparing to unpack .../068-manpages-fr-dev_4.17.0-2_all.deb ...
| Unpacking manpages-fr-dev (4.17.0-2) over (4.17.0-2~bpo11+1) ...
| Setting up manpages-fr-dev (4.17.0-2) ...
| Setting up xz-utils (5.4.1-0.1) ...
| Setting up manpages-fr (4.17.0-2) ...

So it works as intended. Therefore I would close this bug report.
Any disagreement?

> bye,
> //mirabilos

Sebastian



Bug#1028375: Accepted xz-utils 5.4.1-0.1 (source) into unstable

2023-02-01 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Debian FTP Masters dixit:

>Changed-By: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 
>Changes:
> xz-utils (5.4.1-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>   * Non-maintainer upload.
>   * Update pt_BR translations.
>   * Add lintian overrides and an override for blhc.

This is missing the updated Breaks+Replaces for manpages-l10n though.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
22:20⎜ The crazy that persists in his craziness becomes a master
22:21⎜ And the distance between the craziness and geniality is
only measured by the success 18:35⎜ "Psychotics are consistently
inconsistent. The essence of sanity is to be inconsistently inconsistent