Bug#291673: libxine1: Release 1 uses more CPU than previous RC versions
Package: libxine1 Version: 1.0-1 Severity: minor It seems to me that the 1.0 version of xine uses significantly more cpu than any of the release candidates. Something like 10-30% more. I used to be able to run xine over ssh on my server and watch the goom output locally, but I can't with version 1.0 because it takes too much cpu, the video studders. Kind Regards Anders E. Andersen -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages libxine1 depends on: ii libasound2 1.0.7-4 ALSA library ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.3 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libmodplug0 1:0.7-3 ModPlug mod-like music shared libr ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libspeex11.0.rel.4-1 The Speex Speech Codec ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#291673: libxine1: Release 1 uses more CPU than previous RC versions
tags 291673 unreproducible thanks. On Sat, 22 Jan 2005, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote: It seems to me that the 1.0 version of xine uses significantly more cpu than any of the release candidates. Something like 10-30% more. I used to be able to run xine over ssh on my server and watch the goom output locally, but I can't with version 1.0 because it takes too much cpu, the video studders. Sorry, I'm unable to reproduce this. 1.0-1 performs exactly as well as the RC series here. Have you possibly increased the resolution for goom? One question about your setup: You're not really running xine on your server with the goom output tunnelled through ssh's X11 forward to your workstation, are you?
Bug#291673: libxine1: Release 1 uses more CPU than previous RC versions
On Saturday 22 January 2005 16:34, Siggi Langauf wrote: It seems to me that the 1.0 version of xine uses significantly more cpu than any of the release candidates. Something like 10-30% more. I used Sorry, I'm unable to reproduce this. 1.0-1 performs exactly as well as the RC series here. Have you possibly increased the resolution for goom? No, I haven't touched it. Also DVDs and mpeg4 streams use more cpu as well. I almost can't play DVDs on my laptop anymore because it uses almost 100% cpu to play. It used to be well beneath 80% or so. One question about your setup: You're not really running xine on your server with the goom output tunnelled through ssh's X11 forward to your workstation, are you? Not normally. I usually just play it directly on my laptop, or on the server. My server is connected to my stereo, so sometimes i log in via ssh and start up kaffeine there. I get the audio on my stereo and the video on the forwarded x11 window with kaffeine. My servers only display is my tv set. It should be said that I asked some people in the debian-user-danish list about this as well, but so far, among the few people that answered, noone could reproduce this. Still they recommended I filed a bug report as a severity minor, so it could be investigated. Anders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
