Bug#877783: spyne_2.13.11a0-0.1_source.changes REJECTED
On Tue, 2019-12-17 at 09:52 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > The "unlikely scenario" is reality NOW. Maybe you did not check but > spyne is already gone in testing. > That is what I wanted to draw your attention at. Ahh OK. I didn't realise you considered it being dropped from testing as important. Unlike you I don't consider it to be particularly significant. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#877783: spyne_2.13.11a0-0.1_source.changes REJECTED
Am Di., 17. Dez. 2019 um 00:52 Uhr schrieb Russell Stuart : > > On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 19:19 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > > Yes, I missed that. But maybe you have made up your mind now that > > spyne got auto-removed from testing. > > Isn't it better to have an alpha version in testing than no version > > at all? > > As I said in my reply to the bug report, the "no version at all" > scenario seems unlikely to me even if Spyne for Python 3 doesn't get The "unlikely scenario" is reality NOW. Maybe you did not check but spyne is already gone in testing. That is what I wanted to draw your attention at. > released. But it does seem like Spyne for Python 3 will be stable > before the bullseye deadlines hit. And I will upload it as soon as an I > am aware it has been released. > > Regardless of what happens I use spyne in my day job, so I will > continue to package spyne for Debian. Whether it ends up in Debian is > an open question, but I am a DD :)
Bug#877783: spyne_2.13.11a0-0.1_source.changes REJECTED
On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 19:19 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > Yes, I missed that. But maybe you have made up your mind now that > spyne got auto-removed from testing. > Isn't it better to have an alpha version in testing than no version > at all? As I said in my reply to the bug report, the "no version at all" scenario seems unlikely to me even if Spyne for Python 3 doesn't get released. But it does seem like Spyne for Python 3 will be stable before the bullseye deadlines hit. And I will upload it as soon as an I am aware it has been released. Regardless of what happens I use spyne in my day job, so I will continue to package spyne for Debian. Whether it ends up in Debian is an open question, but I am a DD :) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#877783: spyne_2.13.11a0-0.1_source.changes REJECTED
On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 13:25 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > Hi Sandro, > > would you please reupload with the binary package? The package is > still available on https://mentors.debian.net/package/spyne. Perhaps you missed it as I only replied to the Debian bug, but I am not OK with an alpha version ending up in testing: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877783#30 If you still want to do this upload the alpha version to experimental. If you do proceed any with uploading the alpha version to unstable I will replace it with the old version. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
