Bug#641865: Bug#635963: Should pootle be removed

2011-10-07 Thread Luca Falavigna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

reassign 641865 ftp.debian.org
severity 641865 normal
retitle 641865 RM: pootle -- RoQA; RC buggy, non compatible with django
tags 635963 - moreinfo
thanks

Il 04/10/2011 07:56, Christian PERRIER ha scritto:
 No objection from my side.

Asking for removal, then.
Nicolas, in case you don't agree, feel free to reply in the bug report.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=D/GH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#641865: Bug#635963: Should pootle be removed

2011-10-04 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Luca Falavigna (dktrkr...@debian.org):

  We very briefly discussed about this with Nicolas at DC11...and
  indeed, we regret that we don't have a pootle2 package to escape
  this problem.
 
 That's unfortunate to hear :(
 
 Provided there's no current updates that can bring pootle in shape, I'd
 go with a removal from unstable in the next few days unless you disagree
 with that.


No objection from my side.




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#641865: Bug#635963: Should pootle be removed

2011-10-03 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 17/09/2011 08:36, Christian PERRIER ha scritto:
 Nicolas, are you willing to provide an update for pootle? I see there
 are some RC bugs that need fixing. In case you don't/can't, what about
 removing it from unstable completely?
 
 Interest, but not enough skills, I'm afraid.
 
 I made some packaging changes to pootle during spring 2011. They're
 staging in SVN. The most difficult problem is indeed handling the
 upgrade from pootle 1 installs.
 
 We very briefly discussed about this with Nicolas at DC11...and
 indeed, we regret that we don't have a pootle2 package to escape
 this problem.

That's unfortunate to hear :(

Provided there's no current updates that can bring pootle in shape, I'd
go with a removal from unstable in the next few days unless you disagree
with that.

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
 `.  `'
   `-



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#635963: Should pootle be removed

2011-09-17 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Luca Falavigna (dktrkr...@debian.org):
 clone 635963 -1
 reassign -1 src:pootle
 found -1 2.0.5-0.3
 severity -1 serious
 tags -1 - moreinfo
 block 635963 by -1
 thanks
 
 
 Let's create a bug to track pootle progresses.
 
 Il 30/07/2011 17:17, Chris Lamb ha scritto:
  Nicolas, is pootle still active/maintained/useful, etc.? If so, would
  you like to take over maintaining python-django-djblets?
 
 Nicolas, are you willing to provide an update for pootle? I see there
 are some RC bugs that need fixing. In case you don't/can't, what about
 removing it from unstable completely?
 
 ( also CCed Christian, who showed interest for pootle in recent past )


Interest, but not enough skills, I'm afraid.

I made some packaging changes to pootle during spring 2011. They're
staging in SVN. The most difficult problem is indeed handling the
upgrade from pootle 1 installs.

We very briefly discussed about this with Nicolas at DC11...and
indeed, we regret that we don't have a pootle2 package to escape
this problem.



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#635963: Should pootle be removed

2011-09-16 Thread Luca Falavigna
clone 635963 -1
reassign -1 src:pootle
found -1 2.0.5-0.3
severity -1 serious
tags -1 - moreinfo
block 635963 by -1
thanks


Let's create a bug to track pootle progresses.

Il 30/07/2011 17:17, Chris Lamb ha scritto:
 Nicolas, is pootle still active/maintained/useful, etc.? If so, would
 you like to take over maintaining python-django-djblets?

Nicolas, are you willing to provide an update for pootle? I see there
are some RC bugs that need fixing. In case you don't/can't, what about
removing it from unstable completely?

( also CCed Christian, who showed interest for pootle in recent past )

-- 
  .''`.
 :  :' :   Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
 `.  `'
   `-



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature