Bug#975694: [logcheck-database] stop filtering smartd attribute change events

2024-05-12 Thread Richard Lewis
control: tags -1 + moreinfo
thanks

On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 13:13:14 +0500 Alex Volkov  wrote:

> IDK how it was in 2006 when this stupid decision was made, but nowadays
> `smartd` has all the needed filtering features in itself, in a case someone
> gets "annoyed" by attribute changes. Yeah, sure, it "can send warning mails",
> but by default only in a case of attribute FAILURE, and some Old-age related
> attributes NEVER fail (like Power-On Hours on WD, which counts down to 1 and
> just sits happily there, never getting to "failing" 0). In such cases at least
> seeing them changing (or not) is useful. Overall, it's not the place for a
> *maintainer* to decide (instead of a user) which events of a third-party
> package are annoying and which are not.

Following up on the above  bug from 2020 -- we need more information
here: what is the issue that you would like fixed?
you can already (even in 2020) add or subtract any rules for logcheck
that you like. smartd has a way to alert you to issues, but
that is nothing to do with logcheck.

in the absence of a clearer statement we would need to close this one.



Bug#975694: [logcheck-database] stop filtering smartd attribute change events

2020-11-25 Thread Alex Volkov
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.3.20
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

IDK how it was in 2006 when this stupid decision was made, but nowadays 
`smartd` has all the needed filtering features in itself, in a case someone 
gets "annoyed" by attribute changes. Yeah, sure, it "can send warning mails", 
but by default only in a case of attribute FAILURE, and some Old-age related 
attributes NEVER fail (like Power-On Hours on WD, which counts down to 1 and 
just sits happily there, never getting to "failing" 0). In such cases at least 
seeing them changing (or not) is useful. Overall, it's not the place for a 
*maintainer* to decide (instead of a user) which events of a third-party 
package are annoying and which are not.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: 
Kernel:   Linux 5.8.10-bootes0-p-1000

Debian Release: 10.6
  991 stable  security.debian.org 
  991 stable  ftp.fi.debian.org 
  990 buster-backports ftp.debian.org 
   99 testing ftp.fi.debian.org 
   99 stable-backports www.deb-multimedia.org 
   99 stable  www.deb-multimedia.org 
  500 stable  deb.torproject.org 
  500 buster  ookla.bintray.com 
  500 buster  linux.dropbox.com 

--- Package information. ---
Package's Depends field is empty.

Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.