Bug#701150: debsums falsing
Control: block -1 by 689508 689202 On 2013-02-22 05:19, Dave Steele wrote: While looking at the piatti piuparts report Andreas pointed to today, I noticed that failures are racking up for debsums modifications. http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/binutils-multiarch_2.22-7.1.log /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/strings /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/gprof these are diverted debsums (2.0.49) unstable; urgency=low * when querying dpkg-divert include the user specified root filesystem in --admindir (Closes: #632463) piatti is running 2.0.48+nmu3 I believe that debsums should not report failures for modified files which are owned by multiple packages, or are subject to diversion. Why not? I'm running a locally modified debsums from wheezy here with two patches applied: * correct symlink lookup (debsums --root escapes the chroot and looks up files in the host system which may have different content ... #689202) * ignore obsolete conffiles (#689508, local HACK) and that solved the debsums issues for me For #689202 I could do a NMU, but unfortunately for #689508 I cant offer a nice clean solution. Then we could get debsums unblocked, into wheezy and backport it and finally install it on piatti. Or we could add a modified copy of debsums to piuparts, only to be used when running from git as on piatti ... Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701150: debsums falsing
Hi, On Freitag, 22. Februar 2013, Andreas Beckmann wrote: For #689202 I could do a NMU, but unfortunately for #689508 I cant offer a nice clean solution. Then we could get debsums unblocked, into wheezy and backport it and finally install it on piatti. Or we could add a modified copy of debsums to piuparts, only to be used when running from git as on piatti ... Or upload the wheezy version to backports.org and install that on piatti. I've also asked #debian-admin what they think about using wheezy for the new piatti VM (piatti will be moved in a VM sometime in future.) and they think its a good idea. 2-3 months is my guess for that. cheers, Holger
Bug#701150: debsums falsing
On 2013-02-22 18:27, Holger Levsen wrote: Or upload the wheezy version to backports.org and install that on piatti. Not perfect, but still better than debsums/squeeze. Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701150: [Piuparts-devel] Bug#701150: debsums falsing
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote: Control: block -1 by 689508 689202 debsums (2.0.49) unstable; urgency=low * when querying dpkg-divert include the user specified root filesystem in --admindir (Closes: #632463) piatti is running 2.0.48+nmu3 Perhaps this is why I don't have any problems with debsums in my setup. I believe that debsums should not report failures for modified files which are owned by multiple packages, or are subject to diversion. Why not? personally, I don't want to see gnome-gmail failed for modifying /usr/sbin/update-icon-caches -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#701150: debsums falsing
package: piuparts severity: normal While looking at the piatti piuparts report Andreas pointed to today, I noticed that failures are racking up for debsums modifications. The debsums man page, under Caveats, says that files which have been replaced by another package may be erroneously reported as changed. Multiple ownership can cause a false. It seems that a significant portion of new failures are for debsums, and a significant portion of these fall in this case. http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/binutils-multiarch_2.22-7.1.log /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/strings /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/gprof /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/readelf /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/size /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/nm /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/strip /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/ranlib /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/ar /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/addr2line /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/objcopy /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj/usr/bin/objdump 0m27.1s DEBUG: Command failed (status=2), but ignoring error: ['debsums', '--root', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmpEXGvJj', '-ac'] 0m27.1s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot: $ apt-file search /usr/bin/strings binutils: /usr/bin/strings binutils-multiarch: /usr/bin/strings I've seen this with dpkg diversions as well: http://piuparts.debian.org/squeeze2wheezy/fail/gnome-icon-theme_3.4.0-2.log /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmplq_ENa/usr/sbin/update-icon-caches 2m56.0s DEBUG: Command failed (status=2), but ignoring error: ['debsums', '--root', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmplq_ENa', '-ac'] 2m56.0s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot: http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/gnome-gmail_1.8.2-1.log /org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmp_JcjF7/usr/sbin/update-icon-caches 2m17.6s DEBUG: Command failed (status=2), but ignoring error: ['debsums', '--root', '/org/piuparts.debian.org/tmp/tmp_JcjF7', '-ac'] 2m17.6s ERROR: FAIL: debsums reports modifications inside the chroot: $ dpkg --search /usr/sbin/update-icon-caches diversion by libgtk-3-bin from: /usr/sbin/update-icon-caches diversion by libgtk-3-bin to: /usr/sbin/update-icon-caches.gtk2 libgtk-3-bin, libgtk2.0-bin: /usr/sbin/update-icon-caches I believe that debsums should not report failures for modified files which are owned by multiple packages, or are subject to diversion. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
