Bug#332459: marked as done (FTBFS: libmagick++ transition)
Your message dated Fri, 07 Oct 2005 23:32:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332459: fixed in kxstitch 0.7-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 15:55:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 08:55:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outmx014.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.69] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENY62-0001lT-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:55:50 -0700 Received: from outmx014.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx014.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96Ftmke011870 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:55:48 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (252.52-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.52.252]) by outmx014.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96FtiHh011825 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:55:44 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:55:16 +0200 From: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051001) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: libmagick++ transition X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: kxstitch Severity: serious Version: 0.7-1 Please upload your Build-Depends to depend on libmagick++9-dev | libmagick++-dev instead of libmagick++6-dev Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRUjk5UTeB5t8Mo0RAtOMAKCNXyiBwyCeQm0vVxBuHTKEN3+cCQCfa/dc 3IqznWDDX/+vq/diGkhWH+Y= =xoq+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 332459-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 06:38:31 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 23:38:31 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EO8Fd-0001CR-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 23:32:09 -0700 From: eric pareja [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332459: fixed in kxstitch 0.7-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 23:32:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: kxstitch Source-Version: 0.7-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kxstitch, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kxstitch_0.7-2.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kxstitch/kxstitch_0.7-2.diff.gz kxstitch_0.7-2.dsc to pool/main/k/kxstitch/kxstitch_0.7-2.dsc kxstitch_0.7-2_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kxstitch/kxstitch_0.7-2_i386.deb kxstitch_0.7-2_sparc.deb to pool/main/k/kxstitch/kxstitch_0.7-2_sparc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. eric pareja [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated kxstitch package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 02:15:49 +0800 Source: kxstitch Binary: kxstitch Architecture: source i386 sparc Version: 0.7-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: eric pareja [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: eric pareja [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: kxstitch - cross-stitch pattern creator and editor for KDE Closes: 332459 Changes: kxstitch (0.7-2)
Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #14619 (project findutils): I've moved the other issue that Eroc discovered to bug #14748. Andreas, do you have any further thoughts on this? If you still believe it's a bug I'll refer to the POSIX documentation and try to figure out a way forward. However, if in any case you're also happy that this is not a software bug, do you have any thoughts on how we can improve the documentation to explain things better? ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=14619 ___ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332726: mono-apache-server: mod-mono-server claims that mod_mono and xsp have different versions
Package: mono-apache-server Version: 1.0.5-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Seems all the mod-mono functionality is now broken, and apache returns a code 500 (internal server error) for all of it. So in order to find out what was going on, I started mod-mono-server by hand, thusly: su www-data -c '/usr/bin/mono /usr/share/dotnet/bin/mod-mono-server.exe --filename /tmp/.mod_mono_server --nonstop --appconfigdir /etc/mono-server' I then hit the web server (http://localhost/samples) and got the following output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/mono-server# su www-data -c '/usr/bin/mono /usr/share/dotnet/bin/mod-mono-server.exe --filename /tmp/.mod_mono_server --nonstop --appconfigdir /etc/mono-server' mod-mono-server Listening on: /tmp/.mod_mono_server Root directory: /etc/mono-server In ModMonoWorker.Run: mod_mono and xsp have different versions. And yet, both mono-apache-server and mono-xsp packages are at 1.0.5-2! However, the mono framework itself is now at 1.1.9.1. In any case, this situation renders mod_mono completely dead, hence the grave severity of this bug. This bug is actually probably a dup of 303755, but the submitter of that bug marked it as normal and didn't give any useful information. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages mono-apache-server depends on: ii debconf 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii libapache-mod-mono1.0-1 Run ASP.NET Pages on UNIX with Apa ii mono-classlib-1.0 1.1.9.1-3 Mono class library (1.0) ii mono-jit 1.1.9.1-3 fast CLI (.NET) JIT compiler for M ii mono-mcs 1.1.9.1-3 Mono C# compiler mono-apache-server recommends no packages. -- debconf information: * monoserver/monoserver_restartapache: true -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332729: curl_7.14.1-3(experimental/mips/sigrun): FTBFS - autoconf error
Package: curl Version: 7.14.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Heya, Autobuilding of the new experimental curl package fails: [...] dpkg-buildpackage: source package is curl dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 7.14.1-3 dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture mips /usr/bin/sudo debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -rf test-stamp build-stamp configure-stamp debian/build debian/build-gnutls debian/tmp-gnutls dh_clean debian/shlibs.local debian/rules build dh_testdir mkdir -p debian/build debian/build-gnutls tar -c --exclude=debian . | tar -C debian/build-gnutls -x cat debian/gnutls-soname.patch | (cd debian/build-gnutls patch -p1) patching file lib/Makefile.am patching file src/Makefile.am cd debian/build-gnutls aclocal-1.7 automake-1.7 lib/Makefile.am:37: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined lib/Makefile.am:37: lib/Makefile.am:37: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' lib/Makefile.am:37: to `configure.ac' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again. [...] I'd love to give you a hint why this happens, but my autofoo knowledge (especially regarding libtool) isn't that good. Thanks, Marc -- BOFH #287: Telecommunications is downshifting. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332733: mingw32 - fails to build
Package: mingw32 Version: 3.4.4.20050522.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mingw32_3.4.4.20050522.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-error -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I. -I. -I/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/src/gcc-3.4.4-20050522-1/gcc -I/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/src/gcc-3.4.4-20050522-1/gcc/. -I/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/src/gcc-3.4.4-20050522-1/gcc/../include c-parse.c -o c-parse.o gcc: c-parse.c: No such file or directory gcc: no input files make[2]: *** [c-parse.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/objs/gcc' make[1]: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/objs' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051008-0307 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332734: egoboo - fails to build
Package: egoboo Version: 2.22-22 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of egoboo_2.22-22 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4), docbook-utils | docbook-to-man, xlibmesa-gl-dev (= 4.1.0), libsdl1.2-dev (= 1.2.2) [...] gcc camera.o char.o enchant.o game.o graphic.o input.o menu.o module.o network.o particle.o passage.o script.o sound.o lin-file.o gltexture.o mathstuff.o graphicfan.o graphicmad.o graphicprt.o configfile.o -D_LINUX -ffast-math -funroll-loops -Wall -g -O2 `sdl-config --cflags` -I/usr/X11/include -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/lib `sdl-config --libs` -lXxf86vm -lGL -o egoboo /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lXxf86vm collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [egoboo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/egoboo-2.22/code' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/egoboo-2.22' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051008-0438 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332732: mingw32-binutils - fails to build
Package: mingw32-binutils Version: 2.16.91-20050827.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mingw32-binutils_2.16.91-20050827.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0), gettext, bison, flex, perl [...] WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX, DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or the `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site. make[3]: *** [/build/buildd/mingw32-binutils-2.16.91-20050827.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.16.91-20050827-1/bfd/doc/bfd.info] Error 1 Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332701: marked as done (FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 01:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332701: fixed in egoboo 2.22-22 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 00:57:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 17:57:00 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EO31H-0006Kp-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 17:57:00 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j980usWn075168 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 17:56:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ENvfx-00013y-MS for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 10:06:29 -0700 Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 10:06:29 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1121/Fri Oct 7 10:38:02 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: egoboo Version: 2.22-21 Severity: serious egoboo fails to build because its build-dependency on xlibmesa-dev cannot be satisfied: - Considering xlibmesa-dev (=3D 4.1.0) Tried versions:=20 - Does not satisfy version, not trying E: Could not satisfy build-dependency. --=20 Matt --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRqsVfNdgYxVXvBARAiRhAJ9sf9mdBWKqKaOuieLoMMcnprSo3gCfe+Fc 8+X4vpKOrFpDnwqVI+UHP20= =mXJ2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24-- --- Received: (at 332701-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 08:38:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 01:38:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOA7h-0001jI-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 01:32:05 -0700 From: Julien Lemoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332701: fixed in egoboo 2.22-22 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 01:32:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: egoboo Source-Version: 2.22-22 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of egoboo, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: egoboo_2.22-22.diff.gz to pool/main/e/egoboo/egoboo_2.22-22.diff.gz egoboo_2.22-22.dsc to pool/main/e/egoboo/egoboo_2.22-22.dsc egoboo_2.22-22_i386.deb to pool/main/e/egoboo/egoboo_2.22-22_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Julien Lemoine [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated egoboo package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #14619 (project findutils): Jay wrote: Andreas, do you have any further thoughts on this? No, I don't. I am grateful that Eric has taken the time to explain what kind of strings POSIX accepts, which was my main problem. I am going to close the respective Debian bug with pointers to documentation and a warning in NEWS.Debian. do you have any thoughts on how we can improve the documentation to explain things better If I have, I'll come up with a patch. ;-) thanks, cu andreas ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=14619 ___ Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329811: evolution: ping ?
Package: evolution Followup-For: Bug #329811 any news ? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332740: chmlib - changed soname without conflicts
Package: chmlib Version: 0.36-2 Severity: serious chmlib changed the soname of the lib without conflicting with any package which uses them. Please reread policy 8.1. Bastian -- Emotions are alien to me. I'm a scientist. -- Spock, This Side of Paradise, stardate 3417.3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332742: ruby1.8: [CAN-2005-2337] safe mode bypass
Package: ruby1.8 Version: 1.8.2-9 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Hi! There is a safe mode bypass in all Ruby versions: http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/20051003.html This page also contains a patch (which does not apply perfectly since the XMLRPC issue is already fixed, but for eval.c it applies fine). This has been assigned CAN-2005-2337, please mention this number in the changelog when you fix this. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntulinux.org Debian Developerhttp://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332732: mingw32-binutils - fails to build
Already noted, working on fixing the build-deps now. thanks! Ron On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:37:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: mingw32-binutils Version: 2.16.91-20050827.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mingw32-binutils_2.16.91-20050827.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0), gettext, bison, flex, perl [...] WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX, DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or the `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site. make[3]: *** [/build/buildd/mingw32-binutils-2.16.91-20050827.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.16.91-20050827-1/bfd/doc/bfd.info] Error 1 Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332457: marked as done (FTBFS: imagemagick transition)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:32:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332457: fixed in labplot 1.5.0.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 15:53:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 08:53:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outmx011.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.3] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENY44-0001OZ-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:53:48 -0700 Received: from outmx011.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx011.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96Frjc7016606 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:53:47 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (252.52-136-217.adsl.skynet.be [217.136.52.252]) by outmx011.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j96FrhXF016575 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 17:53:43 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:53:15 +0200 From: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051001) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: imagemagick transition X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: labplot Severity: serious Version: 1.5.0.2-1 Please upload your Build-Depends to depend on libmagick9-dev | libmagick-dev, libmagick++9-dev | libmagick++-dev instead of libmagick6-dev, libmagick++6-dev Cheers Luk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDRUhr5UTeB5t8Mo0RAnujAJsFALlQz8MNeKNEwhZ0xPmi3kMakgCffpfk ya+2wgBLKE43XK+MVdEbN/M= =YHO/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 332457-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 09:38:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 02:38:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOB3p-0004n8-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:32:09 -0700 From: Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332457: fixed in labplot 1.5.0.4-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 02:32:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: labplot Source-Version: 1.5.0.4-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of labplot, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: labplot_1.5.0.4-1.diff.gz to pool/main/l/labplot/labplot_1.5.0.4-1.diff.gz labplot_1.5.0.4-1.dsc to pool/main/l/labplot/labplot_1.5.0.4-1.dsc labplot_1.5.0.4-1_i386.deb to pool/main/l/labplot/labplot_1.5.0.4-1_i386.deb labplot_1.5.0.4.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/l/labplot/labplot_1.5.0.4.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated labplot package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:53:48 +1000 Source: labplot Binary: labplot Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.5.0.4-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Helen Faulkner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: labplot- data plotting
Bug#318946: marked as done (shorewall: A client accepted by MAC address filtering to bypass any other rule)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:17:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318946: fixed in shorewall 2.2.3-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2005 19:17:02 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 18 12:17:02 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vsmtp1alice.tin.it [212.216.176.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1Dub6r-0007vh-00; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:17:02 -0700 Received: from sawfish.shadow.net (82.50.78.89) by vsmtp1alice.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 42D22FB9000C74B0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:16:29 +0200 Received: from martignlo by sawfish.shadow.net with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Dub7K-0004RO-23 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:17:30 +0200 From: Lorenzo Martignoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: shorewall: A client accepted by MAC address filtering to bypass any other rule Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:17:30 +0200 X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using From header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: shorewall Version: 2.4.1-2 Severity: critical Tags: security A client accepted by MAC address filtering can bypass any other rule. If MACLIST_TTL is set to a value greater than 0 or MACLIST_DISPOSITION is set to ACCEPT in /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf (default is MACLIST_TTL=0 and MACLIST_DISPOSITION=REJECT), and a client is positively identified through its MAC address, it bypasses all other policies/rules in place, thus gaining access to all open services on the firewall. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages shorewall depends on: ii debconf 1.4.49 Debian configuration management sy ii iproute 20041019-3 Professional tools to control the ii iptables 1.2.11-10 Linux kernel 2.4+ iptables adminis -- debconf information: shorewall/upgrade_20_22: shorewall/upgrade_14_20: shorewall/upgrade_to_14: shorewall/warnrfc1918: * shorewall/dont_restart: shorewall/major_release: true --- Received: (at 318946-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 10:18:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 03:18:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOBlJ-0003n4-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:17:05 -0700 From: Lorenzo Martignoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#318946: fixed in shorewall 2.2.3-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:17:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: shorewall Source-Version: 2.2.3-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of shorewall, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: shorewall_2.2.3-2.diff.gz to pool/main/s/shorewall/shorewall_2.2.3-2.diff.gz shorewall_2.2.3-2.dsc to pool/main/s/shorewall/shorewall_2.2.3-2.dsc shorewall_2.2.3-2_all.deb to pool/main/s/shorewall/shorewall_2.2.3-2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Lorenzo Martignoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated shorewall package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a
Bug#332732: marked as done (mingw32-binutils - fails to build)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:05:41 +0930 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332732: mingw32-binutils - fails to build has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 08:38:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 01:38:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org [82.139.201.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOADW-0006BO-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 01:38:06 -0700 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5920F1834F; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:37:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:37:48 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mingw32-binutils - fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mingw32-binutils Version: 2.16.91-20050827.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mingw32-binutils_2.16.91-20050827.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0), gettext, bison, flex, perl [...] WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX, DU, IRIX). You might want to install the `Texinfo' package or the `GNU make' package. Grab either from any GNU archive site. make[3]: *** [/build/buildd/mingw32-binutils-2.16.91-20050827.1/build_dir/src/binutils-2.16.91-20050827-1/bfd/doc/bfd.info] Error 1 Bastian --- Received: (at 332732-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 10:39:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 03:39:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ppp237-84.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net (hank.shelbyville.oz) [203.122.237.84] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOC6Y-0004t1-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 03:39:03 -0700 Received: from ron by hank.shelbyville.oz with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EOC3J-000273-6q for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 20:05:41 +0930 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:05:41 +0930 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#332732: mingw32-binutils - fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -2 seems to have done the trick for this one, waiting to see if the same is true for the other package now. Ron On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 06:54:16PM +0930, Ron wrote: Already noted, working on fixing the build-deps now. thanks! Ron On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:37:48AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: mingw32-binutils Version: 2.16.91-20050827.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mingw32-binutils_2.16.91-20050827.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0), gettext, bison, flex, perl [...] WARNING: `makeinfo' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified a `.texi' or `.texinfo' file, or any other file indirectly affecting the aspect of the manual. The spurious call might also be the consequence of using a buggy `make' (AIX, DU, IRIX). You might
Bug#328663: very old package, should this be removed?
retitle 328663 ctklight -- RoM; old, out of date, unused reassign 328663 ftp.debian.org severity 328663 normal thanks Michael Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-16T18:30+0200]: During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very long time could cover up some QA problems. I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose to remove it. There are almost no users and the package is also quite out of date wrt Debian's policies. There is also a new upstream version, but neither have you packaged it, nor has someone requested it in the BTS. If the debian-haskell team (CC'd) has nothing against it, I agree with the removal of package ctklight. I haven't heard back from you, so I'm reassigning this bug to the ftp-team, so that the package can be removed. If someone is interested in maintaining it at a later point, a new upload should be no problem. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 203: Öffentliche Adressverzeichnisse Spammers Umschreibung für das Usenet. (Marc Haber) pgp4IdBCUN3UJ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#328663: very old package, should this be removed?
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 328663 ctklight -- RoM; old, out of date, unused Bug#328663: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. reassign 328663 ftp.debian.org Bug#328663: ctklight -- RoM; old, out of date, unused Bug reassigned from package `ctklight' to `ftp.debian.org'. severity 328663 normal Bug#328663: ctklight -- RoM; old, out of date, unused Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329358: marked as done (findutils: '-perm +...' broken in 4.2.25)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:11:21 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#329358: findutils: -perm doesn't work has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 10:47:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 21 03:47:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mail.bmlv.gv.at [193.171.152.37] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EI28m-0001l5-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:47:52 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bmlv.gv.at (mail) with ESMTP id CCCFF5FA77 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:47:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Ph. Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: findutils: -perm doesn't work Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:47:14 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at bmlv.gv.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: findutils Version: 4.2.25-1 Severity: important # find /usr/bin/ -type f -perm +x # ls -la /usr/bin/ | head -6 insgesamt 215060 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 94208 2005-09-21 07:59 . drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 2005-07-20 10:14 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23368 2005-09-04 03:32 [ -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5644 2005-09-04 23:04 411toppm -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 39 2005-08-11 01:52 7z # find /usr/bin/ -type f | wc 21832183 41277 # find /usr/bin/ -type f -perm +o+x | wc 0 0 0 4.2.24-1 was ok. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_AT) Versions of packages findutils depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an findutils recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 329358-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 11:11:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 04:11:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from m26s25.vlinux.de [83.151.30.59] ([PhfXSMQTFg1IJGPTPV8Y5NvUC2V8Idjz]) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOCbx-0007yP-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 04:11:29 -0700 Received: from adsl-204.254.166.194.arpa.as1901.net ([194.166.254.204] helo=argenau.downhill.at.eu.org ident=[Qw3kYVQt4N3/UvKLF6PixXZK+9Y89UW0]) by m26s25.vlinux.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1EOCcF-0002Q8-Nn for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:11:51 + Received: from ametzler by argenau.downhill.at.eu.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EOCbp-000395-IR for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:11:21 +0200 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 13:11:21 +0200 From: Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#329358: findutils: -perm doesn't work Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-GPG-Fingerprint: BCF7 1345 BE42 B5B8 1A57 EE09 1D33 9C65 8B8D 7663 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On 2005-09-21 Ph. Marek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # find /usr/bin/ -type f -perm +x # ls -la /usr/bin/ | head -6 insgesamt 215060 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 94208 2005-09-21 07:59 . drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 4096 2005-07-20 10:14 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 23368 2005-09-04 03:32 [ -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5644 2005-09-04 23:04 411toppm -rwxr-xr-x
Bug#332733: marked as done (mingw32 - fails to build)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:45:24 +0930 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332733: mingw32 - fails to build has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 08:41:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 01:41:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org [82.139.201.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOAGO-0007FF-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 01:41:04 -0700 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EE3AE1834F; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:40:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 10:40:47 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mingw32 - fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: mingw32 Version: 3.4.4.20050522.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mingw32_3.4.4.20050522.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-error -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I. -I. -I/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/src/gcc-3.4.4-20050522-1/gcc -I/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/src/gcc-3.4.4-20050522-1/gcc/. -I/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/src/gcc-3.4.4-20050522-1/gcc/../include c-parse.c -o c-parse.o gcc: c-parse.c: No such file or directory gcc: no input files make[2]: *** [c-parse.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/objs/gcc' make[1]: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/objs' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20051008-0307 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Bastian --- Received: (at 332733-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 11:18:40 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 04:18:40 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ppp237-84.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net (hank.shelbyville.oz) [203.122.237.84] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOCit-0001EO-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 04:18:40 -0700 Received: from ron by hank.shelbyville.oz with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EOCfk-0002CA-3C for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 20:45:24 +0930 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:45:24 +0930 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#332733: mingw32 - fails to build Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Ok, looks like the -2 for this one will pass muster too. cheers, Ron On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 10:40:47AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: mingw32 Version: 3.4.4.20050522.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of mingw32_3.4.4.20050522.1-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] gcc -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_COMPILE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-error -DHAVE_CONFIG_H-I. -I. -I/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/src/gcc-3.4.4-20050522-1/gcc -I/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/src/gcc-3.4.4-20050522-1/gcc/. -I/build/buildd/mingw32-3.4.4.20050522.1/build_dir/src/gcc-3.4.4-20050522-1/gcc/../include c-parse.c -o c-parse.o
Bug#332751: wmmisc: every time receives SIGABRT just after start
Package: wmmisc Version: 0.9-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Every time receives SIGABRT just after start. IMHO - i am not programmer, i am maybe wrong, it occurs in wmgeneral.c:openXwindow() because it tries to free pointers pointing to argv[]. Package is unusable in this state unless user sets MALLOC_CHECK_ environment variable to 0 or 1. Hope this helps. Fast fix: --- wmmisc-0.9/src/wmgeneral.c 2004-04-20 03:36:31.0 +0200 +++ wmmisc-0.9.fixed/src/wmgeneral.c2005-10-08 12:51:41.0 +0200 @@ -394,10 +394,4 @@ XMoveWindow (display, win, wx, wy); } - - if (display_name != NULL) -free (display_name); - - if (wname != NULL) -free (wname); } -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-archck7-top-dave-1 Locale: LANG=cs_CZ, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages wmmisc depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxpm4 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X pixmap library ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Window System client libraries m wmmisc recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332753: xlibmesa-gl-dev: cannot link OpenGL app: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL
Package: xlibmesa-gl-dev Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable I tried to compile lesson02 from the NeHe OpenGL Tutorial (SDL GLX variant): $ make gcc -Wall -ansi lesson02.c -o lesson02 `sdl-config --cflags --libs` -lGL -lGLU /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Looking closer at the problem: gcc -Wall -ansi lesson02.c -o lesson02 -Wl,--verbose `sdl-config --cflags --libs` -lGL -lGLU attempt to open /usr/lib/libGL.so failed attempt to open /usr/lib/libGL.a failed attempt to open /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/libGL.so failed attempt to open /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/libGL.a failed attempt to open /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/libGL.so failed attempt to open /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.2/libGL.a failed d attempt to open /usr/lib/gcc/i4/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lGL GNU ld obviously expects from a shared object that a filename ending with '.so' is provided, without version information. Often, this is a symlink. Here is what I have done to fix the problem: $ su # cd /usr/lib # ln -s libGL.so.1 libGL.so # ldconfig It should be possible to compile OpenGL programs out of the box, even if the patch above is simple. Andre Heynatz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages xlibmesa-gl-dev depends on: ii libc6-dev [libc-dev] 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libx11-dev6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext-dev 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii x-dev 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 X protocol development files ii xlibmesa-gl 6.8.2.dfsg.1-8 Mesa 3D graphics library [X.Org] xlibmesa-gl-dev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#321573: marked as done (libadplug0c2: depends on libbinio1c2 without declaring it.)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 04:47:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321573: fixed in adplug 1.5.1-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 09:43:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 06 02:43:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from meow.kitten.net.au [202.1.227.98] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E1LDe-0003k3-00; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 02:43:55 -0700 Received: from aaron by meow.kitten.net.au with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E1LD7-0002pI-0B; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:43:21 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Aaron Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: adplug-utils: depends on libbinio1c2 without declaring it. X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15 Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 19:43:20 +1000 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: adplug-utils Version: 1.5.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This package can be installed without the libbinio1c2 package being present, however, adlugdb is dynamicly linked against libbinio.so.1. Given that's the only binary, this package is unusable unless libbinio1c2 is installed. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers experimental APT policy: (1000, 'experimental'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_AU, LC_CTYPE=en_AU (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages adplug-utils depends on: ii libadplug0c2 1.5.1-3free AdLib sound library adplug-utils recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 321573-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 11:47:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 04:47:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EODAQ-nU-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 04:47:06 -0700 From: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#321573: fixed in adplug 1.5.1-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 04:47:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: adplug Source-Version: 1.5.1-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of adplug, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: adplug-utils_1.5.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/adplug/adplug-utils_1.5.1-4_i386.deb adplug_1.5.1-4.diff.gz to pool/main/a/adplug/adplug_1.5.1-4.diff.gz adplug_1.5.1-4.dsc to pool/main/a/adplug/adplug_1.5.1-4.dsc libadplug-dev_1.5.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/adplug/libadplug-dev_1.5.1-4_i386.deb libadplug0c2_1.5.1-4_i386.deb to pool/main/a/adplug/libadplug0c2_1.5.1-4_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated adplug package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 13:34:00 +0200 Source: adplug Binary: libadplug0c2 adplug-utils libadplug-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.5.1-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: adplug-utils - free AdLib sound library (utils) libadplug-dev - free
Bug#332622: exult - fails to build
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:21:19PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: dpkg-source: extracting exult in exult-1.2 +--+ | sbuild Warning: | | --- | | After unpacking, there exists a file debian/files with the contents: | | | | exult_0.98rc1-1_i386.deb contrib/games extra | | exult-tools_0.98rc1-1_i386.deb contrib/games extra | | | | This should be reported as a bug.| | The file has been removed to avoid dpkg-genchanges errors. | +--+ - clean don't properly clean the sources. If you mean debian/files, that is a problem with the upstream tarball, which has a obsolete and bogus debian/ directory lying around: nighthawk~/debian/mine$ tar tzvf exult_1.2.orig.tar.gz | grep debian\/files -rw-r--r-- 1000/100 96 2002-03-13 15:40:51 exult-1.2/debian/files I am not sure I can do anyting about this, or did you mean anything else? Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327174: The bug could be in the taskbar plugin
Hi, I'm able to launch fbpanel if the taskbar plugin is not used, otherwise it crashes at startup. I hope it helps. Regards, Manolo. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332622: exult - fails to build
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 02:10:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: I am not sure I can do anyting about this, or did you mean anything else? Remove the whole debian directory from the upstream sources. Bastian -- Fascinating, a totally parochial attitude. -- Spock, Metamorphosis, stardate 3219.8 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332622: exult - fails to build
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 02:37:41PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 02:10:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: I am not sure I can do anyting about this, or did you mean anything else? Remove the whole debian directory from the upstream sources. I don't think this warning warrants repack ging the .orig.tar.gz - I might do it for the next upstream release (if it ever happens). Are there any pressing technical needs to do so? Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: upgrading severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 317485 serious Bug#317485: xconq: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: label at end of compound statement Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332742: ruby1.8: [CAN-2005-2337] safe mode bypass
Martin Pitt wrote: There is a safe mode bypass in all Ruby versions: I already prepared the new package and sent a notice to security team. But I cannot yet get DSA -- akira yamada -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332622: exult - fails to build
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 02:49:47PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: Are there any pressing technical needs to do so? It violates the policy, as clean can't restore the original value. Bastian -- Our way is peace. -- Septimus, the Son Worshiper, Bread and Circuses, stardate 4040.7.
Bug#332768: apt-cacher: falls if used in conjunction with apt-listbugs
Package: apt-cacher Version: 1.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable with apt-cacher on a 'server' and apt-listbugs on a 'client' then when getting packages the listbugs falls over: Fetched 46.2MB in 3m56s (195kB/s) Reading package fields... Done Reading package status... Done Retrieving bug reports... 0% [0/111] W: getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution: xml-core W: getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution: libgksu1.2-0 W: getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution: esound-common W: getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution: libscrollkeeper0 W: getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution: hicolor-icon-theme W: getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution: libgtk2.0-bin W: getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution: gnome-desktop-data ... E: Too many errors while retrieving bug reports E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 ; read a /dev/tty ); fi returned an error code (10) E: Failure running script if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 ; read a /dev/tty ); fi Note that this problem does not occur if apt-get install is run on the 'server' -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages apt-cacher depends on: ii bzip2 1.0.2-8high-quality block-sorting file co ii libwww-perl 5.803-4WWW client/server library for Perl ii perl 5.8.7-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction apt-cacher recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330639: marked as done (cssc needs rebuild on ia64 for c++ transition)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 06:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#330639: fixed in cssc 1.0.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 01:15:54 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 28 18:15:54 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.55]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKn1d-0006B1-00; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:15:53 -0700
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-109-167.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.109.167])
by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
j8T1FpFe025270;
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:15:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EKn1b-0002m0-4G; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:15:51 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cssc needs rebuild on ia64 for c++ transition
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:15:51 -0400
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: cssc
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
cssc has accidentally been built with the wrong version of g++ on ia64,
as noted at http://people.debian.org/~mfurr/gxx/broken.html.
Please rebuild it on ia64 with g++ 4.0 and binNMU.
---
Received: (at 330639-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 13:18:09 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 06:18:09 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOEZX-0002Em-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 06:17:07 -0700
From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#330639: fixed in cssc 1.0.1-3
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 06:17:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: cssc
Source-Version: 1.0.1-3
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cssc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
cssc_1.0.1-3.diff.gz
to pool/main/c/cssc/cssc_1.0.1-3.diff.gz
cssc_1.0.1-3.dsc
to pool/main/c/cssc/cssc_1.0.1-3.dsc
cssc_1.0.1-3_i386.deb
to pool/main/c/cssc/cssc_1.0.1-3_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cssc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 14:29:32 +0200
Source: cssc
Binary: cssc
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description:
cssc - Clone of the Unix SCCS revision-control system
Closes: 276131 330639
Changes:
cssc (1.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Applied patch for g++-3.4 (Closes: #276131).
* This uploads will allow rebuild with proper ABI on ia64 (Closes:
#330639).
* Updated FSF address in copyright file (lintian).
* Nuked 3 empty lines from sccs.1 (lintian).
* Switch to debhelper compat v4:
* added ${misc:Depends} to control file.
* Bumped Standards-Version to 3.6.2, no change.
Files:
be3ed5d2a4635066b4054d9dbe6784e2 572 devel extra cssc_1.0.1-3.dsc
56082e69257fcb752055ed3b3ebaea4d 5059
Bug#329090: util-vserver: barrier not working, but chroot escape does
reassign 329090 kernel-patch-vserver
thanks
Hello
Thanks a lot for your testing.
Micah could you test with 0.30.208-2 version of util-vserver (from unstable)
and a 2.6 kernel to see if you can remove all the problems?
See below why I would like you do that.
---
I have only tested with ext2 and ext3 on my systems on a 2.4.27 kernel
patched a long time ago. Do not remember when.
0.30.204-5sarge2 (sarge version, built on machine with no vserver support):
[000]. xattr related tests ...
[101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
[112]. [113]. [114]* [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
[121]* [122]* [123]. [124]* [199].
0.30.204-5sarge3 (sarge version recompiled on vserver machine):
[000]. xattr related tests ...
[101]. [102]. [103]* [104]* [106]* [108]. [109]*
[112]. [113]. [114]* [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
[121]* [122]* [123]. [124]* [199].
0.30.208-2 (unstable version, built on sarge host with no vserver support):
[000]. xattr related tests ...
[101]. [102]. [103]. [104]* [106]. [108]. [109].
[112]. [113]. [114]* [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
[121]. [122]* [123]. [124]* [199].
0.30.208-2sarge1 (unstable version rebuilt for sarge on vserver machine):
[000]. xattr related tests ...
[101]. [102]. [103]. [104]* [106]. [108]. [109].
[112]. [113]. [114]* [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
[121]. [122]* [123]. [124]* [199].
So my conclusion is that where you build the binary (if it is a i386 machine)
do not give any difference from a security point of view.
Now to your testing...
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 07:00:22PM -0400, micah wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
These bug reports are very confusing, I am performing my own tests to
help clarify.
Thanks a lot! It is really a big help.
Andrew Lee wrote:
The VCI shouldn't be none if you have setup /dev/loop4 correctly, I
did same thing and got same errors when I forgot to setup the /dev/
loop4 after a reboot.
No, VCI: none (unknown) is fine in 2.4 because 2.4 has no VCI info.
Here is what I did for create a loopback file and the run losetup:
# dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=1gb.testfile
# losetup /dev/loop4 1gb.testfs
Note: I have other loopback files running on /dev/loop{0,1,2,3}
already, so I use /dev/loop4 in my case.
Did similar but used lvm instead of loopback device.
The following is the results of my tests:
For all tests the following packages need to be installed:
xfsprogs jfsutils reiserfsprogs reiser4progs util-vserver
(0.30.204-5sarge2 unless otherwise noted)
Procedure is to do:
1. # dd bs=1024k count=1024 if=/dev/zero of=/home/1gb.testfile
2. # losetup /dev/loop4 /home/1gb.testfile
3. # mkdir /mnt2
On 2.6 kernels the following switches were used to test:
4. # ./testfs.sh-0.09 -vv -D /dev/loop4 -M /mnt2
Test 1:
Sarge kernel 2.6.8 (2.6.8-16) with debian package kernel-patch-vserver
(debian package version: 1.9.5.3, kernel patch:
patch-2.6.8-15-vs1.9.5.x-4.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine.
Results:
All the tests succeed on ext2/ext3/reiserfs, the following fail:
xfs: 103, 106, 113, 115, 117
jfs: 104, 114, 121, 122, 123, 124
Which means that this is a kernel patch problem as it fail on my system
with an older kernel patch.
This also mean that this is actually just a bug with 2.4 kernels.
Test 2:
Sarge kernel 2.6.8 (2.6.8-16) with debian kernel-patch-vserver (debian
package version: 1.9.5.4 (not in sarge), kernel patch
patch-2.6.8-15-vs1.9.5.x-5.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine.
Results:
Exactly the same as the results from Test 1
Test 3:
Sarge kernel 2.4.27 (2.4.27-10) with the debian kernel-patch-vserver
(debian package version: 1.9.5.3, kernel patch
patch-2.4.27-9-vs1.2.10-2.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine.
Results:
ext2/ext3 failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 114, 121, 122, 124
xfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 114, 115, 117, 121, 122, 124
reiserfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 114, 118, 119, 121, 122, 124
jfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 109, 112, 113, 114, 116, 118, 119, 121,
122, 123, 124
Get the same result. Think I have used a similar patch.
[103]* [104]* [106]* [109]* [114]* [121]* [122]* [124]*
Note: Bertl says this is a failure with the util-vserver tools, so I
perform the test again with util-vserver .208 from unstable:
Test 4:
Sarge kernel 2.4.27 (2.4.27-10) with the debian kernel-patch-vserver
(debian package version: 1.9.5.3, kernel patch
patch-2.4.27-9-vs1.2.10-2.diff.gz) applied on an i386 machine. Using
util-vserver tools from unstable (0.30.208-2)
ext2/ext3 failures: 104, 106, 114, 122, 124
xfs failures: 103, 104, 106, 114, 115, 117, 121, 122, 124
reiserfs failures: 104, 106, 114, 118, 119, 122, 124
jfs failures: 102, 103, 104, 106, 109, 112, 113, 114, 116, 118, 119,
121, 122, 123, 124
So with your testing and mine I come to the conclusion that some of the
tests are related to util-vserver and some are related to the kernel. As all
of them was possible to
Bug#332545: Re: Bug#332545: X error prevents wine startup
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:14:43PM -0400, Ove Kaaven wrote: Hmm, I've only upgraded my system partially since my last upload. Perhaps I need to do a full system upgrade and do a new build, then, can try that this weekend. But if someone could try to build the packages themselves and see if that works, though, that might be good. Building wine on a completely current sid (in a minimal chroot) does not solve the problem for me. Going back to 0.0.20050725-1 did. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things.Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332773: vlc: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: invalid cast from type 'const wxCharBuffer' to type 'char*'
Package: vlc Version: 0.8.4-svn20050920-3 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build on 64 bit arches with the following error: open.cpp: In function 'char* ProbeDVD(const wxChar*)': open.cpp:1336: error: invalid cast from type 'const wxCharBuffer' to type 'char*' open.cpp: In function 'char* ProbeCDDA(const wxChar*)': open.cpp:1406: error: invalid cast from type 'const wxCharBuffer' to type 'char*' open.cpp: In function 'char* ProbeVCD(const wxChar*)': open.cpp:1419: error: invalid cast from type 'const wxCharBuffer' to type 'char*' open.cpp: In member function 'void wxvlc::OpenDialog::OnSubsFileSettings(wxCommandEvent)': open.cpp:1768: warning: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision open.cpp:1774: warning: cast from 'void*' to 'int' loses precision make[7]: *** [libwxwidgets_plugin_a-open.o] Error 1 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329358: [bug #14619] find -perm +... broken in 4.2.25
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #14619 (project findutils): Might I suggest the following documentation approach for the man and info pages: -perm mode: exact match of set and unset bits in symbolic or numeric mode; includes symbolic modes with leading '+' but not with leading '-' -perm -mode: match all set bits (and ignore other bits) in symbolic or numeric mode -perm /mode: match any set bits (and ignore other bits) in symbolic or numeric mode -perm +mode: match any set bits (and ignore other bits) in numeric mode (use /mode for symbolic) Then include an example showing how to find a file that has all three read bits, at least one write bit, and no execute bits, in both numeric and symbolic representation: find . -perm -444 -perm +222 \! -perm /111 find . -perm -a+r -perm /a+w \! -perm /a+x ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=14619 ___ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#234863: Downgrading this bug
severity 234863 important thanks Hi, I've read the backlog and the upstream bug (which might be completely different bugs after all) and the status seems to be the following: - people have reported huge memory usage in 1.0, 1.4, and 2.0, but not in Debian for = 2.2 - the upstream report mentions non-Debian versions, and is marked as NEEDINFO - the memory consumption problem seems to be specific to IMAP and huge amount of messages I think this is enough to downgrade this bug to important, as the program is probably usable for most people. Cheers, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332775: ntop: FTBFS: non-PIC code to make shared lib.
Package: ntop
Version: 2:3.2rc1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on some arches because
it's not using PIC code to generate a shared lib.
On alpha you get:
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o: !samegp reloc against
symbol without .prologue: dumpXML
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
On amd64:
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o: relocation
R_X86_64_PC32against `dumpXML' can not be used when making a shared object;
recompile with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
It is getting build with -DPIC and -fPIC, so it must be something else.
During build, it shows the following warning:
xmldumpPlugin.c:52:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:53:2: warning: #warning Missing header files, disabling xmldump
plugin
xmldumpPlugin.c:54:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:55:2: warning: #warning FOR MOST USERS THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM
xmldumpPlugin.c:56:2: warning: #warning ntop will build and run just fine...
xmldumpPlugin.c:57:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:58:2: warning: #warning Why?
xmldumpPlugin.c:59:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:61:2: warning: #warning glibconfig.h unavailable
xmldumpPlugin.c:64:2: warning: #warning glib.h unavailable
xmldumpPlugin.c:67:2: warning: #warning gdome.h unavailable
xmldumpPlugin.c:72:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:73:2: warning: #warning ===
xmldumpPlugin.c:74:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:28: warning: 'dumpXML' used but never defined
During configure:
checking glib.h usability... no
checking glib.h presence... no
checking for glib.h... no
checking glibconfig.h usability... no
checking glibconfig.h presence... no
checking for glibconfig.h... no
checking gdome.h usability... no
checking gdome.h presence... no
checking for gdome.h... no
It seems to be using the following code in that case:
#ifndef MAKE_WITH_XMLDUMP
static int dumpXML(char * url) {
return(0);
}
#else
This problem seems to go away when using -O2, in which
case it's probably inlining it.
An other way to fix it would be not to call dumpXML() when
MAKE_WITH_XMLDUMP isn't defined. I've attached a patch
for it.
You could also just complete remove the dumpXML() in case
it's not defined.
Kurt
--- xmldumpPlugin.c.old 2005-10-08 16:25:07.760558536 +0200
+++ xmldumpPlugin.c 2005-10-08 16:29:19.279226640 +0200
@@ -486,8 +486,10 @@
return;
}
+#ifdef MAKE_WITH_XMLDUMP
/* Process it */
dumpXML(url);
+#endif
#if defined(PARM_FORK_CHILD_PROCESS) (!defined(WIN32))
if(myGlobals.childntoppid != 0)
Bug#292953: aime: FTBFS: Converts a string to an int.
found 292953 0.60.3-7.1
thanks
Hi,
It seems you didn't completly apply the patch, and it's now still
broken. It fails to build on 64 bit arches, but the code really
doesn't work on others either.
The part you didn't apply was editor.cpp's:
-fputc((int)\n,fp);
+fputc('\n',fp);
Note that it changes the string \n to a char '\n', which is
really what it should do. The string is just plain wrong.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: aime: FTBFS: Converts a string to an int.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 292953 0.60.3-7.1 Bug#292953: aime: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit specialization of 'LinkedNodeTYPE::LinkedNode(TYPE*)' must be introduced by 'template ' Bug marked as found in version 0.60.3-7.1. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: fixing tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 234863 - woody Bug#234863: evolution: The mail component eats memory till swap is gone then crashes Tags were: woody Tags removed: woody thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Downgrading this bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 234863 important Bug#234863: evolution: The mail component eats memory till swap is gone then crashes Severity set to `important'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332524: marked as done (xloadimage: Exploitable buffer overflow in NIFF loading code)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 07:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332524: fixed in xloadimage 4.1-15 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Oct 2005 22:06:55 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 06 15:06:55 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENdt9-dv-00; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:06:55 -0700 Received: from dslb-082-083-223-230.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.223.230] helo=localhost.localdomain) by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1ENdt4-0004TI-HZ for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:06:50 +0200 Received: from jmm by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ENdu0-0001NR-Ku; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:07:48 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Moritz Muehlenhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xloadimage: Exploitable buffer overflow in NIFF loading code X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:07:48 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.83.223.230 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: xloadimage Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole A report about several buffer overflows in the xloadimage code for processing NIFF images has been posted to Bugtraq. Please see http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/bugtraq0510/57.html for details and a demo exploit. Cheers, Moritz -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc1 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 332524-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 14:38:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 07:38:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOFk5-0001AU-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 07:32:05 -0700 From: James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332524: fixed in xloadimage 4.1-15 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 07:32:05 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xloadimage Source-Version: 4.1-15 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xloadimage, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xloadimage_4.1-15.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-15.diff.gz xloadimage_4.1-15.dsc to pool/main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-15.dsc xloadimage_4.1-15_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-15_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. James Troup [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated xloadimage package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 04:22:14 +0100 Source: xloadimage Binary: xloadimage Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.1-15
Bug#315120: (no subject)
hi, what about this bug? no new package in the wild? regards nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org $ route add default roma.it pgpcytwxRfIvi.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#319561: (no subject)
Hi, what about including the patch in the package? Regards Nico -- Nico Golde - JAB: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GPG: 0x73647CFF http://www.ngolde.de | http://www.muttng.org | http://grml.org $ route add default roma.it pgpp4x42zzzNW.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#324056: FTBFS: Incompatible with GCC 4.0
Hello On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 12:34:07AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: Howdy, Sorry for the delayed response: I missed your previous email. It appears that you're right: I should have used -1.0 instead of 1.0. Ok, thanks. Regards, // Ola -- Matt -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332622: exult - fails to build
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 03:02:22PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 02:49:47PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: Are there any pressing technical needs to do so? It violates the policy, as clean can't restore the original value. which original value? Could you be a bit more verbose? As far as I can tell, debian/files is in the orig tarball. It gets cleaned in the clean: rule by dh_clean early during the build process and then does not hurt anymore. dpkg-source then notices that it got removed and excempts it from the .diff.gz. Which part of policy are you referring to, exactly? Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332682: vnc4 - don't build with gcc 4.0
Hello
Ok. I'll try to build the 4.1 version and see if that works better.
It will take some time as I have to integrate x.org as well and it is not
trivial.
Regards,
// Ola
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 10:39:09PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: vnc4
Version: 4.0-8
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of vnc4_4.0-8 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 42
[...]
c++ -I.. -DHAVE_VSNPRINTF -O2 -Wall -DPIC -fPIC -c HTTPServer.cxx
.../rdr/Exception.h:27: warning: 'struct rdr::Exception' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
.../rdr/Exception.h:44: warning: 'struct rdr::SystemException' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
.../rdr/Exception.h:49: warning: 'struct rdr::TimedOut' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
.../rdr/Exception.h:53: warning: 'struct rdr::EndOfStream' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/stl_bvector.h:
In member function 'void std::vectorbool,
_Alloc::_M_insert_range(std::_Bit_iterator, _ForwardIterator,
_ForwardIterator, std::forward_iterator_tag)':
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/stl_bvector.h:542:
error: expected unqualified-id before '(' token
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/stl_bvector.h:
In member function 'void std::vectorbool,
_Alloc::_M_fill_insert(std::_Bit_iterator, size_t, bool)':
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/stl_bvector.h:889:
error: expected unqualified-id before '(' token
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/vector.tcc:
In member function 'void std::vector_Tp,
_Alloc::_M_fill_insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iteratortypename
_Alloc::pointer, std::vector_Tp, _Alloc , size_t, const _Tp)':
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/vector.tcc:353:
error: expected unqualified-id before '(' token
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/vector.tcc:
In member function 'void std::vector_Tp,
_Alloc::_M_range_insert(__gnu_cxx::__normal_iteratortypename
_Alloc::pointer, std::vector_Tp, _Alloc , _ForwardIterator,
_ForwardIterator, std::forward_iterator_tag)':
/usr/lib/gcc/s390-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/vector.tcc:452:
error: expected unqualified-id before '(' token
.../rfb/ImageGetter.h: At global scope:
.../rfb/ImageGetter.h:24: warning: 'class rfb::ImageGetter' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
.../rfb/ColourMap.h:29: warning: 'class rfb::ColourMap' has virtual
functions but non-virtual destructor
.../rdr/FdInStream.h:30: warning: 'class rdr::FdInStreamBlockCallback' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
.../network/Socket.h:69: warning: 'class network::ConnectionFilter' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
.../network/Socket.h:95: warning: 'struct network::SocketException' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
make[2]: *** [HTTPServer.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/vnc4-4.0/rfb'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/vnc4-4.0'
make: *** [build-arch-stamp] Error 2
**
Build finished at 20051006-1125
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Bastian
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332775: ntop: FTBFS: non-PIC code to make shared lib.
Hello
Thanks a lot for the patch. Will be applied soon.
Regards,
// Ola
On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 04:33:42PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: ntop
Version: 2:3.2rc1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on some arches because
it's not using PIC code to generate a shared lib.
On alpha you get:
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o: !samegp reloc against
symbol without .prologue: dumpXML
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
On amd64:
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o: relocation
R_X86_64_PC32against `dumpXML' can not be used when making a shared object;
recompile with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
It is getting build with -DPIC and -fPIC, so it must be something else.
During build, it shows the following warning:
xmldumpPlugin.c:52:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:53:2: warning: #warning Missing header files, disabling
xmldump
plugin
xmldumpPlugin.c:54:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:55:2: warning: #warning FOR MOST USERS THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM
xmldumpPlugin.c:56:2: warning: #warning ntop will build and run just fine...
xmldumpPlugin.c:57:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:58:2: warning: #warning Why?
xmldumpPlugin.c:59:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:61:2: warning: #warning glibconfig.h unavailable
xmldumpPlugin.c:64:2: warning: #warning glib.h unavailable
xmldumpPlugin.c:67:2: warning: #warning gdome.h unavailable
xmldumpPlugin.c:72:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:73:2: warning: #warning
===
xmldumpPlugin.c:74:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:28: warning: 'dumpXML' used but never defined
During configure:
checking glib.h usability... no
checking glib.h presence... no
checking for glib.h... no
checking glibconfig.h usability... no
checking glibconfig.h presence... no
checking for glibconfig.h... no
checking gdome.h usability... no
checking gdome.h presence... no
checking for gdome.h... no
It seems to be using the following code in that case:
#ifndef MAKE_WITH_XMLDUMP
static int dumpXML(char * url) {
return(0);
}
#else
This problem seems to go away when using -O2, in which
case it's probably inlining it.
An other way to fix it would be not to call dumpXML() when
MAKE_WITH_XMLDUMP isn't defined. I've attached a patch
for it.
You could also just complete remove the dumpXML() in case
it's not defined.
Kurt
--- xmldumpPlugin.c.old 2005-10-08 16:25:07.760558536 +0200
+++ xmldumpPlugin.c 2005-10-08 16:29:19.279226640 +0200
@@ -486,8 +486,10 @@
return;
}
+#ifdef MAKE_WITH_XMLDUMP
/* Process it */
dumpXML(url);
+#endif
#if defined(PARM_FORK_CHILD_PROCESS) (!defined(WIN32))
if(myGlobals.childntoppid != 0)
--
- Ola Lundqvist ---
/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug 332683 is forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711 ..., tagging 332683
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 forwarded 332683 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711 Bug#332683: gcc-snapshot - fails to build Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR23711. retitle 332683 [PR 23711] [4.1 regression] [s390] bootstrap error in libjava (ICE in fixup_eh_region_note) Bug#332683: gcc-snapshot - fails to build Changed Bug title. tags 332683 upstream fixed-upstream Bug#332683: [PR 23711] [4.1 regression] [s390] bootstrap error in libjava (ICE in fixup_eh_region_note) There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332782: release-notes: Where's the license?
Package: release-notes Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 The Debian documentation policy (http://www.debian.org/doc/docpolicy) reads: | All manuals of the Debian Documentation Project (DDP) will be released | under DFSG-compliant licenses On the other hand the _Release Notes_ seem to be released with no license at all (that means All Rights Reserved, under current copyright laws!). _Release Notes_ should be licensed in a DFSG-free manner: for instance under the GNU GPL v2 license. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.31 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#320818: marked as done (bigloo: FTBFS: jigloo.java:0: error: Can't find default package 'java.lang'.)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:39:58 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line bigloo now builds on amd64 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2005 18:49:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 01 11:49:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.59] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DzfMF-0007kz-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:49:51 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id D172722414E for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 20:49:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775FD9.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.217]) by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FA92240F4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 20:49:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6DADC26136; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:49:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 20:49:50 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bigloo: FTBFS: jigloo.java:0: error: Can't find default package 'java.lang'. Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: bigloo Version: 2.6f+2.7a-050721-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: gcj --main=jigloo -o build-tree/bigloo2.7a/bin/jigloo build-tree/bigloo2.7a/jigloo/jigloo.java build-tree/bigloo2.7a/jigloo/jigloo.java:0: error: Can't find default package 'java.lang'. Check the CLASSPATH environment variable and the access to the arch ives 1 error make: *** [stampdir/build-arch] Error 1 Kurt --- Received: (at 320818-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 15:37:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 08:37:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOGlO-0002QB-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 08:37:30 -0700 Received: from nan92-1-81-57-214-146 (nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.214.146]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F7234B98 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:37:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwitch by nan92-1-81-57-214-146 with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EOGnm-ct-I9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 17:39:58 +0200 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:39:58 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: bigloo now builds on amd64 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 As of bigloo 2.6f+2.7a-051005-1, the amd64 build is successful, so I'm closing this bug. -- Yann Dirson[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Debian-related: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Debian GNU/Linux: | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis http://ydirson.free.fr/| Check http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of evolution-data-server 1.2.3-4.2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 331570 + fixed Bug#331570: Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 331571 + fixed Bug#331571: Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332791: error: `PEM_F_DEF_CALLBACK' undeclared
Package: apache2 Version: 2.0.54-5 Severity: grave Apache2 no longer builds with new openssl-0.9.8 package. /var/local/apache2/apache2-2.0.54/build-tree/apache2/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_pphrase.c: In function `ssl_pphrase_Handle_CB': /var/local/apache2/apache2-2.0.54/build-tree/apache2/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_pphrase.c:684: error: `PEM_F_DEF_CALLBACK' undeclared (first use in this function) /var/local/apache2/apache2-2.0.54/build-tree/apache2/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_pphrase.c:684: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /var/local/apache2/apache2-2.0.54/build-tree/apache2/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_pphrase.c:684: error: for each function it appears in.) make[4]: *** [ssl_engine_pphrase.slo] Error 1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Let's remove one or two packages...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 328583 ftp.debian.org Bug#328583: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xa+cv' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328583 xa+cv -- RoQA; rc-buggy, unused, very old Bug#328583: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328583 normal Bug#328583: xa+cv -- RoQA; rc-buggy, unused, very old Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328592 ftp.debian.org Bug#328592: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `libsoap-perl' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328592 libsoap-perl -- RoQA; unused, upstream-dead, out of date Bug#328592: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328592 normal Bug#328592: libsoap-perl -- RoQA; unused, upstream-dead, out of date Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328594 ftp.debian.org Bug#328594: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `gfont' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328594 gfont -- RoQA; unused, non-free Bug#328594: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328594 normal Bug#328594: gfont -- RoQA; unused, non-free Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328600 ftp.debian.org Bug#328600: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `perl2html' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328600 perl2html -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Bug#328600: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328600 normal Bug#328600: perl2html -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328601 ftp.debian.org Bug#328601: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `tkirc' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328601 tkirc -- RoQA; unused, out of date, alternatives available Bug#328601: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328601 normal Bug#328601: tkirc -- RoQA; unused, out of date, alternatives available Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328662 ftp.debian.org Bug#328662: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `libdebconf-ruby' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328662 libdeconf-ruby -- RoQA; unused, out of date, useless Bug#328662: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328662 normal Bug#328662: libdeconf-ruby -- RoQA; unused, out of date, useless Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328667 ftp.debian.org Bug#328667: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `rx320' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328667 rx320 -- RoQA; unused, out of date Bug#328667: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328667 normal Bug#328667: rx320 -- RoQA; unused, out of date Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328669 ftp.debian.org Bug#328669: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `bnlib' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328669 bnlib -- RoQA; unused, upstream dead, old Bug#328669: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328669 normal Bug#328669: bnlib -- RoQA; unused, upstream dead, old Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328792 ftp.debian.org Bug#328792: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `lexmark7000linux' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328792 lexmark7000linux -- RoQA; unused, useless, old Bug#328792: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328792 normal Bug#328792: lexmark7000linux -- RoQA; unused, useless, old Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328796 ftp.debian.org Bug#328796: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `nonlock' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328796 nonlock -- RoQA; unused, old, upstream dead, alternatives available Bug#328796: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328796 normal Bug#328796: nonlock -- RoQA; unused, old, upstream dead, alternatives available Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328799 ftp.debian.org Bug#328799: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `xtet42' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328799 xtet42 -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Bug#328799: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328799 normal Bug#328799: xtet42 -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328800 ftp.debian.org Bug#328800: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `lxtools' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328800 lxtools -- RoQA; unused, upstream dead, old Bug#328800: very old package, should this be removed? Changed Bug title. severity 328800 normal Bug#328800: lxtools -- RoQA; unused, upstream dead, old Severity set to `normal'. reassign 328803 ftp.debian.org Bug#328803: very old package, should this be removed? Bug reassigned from package `scandetd' to `ftp.debian.org'. retitle 328803 scandetd --
Processed: foo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag #332773 +fixed-upstream Bug#332773: vlc: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: invalid cast from type 'const wxCharBuffer' to type 'char*' There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-upstream merge #332773 #332282 Bug#332282: vlc: fails to build from source (problems in wxgui module) Bug#332773: vlc: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: invalid cast from type 'const wxCharBuffer' to type 'char*' Merged 332282 332773. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#324056: marked as done (FTBFS: Incompatible with GCC 4.0)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 10:02:18 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#324056: fixed in steghide 0.5.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2005 01:14:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 19 18:14:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E6Hw5-ZJ-00; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:14:13 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7K1ECUp046411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 18:14:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E6Ar6-00013V-Fl for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:40:36 -0700 Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:40:36 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS: Incompatible with GCC 4.0 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=98e8jtXdkpgskNou Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1034/Thu Aug 18 13:07:58 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --98e8jtXdkpgskNou Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Disposition: inline --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: steghide Version: 0.5.1-5 Severity: serious Tags: patch steghide fails to build because it contains a number of incompatibilities with GCC 4.0: if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DLOCALEDIR=3D\/usr/share/locale\ = -O2 -Wall -MT AuFile.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/AuFile.Tpo \ -c -o AuFile.o `test -f 'AuFile.cc' || echo './'`AuFile.cc; \ then mv .deps/AuFile.Tpo .deps/AuFile.Po; \ else rm -f .deps/AuFile.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi CvrStgObject.h:40: warning: 'class CvrStgObject' has virtual functions bu= t non-virtual destructor SampleValue.h: In member function 'size_t SampleValueHash::operator()(con= st SampleValue*) const': SampleValue.h:166: error: 'hash' is not a member of 'sgi' SampleValue.h:166: error: expected primary-expression before '' token SampleValue.h:166: error: 'h' was not declared in this scope AudioData.h: At global scope: AudioData.h:37: warning: 'class AudioData' has virtual functions but non-= virtual destructor AuData.h:29: error: explicit specialization of 'BYTE AudioDataImplAuMuLa= w, BYTE, AudioSampleValueAuMuLaw, BYTE ::readValue(BinaryIO*) const' mus= t be introduced by 'template ' AuData.h:29: error: template-id 'readValue' for 'BYTE AudioDataImplAuM= uLaw, BYTE, AudioSampleValueAuMuLaw, BYTE ::readValue(BinaryIO*) const' = does not match any template declaration AuData.h:29: error: invalid function declaration AuData.h:30: error: explicit specialization of 'void AudioDataImplAuMuLa= w, BYTE, AudioSampleValueAuMuLaw, BYTE ::writeValue(BinaryIO*, BYTE) con= st' must be introduced by 'template ' AuData.h:30: error: template-id 'writeValue' for 'void AudioDataImplAu= MuLaw, BYTE, AudioSampleValueAuMuLaw, BYTE ::writeValue(BinaryIO*, BYTE)= const' does not match any template declaration AuData.h:30: error: invalid function declaration AuData.h:34: error: explicit specialization of 'SBYTE AudioDataImplAuPCM= 8, SBYTE, AudioSampleValueAuPCM8, SBYTE ::readValue(BinaryIO*) const' mu= st be introduced by 'template ' AuData.h:34: error: template-id 'readValue' for 'SBYTE AudioDataImplAu= PCM8, SBYTE, AudioSampleValueAuPCM8, SBYTE ::readValue(BinaryIO*) const'= does not match any template declaration AuData.h:34: error: invalid function declaration AuData.h:35: error: explicit specialization of 'void AudioDataImplAuPCM8= , SBYTE, AudioSampleValueAuPCM8, SBYTE ::writeValue(BinaryIO*, SBYTE) co= nst' must be introduced by 'template ' AuData.h:35: error: template-id
Bug#331571: marked as done (Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:08:07 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in NMU of evolution-data-server 1.2.3-4.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 03:20:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 20:20:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMdMB-0005y4-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 20:20:44 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j943KgUx047762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 20:20:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EMWuC-0001WJ-7d for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:27:24 -0700 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:27:24 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1109/Mon Oct 3 15:06:28 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libcamel1.2-dev Version: 1.2.3-4 Severity: serious libcamel-1.2.la and libcamel-provider-1.2.la both include libdb-4.2.la in their dependency_libs, but libcamel1.2-dev does not depend on libdb4.2-dev. This causes contact-lookup-applet to fail to build. --=20 Matt --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDQZQrfNdgYxVXvBARAp9iAJ9B9n+iWEpS3x4D/IZzdJkEYGXBCACcCasf xii9rdkCa48olGe7rPHu7o0= =5MT2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu-- --- Received: (at 331571-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 17:08:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 10:08:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOIB7-0001Aj-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 10:08:09 -0700 Received: from siemens.dooz.org (levallois.dooz.org [81.57.180.178]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A210A2872B; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by siemens.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 22CCAF4F8; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:08:07 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of evolution-data-server 1.2.3-4.2 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Version: 1.2.3-4.2 Hi, These bugs were closed in version 1.2.3-4.2 of evolution-data-server, see below. Cheers, On Sat, Oct 08, 2005, Loic Minier wrote: tag 331570 + fixed tag 331571 + fixed =20 quit =20 This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. =20 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:42:11 +0200 Source: evolution-data-server Binary: libcamel1.2-0 libedataserver1.2-dev libedata-cal1.2-dev libecal=
Bug#331570: marked as done (Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:08:07 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Fixed in NMU of evolution-data-server 1.2.3-4.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 03:20:37 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 03 20:20:37 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMdM5-0005xU-00; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 20:20:37 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (pool-71-104-166-233.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.166.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j943KaJQ047759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 20:20:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EMWvu-0001WS-Av for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 03 Oct 2005 13:29:10 -0700 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:29:10 -0700 From: Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Missing dependency on libdb4.2-dev Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1109/Mon Oct 3 15:06:28 2005 on zoot.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libebook1.2-dev Version: 1.2.3-4 Severity: serious libebook-1.2.la includes libdb-4.2.la in dependency_libs, but libebook1.2-dev does not depend on libdb4.2-dev. This causes contact-lookup-applet to fail to build. --=20 Matt --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDQZSVfNdgYxVXvBARAvjIAKC1bLgH6mju05mlOxqehknBijpaDwCeN787 tZPrXLNBeTMqWYq0BwnQqAY= =rfrb -END PGP SIGNATURE- --rJwd6BRFiFCcLxzm-- --- Received: (at 331570-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 17:08:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 10:08:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOIB7-0001Aj-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 10:08:09 -0700 Received: from siemens.dooz.org (levallois.dooz.org [81.57.180.178]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A210A2872B; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by siemens.dooz.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 22CCAF4F8; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:08:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:08:07 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of evolution-data-server 1.2.3-4.2 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 1.2.3-4.2 Hi, These bugs were closed in version 1.2.3-4.2 of evolution-data-server, see below. Cheers, On Sat, Oct 08, 2005, Loic Minier wrote: tag 331570 + fixed tag 331571 + fixed =20 quit =20 This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. =20 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 17:42:11 +0200 Source: evolution-data-server Binary: libcamel1.2-0 libedataserver1.2-dev libedata-cal1.2-dev libecal= 1.2-dev libegroupwise1.2-5 libedata-cal1.2-1 libcamel1.2-dev
Bug#332795: locales: post-install fails with *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x088e9208 ***
Package: locales Version: 2.3.5-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable when updating locales to version 2.3.5-6 it failes after generating the locales: --- jashugan:/home/attila# apt-get install locales Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done locales is already the newest version. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 317 not upgraded. 1 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used. Setting up locales (2.3.5-6) ... Generating locales (this might take a while)... de_DE.ISO-8859-1... done Generation complete. *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x088e9208 *** dpkg: error processing locales (--configure): subprocess post-installation script killed by signal (Aborted), core dumped Errors were encountered while processing: locales E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) --- I tried other locales and it does seem to be unrelated. As i have no idea what the error means i could not really debug it, if you need more informations please tell me how to aquire them. Attila Kinali -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.5 Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages locales depends on: ii debconf 1.4.52 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 [glibc-2.3.5-3] 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an locales recommends no packages. -- debconf information: perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = de_CH are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale (C). locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory * locales/default_environment_locale: None * locales/locales_to_be_generated: de_DE ISO-8859-1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332545: Same
Same problem here with Warcraft III and a certain Nullsoft installer. wine regedit and winemine for example do work. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332791: Acknowledgement (error: `PEM_F_DEF_CALLBACK' undeclared )
Here is a patch to fix the problem: --- httpd-2.0.54.orig/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h 2005-02-04 12:21:18.0 -0800 +++ httpd-2.0.54/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h 2005-07-06 08:50:38.46875 -0700 @@ -24,6 +24,12 @@ #ifdef OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER +#if (OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER = 0x0090800fL) +#ifndef PEM_F_DEF_CALLBACK +#define PEM_F_DEF_CALLBACK PEM_F_PEM_DEF_CALLBACK +#endif +#endif + /* * rsa sslc uses incomplete types for most structures * so we macroize for OpenSSL those which cannot be dereferenced -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: FTP USER buffer overflow (CAN-2005-2239)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 318286 sarge Bug#318286: FTP USER buffer overflow (CAN-2005-2239) Tags were: security Tags added: sarge thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332799: FTBFS/mipsel: Please stop building java bindings for mipsel
Package: subversion Version: 1.1.4-2 Severity: serious Because gcj nor jikes are able to compile java code on mipsel, kaffe unfortunately needed to be dropped for mipsel. Please stop building the java bindings for mipsel, and add a [!mipsel] qualification to your kaffe build-dependency. When you've made that upload, please reassign this bug to to ftp.debian.org so that the mipsel bindings of subversion as they are in the archive now can be dropped. Please note that mips is in a similar situation, it's likely that kaffe will stop supporting mips too in the near future. So you could stop building java bindings for mips too, if you wish -- or alternatively wait and see, it's not sure yet. --Jeroen -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages subversion depends on: ii db4.2-util 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Utilities ii libapr02.0.54-5 the Apache Portable Runtime ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [ ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li ii libldap2 2.1.30-8 OpenLDAP libraries ii libneon24 0.24.7.dfsg-2 An HTTP and WebDAV client library ii libssl0.9.70.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries ii libsvn01.1.4-2 shared libraries used by Subversio ii libxml22.6.16-7 GNOME XML library ii patch 2.5.9-2 Apply a diff file to an original ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4.sarge.2 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332800: FTBFS/mipsel: kaffe no longer supports mipsel
Package: bigloo Severity: serious Because gcj nor jikes are able to compile java code on mipsel, kaffe unfortunately needed to be dropped for mipsel. Please stop building the java bindings for mipsel, and add a [!mipsel] qualification to your kaffe build-dependency. When you've made that upload, please reassign this bug to to ftp.debian.org so that the mipsel versions of bigloo-backend-jvm as they are in the archive now can be dropped. Please note that mips is in a similar situation, it's likely that kaffe will stop supporting mips too in the near future. So you could stop building java bindings for mips too, if you wish -- or alternatively wait and see, it's not sure yet. Thanks, --Jeroen -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#331293: at won't start any job at all : failure with pam
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 331293 libc6 Bug#331293: at won't start any job at all : failure with pam Bug reassigned from package `at' to `libc6'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331293: at won't start any job at all : failure with pam
reassign 331293 libc6 thanks General timeline: libc is upgraded, at keeps running fine. libselinux is rebuilt, requiring GLIBC_2.3.4 libpam is rebuilt against the new libselinux At this point, at entirely fails because the libc it was started with isn't 2.3.4 or higher. Rather than continually updating a list of things one might have to restart, we should probably look at a tool that will restart all processes that have a library open that is no longer on disk. Oct 2 22:59:00 dino atd[18647]: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_unix.so) Oct 2 22:59:00 dino atd[18647]: PAM [dlerror: /lib/libselinux.so.1: symbol regexec, version GLIBC_2.3.4 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference] Have you restarted at since upgrading to a 2.3.5 libc? No, and this was the issue. I've seen that yesterday just after, but as the postinst script of the libc restarts a few services, and 'at' is not uncommon, I supposed that it would have been restarted automatically. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332815: adduser: --disabled-passwd and --disabled-login non-functional
Package: adduser Version: 3.70 Severity: serious Justification: makes package unsuitable for release in maintainer's opinion In the experimental versions of adduser, the options --disabled-login and --disabled-passwd have been inadvertently renamed to --disabled_login and --disabled_password. This is a bug. They will be renamed back in 3.71. Greetings Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-zgsrv Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages adduser depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii passwd1:4.0.12-6 change and administer password and ii perl-base 5.8.7-5The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis adduser recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332290: horde3: Application is in a severely insecure state during configuration
Hello On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:17:37PM -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote: Package: horde3 Version: 3.0.5-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole As part of the installation procedure in README.Debian, you are told to configure horde3 via a web interface. This is done using an Administrator account which requires no password. In the time that the application is in this state, anyone who goes to the website is automatically logged in as Administrator with no password. The Administrative account is granted access to 3 tools that look extremely dangerous: cmdshell.php sqlshell.php and phpshell.php. I didn't determine what phpshell.php does. However when i used the cmdshell.php I was able to execute arbitrary commands as the www-user. For instance I was able to successfully execute cat /etc/passwd. This is horribly unacceptable. Ohh my! I would recommend that cmdshell.php and sqlshell.php be removed. They are a much bigger security hole than they are worth. I don't know what phpshell.php does, but I wouldn't be suprised if it were in this same category. I agree that these should be moved to somewhere else. I agree that cmdshell and sqlshell is really dangerous and was not aware of them. I also would recommend that a password be required do use the Administration interface. The administration thing will be kept there as it do not have any write permission to any of the configuration files. Or do you have a good suggestion on how to have a password that is not predefined. To set a random one? Regards, // Ola -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages horde3 depends on: ii apache [httpd] 1.3.33-7versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi-2 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli [phpapi-20020918] 4:4.3.10-15 command-line interpreter for the p ii php4-domxml 4:4.3.10-15 XMLv2 module for php4 ii php4-pear4:4.3.10-15 PEAR - PHP Extension and Applicati ii php4-pear-log1.6.0-1.1 Log module for PEAR Versions of packages horde3 recommends: ii logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility pn php-date none (no description available) pn php-file none (no description available) pn php-mail-mime none (no description available) pn php-services-weather none (no description available) pn php4-gd | php4-gd2none (no description available) pn php4-mcrypt none (no description available) pn php4-mysql | php4-pgsql | php none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332775: marked as done (ntop: FTBFS: non-PIC code to make shared lib.)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:17:06 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#332775: fixed in ntop 2:3.2rc1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 14:33:43 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 07:33:43 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from asia.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.74]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOFlf-0001Ox-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 07:33:43 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C0FF38287
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 16:33:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74])
by asia.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5379A381FA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 16:33:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 3622026136; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 16:33:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 16:33:42 +0200
From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ntop: FTBFS: non-PIC code to make shared lib.
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=+QahgC5+KEYLbs62
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--+QahgC5+KEYLbs62
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: ntop
Version: 2:3.2rc1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
Your package is failing to build on some arches because
it's not using PIC code to generate a shared lib.
On alpha you get:
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o: !samegp reloc against
symbol without .prologue: dumpXML
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
On amd64:
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/libxmldumpPlugin_la-xmldumpPlugin.o: relocation
R_X86_64_PC32against `dumpXML' can not be used when making a shared object;
recompile with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
It is getting build with -DPIC and -fPIC, so it must be something else.
During build, it shows the following warning:
xmldumpPlugin.c:52:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:53:2: warning: #warning Missing header files, disabling xmldump
plugin
xmldumpPlugin.c:54:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:55:2: warning: #warning FOR MOST USERS THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM
xmldumpPlugin.c:56:2: warning: #warning ntop will build and run just fine...
xmldumpPlugin.c:57:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:58:2: warning: #warning Why?
xmldumpPlugin.c:59:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:61:2: warning: #warning glibconfig.h unavailable
xmldumpPlugin.c:64:2: warning: #warning glib.h unavailable
xmldumpPlugin.c:67:2: warning: #warning gdome.h unavailable
xmldumpPlugin.c:72:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:73:2: warning: #warning ===
xmldumpPlugin.c:74:2: warning: #warning
xmldumpPlugin.c:28: warning: 'dumpXML' used but never defined
During configure:
checking glib.h usability... no
checking glib.h presence... no
checking for glib.h... no
checking glibconfig.h usability... no
checking glibconfig.h presence... no
checking for glibconfig.h... no
checking gdome.h usability... no
checking gdome.h presence... no
checking for gdome.h... no
It seems to be using the following code in that case:
#ifndef MAKE_WITH_XMLDUMP
static int dumpXML(char * url) {
return(0);
}
#else
This problem seems to go away when using -O2, in which
case it's probably inlining it.
An other way to fix it would be not to call dumpXML() when
MAKE_WITH_XMLDUMP isn't defined. I've attached a patch
for it.
You could also just complete remove the dumpXML() in case
it's not defined.
Kurt
--+QahgC5+KEYLbs62
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=ntop-xmldump.diff
--- xmldumpPlugin.c.old 2005-10-08 16:25:07.760558536 +0200
+++ xmldumpPlugin.c 2005-10-08 16:29:19.279226640 +0200
@@ -486,8 +486,10 @@
return;
}
+#ifdef MAKE_WITH_XMLDUMP
/* Process it */
dumpXML(url);
+#endif
Bug#314976: NMU in DELAYED-5
Hello On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:25:23PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: hello, i just uploaded directvnc_0.7.5-6.1 to the DELAYED-5 upload queue on gluck. it is built against the latest libdirectfb (0.9.22-7). patch is attached. Thanks. It would be nice if you could check what went wrong with the autobuilding on s390 as you seem to have made some changes to the dependencies and it complain on some X header file. Regards, // Ola ... jonas diff -rNu directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/changelog directvnc-0.7.5/debian/changelog --- directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/changelog 2005-10-03 17:23:48.0 +0200 +++ directvnc-0.7.5/debian/changelog 2005-10-03 17:23:28.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +directvnc (0.7.5-6.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * rebuild against libdirectfb-0.9-22 for transition (closes: #314976) + * bumped standards-version to 3.6.2 (no changes needed) + * updated fsf address to make lintian happy + * change xlibs-dev Build-Depends to x-dev, after searching docs and source +i believe that only some x headers are needed to build. + + -- Jonas Meurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 3 Oct 2005 17:22:37 +0200 + directvnc (0.7.5-6) unstable; urgency=low * Documented display size restriction, closes: #248009. diff -rNu directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/control directvnc-0.7.5/debian/control --- directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/control 2005-10-03 17:23:48.0 +0200 +++ directvnc-0.7.5/debian/control2005-10-03 17:22:31.0 +0200 @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ Section: misc Priority: optional Maintainer: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libdirectfb-dev (= 0.9.20-1), zlib1g-dev, libjpeg62-dev, pkg-config, xlibs-dev -Standards-Version: 3.5.10 +Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), libdirectfb-dev (= 0.9.22-7), zlib1g-dev, libjpeg62-dev, pkg-config, x-dev +Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: directvnc Architecture: any diff -rNu directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/copyright directvnc-0.7.5/debian/copyright --- directvnc-0.7.5.orig/debian/copyright 2005-10-03 17:23:48.0 +0200 +++ directvnc-0.7.5/debian/copyright 2005-10-03 16:45:35.0 +0200 @@ -29,5 +29,5 @@ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License with your Debian GNU/Linux system, in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL, or with the debarchiver source package as the file COPYING. If not, write to the Free - Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA - 02111-1307, USA. + Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA + 02110-1301, USA. -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#330907: gnome-pty-helper foo
# downgrading the clone too severity 330907 normal thanks On ven, oct 07, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote: severity 329156 normal thanks dude Loïc Minier wrote: Hi, On Fri, Oct 07, 2005, Martin Schulze wrote: Could somebody explain the security implication for me? You can record in the utmp/wtmp logs something which is wrong, for example that an user is currently connected to a display while he isn't. I'm not the one to argue with though. Ok, so unless somebody proves us wrong we don't consider this a security problem. Regards, Joey -- Everybody talks about it, but nobody does anything about it! -- Mark Twain Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332289: permissions on /etc/horde/horde3/* are too lax
Hello On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:16:23PM -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote: Package: horde3 Version: 3.0.5-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole In the README.Debian, in section 6. it is recommended that the end user executes: chown root.www config/* chmod 0440 config/* becuase the Some of Horde's configuration files contain passwords which local users could use to access your database. This is somehting that should be done by the maintainer scripts and not left up to the end user to do. I'm not sure that I agree with you here. In order to add a password there you have to change the permissions of these files anyway. Regards, // Ola -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages horde3 depends on: ii apache [httpd] 1.3.33-7versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi-2 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli [phpapi-20020918] 4:4.3.10-15 command-line interpreter for the p ii php4-domxml 4:4.3.10-15 XMLv2 module for php4 ii php4-pear4:4.3.10-15 PEAR - PHP Extension and Applicati ii php4-pear-log1.6.0-1.1 Log module for PEAR Versions of packages horde3 recommends: ii logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility pn php-date none (no description available) pn php-file none (no description available) pn php-mail-mime none (no description available) pn php-services-weather none (no description available) pn php4-gd | php4-gd2none (no description available) pn php4-mcrypt none (no description available) pn php4-mysql | php4-pgsql | php none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: gnome-pty-helper foo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # downgrading the clone too severity 330907 normal Bug#330907: [CAN-2005-0023] /usr/sbin/gnome-pty-helper: writes arbitrary utmp records Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332677: marked as done (abiword - build-depends against removed package)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:32:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332677: fixed in abiword 2.4.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2005 19:58:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 07 12:58:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mobilewave.waldi.eu.org [82.139.201.22] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENyM0-0006jg-00; Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:58:04 -0700 Received: by mobilewave.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B855D183FC; Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:57:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:57:47 +0200 From: Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: abiword - build-depends against removed package Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: abiword Version: 2.2.10-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of abiword_2.2.10-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper ( 4.0.0), dpatch, libaiksaurus-1.2-dev, libaiksaurusgtk-1.2-dev, libenchant-dev (= 1.1.6-1), libfribidi-dev, libgal2.2-dev, libglib2.0-dev, libgnome2-dev, libgnomeprintui2.2-dev, libgsf-1-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libgucharmap4-dev, libjpeg62-dev, libgnomeui-dev, libots-dev, libperl-dev, libpng12-dev, libpsiconv-dev, libpspell-dev (= 0.60.3-3), libreadline5-dev | libreadline-dev, librsvg2-dev, libwmf-dev, libwpd8-dev (= 0.8.2-2), python2.3-dev ** Filtered missing central deps that are dependencies of or provide build-deps: libbz2-dev, libexpat1-dev (= 1.95.6), libfreetype6-dev (= 2.1.5-1), libncurses5-dev (= 5.3.20030510-1), libpopt-dev (= 1.7), libreadline4-dev (= 4.3-1), libxml2-dev (= 2.6.3), xlibs-dev ( 4.1.0), zlib1g-dev (= 1:1.2.1) Warning: The following central src deps are (probably) missing: sharutils [...] E: Package libgal2.2-dev has no installation candidate Package libgal2.2-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source apt-get failed. Package installation failed libgal2.2-dev is only available in stable. Bastian --- Received: (at 332677-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 18:38:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 11:38:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOJUQ-BK-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:32:10 -0700 From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332677: fixed in abiword 2.4.1-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:32:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: abiword Source-Version: 2.4.1-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of abiword, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: abiword-common_2.4.1-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/abiword/abiword-common_2.4.1-1_all.deb abiword-gnome_2.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/abiword/abiword-gnome_2.4.1-1_i386.deb abiword-help_2.4.1-1_all.deb to pool/main/a/abiword/abiword-help_2.4.1-1_all.deb abiword-plugins-gnome_2.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/abiword/abiword-plugins-gnome_2.4.1-1_i386.deb abiword-plugins_2.4.1-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/abiword/abiword-plugins_2.4.1-1_i386.deb abiword_2.4.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/a/abiword/abiword_2.4.1-1.diff.gz abiword_2.4.1-1.dsc to pool/main/a/abiword/abiword_2.4.1-1.dsc abiword_2.4.1-1_i386.deb to
Bug#332800: marked as done (FTBFS/mipsel: kaffe no longer supports mipsel)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:38:51 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332800: FTBFS/mipsel: kaffe no longer supports mipsel has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 18:06:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 11:06:16 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.39.72] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOJ5M-0001U3-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:06:16 -0700 Received: from 22pc220.sshunet.nl ([145.97.220.22] helo=bla.wolffelaar.nl) by a-eskwadraat.nl with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EOJ5L-0008H6-Ic for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 20:06:15 +0200 Received: from jeroen by bla.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EOJ5L-0005He-EA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 20:06:15 +0200 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:06:15 +0200 From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FTBFS/mipsel: kaffe no longer supports mipsel Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: bigloo Severity: serious Because gcj nor jikes are able to compile java code on mipsel, kaffe unfortunately needed to be dropped for mipsel. Please stop building the java bindings for mipsel, and add a [!mipsel] qualification to your kaffe build-dependency. When you've made that upload, please reassign this bug to to ftp.debian.org so that the mipsel versions of bigloo-backend-jvm as they are in the archive now can be dropped. Please note that mips is in a similar situation, it's likely that kaffe will stop supporting mips too in the near future. So you could stop building java bindings for mips too, if you wish -- or alternatively wait and see, it's not sure yet. Thanks, --Jeroen -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl --- Received: (at 332800-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 18:36:23 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 11:36:23 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.29] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOJYV-00010K-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:36:23 -0700 Received: from nan92-1-81-57-214-146 (nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.214.146]) by smtp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA5328C5A; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:36:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwitch by nan92-1-81-57-214-146 with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EOJau-0008LB-8z; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 20:38:52 +0200 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:38:51 +0200 To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#332800: FTBFS/mipsel: kaffe no longer supports mipsel Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i From: Yann Dirson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 08:06:15PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: Because gcj nor jikes are able to compile java code on mipsel, kaffe unfortunately needed to be dropped for mipsel. Please stop building the java bindings for mipsel, and add a [!mipsel] qualification to your kaffe build-dependency. Already done, upload is on its way. When you've made that upload, please reassign this bug to to ftp.debian.org so that the mipsel versions of bigloo-backend-jvm as they are in the archive now can be dropped. The package was
Processed: Re: Let's remove one or two packages...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 328583 RM: xa+cv -- RoQA; rc-buggy, unused, very old Bug#328583: xa+cv -- RoQA; rc-buggy, unused, very old Changed Bug title. retitle 328592 RM: libsoap-perl -- RoQA; unused, upstream-dead, out of date Bug#328592: libsoap-perl -- RoQA; unused, upstream-dead, out of date Changed Bug title. retitle 328594 RM: gfont -- RoQA; unused, non-free Bug#328594: gfont -- RoQA; unused, non-free Changed Bug title. retitle 328600 RM: perl2html -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Bug#328600: perl2html -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Changed Bug title. retitle 328601 RM: tkirc -- RoQA; unused, out of date, alternatives available Bug#328601: tkirc -- RoQA; unused, out of date, alternatives available Changed Bug title. retitle 328662 RM: libdeconf-ruby -- RoQA; unused, out of date, useless Bug#328662: libdeconf-ruby -- RoQA; unused, out of date, useless Changed Bug title. retitle 328667 RM: rx320 -- RoQA; unused, out of date Bug#328667: rx320 -- RoQA; unused, out of date Changed Bug title. retitle 328669 RM: bnlib -- RoQA; unused, upstream dead, old Bug#328669: bnlib -- RoQA; unused, upstream dead, old Changed Bug title. retitle 328792 RM: lexmark7000linux -- RoQA; unused, useless, old Bug#328792: lexmark7000linux -- RoQA; unused, useless, old Changed Bug title. retitle 328796 RM: nonlock -- RoQA; unused, old, upstream dead, alternatives available Bug#328796: nonlock -- RoQA; unused, old, upstream dead, alternatives available Changed Bug title. retitle 328799 RM: xtet42 -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Bug#328799: xtet42 -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Changed Bug title. retitle 328800 RM: lxtools -- RoQA; unused, upstream dead, old Bug#328800: lxtools -- RoQA; unused, upstream dead, old Changed Bug title. retitle 328803 RM: scandetd -- RoQA; unused, rc-buggy, old, upstream dead Bug#328803: scandetd -- RoQA; unused, rc-buggy, old, upstream dead Changed Bug title. retitle 328804 RM: userlink -- RoQA; unused, deprecated Bug#328804: userlink -- RoQA; unused, deprecated Changed Bug title. retitle 328805 RM: ayuda -- RoQA; unused, buggy, old Bug#328805: ayuda -- RoQA; unused, buggy, old Changed Bug title. retitle 328807 RM: acidwarp -- RoQA; unused, buggy, old Bug#328807: acidwarp -- RoQA; unused, buggy, old Changed Bug title. retitle 328808 RM: zone-file-check -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Bug#328808: zone-file-check -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Changed Bug title. severity 328808 normal Bug#328808: RM: zone-file-check -- RoQA; unused, old, alternatives available Severity set to `normal'. retitle 328809 RM: escm -- RoQA; unused, buggy, old, upstream dead Bug#328809: escm -- RoQA; unused, buggy, old, upstream dead Changed Bug title. retitle 328810 RM: xodo -- RoQA; unused, old, upstream dead Bug#328810: xodo -- RoQA; unused, old, upstream dead Changed Bug title. retitle 328812 RM: doc-linux-ko -- RoQA; unused, old, deprecated Bug#328812: doc-linux-ko -- RoQA; unused, old, deprecated Changed Bug title. retitle 328815 RM: gmgaclock -- RoQA; unused, buggy, old Bug#328815: gmgaclock -- RoQA; unused, buggy, old Changed Bug title. retitle 328820 RM: tik -- RoQA; unused, buggy, old, alternatives available Bug#328820: tik -- RoQA; unused, buggy, old, alternatives available Changed Bug title. retitle 328821 RM: emwin -- RoQA; unused, old Bug#328821: emwin -- RoQA; unused, old Changed Bug title. retitle 328838 RM: camlp4-doc -- RoQA; unused, old Bug#328838: camlp4-doc -- RoQA; unused, old Changed Bug title. retitle 328853 RM: tag-types -- RoQA; unused, old, upstream dead Bug#328853: tag-types -- RoQA; unused, old, upstream dead Changed Bug title. retitle 328854 RM: nwutil -- RoQA; unused, old, buggy Bug#328854: nwutil -- RoQA; unused, old, buggy Changed Bug title. retitle 328856 RM: samba-doc-ja -- RoQA; unused, old, REALLY old Bug#328856: samba-doc-ja -- RoQA; unused, old, REALLY old Changed Bug title. retitle 328857 RM: libfloat -- RoQA; unused, old Bug#328857: libfloat -- RoQA; unused, old Changed Bug title. retitle 328866 RM: opennap -- RoM; unused, old Bug#328866: opennap -- RoM; unused, old Changed Bug title. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332290: horde3: Application is in a severely insecure state during configuration
Hello I now decided to disable horde3 entirelly by default. The admin need to remove two lines to enable it again. This solve most security issues. Regards, // Ola On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:17:37PM -0400, Mike O'Connor wrote: Package: horde3 Version: 3.0.5-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole As part of the installation procedure in README.Debian, you are told to configure horde3 via a web interface. This is done using an Administrator account which requires no password. In the time that the application is in this state, anyone who goes to the website is automatically logged in as Administrator with no password. The Administrative account is granted access to 3 tools that look extremely dangerous: cmdshell.php sqlshell.php and phpshell.php. I didn't determine what phpshell.php does. However when i used the cmdshell.php I was able to execute arbitrary commands as the www-user. For instance I was able to successfully execute cat /etc/passwd. This is horribly unacceptable. I would recommend that cmdshell.php and sqlshell.php be removed. They are a much bigger security hole than they are worth. I don't know what phpshell.php does, but I wouldn't be suprised if it were in this same category. I also would recommend that a password be required do use the Administration interface. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages horde3 depends on: ii apache [httpd] 1.3.33-7versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi-2 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli [phpapi-20020918] 4:4.3.10-15 command-line interpreter for the p ii php4-domxml 4:4.3.10-15 XMLv2 module for php4 ii php4-pear4:4.3.10-15 PEAR - PHP Extension and Applicati ii php4-pear-log1.6.0-1.1 Log module for PEAR Versions of packages horde3 recommends: ii logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility pn php-date none (no description available) pn php-file none (no description available) pn php-mail-mime none (no description available) pn php-services-weather none (no description available) pn php4-gd | php4-gd2none (no description available) pn php4-mcrypt none (no description available) pn php4-mysql | php4-pgsql | php none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- - Ola Lundqvist --- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#243004: vqadmin, vqregister - debian bugs #243004 and #243005
Hi Sam Aou are registered as maintainer of the package vqadmin and vqregister. Both are not buildable. Please fix them ASAP or I'll request them to be removed. Bastian -- Kirk to Enterprise -- beam down yeoman Rand and a six-pack. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332822: wajig search-apt writes to the current working directory instead of /etc/apt/
package: wajig replace: wajig version: 2.0.29 replace: 2.0.20 severity: critical I normally run wajig as an unprivialiged user from my home directory using sudo like I do for all other packages install related commands. Wajig assumes my location is /etc/apt/ when I am really in /home/$USER and this happens: console snip - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo wajig search-apt stable Using distribution stable. Retrieving the list of mirrors from www.debian.org... --12:15:12-- http://www.debian.org/mirror/mirrors_full = `mirrors_full' esolving www.debian.org... 192.25.206.10 Connecting to www.debian.org|192.25.206.10|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 163,789 (160K) [text/html] Then: The fastest non-US server seems to be: http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/non-US/ Writing sources.list. Done --- end snip Wajig has assumed all along without checking that I am issuing teh command from /etc/apt/ when I am really in /home/$USER/. I use sudo wajig update as I would use sudo apt-get update and expect that it updates the packages list as per usual . I hope I have three Debian installed Sarge machines, kernels, blackstar's kernel I compiled the others are standard Debian kernel images: Linux blackstar 2.6.11.7-Blackstar-1.1 #1 Mon May 2 03:00:18 PDT 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Linux fireroad 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Tue Aug 16 15:28:25 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Linux arbutus 2.6.12-3-multimedia-686 #1 Thu Jun 23 11:52:20 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux I've just re-checked these results by changing to root and working in root's home. wajig downloads a list of mirrors then procedes to find appropriate mirros and produded a sources.list in /root. Hope this helps, David -- David Fedoruk B.Mus. UBC,1986 Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003 Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough for music Sergei Rachmaninov
Bug#332283: ocamlnet_1.1-4 (unstable): fails to build
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:52:01PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: $ locate pa_o.cmo /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/camlp4/pa_o.cmo $ dpkg -S /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/camlp4/pa_o.cmo ocaml-nox: /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/camlp4/pa_o.cmo Is it the same on the s390 box who tried the build? $ dpkg -S pa_o.cmo ocaml-nox: /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/camlp4/pa_o.cmo Anyhow the bug seems to be on the ocaml-nox package and not in ocamlnet which indeed builds properly on a fresh sid (i386) pbuilder environment. s390 don't support native compiled code, maybe this is a problem. I did a strace and got the following: | execve(/usr/bin/camlp4, [camlp4, -nolib, -I, /home/waldi/debian/tmp/ocamlnet/ocamlnet-1.1/camlp4, pa_o.cmo, pa_op.cmo, pr_dump.cmo, cgi.ml], [/* 33 vars */]) = 0 | stat64(/home/waldi/debian/tmp/ocamlnet/ocamlnet-1.1/camlp4/pa_o.cmo, 0x7fb29570) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) | write(2, Error while loading \pa_o.cmo\: file not found in path.\n, 56) = 56 No trace of using the files in /usr/lib/ocaml/3.08.3/camlp4/. The build-environment is broken. Each second build it fails with | ocamlfind ocamlc -package unix pcre equeue -package camlp4 -syntax camlp4o -c nethttp.ml | File nethttp.ml, line 1, characters 0-1: | Could not find the .cmi file for interface nethttp.mli. | make[2]: *** [nethttp.cmo] Error 2 | rm nethtml_scanner.ml | make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/waldi/debian/tmp/ocamlnet/ocamlnet-1.1/src/netstring' Bastian -- Women are more easily and more deeply terrified ... generating more sheer horror than the male of the species. -- Spock, Wolf in the Fold, stardate 3615.4 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#332524: CVE name
== Candidate: CAN-2005-3178 URL: http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-3178 Reference: BUGTRAQ:20051005 xloadimage buffer overflow. Reference: URL:http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=bugtraqm=112862493918840w=2 Buffer overflow in xloadimage 4.1 and earlier might allow user-complicit attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long title name in a NIFF file, which triggers the overflow during (1) zoom, (2) reduce, or (3) rotate operations. -- The only stupid question is the unasked one. Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332545: Re: Bug#332545: X error prevents wine startup
lør, 08,.10.2005 kl. 15.38 +0200, skrev Marc Haber: On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:14:43PM -0400, Ove Kaaven wrote: Hmm, I've only upgraded my system partially since my last upload. Perhaps I need to do a full system upgrade and do a new build, then, can try that this weekend. But if someone could try to build the packages themselves and see if that works, though, that might be good. Building wine on a completely current sid (in a minimal chroot) does not solve the problem for me. Going back to 0.0.20050725-1 did. But it runs for me. Could you help debug it? Set the WINEDEBUG environment variable to +x11drv,+bitmap,+seh, for example, or perhaps all, and capture the output leading up to the error?
Processed: Fixed in upload of adduser 3.71 to experimental
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 176362 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#176362: adduser: addgroup and delgroup not symmetric Tags were: upstream Tags added: fixed-in-experimental tag 332815 + fixed-in-experimental Bug#332815: adduser: --disabled-passwd and --disabled-login non-functional There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed-in-experimental quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329197: marked as done (postgresql-7.4: fails with SIGBUS on some platforms)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:02:38 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#329197: fixed in postgresql-7.4 1:7.4.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Sep 2005 11:06:59 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 20 04:06:59 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from rimmer.farnz.org.uk [81.187.250.195]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EHfxj-0001MH-00; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 04:06:59 -0700
Received: by rimmer.farnz.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7DAFD59C014; Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:06:55 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Simon Farnsworth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: postgresql-7.4: Fails to start with a Bus Error
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:06:54 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: postgresql-7.4
Version: 1:7.4.8-17
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The init script cannot start postgresql-7.4 (/etc/init.d/postgresql-7.4 start).
If I attempt to start it by hand with:
sudo -u postgres /usr/lib/postgresql/7.4/bin/pg_ctl start -w -D
/var/lib/postgresql/7.4/main/ -l /var/log/postgresql/postgresql-7.4-main.log
I get:
waiting for postmaster to start/usr/lib/postgresql/7.4/bin/pg_ctl: line
417: 31939 Bus error $po_path ${1+$@}
${PGDATAOPTS+$PGDATAOPTS} /dev/null $logfile 21
.
This suggests that the postmaster process is getting a SIGBUS.
I was successfully running postgresql before the shift to the new layout,
so this is a recent regression on mips. If I have to upgrade postgresql
to recover, I'd like advice on how to get my data out of the database
and into the new version, although I can cope with having to restore
from backup and reenter anything that's been changed since.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: mips
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages postgresql-7.4 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libcomerr21.38-2 common error description library
ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-2 GCC support library
ii libkrb53 1.3.6-5MIT Kerberos runtime libraries
ii libpam0g 0.76-23Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libpq31:7.4.8-17 PostgreSQL C client library
ii libreadline5 5.0-10 GNU readline and history libraries
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii postgresql-client-7.4 1:7.4.8-17 front-end programs for PostgreSQL
ii postgresql-common 25 manager for PostgreSQL database cl
ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
postgresql-7.4 recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---
Received: (at 329197-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 20:08:18 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 13:08:18 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EOKty-0003FV-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:02:38 -0700
From: Martin Pitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#329197: fixed in postgresql-7.4 1:7.4.9-1
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:02:38 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: postgresql-7.4
Source-Version: 1:7.4.9-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
Bug#332289: marked as done (permissions on /etc/horde/horde3/* are too lax)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:02:29 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332289: fixed in horde3 3.0.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 17:16:56 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 10:16:56 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl254-118-016.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [216.254.118.16] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENCsy-0003oq-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:16:56 -0700 Received: from stew by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ENCsR-00023N-A7; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:16:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:16:23 -0400 From: Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: permissions on /etc/horde/horde3/* are too lax Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: horde3 Version: 3.0.5-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole In the README.Debian, in section 6. it is recommended that the end user executes: chown root.www config/* chmod 0440 config/* becuase the Some of Horde's configuration files contain passwords which local users could use to access your database. This is somehting that should be done by the maintainer scripts and not left up to the end user to do. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages horde3 depends on: ii apache [httpd] 1.3.33-7versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi-2 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli [phpapi-20020918] 4:4.3.10-15 command-line interpreter for the p ii php4-domxml 4:4.3.10-15 XMLv2 module for php4 ii php4-pear4:4.3.10-15 PEAR - PHP Extension and Applicati ii php4-pear-log1.6.0-1.1 Log module for PEAR Versions of packages horde3 recommends: ii logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility pn php-date none (no description available) pn php-file none (no description available) pn php-mail-mime none (no description available) pn php-services-weather none (no description available) pn php4-gd | php4-gd2none (no description available) pn php4-mcrypt none (no description available) pn php4-mysql | php4-pgsql | php none (no description available) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 332289-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 20:09:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 13:09:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOKtp-0003DG-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:02:29 -0700 From: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332289: fixed in horde3 3.0.5-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:02:29 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: horde3 Source-Version: 3.0.5-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of horde3, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: horde3_3.0.5-2.diff.gz to pool/main/h/horde3/horde3_3.0.5-2.diff.gz
Bug#332290: marked as done (horde3: Application is in a severely insecure state during configuration)
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:02:29 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332290: fixed in horde3 3.0.5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Oct 2005 17:18:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 05 10:18:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl254-118-016.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net (localhost.localdomain) [216.254.118.16] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ENCu7-00041c-00; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:18:07 -0700 Received: from stew by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ENCtd-00025Q-4d; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 13:17:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 13:17:37 -0400 From: Mike O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: horde3: Application is in a severely insecure state during configuration Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: horde3 Version: 3.0.5-1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole As part of the installation procedure in README.Debian, you are told to configure horde3 via a web interface. This is done using an Administrator account which requires no password. In the time that the application is in this state, anyone who goes to the website is automatically logged in as Administrator with no password. The Administrative account is granted access to 3 tools that look extremely dangerous: cmdshell.php sqlshell.php and phpshell.php. I didn't determine what phpshell.php does. However when i used the cmdshell.php I was able to execute arbitrary commands as the www-user. For instance I was able to successfully execute cat /etc/passwd. This is horribly unacceptable. I would recommend that cmdshell.php and sqlshell.php be removed. They are a much bigger security hole than they are worth. I don't know what phpshell.php does, but I wouldn't be suprised if it were in this same category. I also would recommend that a password be required do use the Administration interface. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages horde3 depends on: ii apache [httpd] 1.3.33-7versatile, high-performance HTTP s ii libapache-mod-php4 [phpapi-2 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti ii php4-cli [phpapi-20020918] 4:4.3.10-15 command-line interpreter for the p ii php4-domxml 4:4.3.10-15 XMLv2 module for php4 ii php4-pear4:4.3.10-15 PEAR - PHP Extension and Applicati ii php4-pear-log1.6.0-1.1 Log module for PEAR Versions of packages horde3 recommends: ii logrotate 3.7.1-2Log rotation utility pn php-date none (no description available) pn php-file none (no description available) pn php-mail-mime none (no description available) pn php-services-weather none (no description available) pn php4-gd | php4-gd2none (no description available) pn php4-mcrypt none (no description available) pn php4-mysql | php4-pgsql | php none (no description available) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 332290-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 20:08:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 13:08:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOKtp-0003DI-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:02:29 -0700 From: Ola Lundqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#332290: fixed in horde3 3.0.5-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL
Bug#332827: digikam: Missing Depends on libsqlite3-dev
Package: digikam Version: 0.8.0-0beta2-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, Your digikam.la file has a reference to libsqlite3.la, but you don't have a dependency to libsqlite3-dev. This causes digikamimageplugins to fail to build. Please add a Depends on libsqlite3-dev. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332828: libhal-storage-dev: Missing Depends on libhal-dev
Package: hal Version: 0.4.8-7 Severity: serious Hi, When building pmount (from experimental) I get the following error: Package hal was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `hal.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'hal', required by 'hal-storage', not found cc -c -g -Wall -O2 pmount-hal.c pmount-hal.c:20:28: error: libhal-storage.h: No such file or directory libhal-storage-dev should have a Depends on libhal-dev. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332829: gnustep-gui, pdfkit.framework: FTBFS on m68k
Package: pdfkit.framework, gnustep-gui Severity: serious Log for pdfkit.framework is at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=pdfkit.frameworkver=0.8-2.1arch=m68kstamp=1127774469file=logas=raw It's a fairly bizarre error: g++ XPDFBridge.cc -c \ -MMD -MP -DGNUSTEP -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_GUI_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_RUNTIME=1 -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DGSWARN -DGSDIAGNOSE -O2 -I.. -I../xpdf-3.00 -I../xpdf-3.00/xpdf -I../xpdf-3.00/splash -I../xpdf-3.00/goo -I../xpdf-3.00/fofi -g -I./../../derived_src -I. -I/home/buildd/GNUstep/Library/Headers -I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers -I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Network/Library/Headers -I/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Headers \ -o shared_obj/XPDFBridge.o cc1plus: error: /home/buildd/GNUstep/Library/Headers: Permission denied Log for gnustep-gui is at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=gnustep-guiver=0.9.5-2arch=m68kstamp=1126465410file=logas=raw Similar error: gcc Functions.m -c \ -MMD -MP -DGNUSTEP_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/lib/GNUstep/System -DGNUSTEP_TARGET_DIR=\.\ -DGNUSTEP_TARGET_CPU=\m68k\ -DGNUSTEP_TARGET_OS=\linux-gnu\ -DLIBRARY_COMBO=\gnu-gnu-gnu\ -DBACKEND_BUNDLE=1 -DGNUSTEP -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_GUI_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_RUNTIME=1 -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DGSWARN -DGSDIAGNOSE -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fgnu-runtime -Wall -fconstant-string-class=NSConstantString -I../Headers/Additions -I../Headers -I./. -I. -I/home/buildd/GNUstep/Library/Headers -I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers -I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Network/Library/Headers -I/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Headers \ -o shared_obj/Functions.o cc1obj: error: /home/buildd/GNUstep/Library/Headers: Permission denied It looks like a possible misconfiguration on the buildd. Or possibly just an extra-strict GCC refusing to run with a missing directory, while on other architectures it doesn't care. (This prevents gworkspace.app from undergoing the C++ transition.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of tapiir 0.7.1-7.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 297967 + fixed Bug#297967: tapiir: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid function declaration Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed tag 317226 + fixed Bug#317226: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required Tags were: pending patch sid Tags added: fixed tag 326096 + fixed Bug#326096: tapiir: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'libasound-dev' Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of rosegarden4 1.0-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 274494 + fixed Bug#274494: rosegarden4 0.9.9 patch for gcc 3.4 Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed tag 313926 + fixed Bug#313926: rosegarden4: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections Tags were: pending patch l10n Tags added: fixed tag 316593 + fixed Bug#316593: rosegarden4: rosegarden uninstallable Tags were: pending patch sid Bug#317217: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required Bug#328014: rosegarden4: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags added: fixed tag 317217 + fixed Bug#317217: libjack0.80.0-0 removed from unstable; rebuild required Tags were: fixed pending patch sid Bug#316593: rosegarden4: rosegarden uninstallable Bug#328014: rosegarden4: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Tags added: fixed tag 326669 + fixed Bug#326669: rosegarden4: FTBFS: explicit qualification in declaration of `Rosegarden::Colour Rosegarden::getCombinationColour(const Rosegarden::Colour, const Rosegarden::Colour)' Tags were: pending patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#331615: marked as done (galago-sharp: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch')
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:17:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#331615: fixed in galago-sharp 0.3.2-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2005 07:36:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 04 00:36:05 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from c129204.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.129.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EMhLI-0008V0-00; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:36:04 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.53) id 1EMhLH-0005At-8g; Tue, 04 Oct 2005 09:36:03 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: galago-sharp: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch' Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 09:36:03 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: galago-sharp Version: 0.3.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'galago-sharp' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: debian/rules clean debian/rules:14: /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make: No such file or directory make: *** No rule to make target `/usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make'. Stop. Please add the missing Build-Depends on 'dpatch' to debian/control. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/galago-sharp-0.3.2/debian/control ./debian/control --- ../tmp-orig/galago-sharp-0.3.2/debian/control 2005-10-04 07:15:27.0 + +++ ./debian/control2005-10-04 07:15:25.0 + @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Riccardo Setti [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libgalago-dev (= 0.3.2), devscripts, libmono-dev | c-sharp-compiler, mono-utils (= 0.96), pkg-config, mono-gac, autotools-dev, cli-common (= 0.2.0) +Build-Depends: debhelper, dpatch, libgalago-dev (= 0.3.2), devscripts, libmono-dev | c-sharp-compiler, mono-utils (= 0.96), pkg-config, mono-gac, autotools-dev, cli-common (= 0.2.0) Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: libgalago-cil --- Received: (at 331615-close) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 20:19:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 13:19:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOL7z-00053D-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:17:07 -0700 From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#331615: fixed in galago-sharp 0.3.2-2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:17:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: galago-sharp Source-Version: 0.3.2-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of galago-sharp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: galago-sharp_0.3.2-2.diff.gz to pool/main/g/galago-sharp/galago-sharp_0.3.2-2.diff.gz galago-sharp_0.3.2-2.dsc to pool/main/g/galago-sharp/galago-sharp_0.3.2-2.dsc libgalago-cil_0.3.2-2_i386.deb to pool/main/g/galago-sharp/libgalago-cil_0.3.2-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated galago-sharp package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 21:58:20 +0200 Source: galago-sharp Binary: libgalago-cil Architecture: source
Bug#332815: marked as done (adduser: --disabled-passwd and --disabled-login non-functional)
Your message dated Sat, 8 Oct 2005 22:15:56 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line [Adduser-devel] Fixed in upload of adduser 3.71 to experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 18:25:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 11:25:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 5301d.unt0.torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de (torres.zugschlus.de) [217.151.83.1] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOJOC-0007Ou-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 11:25:44 -0700 Received: from lefler.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de ([192.168.130.38]) by torres.zugschlus.de with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EOJO8-0006kQ-D5; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 20:25:42 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: adduser: --disabled-passwd and --disabled-login non-functional X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 20:25:39 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Score: (-) -5.9 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: adduser Version: 3.70 Severity: serious Justification: makes package unsuitable for release in maintainer's opinion In the experimental versions of adduser, the options --disabled-login and --disabled-passwd have been inadvertently renamed to --disabled_login and --disabled_password. This is a bug. They will be renamed back in 3.71. Greetings Marc -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-zgsrv Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages adduser depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii passwd1:4.0.12-6 change and administer password and ii perl-base 5.8.7-5The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis adduser recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded --- Received: (at 332815-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 20:15:58 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 13:15:58 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 5301d.unt0.torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de (torres.zugschlus.de) [217.151.83.1] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOL6r-0004tm-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:15:58 -0700 Received: from mh by torres.zugschlus.de with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EOL6q-00015p-6O; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 22:15:56 +0200 Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 22:15:56 +0200 From: Marc Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Adduser-devel] Fixed in upload of adduser 3.71 to experimental Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Version: 3.71 Tagging bugs as fixed via version tracking. Greetings Marc -- - Marc Haber | I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things.Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332822: wajig search-apt writes to the current working directory instead of /etc/apt/
Received Sun 09 Oct 2005 5:49am +1000 from David Fedoruk: package: wajig replace: wajig version: 2.0.29 replace: 2.0.20 severity: critical I normally run wajig as an unprivialiged user from my home directory using sudo like I do for all other packages install related commands. Wajig assumes my location is /etc/apt/ when I am really in /home/$USER and this happens: Hi David, Thanks for the bug report. I'm not sure why you think it might be a critical bug. It doesn't render the system unusable. In fact, if it did overwrite sources.list then I might even consider that a critical bug instead. The behaviour you report is how it is specifically implemented. I did not want to accidently overwrite /etc/apt/sources.list. The purpose of this command, as the description indicates, is to find local Debian archives SUITABLE FOR sources.list, rather than TO REPLACE CURRENT. Thus it creates a suggested sources.list file which it writes into wherever you run the command. In fact, this command does no more than to run the netselect-apt command. If the resulting sources.list looks okay to you then you can go ahead and cut and past the entry you want into the system version (perhaps using wajig editsources). I could add the extra functionality to automatically overwrite the system sources.list but that does seem a little dangerous to me, since many people fine tune their sources.list and overwritting it would be a surprise. I will close the bug with this email. Let me know if you don't agree with the rationale. Regards, Graham console snip - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo wajig search-apt stable Using distribution stable. Retrieving the list of mirrors from www.debian.org... --12:15:12-- http://www.debian.org/mirror/mirrors_full = `mirrors_full' esolving www.debian.org... 192.25.206.10 Connecting to www.debian.org|192.25.206.10|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 163,789 (160K) [text/html] Then: The fastest non-US server seems to be: http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/non-US/ Writing sources.list. Done --- end snip Wajig has assumed all along without checking that I am issuing teh command from /etc/apt/ when I am really in /home/$USER/. I use sudo wajig update as I would use sudo apt-get update and expect that it updates the packages list as per usual . I hope I have three Debian installed Sarge machines, kernels, blackstar's kernel I compiled the others are standard Debian kernel images: Linux blackstar 2.6.11.7-Blackstar-1.1 #1 Mon May 2 03:00:18 PDT 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Linux fireroad 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Tue Aug 16 15:28:25 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Linux arbutus 2.6.12-3-multimedia-686 #1 Thu Jun 23 11:52:20 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux I've just re-checked these results by changing to root and working in root's home. wajig downloads a list of mirrors then procedes to find appropriate mirros and produded a sources.list in /root. Hope this helps, David -- David Fedoruk B.Mus. UBC,1986 Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003 Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough for music Sergei Rachmaninov -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#332829: gnustep-gui, pdfkit.framework: FTBFS on m68k
Nathanael Nerode a écrit : Package: pdfkit.framework, gnustep-gui Severity: serious [...] Log for gnustep-gui is at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=gnustep-guiver=0.9.5-2arch=m68kstamp=1126465410file=logas=raw Similar error: gcc Functions.m -c \ -MMD -MP -DGNUSTEP_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/lib/GNUstep/System -DGNUSTEP_TARGET_DIR=\.\ -DGNUSTEP_TARGET_CPU=\m68k\ -DGNUSTEP_TARGET_OS=\linux-gnu\ -DLIBRARY_COMBO=\gnu-gnu-gnu\ -DBACKEND_BUNDLE=1 -DGNUSTEP -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_GUI_LIBRARY=1 -DGNU_RUNTIME=1 -DGNUSTEP_BASE_LIBRARY=1 -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DGSWARN -DGSDIAGNOSE -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fgnu-runtime -Wall -fconstant-string-class=NSConstantString -I../Headers/Additions -I../Headers -I./. -I. -I/home/buildd/GNUstep/Library/Headers -I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Local/Library/Headers -I/usr/local/lib/GNUstep/Network/Library/Headers -I/usr/lib/GNUstep/System/Library/Headers \ -o shared_obj/Functions.o cc1obj: error: /home/buildd/GNUstep/Library/Headers: Permission denied It looks like a possible misconfiguration on the buildd. Or possibly just an extra-strict GCC refusing to run with a missing directory, while on other architectures it doesn't care. (This prevents gworkspace.app from undergoing the C++ transition.) In the same gnustep-gui build log you can find too: dpkg-source: extracting gnustep-gui in gnustep-gui-0.9.5 dpkg-source: unpacking gnustep-gui_0.9.5.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: applying /home/buildd/build/gnustep-gui_0.9.5-2.diff.gz failed to open configuration file `/home/buildd/.dpkg.cfg' for reading: Permission denied dpkg-buildpackage: source package is gnustep-gui dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.9.5-2 failed to open configuration file `/home/buildd/.dpkg.cfg' for reading: Permission denied failed to open configuration file `/home/buildd/.dpkg.cfg' for reading: Permission denied dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture m68k failed to open configuration file `/home/buildd/.dpkg.cfg' for reading: Permission denied failed to open configuration file `/home/buildd/.dpkg.cfg' for reading: Permission denied failed to open configuration file `/home/buildd/.dpkg.cfg' for reading: Permission denied failed to open configuration file `/home/buildd/.dpkg.cfg' for reading: Permission denied failed to open configuration file `/home/buildd/.dpkg.cfg' for reading: Permission denied
Bug#332822: marked as done (wajig search-apt writes to the current working directory instead of /etc/apt/)
Your message dated Sun, 9 Oct 2005 06:40:19 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#332822: wajig search-apt writes to the current working directory instead of /etc/apt/ has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 19:38:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 12:38:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from qproxy.gmail.com [72.14.204.198] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOKWa-00084a-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 12:38:28 -0700 Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a10so173971qbd for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 12:37:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Rs5VPPcThsJ3u9jtv4Ot99a/M3tB8dk0UUJrJE12Czi1G6uTTr3FU87VReAfm1b7yONPV1ZRjulivJ9qXT7IyOIOJy2SBphxNz96koaw+tZpKJsEaQ39c0s/Y7K1gMAT5ZDd9xuEOlsL6vcxPfVdk/QXkHUe7s2qto12uTNinHo= Received: by 10.64.193.1 with SMTP id q1mr2175813qbf; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 12:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.43.20 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Oct 2005 12:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2005 12:37:54 -0700 From: David Fedoruk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: David Fedoruk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wajig search-apt writes to the current working directory instead of /etc/apt/ Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 package: wajig replace: wajig version: 2.0.29 replace: 2.0.20 severity: critical I normally run wajig as an unprivialiged user from my home directory using sudo like I do for all other packages install related commands. Wajig assumes my location is /etc/apt/ when I am really in /home/$USER and this happens: console snip - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo wajig search-apt stable Using distribution stable. Retrieving the list of mirrors from www.debian.org... --12:15:12-- http://www.debian.org/mirror/mirrors_full =3D `mirrors_full' esolving www.debian.org... 192.25.206.10 Connecting to www.debian.org|192.25.206.10|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 163,789 (160K) [text/html] Then: The fastest non-US server seems to be: http://debian.yorku.ca/debian/non-US/ Writing sources.list. Done --- end snip Wajig has assumed all along without checking that I am issuing teh command from /etc/apt/ when I am really in /home/$USER/. I use sudo wajig update as I would use sudo apt-get update and expect that it updates the packages list as per usual . I hope I have three Debian installed Sarge machines, kernels, blackstar's kernel I compiled the others are standard Debian kernel images: Linux blackstar 2.6.11.7-Blackstar-1.1 #1 Mon May 2 03:00:18 PDT 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Linux fireroad 2.4.27-2-386 #1 Tue Aug 16 15:28:25 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux Linux arbutus 2.6.12-3-multimedia-686 #1 Thu Jun 23 11:52:20 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux I've just re-checked these results by changing to root and working in root's home. wajig downloads a list of mirrors then procedes to find appropriate mirros and produded a sources.list in /root. Hope this helps, David -- David Fedoruk B.Mus. UBC,1986 Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003 Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough for music Sergei Rachmaninov --- Received: (at 332822-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Oct 2005 20:41:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 08 13:41:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony2.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.196] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EOLVC-0003YF-00; Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:41:06 -0700 Received: from 202-161-24-184.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO athene.togaware.com) ([202.161.24.184]) by ihug-mail.icp-qv1-irony2.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 09 Oct 2005 04:40:33
Bug#330602: irssi-text: also happens on unstable's latest irssi
Package: irssi-text Version: 0.8.9-3.1 Followup-For: Bug #330602 It also happens on unstable's latest irssi-text package and when loading ANY script - even an empty file or just typing /script exec 1. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages irssi-text depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib2.0-0 2.8.3-1The GLib library of C routines ii libncurses5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libperl5.85.8.7-5Shared Perl library ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7g-3 SSL shared libraries ii perl 5.8.7-5Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.7] 5.8.7-5The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis irssi-text recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329759: patch
tags 329759 patch
thanks
The attached patch fixes the problem. Please beware: this bug is a valid
NMU candidate, it blocks other packages.
Bastian
--
Many Myths are based on truth
-- Spock, The Way to Eden, stardate 5832.3
diff -u gst-plugins0.8-0.8.11/debian/control
gst-plugins0.8-0.8.11/debian/control
--- gst-plugins0.8-0.8.11/debian/control
+++ gst-plugins0.8-0.8.11/debian/control
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
Package: libgstreamer-plugins0.8-0
Architecture: any
Section: libs
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Description: Various GStreamer libraries and library plugins
This package contains various GStreamer libraries and library plugins which
include utilities for use by other GStreamer plugins and applications.
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
Package: libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0
Architecture: any
Section: libs
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
Suggests: gnome-media
Description: GConf support for GStreamer
This package contains support for GStreamer applications which use GConf to
diff -u gst-plugins0.8-0.8.11/debian/changelog
gst-plugins0.8-0.8.11/debian/changelog
--- gst-plugins0.8-0.8.11/debian/changelog
+++ gst-plugins0.8-0.8.11/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gst-plugins0.8 (0.8.11-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix dependencies of libgstreamer-gconf0.8-0. (closes: #329759)
+
+ -- Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 8 Oct 2005 20:50:48 +
+
gst-plugins0.8 (0.8.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Override gstreamer-dv section to extra because it depends on libavc1394-0
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#332822: acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#332822: wajig search-apt writes to the current working directory instead of /etc/apt/)
HI: I'm not sure why you think it might be a critical bug. It doesn't render the system unusable. In fact, if it did overwrite sources.list then I might even consider that a critical bug instead. I was thinking along the lines of missing critical security update becauase you thought you had upt to date sources when you didn't The behaviour you report is how it is specifically implemented. I did not want to accidently overwrite /etc/apt/sources.list. The purpose of this command, as the description indicates, is to find local Debian archives SUITABLE FOR sources.list, rather than TO REPLACE CURRENT. Thus it creates a suggested sources.list file which it writes into wherever you run the command. Then i miss interperted what was expected behaviour. I expect that my sources list would be edited (added to) not destroyed even old configuration files are valuable. In fact, this command does no more than to run the netselect-apt command. If the resulting sources.list looks okay to you then you can go ahead and cut and past the entry you want into the system version (perhaps using wajig editsources). The main reason I use Debian is its packaage management system which is light years ahead of anyoen elses, however even it is getting weighted down by the number of commands and layers so what I never got to with the older systems... list netselect and a few others, wajig instantly gave me access to in a way which I could remember. So in reading the documentation, much of it is new in that I didn't encounter it at all withouth wajig. That is the route of my missinterpertaion. I could add the extra functionality to automatically overwrite the system sources.list but that does seem a little dangerous to me, since many people fine tune their sources.list and overwritting it would be a surprise. Me as welll, I live in fear that an old configuration file will go into /dev/null when I had some valluable notes there! So I'm glad that this wasn'nt the case. Let me know if you don't agree with the rationale. No, I agree completely, but with my above explanations ... for some newer users things can be less than clear when you don't have years of experience piled on top. Wajig has been a godsend, It should have been done long ago. Even the best of systems get bogged down with addititons and improvements and sometimes somone needs to go through and merge it all together again. You've done that magnificently. But how about adding a few lines to the documentation in an upcoming version which makes this a bit clearer. It would help reduce the posibility of misinterpertation. Regards, David -- David Fedoruk B.Mus. UBC,1986 Certificate in Internet Systems Administration, UBC, 2003 Music is enough for one's life time, but one life time is not enough for music Sergei Rachmaninov
