Hi Amaya,
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:04:52PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
A new upstream release of subtitleeditor is out [1]. Please consider
packaging it. Thanks.
Yes, I have already done so, but:
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:33:28 -0800
From: Debian Installer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Amaya Rodrigo Sastre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: subtitleeditor_0.11-3_i386.changes REJECTED
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 29 20:39:34 2006
Rejected: subtitleeditor_0.11-3_i386.deb: old version
(0.11-alpha2-2) in unstable = new version (0.11-3)
targeted at unstable.
Rejected: subtitleeditor_0.11-3.dsc: old version
(0.11-alpha2-2) in unstable = new version (0.11-3)
targeted at unstable.
The package is available for download from:
http://www.amayita.com/debian/subtitleeditor/old/subtitleeditor_0.11-3_i386.deb
I will try to solve this and upload soon.
Indeed, quite normal behaviour from dak which believes that the Debian
version is -alpha2-2.
Surely, the last thing to do would be to use an epoch. A good option is
to use a new upstream release suffix, such as 0.11a, like I did when
I modified the upstream tarball of yaboot which contained already
built binary objects. However, here if you look at what I wrote,
you see that the upstream release is 0.11.1, so there you have a new
upstream tarball and release which will superseed 0.11-whatever. ;)
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'` Free Software Developer
`- Unix Sys Net Admin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
