Bug#828299: fetchmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
On 2016-11-03 23:39:32 [+0100], László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > OK, it remained the same then. May you try the work in progress > update[1]? I'm off for sleeping. :-/ yup, worked. > Thanks, > Laszlo/GCS Sebastian
Bug#828299: fetchmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-11-03 22:02:23 [+0100], László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: >> Nope. Tried in a loop of ten with -j2, other ten with -j4 and another >> ten with -j8 and it was working correctly. What's the result / current >> problem at your end? > > As you see in [0]: OK, it remained the same then. May you try the work in progress update[1]? I'm off for sleeping. :-/ Thanks, Laszlo/GCS [1] dget -x http://www.barcikacomp.hu/gcs/fetchmail_6.3.26-3.dsc
Bug#828299: fetchmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
On 2016-11-03 22:02:23 [+0100], László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > wrote: > > On 2016-11-03 07:45:16 [+0100], Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > fetchmail builds against openssl 1.1.0. So we are good here. > > fetchmail fails to build with -j4. > > What do we do now? I retitled the bug. Can you reproduce this on your > > end? > Nope. Tried in a loop of ten with -j2, other ten with -j4 and another > ten with -j8 and it was working correctly. What's the result / current > problem at your end? As you see in [0]: |dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64 | fakeroot debian/rules clean |dh_testdir |dh_testroot |rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp |[ ! -f Makefile ] || /usr/bin/make distclean |rm -f po/*.gmo config.sub config.guess config.status |dh_clean -X.orig -X.rej | debian/rules build-arch |set -e |set -e |dh_testdir |dh_testdir |/usr/bin/make |make[1]: Entering directory '/<>' |make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. |make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>' |cp /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub |debian/rules:138: recipe for target 'build-stamp' failed |make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 |make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs |cp /usr/share/misc/config.guess config.guess |./configure --build x86_64-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr --enable-nls \ | --disable-fallback --with-ssl=/usr --enable-NTLM --enable-SDPS --with-kerberos5 --with-gssapi=/usr … |sed -e "s/-lcrypt//; s/-lk5crypto//g;" < Makefile > Makefile.tmp |mv Makefile.tmp Makefile |touch configure-stamp |dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build-arch gave error exit status 2 | |Build finished at 2016-08-26T18:31:07Z The build-arch and clean rule run in parallel. This was triggered by "sbuild -j4 fetch….dsc" [0] https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-08-26/failed/fetchmail_6.3.26-2_amd64-2016-08-26T18%3A30%3A26Z > Laszlo/GCS Sebastian
Bug#828299: fetchmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-11-03 07:45:16 [+0100], Andreas Henriksson wrote: > fetchmail builds against openssl 1.1.0. So we are good here. > fetchmail fails to build with -j4. > What do we do now? I retitled the bug. Can you reproduce this on your > end? Nope. Tried in a loop of ten with -j2, other ten with -j4 and another ten with -j8 and it was working correctly. What's the result / current problem at your end? Laszlo/GCS
Bug#828299: fetchmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Hello Sebastian Andrzej Siewior. On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > control: retitle: -1 fetchmail: FTBFS if building in parallel > > On 2016-11-03 07:45:16 [+0100], Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > Hello Kurt Roeckx. > Hi, > > > The failure in this build log didn't look like it was really openssl > > related. > > I've tried rebuilding the package which succeded for me. > > > > Could you please double-check here and possibly close this bug report > > if there's no issue? > > fetchmail builds against openssl 1.1.0. So we are good here. > fetchmail fails to build with -j4. > What do we do now? I retitled the bug. Can you reproduce this on your > end? Disclaimer: I'm not the maintainer. (And your retitle seems to have failed? One too many : after retitle?) (And as already mentioned to Kurt, you might want to unblock the openssl transition as well as this bug is not related to openssl.) It seems build-arch depends on configure-stamp and build-stamp. The latter two gets executed in parallel which results in build-stamp getting executer before configure-stamp and thus the failure. Since the fetchmail packaging currently uses a deprecated debhelper compat level 7, preferrably it would get updated to a current level (and switched to use the debhelper sequencer while at it). While doing that upgrading/cleanup work on the packaging this bug will likely go away. Another (quick and dirty) option would be to completely disable parallel execution of debian/rules, eg. by adding ".NOTPARALLEL:". Another option that could also work is to make the build-stamp target depend on configure-stamp hopefully fixes the parallelism bug and probably a theoretically correct change no matter what. Regards, Andreas Henriksson PS. Not volunteering for any of the above myself.
Bug#828299: fetchmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
control: retitle: -1 fetchmail: FTBFS if building in parallel On 2016-11-03 07:45:16 [+0100], Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello Kurt Roeckx. Hi, > The failure in this build log didn't look like it was really openssl related. > I've tried rebuilding the package which succeded for me. > > Could you please double-check here and possibly close this bug report > if there's no issue? fetchmail builds against openssl 1.1.0. So we are good here. fetchmail fails to build with -j4. What do we do now? I retitled the bug. Can you reproduce this on your end? > Regards, > Andreas Henriksson Sebastian
Bug#828299: fetchmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 05:44:54PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 07:45:16AM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: [...] > > I've tried rebuilding the package which succeded for me. > > > > Could you please double-check here and possibly close this bug report > > if there's no issue? > > It might have been caused by calling dpkg-buildpackage -j8. If > that's the case you could look into that your debian/rules files > actually has all the proper dependecies. This isn't really > something that should be supported. There might still be an issue here sure, but this is not my package and I won't dive into that. Just saying that you might want to unmark fetchmail as an openssl 1.1.0 transition blocker. Regards, Andreas Henriksson
Bug#828299: fetchmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 07:45:16AM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello Kurt Roeckx. > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:21:39PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Source: fetchmail > > Version: 6.3.26-2 > > Severity: important > > Control: block 827061 by -1 > > > > Hi, > > > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. > [...] > > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/fetchmail_6.3.26-2_amd64-20160529-1418 > [...] > > The failure in this build log didn't look like it was really openssl related. > I've tried rebuilding the package which succeded for me. > > Could you please double-check here and possibly close this bug report > if there's no issue? It might have been caused by calling dpkg-buildpackage -j8. If that's the case you could look into that your debian/rules files actually has all the proper dependecies. This isn't really something that should be supported. Kurt
Bug#828299: fetchmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Hello Kurt Roeckx. On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 12:21:39PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Source: fetchmail > Version: 6.3.26-2 > Severity: important > Control: block 827061 by -1 > > Hi, > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. [...] > https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/fetchmail_6.3.26-2_amd64-20160529-1418 [...] The failure in this build log didn't look like it was really openssl related. I've tried rebuilding the package which succeded for me. Could you please double-check here and possibly close this bug report if there's no issue? Regards, Andreas Henriksson
Bug#828299: fetchmail: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Source: fetchmail Version: 6.3.26-2 Severity: important Control: block 827061 by -1 Hi, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: https://breakpoint.cc/openssl-1.1-rebuild-2016-05-29/Attempted/fetchmail_6.3.26-2_amd64-20160529-1418 On https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/1.1_API_Changes you can see various of the reasons why it might fail. There are also updated man pages at https://www.openssl.org/docs/manmaster/ that should contain useful information. There is a libssl-dev package available in experimental that contains a recent snapshot, I suggest you try building against that to see if everything works. If you have problems making things work, feel free to contact us. Kurt
