Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
I have had the same problem with a bigmem 2.6.30 kernel on Debian Squeeze I solved installing the backport made by Bertrand and with the downgrade of libdrm2 from 2.4.12-1 to 2.3.1-2 -- Dott. Mauro Michelotti -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Bertrand Marc wrote: Hi, I don't know if you still have no hardware acceleration, but it seems that downgrading libdrm to 2.3.1 (in Lenny, see http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libdrm2) could give you hardware acceleration with Xserver 1.4 and Linux 2.6.30. Bertrand Thanks Bertrand! It worked. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: Info received (Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64))
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course. Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s): Fglrx packaging team If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please send it to 542...@bugs.debian.org. Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system. Further to my earlier report, Bertrand Marc tracked the problem down to the libdrm2 package. Reverting the version in Lenny fixed the problem. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Bertrand Marc wrote: Hi, I don't know if you still have no hardware acceleration, but it seems that downgrading libdrm to 2.3.1 (in Lenny, see http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libdrm2) could give you hardware acceleration with Xserver 1.4 and Linux 2.6.30. Bertrand Thanks for the tip. I'll give it a try later this evening. I've got a RAID array re-syncing right now and I don't want to interrupt it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Hi, I don't know if you still have no hardware acceleration, but it seems that downgrading libdrm to 2.3.1 (in Lenny, see http://packages.debian.org/lenny/libdrm2) could give you hardware acceleration with Xserver 1.4 and Linux 2.6.30. Bertrand
Bug#542140: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Patrick Matthäi wrote: Gary Dale schrieb: Bertrand Marc wrote: Gary Dale a écrit : I notice that the log heading reports the X server version as 1.4.2. That seems a little strange. Right, I didn't notice that. It's probably the issue, but still I can't figure out where it comes from. Also noticed that I've somehow lost ACPI support. I know I used to have it and I don't recall removing it, so I reinstalled it. That should at least allow my screen to power down again. If you installed fglrx with apt-get, you didn't installed 'Recommands', so you probably should install fglrx-atieventsd to get ACPI support. Bertrand PS could you cc your replies to #542140 ? No, it was likely just the lack of the ACPID that caused the problem. The fglrx-atieventsd was one of the .debs that installed OK earlier. Aptitude seems to think I've got the latest version. So maybe we should add acpid to recommends on fglrx-atieventsd. It should be part of any recent Linux install. I don't know how it got removed. However, all that installing it fixed was a problem I had with my screen not shutting off - something that has never been a problem before (other than the ongoing problem with mplayer/avidemux/etc. crashing the screensaver). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Gary Dale schrieb: Bertrand Marc wrote: Gary Dale a écrit : I notice that the log heading reports the X server version as 1.4.2. That seems a little strange. Right, I didn't notice that. It's probably the issue, but still I can't figure out where it comes from. Also noticed that I've somehow lost ACPI support. I know I used to have it and I don't recall removing it, so I reinstalled it. That should at least allow my screen to power down again. If you installed fglrx with apt-get, you didn't installed 'Recommands', so you probably should install fglrx-atieventsd to get ACPI support. Bertrand PS could you cc your replies to #542140 ? No, it was likely just the lack of the ACPID that caused the problem. The fglrx-atieventsd was one of the .debs that installed OK earlier. Aptitude seems to think I've got the latest version. So maybe we should add acpid to recommends on fglrx-atieventsd. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Bertrand Marc wrote: Gary Dale a écrit : I notice that the log heading reports the X server version as 1.4.2. That seems a little strange. Right, I didn't notice that. It's probably the issue, but still I can't figure out where it comes from. Also noticed that I've somehow lost ACPI support. I know I used to have it and I don't recall removing it, so I reinstalled it. That should at least allow my screen to power down again. If you installed fglrx with apt-get, you didn't installed 'Recommands', so you probably should install fglrx-atieventsd to get ACPI support. Bertrand PS could you cc your replies to #542140 ? No, it was likely just the lack of the ACPID that caused the problem. The fglrx-atieventsd was one of the .debs that installed OK earlier. Aptitude seems to think I've got the latest version. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Gary Dale a écrit : I notice that the log heading reports the X server version as 1.4.2. That seems a little strange. Right, I didn't notice that. It's probably the issue, but still I can't figure out where it comes from. Also noticed that I've somehow lost ACPI support. I know I used to have it and I don't recall removing it, so I reinstalled it. That should at least allow my screen to power down again. If you installed fglrx with apt-get, you didn't installed 'Recommands', so you probably should install fglrx-atieventsd to get ACPI support. Bertrand PS could you cc your replies to #542140 ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Gary Dale a écrit : Yes. I followed Patrick's recipe: # apt-get install fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-source module-assistant # m-a a-i fglrx See attached log: Here are the interesting lines of your Xorg.0.log. It means you don't have hardware acceleration : (II) fglrx(0): driver needs X.org 7.1.x.y with x.y >= 0.0 (WW) fglrx(0): could not detect X server version (query_status=-1) (EE) fglrx(0): atiddxDriScreenInit failed, GPS not been initialized. (WW) fglrx(0): *** (WW) fglrx(0): * DRI initialization failed! * (WW) fglrx(0): * (maybe driver kernel module missing or bad) * (WW) fglrx(0): * 2D acceleraton available (MMIO) * (WW) fglrx(0): * no 3D acceleration available* (WW) fglrx(0): * * But honestly I don't know why fglrx couldn't detect your Xorg version... cheers, Bertrand X.Org X Server 1.4.2 Release Date: 11 June 2008 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.4.2-11) Current Operating System: Linux transponder 2.6.30-1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Aug 3 12:28:22 UTC 2009 x86_64 Build Date: 20 February 2009 04:53:05PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sun Aug 23 13:47:50 2009 (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" (==) ServerLayout "Default Layout" (**) |-->Screen "Default Screen" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "DELL P1110" (**) | |-->Device "ATI HD3300" (**) |-->Input Device "Generic Keyboard" (**) |-->Input Device "Configured Mouse" (==) Automatically adding devices (==) Automatically enabling devices (==) Including the default font path /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc,/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic,/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled,/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled,/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1,/usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi,/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi,/var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType. (**) FontPath set to: /usr/local/share/fonts, /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc, /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic, /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled, /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled, /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1, /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi, /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi, /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType (==) RgbPath set to "/etc/X11/rgb" (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib/xorg/modules" (WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory) (II) No APM support in BIOS or kernel (II) Loader magic: 0x7c31c0 (II) Module ABI versions: X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3 X.Org Video Driver: 2.0 X.Org XInput driver : 2.0 X.Org Server Extension : 0.3 X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libpcidata.so (II) Module pcidata: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.4.2, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 2.0 (++) using VT number 7 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1022,9600 card 1022,9600 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1022,9602 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:06:0: chip 1022,9606 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:0a:0: chip 1022,9609 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:11:0: chip 1002,4391 card 1458,b002 rev 00 class 01,06,01 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:12:0: chip 1002,4397 card 1458,5004 rev 00 class 0c,03,10 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:12:1: chip 1002,4398 card 1458,5004 rev 00 class 0c,03,10 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:12:2: chip 1002,4396 card 1458,5004 rev 00 class 0c,03,20 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:13:0: chip 1002,4397 card 1458,5004 rev 00 class 0c,03,10 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:13:1: chip 1002,4398 card 1458,5004 rev 00 class 0c,03,10 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:13:2: chip 1002,4396 card 1458,5004 rev 00 class 0c,03,20 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:14:0: chip 1002,4385 card 1458,4385 rev 3a class 0c,05,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:14:1: chip 1002,439c card 1458,5002 rev 00 class 01,01,8a hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:14:2: chip 1002,4383 card 1458,a102 rev 00 class 04,03,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:14:3: chip 1002,439d card 1002,439d rev 00 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:14:4: chip 1002,4384 card , rev 00 class 06,04,01 hdr 81 (II) PCI: 00:14:5: chip 1002,4399 card 1458,5004 rev 00 class 0c,03,10 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:18:0: chip 1022,1200 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:18:1: chip 1022,1201 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:18:2: chip 1022,1202 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:18:3: chip 1022,1203 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:18:4: chip 1022,1204 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 01:05:0: chip 1002,96
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Gary Dale a écrit : I tried it with both the source and compiled modules with the same results. They installed without problems. However, apart from the higher refresh rate I'm getting with the fglrx driver, there's not a lot of difference between this and the vesa driver. The vesa driver still gives a faster display but with some flickering. This is the same result I got with manually installing the ATI drivers from the AMD web site. Prior to upgrading to the 2.6.30 kernel, I was getting great results from the fglrx driver. Windows would drag smoothly and become semi-transparent. I could use the X video extensions for video output from Kaffeine, vlc & mplayer (but the GL video didn't work). And I was getting a lot of desktop effects, such as virtual desktops sliding from one to another. Any ideas on why the current driver's performance is so pitiful? So we are getting closer ! Did you build the module with module-assistant ? And could you attach /var/log/Xorg.0.log ? Thanks Bertrand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Bertrand Marc wrote: Hi, I think I corrected the issue with the diversions. Could you try again the new version here ? deb http://pkg-fglrx.alioth.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-backports/ deb-src http://pkg-fglrx.alioth.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-backports/ Regards, Bertrand What packages do I need from your repository? I'm getting this error on a package that seems to be needed: E: Failed to fetch http://pkg-fglrx.alioth.debian.org/debian/squeeze-backports/fglrx-kernel-src_9-8-1~bpo60+1_all.deb: Size mismatch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Hi, I think I corrected the issue with the diversions. Could you try again the new version here ? deb http://pkg-fglrx.alioth.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-backports/ deb-src http://pkg-fglrx.alioth.debian.org/debian/ squeeze-backports/ Regards, Bertrand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Bertrand Marc wrote: No sorry, I only have 32bits. But you can easily build amd64 backports with the following : #install the build dependancies sudo aptitude build-dep fglrx-driver #download the source of the backport wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.diff.gz wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.dsc wget http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/fglrx-driver/fglrx-driver_9-8.orig.tar.gz #Extract and build the package dpkg-source -x fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.dsc cd fglrx-driver-9-8/ dpkg-buildpackage -b That should do the trick! Bertrand OK, the build seems to have worked. I'm left with these files: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 139062 2009-08-19 22:23 fglrx-atieventsd_9-8-1+bpo1_amd64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7026142 2009-08-19 22:23 fglrx-control_9-8-1+bpo1_amd64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13784818 2009-08-19 22:23 fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1_amd64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 195036 2009-08-19 22:23 fglrx-glx_9-8-1+bpo1_amd64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7093634 2009-08-19 22:23 fglrx-glx-ia32_9-8-1+bpo1_amd64.deb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1547372 2009-08-19 22:23 fglrx-source_9-8-1+bpo1_amd64.deb I can dpkg -i the atieventsd but none of the others install - most complain "dpkg-divert: cannot open diversions: No such file or directory". Is there something else I need to do to get this to work? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Bertrand Marc wrote: No sorry, I only have 32bits. But you can easily build amd64 backports with the following : #install the build dependancies sudo aptitude build-dep fglrx-driver #download the source of the backport wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.diff.gz wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.dsc wget http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/fglrx-driver/fglrx-driver_9-8.orig.tar.gz #Extract and build the package dpkg-source -x fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.dsc cd fglrx-driver-9-8/ dpkg-buildpackage -b That should do the trick! Bertrand I just went to try the build but the files are no longer on beberking.free.fr. - Nevermind - found your note about moving them to a repository. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Bertrand Marc wrote: No sorry, I only have 32bits. But you can easily build amd64 backports with the following : #install the build dependancies sudo aptitude build-dep fglrx-driver #download the source of the backport wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.diff.gz wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.dsc wget http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/fglrx-driver/fglrx-driver_9-8.orig.tar.gz #Extract and build the package dpkg-source -x fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.dsc cd fglrx-driver-9-8/ dpkg-buildpackage -b That should do the trick! Bertrand I just went to try the build but the files are no longer on beberking.free.fr. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
No sorry, I only have 32bits. But you can easily build amd64 backports with the following : #install the build dependancies sudo aptitude build-dep fglrx-driver #download the source of the backport wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.diff.gz wget http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.dsc wget http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/non-free/f/fglrx-driver/fglrx-driver_9-8.orig.tar.gz #Extract and build the package dpkg-source -x fglrx-driver_9-8-1+bpo1.dsc cd fglrx-driver-9-8/ dpkg-buildpackage -b That should do the trick! Bertrand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#542140: Bug#542140: Bug#542140: Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Bertrand Marc wrote: Hi, I just made a backport for Xorg 7.3. Could you test it ? http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/ Bertrand I'd try but I need amd64 packages. Any chance of you posting them? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#542140: Bug#542140: Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Gary Dale schrieb:
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 1:9-2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which
linux-image-2.6.30 was installed, the fglrx driver stopped working. I
could no longer get into X. Removing and reinstalling the driver
under the kernel didn't help.
Because the open source ATI drivers don't work, I'm left with the
vesa driver as the only method for running X.
I've also tried the installation method at
http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-install-ati-fglrx-driver-in-debian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3543
but it fails during the driver install while trying to overwrite
libglx.so - and no amount of trying has let me get around the error.
Even if libglx.so is removed, I still can't overwrite it!
??
We are _not_ supporting the debs resulted by the ati installer!
On Debian just do (but be sure to remove everything from your old
installation):
# apt-get install fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-source module-assisstant
# m-a a-i fglrx
And that was it.
You misunderstood. It was the Debian packages I was having the problem
with. If you re-read my e-mail, I only tried the ATI installer because
the Debian packages didn't work.
The process you list fails, It gives the following log:
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules clean
..
make: *** [kdist_image] Error 2
Yes, known.
Give 9-8-1 a try.
Is that the SID package? If so, it wants to replace my xserver. How
stable is the one in SID?
The following packages have unmet dependencies.
fglrx-driver: Depends: xserver-xorg (>= 1:7.4+1) but it is not going to
be installed
Recommends: fglrx-atieventsd but it is not going to be
installed
E: Broken packages
If I try with aptitude, it suggests the following:
The following packages are
BROKEN: xserver-xorg-core
xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xorg-video-ati The following
NEW packages will be installed:
console-setup{a} console-terminus{a} libaudit0{a}
libdrm-intel1{a}libpciaccess0{a}
xserver-common{a} The
following packages will be
REMOVED:
xserver-xorg-video-apm{a}
xserver-xorg-video-ark{a}
xserver-xorg-video-chips{a}
xserver-xorg-video-cirrus{a}
xserver-xorg-video-cyrix{a}
xserver-xorg-video-dummy{a}
xserver-xorg-video-fbdev{a}
xserver-xorg-video-glint{a}
xserver-xorg-video-i128{a}
xserver-xorg-video-intel{a}
xserver-xorg-video-mach64{a}
xserver-xorg-video-mga{a}
xserver-xorg-video-neomagic{a}
xserver-xorg-video-nv{a}
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome{a}
xserver-xorg-video-r128{a}
xserver-xorg-video-radeon{a}
xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd{a}
xserver-xorg-video-rendition{a}
xserver-xorg-video-s3{a}
xserver-xorg-video-s3virge{a}
xserver-xorg-video-savage{a}
xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion{a}
xserver-xorg-video-sis{a} xserver-xorg-video-sisusb{a}
xserver-xorg-video-tdfx{a}
xserver-xorg-video-tga{a}
xserver-xorg-video-trident{a}
xserver-xorg-video-tseng{a}
xserver-xorg-video-v4l{a}
xserver-xorg-video-vesa{a}
xserver-xorg-video-vga{a}
xserver-xorg-video-vmware{a}
xserver-xorg-video-voodoo{a}The following packages
will be upgraded:fglrx-driver
fglrx-glx fglrx-source libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx
xserver-xorg
7 packages upgraded, 6 newly installed, 34 to remove and 500 not
upgraded. Need to get 33.1MB of archives. After unpacking 5370kB
will be freed. The following packages have unmet
dependencies: xserver-xorg-video-all:
Depends: xserver-xorg-video-apm but it is not
installable
Depends: xserver-xorg-video-ark but it is not
installable
Depends: xserver-xorg-video-chips but it is not
installable
Depends: xserver-xorg-video-cirrus but it is
not
installable
Bug#542140: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#542140: Bug#542140: Bug#542140: Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Hi, I just made a backport for Xorg 7.3. Could you test it ? http://beberking.free.fr/fglrx/ Bertrand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#542140: Bug#542140: Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale schrieb:
> Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Gary Dale schrieb:
>>
>>> Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>>
Gary Dale schrieb:
> Package: fglrx-driver
> Version: 1:9-2-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which
> linux-image-2.6.30 was installed, the fglrx driver stopped working. I
> could no longer get into X. Removing and reinstalling the driver
> under the kernel didn't help.
>
> Because the open source ATI drivers don't work, I'm left with the
> vesa driver as the only method for running X.
>
> I've also tried the installation method at
> http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-install-ati-fglrx-driver-in-debian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3543
>
>
> but it fails during the driver install while trying to overwrite
> libglx.so - and no amount of trying has let me get around the error.
> Even if libglx.so is removed, I still can't overwrite it!
>
??
We are _not_ supporting the debs resulted by the ati installer!
On Debian just do (but be sure to remove everything from your old
installation):
# apt-get install fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-source module-assisstant
# m-a a-i fglrx
And that was it.
>>> You misunderstood. It was the Debian packages I was having the problem
>>> with. If you re-read my e-mail, I only tried the ATI installer because
>>> the Debian packages didn't work.
>>>
>>> The process you list fails, It gives the following log:
>>>
>>> /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules clean
>>>
>..
>>> make: *** [kdist_image] Error 2
>>>
>>
>> Yes, known.
>>
>> Give 9-8-1 a try.
>>
>>
> Is that the SID package? If so, it wants to replace my xserver. How
> stable is the one in SID?
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies.
> fglrx-driver: Depends: xserver-xorg (>= 1:7.4+1) but it is not going to
> be installed
>Recommends: fglrx-atieventsd but it is not going to be
> installed
> E: Broken packages
>
>
> If I try with aptitude, it suggests the following:
>
> The following packages are
> BROKEN: xserver-xorg-core
> xserver-xorg-video-all xserver-xorg-video-ati The following
> NEW packages will be installed:
> console-setup{a} console-terminus{a} libaudit0{a}
> libdrm-intel1{a}libpciaccess0{a}
> xserver-common{a} The
> following packages will be
> REMOVED:
> xserver-xorg-video-apm{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-ark{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-chips{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-cirrus{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-cyrix{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-dummy{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-fbdev{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-glint{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-i128{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-intel{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-mach64{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-mga{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-neomagic{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-nv{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-openchrome{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-r128{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-radeon{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-rendition{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-s3{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-s3virge{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-savage{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-sis{a} xserver-xorg-video-sisusb{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-tdfx{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-tga{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-trident{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-tseng{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-v4l{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-vesa{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-vga{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-vmware{a}
> xserver-xorg-video-voodoo{a}The following packages
> will be upgraded:fglrx-driver
> fglrx-glx fglrx-source libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx
> xserver-xorg
>
> 7 packages upgraded, 6 newly installed, 34 to remove and 500 not
> upgraded. Need to get 33.1MB of archives. After unpacking 5370kB
> will be freed. The following packages have unmet
> dependencies: xserver-xorg-video-all:
> Depends: xserver-xorg-video-apm but it is not
> installable
>
>
> Depends: xserver-xorg-video-ark but it is not
> installable
>
Bug#542140: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#542140: Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gary Dale schrieb:
Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Gary Dale schrieb:
Package: fglrx-driver
Version: 1:9-2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which
linux-image-2.6.30 was installed, the fglrx driver stopped working. I
could no longer get into X. Removing and reinstalling the driver
under the kernel didn't help.
Because the open source ATI drivers don't work, I'm left with the
vesa driver as the only method for running X.
I've also tried the installation method at
http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-install-ati-fglrx-driver-in-debian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3543
but it fails during the driver install while trying to overwrite
libglx.so - and no amount of trying has let me get around the error.
Even if libglx.so is removed, I still can't overwrite it!
??
We are _not_ supporting the debs resulted by the ati installer!
On Debian just do (but be sure to remove everything from your old
installation):
# apt-get install fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-source module-assisstant
# m-a a-i fglrx
And that was it.
You misunderstood. It was the Debian packages I was having the problem
with. If you re-read my e-mail, I only tried the ATI installer because
the Debian packages didn't work.
The process you list fails, It gives the following log:
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules clean
..
make: *** [kdist_image] Error 2
Yes, known.
Give 9-8-1 a try.
Is that the SID package? If so, it wants to replace my xserver. How
stable is the one in SID?
The following packages have unmet dependencies.
fglrx-driver: Depends: xserver-xorg (>= 1:7.4+1) but it is not going
to be installed
Recommends: fglrx-atieventsd but it is not going to be
installed
E: Broken packages
If I try with aptitude, it suggests the following:
The following packages are
BROKEN:
xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-video-all
xserver-xorg-video-ati
The following NEW packages will be
installed:
console-setup{a} console-terminus{a} libaudit0{a}
libdrm-intel1{a}
libpciaccess0{a}
xserver-common{a}
The following packages will be
REMOVED:
xserver-xorg-video-apm{a}
xserver-xorg-video-ark{a}
xserver-xorg-video-chips{a}
xserver-xorg-video-cirrus{a}
xserver-xorg-video-cyrix{a}
xserver-xorg-video-dummy{a}
xserver-xorg-video-fbdev{a}
xserver-xorg-video-glint{a}
xserver-xorg-video-i128{a}
xserver-xorg-video-intel{a}
xserver-xorg-video-mach64{a}
xserver-xorg-video-mga{a}
xserver-xorg-video-neomagic{a}
xserver-xorg-video-nv{a}
xserver-xorg-video-openchrome{a}
xserver-xorg-video-r128{a}
xserver-xorg-video-radeon{a}
xserver-xorg-video-radeonhd{a}
xserver-xorg-video-rendition{a}
xserver-xorg-video-s3{a}
xserver-xorg-video-s3virge{a}
xserver-xorg-video-savage{a}
xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion{a}
xserver-xorg-video-sis{a}
xserver-xorg-video-sisusb{a}
xserver-xorg-video-tdfx{a}
xserver-xorg-video-tga{a}
xserver-xorg-video-trident{a}
xserver-xorg-video-tseng{a}
xserver-xorg-video-v4l{a}
xserver-xorg-video-vesa{a}
xserver-xorg-video-vga{a}
xserver-xorg-video-vmware{a}
xserver-xorg-video-voodoo{a}
The following packages will be
upgraded:
fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-source libgl1-mesa-dri
libgl1-mesa-glx
xserver-xorg
7 packages upgraded, 6 newly installed, 34 to remove and 500 not
upgraded.
Need to get 33.1MB of archives. After unpacking 5370kB will be
freed.
The following packages have unmet
dependencies:
xserver-xorg-video-all: Depends: xserver-xorg-video-apm but it is not
installable
Depends: xserver-xorg-video-ark but it is not
installable
Depends: xserver-xorg-video-chips but it is
not
installable
Depends: xserver-xorg-video-cirrus but it is
not
installable
Depends: xserver-xorg-video-cyrix but it is
n
Bug#542140: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#542140: Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary Dale schrieb: > Patrick Matthäi wrote: >> Gary Dale schrieb: >>> Package: fglrx-driver >>> Version: 1:9-2-2 >>> Severity: grave >>> Justification: renders package unusable >>> >>> After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which >>> linux-image-2.6.30 was installed, the fglrx driver stopped working. I >>> could no longer get into X. Removing and reinstalling the driver >>> under the kernel didn't help. >>> >>> Because the open source ATI drivers don't work, I'm left with the >>> vesa driver as the only method for running X. >>> >>> I've also tried the installation method at >>> http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-install-ati-fglrx-driver-in-debian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3543 >>> >>> but it fails during the driver install while trying to overwrite >>> libglx.so - and no amount of trying has let me get around the error. >>> Even if libglx.so is removed, I still can't overwrite it! >> >> ?? >> >> We are _not_ supporting the debs resulted by the ati installer! >> >> On Debian just do (but be sure to remove everything from your old >> installation): >> >> # apt-get install fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-source module-assisstant >> # m-a a-i fglrx >> >> And that was it. >> > You misunderstood. It was the Debian packages I was having the problem > with. If you re-read my e-mail, I only tried the ATI installer because > the Debian packages didn't work. > > The process you list fails, It gives the following log: > > /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules clean > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' > dh_testroot > rm -f configure-stamp > rm -f fglrx.ko fglrx.mod.c *.o libfglrx_ip.a > rm -f .version .*.o.flags .*.o.d .*.o.cmd .*.ko.cmd > rm -rf .tmp_versions > rm -rf patch > dh_clean > rm -f /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control > rm -f /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/dirs > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' > /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules binary_modules > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' > if [ -f /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control.template ]; then \ >cat /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control.template > > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control; \ >fi > dh_testdir > touch configure-stamp > dh_testdir > /usr/bin/make -C /lib/modules/2.6.30-1-amd64/build > SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/fglrx modules > make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.30-1-amd64' > CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.o > In file included from /usr/src/modules/fglrx/drmP.h:86, > from /usr/src/modules/fglrx/drm_proc.h:41, > from /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:433: > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/drm_os_linux.h:45: error: conflicting types for > ‘irqreturn_t’ > /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.30-1-common/include/linux/irqreturn.h:16: > error: previous declaration of ‘irqreturn_t’ was here > In file included from /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:433: > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/drm_proc.h: In function ‘FGLDRM__vma_info’: > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/drm_proc.h:497: warning: format ‘%08lx’ expects > type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘phys_addr_t’ > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function ‘KCL_GetEffectiveUid’: > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:1407: error: ‘struct task_struct’ > has no member named ‘euid’ > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function > ‘KCL_PosixSecurityCapSetIPCLock’: > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:1781: error: ‘struct task_struct’ > has no member named ‘cap_effective’ > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:1785: error: ‘struct task_struct’ > has no member named ‘cap_effective’ > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function > ‘KCL_InstallInterruptHandler’: > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:2663: warning: passing argument 2 > of ‘request_irq’ from incompatible pointer type > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function > ‘KCL_MEM_VM_GetRegionPhysAddrStr’: > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3225: warning: return makes > pointer from integer without a cast > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3226: warning: return makes > pointer from integer without a cast > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3227: warning: return makes > pointer from integer without a cast > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3229: warning: return makes > pointer from integer without a cast > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function ‘KAS_Ih_Execute’: > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:4204: warning: ‘return’ with no > value, in function returning non-void > make[5]: *** [/usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.o] Error 1 > make[4]: *** [_module_/usr/src/modules/fglrx] Error 2 > make[3]: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.30-1-amd64' > make[1]: *** [build] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' > make: *** [kdist_image] Error 2 Yes, known. Give 9-8-1 a try. - -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kin
Bug#542140: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Patrick Matthäi wrote: Gary Dale schrieb: Package: fglrx-driver Version: 1:9-2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which linux-image-2.6.30 was installed, the fglrx driver stopped working. I could no longer get into X. Removing and reinstalling the driver under the kernel didn't help. Because the open source ATI drivers don't work, I'm left with the vesa driver as the only method for running X. I've also tried the installation method at http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-install-ati-fglrx-driver-in-debian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3543 but it fails during the driver install while trying to overwrite libglx.so - and no amount of trying has let me get around the error. Even if libglx.so is removed, I still can't overwrite it! ?? We are _not_ supporting the debs resulted by the ati installer! On Debian just do (but be sure to remove everything from your old installation): # apt-get install fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-source module-assisstant # m-a a-i fglrx And that was it. You misunderstood. It was the Debian packages I was having the problem with. If you re-read my e-mail, I only tried the ATI installer because the Debian packages didn't work. The process you list fails, It gives the following log: /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules clean make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' dh_testroot rm -f configure-stamp rm -f fglrx.ko fglrx.mod.c *.o libfglrx_ip.a rm -f .version .*.o.flags .*.o.d .*.o.cmd .*.ko.cmd rm -rf .tmp_versions rm -rf patch dh_clean rm -f /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control rm -f /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/dirs make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' /usr/bin/make -f debian/rules binary_modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' if [ -f /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control.template ]; then \ cat /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control.template > /usr/src/modules/fglrx/debian/control; \ fi dh_testdir touch configure-stamp dh_testdir /usr/bin/make -C /lib/modules/2.6.30-1-amd64/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/fglrx modules make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.30-1-amd64' CC [M] /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.o In file included from /usr/src/modules/fglrx/drmP.h:86, from /usr/src/modules/fglrx/drm_proc.h:41, from /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:433: /usr/src/modules/fglrx/drm_os_linux.h:45: error: conflicting types for ‘irqreturn_t’ /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.30-1-common/include/linux/irqreturn.h:16: error: previous declaration of ‘irqreturn_t’ was here In file included from /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:433: /usr/src/modules/fglrx/drm_proc.h: In function ‘FGLDRM__vma_info’: /usr/src/modules/fglrx/drm_proc.h:497: warning: format ‘%08lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘phys_addr_t’ /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function ‘KCL_GetEffectiveUid’: /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:1407: error: ‘struct task_struct’ has no member named ‘euid’ /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function ‘KCL_PosixSecurityCapSetIPCLock’: /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:1781: error: ‘struct task_struct’ has no member named ‘cap_effective’ /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:1785: error: ‘struct task_struct’ has no member named ‘cap_effective’ /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function ‘KCL_InstallInterruptHandler’: /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:2663: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘request_irq’ from incompatible pointer type /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function ‘KCL_MEM_VM_GetRegionPhysAddrStr’: /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3225: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3226: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3227: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:3229: warning: return makes pointer from integer without a cast /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c: In function ‘KAS_Ih_Execute’: /usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.c:4204: warning: ‘return’ with no value, in function returning non-void make[5]: *** [/usr/src/modules/fglrx/firegl_public.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** [_module_/usr/src/modules/fglrx] Error 2 make[3]: *** [sub-make] Error 2 make[2]: *** [all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.30-1-amd64' make[1]: *** [build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/modules/fglrx' make: *** [kdist_image] Error 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Gary Dale schrieb: Package: fglrx-driver Version: 1:9-2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which linux-image-2.6.30 was installed, the fglrx driver stopped working. I could no longer get into X. Removing and reinstalling the driver under the kernel didn't help. Because the open source ATI drivers don't work, I'm left with the vesa driver as the only method for running X. I've also tried the installation method at http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-install-ati-fglrx-driver-in-debian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3543 but it fails during the driver install while trying to overwrite libglx.so - and no amount of trying has let me get around the error. Even if libglx.so is removed, I still can't overwrite it! ?? We are _not_ supporting the debs resulted by the ati installer! On Debian just do (but be sure to remove everything from your old installation): # apt-get install fglrx-driver fglrx-glx fglrx-source module-assisstant # m-a a-i fglrx And that was it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#542140: fglrx-driver: fglrx driver doesn't work with linux-image-2.6.30 (AMD64)
Package: fglrx-driver Version: 1:9-2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After doing a dist-upgrade a couple of days ago in which linux-image-2.6.30 was installed, the fglrx driver stopped working. I could no longer get into X. Removing and reinstalling the driver under the kernel didn't help. Because the open source ATI drivers don't work, I'm left with the vesa driver as the only method for running X. I've also tried the installation method at http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-install-ati-fglrx-driver-in-debian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3543 but it fails during the driver install while trying to overwrite libglx.so - and no amount of trying has let me get around the error. Even if libglx.so is removed, I still can't overwrite it! -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages fglrx-driver depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.27 Debian configuration management sy ii fglrx-glx 1:9-2-2proprietary libGL for the non-free ii laptop-detect 0.13.7 attempt to detect a laptop ii libc6 2.9-23 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libdrm2 2.4.12-1 Userspace interface to kernel DRM ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1] 7.0.3-7A free implementation of the OpenG ii libx11-6 2:1.2.2-1 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 2:1.0.4-1 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii libxinerama1 2:1.0.3-2 X11 Xinerama extension library ii libxrandr22:1.3.0-2 X11 RandR extension library ii libxrender1 1:0.9.4-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xserver-xorg 1:7.3+19 the X.Org X server Versions of packages fglrx-driver recommends: ii fglrx-atieventsd 1:9-2-2external events daemon for the non ii fglrx-glx 1:9-2-2proprietary libGL for the non-free pn fglrx-glx-ia32 (no description available) ii fglrx-source 1:9-2-2kernel module source for the non-f -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
