Bug#889607: no such package as sse-support, just sse2/3/4.2
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hello, على الأحد 4 شباط 2018 17:56، كتب Adam Borowski: > Hi! >> nanopolish [:i386] >> The package would not migrate to testing because it was not installable >> on i386 for lack of sse-support. > > There never was a package by that name. The only variants are sse2-support > [any-i386] sse3-support [any-i386 any-amd64] sse4.2-support [any-i386 > any-amd64] and stuff for architectures you're not interested in. > > I really doubt you're looking for sse1 in particular -- I expect your > package uses a newer variant; a package of this kind doesn't really care > about CPUs so old anyway, thus the distinction doesn't matter. > > (Note that marking packages that use a non-base CPU extension this way is > controversial -- but no one implemented a better solution yet.) > Thanks for pointing that out. I have to see what my co-maintainer had in mind when adding this. > > As for this RM, it won't work as your package still tries to build on i386, > which will reintroduce nanopolish:i386 as soon as ftpmasters remove it. > Thus, you'd need to upload a new version first. I already did an upload before filing this bug, so it's now showing as BD-Uninstallable on i386. Thanks and regards Afif -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name
Bug#889607: no such package as sse-support, just sse2/3/4.2
Hi! > nanopolish [:i386] > The package would not migrate to testing because it was not installable > on i386 for lack of sse-support. There never was a package by that name. The only variants are sse2-support [any-i386] sse3-support [any-i386 any-amd64] sse4.2-support [any-i386 any-amd64] and stuff for architectures you're not interested in. I really doubt you're looking for sse1 in particular -- I expect your package uses a newer variant; a package of this kind doesn't really care about CPUs so old anyway, thus the distinction doesn't matter. (Note that marking packages that use a non-base CPU extension this way is controversial -- but no one implemented a better solution yet.) As for this RM, it won't work as your package still tries to build on i386, which will reintroduce nanopolish:i386 as soon as ftpmasters remove it. Thus, you'd need to upload a new version first. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ The bill with 3 years prison for mentioning Polish concentration ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ camps is back. What about KL Warschau (operating until 1956)? ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Zgoda? Łambinowice? Most ex-German KLs? If those were "soviet ⠈⠳⣄ puppets", Bereza Kartuska? Sikorski's camps in UK (thanks Brits!)?
