Bug#819319: apcupsd: BD-Uninstallable on kfreebsd
notfound 819319 apcupsd/3.14.12-1.2 close 819319 thanks Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > My understanding is that apcupsd is BD-Uninstallable because of bug > #810982 net-snmp: FTBFS on kfreebsd10 You were right, as it has built now on kfreebsd. Thanks, and sorry! Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#819319: apcupsd: BD-Uninstallable on kfreebsd
Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > > Hm, but on kfreebsd the package libusb2-dev "Provides: libusb-1.0-0-dev", > > isn't that enough? > > Uhhhm... maybe that works. Although, sbuild does have some quirks with > its dependency handling, so I'm not totally sure yet. I think it is okay, as long as the Build-Depends: libusb-1.0-0-dev doesn't have any version constraints. There is an example here: https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_unstable_main/1459141202/packages/garmin-forerunner-tools.html#476ee054ce6ed51dee2fc4df39825749 where libusb-1.0-0-dev (>= 1.0.9) is not satisfied by the "Provides". apcupsd doesn't do that so should be fine, I think. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#819319: apcupsd: BD-Uninstallable on kfreebsd
Control: block -1 by 810982 (putting the bug back into Cc: now) Hi! > Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > The change to apcupsd Build-Depends is not right for kfreebsd. On > > Linux, libusb 1.0 is provided by libusb-1.0-0-dev, whereas on kfreebsd > > it is provided by libusb2-dev. Please find a patch attached for this. Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > Hm, but on kfreebsd the package libusb2-dev "Provides: libusb-1.0-0-dev", > isn't that enough? Uhhhm... maybe that works. Although, sbuild does have some quirks with its dependency handling, so I'm not totally sure yet. > My understanding is that apcupsd is BD-Uninstallable because of bug > #810982 net-snmp: FTBFS on kfreebsd10 > > I think that maybe you looked at the buildd status for hurd-i386 by > mistake :-) Yeah, it looks that way! Really sorry about this. The dose report shows the same thing - that kfreebsd's libsnmp30 is out-of-date (since the perl transition) and uninstallable: https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_unstable_main/1459141202/packages/apcupsd.html#b7d8592357d20001dfd6e0ded0b27b85 So I think we just wait on #810982 to be fixed in sid. > I have a machine running this version of apcupsd with working > USB-communication, compiled for jessie-kfreebsd. Me too, it seems to work fine once it is built. Thanks! Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#819319: apcupsd: BD-Uninstallable on kfreebsd
Package: src:apcupsd Version: 3.14.12-1.2 Severity: important Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd Hi, The change to apcupsd Build-Depends is not right for kfreebsd. On Linux, libusb 1.0 is provided by libusb-1.0-0-dev, whereas on kfreebsd it is provided by libusb2-dev. Please find a patch attached for this. Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: kFreeBSD 10.1-0-amd64 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash --- debian/control.orig 2016-03-26 15:49:31.0 + +++ debian/control 2016-03-26 15:51:31.635473356 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: extra Maintainer: Giuseppe IuculanoUploaders: Stefan Ritter -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7), autotools-dev, quilt, mawk | awk, libgd-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libsnmp-dev, libssl-dev, libwrap0-dev, po-debconf, texinfo, tcpd, rst2pdf, python-docutils, pkg-config, libusb-1.0-0-dev +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7), autotools-dev, quilt, mawk | awk, libgd-dev, libncurses5-dev | libncurses-dev, libsnmp-dev, libssl-dev, libwrap0-dev, po-debconf, texinfo, tcpd, rst2pdf, python-docutils, pkg-config, libusb-1.0-0-dev [!kfreebsd-any], libusb2-dev [kfreebsd-any] Standards-Version: 3.8.4 Homepage: http://www.apcupsd.com/