Bug#323895: marked as done (libglademm2.0: builds a library package with the same name and different ABI on rebuild)
Your message dated Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:54:30 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line libgnomeuimm2.0 and libglademm2.0 removed from testing/unstable has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Aug 2005 06:37:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 18 23:37:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-038.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (quetzlcoatl.dodds.net) [66.93.39.38] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E60VJ-0005dp-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:37:25 -0700 Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 545063AEB; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libglademm2.0: builds a library package with the same name and different ABI on rebuild X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:37:19 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libglademm2.0 Severity: serious libglademm2.0-1c102 is a shared library that exports C++ interfaces, which means that it must undergo the transition described at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html if the package is to remain in Debian. However, since this library package appears to be superseded by libglademm2.4 and has only trivial non-library reverse-dependencies, I have no intention of NMUing this package. Instead, if no one speaks up to indicate that the library is still needed, I will request the removal of libgnomeuimm2.0 and libglademm2.0 from unstable. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: alpha Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-generic Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 323895-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 06:54:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 23 23:54:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJ3vb-0008WH-00; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:54:31 -0700 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1DA26704D; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:54:30 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgnomeuimm2.0 and libglademm2.0 removed from testing/unstable Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable libgnomeuimm2.0 and libglademm2.0 are obsolete and have been removed from both testing and unstable at the request of the release team, so these bugs are no longer relevant. Cheers, --=20 Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDNPgmKN6ufymYLloRAuVeAJ4q08ZSnK5z/FPPOu5ugqSdH2k7agCdG69F A6tYunUZRzIu7iPIcrA5umA= =Iiy+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --3MwIy2ne0vdjdPXF-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Bug#329832: Fixed already
close 329832 2.10.1-4 merge 329832 329711 thanks -- Pinky, Are You Pondering What I'm Pondering? I think so Brain, but who wants to see Snow White and the Seven Samuri? Pinky and the Brain in Big in Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329884: packagesearch_2.0.1 (arm,hppa,m68k): FTBFS: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
Package: packagesearch Version: 2.0.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi Benjamin, In addition to the PIC problem in the shared libraries, packagesearch has failed to build on hppa with the following error, and will almost certainly also fail to build on arm and m68k due to the same bug: [...] g++ -c -pipe -O2 kg-config --cflags libtagcoll1 libdebtags1 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -W -D__DEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_CORE_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_XML_LIB -DQT_QT3SUPPORT_LIB -DQT3_SUPPORT -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I/usr/include/qt4/Qt3Support -I/usr/include/qt4/QtXml -I/usr/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/include/qt4 -I.moc -I.ui -o .obj/runcommandinxterm.o runcommandinxterm.cpp runcommandinxterm.cpp: In member function 'std::string NException::SimpleString::_ZTv0_n16_NK10NException12SimpleString11descriptionEv() const': runcommandinxterm.cpp:120: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs. make[2]: *** [.obj/runcommandinxterm.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory /build/buildd/packagesearch-2.0.1/src' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 [...] A full build log can be found at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=packagesearchver=2.0.1arch=hppastamp=1127493639file=logas=raw. This is a (by now) well-known bug in gcc-4.0, which unfortunately will probably take a while to resolve. In order to work around the bug, it is recommended that you build-depend on g++-3.4 [arm hppa m68k] and use that compiler explicitly on those architectures, as described by Adeodato Simó here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325361: libpango1.0-common: Postinstallation script dies because /etc/defoma/config/pango.conf has not been unpacked
tags 325361 + unreproducible severity 325361 normal thanks On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 19:20:55 -0500, Eric Christopherson wrote: I did some investigating and found that /etc/defoma/config/pango.conf is supposed to be provided by libpango1.0-common, but did not in fact exist. I don't know why it wasn't unpacked before the postinst ran, That file is in the package and should have been installed on the system at the point the postinst ran. It is not a bug of the postinst script that it assumes this file is already installed on the system; see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-unpackphase The only scenarios I can think of in which this type of problem occurs are ones that involve either a bug in dpkg or something on the system interfering with files owned by the package management system (deliberately or accidentally e.g. through filesystem corruption). These are not scenarios that a regular package's postinst script needs to take into account. I have tagged this report accordingly. If you can provide us with a scenario with which to reproduce this problem which doesn't have these characteristics, please let us know. Ray -- Scary piece of history: `The very first use of Unix in the real business of Bell Labs was to type and produce patent applications' Dennis Ritchie in http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dmr/odd.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: libpango1.0-common: Postinstallation script dies because /etc/defoma/config/pango.conf has not been unpacked
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 325361 + unreproducible Bug#325361: libpango1.0-common: Postinstallation script dies because /etc/defoma/config/pango.conf has not been unpacked There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible severity 325361 normal Bug#325361: libpango1.0-common: Postinstallation script dies because /etc/defoma/config/pango.conf has not been unpacked Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329886: pngcrush broken by new libpng packages
Package: pngcrush Version: 1.5.10-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable $ pngcrush pngcrush: relocation error: pngcrush: symbol png_iCCP, version PNG12_0 not defined in file libpng12.so.0 with link time reference -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages pngcrush depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-3 PNG library - runtime ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime pngcrush recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329888: [hppa] binutils breaks hppa kernel build, bad operands of fic,m
Package: binutils Version: 2.16.1cvs20050902-1 Severity: grave Kerne 2.6.12-7/8 FTBFS because of some misassembly of the following assembly line : 1: fic,m %r23(%sr3, %r26) The full build log is at : http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=linux-2.6ver=2.6.12-8arch=hppastamp=1127531928file=logas=raw AS arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.o arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S: Assembler messages: arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:952: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:953: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:954: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:955: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:956: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:957: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:958: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:959: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:960: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:961: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:962: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:963: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:964: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:965: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:966: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:968: Error: Invalid operands arch/parisc/kernel/pacache.S:990: Error: Invalid operands Preliminary studies show that binutils indeed does the wrong thing here, and that the above are perfectly valid assembly instructions, this is at least what the hppa guys tell me. A fix would be greatly appreciated in order to migrate the new kernels to testing, since the version in testing breaks G5 powerpc64 kernels, not counting assorted security fixes. Friendly, Sven Luther -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages binutils depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329889: ethereal: depends on experimental versions of gtk and pango
Package: ethereal Version: 0.10.12-5 Severity: serious The version of ethereal in unstable depends on libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.8.0) and libpango1.0-0 (= 1.10.0). Both of these are from experimental. to Avoid this in future, please build your packages in a pristine, up to date pbuilder sid chroot, or only upload source packages. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#315413: pdfkit.framework: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): no matching function for call to 'TextFlow::TextFlow(TextBlock*)'
Hi Brent, I've prepared an NMU for this RC bug and uploaded it to the DELAYED/3-day queue on gluck. Please find the diff attached (Andreas's patch plus changelog). Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ diff -u pdfkit.framework-0.8/debian/changelog pdfkit.framework-0.8/debian/changelog --- pdfkit.framework-0.8/debian/changelog +++ pdfkit.framework-0.8/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +pdfkit.framework (0.8-2.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Medium-urgency upload for RC bugfix. + * Fix missing class forward-declarations, so the package builds +under gcc-4.0 (closes: #315413). + + -- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 24 Sep 2005 01:09:29 -0700 + pdfkit.framework (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Apply Robert Millan's patch from BTS (Closes: #286408): only in patch2: unchanged: --- pdfkit.framework-0.8.orig/xpdf/xpdf-3.00/xpdf/TextOutputDev.h +++ pdfkit.framework-0.8/xpdf/xpdf-3.00/xpdf/TextOutputDev.h @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ class GfxFont; class GfxState; class UnicodeMap; +class TextBlock; +class TextPage; +class TextLineFrag; // signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329891: socketapi_1.3.2-2 (arm,hppa,m68k): FTBFS: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101
Package: socketapi Version: 1.3.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi Anibal, The latest upload of socketapi has failed to build on arm and m68k, and will also fail to build on hppa eventually, with the following error: [...] /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -DSCTP_SOCKET_API -Wall -O0 -g -DLINUX -O0 -g -Wall -DLINUX -c -o libsctpsocket_la-internetaddress.lo est -f 'internetaddress.cc' || echo './'nternetaddress.cc g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -DSCTP_SOCKET_API -Wall -O0 -g -DLINUX -O0 -g -Wall -DLINUX -c internetaddress.cc -MT libsctpsocket_la-internetaddress.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libsctpsocket_la-internetaddress.TPlo -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libsctpsocket_la-internetaddress.o internetaddress.cc: In member function 'String InternetAddress::_ZTv0_n40_NK15InternetAddress16getAddressStringEj(cardinal) const': internetaddress.cc:763: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs. make[2]: *** [libsctpsocket_la-internetaddress.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory /build/buildd/socketapi-1.3.2/socketapi' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 [...] A full build log can be found at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=socketapiver=1.3.2-2arch=armstamp=1124528994file=logas=raw. This is a (by now) well-known bug in gcc-4.0, which unfortunately will probably take a while to resolve. In order to work around the bug, it is recommended that you build-depend on g++-3.4 [arm hppa m68k] and use that compiler explicitly on those architectures, as described by Adeodato Simó here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329886: pngcrush broken by new libpng packages
reassign 329886 libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-3 thanks On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:14:54AM -0600, Liam Stitt wrote: $ pngcrush pngcrush: relocation error: pngcrush: symbol png_iCCP, version PNG12_0 not defined in file libpng12.so.0 with link time reference That would be a bug in libpng12-0... :/ -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#329886: pngcrush broken by new libpng packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 329886 libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-3 Bug#329886: pngcrush broken by new libpng packages Bug reassigned from package `pngcrush' to `libpng12-0'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329889: ethereal: depends on experimental versions of gtk and pango
Paul Wise wrote: Package: ethereal Version: 0.10.12-5 Severity: serious The version of ethereal in unstable depends on libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.8.0) and libpango1.0-0 (= 1.10.0). Both of these are from experimental. to Avoid this in future, please build your packages in a pristine, up to date pbuilder sid chroot, or only upload source packages. As far as I know source-only uploads were not possible. (and a sid chroot needs diskspace I don't have). Rebuilt is on its way. Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329894: strutilsxx: rebuild needed for C++ ABI transition
Package: strutilsxx Version: 0.7.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: cannot provide security support for this package because rebuilds will change the ABI Hi Klaus, The strutilsxx package is a library which exports a C++ ABI, and must therefore undergo a package rename for the g++ 4.0 ABI transition. It has now been several months since gcc 4.0 became the default compiler in the archive; please fix this bug ASAP. Since strutils has no reverse-dependencies in the archive, I do not intend to NMU this package, but will instead ask for its removal from unstable if this bug continues to go unaddressed. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329895: gconf2-common: if there is no /etc/gconf/2, package wants to create /etc/gconf2 and fails.
Package: gconf2-common Version: 2.10.1-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Setting up gconf2-common (2.10.1-3) ... Creating config file /etc/gconf/2/path with new version cp: cannot create regular file `/etc/gconf/2/path': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing gconf2-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gconf2-common ls /etc/gconf/ -F 1/ gconf.xml.defaults/ gconf.xml.mandatory/ schemas/ ls /etc/gconf2 ls: /etc/gconf2: No such file or directory -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11..11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages gconf2-common depends on: ii ucf 2.001 Update Configuration File: preserv gconf2-common recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: Fixed already
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 329711 gconf2 Bug#329711: gconf2-common: installation fails Bug#329724: gconf2-common: fails to install Bug#329789: gconf-common installation error (missing directory) Bug#329797: gconf2-common fails to install if /etc/gconf/2/ is not present Bug reassigned from package `gconf2-common' to `gconf2'. merge 329832 329711 Bug#329711: gconf2-common: installation fails Bug#329832: Installation fails: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/sgml/gconf/gconf-1.0.dtd', which is also in package gconf2 Bug#329724: gconf2-common: fails to install Bug#329789: gconf-common installation error (missing directory) Bug#329797: gconf2-common fails to install if /etc/gconf/2/ is not present Merged 329711 329724 329789 329797 329832. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 316631 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # package is uninstallable, this is a grave bug severity 316631 grave Bug#316631: please rebuild, apt 0.6 reached unstable Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 316629 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # package is uninstallable, this is a grave bug severity 316629 grave Bug#316629: please rebuild, apt 0.6 reached unstable Severity set to `grave'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329897: lirc: setup-driver.sh missing or not found.
Package: lirc Version: 0.7.1pre2-9 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Setting up lirc (0.7.1pre2-9) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/lirc.config: line 576: ./setup-driver.sh: No such file or directory dpkg: error processing lirc (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11..11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages lirc depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii dialog1.0-20050911-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii libasound21.0.9-2ALSA library ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii liblircclient00.7.1pre2-9LIRC client library ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.10a-21 userspace USB programming library lirc recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329889: marked as done (ethereal: depends on experimental versions of gtk and pango)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:32:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329889: fixed in ethereal 0.10.12-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 08:41:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 01:41:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.132] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJ5ba-00053E-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 01:41:58 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE1B11B2C4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:41:25 +0800 (WST) Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vscan02.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01427-09 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:41:25 +0800 (WST) Received: from dsl-202-72-168-241.wa.westnet.com.au (dsl-202-72-168-241.wa.westnet.com.au [202.72.168.241]) by vscan02.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD9111B284 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:41:25 +0800 (WST) Subject: ethereal: depends on experimental versions of gtk and pango From: Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 X-Mutt-Fcc: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-E+o3r7IDnjt7+GQbAKZR Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:41:25 +0800 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --=-E+o3r7IDnjt7+GQbAKZR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: ethereal Version: 0.10.12-5 Severity: serious The version of ethereal in unstable depends on libgtk2.0-0 (=3D 2.8.0) and libpango1.0-0 (=3D 1.10.0). Both of these are from experimental. to Avoid this in future, please build your packages in a pristine, up to date pbuilder sid chroot, or only upload source packages. --=20 bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise --=-E+o3r7IDnjt7+GQbAKZR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDNRE15Sc9mGvjxCMRAmgrAKCBUvVGbCI3GyPMeU5jFVifCGUeFQCgsjlG negO9WN0uTpkdXk0D18106g= =XZmW -END PGP SIGNATURE- --=-E+o3r7IDnjt7+GQbAKZR-- --- Received: (at 329889-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 09:38:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 02:38:15 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJ6O9-0001OB-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:32:09 -0700 From: Frederic Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329889: fixed in ethereal 0.10.12-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:32:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ethereal Source-Version: 0.10.12-6 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ethereal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ethereal-common_0.10.12-6_i386.deb to pool/main/e/ethereal/ethereal-common_0.10.12-6_i386.deb ethereal-dev_0.10.12-6_i386.deb to pool/main/e/ethereal/ethereal-dev_0.10.12-6_i386.deb ethereal_0.10.12-6.diff.gz to pool/main/e/ethereal/ethereal_0.10.12-6.diff.gz ethereal_0.10.12-6.dsc to pool/main/e/ethereal/ethereal_0.10.12-6.dsc ethereal_0.10.12-6_i386.deb to pool/main/e/ethereal/ethereal_0.10.12-6_i386.deb tethereal_0.10.12-6_i386.deb to pool/main/e/ethereal/tethereal_0.10.12-6_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to
Bug#329895: marked as done (gconf2-common: if there is no /etc/gconf/2, package wants to create /etc/gconf2 and fails.)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:43:02 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329895: gconf2-common: if there is no /etc/gconf/2, package wants to create /etc/gconf2 and fails. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 09:28:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 02:28:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (a5web.net) [82.96.75.62] (qmailr) by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJ6Kr-yD-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:28:45 -0700 Received: (qmail 21266 invoked by uid 1005); 24 Sep 2005 09:34:05 - Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by a5web.net by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.15 (. Clear:. Processed in 0.172663 secs); 24 Sep 2005 09:34:05 - Received: from xdsl-213-196-226-113.netcologne.de (HELO jordy.home.net) (213.196.226.113) by 82.96.75.67 with SMTP; 24 Sep 2005 09:34:04 - Received: by jordy.home.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7F38CC6428; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 11:28:39 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Wilfried Goesgens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gconf2-common: if there is no /etc/gconf/2, package wants to create /etc/gconf2 and fails. X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 11:28:39 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gconf2-common Version: 2.10.1-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Setting up gconf2-common (2.10.1-3) ... Creating config file /etc/gconf/2/path with new version cp: cannot create regular file `/etc/gconf/2/path': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing gconf2-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: gconf2-common ls /etc/gconf/ -F 1/ gconf.xml.defaults/ gconf.xml.mandatory/ schemas/ ls /etc/gconf2 ls: /etc/gconf2: No such file or directory -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11..11 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages gconf2-common depends on: ii ucf 2.001 Update Configuration File: preserv gconf2-common recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 329895-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 09:43:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 02:43:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJ6Yg-0003EC-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:43:02 -0700 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 48496704E; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:43:02 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Wilfried Goesgens [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#329895: gconf2-common: if there is no /etc/gconf/2, package wants to create /etc/gconf2 and fails. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:28:39AM +0200, Wilfried Goesgens wrote: Package: gconf2-common Version: 2.10.1-5 That's incorrect. This bug was *fixed* in version 2.10.1-5 of
Bug#329900: cyphesis-cpp: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild for the C++ transition
Package: cyphesis-cpp Version: 0.3.5-2 Severity: grave The cyphesis-cpp package is currently not installable in unstable due to various library transitions: # aptitude install cyphesis-cpp Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed E: Unable to resolve some dependencies! Some packages had unmet dependencies. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following packages have unmet dependencies: cyphesis-cpp: Depends: libsigc++-1.2-5c102 but it is not installable Depends: libvarconf-1.0 but it is not installable Depends: cyphesis-cpp-clients but it is not installable # The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329903: /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules should not be in /etc
Package: libgtk2.0-0 Version: 2.6.8-1 Severity: serious -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 feynman:/etc/gtk-2.0# head /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules # GTK+ Input Method Modules file # Automatically generated file, do not edit # Created by gtk-query-immodules-2.0 from gtk+-2.6.8 That doesn't belong in /etc. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (130, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages libgtk2.0-0 depends on: ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.1-2 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfontconfig12.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.7-2.4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-bin 2.6.8-1The programs for the GTK+ graphica ii libgtk2.0-common 2.6.8-1Common files for the GTK+ graphica ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpango1.0-0 1.8.2-1Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libtiff4 3.7.3-1Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System protocol client li ii libxcursor1 1.1.3-1X cursor management library ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Input extension li ii libxrandr26.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Resize, Rotate and ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime Versions of packages libgtk2.0-0 recommends: ii hicolor-icon-theme0.8-3 default fallback theme for FreeDes - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDNSlu+z+IwlXqWf4RAiUhAJ4nP9+mADaabpsl63Ypc9+8j74EQgCZAYjL rRdJXhuvuOcnVJF/lCBnROQ= =B4Nw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327937: ifrit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
tag 327937 +pending thanks Just to keep the bug and submitter up-to-date, I've sent ifrit 2.9.3-2 to my sponsor so this bug should be fixed soon. Mark -- Mark Hymers [EMAIL PROTECTED] I told you I was ill The epitaph of Spike Milligan (1918-2002) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329881: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 09:10:38PM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: bgoffice Severity: serious Version: 3.0-5 Justification: no longer builds from source bgoffice failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. It also failed on some other buildds. In order to build aspell-bg requires more than 1GB RAM+swap. May be this is what has caused the problem? I hoped this won't be a problem for autobuilders because in its new version aspell-bg has changed its architecture from any to all. If I was wrong I can change aspell-bg to contain a precompiled dictionary hash in its source package. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#327937: ifrit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 327937 +pending Bug#327937: ifrit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags were: sid Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329900: cyphesis-cpp: uninstallable in sid: please rebuild for the C++ transition
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 02:48:50AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: Package: cyphesis-cpp Version: 0.3.5-2 Severity: grave The cyphesis-cpp package is currently not installable in unstable due to various library transitions: # aptitude install cyphesis-cpp Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done Reading task descriptions... Done E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. E: Unable to correct dependencies, some packages cannot be installed E: Unable to resolve some dependencies! Some packages had unmet dependencies. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following packages have unmet dependencies: cyphesis-cpp: Depends: libsigc++-1.2-5c102 but it is not installable Depends: libvarconf-1.0 but it is not installable Depends: cyphesis-cpp-clients but it is not installable # The package should only require a rebuild to fix the problem. Unfortunately not. The version currently in the archive needs an older API version of atlas-cpp. I have prepared a new upstream release of cyphesis-cpp and an older version version of atlas-cpp using a new source package name (atlas-cpp-0.5). I hope to get this sponsored today. then it only needs to get through the NEW queue ... Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329905: pngmeta: Fails to start at all (undefined symbol: png_IEND)
Package: pngmeta Version: 1.11-3 Severity: grave pngmeta refuses to process any PNG file, for example: $ pngmeta /usr/share/pixmaps/splash/gnome-splash.png pngmeta: symbol lookup error: pngmeta: undefined symbol: png_IEND The result is exactly the same without any command line arguments at all: $ pngmeta pngmeta: symbol lookup error: pngmeta: undefined symbol: png_IEND -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages pngmeta depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-3 PNG library - runtime ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime pngmeta recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- Поздрави, Калоян Доганов. ___ Ако не отговарям на писмата Ви: http://6lyokavitza.org/mail
Bug#329906: Unsatisfiable depends in unstable
Package: muine Version: 0.8.3-7 Severity: grave Hi, Muine is currently uninstallable in sid: muine: Depends: libgconf2.0-cil (= 2.3.90) but 1.9.5-2 is to be installed Depends: libglade2.0-cil (= 2.3.90) but 1.9.5-2 is to be installed Depends: libglib2.0-cil (= 2.3.90) but 1.9.5-2 is to be installed Depends: libgnome2.0-cil (= 2.3.90) but 1.9.5-2 is to be installed Depends: libgtk2.0-cil (= 2.3.90) but 1.9.5-2 is to be installed These packages don't appear to be in experimental either. Please upload a fixed package built against unstable. Bye, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 327183, tagging 313384, tagging 314130, tagging 286649, tagging 308038, tagging 313385
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 tags 327183 pending Bug#327183: cyphesis-cpp: FTBFS: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends: libatlas-cpp-0.5-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 313384 pending Bug#313384: INTL:vi Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending tags 314130 pending Bug#314130: cyphesis-cpp: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending tags 286649 pending Bug#286649: cyphesis-cpp: Please change world forge into worldforge in package description There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 308038 pending Bug#308038: [l10n] Czech translation for cyphesis-cpp Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending tags 313385 pending Bug#313385: cyphesis-cpp Tags were: l10n patch Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329838: zinc-compiler: ftbfs [sparc] run.nw:212: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Hi,
I've also did a NMU for this, now using gcc-3.3 to avoid the
gcc-4.0 ICE on sparc (#329840). I've attached the patch of both
of them.
Kurt
diff -u zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog
zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog
--- zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog
+++ zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+zinc-compiler (1.0.2-2.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Build zinc-compiler with gcc-3.3 instead of gcc-4.0 to work around
+the ICE on sparc: #329840. Add a build-depedency on gcc-3.3 and
+let configure use it. (Closes: #329838)
+
+ -- Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:21:25 +0200
+
+zinc-compiler (1.0.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Relink against libgmp3c2, no source changes. (Closes: #327492)
+
+ -- Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:25:40 +0200
+
zinc-compiler (1.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed gcc-4.0 and amd64 compilation problem (closes: Bug#300515).
diff -u zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/control zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/control
--- zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/control
+++ zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: devel
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Nacho Barrientos Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), ghc6 (= 6.2.2-2) | ghc5 (= 5.02.2-1),
nowebm (= 2.9a-7.3)
+Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), ghc6 (= 6.2.2-2) | ghc5 (= 5.02.2-1),
nowebm (= 2.9a-7.3), gcc-3.3
Standards-Version: 3.6.1
Package: zinc-compiler
diff -u zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/rules zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/rules
--- zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/rules
+++ zinc-compiler-1.0.2/debian/rules
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
config.status: configure
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
- CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) ./configure --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
--build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
+ CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) CC=gcc-3.3 ./configure --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
--build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) --prefix=/usr --mandir=\$${prefix}/share/man
--infodir=\$${prefix}/share/info
build: build-stamp
Bug#329454: Fwd: Bug#329454: broken symlinks /usr/bin/boo*
forgot cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forwarded message -- From: H B [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:49:38 +0200 Subject: Re: Bug#329454: broken symlinks /usr/bin/boo* To: Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, thanks for your prompt reaction. If it was just a missing dependency, I'd not filled a grave bug report: debian:~# apt-get -t unstable --reinstall install mono-common boo Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 124 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/895kB of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (Reading database ... 94013 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace boo 0.6.0.1858-1 (using .../boo_0.6.0.1858-1_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement boo ... Preparing to replace mono-common 1.1.8.3-1 (using .../mono-common_1.1.8.3-1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement mono-common ... Setting up boo (0.6.0.1858-1) ... Setting up mono-common (1.1.8.3-1) ... debian:~# which booi /usr/bin/booi debian:~# booi /usr/share/doc/boo/examples/xml.boo debian:~# echo $? 255 debian:~# Perhaps it's problem in mono-common, not boo. Anyhow, if you can think of further tests that would help to isolate the bug, I'd be glad to run them. Greetings HB On 9/22/05, Sam Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: H B wrote: Package: boo Version: 0.6.0.1858-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing boo with apt-get -t unstable install boo the expected executables booi and booc in /usr/bin are just broken symlinks to cli-wrapper which seems to be a file in package mono-common. mono-common isn't listed as a dependency of boo. Installing mono-common didn't seem to render the package useful. booi somefilefrom/usr/share/doc/examples.boo didn't do anything. OK, so mono-common needs to be a dependancy. But aside from that booi seems to be working for me: $ which booi /usr/bin/booi $ booi /usr/share/doc/boo/examples/xml.boo ?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-16? Person xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema; xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance; FirstNameHomer/FirstName LastNameSimpson/LastName Addresses Address StreetAl. Foo/Street Number35/Number /Address Address StreetAl.Bar/Street Number14/Number /Address /Addresses /Person Simpson, Homer 35, Al. Foo 14, Al.Bar What is the output you get from running this? -- sam clegg :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: http://superduper.net/ :: PGP : D91EE369 $superduper: .signature,v 1.14 2005/01/19 13:21:14 sam Exp $
Bug#329912: hmake: Uninstallable, needs rebuild against libgmp3c2
Package: hmake Version: 3.09-3 Severity: grave Hi, Your package currently can't be installed in sid because it still depeneds on libgmp3 and that has been renamed to libgmp3c3 because of the C++ ABI transition. A simple rebuild should take care of this. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of zinc-compiler 1.0.2-2.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 329838 + fixed Bug#329838: zinc-compiler: ftbfs [sparc] run.nw:212: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329905: pngmeta: Fails to start at all (undefined symbol: png_IEND)
reassign 329905 libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-3 merge 329886 329905 thanks On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:49:20PM +0300, Kaloian Doganov wrote: pngmeta refuses to process any PNG file, for example: $ pngmeta /usr/share/pixmaps/splash/gnome-splash.png pngmeta: symbol lookup error: pngmeta: undefined symbol: png_IEND The result is exactly the same without any command line arguments at all: $ pngmeta pngmeta: symbol lookup error: pngmeta: undefined symbol: png_IEND This is an ABI change in libpng12-0; reassigning to that package. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#329905: pngmeta: Fails to start at all (undefined symbol: png_IEND)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 329905 libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-3 Bug#329905: pngmeta: Fails to start at all (undefined symbol: png_IEND) Bug reassigned from package `pngmeta' to `libpng12-0'. merge 329886 329905 Bug#329886: pngcrush broken by new libpng packages Bug#329905: pngmeta: Fails to start at all (undefined symbol: png_IEND) Merged 329886 329905. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329920: xlibmesa-dri: hardware 3D acceleration doesn't work on Voodoo4 (tdfx/glide3) [regression]
Package: xlibmesa-dri Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable - 3D hardware acceleration stopped working. - I tried switching back to the xfree86-server but it doesn't help anymore. - All OpenGL applications now issue these lines (didn't used to happen when 3D hardware acceleration worked) : libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x25 libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x26 libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x29 libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2a libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2d libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x2e libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x31 libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x32 libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x35 libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x36 libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x39 libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x3a libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x3d libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x3e libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x41 libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x42 - `glxgears -info` spins the gears slowly and also adds this information - GL_MAX_VIEWPORT_DIMS=4096/4096 GL_RENDERER = Mesa GLX Indirect GL_VERSION= 1.2 (1.5 Mesa 6.2.1) GL_VENDOR = Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_depth_texture GL_ARB_imaging GL_ARB_multitexture GL_ARB_point_parameters GL_ARB_point_sprite GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_shadow_ambient GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_texture_env_add GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_ARB_window_pos GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_bgra GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_blend_logic_op GL_EXT_blend_minmax GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint GL_EXT_copy_texture GL_EXT_draw_range_elements GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_point_parameters GL_EXT_polygon_offsetGL_EXT_rescale_normal GL_EXT_secondary_color GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_EXT_shadow_funcs GL_EXT_stencil_two_side GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_EXT_subtexture GL_EXT_texture GL_EXT_texture3D GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp GL_EXT_texture_env_add GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3 GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_texture_rectangle GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_APPLE_packed_pixels GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once GL_ATIX_texture_env_combine3 GL_IBM_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_INGR_blend_func_separate GL_MESA_pack_invert GL_MESA_ycbcr_texture GL_NV_blend_square GL_NV_point_sprite GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_NV_texture_rectangle GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_lod GL_SGIX_depth_texture GL_SGIX_shadow GL_SGIX_shadow_ambient GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays 359 frames in 5.0 seconds = 71.800 FPS - more data was collected automatially by 'reportbug' below ... -- Package-specific info: VGA-compatible devices on PCI bus: :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: 3Dfx Interactive, Inc. Voodoo 4 / Voodoo 5 (rev 01) X.Org X server log files on system: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 39607 2005-09-24 15:34 /var/log/Xorg.0.log Contents of most recent X.Org X server log file /var/log/Xorg.0.log: X Window System Version 6.8.2 (Debian 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 20050908031534 David Nusinow [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Release Date: 9 February 2005 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.8.2 Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 i686 [ELF] Current Operating System: Linux boyjon 2.6.10apm #1 Fri Feb 11 00:58:39 IST 2005 i686 Build Date: 08 September 2005 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.X.Org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present OS Kernel: Linux version 2.6.10apm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-5)) #1 Fri Feb 11 00:58:39 IST 2005 Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: /var/log/Xorg.0.log, Time: Sat Sep 24 07:58:04 2005 (==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf (==) ServerLayout XFree86 Configured (**) |--Screen Screen0 (0) (**) | |--Monitor Monitor0 (**) | |--Device Card0 (**) |--Input Device Keyboard0 (**) Option XkbRules xfree86 (**) XKB: rules: xfree86 (**) Option XkbModel pc101 (**) XKB: model: pc101 (**) Option XkbLayout us,il (**) XKB: layout: us,il (**) Option XkbOptions grp:alt_shift_toggle,grp_led:scroll (**) XKB: options: grp:alt_shift_toggle,grp_led:scroll (==) Keyboard: CustomKeycode disabled (**) |--Input Device PS/2 Mouse (**) FontPath set to unix/:7100 (**) RgbPath set to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb (**) ModulePath
Bug#263979: userv: FTBFS: broken debian/rules
Hi, Roger Leigh wrote: Has any progress been made on this RC bug? Considering that we have 3 more or less different proposals for fixing this 1 year old Severity: serious bug, its last day should be coming soon. Additional notes: * I suggest replacing tmp/DEBIAN with ../$t/DEBIAN in the last patch. * Frank's note doesn't apply: Having /bin/bash available and /bin/sh being /bin/bash are different things. bye, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329924: libgnome2-common: Installation fails (postinst) GConf-ERROR **: ...
Package: libgnome2-common Version: 2.10.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** # apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 399 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libgnome2-common (2.10.1-1) ... No such file `/usr/lib/GConf/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so' // Copied /usr/lib/GConf/1 directory as /2 // Then new try: # apt-get -f install Setting up libgnome2-common (2.10.1-1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgnome2-common.postinst: line 7: 15593 Segmentation fault HOME=/root GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule $SCHEMA_LOCATION/$SCHEMA /dev/null dpkg: error processing libgnome2-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgnome2-0: libgnome2-0 depends on libgnome2-common (= 2.10.1-1); however: Package libgnome2-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgnome2-0 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: libgnome2-common libgnome2-0 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) // check for gconftool : # gconftool-2 --get-default-source xml::/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults // My guess, wrong gconftool line. // Missing `` markings for the second gconftool command. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (850, 'testing'), (800, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libgnome2-common depends on: ii gconf22.10.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste libgnome2-common recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325798: marked as done (insserv: makes 2.6 kernel system unbootable and 2.4 system barely usable)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:02:03 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325798: fixed in insserv 1.02.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2005 23:01:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 30 16:01:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from fep16.inet.fi [194.251.242.241] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EAF6n-0007Cn-00; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:01:37 -0700 Received: from route.intranet ([84.249.18.46]) by fep16.inet.fi with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:01:34 +0300 Received: from omena.intranet ([172.16.1.14] ident=q-funk) by route.intranet with smtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EAF7e-0001E3-Jz; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:02:30 +0300 Received: by omena.intranet (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:02:30 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?q?Martin-=C3=89ric_Racine?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Archive: encrypt Subject: insserv: makes 2.6 kernel system unbootable and 2.4 system barely usable X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:02:30 +0300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: insserv Version: 1.00.8-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I copied the two scripts, checked that the boot order in the rc*d directories still made sense, then ran insserv - -v and ended up with a serverely broken system: 1) if booting from a 2.6 kernel, the system repeatedly reboots right at the stage when it should be loading modules selected in /etc/modules. 2) if booting from a 2.4 kernel, it goes all the way to the last boot script, but portmap and libwrap both report being unable to load some SO libraries. In any case, X barely loads, while GNOME gets stuck at its splash screen; meanwhile, a few command line tools work on the virtual console as expected, others don't. I would also like to point out that according to Debian Policy, software that has the potential to render a system unusable must have a priority of extra, not optional. Basically, this package should not have been allowed into unstable and is already of questionable use for Debian at this point, given Debian's extremely limitted LSB support. As such, I demand that it be immediately removed from the archive; if it ever gets reintroduced, it should first go to and be thoroughly tested via experimental. Thanks! PS: this being said, if and when Debian achieves LSB compliance, this package might eventually be safe and even usefull, but this is definitely not the case now, so it must be removed right away. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers stable APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.18-newpmac Locale: LANG=fi_FI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages insserv depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an insserv recommends no packages. - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDFOWGeXr56x4Muc0RAnblAJ9moh4Ju/lLWhRs1pX9nKtUwPKaFQCgoutV UzjQqxyPB/7lb6cWInbvo/M= =WiEy -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 325798-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 13:08:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 06:08:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJ9fH-0002VH-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:02:03 -0700 From: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#325798: fixed in insserv 1.02.0-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:02:03 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Bug#303721: marked as done (plptools: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): using typedef-name 'std::ostream' after 'class')
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:29:22 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303721: fixed in plptools 0.14-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2005 11:33:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 08 04:33:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c203154.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.154] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DJrkL-00037D-00; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 04:33:57 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DJrkJ-00062i-VF; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:33:55 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: plptools: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): using typedef-name 'std::ostream' after 'class' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:33:55 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: plptools Version: 0.12-5 Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'plptools' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: make[2]: Entering directory `/plptools-0.12/lib' /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../intl-D_REENTRANT -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -c bufferarray.cc mkdir .libs c++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../intl -D_REENTRANT -O2 -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -Wp,-MD,.deps/bufferarray.pp -c bufferarray.cc -fPIC -o .libs/bufferarray.o In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux/4.0.0/../../../../include/c++/4.0.0/backward/stream.h:31, from bufferarray.cc:25: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux/4.0.0/../../../../include/c++/4.0.0/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2: warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the X header for the X.h header for C++ includes, or iostream instead of the deprecated header iostream.h. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated. bufferstore.h:132: error: using typedef-name 'std::ostream' after 'class' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux/4.0.0/../../../../include/c++/4.0.0/iosfwd:138: error: 'std::ostream' has a previous declaration here make[2]: *** [bufferarray.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/plptools-0.12/lib' With the attached patch 'plptools' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/plptools-0.12/lib/bufferstore.h ./lib/bufferstore.h --- ../tmp-orig/plptools-0.12/lib/bufferstore.h 2002-07-14 21:07:04.0 +0200 +++ ./lib/bufferstore.h 2005-04-08 12:32:49.030069041 +0200 @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ * * @returns The stream. */ -friend class std::ostream operator(std::ostream , const bufferStore ); +friend std::ostream operator(std::ostream , const bufferStore ); /** * Tests if the bufferStore is empty. diff -urN ../tmp-orig/plptools-0.12/lib/psiprocess.h ./lib/psiprocess.h --- ../tmp-orig/plptools-0.12/lib/psiprocess.h 2002-07-14 21:07:04.0 +0200 +++ ./lib/psiprocess.h 2005-04-08 12:29:07.648242696 +0200 @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ * The output is in human readable similar to the * output of a ls command. */ -friend class std::ostream operator(std::ostream o, const PsiProcess p); +friend std::ostream operator(std::ostream o, const PsiProcess p); private: friend class rpcs; diff -urN ../tmp-orig/plptools-0.12/ncpd/channel.h ./ncpd/channel.h --- ../tmp-orig/plptools-0.12/ncpd/channel.h2002-03-17 00:10:51.0 +0100 +++ ./ncpd/channel.h2005-04-08 12:25:22.196224514 +0200 @@ -45,15 +45,15 @@ void ncpSend(bufferStore a); void setVerbose(short int _verbose); short int getVerbose(); -virtual void ncpDataCallback(bufferStore a) = NULL; -virtual char *getNcpRegisterName() = NULL; +virtual void ncpDataCallback(bufferStore a) = 0; +virtual char *getNcpRegisterName() = 0; void ncpConnect(); void ncpRegister(); void ncpDoRegisterAck(int ch, const char *name); -virtual void ncpConnectAck() = NULL; -virtual void ncpConnectTerminate() = NULL; -virtual
Bug#329924: libgnome2-common: Installation fails (postinst) GConf-ERROR **: ...
Le samedi 24 septembre 2005 à 16:03 +0300, matt a écrit : Package: libgnome2-common Version: 2.10.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** # apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 399 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libgnome2-common (2.10.1-1) ... No such file `/usr/lib/GConf/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so' Did you upgrade gconf2 in the same run? Was a gconfd-2 process owned by root still running? If you kill it, does the upgrade work? // Copied /usr/lib/GConf/1 directory as /2 Why do people keep doing such stupid things? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: severity of 329915 is serious, severity of 329924 is serious, reassign 329924 to gconf2 ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 severity 329915 serious Bug#329915: New gconf2 packages lack /usr/lib/GConf/2/ Severity set to `serious'. severity 329924 serious Bug#329924: libgnome2-common: Installation fails (postinst) GConf-ERROR **: ... Severity set to `serious'. reassign 329924 gconf2 Bug#329924: libgnome2-common: Installation fails (postinst) GConf-ERROR **: ... Bug reassigned from package `libgnome2-common' to `gconf2'. merge 329924 329915 Bug#329915: New gconf2 packages lack /usr/lib/GConf/2/ Bug#329924: libgnome2-common: Installation fails (postinst) GConf-ERROR **: ... Merged 329915 329924. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329929: gucharmap: postinst blows away system immodules configuration
Package: gucharmap Version: 1:1.4.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: Replaces conffile from another package, wiping any customisation The postinst contains this line: # Hopefully GTK+ upstream will do something about this sillyness gtk-query-immodules-2.0 /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules This is rather rude. Wiping out a conffile from another package is not nice. Why is gucharmap doing this? It's no different from any other GTK+ application WRT immodules, and certainly has no business doing this. Regards, Roger -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.1 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages gucharmap depends on: ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libatk1.0-0 1.10.3-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libbonobo2-0 2.10.1-1 Bonobo CORBA interfaces library ii libbonoboui2-02.10.1-1 The Bonobo UI library ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii libgnome2-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 library - runtime file ii libgnomecanvas2-0 2.10.2-2 A powerful object-oriented display ii libgnomeui-0 2.10.1-1 The GNOME 2 libraries (User Interf ii libgnomevfs2-02.10.1-5 The GNOME virtual file-system libr ii libgtk2.0-0 2.6.10-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libgtk2.0-bin 2.6.10-1 The programs for the GTK+ graphica ii libgucharmap4 1:1.4.3-2 Unicode browser widget library (sh ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Inter-Client Exchange library ii liborbit2 1:2.12.2-3 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA ORB ii libpango1.0-0 1.10.0-2 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parameters ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System Session Management ii libxml2 2.6.22-1 GNOME XML library ii scrollkeeper 0.3.14-10 A free electronic cataloging syste ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime gucharmap recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318590: Fixed in upload of curl 7.14.1-1 to experimental
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 the mental interface of Domenico Andreoli told: tag 318590 + fixed-in-experimental It doesn't seem so: dpkg -l | grep curl ii curl 7.14.1-2 ii libcurl3 7.14.1-2 ii libcurl3-gnutls7.14.1-2 ii libcurl3-gnutls-dev7.14.1-2 Building moc depending on libcurl3-gnutls-dev gives dh_shlibdeps debian/moc/usr/bin/mocp: /usr/lib/libcurl.so.3: version `CURL_GNUTLS_3' not found (required by debian/moc/usr/bin/mocp) Why /usr/lib/libcurl.so.3 and not /usr/lib/libcurl-gnutls.so.3? Elimar -- You cannot propel yourself forward by patting yourself on the back. pgp0kfte12IwY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#329239: segfaults? cached headers from previous version?
I just was upgrading mutt-ng and saw your SEGFAULT bug report with no usable description. In my case after upgrade I couldm't start up mutt-ng as well - was segfaultig. Removal of header cache files from previous version helped A LOT -- now it works nicely, so you might want to check if you didn't have orphaned caches of the headers -- .-. =-- /v\ = Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User^^-^^[17] pgp0SEjvsWfPD.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#329881: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 01:25:01PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote: In order to build aspell-bg requires more than 1GB RAM+swap. May be this is what has caused the problem? My pbuilder has 640 MB ram and 1GB swap currently. I can try adding a swap file and seeing if that will let it build. -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With Microsoft, failure is not an option. It is a standard feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329915: New gconf2 packages lack /usr/lib/GConf/2/
Hi, On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 14:49 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Did you upgrade gconf2 in the same run, or at least the same day? Ah... the upgrade I had in my report was not the proper one. The actual one was: 2005-09-23 21:04:41 install gconf2-common none 2.10.1-3 2005-09-23 21:04:42 upgrade gconf2 2.10.1-2 2.10.1-3 2005-09-23 21:05:40 upgrade libgsf-1 1.12.3-3 1.12.3-4 2005-09-23 21:05:40 upgrade libgsf-gnome-1 1.12.3-3 1.12.3-4 But this was aborted (well, suspended and accidentally killed) during the configuration of libgsf-gnome-1, which later caused the failures as reported. Great, you've just broken your system. When something is wrong, you should downgrade instead of trying fscked up solutions. Sorry, I guessed it was just a moved library. I will try to stick to exact science next time :-) So this was most likely due to the interruption of apt-get. Sorry for any confusion and bothering you. Thanks, Remco Schaar signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#319162: marked as done (#319162: gnome-games: ftbfs [sparc] --as-needed is borken in current binutils)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:47:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#319162: fixed in gnome-games 1:2.10.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2005 09:24:25 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 02:24:25 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DvAoT-00054r-00; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:24:25 -0700 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j6K9ONKf030852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:24:23 -0700 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j6K9GC7v009463; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:16:12 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j6K9GCMH009461; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:16:12 -0700 Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:16:12 -0700 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnome-games: ftbfs [sparc] multiple definition of `_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnome-games Version: 1:2.10.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source gnome-games failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on sparc pbuilder: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link cc -g -Wall -O2 -DNO_HOWL -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -o same-gnome drawing.o game.o input.o same-gnome.o ui.o ../libgames-support/libgames-support.la -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lglade-2.0 -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 -lpopt -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lgthread-2.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lrsvg-2 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 ../libgames-support/libgames-support.la mkdir .libs cc -g -Wall -O2 -DNO_HOWL -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -o same-gnome drawing.o game.o input.o same-gnome.o ui.o -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -L/usr/X11R6/lib /usr/lib/libglade-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so -lSM -lICE /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so -lpthread -lz /usr/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.so /usr/lib/libgnome-2.so /usr/lib/libpopt.so /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so /usr/lib/libbonobo-activation.so /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so -lm /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so ../libgames-support/.libs/libgames-support.a /usr/lib/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.0.1/../../../../lib/crt1.o:../sysdeps/sparc/sparc32/elf/start.S:32: multiple definition of `_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_' /usr/bin/ld: Disabling relaxation: it will not work with multiple definitions collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [same-gnome] Error 1 --- Received: (at 319162-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 14:48:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 07:48:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJBIx-0003tz-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:47:07 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#319162: fixed in gnome-games 1:2.10.2-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:47:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329239: segfaults? cached headers from previous version?
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 the mental interface of Yaroslav Halchenko told: I just was upgrading mutt-ng and saw your SEGFAULT bug report with no usable description. In my case after upgrade I couldm't start up mutt-ng Which version did you tried? It would be very helpfull to know wether http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/binary-i386/mutt-ng/mutt-ng_0.0+20050920-1_i386.deb helps or not. Elimar -- Planung: Ersatz des Zufalls durch den Irrtum. -unknown- pgp5PQSqXPlW2.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#329915: New gconf2 packages lack /usr/lib/GConf/2/
Le samedi 24 septembre 2005 à 16:19 +0200, Remco Schaar a écrit : Ah... the upgrade I had in my report was not the proper one. The actual one was: 2005-09-23 21:04:41 install gconf2-common none 2.10.1-3 2005-09-23 21:04:42 upgrade gconf2 2.10.1-2 2.10.1-3 2005-09-23 21:05:40 upgrade libgsf-1 1.12.3-3 1.12.3-4 2005-09-23 21:05:40 upgrade libgsf-gnome-1 1.12.3-3 1.12.3-4 Oh, I didn't notice you upgraded to 2.10.1-3 earlier. This version was seriously broken, so the breakage may simply have gone when you upgraded to 2.10.1-5. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Bug#329924: libgnome2-common: Installation fails (postinst) GConf-ERROR **: ...
On Saturday 24 September 2005 16:49, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le samedi 24 septembre 2005 à 16:03 +0300, matt a écrit : Package: libgnome2-common Version: 2.10.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** # apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 399 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libgnome2-common (2.10.1-1) ... No such file `/usr/lib/GConf/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so' Did you upgrade gconf2 in the same run? Booted system up this morning, with gconfd 2.10.1, then later on upgraded gnome based files as a bunch, with kde did the same thing, first upgraded auxiliary things not related to kde, then big amount of kde core components at the same time, had previously trouble with partial upgrades, so tried to upgrade as much as possible which are related to each other. With kde everything worked, with gnome no. From boot: Sep 24 09:46:39 localhost gconfd (tampio-2886): starting (version 2.10.1), pid 2886 user 'tampio' Sep 24 09:46:40 localhost gconfd (tampio-2886): Resolved address xml:readonly:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.mandatory to a read-only configuration source at position 0 So big bunch of gnome files were updated simultaneously. Was a gconfd-2 process owned by root still running? If you kill it, does the upgrade work? Probably, didn't look at the processes at that time. Nope, it is not running anymore and install won't work. As before Sarge, I'll try to fork dpkg's package list with force commands, then by hand. Seems that the list is not possible to get into working order by normal means, but as soon as I get that latest version changed to working one, I'll try another install and watch processes at that time. // Copied /usr/lib/GConf/1 directory as /2 Why do people keep doing such stupid things? Because couple of days ago, for another package, I fixed same kind of problem with same type of action. After I get this dpkg problem fixed and old versions running, I'll remove that directory, will see if upgrade works any better. Yep, this time I'll try to update them one after another.
Bug#328918: marked as done (hyperestraier: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby')
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328918: fixed in hyperestraier 0.9.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 08:37:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 01:37:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c203233.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.203.233] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EGufi-0004N5-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 01:37:14 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EGufg-0005sD-LG; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 10:37:12 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hyperestraier: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 10:37:12 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: hyperestraier Version: 0.5.7-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'hyperestraier' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: cd rubynative /usr/bin/make make[1]: Entering directory `/hyperestraier-0.5.7/rubynative' ( cd src if ! [ -f Makefile ] ; then ruby extconf.rb ; fi ) /bin/sh: ruby: command not found make[1]: *** [all] Error 127 make[1]: Leaving directory `/hyperestraier-0.5.7/rubynative' make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2 Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'ruby' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/hyperestraier-0.5.7/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/hyperestraier-0.5.7/debian/control 2005-09-18 08:32:41.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-09-18 08:32:39.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: text Priority: optional Maintainer: Fumitoshi UKAI [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, zlib1g-dev, libqdbm-dev (= 1.8.33), libfcgi-dev, ruby1.8, ruby1.8-dev, gcj (= 3:3.2.2-0) [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], libgcj-dev [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], fastjar [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], sablevm [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386] +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, pkg-config, zlib1g-dev, libqdbm-dev (= 1.8.33), libfcgi-dev, ruby, ruby1.8, ruby1.8-dev, gcj (= 3:3.2.2-0) [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], libgcj-dev [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], fastjar [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386], sablevm [!hppa !mips !mipsel !hurd-i386 !kfreebsd-i386] Standards-Version: 3.6.1 Package: hyperestraier --- Received: (at 328918-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 15:48:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 08:48:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJCEz-0001nB-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700 From: Fumitoshi UKAI [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328918: fixed in hyperestraier 0.9.0-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 08:47:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: hyperestraier Source-Version: 0.9.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of hyperestraier, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: hyperestraier_0.9.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/h/hyperestraier/hyperestraier_0.9.0-1.diff.gz hyperestraier_0.9.0-1.dsc to pool/main/h/hyperestraier/hyperestraier_0.9.0-1.dsc hyperestraier_0.9.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hyperestraier/hyperestraier_0.9.0-1_i386.deb hyperestraier_0.9.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/h/hyperestraier/hyperestraier_0.9.0.orig.tar.gz libestraier-dev_0.9.0-1_i386.deb to pool/main/h/hyperestraier/libestraier-dev_0.9.0-1_i386.deb libestraier-java_0.9.0-1_i386.deb to
Bug#329920: xlibmesa-dri: hardware 3D acceleration doesn't work on Voodoo4 (tdfx/glide3) [regression]
severity 329920 important reassign 329920 libglide3 merge 326099 329920 kthxbye On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 15:55 +0300, sagi wrote: Package: xlibmesa-dri Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-7 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable [...] libGL error: can't find Glide library, dlopen(libglide3_h5.so) and dlopen(libglide3.so.3) both failed. libGL error: dlerror() message: /usr/lib/libglide3.so.3: undefined symbol: __LINE__ This is a duplicate of bug #326099 in libglide3, merging. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Bug#329924: libgnome2-common: Installation fails (postinst) GConf-ERROR **: ...
Le samedi 24 septembre 2005 à 18:50 +0300, Vesa Voutilainen a écrit : No such file `/usr/lib/GConf/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so' Did you upgrade gconf2 in the same run? Booted system up this morning, with gconfd 2.10.1 What Debian version? , then later on upgraded gnome based files as a bunch, with kde did the same thing, first upgraded auxiliary things not related to kde, then big amount of kde core components at the same time, had previously trouble with partial upgrades, so tried to upgrade as much as possible which are related to each other. With kde everything worked, with gnome no. Thanks for sending so many details, but things as it doesn't work aren't helpdul. From boot: Sep 24 09:46:39 localhost gconfd (tampio-2886): starting (version 2.10.1), pid 2886 user 'tampio' Sep 24 09:46:40 localhost gconfd (tampio-2886): Resolved address xml:readonly:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.mandatory to a read-only configuration source at position 0 Could you attach the whole gconfd cruft output in your syslog from boot to the moment you sent your bug report? More importantly, I need the dpkg log (/var/log/dpkg.log) of your upgrades. Probably, didn't look at the processes at that time. Nope, it is not running anymore and install won't work. Install won't work? With what error message? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Processed: These bugs make bzflag unusable on net play
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 323815 grave Bug#323815: bzflag: shoots trough other players Severity set to `grave'. severity 324170 grave Bug#324170: bzflag: jitter = -21 problem Severity set to `grave'. severity 324276 grave Bug#324276: bzflag-server: bzflag cannot join the local bzfs server Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329924: libgnome2-common: Installation fails (postinst) GConf-ERROR **: ...
Please, close the bug, following worked and restored libgnome2-0 The idea of upgrading large amount of files with gnome isn't right way apparently. # dpkg --purge --force-all libgnome2-0 dpkg: libgnome2-0: dependency problems, but removing anyway as you request: mozilla-firefox-gnome-support depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libecal6 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libebook8 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). etherape depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). totem-xine depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgnomemm-2.6-1c2 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). anjuta depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgal2.0-6 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). diasce2 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.4.0). libgnomedb2-4 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-about depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-apt depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0); however: Package libgnome2-0 is to be removed. gnome-applets depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-spell depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnomemeeting depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). rep-gtk-gnome depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-system-tools depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gstreamer-player depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.6.1.1). libedataserver3 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgnomedb2-common depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). python2.3-gnome2 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgtkhtml3.0-4 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.4.0). gnome-alsamixer depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-utils depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgnomecupsui1.0-1 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). nautilus depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnumeric depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libswt-gtk3-jni depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.6.1.1). planner depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). glame depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). yelp depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libedataserver1.2-4 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libegroupwise1.2-5 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). file-roller depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-session depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgnomeuimm-2.6-1c2 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libeel2-2 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). bug-buddy depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gcalctool depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-control-center depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-netstatus-applet depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgdkcardimage0 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.6.1.1). gnome-media depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). dia-gnome depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). grip depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-gpg depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-games depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). lavaps depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgnome-desktop-2 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). zapping depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-cups-manager depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). rhythmbox depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libpanel-applet2-0 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libebook1.2-3 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). hardware-monitor depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libecal1.2-2 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-nettool depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgnome2-perl depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0); however: Package libgnome2-0 is to be removed. galeon depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgnomeui-0 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gedit depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-panel depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). rhythmbox-applet depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-system-monitor depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). eog depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). qalculate-gtk depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libgoffice-1 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gdm depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gnome-terminal depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). gstreamer-editor depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). conglomerate depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). libbonoboui2-0 depends on libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0). (Reading database ... 333838 files and directories currently installed.) Removing libgnome2-0 ... Purging configuration files for libgnome2-0 ... # apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common libgnome2-0 libgnomeui-0 libgnomeui-common mozilla-firefox mozilla-firefox-dom-inspector mozilla-firefox-gnome-support The following packages will be REMOVED: libgnomeui-dbg The following NEW packages will be installed: libgnome2-0 The following packages will be upgraded: libbonoboui2-0 libbonoboui2-common libgnomeui-0 libgnomeui-common mozilla-firefox mozilla-firefox-dom-inspector mozilla-firefox-gnome-support 7 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 1 to remove and 392 not upgraded. Need to get 7832kB/9402kB of archives. After unpacking 9478kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Get:1 ftp://ftp.fi.debian.org sid/main mozilla-firefox-gnome-support 1.0.7-1 [53.2kB] Get:2 ftp://ftp.fi.debian.org sid/main mozilla-firefox-dom-inspector 1.0.7-1 [155kB] Get:3
Bug#329835: marked as done (haskelldb: ftbfs [sparc] Could not find module `Database.HSQL.ODBC':)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 09:32:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329835: fixed in haskelldb 0.9.cvs.601-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2005 18:31:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 23 11:31:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EIsKd-0001iT-00; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:31:36 -0700 Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7]) by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j8NIVXnO006678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:31:34 -0700 Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1]) by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8NINvlj005777; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:23:57 -0700 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8NINutd005775; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:23:56 -0700 Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:23:56 -0700 From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: haskelldb: ftbfs [sparc] Could not find module `Database.HSQL.ODBC': Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: haskelldb Version: 0.9.cvs.601-7 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source haskelldb failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc pbuilder. It also failed on other buildds. configure: Dependency hsql=1.4: using hsql-1.6 configure: Dependency base-any: using base-1.0 Running: ./setup build Chasing modules from: Database.HaskellDB,Database.HaskellDB.DriverAPI,Database.HaskellDB.HDBRec,Database.HaskellDB.FieldType,Database.HaskellDB.PrimQuery,Database.HaskellDB.Sql,Database.HaskellDB.Query,Database.HaskellDB.Optimize,Database.HaskellDB.Database,Database.HaskellDB.BoundedString,Database.HaskellDB.BoundedList,Database.HaskellDB.DBSpec,Database.HaskellDB.DBLayout,Database.HaskellDB.DBSpec.DBInfo,Database.HaskellDB.DBSpec.DBSpecToDatabase,Database.HaskellDB.DBSpec.DBSpecToDBDirect,Database.HaskellDB.DBSpec.DatabaseToDBSpec,Database.HaskellDB.DBSpec.PPHelpers,Database.HaskellDB.HSQL.Common,Database.HaskellDB.GenericConnect,Database.HaskellDB.HSQL.ODBC,Database.HaskellDB.HSQL.MySQL,Database.HaskellDB.HSQL.SQLite,Database.HaskellDB.HSQL.PostgreSQL Could not find module `Database.HSQL.ODBC': use -v to see a list of the files searched for (imported from src/Database/HaskellDB/HSQL/ODBC.hs) Preprocessing library haskelldb-0.9... Preprocessing executables for haskelldb-0.9... Building haskelldb-0.9... ./setup build files: 256 at /usr/bin/dh_haskell_buildinst line 167, COMPAT_IN line 1. make: *** [install] Error 9 --- Received: (at 329835-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 16:38:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 09:38:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJCwa-00073A-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 09:32:08 -0700 From: Matej Vela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329835: fixed in haskelldb 0.9.cvs.601-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 09:32:08 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: haskelldb Source-Version: 0.9.cvs.601-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of haskelldb, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: haskelldb-bin_0.9.cvs.601-8_i386.deb to pool/main/h/haskelldb/haskelldb-bin_0.9.cvs.601-8_i386.deb haskelldb_0.9.cvs.601-8.diff.gz to
Bug#329239: segfaults? cached headers from previous version?
In my case after upgrade I couldm't start up mutt-ng Which version did you tried? It would be very helpfull to know wether http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/binary-i386/mutt-ng/mutt-ng_0.0+20050920-1_i386.deb helps or not. My installed version is 0.0+20050831-1. Judging from the mailed changelog I've upgraded from the one before 0.0+20050629-1 But the thing is that as I've reported: I had to remove cache files left from the previous version to have freshly installed one run. That is why at the moment I don't have that cache any more -- it was regenerated by the freshly installed one and it works fine. That is why I can't check if the version you've mentioned helps to resolve the original problem sorry P.S. it seems that there were 3 bugs filed for the same problem and only 1 was closed... -- .-. =-- /v\ = Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User^^-^^[17] pgpY4ZOGfubQu.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#329915: marked as done (New gconf2 packages lack /usr/lib/GConf/2/)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329915: fixed in gconf2 2.10.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 12:31:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 05:31:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from error.fttd-s.tudelft.nl [145.94.154.9] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJ9BK-0007yU-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 05:31:07 -0700 Received: from fault.errorlan (fault [10.36.1.16]) by error.fttd-s.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1503D36886 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:31:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: New gconf2 packages lack /usr/lib/GConf/2/ From: Remco Schaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary==-Nx0FeQ9XHZtkFHSnT4oe Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:31:02 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --=-Nx0FeQ9XHZtkFHSnT4oe Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: gconf2 Version: 2.10.1-5 Hello, I think the new packaging of gconf2 is lacking the libraries in /usr/lib/GConf/2. This is introduced somewhere between 2.10.1-2 and 2.10.1-5. This caused some problems on my system while upgrading libgsf-gnome-1: No such file `/usr/lib/GConf/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so' Failed to load source xml::/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults: Failed: Cou= ldn't locate backend module for `xml::/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults' GConf-ERROR **: file gconftool.c: line 828 (main): assertion failed: (e= rr =3D=3D NULL) aborting... /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgsf-gnome-1.postinst: line 7: 10614 Aborted = HOME=3D/root GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=3D`gconftool-2 --get-default-so= urce` gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule $SCHEMA_LOCATION/$SCHEMA /dev/nu= ll dpkg: error processing libgsf-gnome-1 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 134 This caused libgsf-gnome-1 to fail installing, which rendered a lot of gnome applications unusable, since they could not load their configuration from gconf. Looking at the package contents, gconf2 version 2.10.1-2 contains /usr/lib/GConf/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so which are nowhere in any of the gconf2 packages of 2.10.1-5. However, libgconf2-4 version 2.10.1-5 contains=20 /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so I created a symlink /usr/lib/GConf/2 - /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/2/ which allowed me to upgrade libgsf-gnome-1. Perhaps this symlink should be in one of the gconf2 packages? After upgrading libgsf-gnome-1, that package can be reinstalled again without the symlink present, so this problem may be already be resolved. Perhaps it can still create problems while upgrading though (i.e. etch - sid at the moment)? If non of the above is still considered a problem, this report might be helpful for anyone with a similar upgrade-problem. For the record, I was upgrading libgsf-gnome-1 as follows: 2005-09-15 22:20:22 upgrade libgsf-1 1.12.2-1 1.12.3-3 according my dpkg.log. HTH, Remco Schaar -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=3Den_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages gconf2 depends on: ii gconf2-common 2.10.1-5 GNOME configuration database s= yste ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared librarie= s an ii libgconf2-4 2.10.1-5 GNOME configuration database s= yste ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.0-1The GLib library of C routines ii liborbit2 1:2.12.2-3 libraries for ORBit2 - a CORBA= ORB ii libpopt0 1.7-5 lib for parsing cmdline parame= ters ii libxml2 2.6.22-1 GNOME XML library ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library -
Bug#329924: marked as done (libgnome2-common: Installation fails (postinst) GConf-ERROR **: ...)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329915: fixed in gconf2 2.10.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 13:04:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 06:04:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mbox2.netikka.net [213.250.81.203] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJ9hO-0003mf-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 06:04:14 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mbox2-scanned.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAF9408035 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:03:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (r195.ip5.netikka.fi [85.157.121.195]) by mbox2.netikka.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A1A8408035 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:03:41 +0300 (EEST) From: matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libgnome2-common: Installation fails (postinst) GConf-ERROR **: ... Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:03:40 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libgnome2-common Version: 2.10.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable *** Please type your report below this line *** # apt-get -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 399 not upgraded. 2 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up libgnome2-common (2.10.1-1) ... No such file `/usr/lib/GConf/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so' // Copied /usr/lib/GConf/1 directory as /2 // Then new try: # apt-get -f install Setting up libgnome2-common (2.10.1-1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgnome2-common.postinst: line 7: 15593 Segmentation fault HOME=/root GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule $SCHEMA_LOCATION/$SCHEMA /dev/null dpkg: error processing libgnome2-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libgnome2-0: libgnome2-0 depends on libgnome2-common (= 2.10.1-1); however: Package libgnome2-common is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libgnome2-0 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: libgnome2-common libgnome2-0 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) // check for gconftool : # gconftool-2 --get-default-source xml::/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults // My guess, wrong gconftool line. // Missing `` markings for the second gconftool command. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (850, 'testing'), (800, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages libgnome2-common depends on: ii gconf22.10.1-5 GNOME configuration database syste libgnome2-common recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 329915-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 17:19:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 10:19:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJDe6-0002sb-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:17:06 -0700 From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329915: fixed in gconf2 2.10.1-6 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:17:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #14619 (project findutils): Hello, Afaict almost any usage of -perm +'symbolic mode' is broken in .25. (Checked e.g. u+x g=w u+w,g+r). Contrary to my initial claim 4.2.(21-24) is _not_ ok, though, -perm +smbolic mode has lots of false positives, e.g -perm +u+x matches 455, 472, 621 and 417. (Afaict it matches everything with _any_ execute bit set.) cu andreas ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=14619 ___ Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#325294: marked as done (gnuboy: FTBFS: Please change Build-Depends from 'aa1lib-dev' to 'libaa1-dev')
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:32:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#325294: fixed in gnuboy 1.0.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2005 12:01:22 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 27 05:01:22 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from d009030.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.9.30] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E8zNB-0006jh-00; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 05:01:21 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8zN9-0003Sf-66; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:01:19 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: gnuboy: FTBFS: Please change Build-Depends from 'aa1lib-dev' to 'libaa1-dev' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:01:19 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: gnuboy Version: 1.0.3-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'gnuboy' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: Package aalib1-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source However the following packages replace it: libaa1-dev E: Package aalib1-dev has no installation candidate E: Failed to satisfy Build-Depends dependency for gnuboy: aalib1-dev Please change the Build-Depends from 'aa1lib-dev' to 'libaa1-dev' in debian/control. Please also Build-Depend on 'libslang2-dev' instead of 'slang1-dev'. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gnuboy-1.0.3/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/gnuboy-1.0.3/debian/control 2005-08-27 11:51:32.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-08-27 11:51:21.0 + @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: contrib/games Priority: optional Maintainer: Davide Puricelli (evo) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: xutils, debhelper, svgalibg1-dev [i386], xlibs-dev, libsdl1.2-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libggi2-dev, libgii0-dev, aalib1-dev, libesd0-dev, slang1-dev, libncurses5-dev +Build-Depends: xutils, debhelper, svgalibg1-dev [i386], xlibs-dev, libsdl1.2-dev, libaudiofile-dev, libggi2-dev, libgii0-dev, libaa1-dev, libesd0-dev, libslang2-dev, libncurses5-dev Standards-Version: 3.5.2 Package: gnuboy-sdl --- Received: (at 325294-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 17:39:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 10:39:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJDsd-0005vd-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:32:07 -0700 From: Davide Puricelli (evo) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#325294: fixed in gnuboy 1.0.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:32:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: gnuboy Source-Version: 1.0.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gnuboy, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gnuboy-sdl_1.0.3-2_i386.deb to pool/contrib/g/gnuboy/gnuboy-sdl_1.0.3-2_i386.deb gnuboy-svga_1.0.3-2_i386.deb to pool/contrib/g/gnuboy/gnuboy-svga_1.0.3-2_i386.deb gnuboy-x_1.0.3-2_i386.deb to pool/contrib/g/gnuboy/gnuboy-x_1.0.3-2_i386.deb gnuboy_1.0.3-2.diff.gz to pool/contrib/g/gnuboy/gnuboy_1.0.3-2.diff.gz gnuboy_1.0.3-2.dsc to pool/contrib/g/gnuboy/gnuboy_1.0.3-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Davide Puricelli (evo) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gnuboy package) (This
Bug#329239: segfaults? cached headers from previous version?
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 the mental interface of Yaroslav Halchenko told: In my case after upgrade I couldm't start up mutt-ng Which version did you tried? It would be very helpfull to know wether http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/binary-i386/mutt-ng/mutt-ng_0.0+20050920-1_i386.deb helps or not. My installed version is 0.0+20050831-1. Judging from the mailed changelog I've upgraded from the one before 0.0+20050629-1 ^^ This is a known issue. Reading UPGRADING will lighten you: ... 2005-07-28: Because of reverting a (overly eager) mutt-ng-specific issue with header caching, starting with revision 362, all caches must be removed and rebuild again. Sorry for that. ... So I think closing the sig-bugs will be acceptable. Elimar -- Talking much about oneself can also be a means to conceal oneself. -Friedrich Nietzsche pgpIfitsX9Ql0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: closing 329238 329239
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 329238 Bug#329238: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox from sidebar 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug#329239: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox Bug closed, send any further explanations to Arias [EMAIL PROTECTED] close 329239 Bug#329239: mutt-ng segfaults when attempting to open mailbox 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug is already closed, cannot re-close. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329881: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error
clone 329881 -1 reassign -1 aspell retitle -1 aspell munch-list fails on some architectures severity -1 normal submitter -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Since this aspell munch-list command is quiet CPU+memory intensive for the sake of the autobuilders I am going to fix this bug by including precompiled dictionary hash in the souce package (as the other aspell-* packages do). However there is still some bug in aspell so I have created a small package to reproduce the bug. Get it from http://lml.bas.bg/~anton/misc/aspell-munch-bug.tar.bz2 Run the command ./command in it. Notice that although it refers to the locale bg_BG it is not important to have this locale compiled in the system. I am reassigning a clone of this bug to aspell. However I have not been able to reproduce it using the prepared small package because I don't have access to non-i386 machine. Acording to buildd logs the bug manifests on the following platforms: arm, hppa, ia64, mipsel, powerpc, s390 and sparc. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#329881: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 329881 -1 Bug#329881: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error Bug 329881 cloned as bug 329954. reassign -1 aspell Bug#329954: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error Bug reassigned from package `bgoffice' to `aspell'. retitle -1 aspell munch-list fails on some architectures Bug#329954: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error Changed Bug title. severity -1 normal Bug#329954: aspell munch-list fails on some architectures Severity set to `normal'. submitter -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#329954: aspell munch-list fails on some architectures Changed Bug submitter from Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329963: callgrind: Uninstallable in sid, requires older valgrind
Package: valgrind-callgrind Version: 0.9.12-1 Severity: serious Tags: sid Hi, Your package is currently uninstallable in sid because it conflicts with valgrind ( 1:2.6) and 1:3.0.1-1 is in sid. It also can not be build for the same reason. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329239: segfaults? cached headers from previous version?
So I think closing the sig-bugs will be acceptable. Go for it! :-) -- .-. =-- /v\ = Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User^^-^^[17] pgpfuhO7G88So.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#327937: marked as done (ifrit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:47:43 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327937: fixed in ifrit 2.9.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:47:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:47:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy1d-0003SE-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:47:49 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1a-0002S0-9h for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ifrit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:46 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: ifrit Version: 2.9.3-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327937-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 20:52:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 13:52:18 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJGvv-0002lt-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:47:43 -0700 From: Mark Hymers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327937: fixed in ifrit 2.9.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:47:43 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: ifrit Source-Version: 2.9.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ifrit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ifrit_2.9.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/i/ifrit/ifrit_2.9.3-2.diff.gz ifrit_2.9.3-2.dsc to pool/main/i/ifrit/ifrit_2.9.3-2.dsc ifrit_2.9.3-2_i386.deb to pool/main/i/ifrit/ifrit_2.9.3-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes
Bug#329881: marked as done (bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:47:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329881: fixed in bgoffice 3.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 04:14:32 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 23 21:14:32 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJ1Ql-0005wM-00; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:14:31 -0700
Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
j8O4EDlf025849
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:14:14 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8O4Acr3014980;
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:10:38 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8O4Acq3014978;
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:10:38 -0700
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 21:10:38 -0700
From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bgoffice: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: bgoffice
Severity: serious
Version: 3.0-5
Justification: no longer builds from source
bgoffice failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder. It also failed on some other buildds.
cd bin/build_dictionaries ./build_OOo.sh
awk '{ \
if($1 == SET) \
print SET cp1251; \
else if ($1 == SFX $5 == . $3 != 0) { \
print $1, $2, $3, $4, $3; \
} else { \
print; \
} \
}' bin/build_dictionaries/bg_BG.aff debian/bg_affix.dat
awk '{ \
if($1 == SET) \
print SET microsoft-cp1251; \
else \
print; \
}' bin/build_dictionaries/bg_BG.aff debian/bg_BG.aff
LANG=bg_BG aspell munch-list --dict-dir=debian/
bin/build_dictionaries/bg_words.dat debian/bg.wl
/bin/sh: line 1: 21600 Bus error LANG=bg_BG aspell munch-list
--dict-dir=debian/ bin/build_dictionaries/bg_words.dat debian/bg.wl
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 138
---
Received: (at 329881-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 20:51:50 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 13:51:50 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJGvM-0002Xc-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:47:08 -0700
From: Anton Zinoviev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#329881: fixed in bgoffice 3.0-6
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 13:47:08 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: bgoffice
Source-Version: 3.0-6
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
bgoffice, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
aspell-bg_3.0-6_all.deb
to pool/main/b/bgoffice/aspell-bg_3.0-6_all.deb
bgoffice_3.0-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/bgoffice/bgoffice_3.0-6.diff.gz
bgoffice_3.0-6.dsc
to pool/main/b/bgoffice/bgoffice_3.0-6.dsc
ibulgarian_3.0-6_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/bgoffice/ibulgarian_3.0-6_i386.deb
myspell-bg_3.0-6_all.deb
to pool/main/b/bgoffice/myspell-bg_3.0-6_all.deb
wbulgarian_3.0-6_all.deb
to pool/main/b/bgoffice/wbulgarian_3.0-6_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anton Zinoviev
Bug#329929: gucharmap: postinst blows away system immodules configuration
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 03:18:23PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: Package: gucharmap Version: 1:1.4.3-2 Severity: serious Justification: Replaces conffile from another package, wiping any customisation The postinst contains this line: # Hopefully GTK+ upstream will do something about this sillyness gtk-query-immodules-2.0 /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules This is rather rude. Wiping out a conffile from another package is not nice. A conffile from *what* package? $ dpkg -S /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules dpkg: /etc/gtk-2.0/gtk.immodules not found. $ -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#325665: hostap-source: Can not build driver for 2.6.12-1-k7
Hi! I cannot reproduce this failure. hostap-source builds fine with m-a on my system. Perhaps submitter have no configured kernel source installed, so the link /lib/module/2.6.12-1-k7/build/ - /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.12 points to nothing or he removed the .config for some reasons? Severity could be decreased, because grave is not suitable here. I would say normal or important maximaly. Kindly regards, Erik -- www.ErikSchanze.de * Bitte keine HTML-E-Mails! No HTML mails, please! Limit: 100 kB * * Linux-Info-Tag in Dresden, am 29. Oktober 2005 * Info: http://www.linux-info-tag.de * pgpt9VpVMcaDG.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#322448: marked as done (libapache-request-perl: Apache::Request fails with unresolved dynamic load)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:47:14 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322448: fixed in libapache-request-perl 1.33-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 17:35:00 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 10:35:00 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from adsl-71-128-90-172.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net (gghcwest.com)
[71.128.90.172]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2uTk-0004v6-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:35:00 -0700
Received: from h001.gghcwest.com (h001.gghcwest.com [192.168.168.142])
by gghcwest.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j7AHYQmd026965;
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:34:26 -0700
Received: from jwb by h001.gghcwest.com with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1E2uTC-0003vc-QM; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:34:27 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeffrey W. Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libapache-request-perl: Apache::Request fails with unresolved dynamic
load
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:34:26 -0700
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: libapache-request-perl
Version: 1.1-0.1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
The package is unusable because it is linked incorrectly. The error
message is:
Can't load '/usr/lib/perl5/auto/Apache/Request/Request.so' for module
Apache::Request: libapreq.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
file or directory at /usr/lib/perl/5.8/DynaLoader.pm line 225.\n at
/usr/lib/perl5/mod_perl.pm line 14
Here is a patch:
Index: Cookie/Makefile.PL
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-apreq/Cookie/Makefile.PL,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 Makefile.PL
--- Cookie/Makefile.PL 3 Apr 2001 19:24:08 - 1.5
+++ Cookie/Makefile.PL 31 Jul 2003 11:31:06 -
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
@mm_args,
'INC' = -I../c . $src-inc,
'TYPEMAPS' = $src-typemaps,
-'LIBS' = -L$root -lapreq,
+'OBJECT' = Cookie.o $root/libapreq.a,
'dynamic_lib' = {
'OTHERLDFLAGS' = $src-otherldflags,
},
Index: Request/Makefile.PL
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-apreq/Request/Makefile.PL,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 Makefile.PL
--- Request/Makefile.PL 3 Apr 2001 19:24:09 - 1.5
+++ Request/Makefile.PL 31 Jul 2003 11:31:06 -
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
@mm_args,
'INC' = -I../c . $src-inc,
'TYPEMAPS' = $src-typemaps,
- 'LIBS' = -L$root -lapreq,
+ 'OBJECT' = Request.o $root/libapreq.a,
'dynamic_lib' = {
'OTHERLDFLAGS' = $src-otherldflags,
},
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-SLES9_SP1_BRANCH_200414454891_lustre.1.4.0smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages libapache-request-perl depends on:
ii libapache-mod-perl1.29.0.3-7 integration of perl with the Apach
ii perl 5.8.7-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.7] 5.8.7-4The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
libapache-request-perl recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 322448-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 21:48:17 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 14:48:17 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EJHrW-0005QW-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:47:14 -0700
From: Ivan Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#322448: fixed in libapache-request-perl 1.33-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:47:14 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version:
Bug#328069: marked as done (oprofile-common: Conflicts with old oprofile)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:17:17 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#328069: fixed in oprofile 0.9.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 09:24:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 02:24:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk [80.71.3.114] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EF71i-Wa-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 02:24:30 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1567A067; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:24:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kerouac [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21886-05; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:24:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [212.50.174.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDE57A066; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:24:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from broonie by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EF726-0003pc-8E; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:24:54 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: oprofile-common: Conflicts with old oprofile X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:24:54 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at projectcolo.org.uk Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: oprofile Version: 0.9.1-3 Severity: serious Both oprofile-common and oprofile-gui conflict with older versions of the oprofile package: Unpacking oprofile-common (from .../oprofile-common_0.9.1-3_powerpc.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/oprofile-common_0.9.1-3_powerpc.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/opannotate', which is also in package oprofile dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Selecting previously deselected package oprofile-gui. Unpacking oprofile-gui (from .../oprofile-gui_0.9.1-3_powerpc.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/oprofile-gui_0.9.1-3_powerpc.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/bin/oprof_start', which is also in package oprofile dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) They should probably conflict with and replace these old versions. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-powerpc Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 328069-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 00:18:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 17:18:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJKCj-0007Tj-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:17:17 -0700 From: Al Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#328069: fixed in oprofile 0.9.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 17:17:17 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: oprofile Source-Version: 0.9.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of oprofile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: oprofile-common_0.9.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/o/oprofile/oprofile-common_0.9.1-4_i386.deb oprofile-gui_0.9.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/o/oprofile/oprofile-gui_0.9.1-4_i386.deb oprofile-source_0.9.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/o/oprofile/oprofile-source_0.9.1-4_i386.deb
Bug#264445: marked as done (tzc: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:02:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#264445: fixed in tzc 2.6.15-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 22:07:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 15:07:53 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BtvpZ-0004vo-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:07:53 -0700 Received: from c156167.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost) [213.39.156.167] by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BtvpY-0001jT-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:07:53 -0600 Received: from aj by localhost with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BtvpX-0007b7-4y; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:07:51 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tzc: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 00:07:51 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: tzc Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'tzc' with gcc-3.4 I get the following error: make[1]: Entering directory `/tzc-2.6.15' gcc -g -O -Wall -DINTERREALM -c -o tzc.o tzc.c tzc.c: In function `list_subs': tzc.c:409: warning: implicit declaration of function `ZGetSubscriptions' tzc.c: In function `handle_set_location': tzc.c:1175: error: label at end of compound statement tzc.c: In function `setup': tzc.c:1349: warning: passing arg 1 of `set_com_err_hook' from incompatible pointer type make[1]: *** [tzc.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tzc-2.6.15' With the attached patch 'tzc' can be compiled using gcc-3.4. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/tzc-2.6.15/tzc.c ./tzc.c --- ../tmp-orig/tzc-2.6.15/tzc.c2004-08-09 00:05:33.040001157 +0200 +++ ./tzc.c 2004-08-09 00:05:26.434268611 +0200 @@ -1172,6 +1172,7 @@ fail: /* nothing to do */ + return; } --- Received: (at 264445-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 01:08:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 18:08:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJKuA-0006Mr-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:02:10 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Theodore Y. Ts'o) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#264445: fixed in tzc 2.6.15-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:02:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: tzc Source-Version: 2.6.15-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tzc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tzc_2.6.15-5.diff.gz to pool/main/t/tzc/tzc_2.6.15-5.diff.gz tzc_2.6.15-5.dsc to pool/main/t/tzc/tzc_2.6.15-5.dsc tzc_2.6.15-5_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tzc/tzc_2.6.15-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Theodore Y. Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated tzc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 20:46:29 -0400 Source: tzc Binary: tzc Architecture: source i386 Version: 2.6.15-5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Theodore Y. Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Theodore Y. Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: tzc- Trivial Zephyr Client Closes: 264445 Changes: tzc (2.6.15-5) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix
Bug#329888: [parisc-linux] binutils breaks hppa kernel build,
binutils-2.15 has this in include/opcodes/hppa.h:
{ fdc,0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, cZx(s,b), pa10, 0},
{ fdc,0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, cZx(b), pa10, 0},
{ fic,0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, cZx(S,b), pa10, 0},
{ fic,0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, cZx(b), pa10, 0},
The last fic opcode entry is wrong. It's using the wrong
instruction format, the mask is wrong, pa10 is wrong, etc.
And the binutils_2.16.1cvs20050902 version has only:
{ fdc,0x04001280, 0xfc00ffdf, cZx(b), pa10, 0},
{ fdc,0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, cZx(s,b), pa10, 0},
{ fic,0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, cZx(S,b), pa10, 0},
Yes, I deleted the entry because there isn't implicit space
register selection for 'S' instructions.
The order of the with 's' vs without 's' was switched and
in the process dropped one fic line.
Changing the order of with 's' vs without 's' was intentional.
It generates better disassembly. Give the new objdump a try
and you will see the difference.
Can binutils maintainer/folks please just add it back
in the new location?
We need a new pa20 format 24 entry.
Is the fix obvious enough or is a patch necessary?
A patch is needed.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327334: marked as done (libqscintilla6: should conflict with libqscintilla5)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:32:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327334: fixed in qscintilla 1.6-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 08:21:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 09 01:21:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vscan03.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.142] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EDe8x-0005PX-00; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 01:21:55 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40367B600D8; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 16:21:24 +0800 (WST) Received: from vscan03.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vscan03.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11943-03-2; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 16:21:24 +0800 (WST) Received: from localhost (dsl-202-173-183-137.vic.westnet.com.au [202.173.183.137]) by vscan03.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A9DB601D7; Fri, 9 Sep 2005 16:21:20 +0800 (WST) Received: from bab by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1EDe9A-0006yg-00; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:22:08 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libqscintilla6: should conflict with libqscintilla5 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:22:08 +1000 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Ben Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libqscintilla6 Version: 1.6-1 Severity: serious Hi, Both libqscintilla5 and libqscintilla6 ship the file: /usr/lib/qt3/plugins/designer/libqscintillaplugin.so However, libqscintilla6 contains no conflict with libqscintilla5. As a result, the system will happily try to install them together until the files clash (at which point the installation breaks with an error). Ben. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libqscintilla6 depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-6 GCC support library ii libqt3-mt 3:3.3.4-7 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libstdc++64.0.1-6The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m libqscintilla6 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 327334-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 01:38:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 18:38:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJLN8-0006K4-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:32:06 -0700 From: Ricardo Javier Cardenes Medina [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327334: fixed in qscintilla 1.6-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:32:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: qscintilla Source-Version: 1.6-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of qscintilla, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libqscintilla-dev_1.6-2_all.deb to pool/main/q/qscintilla/libqscintilla-dev_1.6-2_all.deb libqscintilla-doc_1.6-2_all.deb to pool/main/q/qscintilla/libqscintilla-doc_1.6-2_all.deb libqscintilla6_1.6-2_i386.deb to
Bug#329888: [parisc-linux] binutils breaks hppa kernel build,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:27:22PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: The last fic opcode entry is wrong. It's using the wrong instruction format, the mask is wrong, pa10 is wrong, etc. I don't think we realised this until now. I suspect we've been silently emitting bad code up until this point, and given that it's in flush_kernel_icache_page, maybe it explains some of our occasional crashes. The code was previously: fic,m %r23(%r26) We're trying to flush kernel space at this point, so we can use any of sr4-sr7. I suspect before we were putting sr0 in, which could have been flushing any random space instead of the one we wanted. I'll commit this change to the kernel source now. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327272: libpam-modules: pam_issue.so causes double free or corruption error in glibc
Hi Pierfrancesco, On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 11:30:53PM +0200, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote: Hello, I just had the nasty surprise of not being able to login at the console anymore with the following error: penny login: myusername *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x08063f28 *** I have been completely unable to reproduce this bug on my system. Can you forward the contents of your /etc/issue to the BTS? Perhaps it's somehow specific to the length of the file. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329888: [parisc-linux] binutils breaks hppa kernel build,
binutils-2.15 has this in include/opcodes/hppa.h:
{ fdc,0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, cZx(s,b), pa10, 0},
{ fdc,0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, cZx(b), pa10, 0},
{ fic,0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, cZx(S,b), pa10, 0},
{ fic,0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, cZx(b), pa10, 0},
The last fic opcode entry is wrong. It's using the wrong
instruction format, the mask is wrong, pa10 is wrong, etc.
The enclosed patch against binutils head adds the missing fic
entry. I also noticed that we were missing a pa20 im5 variant for
fdc. This builds and checks with no regressions. However,
the new entries aren't really tested.
Dave
--
J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602)
Index: hppa.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/include/opcode/hppa.h,v
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -3 -p -r1.59 hppa.h
--- hppa.h 3 Aug 2005 15:08:52 - 1.59
+++ hppa.h 25 Sep 2005 01:58:35 -
@@ -755,6 +755,9 @@ static const struct pa_opcode pa_opcodes
{ pdc, 0x04001380, 0xfc003fdf, cZx(s,b), pa10, 0},
{ fdc, 0x04001280, 0xfc00ffdf, cZx(b), pa10, 0},
{ fdc, 0x04001280, 0xfc003fdf, cZx(s,b), pa10, 0},
+{ fdc, 0x04003280, 0xfc00, 5(b), pa20, FLAG_STRICT},
+{ fdc, 0x04003280, 0xfc003fff, 5(s,b), pa20, FLAG_STRICT},
+{ fic, 0x040013c0, 0xfc00dfdf, cZx(b), pa20, FLAG_STRICT},
{ fic, 0x04000280, 0xfc001fdf, cZx(S,b), pa10, 0},
{ fdce, 0x040012c0, 0xfc00ffdf, cZx(b), pa10, 0},
{ fdce, 0x040012c0, 0xfc003fdf, cZx(s,b), pa10, 0},
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 327272, severity of 327272 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 tags 327272 unreproducible moreinfo Bug#327272: libpam-modules: pam_issue.so causes double free or corruption error in glibc There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo severity 327272 important Bug#327272: libpam-modules: pam_issue.so causes double free or corruption error in glibc Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Changing severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329246 grave Bug#329246: mondoarchive failing when booting in compare mode Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329994: base-installer: lilo-installer fails because vmlinuz symlink is not in /
Package: base-installer Version: 1.24 Severity: serious In commit r29833 the value of link_in_boot was changed from false to true for i386 and amd64. This change make lilo-installer fail as lilo.conf is configured to expect symlinks for the kernel and initrd in / (if boot is not a separate partition). The changelog entry for this change (release 1.24) is: * Turn link_in_boot on for both i386 and amd64. They should be the same, and Kamion points out turning it off for amd64 is a regression. pgpEN5cdOh6ci.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#329888: [parisc-linux] binutils breaks hppa kernel build,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:27:22PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: The last fic opcode entry is wrong. It's using the wrong instruction format, the mask is wrong, pa10 is wrong, etc. I don't think we realised this until now. I suspect we've been silently emitting bad code up until this point, and given that it's in flush_kernel_icache_page, maybe it explains some of our occasional crashes. The code was previously: fic,m %r23(%r26) I've committed a fix to binutils head. The above should now be accepted when generating PA 2.0 code. However, I'd probably avoid using this feature for awhile. It looks like the bug has been present since ~ 1996. Dave -- J. David Anglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6602) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Britney doesn't appear to support versioning yet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 327711 +sid Bug#327711: uim-xim crashes at startup: Segmentation fault Tags were: pending fixed-upstream Tags added: sid tags 327711 +sarge Bug#327711: uim-xim crashes at startup: Segmentation fault Tags were: sid pending fixed-upstream Tags added: sarge Thankyou Mr Bug Control Robot Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329888: [parisc-linux] binutils breaks hppa kernel build,
On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 11:24:31PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:27:22PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: The last fic opcode entry is wrong. It's using the wrong instruction format, the mask is wrong, pa10 is wrong, etc. I don't think we realised this until now. I suspect we've been silently emitting bad code up until this point, and given that it's in flush_kernel_icache_page, maybe it explains some of our occasional crashes. The code was previously: fic,m %r23(%r26) I've committed a fix to binutils head. The above should now be accepted when generating PA 2.0 code. However, I'd probably avoid using this feature for awhile. It looks like the bug has been present since ~ 1996. This is in a file that's used on pa1.1 processors too, so I've gone with specifying sr4 explicitly. Thanks for fixing this bug and exposing our bug ... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed: Britney doesn't appear to support versioning yet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 327711 -sid sarge Bug#327711: uim-xim crashes at startup: Segmentation fault Tags were: sarge sid pending fixed-upstream Tags removed: sid, sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: please recompile kino plugins
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 326801 -1 -2 -3 Bug#326801: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes Bug 326801 cloned as bugs 329998-33. severity -1 serious Bug#329998: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes Severity set to `serious'. severity -2 serious Bug#32: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes Severity set to `serious'. severity -3 serious Bug#33: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes Severity set to `serious'. reassign -1 kinoplus Bug#329998: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes Bug reassigned from package `kino' to `kinoplus'. reassign -2 kino-dvtitler Bug#32: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes Bug reassigned from package `kino' to `kino-dvtitler'. reassign -3 kino-timfx Bug#33: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes Bug reassigned from package `kino' to `kino-timfx'. retitle -1 kinoplus: please rebuild against g++-4.0 Bug#329998: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes Changed Bug title. retitle -2 kino-dvtitler: please rebuild against g++-4.0 Bug#32: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes Changed Bug title. retitle -3 kino-timfx: please rebuild against g++-4.0 Bug#33: kino: Plugins are missing options; frequent crashes Changed Bug title. thanks, piem Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330003: kernel-source-2.4.27/kernel-source-2.4.27-11
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27-11 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I can successfully apt-get the kernel-source-2.4.27 package using testing, but when trying to bunzip it bunzip2 gives a Data Integrity Error while decompressing -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Bug#330005: sctplib_1:1.0.4-1: FTBFS: 'union sockunion' has no member named 'sin6'
Package: sctplib Severity: serious Version: 1:1.0.4-1 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of sctplib_1:1.0.4-1 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 65 Build started at 20050925-0608 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libglib1.2-dev, bzip2 [...] adaptation.c: In function 'adl_gatherLocalAddresses': adaptation.c:3214: error: 'union sockunion' has no member named 'sin6' Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=sctplibver=1%3A1.0.4-1arch=alphastamp=1127621351file=logas=raw Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#330000: kino-timfx: please rebuild against g++-4.0
retitle kino-timfx: crashes kino thanks On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 09:30:27PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: and some of the plugins crash badly indeed. it seems that kino-dvtitler, kinoplus and kino-timfx need a rebuild. they still depend on libstdc++5. Hrm? oops, sorry. Package: kino-timfx Priority: extra Section: graphics Installed-Size: 192 Maintainer: Roland Mas [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: i386 Source: timfx Version: 0.2.2-3 Depends: libart-2.0-2 (= 2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (= 1.9.0), libbonobo2-0 (= 2.8.0), libbonoboui2-0 (= 2.5.4), libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libgcc1 (= 1:4.0.1), libgconf2-4 (= 2.9), libglib2.0-0 (= 2.6.0), libglibmm-2.4-1c2 (= 2.6.1), libgnome2-0 (= 2.8.0), libgnomecanvas2-0 (= 2.6.0), libgnomeui-0 (= 2.8.0), libgnomevfs2-0 (= 2.10.0-0), libgtk2.0-0 (= 2.6.0), libgtkmm-2.4-1c2 (= 1:2.6.0), libice6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), liborbit2 (= 1:2.10.0), libpango1.0-0 (= 1.8.1), libpopt0 (= 1.7), libsigc++-2.0-0c2 (= 2.0.2), libsm6 | xlibs ( 4.1.0), libstdc++6 (= 4.0.1), libxml2 (= 2.6.20), xlibmesa-gl | libgl1, zlib1g (= 1:1.2.1), kino (= 0.7) [...] Looks like libstdc++6 to me. trying to preview the Luma plugin, i get: Leaving Editor Left Editor Starting Editor Leaving Editor Left Editor Starting magick Illegal instruction running in gdb: Starting Editor [Thread -147917600 (LWP 20798) exited] Leaving Editor Left Editor Starting magick Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. [Switching to Thread -134462688 (LWP 20736)] 0x1011ba68 in vtable for __cxxabiv1::__si_class_type_info () (gdb) (gdb) bt full #0 0x1011ba68 in vtable for __cxxabiv1::__si_class_type_info () No symbol table info available. #1 0x100c99a0 in GDKImageTransitionRepository::SelectionChange () No symbol table info available. #2 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #4 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #5 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #7 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #8 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () ---Type return to continue, or q return to quit--- from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #9 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #10 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #11 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #12 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #13 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #14 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #15 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. ---Type return to continue, or q return to quit--- #16 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #17 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #18 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #19 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #20 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #21 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #22 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #23 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 ---Type return to continue, or q return to quit--- No symbol table info available. #24 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #25 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #26 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID () from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 No symbol table info available. #27 0x0f57af54 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
Bug#330005: marked as forwarded (sctplib_1:1.0.4-1: FTBFS: 'union sockunion' has no member named 'sin6')
Your message dated Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:23:12 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] has caused the Debian Bug report #330005, regarding sctplib_1:1.0.4-1: FTBFS: 'union sockunion' has no member named 'sin6' to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) Michael Tüxen [EMAIL PROTECTED]. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Received: (at 330005-forwarded) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 05:23:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 22:23:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe-60-224-188-178.vic.bigpond.net.au (nukak.apana.org.au) [60.224.188.178] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJOzI-0001sY-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:23:44 -0700 Received: by nukak.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 04D0C6842DE; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:23:12 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:23:12 +1000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?An=EDbal?= Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael =?iso-8859-1?Q?T=FCxen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: sctplib_1:1.0.4-1: FTBFS: 'union sockunion' has no member named 'sin6' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=YB12yukDSDS6vHSd Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --YB12yukDSDS6vHSd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 03:10:34PM +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: Package: sctplib Severity: serious Version: 1:1.0.4-1 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of sctplib_1:1.0.4-1 on goedel by sbuild/alpha 65 Build started at 20050925-0608 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: libglib1.2-dev, bzip2 [...] adaptation.c: In function 'adl_gatherLocalAddresses': adaptation.c:3214: error: 'union sockunion' has no member named 'sin6' Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org. Please refer to the build log at: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=sctplibver=1%3A1.0.4-1arch=alphastamp=1127621351file=logas=raw Anibal Monsalve Salazar Hello Michael, I'm forwarding this bug report to you as upstream author. Please preserve the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when you reply, so that the bug tracking system will file your reply with the original report. Kind Regards, Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal --YB12yukDSDS6vHSd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDNjRAgY5NIXPNpFURAsWlAKCDrvuueVN8rT0MB5fR9/hfTTkhIwCfYPc0 eHbBL5LyUgyFUW6PgYF760w= =1k+T -END PGP SIGNATURE- --YB12yukDSDS6vHSd-- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#318529: bow: FTBFS: Cannot install docs
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 01:09:38AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote: Hi! Please find attached patch for Makefile-in to only process texi with texi2html files that succeed. So it build again. Ok. I will apply it right away. Additionaly there are many warnings during build and something is outdated, so the package needs some work. I know, the package is mostly orphaned upstream. Since no package depends on it anymore I'm considering asking it to be removed from Debian. Regards Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#329983: marked as done (python2.4-ctypes: package cannot be installed on my unstable Debian system)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329983: fixed in ctypes 0.9.6+cvs20050925-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 22:46:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 15:46:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJImx-0005Cr-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 15:46:35 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2005 22:46:03 - Received: from p5489B82F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.3]) [84.137.184.47] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 25 Sep 2005 00:46:03 +0200 X-Authenticated: #10011330 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 00:45:39 +0200 From: Andre Heynatz [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python2.4-ctypes: package cannot be installed on my unstable Debian system Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: python2.4-ctypes Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Package depends on libffi2, which is not available in unstable repository. Instead, libffi4 is available. Please adapt to the new lib. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 329983-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 05:38:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 22:38:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJP7N-0002sS-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:32:05 -0700 From: Ganesan Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329983: fixed in ctypes 0.9.6+cvs20050925-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:32:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: ctypes Source-Version: 0.9.6+cvs20050925-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ctypes, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/ctypes/ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1.diff.gz ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1.dsc to pool/main/c/ctypes/ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1.dsc ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/ctypes/ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925.orig.tar.gz python-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/ctypes/python-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_all.deb python2.3-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/ctypes/python2.3-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_i386.deb python2.4-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/ctypes/python2.4-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ganesan Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ctypes package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:57:41 +0530 Source: ctypes Binary: python2.4-ctypes python-ctypes python2.3-ctypes Architecture: source all i386 Version:
Bug#329986: marked as done (python2.3-ctypes: package cannot be installed on my unstable Debian system)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:32:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329986: fixed in ctypes 0.9.6+cvs20050925-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Sep 2005 23:29:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 16:29:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pop.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJJSK-0003ie-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:29:20 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2005 23:28:49 - Received: from p5489B82F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.0.3]) [84.137.184.47] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 25 Sep 2005 01:28:49 +0200 X-Authenticated: #10011330 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 01:28:29 +0200 From: Andre Heynatz [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: python2.3-ctypes: package cannot be installed on my unstable Debian system Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: python2.3-ctypes Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Package depends on libffi2, which is not available in unstable repository. Instead, libffi4 is available. Please adapt to the new lib. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) --- Received: (at 329986-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 05:38:10 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 24 22:38:10 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJP7O-0002sU-00; Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:32:06 -0700 From: Ganesan Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#329986: fixed in ctypes 0.9.6+cvs20050925-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 22:32:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: ctypes Source-Version: 0.9.6+cvs20050925-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of ctypes, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/ctypes/ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1.diff.gz ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1.dsc to pool/main/c/ctypes/ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1.dsc ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/c/ctypes/ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925.orig.tar.gz python-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_all.deb to pool/main/c/ctypes/python-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_all.deb python2.3-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/ctypes/python2.3-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_i386.deb python2.4-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/ctypes/python2.4-ctypes_0.9.6+cvs20050925-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Ganesan Rajagopal [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated ctypes package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:57:41 +0530 Source: ctypes Binary: python2.4-ctypes python-ctypes python2.3-ctypes Architecture: source all i386 Version:
Processed: Re: Bug#329920: xlibmesa-dri: hardware 3D acceleration doesn't work on Voodoo4 (tdfx/glide3) [regression]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 329920 important Bug#329920: xlibmesa-dri: hardware 3D acceleration doesn't work on Voodoo4 (tdfx/glide3) [regression] Severity set to `important'. reassign 329920 libglide3 Bug#329920: xlibmesa-dri: hardware 3D acceleration doesn't work on Voodoo4 (tdfx/glide3) [regression] Bug reassigned from package `xlibmesa-dri' to `libglide3'. merge 326099 329920 Bug#326099: /usr/lib/libglide3.so.3: undefined symbol: __LINE__ Bug#329920: xlibmesa-dri: hardware 3D acceleration doesn't work on Voodoo4 (tdfx/glide3) [regression] Merged 326099 329920. kthxbye Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Bug Triage
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 327744 Bug#327744: [FTBFS] libxrender missing libxt-dev build-dep 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] close 327527 Bug#327527: libxrender: Missing X build dependency 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Roger Leigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] severity 329916 normal Bug#329916: xorg-x11: Unable to change focus from galeon or firefox Severity set to `normal'. close 325264 Bug#325264: xlibs: Fails to upgrade from 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] reassign 309246 nvidia-glx Bug#309246: xlibmesa-gl fails to configure when installing Bug reassigned from package `xlibmesa-gl' to `nvidia-glx'. retitle 309246 Upgrade issues from xlibmesa-gl 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 to 4.3.0.dfsg.1-13 Bug#309246: xlibmesa-gl fails to configure when installing Changed Bug title. close 303803 Bug#303803: Debian xserver-xfree86 packages does not support recent notebooks 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Hadmut Danisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327843: marked as done (kwifimanager: applet crashes with new libiw28)
Your message dated Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:02:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327843: fixed in kdenetwork 4:3.4.2-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 13:37:39 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 06:37:39 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEoV8-0001WI-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 06:37:38 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEoV7-0003JC-Fg for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:37:37 +0200 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:37:37 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kwifimanager: applet crashes with new libiw28 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kwifimanager Version: 4:3.4.2-2 Severity: serious - Forwarded message from Jan De Luyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] - =46rom: Jan De Luyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 07:27:56 +0200 Subject: [3.4.2] kwifimanager causes kicker crash X-Mailing-List: debian-kde@lists.debian.org archive/latest/24394 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Hello list, This morning, when firing up my trusty KDE, I was seeing repeated kicker=20 crashes. Some searching (and testing with a blank .kde) led me to the fault= y=20 package: kwifimanager. For some reason, as soon as I include the applett in= =20 kicker, it crashes. I've temporarily removed the kwifimanager package to be able to use KDE, bu= t=20 I'm pretty stumped - it worked perfectly yesterday, the only thing I've don= e=20 since is remove -dev packages... The backtrace is useless. Anyone any pointer? Thanks, Jan --=20 No animal should ever jump on the dining room furniture unless absolutely certain he can hold his own in conversation. -- Fran Lebowitz --=20 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] rg - End forwarded message - - Forwarded message from Jan De Luyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] - =46rom: Jan De Luyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 07:45:05 +0200 Subject: Re: [3.4.2] kwifimanager causes kicker crash [solved] X-Mailing-List: debian-kde@lists.debian.org archive/latest/24395 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 On Thursday 08 September 2005 07:27, Jan De Luyck wrote: Hello list, This morning, when firing up my trusty KDE, I was seeing repeated kicker crashes. Some searching (and testing with a blank .kde) led me to the faulty package: kwifimanager. For some reason, as soon as I include the applett in kicker, it crashes. To follow up on myself, this is caused by the upgrade of libiw28. Downgradi= ng=20 to libiw28-27+28pre8-1 solves the problem again. Jan --=20 Before borrowing money from a friend, decide which you need more. -- Addison H. Hallock --=20 To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] rg - End forwarded message - - Forwarded message from Adeodato Sim=C3=B3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - =46rom: Adeodato Sim=C3=B3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jan De Luyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: debian-kde@lists.debian.org Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 01:18:07 +0200 Subject: Re: [3.4.2] kwifimanager causes kicker crash [solved] X-Mailing-List: debian-kde@lists.debian.org archive/latest/24448 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i * Jan De Luyck [Thu, 08 Sep 2005 07:45:05 +0200]: To follow up on myself, this is caused by the upgrade of libiw28. Downgra= ding=20 to libiw28-27+28pre8-1 solves the problem again. Right... will fix by itself in the next upload. (For other packagers: latest version of libiw28 drops the _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ symbol; I don't know very well what causes this, but a simple rebuild will fix. Was there a
Processed: Fixed already
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: close 329832 2.10.1-4 Bug#329832: Installation fails: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/sgml/gconf/gconf-1.0.dtd', which is also in package gconf2 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 2.10.1-4, send any further explanations to Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] merge 329832 329711 Bug#329711: gconf2-common: installation fails Bug#329832: Installation fails: trying to overwrite `/usr/share/sgml/gconf/gconf-1.0.dtd', which is also in package gconf2 Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #329711 has `gconf2-common'; #329832 has `gconf2' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
