Bug#577725: python3-docutils
also sprach Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org [2011.05.29.2332 +0200]: * martin f krafft madd...@debian.org, 2011-05-29, 09:17: docutils-doc: - ships documentation - recommends python-docutils | python3-docutils Why the recommendation? Now that I think of it, recommendation is an overkill. Would Suggest be OK with you? I do not object, but I don't think there's a point in having documentation suggest or recommend anything. - python-docutils | python3-docutils is a bit cumbersome to type, maybe both packages could provide a common virtual package (say: docutils)? Do they have the same API? Are they interchangeable? There should no differences in the command line interface. Okay then. -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#577725: python3-docutils
also sprach Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org [2011.05.28.2013 +0200]: docutils-doc: - ships documentation - recommends python-docutils | python3-docutils Why the recommendation? Dear co-maintainers, what do you think? Does it sound sensible? Yes, it does. Thanks! - python-docutils | python3-docutils is a bit cumbersome to type, maybe both packages could provide a common virtual package (say: docutils)? Do they have the same API? Are they interchangeable? - What about existing virtual packages? python-docutils currently provides docutils-writer-manpage, docutils-writer-odt, python-odtwriter, rst2man, rst2odt. The odt ones are unused, there are 3 reverse build-dependencies for man ones. I'm a bit tempted to drop all of them entirely. +1 -- .''`. martin f. krafft madduck@d.o Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
Bug#577725: python3-docutils
* martin f krafft madd...@debian.org, 2011-05-29, 09:17: docutils-doc: - ships documentation - recommends python-docutils | python3-docutils Why the recommendation? Now that I think of it, recommendation is an overkill. Would Suggest be OK with you? - python-docutils | python3-docutils is a bit cumbersome to type, maybe both packages could provide a common virtual package (say: docutils)? Do they have the same API? Are they interchangeable? There should no differences in the command line interface. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#577725: python3-docutils
unblock 577725 with 573560 thanks It doesn't look like python-support is going to support Python 3.X, but we can use dh_python3 instead. In order to add support for Python 3.X, I'm going to split python-docutils to the following 4 packages: python-docutils: - ships Python 2.X modules - provides /usr/bin/* binaries via alternatives - depends on docutils-common - recommends docutils-doc (to be demoted to suggests in wheezy+1) python3-docutils: - ships Python 3.X modules - provides /usr/bin/* binaries via alternatives - depends on docutils-common - suggests docutils-doc docutils-common: - ships /etc/emacs/site-start.d/50python-docutils.el, /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/rst.el, and some common data files (templates, etc.) - recommends python-docutils | python3-docutils docutils-doc: - ships documentation - recommends python-docutils | python3-docutils Dear co-maintainers, what do you think? Does it sound sensible? After the split, packages that currently (build-)depends on python-docutils and uses only its command-line iterface could relax their (build-)dependency to python-docutils | python3-docutils. Some open questions: - python-docutils | python3-docutils is a bit cumbersome to type, maybe both packages could provide a common virtual package (say: docutils)? - What about existing virtual packages? python-docutils currently provides docutils-writer-manpage, docutils-writer-odt, python-odtwriter, rst2man, rst2odt. The odt ones are unused, there are 3 reverse build-dependencies for man ones. I'm a bit tempted to drop all of them entirely. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#577725: python3-docutils
Package: python-docutils Version: 0.6-3 Severity: wishlist docutils upsteam supports Python 3.X, so it would be nice if Debian package shipped modules for this version. -- Jakub Wilk signature.asc Description: Digital signature
