Bug#1022854: Bug#1030751: debuerreotype: diff for NMU version 0.15-1.1
On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 00:06, Adrian Bunk wrote: > The urgency is the freeze deadline, I am currently going through > packages that would miss bookworm if they aren't fixed. Thank you for explaining! I don't love disabling the test just for transition, but I suppose it's reasonable. I've re-uploaded the NMU changes for now (and committed them to Git). ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4
Bug#1022854: Bug#1030751: debuerreotype: diff for NMU version 0.15-1.1
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 09:15:42AM -0800, Tianon Gravi wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 01:33, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Package: debuerreotype > > Version: 0.15-1 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: patch pending > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I've prepared an NMU for debuerreotype (versioned as 0.15-1.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should > > cancel it. > > > > cu > > Adrian > > I'm sorry, but I must admit to being a little bit confused by this -- > why was this a whole new bug instead of just a comment on #1022854? That was my fault when submitting it, I was not closing the bug (since it is only workarounded) so "nmudiff" created a new bug. > (and why wasn't there any attempt to communicate about why it's urgent > for you before the NMU, especially with such a short delay? is there > a particular reason you're doing this? I can guess at your > motivations, but it sure helps if they're written somewhere ) The urgency is the freeze deadline, I am currently going through packages that would miss bookworm if they aren't fixed. cu Adrian
Bug#1030751: debuerreotype: diff for NMU version 0.15-1.1
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 09:15, Tianon Gravi wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 01:33, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Package: debuerreotype > > Version: 0.15-1 > > Severity: normal > > Tags: patch pending > > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I've prepared an NMU for debuerreotype (versioned as 0.15-1.1) and > > uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should > > cancel it. > > > > cu > > Adrian > > I'm sorry, but I must admit to being a little bit confused by this -- > why was this a whole new bug instead of just a comment on #1022854? > > (and why wasn't there any attempt to communicate about why it's urgent > for you before the NMU, especially with such a short delay? is there > a particular reason you're doing this? I can guess at your > motivations, but it sure helps if they're written somewhere ) Given the timezone differences, I've dcut cancel'd the upload for now (assuming that gets picked up correctly and I didn't mess something up). I'm not opposed to the change (or even it being an NMU), but doing so without a discussion doesn't seem right and I'd like to understand what the end goal is better and why it's urgent enough for you to upload with a DELAYED/1 NMU. Thanks! ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4
Bug#1022854: Bug#1030751: debuerreotype: diff for NMU version 0.15-1.1
On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 01:33, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: debuerreotype > Version: 0.15-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch pending > > Dear maintainer, > > I've prepared an NMU for debuerreotype (versioned as 0.15-1.1) and > uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should > cancel it. > > cu > Adrian I'm sorry, but I must admit to being a little bit confused by this -- why was this a whole new bug instead of just a comment on #1022854? (and why wasn't there any attempt to communicate about why it's urgent for you before the NMU, especially with such a short delay? is there a particular reason you're doing this? I can guess at your motivations, but it sure helps if they're written somewhere ) ♥, - Tianon 4096R / B42F 6819 007F 00F8 8E36 4FD4 036A 9C25 BF35 7DD4
Bug#1030751: debuerreotype: diff for NMU version 0.15-1.1
Package: debuerreotype Version: 0.15-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for debuerreotype (versioned as 0.15-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/1. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it. cu Adrian diff -Nru debuerreotype-0.15/debian/changelog debuerreotype-0.15/debian/changelog --- debuerreotype-0.15/debian/changelog 2022-08-24 00:27:02.0 +0300 +++ debuerreotype-0.15/debian/changelog 2023-02-07 11:26:21.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +debuerreotype (0.15-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Disable the autopkgtest. (see #1022854) + + -- Adrian Bunk Tue, 07 Feb 2023 11:26:21 +0200 + debuerreotype (0.15-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Update to 0.15 upstream release diff -Nru debuerreotype-0.15/debian/tests/control debuerreotype-0.15/debian/tests/control --- debuerreotype-0.15/debian/tests/control 2021-03-27 00:47:05.0 +0200 +++ debuerreotype-0.15/debian/tests/control 2023-02-07 11:26:21.0 +0200 @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ -Tests: stretch -Depends: ca-certificates, - debian-archive-keyring, - debootstrap, - debuerreotype, - diffoscope, - gnupg, - wget, - xz-utils -Restrictions: allow-stderr, needs-root +#Tests: stretch +#Depends: ca-certificates, +# debian-archive-keyring, +# debootstrap, +# debuerreotype, +# diffoscope, +# gnupg, +# wget, +# xz-utils +#Restrictions: allow-stderr, needs-root
