Bug#727611: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34)
Am 25.10.2013 04:41, schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | Debian still has graphiz-2.2x. There is a reason I did file this as a wishlist | issue. Well that is sort of silly. For as long this builds on Debian I am not going to do anything, realistically. Let me know when a new / updated graphviz hits Debian. According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/graphviz.html, graphviz will be involved with the ruby1.8-removal transition. So it won't be that far away, that somebody has to either backport ruby1.9 or ruby2.0 support to graphviz, drop the ruby extension, or update graphviz to a version compatible with a new ruby (and lua, and guile). And I say this as a heavy Ubuntu user -- with maybe a dozen machines between home and work. But my workflow _for Debian_ is still the same, and if you insist that Ubuntu (downstream) has to differ than this is really an issue for patches at your end (as you've done, doing your users a disservice by removing the GraphLayout plugin) and not something I can do. Not sure about the unfriendlyness. It's more of a disservice to ship year's old software (both graphviz and ggobi), and in this case you have to outwage having a new graphviz working with recent interpreter versions and working on more architectures, or a feature complete ggobi. So yes, if you feel that this issue won't hit ggobi for jessie, feel free to ignore it. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#727611: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34)
On 25 October 2013 at 12:08, Matthias Klose wrote: | Am 25.10.2013 04:41, schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | | Debian still has graphiz-2.2x. There is a reason I did file this as a wishlist | | issue. | | Well that is sort of silly. For as long this builds on Debian I am not going | to do anything, realistically. Let me know when a new / updated graphviz hits | Debian. | | According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/graphviz.html, graphviz will be | involved with the ruby1.8-removal transition. So it won't be that far away, that | somebody has to either backport ruby1.9 or ruby2.0 support to graphviz, drop the | ruby extension, or update graphviz to a version compatible with a new ruby (and | lua, and guile). Ok. If you look at the debian/changelog for ggobi, you see that graphviz was the reason for a lot of changes. I don't expect that to change -- graphviz seems to be a difficult package which maybe isn't or wasn't always packaged with the fullest focus. Such is life. Graphviz is actually pretty nice. Ggobi is a pretty marginal package which can work with or without, so we have no issue to fight over. I just wanted to make sure I was not missing anything. | And I say this as a heavy Ubuntu user -- with maybe a dozen machines between | home and work. But my workflow _for Debian_ is still the same, and if you | insist that Ubuntu (downstream) has to differ than this is really an issue | for patches at your end (as you've done, doing your users a disservice by | removing the GraphLayout plugin) and not something I can do. | | Not sure about the unfriendlyness. It's more of a disservice to ship year's old | software (both graphviz and ggobi), and in this case you have to outwage having Ggobi has gone somewhat stale upstream. You will notice that we have 2.2.10 whereas debwatch only sees 2.2.9 -- so I already went half an upstream patch ahead (in cooperation with upstream who I know prtetty well). So I am not behind, they simple do not release anymore. But I can't do anything about graphviz. | a new graphviz working with recent interpreter versions and working on more | architectures, or a feature complete ggobi. So yes, if you feel that this issue | won't hit ggobi for jessie, feel free to ignore it. Will try to keep an eye on it, but also keep the status quo (with the older graphviz) in Debian itself. Thanks as always for all your work concerning Ubuntu and Debian. Cheers, Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#727611: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34)
Package: ggobi Version: 2.1.10-4 Severity: wishlist ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34). If there any pointers for such a port ... or build ggobi without graphviz support. see https://launchpad.net/bugs/1244263 for the build log. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#727611: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34)
Hi Doko, On 24 October 2013 at 17:05, Matthias Klose wrote: | Package: ggobi | Version: 2.1.10-4 | Severity: wishlist | | ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34). If there any | pointers for such a port ... or build ggobi without graphviz support. Thanks, will look into this and also report upstream which has gotten pretty quiet of late. Dirk | | see https://launchpad.net/bugs/1244263 for the build log. -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#727611: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34)
On 24 October 2013 at 17:05, Matthias Klose wrote: | Package: ggobi | Version: 2.1.10-4 | Severity: wishlist | | ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34). If there any | pointers for such a port ... or build ggobi without graphviz support. | | see https://launchpad.net/bugs/1244263 for the build log. One more follow-up: Not only does this build cleanly on Debian as shown by https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ggobi it also just build cleanly again in my chroot. I'd be happy to share the build log. Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#727611: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34)
Control: reopen -1 Am 25.10.2013 04:05, schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: On 24 October 2013 at 17:05, Matthias Klose wrote: | Package: ggobi | Version: 2.1.10-4 | Severity: wishlist | | ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34). If there any | pointers for such a port ... or build ggobi without graphviz support. | | see https://launchpad.net/bugs/1244263 for the build log. One more follow-up: Not only does this build cleanly on Debian as shown by https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ggobi it also just build cleanly again in my chroot. I'd be happy to share the build log. see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ggobi/2.1.10-4build1/+build/5154829 Debian still has graphiz-2.2x. There is a reason I did file this as a wishlist issue. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#727611: ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34)
tags 727611 +wontfix thanks On 25 October 2013 at 04:13, Matthias Klose wrote: | Control: reopen -1 | | Am 25.10.2013 04:05, schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel: | | On 24 October 2013 at 17:05, Matthias Klose wrote: | | Package: ggobi | | Version: 2.1.10-4 | | Severity: wishlist | | | | ggobi needs porting from libgraph to libcgraph (graphviz-2.34). If there any | | pointers for such a port ... or build ggobi without graphviz support. | | | | see https://launchpad.net/bugs/1244263 for the build log. | | One more follow-up: Not only does this build cleanly on Debian as shown by | | https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ggobi | | it also just build cleanly again in my chroot. I'd be happy to share the | build log. | | see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ggobi/2.1.10-4build1/+build/5154829 | | Debian still has graphiz-2.2x. There is a reason I did file this as a wishlist | issue. Well that is sort of silly. For as long this builds on Debian I am not going to do anything, realistically. Let me know when a new / updated graphviz hits Debian. And I say this as a heavy Ubuntu user -- with maybe a dozen machines between home and work. But my workflow _for Debian_ is still the same, and if you insist that Ubuntu (downstream) has to differ than this is really an issue for patches at your end (as you've done, doing your users a disservice by removing the GraphLayout plugin) and not something I can do. Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
