Bug#388879: closed by Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#388879: fixed in cpufreqd 2.2.0-1)
* set debconf priority to error as we're only displaying errors. (Closes: #388879) s/priority/type I suggest also double-checking that the *priority* is adapted. Displaying errors at priority low or medium makes them very likely to *not* be displayed so you might really consider whether the priority is adaptedor if the note itself is really useful, of course...:-) If these error notes are really something that your users should see when the error occurs, setting their priority to high is probably better. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#388879: closed by Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#388879: fixed in cpufreqd 2.2.0-1)
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 08:03:32AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: * set debconf priority to error as we're only displaying errors. (Closes: #388879) s/priority/type doh. :) I suggest also double-checking that the *priority* is double doh! will do. adapted. Displaying errors at priority low or medium makes them very likely to *not* be displayed so you might really consider whether the priority is adaptedor if the note itself is really useful, of course...:-) If these error notes are really something that your users should see when the error occurs, setting their priority to high is probably better. Well, I don't think the message itself is all that useful, that is why it was a note of low priority. What I'm concerned about is all the wasted translation effort if the notes are completely removed... I'm seriously thinking about completely removing them now... -- mattia :wq! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#388879: closed by Mattia Dongili [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bug#388879: fixed in cpufreqd 2.2.0-1)
I suggest also double-checking that the *priority* is double doh! will do. adapted. Displaying errors at priority low or medium makes them very likely to *not* be displayed so you might really consider whether the priority is adaptedor if the note itself is really useful, of course...:-) If these error notes are really something that your users should see when the error occurs, setting their priority to high is probably better. Well, I don't think the message itself is all that useful, that is why it was a note of low priority. What I'm concerned about is all the wasted translation effort if the notes are completely removed... I'm seriously thinking about completely removing them now... Actually, I read some writings by Joey Hess stating that error templates are displayed *whatever* the debconf priority settings could be..:-) So, indeed, what I previously mentioned might be wrong. About wasted translation effort, well, there will be some...but just think about the effort you would save, avoiding future translators to work on the template..:) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
