Processed: penguin-command now uninstallable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 303705 grave Bug#303705: Incorrect libpng build-dependencies Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa
severity 335286 important merge 335286 323133 thanks On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:59:30PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: reassign 335286 lilypond thanks On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:49:17PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Compiling lilypond 2.6.3-7 on hppa, gcc reports an internal error. See: http:://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=lilypondver=2.6.3-7arch=hppastamp=1130038470file=logas=raw Severity serious because this creates an FTBFS situation for lilypond. Sorry, this is a known bug in gcc that isn't going to be fixed upstream until 4.1, and that's still a ways out. As a workaround, please update lilypond to use g++-3.4 when building on arm, hppa, and m68k, as g++-3.4 doesn't suffer from this particular bug. How do you know that this is a known bug without knowing what the bug is? It does not match the other hppa compilation bug reported, which manifests itself in incorrect code instead of compilation errors, and which is hppa-specific, while this one appears on arm too. Can you give me a pointer to your reasons for leaping to the conclusion that a bug you haven't examined must be a known bug? Can you give me a pointer to your reasons for leaping to the conclusion that I haven't examined the bug? global-context.cc: In member function 'Moment Global_context::_ZTv0_n24_NK14Global_context7now_momEv() const': global-context.cc:209: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs. This is the single most common build failure on arm, hppa, and m68k right now, and has affected literally dozens or hundreds of other packages. I do kinda know it on sight by this point. Moreover, this bug should remain filed against gcc-4.0, because it is, in fact, a bug in gcc 4.0. There is a *separate* bug filed against lilypond referring to this one. This bug should remain open and filed against gcc-4.0 until a fix is uploaded for Debian. That's fine; I had reassigned it to lilypond before I received the mail that you had filed a separate bug there. But this is a duplicate of 323133, so merging. It also is not a release-critical bug because there is a valid workaround for all affected packages, and in spite of the sizeable impact it's non-trivial to fix and has been triaged out of necessity. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#303705: penguin-command now uninstallable on non-i386
penguin-command is now uninstallable except on i386. Accordingly the severity of this bug has been raised to 'grave'. The package will be removed from 'testing' if necessary to get the newest libpng into etch. On 8 Apr 2005, Karl Bartel wrote: Thanks! I'll fix this in the next upload. I guess it is about time for that next upload. Hope you're OK, Karl. -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Insert famous quote here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 335286 important Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm Severity set to `important'. merge 335286 323133 Bug#323133: [PR 21123, 4.0 regression, fixed in 4.1] ICE on arm m68k when compiling arts (in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101) Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #323133 has `g++-4.0'; #335286 has `gcc-4.0' Values for `forwarded addr' don't match: #323133 has `http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123'; #335286 has `' Values for `blocks' don't match: #323133 has `326224'; #335286 has `335287' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335293: bandersnatch: Totally wrong copyright file
Package: bandersnatch Severity: serious This contains the same sort of broken copyright file as shc and matanza. It claims the package is copyright Craig Small; it's not, it's copyright David Young (and possibly others; I don't know since I didn't look at all the code). It says This package has many utilities that are GPL or close to GPL code. Close to GPL code doesn't mean anything, and it's not an acceptable license. I wasn't able to get a clean download, so I can't tell you what the actual license terms are. Please improve your skills for proper 'copyright' file handling before uploading any more packages. debian-legal@lists.debian.org should answer any questions you have. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335199: cupsys: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.
Hi, At Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:42:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: cupsys Version: 1.1.99.b1.r4748-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error: Linking libcups.so.2... /usr/bin/ld: array.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `cupsArrayCurrent' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value The build log does not show the actual commands used to compile, but it probably didn't use -fPIC to make array.o and the other .o files. To make a shared library you need to be using -fPIC. For a static library you shouldn't be using it. I confirmed on my AMD64 but the problem isn't of -fPIC. Here is make -n result. echo Compiling array.c... cc -Wshadow -Wunused -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -O2 -fpie -I..-g -Wall -O2 -fpie -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -c array.c echo Linking libcups.so.2... cc -Wl,-soname,libcups.so.2 -shared -Wshadow -Wunused -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPI C -O2 -fpie -o libcups.so.2 array.o attr.o auth.o backchannel.o dest.o dir.o emi t.o encode.o file.o getputfile.o globals.o http.o http-addr.o http-support.o ipp .o ipp-support.o langprintf.o language.o mark.o md5.o md5passwd.o normalize.o op tions.o page.o ppd.o snprintf.o string.o tempfile.o transcode.o usersys.o util.o -L/usr/lib -lgnutls -lpthread -lz I searched a similar problem, but all of I can find is only old resolved binutils + pragma issue. Dear gcc team, could you help me? Thanks, -- Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: pgplot5 uninstallable in unstable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 328345 grave Bug#328345: pgplot5: please rebuild against latest libpng Severity set to `grave'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335291: mapserver: FTBFS on hppa
clone 335291 -1 reassign -1 libcurl3-openssl-dev 7.15.0-3 retitle -1 curl-config --vernum is empty thanks On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:44:13AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Package: mapserver Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source Log at http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=mapserverver=4.6.1-3arch=hppastamp=1129937926file=logas=raw This is a very dumb error: configure: checking for curl-config... checking for curl-config... /usr/bin/curl-config found libcurl version 7.15.0 configure: error: libcurl version 7.10.1 or more recent is required. make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1 Your configure script is being very stupid, since it thinks that 7.15.0 is older than 7.10.1. It's a dumb error message, but the real problem is that it's checking the output of curl-config --vernum, which is empty in libcurl3-openssl-dev 7.15.0-3. (The generated error message uses the value of curl-config --version instead.) I assume that since the commandline option still exists, that it's meant to still be available for use. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#335291: mapserver: FTBFS on hppa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 335291 -1 Bug#335291: mapserver: FTBFS on hppa Bug 335291 cloned as bug 335296. reassign -1 libcurl3-openssl-dev 7.15.0-3 Bug#335296: mapserver: FTBFS on hppa Bug reassigned from package `mapserver' to `libcurl3-openssl-dev'. retitle -1 curl-config --vernum is empty Bug#335296: mapserver: FTBFS on hppa Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334938: nmu patch
Hi,
I've NMU'd this as having Crypt::SSLeay broken makes me extremely
unproductive. The NMU diff is attached.
--
Joshua Kwan
diff -urN crypt-ssleay-0.51/debian/changelog
x/crypt-ssleay-0.51/debian/changelog
--- crypt-ssleay-0.51/debian/changelog 2005-10-22 23:58:03.0 -0700
+++ x/crypt-ssleay-0.51/debian/changelog2005-10-22 23:57:45.0
-0700
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+crypt-ssleay (0.51-4.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Use SSL_library_init() before doing anything. closes: #334938, #334935
+
+ -- Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:53:44 -0700
+
crypt-ssleay (0.51-4) unstable; urgency=low
* added missing ${shlibs:Depends}; Thanks Matej
diff -urN crypt-ssleay-0.51/SSLeay.xs x/crypt-ssleay-0.51/SSLeay.xs
--- crypt-ssleay-0.51/SSLeay.xs 2003-05-27 23:55:02.0 -0700
+++ x/crypt-ssleay-0.51/SSLeay.xs 2005-10-22 23:57:45.0 -0700
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@
static int bNotFirstTime;
char buf[1024];
int rand_bytes_read;
+
+ SSL_library_init();
if(!bNotFirstTime) {
SSLeay_add_all_algorithms();
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processed: reassign 334938 to libcrypt-ssleay-perl, severity of 334935 is grave, merging 334938 334935
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 reassign 334938 libcrypt-ssleay-perl Bug#334938: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses Bug reassigned from package `libssl0.9.8' to `libcrypt-ssleay-perl'. severity 334935 grave Bug#334935: using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl Severity set to `grave'. merge 334938 334935 Bug#334935: using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl Bug#334938: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses Merged 334935 334938. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298709: chrony: just segfaults on amd64
Package: chrony Version: 1.20-8 Followup-For: Bug #298709 Chrony just segfaults on amd64 with that patch. Compiled with gcc 4.0.2 on testing. gdb doestn't provide anything useful if I start it with the -d option I tested it even with standard debian 2.6.8 kernel and gcc 3.4.5 (gdb) r -d Starting program: /usr/sbin/chronyd -d (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) sys_linux.c:649:(get_version_specific_details)[23-07:07:48] Initial txc.tick=1 txc.freq=0 (0.) txc.offset=0 = hz=100 shift_hz=7 sys_linux.c:665:(get_version_specific_details)[23-07:07:48] set_config_hz=0 hz=100 shift_hz=7 basic_freq_scale=1.2800 nominal_tick=1 slew_delta_tick=833 max_tick_bias=1000 sys_linux.c:703:(get_version_specific_details)[23-07:07:48] Linux kernel major=2 minor=6 patch=13 sys_linux.c:787:(get_version_specific_details)[23-07:07:48] calculated_freq_scale=0.99902439 freq_scale=0.99902439 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x004111e5 in ?? () (gdb) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.13 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages chrony depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libncurses5 5.4-9 Shared libraries for terminal hand ii libreadline4 4.3-17 GNU readline and history libraries chrony recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of crypt-ssleay 0.51-4.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 334935 + fixed Bug#334935: using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl There were no tags set. Bug#334938: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses Tags added: fixed tag 334938 + fixed Bug#334938: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses Tags were: fixed Bug#334935: using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#304300: marked as done (samba: Security update breaks systems)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:11:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#304300: Should this bug be kept opened? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2005 08:52:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 12 01:52:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cimice0.lam.cz (cimice.yo.cz) [212.71.168.90] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DLH8U-0004O8-00; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 01:52:42 -0700 Received: from bulb by cimice.yo.cz with local (Exim 4.34) id 1DLH7y-0008SU-LE; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:52:10 +0200 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:52:10 +0200 From: Jan Hudec [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: samba: Security update breaks systems Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: samba Version: 2.2.3a-14.2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Tags: woody patch The postinst script for samba contains this errorneous code: if [ -d /var/samba/ ]; then mv /var/samba/* /var/lib/samba/ 2/dev/null || true rmdir /var/samba/ fi Without actually checking that the directory contains the stuff that should be moved to /var/lib/samba. That directory is commonly used for the shared data (akin to /var/www). This code breaks such system. The code should really do: mkdir -p /var/lib/samba for F in ntdrivers.tdb ntforms.tdb ntprinters.tdb secrets.tdb share_info.tdb wins.dat; do if [ -f /var/samba/$F ]; then mv /var/samba/$F /var/lib/samba fi fi grep /var/samba /etc/samba/smb.conf || rmdir /var/samba || true The problem was already there in the previous update and was not fixed. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux shpek 2.4.26 #2 Thu Apr 29 15:18:53 CEST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages samba depends on: ii debconf 1.0.32 Debian configuration management sy ii libc62.2.5-11.8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libcupsys2 1.1.14-5woody12 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libpam0g 0.72-35 Pluggable Authentication Modules l ii logrotate3.5.9-8 Log rotation utility ii netbase 4.07Basic TCP/IP networking system ii samba-common 2.2.3a-14.2 Samba common files used by both th --- Received: (at 304300-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 07:11:13 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 00:11:13 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-086.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (tennyson.dodds.net) [66.93.39.86] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETa0e-00057Z-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:11:13 -0700 Received: by tennyson.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A0FDF7002; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:11:07 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#304300: Should this bug be kept opened? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --n+lFg1Zro7sl44OB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Version: 3.0.14a-3 On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 06:36:02PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: The postinst script for samba contains this errorneous code: if
Bug#76918: M0ve With This Company, The Upcoming Week!hemmable
editting Hot Fortune 1000 Company On The Move, Watch It! C0mpany: ESPRE Solutions, Inc. Symb0L: EPRT . Pk Current_Price: 1.O7 * Note: Massive Marketing Campaign Alert Starting Tuesday At The Close Of The Market, Get In Early! ESPRE Solutions, Inc. Receives TMC Labs 2005 Innovation Award from Customer Interaction Solutions(R) Magazine ESPRE Solutions, Inc., a Dallas-based media solutions and technology company with a revolutionary and patented video compression technology, today announced that Technology Marketing Corporation's TMC Labs division named ESPRE's eViewLink wireless video collaboration solution as a 2005 Innovation Award winner from Customer Interaction Solutions magazine. The award was given to ESPRE's revolutionary eViewLink technology. eViewLink was designed to enable real-time wireless video collaboration between an expert in the office and personnel in the field. The eViewLink system includes a wearable, wireless eViewLink portable unit, the eViewLink console for use on a stationary computer, and the eViewLink server for bridging connections between portable units and stationary consoles. The TMC Labs 2005 Innovation Award highlights will be published in the October and November 2005 issues of Customer Interaction Solutions magazine. About ESPRE Solutions, Inc.: Texas-based ESPRE Solutions is a public company and groundbreaking media collaboration solutions provider that fulfills the promise of TV-quality streaming video over the Internet--even at dial-up speeds as low as 28Kbps. ESPRE Solutions intends to be the video applications provider of choice for Internet Service Providers, Fortune 1000 corporations, and institutions worldwide, adding both narrowband and broadband video to traditional voice and data applications. ESPRE Solutions' eView product suite provides an integrated solution for business and personal communications. Be Sure To Get In On EPRT immediately On Monday For Great Gains! flittest precept joint brazier gametic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 335286 to g++-4.0, bug 335287 is forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123 ... ... ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 reassign 335286 g++-4.0 Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `g++-4.0'. forwarded 335287 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123 Bug#335287: lilypond: FTBFS internal error compiling on hppa,arm Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123. block 326224 with 355286 Bug number 355286 not found. Unknown blocking bug/s: 355286. Bug#326224: kmldonkey_0.10-2(m68k/unstable/poseidon): fails to build from source Was blocked by: 323133 323686 Blocking bugs added: block 335287 with 323133 Bug#335287: lilypond: FTBFS internal error compiling on hppa,arm Was blocked by: 335286 Blocking bugs added: 323133, 323686 merge 323133 355286 Bug#323133: [PR 21123, 4.0 regression, fixed in 4.1] ICE on arm m68k when compiling arts (in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101) Bug number 355286 not found. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: block 326224 with 335286, merging 323133 335286
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 block 326224 with 335286 Bug#326224: kmldonkey_0.10-2(m68k/unstable/poseidon): fails to build from source Was blocked by: 323133 323686 Blocking bugs added: 335286 merge 323133 335286 Bug#323133: [PR 21123, 4.0 regression, fixed in 4.1] ICE on arm m68k when compiling arts (in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101) Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `forwarded addr' don't match: #323133 has `http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123'; #335286 has `' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: bug 335286 is forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123, bug 335287 is not forwarded ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 forwarded 335286 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123 Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123. notforwarded 335287 Bug#335287: lilypond: FTBFS internal error compiling on hppa,arm Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR21123. merge 323133 335286 Bug#323133: [PR 21123, 4.0 regression, fixed in 4.1] ICE on arm m68k when compiling arts (in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101) Bug#335286: gcc: Internal error compiling lilypond on hppa,arm Bug#323686: [PR 21123] ICE in cp_expr_size, compiling orbit2cpp in unstable Merged 323133 323686 335286. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?
posted mailed Tommi Vainikainen wrote: Hello members of debian-legal, It isn't currently well known that Debian website's license is Open Publication License, which has been judged to be non-free, and therefore needs to be changed. We know. ;-) Currently web pages are Copyright © 1997-2005 SPI and license terms linking to Open Publication license are available at URL: http://www.de.debian.org/license . However SPI has not been collecting any paper work to transfer copyrights like FSF does, and probably many contributors do not even know about that their work is automatically copyrighted by SPI. Well, actually, it isn't see below. So basically there is two questions: Does missing paperwork create a problem? Yes. In the US, without a paper transfer, copyright is retained by the author (except in work-for-hire cases, which actually might be relevant, but I doubt it). That means that the copyright statements on the web pages are wrong. And what would be good license for Debians web pages? (This is about content, the scripts used in generation are GNU GPL or otherwise freely licensed.) Either GNU GPL v. 2 or 2-clause BSD or MIT/Expat. Author's choice, I think. There is little harm in having different licenses for different web pages. Each time a (manually generated) web page is changed significantly, the copyright statement should be updated and the license agreed to by the new author. Because copyright is currently claimed by SPI Inc, and SPI's board meeting is coming rather soon, I brought this issue to SPI's secretarys attention, but SPI board would appreciate some suggestion what they should decide about license change. -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in the interest of efficiency.) --Steve Lanagasek, http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html
Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?
posted mailed Bas Zoetekouw wrote: Hi Francesco! You wrote: A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and simply asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be tracked, contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing. I'm afraid that this will turn out to be infeasable. Lots and lots of people have contributed to the webpages. To make it even worse, a lots of translators used to work though general cvs accounts (like dutch or french), making it even harder to find out who did what. In that case... If you can get a legal opinion that the pages were created as works-for-hire, then SPI actually does hold the copyrights. Otherwise, you're stuck rewriting the webpages, if you want to be legal. -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in the interest of efficiency.) --Steve Lanagasek, http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335298: zvbi: strict arch:any-arch:all dependencies break binNMUs (uninstallable on sparc)
Package: zvbi
Version: 0.2.17-3
Severity: grave
libzvbi0 declares a strict dependency on libzvbi-common (= ${Source-Version}).
This unfortunately breaks binNMUs; and as it happens, a binNMU was just done
of zvbi on sparc to correct for a wrong dependency picked up on a buildd.
Since dpkg-dev *should* be taught to treat Source-Version correctly for
binNMUs, the fact that the package can't be binNMUed is not itself a
release-critical bug at this time; but please do a sourceful upload of zvbi
so that the binaries on sparc can be fixed.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#335287: marked as done (lilypond: FTBFS internal error compiling on hppa,arm)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:02:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335287: fixed in lilypond 2.6.3-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 03:50:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 22 20:50:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETWsG-0004ln-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:50:20 -0700 Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ETWsG-0006vh-Ah for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:50:20 -0700 From: Thomas Bushnell BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lilypond: FTBFS internal error compiling on hppa X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Windows: Warn your friends about it. Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:50:20 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Version: 2.6.3-7 Package: lilypond Severity: serious Lilypond fails to build on hppa due to a gcc bug. Reported to the gcc-4.0 package. --- Received: (at 335287-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 09:08:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 02:08:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETbk2-nh-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:02:10 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#335287: fixed in lilypond 2.6.3-8 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:02:10 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: lilypond Source-Version: 2.6.3-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of lilypond, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: lilypond-data_2.6.3-8_all.deb to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond-data_2.6.3-8_all.deb lilypond-doc_2.6.3-8_all.deb to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond-doc_2.6.3-8_all.deb lilypond_2.6.3-8.diff.gz to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.3-8.diff.gz lilypond_2.6.3-8.dsc to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.3-8.dsc lilypond_2.6.3-8_powerpc.deb to pool/main/l/lilypond/lilypond_2.6.3-8_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated lilypond package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:18:36 -0700 Source: lilypond Binary: lilypond-data lilypond-doc lilypond Architecture: source all powerpc Version: 2.6.3-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: lilypond - A program for typesetting sheet music lilypond-data - LilyPond music typesetter (data files) lilypond-doc - LilyPond Documentation in HTML, PS and DVI formats Closes: 335287 Changes: lilypond (2.6.3-8) unstable; urgency=low . * Avoid GCC 4.0 bug on arm, hppa, and m68k. * debian/control (Build-Depends): Add g++-3.4 on arm, hppa, and m68k. * debian/rules: On arm,
Bug#335303: tetex-bin: failed to install: updmap error
Package: tetex-bin Version: 3.0-10.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Output of apt: Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10.1) ... Running fmtutil-sys. This may take some time. ... Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ... updmap failed. Output has been stored in /tmp/tetex.updmap.XXsPQmRp Please include this file if you report a bug. dpkg: error processing tetex-bin (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of tetex-extra: tetex-extra depends on tetex-bin (= 2.99); however: Package tetex-bin is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing tetex-extra (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: tetex-bin tetex-extra E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Content of /tmp/tetex.updmap.XXsPQmRp: updmap-sys: This is updmap-sys, version 1107552857-debian updmap-sys: using transcript file `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap-sys.log' updmap is creating new map files using the following configuration: config file: `/var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg' dvips output directory: `/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/updmap' pdftex output directory: `/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap' dvipdfm output directory: `/var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvipdfm/updmap' prefer outlines: `true' texhash enabled: `true' download standard fonts (dvips): `false' download standard fonts (pdftex): `false' download standard fonts (dvipdfm): `false' updmap-sys: Scanning for LW35 support files !!! ERROR: The right location for map files has been changed for this release and the map file `dvips35.map' has not been found in the right location, but in the obsolete location /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/dvips35.map instead. To fix this, please move this file into an appropriate subdirectory of fonts/map in one of your texmf trees. If the file has been installed by a Debian package, please do not move it. Instead, please report a bug against that package, and send a copy of that bug to debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org For more information about the changed search paths, see the release notes section in the teTeX manual. You probably can read this document by executing the command texdoc TETEXDOC else visit the web page http://tug.org/texlive/mapenc.html !!! ERROR: The right location for map files has been changed for this release and the map file `pdftex35.map' has not been found in the right location, but in the obsolete location /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/pdftex35.map instead. To fix this, please move this file into an appropriate subdirectory of fonts/map in one of your texmf trees. If the file has been installed by a Debian package, please do not move it. Instead, please report a bug against that package, and send a copy of that bug to debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org For more information about the changed search paths, see the release notes section in the teTeX manual. You probably can read this document by executing the command texdoc TETEXDOC else visit the web page http://tug.org/texlive/mapenc.html !!! ERROR! The map file `dvipdfm35.map' has not been found at all. Either put this file into the right place or remove the reference from the configuration file. An automatic way to disable unavailable map files is to call updmap-sys --syncwithtrees For manual editing, call updmap-sys --edit -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.10 Locale: LANG=fr_FR, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 2.15 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1package maintenance system for Deb ii ed0.2-20 The classic unix line editor ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libkpathsea4 3.0-10.1 path search library for teTeX (run ii libpaper1 1.1.14-3 Library for handling paper charact ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++64.0.2-2The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libt1-5 5.1.0-2Type 1 font rasterizer library - r ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li ii libxaw8
Bug#335306: Yet another local file inclusion vulnerability
Package: phpmyadmin Tags: security Severity: grave This one seems to be different from the vulnerability mentioned in Debian bug #333433. From: Stefan Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-disclosure] Advisory 16/2005: phpMyAdmin Local File Inclusion Vulnerability To: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@securityfocus.com Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 15:33:46 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hardened-PHP Project www.hardened-php.net -= Security Advisory =- Advisory: phpMyAdmin Local File Inclusion Vulnerability Release Date: 2005/10/22 Last Modified: 2005/10/22 Author: Stefan Esser [EMAIL PROTECTED] Application: phpMyAdmin = 2.6.4-pl2 Severity: A design flaw within phpMyAdmin allows inclusion of arbitrary files, which usually leads to remote code execution Risk: Critical Vendor Status: Vendor has released an updated version References: http://www.hardened-php.net/advisory_162005.73.html [...] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335103: marked as done (apt-cache search segfault on alpha)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:17:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335103: fixed in apt 0.6.42.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 22:37:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 21 15:37:20 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ET5Vo-0007G3-00; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:37:20 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (97-148-dial.xtn.net [66.118.97.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F4D1816B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:37:17 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 972C4BF0AA; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:37:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:37:34 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apt-cache search segfault on alpha Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: apt Version: 0.6.42 Severity: important Tags: d-i apt-cache search anything seems to segfault on alpha (i386 and sparc are ok). 0.6.41 was ok. Unfortunatly this prevents d-i from working since it uses apt-cache search to work out what kernel packages are available for install. I built apt and got a backtrace, here's the result. (gdb) r search apt Starting program: /root/tmp/apt-0.6.42/build/bin/apt-cache search apt Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. LocalityCompare (a=3DVariable a is not available. ) at apt-cache.cc:64 64 if (A-File =3D=3D B-File) (gdb) bt #0 LocalityCompare (a=3DVariable a is not available. ) at apt-cache.cc:64 #1 0x0233bc58 in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #2 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #3 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #4 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #5 0x0233bc24 in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #6 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #7 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #8 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #9 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #10 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #11 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #12 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #13 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #14 0x0233bc0c in bsearch () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #15 0x0233bea4 in qsort () from /lib/libc.so.6.1 #16 0x0001200038c0 in LocalitySort (begin=3DVariable begin is not ava= ilable. ) at apt-cache.cc:72 #17 0x00012000ae84 in Search ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at apt-cache.cc:1298 #18 0x0205e164 in CommandLine::DispatchArg () from /usr/lib/libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.3.10 #19 0x00012000f288 in main (argc=3DVariable argc is not available. ) at apt-cache.cc:1798 (gdb)=20 --=20 see shy jo --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDWW0Xd8HHehbQuO8RAqYJAJ9fr8C3VawXS/F1QnXOyATvVa3VTgCfUMpz BD6EWOgzX2Q3m7uqUQiQutQ= =KAoI -END PGP SIGNATURE- --huq684BweRXVnRxX-- --- Received: (at 335103-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 10:18:01 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 03:17:54 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETcuZ-0008W8-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:17:07 -0700 From: Michael Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
Bug#335317: k3b is missing, but k3b-i18n is already there
Subject: k3b-i18n: k3b fails Package: k3b-i18n Version: 0.12.4a-2 Severity: serious Justification: must *** Please type your report below this line *** The Package k3b is missed, but k3b-i18n is on the servers yet. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335279: spamassassin: also seeing the same problem
Package: spamassassin Version: 3.1.0a-1 Followup-For: Bug #335279 Hi, Duncan. I'm also seeing the same problem reported by the original poster, but, in my case, I had to install more packages to make the daemon start. If I remember correctly, I had to install: libnet-dns-perl libmail-spf-query-perl libsys-hostname-long-perl libsocket6-perl and their dependencies. I guess that they should indeed be added to the depends field instead of just being recommended? Please let me know if you need more information. Thanks, Rogério Brito. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14-rc4-2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages spamassassin depends on: ii libdigest-sha1-perl 2.10-1 NIST SHA-1 message digest algorith ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.45-3 A collection of modules that parse ii perl 5.8.7-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction Versions of packages spamassassin recommends: ii libnet-dns-perl 0.53-2 Perform DNS queries from a Perl sc ii perl [libmime-base64-perl]5.8.7-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii spamc 3.1.0a-1 Client for SpamAssassin spam filte -- debconf information: spamassassin/upgrade/2.40: spamassassin/upgrade/2.40w: spamassassin/upgrade/cancel: Continue spamassassin/upgrade/2.42m: No spamassassin/upgrade/2.42u: No -- Rogério Brito : [EMAIL PROTECTED] : http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito Homepage of the algorithms package : http://algorithms.berlios.de Homepage on freshmeat: http://freshmeat.net/projects/algorithms/
Bug#335303: tetex-bin: failed to install: updmap error
Hi, Sebastien Helleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Output of apt: Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-10.1) ... What does 'dpkg -l tetex-base' say? Running updmap-sys. This may take some time. ... [...] !!! ERROR: The right location for map files has been changed for this release and the map file `dvips35.map' has not been found in the right location, but in the obsolete location /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/dvips35.map instead. What does 'ls -l /usr/share/texmf/dvips/' give you? And 'dpkg -S dvips35.map'? !!! ERROR: The right location for map files has been changed for this release and the map file `pdftex35.map' has not been found in the right location, but in the obsolete location /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/pdftex35.map instead. Please tell us the output of 'dpkg -S pdftex35.map'. !!! ERROR! The map file `dvipdfm35.map' has not been found at all. Hah. What do you get from 'ls -l /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map'? Thanks. -- Florent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335344: /usr/bin/apt-get: Unable to install libgtk2.0-dev, dependencies issue
Package: apt Version: 0.5.28.6 Severity: grave File: /usr/bin/apt-get Justification: renders package unusable When trying to install the package libgtk2.0-dev, apt stops at this errormessage: # apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgtk2.0-dev: Depends: libpango1.0-dev (= 1.4.0-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libx11-dev but it is not going to be installed or xlibs-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages How to solve this problem? -- Package-specific info: -- apt-config dump -- APT ; APT::Architecture i386; APT::Build-Essential ; APT::Build-Essential:: build-essential; Dir /; Dir::State var/lib/apt/; Dir::State::lists lists/; Dir::State::cdroms cdroms.list; Dir::State::userstatus status.user; Dir::State::status /var/lib/dpkg/status; Dir::Cache var/cache/apt/; Dir::Cache::archives archives/; Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache srcpkgcache.bin; Dir::Cache::pkgcache pkgcache.bin; Dir::Etc etc/apt/; Dir::Etc::sourcelist sources.list; Dir::Etc::vendorlist vendors.list; Dir::Etc::vendorparts vendors.list.d; Dir::Etc::main apt.conf; Dir::Etc::parts apt.conf.d; Dir::Etc::preferences preferences; Dir::Bin ; Dir::Bin::methods /usr/lib/apt/methods; Dir::Bin::dpkg /usr/bin/dpkg; DPkg ; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs ; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 ; read a /dev/tty ); fi; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true; -- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) -- -- /etc/apt/sources.list -- #deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main deb http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian/ sarge main deb-src http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian/ sarge main # Sikkerhetsoppdateringer deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main # Mplayer - maa hete testing/stable ikke sarge deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ stable main # Mplayer plugin mozilla # deb http://marillat.free.fr/ sarge main -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=no_NO, LC_CTYPE=no_NO (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages apt depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0-0pre6ubuntu7 GCC support library ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335303: tetex-bin: failed to install: updmap error
Sebastien Helleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade? I think from 3.0-10. You can confirm by looking at /var/log/dpkg.log. Interesting, current tetex has 'true' for the last two options. What is the output of 'ls /etc/texmf/updmap.d/'? Did you (maybe automatically) decline some offered updates of configuration files? $ ls -l /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ total 16 -rw--- 1 root root 2789 2005-10-22 18:11 00updmap.cfg -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2787 2005-10-22 18:17 00updmap.cfg.dpkg-dist -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2623 2005-10-19 16:10 10tetex-base.cfg -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1314 2005-10-19 16:11 20tetex-extra.cfg.dpkg-new Ah, that can probably explain everything. You probably didn't accept the updates for 00updmap.cfg and 20tetex-extra.cfg (the former with ucf, I think; the latter is a conffile). Please: 1. Backup your old files if you customized them somehow. 2. Run: # mv 00updmap.cfg.dpkg-dist 00updmap.cfg # mv 20tetex-extra.cfg.dpkg-new 20tetex-extra.cfg # dpkg --configure -a -- Florent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335303: tetex-bin: failed to install: updmap error
Sebastien Helleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: $ ls -l /usr/share/texmf/dvips/ total 52 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 antp drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 antt drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-23 02:13 base drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 bluesky lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 16 2005-10-22 18:08 config - /etc/texmf/dvips drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-23 02:13 gsftopk drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 misc drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 omega drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 pl drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 psfrag drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 pstricks drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 qfonts drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 tetex drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 xypic Fine. $ dpkg -S dvips35.map tetex-base: /etc/texmf/map/dvips/tetex/dvips35.map OK. $ dpkg -S pdftex35.map tetex-base: /etc/texmf/map/dvips/tetex/pdftex35.map OK. $ ls -l /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map total 4 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22 2005-10-22 18:08 dvipdfm - /etc/texmf/map/dvipdfm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20 2005-10-22 18:08 dvips - /etc/texmf/map/dvips drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 fontname lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21 2005-10-22 18:08 pdftex - /etc/texmf/map/pdftex Good. Presumably, the problem was located (only) in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ as suspected by Ralf. -- Florent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#298709: chrony: just segfaults on amd64
Thank you for your report. I expect to soon upload a version with a slightly different patch. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334001: Reassigning python-vte import error to pygtk
forwarded 334001 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313454 thanks Hi, This is a python 2.3/2.4 issue, rebuilding python-vte with python 2.4 permits using python-vte with python 2.4. I'm discussing this with pygtk's upsream for now. Cheers, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335303: tetex-bin: failed to install: updmap error
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 13:45 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 12:12:51PM +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote: Thanks for reporting. From which version did you upgrade? I think from 3.0-10. Where there any problems with version 3.0-10? What is the output of 'ls /etc/texmf/updmap.d/'? Did you (maybe automatically) decline some offered updates of configuration files? $ ls -l /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ total 16 -rw--- 1 root root 2789 2005-10-22 18:11 00updmap.cfg -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2787 2005-10-22 18:17 00updmap.cfg.dpkg-dist -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2623 2005-10-19 16:10 10tetex-base.cfg -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1314 2005-10-19 16:11 20tetex-extra.cfg.dpkg-new If I answered to some questions about files update, I think I answered yes (to overwrite), but not sure. Hmm, what's the difference between /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg and /etc/texmf/updmap.d/00updmap.cfg.dpkg-dist? This looks like a variant of #335210. Does that link $ ls -ld /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-10-20 18:59 /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/dvips - /etc/texmf/map/dvips exist on your system? Yes this link exists. On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 13:49 +0200, Sebastien Helleu wrote: $ dpkg -S dvips35.map tetex-base: /etc/texmf/map/dvips/tetex/dvips35.map [...] $ dpkg -S pdftex35.map tetex-base: /etc/texmf/map/dvips/tetex/pdftex35.map [...] $ ls -l /usr/share/texmf/fonts/map total 4 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22 2005-10-22 18:08 dvipdfm - /etc/texmf/map/dvipdfm lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20 2005-10-22 18:08 dvips - /etc/texmf/map/dvips drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2005-10-22 18:08 fontname lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21 2005-10-22 18:08 pdftex - /etc/texmf/map/pdftex Ok, all that looks correct. Maybe the search path for mapfiles is incorrect. What's the output of 'ls -l /etc/texmf/texmf.d' and 'grep TEXFONTMAPS /etc/texmf/texmf.cnf'? cheerio ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Reassigning python-vte import error to pygtk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign #334001 pygtk 2.6.3-1 Bug#334001: Importing vte in python doesn't work Bug#334668: ImportError while trying to import the vte module Bug reassigned from package `python-vte' to `pygtk'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Reassigning python-vte import error to pygtk
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 334001 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313454 Bug#334001: Importing vte in python doesn't work Bug#334668: ImportError while trying to import the vte module Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313454. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: tcl8.4: tclcurl FTBFS because tclsh SEGVs on hppa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 334898 grave Bug#334898: tcl8.4: tclcurl FTBFS because tclsh SEGVs on hppa Severity set to `grave'. retitle 334898 tcl8.4: tclsh SEGVs on hppa Bug#334898: tcl8.4: tclcurl FTBFS because tclsh SEGVs on hppa Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335344: marked as done (/usr/bin/apt-get: Unable to install libgtk2.0-dev, dependencies issue)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:41:20 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335344: /usr/bin/apt-get: Unable to install libgtk2.0-dev, dependencies issue has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 12:16:30 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 05:16:30 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETem5-NH-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 05:16:29 -0700 Received: from 062016211130.customer.alfanett.no (localhost.localdomain) [62.16.211.130] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ETem3-0002Wc-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:16:27 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vegard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: /usr/bin/apt-get: Unable to install libgtk2.0-dev, dependencies issue X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:57:31 +0200 X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: apt Version: 0.5.28.6 Severity: grave File: /usr/bin/apt-get Justification: renders package unusable When trying to install the package libgtk2.0-dev, apt stops at this errormessage: # apt-get install libgtk2.0-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgtk2.0-dev: Depends: libpango1.0-dev (= 1.4.0-3) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libx11-dev but it is not going to be installed or xlibs-dev but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages How to solve this problem? -- Package-specific info: -- apt-config dump -- APT ; APT::Architecture i386; APT::Build-Essential ; APT::Build-Essential:: build-essential; Dir /; Dir::State var/lib/apt/; Dir::State::lists lists/; Dir::State::cdroms cdroms.list; Dir::State::userstatus status.user; Dir::State::status /var/lib/dpkg/status; Dir::Cache var/cache/apt/; Dir::Cache::archives archives/; Dir::Cache::srcpkgcache srcpkgcache.bin; Dir::Cache::pkgcache pkgcache.bin; Dir::Etc etc/apt/; Dir::Etc::sourcelist sources.list; Dir::Etc::vendorlist vendors.list; Dir::Etc::vendorparts vendors.list.d; Dir::Etc::main apt.conf; Dir::Etc::parts apt.conf.d; Dir::Etc::preferences preferences; Dir::Bin ; Dir::Bin::methods /usr/lib/apt/methods; Dir::Bin::dpkg /usr/bin/dpkg; DPkg ; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs ; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .* ok installed'; then /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt || ( test $? -ne 10 || exit 10; echo 'Warning: apt-listbugs exited abnormally, hit enter key to continue.' 12 ; read a /dev/tty ); fi; DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs:: /usr/sbin/dpkg-preconfigure --apt || true; -- (no /etc/apt/preferences present) -- -- /etc/apt/sources.list -- #deb file:///cdrom/ sarge main deb http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian/ sarge main deb-src http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian/ sarge main # Sikkerhetsoppdateringer deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main # Mplayer - maa hete testing/stable ikke sarge deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ stable main # Mplayer plugin mozilla # deb http://marillat.free.fr/ sarge main -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686 Locale: LANG=no_NO, LC_CTYPE=no_NO (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages apt depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
Bug#328875: install -f doesn't fix but kernel install depends on udev install
Package: udev Version: 0.056-3 Followup-For: Bug #328875 Perhaps I'm missing something, but I seem to be in an infinite loop. I can't finish the udev upgrade without kernel = 2.6.12, but I can't upgrade my kernel until the udev problem is fixed. astra:/var/lib/dpkg/info# apt-get -f install Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Correcting dependencies... Done The following extra packages will be installed: udev The following packages will be upgraded: udev 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 156 not upgraded. 53 not fully installed or removed. Need to get 0B/300kB of archives. After unpacking 242kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] (Reading database ... 151258 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace udev 0.056-3 (using .../archives/udev_0.070-2_i386.deb) ... udev requires a kernel = 2.6.12, upgrade aborted. dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.070-2_i386.deb (--unpack): subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/udev_0.070-2_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) astra:/var/lib/dpkg/info# apt-get install kernel-image-2.6-686 Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: The following packages have unmet dependencies: hal: Depends: udev (= 0.063) but 0.056-3 is to be installed kernel-image-2.6-686: Depends: linux-image-2.6-686 but it is not going to be installed E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt-get -f install' with no packages (or specify a solution). astra:/var/lib/dpkg/info# uname -a Linux astra 2.6.8-2-686 #1 Thu May 19 17:53:30 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux astra:/var/lib/dpkg/info# -- Package-specific info: -- /etc/udev/rules.d/: /etc/udev/rules.d/: total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-07-21 23:02 020_permissions.rules - ../permissions.rules lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2005-10-22 18:29 050_hal-plugdev.rules - ../hal.rules lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 2005-07-21 23:02 cd-aliases.rules - ../cd-aliases.rules lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 2005-07-21 23:02 udev.rules - ../udev.rules -- /sys/: /sys/block/hda/dev /sys/block/hda/hda1/dev /sys/block/hda/hda2/dev /sys/block/hdb/dev /sys/block/hdb/hdb1/dev /sys/block/hdc/dev /sys/block/ram0/dev /sys/block/ram10/dev /sys/block/ram11/dev /sys/block/ram12/dev /sys/block/ram13/dev /sys/block/ram14/dev /sys/block/ram15/dev /sys/block/ram1/dev /sys/block/ram2/dev /sys/block/ram3/dev /sys/block/ram4/dev /sys/block/ram5/dev /sys/block/ram6/dev /sys/block/ram7/dev /sys/block/ram8/dev /sys/block/ram9/dev /sys/block/sda/dev /sys/block/sdb/dev /sys/class/input/event0/dev /sys/class/input/event1/dev /sys/class/input/event2/dev /sys/class/input/mice/dev /sys/class/input/mouse0/dev /sys/class/input/ts0/dev /sys/class/misc/agpgart/dev /sys/class/misc/device-mapper/dev /sys/class/misc/psaux/dev /sys/class/misc/rtc/dev /sys/class/sound/adsp/dev /sys/class/sound/audio/dev /sys/class/sound/controlC0/dev /sys/class/sound/dmmidi/dev /sys/class/sound/dsp/dev /sys/class/sound/midiC0D0/dev /sys/class/sound/midi/dev /sys/class/sound/mixer/dev /sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0c/dev /sys/class/sound/pcmC0D0p/dev /sys/class/sound/pcmC0D1p/dev /sys/class/sound/timer/dev -- Kernel configuration: -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages udev depends on: ii hotplug 0.0.20040329-25 Linux Hotplug Scripts ii initscripts 2.86.ds1-4 Standard scripts needed for bootin ii libc62.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii makedev 2.3.1-78creates device files in /dev ii sed 4.1.2-8 The GNU sed stream editor udev recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335199: cupsys: FTBFS: Not using -fPIC to make shared lib.
Kenshi Muto writes: Hi, At Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:42:03 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: cupsys Version: 1.1.99.b1.r4748-1 Severity: serious Tags: experimental Hi, Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following error: Linking libcups.so.2... /usr/bin/ld: array.o: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `cupsArrayCurrent' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value The build log does not show the actual commands used to compile, but it probably didn't use -fPIC to make array.o and the other .o files. To make a shared library you need to be using -fPIC. For a static library you shouldn't be using it. I confirmed on my AMD64 but the problem isn't of -fPIC. Here is make -n result. echo Compiling array.c... cc -Wshadow -Wunused -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -O2 -fpie -I..-g -Wall -O2 -fpie -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -c array.c echo Linking libcups.so.2... cc -Wl,-soname,libcups.so.2 -shared -Wshadow -Wunused -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -fPI C -O2 -fpie -o libcups.so.2 array.o attr.o auth.o backchannel.o dest.o dir.o emi t.o encode.o file.o getputfile.o globals.o http.o http-addr.o http-support.o ipp .o ipp-support.o langprintf.o language.o mark.o md5.o md5passwd.o normalize.o op tions.o page.o ppd.o snprintf.o string.o tempfile.o transcode.o usersys.o util.o -L/usr/lib -lgnutls -lpthread -lz I searched a similar problem, but all of I can find is only old resolved binutils + pragma issue. Dear gcc team, could you help me? -fpie -fPIE These options are similar to -fpic and -fPIC, but generated posi- tion independent code can be only linked into executables. Usually these options are used when -pie GCC option will be used during linking. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334999: Not yet fixed
found 334999 0.23-3 tag 334999 patch thanks Sorry, but you made a little mistake again. While your code in debian/rules is mostly correct it misses the fact that DEB_HOST_ARCH is no predefined variable, you have to set it yourself. So please add something like DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH) Also your build-dependency on g++ isn't necessary, g++ is build-essential. Just adding the build-dependency for g++-3.4 on the mentioned architectures is enough. Attached is an alternate patch for debian/rules that is a little more elegant. It's a modified version of the one suggested in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg00020.html Just adding the line suggested above would suffice though, you don't have to use the patch. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ diff -Naur monotone_0.23-3/debian/control monotone-0.23/debian/control --- monotone_0.23-3/debian/control 2005-10-23 14:54:28.0 +0200 +++ monotone-0.23/debian/control2005-10-23 15:03:51.0 +0200 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Build-Depends: cdbs (= 0.4.28), debhelper (= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, libboost-date-time-dev, libboost-filesystem-dev, libboost-regex-dev, libboost-test-dev, libboost-dev, texinfo, libz-dev, - g++ [!arm !hppa !m68k], g++-3.4 [arm hppa m68k] + g++-3.4 [arm hppa m68k] Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: monotone diff -Naur monotone_0.23-3/debian/rules monotone-0.23/debian/rules --- monotone_0.23-3/debian/rules2005-10-23 14:54:28.0 +0200 +++ monotone-0.23/debian/rules 2005-10-23 15:03:42.0 +0200 @@ -5,12 +5,9 @@ include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk #include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/simple-patchsys.mk -ifeq ($DEB_HOST_ARCH,arm) -DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS = CC=gcc-3.4 CXX=g++-3.4 -endif -ifeq ($DEB_HOST_ARCH,hppa) -DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS = CC=gcc-3.4 CXX=g++-3.4 -endif -ifeq ($DEB_HOST_ARCH,m68k) -DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS = CC=gcc-3.4 CXX=g++-3.4 +GCC4_ICES_HERE := arm m68k hppa +DEB_HOST_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH) + +ifneq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),$(GCC4_ICES_HERE))) + DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS = CC=gcc-3.4 CXX=g++-3.4 endif
Processed: Not yet fixed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 334999 0.23-3 Bug#334999: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4 Bug marked as found in version 0.23-3. tag 334999 patch Bug#334999: FTBFS on arm/hppa/m68k: please use g++-3.4 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334835: marked as done (kdewebdev: ftbfs [sparc] error: expected class-name before '{' token)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:12:07 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334835: kdewebdev: ftbfs [sparc] error: expected
class-name before '{' token
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 04:56:56 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 19 21:56:56 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from blars.org (renig.nat.blars.org) [64.81.35.59]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ESSU3-0002qc-00; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:56:55 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
j9K4uorS023603
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:56:51 -0700
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
j9K4oFxP031912;
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:50:15 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j9K4oFr7031910;
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:50:15 -0700
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:50:15 -0700
From: Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kdewebdev: ftbfs [sparc] error: expected class-name before '{' token
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.17
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: kdewebdev
Version: 4:3.4.2-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
kdewebdev failed to build on a sparc buildd, but did build on my sparc
pbuilder. Perhaps a build dependancy is insufficiently versioned.
creating kmdr_editor.all_cpp.cpp ...
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/build/buildd/kdewebdev-3.4.2/./kommander/editor
-I../.. -I/build/buildd/kdewebdev-3.4.2/./kommander/widget
-I/build/buildd/kdewebdev-3.4.2/./kommander/widgets
-I/build/buildd/kdewebdev-3.4.2/./kommander/factory -I/usr/include/kde
-I/usr/share/qt3/include -I. -Ishared -Iinterfaces -Ipics -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT
-D_REENTRANT -DKOMMANDER -DDESIGNER -DQT_NO_SQL -DHAVE_KDE -Wnon-virtual-dtor
-Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align
-Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wno-non-virtual-dtor
-DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -Wformat-security
-Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common
-DENABLE_CVSSERVICE -MT kmdr_editor.all_cpp.o -MD -MP -MF
.deps/kmdr_editor.all_cpp.Tpo -c -o kmdr_editor.all_cpp.o
kmdr_editor.all_cpp.cpp; \
then mv -f .deps/kmdr_editor.all_cpp.Tpo .deps/kmdr_editor.all_cpp.Po; else
rm -f .deps/kmdr_editor.all_cpp.Tpo; exit 1; fi
/usr/share/qt3/include/qnetworkprotocol.h:58: warning: 'class
QNetworkProtocolFactoryBase' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/qfiledialog.h:78: warning: 'class QFilePreview' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:69: warning: 'struct QUBuffer' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:77: warning: 'struct QUType' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:104: warning: 'struct QUType_Null' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:287: warning: 'struct QUType_enum' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:307: warning: 'struct QUType_ptr' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:326: warning: 'struct QUType_iface'
has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:345: warning: 'struct QUType_idisp'
has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:364: warning: 'struct QUType_bool' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/usr/share/qt3/include/private/qucom_p.h:383: warning: 'struct QUType_int' has
virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
Bug#335363: libdjvulibre15: Unable to install libdjvulibre15
Package: libdjvulibre15 Severity: critical While trying to install the PDF viewer Evince, which depends on libdjvulibre15, I noticed that libdjvulibre15 is uninstallable and hence breaks evince also. Here is the output of apt-get. radio:/home/rkrishnan# apt-get install evince Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: libdjvulibre15 libpoppler0c2 libpoppler0c2-glib The following packages will be REMOVED: libpoppler0 libpoppler0-glib The following NEW packages will be installed: evince libdjvulibre15 libpoppler0c2 libpoppler0c2-glib 0 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 2 to remove and 584 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/2038kB of archives. After unpacking 5132kB of additional disk space will be used. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? (Reading database ... 129844 files and directories currently installed.) Removing libpoppler0-glib ... Removing libpoppler0 ... (Reading database ... 129825 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking libdjvulibre15 (from .../libdjvulibre15_3.5.15-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libdjvulibre15_3.5.15-1_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/djvu/osi/de/libdjvu++.xml', which is also in package libdjvulibre1 dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Selecting previously deselected package libpoppler0c2. Unpacking libpoppler0c2 (from .../libpoppler0c2_0.4.2-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package libpoppler0c2-glib. Unpacking libpoppler0c2-glib (from .../libpoppler0c2-glib_0.4.2-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package evince. Unpacking evince (from .../evince_0.4.0-1_i386.deb) ... Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/libdjvulibre15_3.5.15-1_i386.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335284: lessdisks-xterminal: unable to configure xserver-xorg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:41:03 -0600 Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: attached should be a patch adding crude xserver-xorg support for 0.5.3cvs.20040906-16 Thanks alot! - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDW45Qn7DbMsAkQLgRAuMuAJ4vqmL3Eu8IAM87W3jtpOicPigDtwCfZ3GH 5Vtll+Kqe6DJrMWt5OPWVaE= =dmQb -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Processed: severity of 335298 is normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8 severity 335298 normal Bug#335298: zvbi: strict arch:any-arch:all dependencies break binNMUs (uninstallable on sparc) Severity set to `normal'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335364: gfpoken - tries to put files in the home directory
Package: gfpoken Version: 0.27-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of gfpoken_0.27-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] install: cannot create directory `/home/buildd': Permission denied ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender' to `/usr/lib/blender/locale': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender' to `/usr/lib/blender/.Blanguages': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender' to `/usr/lib/blender/.bfont.ttf': No such file or directory cp: cannot create directory `/home/buildd/.blender': No such file or directory cp: cannot create regular file `/home/buildd/.blender': No such file or directory install: cannot create directory `/home/buildd': Permission denied install: cannot create directory `/home/buildd': Permission denied install: cannot create directory `/home/buildd': Permission denied ln: when making multiple links, last argument must be a directory cat: /home/buildd/.blender/VERSION: No such file or directory /usr/bin/blender: line 29: [: !=: unary operator expected ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//Apply_def.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/Apply_def.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//Axiscopy.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/Axiscopy.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//DirectX8Exporter.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/DirectX8Exporter.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//DirectXExporter.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/DirectXExporter.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//UVpaint05.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/UVpaint05.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//ac3d_export.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/ac3d_export.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//ac3d_import.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/ac3d_import.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//armature_symetry.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/armature_symetry.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//batch_name_edit.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/batch_name_edit.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//bevel_center.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bevel_center.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//blender2cal3d.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/blender2cal3d.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts/' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bpydata': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts/' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bpymodules': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//bvh2arm.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bvh2arm.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//bvh_export.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bvh_export.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//bvh_import.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/bvh_import.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//camera_changer.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/camera_changer.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//clean_mesh.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/clean_mesh.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//config.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/config.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//console.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/console.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//discombobulator.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/discombobulator.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//disp_paint.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/disp_paint.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//doc_browser.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/doc_browser.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//envelope_assignment.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/envelope_assignment.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//envelope_symmetry.py' to `/usr/lib/blender/scripts/envelope_symmetry.py': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `/home/buildd/.blender/scripts//fixfromarmature.py' to
Bug#335368: anon-proxy FTBFS with current openssl
Package: anon-proxy
Version: 00.02.39-7
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
I tried to rebuild anon-proxy on i386, it fails.
Please find attached patch to fix that.
Regards
Petr
diff -ur anon-proxy-00.02.39/CACertificate.cpp anon-proxy.new/CACertificate.cpp
--- anon-proxy-00.02.39/CACertificate.cpp 2003-11-05 17:47:09.0
+
+++ anon-proxy.new/CACertificate.cpp2005-10-23 12:33:49.0 +
@@ -91,12 +91,12 @@
return NULL;
}
-CACertificate* CACertificate::decode(UINT8* buff,UINT32 bufflen,UINT32
type,char* passwd)
+CACertificate* CACertificate::decode(const UINT8* buff,UINT32 bufflen,UINT32
type,char* passwd)
{
if(buff==NULL)
return NULL;
X509* tmpCert=NULL;
- UINT8* tmp;
+ const UINT8* tmp;
PKCS12* tmpPKCS12;
switch(type)
{
diff -ur anon-proxy-00.02.39/CACertificate.hpp anon-proxy.new/CACertificate.hpp
--- anon-proxy-00.02.39/CACertificate.hpp 2002-08-06 15:02:55.0
+
+++ anon-proxy.new/CACertificate.hpp2005-10-23 12:34:03.0 +
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
return tmp;
}
- static CACertificate* decode(UINT8* buff,UINT32
bufflen,UINT32 type,char* passwd=NULL);
+ static CACertificate* decode(const UINT8* buff,UINT32
bufflen,UINT32 type,char* passwd=NULL);
static CACertificate* decode(const DOM_Nodenode,UINT32
type,char* passwd=NULL);
SINT32 encode(UINT8* buff,UINT32* bufflen,UINT32 type);
SINT32 encode(DOM_DocumentFragment
docFrag,DOM_Document doc);
diff -ur anon-proxy-00.02.39/CAIPList.cpp anon-proxy.new/CAIPList.cpp
--- anon-proxy-00.02.39/CAIPList.cpp2003-08-19 18:26:07.0 +
+++ anon-proxy.new/CAIPList.cpp 2005-10-23 12:36:37.0 +
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include CAIPList.hpp
#include CAMsg.hpp
#include CAUtil.hpp
+#include openssl/md5.h
/** Constructs an empty CAIPList.
* The default number #MAXIP_CONNECTIONS of allowed insertions is used*/
CAIPList::CAIPList()
diff -ur anon-proxy-00.02.39/CASignature.cpp anon-proxy.new/CASignature.cpp
--- anon-proxy-00.02.39/CASignature.cpp 2003-12-01 17:15:43.0 +
+++ anon-proxy.new/CASignature.cpp 2005-10-23 12:37:23.0 +
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
return parseSignKeyXML(buff,len);
case SIGKEY_PKCS12:
- PKCS12*
tmpPKCS12=d2i_PKCS12(NULL,(UINT8**)buff,len);
+ PKCS12*
tmpPKCS12=d2i_PKCS12(NULL,buff,len);
EVP_PKEY* key=NULL;
// X509* cert=NULL;
if(PKCS12_parse(tmpPKCS12,passwd,key,NULL,NULL)!=1)
Bug#335365: printbill - build-depends against removed package
Package: printbill Version: 4.1.2-1.0.1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of printbill_4.1.2-1.0.1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 69 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper, libpng2-dev | libpng3-dev | libpng12-dev [...] E: Package libpng2-dev has no installation candidate Package libpng2-dev is not available, but is referred to by another package. This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or is only available from another source apt-get failed. Package installation failed Trying to reinstall removed packages: Trying to uninstall newly installed packages: Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping printbill ** Finished at 20051023-1054 Build needed 00:00:00, 0k disk space Bastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303705: penguin-command now uninstallable on non-i386
Thanks! I'll fix this in the next upload. I guess it is about time for that next upload. Absolutely. Hope you're OK, Karl. I'm OK, but sometimes a grave bug is needed to bring my attention back to my old games. I just uploaded a new version. Thanks for the heads up and sorry that it took me so long, Karl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334935: marked as done (using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334935: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 23:24:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 16:24:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailfarm.berkeley.edu (calmail-fe3.berkeley.edu) [128.32.61.106] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ESjlY-0005Lu-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:24:08 -0700 Received: from [169.229.99.128] (account [EMAIL PROTECTED] HELO localhost.localdomain) by calmail-fe3.berkeley.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 113512159; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:38 -0700 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BACD5C5380; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:41 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libcrypt-ssleay-perl Version: 0.51-4 Severity: important This is blah.pl: #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use LWP::UserAgent; use Crypt::SSLeay; my $ua = LWP::UserAgent-new(); $ua-get(https://www.verisign.com;); When running this simple test program, perl dumps core. (gdb) bt #0 0x2b8a4d09 in SSL_CTX_ctrl () from /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 #1 0x2b7632ba in XS_Crypt__SSLeay__CTX_new () from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Crypt/SSLeay/SSLeay.so #2 0x2ac59655 in Perl_pp_entersub () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8 #3 0x2ac51b3e in Perl_runops_standard () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8 #4 0x2abf9ddb in perl_run () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8 #5 0x0040180c in main () It coredumps similarly on i386. I believe this is a result of switching to libssl0.9.8. The test suite in the Crypt::SSLeay source also fails. Thanks, Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages libcrypt-ssleay-perl depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-2 SSL shared libraries ii liburi-perl 1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin ii perl [libmime-base64-perl]5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.7] 5.8.7-7The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis libcrypt-ssleay-perl recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 334935-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 13:48:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 06:48:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETgBp-0005cw-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334935: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: crypt-ssleay Source-Version: 0.51-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of crypt-ssleay, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc libcrypt-ssleay-perl_0.51-5_i386.deb to
Bug#334938: marked as done (libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334935: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 00:00:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 17:00:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mylar.outflux.net [69.93.193.226] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ESkKo-0001xc-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:00:34 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (serenity-end.outflux.net [10.2.0.2]) by mylar.outflux.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j9L00R1r002409 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:00:32 -0700 Received: from nemesis by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ESkV8-0002Q8-FG; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:11:14 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kees Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:11:14 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MIMEDefang-Filter: outflux$Revision: 1.218 $ X-HELO: localhost.localdomain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 10.2.0.1 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libssl0.9.8 Version: 0.9.8a-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable There is a seg fault when using Perl LWP to access https sites: #0 0xb7dc3942 in SSL_CTX_ctrl () from /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.8 #1 0xb7de07de in XS_Crypt__SSLeay__CTX_new () from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Crypt/SSLeay/SSLeay.so #2 0x080c0ad0 in Perl_pp_entersub () #3 0x080b95ba in Perl_runops_standard () #4 0x08064e43 in perl_run () #5 0x0805fd4f in main () For example: $ perl -MHTTP::Request -MLWP::UserAgent -e ' $agent = LWP::UserAgent-new(); $request = HTTP::Request-new(GET = https://www.osdl.org/;); $response = $agent-request($request); ' Segmentation fault -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libssl0.9.8 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an libssl0.9.8 recommends no packages. -- debconf information: libssl0.9.8/restart-services: --- Received: (at 334935-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 13:48:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 06:48:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETgBp-0005cw-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334935: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: crypt-ssleay Source-Version: 0.51-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of crypt-ssleay, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc libcrypt-ssleay-perl_0.51-5_i386.deb to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/libcrypt-ssleay-perl_0.51-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to
Bug#334938: marked as done (libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334938: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2005 00:00:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 17:00:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mylar.outflux.net [69.93.193.226] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ESkKo-0001xc-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:00:34 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (serenity-end.outflux.net [10.2.0.2]) by mylar.outflux.net (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j9L00R1r002409 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:00:32 -0700 Received: from nemesis by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ESkV8-0002Q8-FG; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:11:14 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kees Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libssl0.9.8: libcrypt-ssleay-perl seg faults via https addresses X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 17:11:14 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MIMEDefang-Filter: outflux$Revision: 1.218 $ X-HELO: localhost.localdomain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 10.2.0.1 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libssl0.9.8 Version: 0.9.8a-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable There is a seg fault when using Perl LWP to access https sites: #0 0xb7dc3942 in SSL_CTX_ctrl () from /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.8 #1 0xb7de07de in XS_Crypt__SSLeay__CTX_new () from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Crypt/SSLeay/SSLeay.so #2 0x080c0ad0 in Perl_pp_entersub () #3 0x080b95ba in Perl_runops_standard () #4 0x08064e43 in perl_run () #5 0x0805fd4f in main () For example: $ perl -MHTTP::Request -MLWP::UserAgent -e ' $agent = LWP::UserAgent-new(); $request = HTTP::Request-new(GET = https://www.osdl.org/;); $response = $agent-request($request); ' Segmentation fault -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libssl0.9.8 depends on: ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an libssl0.9.8 recommends no packages. -- debconf information: libssl0.9.8/restart-services: --- Received: (at 334938-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 13:48:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 06:48:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETgBp-0005cy-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334938: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: crypt-ssleay Source-Version: 0.51-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of crypt-ssleay, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc libcrypt-ssleay-perl_0.51-5_i386.deb to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/libcrypt-ssleay-perl_0.51-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further
Bug#334935: marked as done (using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334938: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Oct 2005 23:24:09 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 20 16:24:09 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mailfarm.berkeley.edu (calmail-fe3.berkeley.edu) [128.32.61.106] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ESjlY-0005Lu-00; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:24:08 -0700 Received: from [169.229.99.128] (account [EMAIL PROTECTED] HELO localhost.localdomain) by calmail-fe3.berkeley.edu (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 113512159; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:38 -0700 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BACD5C5380; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Joshua Kwan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: using Crypt:SSLeay coredumps perl X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:23:41 -0700 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libcrypt-ssleay-perl Version: 0.51-4 Severity: important This is blah.pl: #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use LWP::UserAgent; use Crypt::SSLeay; my $ua = LWP::UserAgent-new(); $ua-get(https://www.verisign.com;); When running this simple test program, perl dumps core. (gdb) bt #0 0x2b8a4d09 in SSL_CTX_ctrl () from /usr/lib/libssl.so.0.9.8 #1 0x2b7632ba in XS_Crypt__SSLeay__CTX_new () from /usr/lib/perl5/auto/Crypt/SSLeay/SSLeay.so #2 0x2ac59655 in Perl_pp_entersub () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8 #3 0x2ac51b3e in Perl_runops_standard () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8 #4 0x2abf9ddb in perl_run () from /usr/lib/libperl.so.5.8 #5 0x0040180c in main () It coredumps similarly on i386. I believe this is a result of switching to libssl0.9.8. The test suite in the Crypt::SSLeay source also fails. Thanks, Josh -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.4 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8) Versions of packages libcrypt-ssleay-perl depends on: ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-2 SSL shared libraries ii liburi-perl 1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI strin ii perl [libmime-base64-perl]5.8.7-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.7] 5.8.7-7The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis libcrypt-ssleay-perl recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 334938-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 13:48:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 06:48:26 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETgBp-0005cy-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 From: =?utf-8?b?Tm/DqGwgS8O2dGhl?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334938: fixed in crypt-ssleay 0.51-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:47:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: crypt-ssleay Source-Version: 0.51-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of crypt-ssleay, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.diff.gz crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc to pool/main/c/crypt-ssleay/crypt-ssleay_0.51-5.dsc
Bug#335317: marked as done (k3b is missing, but k3b-i18n is already there)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:57:52 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335317: k3b is missing, but k3b-i18n is already there has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 10:29:07 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 03:29:07 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETd6B-0001hu-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:29:07 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so525459wri for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:29:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cV+KEhfyLVJAJf0w/pUltQYt7SHg1Xb5JRSzRgRmcujvyS9CZvH3MBkX+w+UOHDvEnAt41olN3ydyDirUq87QY8iAFONkYA+ANnecilprWNNO5gJJFW0ss/F5dkpBBXuyI7Tn5iHpwcdhiuahbYi8Y5mdJmEgmkBUH8v8srN0sM= Received: by 10.54.118.5 with SMTP id q5mr2684493wrc; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [80.136.156.164]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 43sm1843261wri.2005.10.23.03.29.04; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:29:18 +0200 From: Jeremias Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: k3b is missing, but k3b-i18n is already there Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Subject: k3b-i18n: k3b fails Package: k3b-i18n Version: 0.12.4a-2 Severity: serious Justification: must *** Please type your report below this line *** The Package k3b is missed, but k3b-i18n is on the servers yet. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 335317-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 13:58:36 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 06:58:36 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx1.magmacom.com [206.191.0.217] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETgMt-0008Hj-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 06:58:35 -0700 Received: from mail2.magma.ca (mail2.magma.ca [206.191.0.214]) by mx1.magmacom.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j9NDwYn3021803 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:58:35 -0400 Received: from reykjavik (ottawa-hs-209-217-93-214.d-ip.magma.ca [209.217.93.214]) by mail2.magma.ca (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j9NDwMNM027732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:58:33 -0400 Received: from fmarier by reykjavik with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ETgMD-RM-Dv for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:58:21 -0400 Received: by reykjavik (hashcash-sendmail, from uid 1000); Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:57:52 -0400 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:57:52 -0400 From: Francois Marier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#335317: k3b is missing, but k3b-i18n is already there Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Request-PGP: http://people.debian.org/~francois/public_key.asc X-Hashcash: 1:26:051023:[EMAIL PROTECTED]::UHf7skILabsIiu7T:00 0001Hvqa Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Hi Jeremias, It appears that K3b has been removed
Bug#334180: dovecot-imapd: temporary solution
Package: dovecot-imapd Version: 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1 Followup-For: Bug #334180 If you need a working dovecot revert to version 1.0.alpha3-1 (26-Sep-2005) http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-common_1.0.alpha3-1_i386.deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-imapd_1.0.alpha3-1_i386.deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/dovecot/dovecot-pop3d_1.0.alpha3-1_i386.deb -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.30-vs1.2.10 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages dovecot-imapd depends on: ii dovecot-common 1.0.alpha3-2.0.1 secure mail server that supports m ii libc6 2.3.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8a-2 SSL shared libraries dovecot-imapd recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334938: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#334938: nmu patch
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:59:18PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
--- crypt-ssleay-0.51/SSLeay.xs 2003-05-27 23:55:02.0 -0700
+++ x/crypt-ssleay-0.51/SSLeay.xs 2005-10-22 23:57:45.0 -0700
@@ -105,6 +105,8 @@
static int bNotFirstTime;
char buf[1024];
int rand_bytes_read;
+
+ SSL_library_init();
if(!bNotFirstTime) {
SSLeay_add_all_algorithms();
I think it would be better to do this inside the
if(!bNotFirstTime) {
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303705: marked as done (Incorrect libpng build-dependencies)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:02:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#303705: fixed in penguin-command 1.6.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2005 08:22:35 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 08 01:22:35 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from heavensgate.debian.net [213.41.173.23] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DJol9-0003nu-00; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:22:35 -0700 Received: from silicium.ccc.cea.fr ([132.165.91.101]) by heavensgate.debian.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1DJoj3-0003p7-LF for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:20:25 +0200 Subject: Incorrect libpng build-dependencies From: Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 10:25:00 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: penguin-command Currently, penguin-command build-depends on libpng2-dev | libpng3-dev | libpng12-0-dev. On i386, it was built against libpng12, but on other architectures it makes it build against libpng10. This is wrong, as SDL uses libpng12. In some cases, it can make some partial upgrades from woody fail. Thus, please make the package build-depend on libpng12-dev only; libpng2-dev and libpng3-dev will be removed post-sarge anyway. Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `'[EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom --- Received: (at 303705-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 14:08:04 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 07:08:04 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETgQL-0001Du-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:02:09 -0700 From: Karl Bartel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#303705: fixed in penguin-command 1.6.9-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:02:09 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: penguin-command Source-Version: 1.6.9-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of penguin-command, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: penguin-command_1.6.9-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/penguin-command/penguin-command_1.6.9-1.diff.gz penguin-command_1.6.9-1.dsc to pool/main/p/penguin-command/penguin-command_1.6.9-1.dsc penguin-command_1.6.9-1_i386.deb to pool/main/p/penguin-command/penguin-command_1.6.9-1_i386.deb penguin-command_1.6.9.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/penguin-command/penguin-command_1.6.9.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Karl Bartel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated penguin-command package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 12:26:37 +0200 Source: penguin-command Binary: penguin-command Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.6.9-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Karl Bartel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Karl Bartel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: penguin-command - a missile command clone Closes: 182669 242353 273450 303705 Changes: penguin-command (1.6.9-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release * Upstream
Bug#333780: marked as done (Uninstallable due to C++ ABI transition)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:19:37 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#333780: fixed in libicq2000 0.3.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2005 17:24:12 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 10:24:12 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.235] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQ6oO-0006pD-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:24:12 -0700 Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j9DHO7hB031845 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:24:07 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: from [192.168.2.3] (68-173.241.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.241.173.68]) by outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (8.12.11/8.12.11/Skynet-OUT-2.22) with ESMTP id j9DHO4Tn031811 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:24:04 +0200 (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:22:39 +0200 From: Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051010) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Uninstallable due to C++ ABI transition X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: libicq2000 Severity: grave Version: 0.3.2-3 Hi libicq2000 is uninstallable due to libsigc++0c102 not being available anymore. Note that it is *not* enough to rebuild your package to fix this bug! You should also rename libicq2000 to libicq2000c2 and conflict and replace libicq2000. Cheers Luk - -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDTpff5UTeB5t8Mo0RAg92AJ0Tb30GqLjdKJ85iFHQ37CNHXDbvgCfeMl7 EE4/RUHtp/OOJhAxIPjf0Bc= =i9c9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 333780-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 14:23:14 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 07:23:14 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETghF-000205-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:19:37 -0700 From: Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#333780: fixed in libicq2000 0.3.2-5 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:19:37 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: libicq2000 Source-Version: 0.3.2-5 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libicq2000, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libicq2000-dev_0.3.2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libi/libicq2000/libicq2000-dev_0.3.2-5_i386.deb libicq2000-doc_0.3.2-5_all.deb to pool/main/libi/libicq2000/libicq2000-doc_0.3.2-5_all.deb libicq2000_0.3.2-5.diff.gz to pool/main/libi/libicq2000/libicq2000_0.3.2-5.diff.gz libicq2000_0.3.2-5.dsc to pool/main/libi/libicq2000/libicq2000_0.3.2-5.dsc libicq2000c2_0.3.2-5_i386.deb to pool/main/libi/libicq2000/libicq2000c2_0.3.2-5_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libicq2000 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the
Bug#333856: marked as done (initrd/initramfs: Step 2 ongoing, ramdisk-tools needs fixing)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#333856: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.32 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Oct 2005 06:44:32 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 13 23:44:32 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp7.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.24] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQJIu-0001oB-00; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:44:32 -0700 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0712.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AF40E1C000A0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:44:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pegasos (AStrasbourg-251-1-25-57.w82-126.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.126.215.57]) by mwinf0712.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 814011C000BB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:44:01 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sven by pegasos with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EQJ7w-AU-2y; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:33:12 +0200 Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:33:06 +0200 To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: initrd/initramfs: Step 2 ongoing, ramdisk-tools needs fixing Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: initramfs-tools Severity: Serious Hello, ... This is the second step in the linux-2.6 =2.6.13 ramdisk-tool resolution process. As you well know, 2.6.13 dropped devfs, whcih means initrd-tool cannot be used anymore, and we now have a choice of yaird or initramfs-tools, to make things nice and all, a proposal was sent to all of you and on debian-kernel, but only Simon Horman commented : http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/10/msg00232.html So, i am now asking that all ramdisk-tool packages which the kernel team will support implement the two following things : 1) Provide the linux-ramdisk-tool virtual package. 2) implement in their mkinitrd-compatible wrapper the two following options : --supported-host-version : will return 0 if the version passed as argument (for example 2.6.12-1-powerpc) can be used to generate a ramdisk, and 1 otherwise. This will mostly generally be 1 always for initramfs and initrd -tools, not sure about the 2.2 kernel case and such though, and some kind of 2.6 version for yaird. --supported-target-version : will return 0 if the tool know how to generate a ramdisk for the version passed as argument (for example 2.6.13-1-powerpc), and 1 otherwise. This will be =2.6.8 for yaird, =2.6.12 for initramfs-tools, and 2.6.13 for initrd-tools. Note, i mark those bugs as RC, since this is of primordial importance to get implemented quickly so that we may move 2.6.13 and beyond to sid in a timely fashion. Friendly, Sven Luther --- Received: (at 333856-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 14:17:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 07:17:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETgem-00018H-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700 From: maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#333856: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.32 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: initramfs-tools Source-Version: 0.32 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of initramfs-tools, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: initramfs-tools_0.32.dsc to pool/main/i/initramfs-tools/initramfs-tools_0.32.dsc initramfs-tools_0.32.tar.gz to
Bug#334467: marked as done (/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libm.so.6)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334467: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.32 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 06:05:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 17 23:05:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from jcd.fdn.fr (orcal.delepine.info) [80.67.176.3] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERkba-0003UZ-00; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 23:05:46 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orcal.delepine.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF8E1BA8E; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:46:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orcal.delepine.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (orcal [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31194-07; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:45:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.80.137.43]) by orcal.delepine.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8381BA89; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:45:50 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?iso-8859-15?q?Jean_Charles_Del=E9pine?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: /bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libm.so.6 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:05:06 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at delepine.info Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.31 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Hello, poucet:/home/jcd# mkinitramfs -k -o /boot/initramfs.img-2.6.14-rc4-git4 2.6.14-rc4-git4 Working files in /tmp/mkinitramfs_R9QJFq and overlay in /tmp/mkinitramfs-OL_mPaz0q poucet:/home/jcd# cp -rL /tmp/mkinitramfs_R9QJFq/ initramfs poucet:/home/jcd# chroot initramfs/ /bin/sh /bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libm.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory poucet:/home/jcd# ldd initramfs/bin/busybox linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000) libm.so.6 = /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb7eb9000) libcrypt.so.1 = /lib/tls/libcrypt.so.1 (0xb7e8b000) libc.so.6 = /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7d53000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7eed000) poucet:/home/jcd# ls -ld initramfs/lib/tls ls: initramfs/lib/tls: No such file or directory -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages initramfs-tools depends on: ii busybox 1:1.01-3 Tiny utilities for small and embed ii cpio 2.6-6 GNU cpio -- a program to manage ar ii klibc-utils 1.1.1-2small statically-linked utilities ii lvm2 2.01.14-3 The Linux Logical Volume Manager ii mdadm 1.12.0-1 tool to administer Linux md device ii udev 0.070-5/dev/ and hotplug management daemo initramfs-tools recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 334467-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 14:18:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 07:18:06 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETgem-00018J-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700 From: maximilian attems [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334467: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.32 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: initramfs-tools Source-Version: 0.32 We believe that the bug
Bug#332462: prestimel 1.0-3.1 uploaded to delayed queue.
tag 332462 + pending thanks Moi! I have now stuffed prestimel 1.0-3.1 as proposed earlier, into the delayed queue on gluck with a delay of two days. Regards, Daniel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335285: marked as done (kicker: uninstallable on ia64)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:17:13 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335285: fixed in kdebase 4:3.4.2-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 03:45:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 22 20:45:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.57] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETWnr-0004Bb-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:45:47 -0700 Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-105-238.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.105.238]) by ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j9N3ji7Z015018; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:45:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from neroden by doctormoo with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ETWnp-000241-5R; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:45:45 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kicker: uninstallable on ia64 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:45:45 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kicker Version: 4:3.4.2-3.0.1 Severity: serious On ia64, kicker has a binNMU, with an unsatisfiable exact same-version dependency on the architecture: all package kdebase-data. This prevents various packages like amarok from being built, since the buildds can't install stuff. The version dependency needs to be weakened/corrected. I'm not sure what the best way to do that is, since rebuilding all of kdebase on all architectures is kind of annoying. You might ask debian-release whether a sourceful binNMU should be done, or a total upload. --- Received: (at 335285-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 15:20:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 08:20:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EThaz-0005lG-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:17:13 -0700 From: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#335285: fixed in kdebase 4:3.4.2-4 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:17:13 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: kdebase Source-Version: 4:3.4.2-4 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of kdebase, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: kappfinder_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kappfinder_3.4.2-4_i386.deb kate_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kate_3.4.2-4_i386.deb kcontrol_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kcontrol_3.4.2-4_i386.deb kdebase-bin_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-bin_3.4.2-4_i386.deb kdebase-data_3.4.2-4_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-data_3.4.2-4_all.deb kdebase-dev_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-dev_3.4.2-4_i386.deb kdebase-doc-html_3.4.2-4_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-doc-html_3.4.2-4_all.deb kdebase-doc_3.4.2-4_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-doc_3.4.2-4_all.deb kdebase-kio-plugins_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase-kio-plugins_3.4.2-4_i386.deb kdebase_3.4.2-4.diff.gz to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase_3.4.2-4.diff.gz kdebase_3.4.2-4.dsc to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase_3.4.2-4.dsc kdebase_3.4.2-4_all.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdebase_3.4.2-4_all.deb kdepasswd_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdepasswd_3.4.2-4_i386.deb kdeprint_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdeprint_3.4.2-4_i386.deb kdesktop_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdesktop_3.4.2-4_i386.deb kdm_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kdm_3.4.2-4_i386.deb kfind_3.4.2-4_i386.deb to pool/main/k/kdebase/kfind_3.4.2-4_i386.deb
Bug#335340: marked as done (urlgrabber: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found)
Your message dated Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:25:06 +1000 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335340: urlgrabber: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 11:49:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 04:49:34 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETeM2-EY-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 04:49:34 -0700 Received: from hertz.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:2e0:18ff:fea3:b80f]) by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1ETeM0-0004NN-Vs; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:49:32 +0200 Received: from aurel32 by hertz.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.54) id 1ETeM0-0002Aa-Ru; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:49:32 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: urlgrabber: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:49:32 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: urlgrabber Version: 2.9.6-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source From my build log: Automatic build of urlgrabber_2.9.6-1 on hertz by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 1.170.5 [...] Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), python2.3-dev [...] /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. #-/usr/bin/make clean python setup.py clean make: python: Command not found make: *** [clean] Error 127 ** Build finished at 20051023-1345 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] Purging chroot-unstable/build/buildd/urlgrabber-2.9.6 -- -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.4-1-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- Received: (at 335340-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 15:25:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 08:25:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from succubus.progsoc.uts.edu.au [138.25.6.6] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EThig-0007Ut-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 08:25:10 -0700 Received: from wildfire by succubus.progsoc.uts.edu.au with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EThic-0003zG-G9; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:25:06 +1000 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:25:06 +1000 To: Aurelien Jarno [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#335340: urlgrabber: FTBFS: make: python: Command not found Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Anand Kumria [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: locally generated X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on succubus.progsoc.uts.edu.au); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: urlgrabber Version: 2.9.6-2 Fixed in 2.9.6-2 already uploaded and installed. Thanks, though, for your bug report. Regards, Anand On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 01:49:32PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Package: urlgrabber Version: 2.9.6-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source From my build log: Automatic build of urlgrabber_2.9.6-1 on hertz by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 1.170.5 [...] Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), python2.3-dev [...] /usr/bin
Processed: prestimel 1.0-3.1 uploaded to delayed queue.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 332462 + pending Bug#332462: FTBFS: libmagick++ transition Tags were: patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335303: tetex-bin: failed to install: updmap error
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 14:17 +0200, Florent Rougon wrote: Good. Presumably, the problem was located (only) in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ as suspected by Ralf. Actually, I suspect that there is a similar situation in /etc/texmf/texmf.d/, ie, some configuration files from teTeX 2 are still used. This could cause a wrong search path for mapfiles. What I am wondering is why this problem didn't occur during the original 2.0.2 - 3.0 update. Also, why are dvips35.map and pdftex35.map still available in /etx/texmf/dvips? I thought these files are moved somehwere save on instalation. cheerio ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#300176: marked as done (basket: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Item*' to 'int' loses precision)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:17:04 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#300176: fixed in basket 0.5.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 08:44:36 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 18 00:44:35 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.223.12]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCD5v-00086E-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:44:35 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1DCD5t-0008Qu-Mk; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:44:33 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Andreas Jochens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: basket: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): cast from 'Item*' to 'int' loses
precision
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 09:44:33 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
REMOVE_IN_QUOTES autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: basket
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When building 'basket' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
item.cpp: In member function 'void Item::setSelected(bool)':
item.cpp:425: error: cast from 'Item*' to 'int' loses precision
item.cpp:426: error: cast from 'Item*' to 'int' loses precision
/usr/include/kde/keditlistbox.h: At global scope:
/usr/include/kde/keditlistbox.h:49: warning: 'class KEditListBox::CustomEditor'
has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
make[3]: *** [basket.all_cpp.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/basket-0.5.0/src'
With the attached patch 'basket' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/basket-0.5.0/src/item.cpp ./src/item.cpp
--- ../tmp-orig/basket-0.5.0/src/item.cpp 2005-03-09 18:38:27.0
+0100
+++ ./src/item.cpp 2005-03-18 09:27:19.831988575 +0100
@@ -422,8 +422,8 @@
if (selected == m_isSelected)
return;
- DEBUG_WIN QString(selected ? Add : Remove) + selected item +
QString::number((int)this) +
-; b.lastIn= +
QString::number((int)(parentBasket()-lastInsertedItem()));
+ DEBUG_WIN QString(selected ? Add : Remove) + selected item +
QString::number((long)this) +
+; b.lastIn= +
QString::number((long)(parentBasket()-lastInsertedItem()));
m_isSelected = selected;
if (selected) {
---
Received: (at 300176-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:18:55 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:18:55 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETiWu-0007VZ-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:17:04 -0700
From: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#300176: fixed in basket 0.5.0-4
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:17:04 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: basket
Source-Version: 0.5.0-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
basket, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
basket_0.5.0-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/b/basket/basket_0.5.0-4.diff.gz
basket_0.5.0-4.dsc
to pool/main/b/basket/basket_0.5.0-4.dsc
basket_0.5.0-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/b/basket/basket_0.5.0-4_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated basket package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN
Bug#335364: gfpoken - tries to put files in home directory
Hello, Thank you for reporting this bug. I had noticed that on several platforms the source failed to build. However, this seems to be a problem with blender. For details see bug #330920. I had noticed that it tried (and failed) to create some config files in the home directory, but that wasn't what caused the build failure. However, I didn't think of it as a problem, but of course it is. I fixed this by creating a temporary directory as $HOME, and removing it afterward. Looking at strace's output, it doesn't touch the real home directory anymore. I think it should really be fixed in blender, and I saw you filed a bug there already. Thanks. The new package is currently awaiting upload by my sponsor. Thank you for reporting this issue, Bas Wijnen -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#220056: marked as done (libavifile-0.7c102: Libraries contain undefined symbols)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#220056: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Nov 2003 22:29:06 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 10 16:28:57 2003 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.61] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AJKWm-0002u1-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:28:56 -0600 Received: from 24-136-9-34.na.21stcentury.net ([24.136.9.34] helo=localhost) by smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #4) id 1AJKWl-0001oz-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:28:55 -0500 Received: from robin by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AJKV7-0005fK-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:27:13 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robin Verduijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libavifile-0.7c102: Libraries contain undefined symbols X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:27:12 -0600 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Robin Verduijn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_9 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: libavifile-0.7c102 Version: 1:0.7.38.20030710-1 Severity: normal The libraries libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38 and libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38 contain undefined symbols. This is probably caused by not being linked against all of the libraries they depend on. The output of LD_TRACE_LOADED_OBJECTS=1 LD_BIND_NOW=1 LD_TRACE_PRELINKING=t /lib/ld-linux.so.2 \ /usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38 shows the following symbols could not be found: undefined symbol: _ZTVN10__cxxabiv120__si_class_type_infoE (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: __gxx_personality_v0 (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: __cxa_pure_virtual (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: _ZTVN10__cxxabiv117__class_type_infoE (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: _ZTVN10__cxxabiv121__vmi_class_type_infoE (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: _Znaj (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: __cxa_rethrow (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: _ZdlPv(/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: __cxa_end_catch (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: _Unwind_Resume(/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: __cxa_throw (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: _ZdaPv(/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: __cxa_begin_catch (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: __cxa_allocate_exception (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: _Znwj (/usr/lib/libaviplay-0.7.so.0.0.38) For /usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38 the output is as follows: undefined symbol: mjpeg_encoder (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: mjpeg_decoder (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: avcodec_init (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: av_realloc (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: avcodec_close (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: av_strdup (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: avcodec_string (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: avcodec_find_decoder (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: avcodec_find_encoder (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: av_free (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: avcodec_decode_audio (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: avcodec_decode_video (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: flush_put_bits (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: avcodec_get_context_defaults (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: av_mallocz (/usr/lib/libaviplayavformat-0.7.so.0.0.38) undefined symbol: avpicture_fill
Bug#318233: marked as done (avifile: FTBFS: please rebuild against latest libsdl1.2)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#318233: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2005 09:12:38 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 14 02:12:38 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mx1.fakembox.net (mailftr1.telerete.it) [217.148.122.41] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Dszlm-0004z4-00; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 02:12:38 -0700 Received: from localhost (mailftr1.telerete.it [127.0.0.1]) by mailftr1.telerete.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E0A38268 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailftr1.telerete.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailftr1.telerete.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26099-03 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:09:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bracetown.ildana.net (unknown [83.137.60.126]) by mailftr1.telerete.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0280038213 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:09:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bracetown.ildana.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF86C4C2B7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:12:12 +0100 (IST) Received: from bracetown.ildana.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bracetown [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26906-09 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:12:12 +0100 (IST) Received: from [192.168.1.129] (unknown [192.168.1.129]) by bracetown.ildana.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D59D4C2B6 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:12:12 +0100 (IST) Subject: avifile: FTBFS: please rebuild against latest libsdl1.2 From: Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Debian Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:13:52 +0100 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ildana.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at telerete.it Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: avifile Severity: serious Please rebuild avifile against the latest libsdl1.2 (1.2.7 +1.2.8cvs20041007-5.1 ). This has changed significantly due to the libslang2, aalib and xorg transitions, and drip will currently fail to build from source. rebuilding should fix this and drop unnecessary dependencies on slang. (due to aalib changes). Regards Alastair McKinstry --- Received: (at 318233-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:46 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETieh-T1-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 From: Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#318233: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: avifile Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-player_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-player_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-utils_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
Bug#327932: marked as done (avifile: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#324848: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:47:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:47:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy1c-0003Qj-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:47:48 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1Z-0002RN-Sb for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:45 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: avifile: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:45 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: avifile Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 324848-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETieh-T7-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 From: Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#324848: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: avifile Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
Bug#324970: marked as done (avifile: Does not document the copyright of source code properly)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#324970: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2005 08:12:24 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 25 01:12:24 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 148.red-213-96-98.pooles.rima-tde.net (javifsp.no-ip.org) [213.96.98.148] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E8CqV-mA-00; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 01:12:24 -0700 Received: from jfs by javifsp.no-ip.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8CqT-0005Ff-Oe for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:12:21 +0200 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:12:21 +0200 From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: avifile: Does not document the copyright of source code properly Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: avifile Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1 Priority: serious Justification: Section 2.3 Copyright considerations The only copyright statement in the debian/copyright file says: Copyright: GPL (see /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL) and LGPL (see /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL) That's plain wrong, those above are not copyright statements, they are licenses. The package fails to acknowledge who is=20 the upstream author (and holds (c)) for the source code it contains, which is a policy violation. Thus the severity There's plenty of copyright statements in the source code that are not acknowledged in the debian/copyright file, for example, - ffmpeg is: Copyright (c) 2000-2004 Fabrice Bellard et al. - ffmpeg/libavcodec/ppc/dsputil_altivec.c says * Copyright (c) 2002 Brian Foley * Copyright (c) 2002 Dieter Shirley * Copyright (c) 2003-2004 Romain Dolbeau [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ffmpeg/libavcodec/ppc/mpegvideo_ppc.c is: * Copyright (c) 2002 Dieter Shirley And so on, the debian/copyright file has to acknowledge and document _all_ of these copyright statements.=20 Regards Javier --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDDX1lsandgtyBSwkRAhyhAJ9RuPGtTu81BV5DqsycgcDdn57itACfTGVF oFUBx2T56Cg7sZ21rwvChGg= =7HNu -END PGP SIGNATURE- --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv-- --- Received: (at 324970-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:50 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETieh-T9-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 From: Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#324970: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: avifile Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to
Bug#324848: marked as done (avifile-player: Uninstallable due to dependency on libqt3c102-mt)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#324848: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2005 12:23:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 24 05:23:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.imars.net [64.62.144.114] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E7uID-0005Qd-00; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:23:45 -0700 Received: from toroia.hyrule.dyndns.org (modemcable205.170-37-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.37.170.205]) by smtp.imars.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7OCNFaE051977 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:23:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: by toroia.hyrule.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02A21CFE8; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:23:13 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frederic Briere [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: avifile-player: Uninstallable due to dependency on libqt3c102-mt X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:23:13 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: avifile-player Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Now that the C++ ABI transition is over, libqt3c102-mt has been removed from sid and replaced with libqt3-mt. avifile-player needs to be recompiled to be installable again. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-4 Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages avifile-player depends on: ii libavifile-0. 1:0.7.43.20050224-1shared libraries for AVI read/writ ii libc6 2.3.5-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-6 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.4-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Input extension li ii libxv16.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System video extension li ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m avifile-player recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed --- Received: (at 324848-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETieh-T7-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 From: Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#324848: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: avifile Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to
Bug#330012: marked as done (avifile: Need to move to new C++ ABI)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:08 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#330012: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Sep 2005 08:21:42 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 25 01:21:42 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EJRlW-0001wx-00; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 01:21:42 -0700 Received: from mail-mx4.uio.no ([129.240.10.45]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EJRlS-000313-E9 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:21:38 +0200 Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202]) by mail-mx4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EJRlM-0004Ci-7C; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:21:32 +0200 Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44) id 1EJRlL-0006FS-4S; Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:21:31 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: avifile: Need to move to new C++ ABI From: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 10:21:30 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-=-= Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.695, required 12, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, AWL 2.12, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DOMAIN_BODY, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --=-=-= Package: avifile Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1 Severity: grave The avifile library need to be renamed and rebuild according to the C++ transition. More info on the C++ transition is available from URL:http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/07/msg1.html and URL:http://people.debian.org/~mfurr/gxx/. Ubuntu already applied patches to do this, as well as getting the library to build with gcc4. I attach the patch from ubuntu. Applying this patch and rebuilding will close #321550, #324848, #327932, #300179, #318233 and #325435. I'll consider NMUing the package if it isn't fixed in a few days. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=avifile-ubuntu.diff Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Patch to move to new C++ abi and gcc 4. diff -ru avifile-0.7.43.20050224-debian/debian/changelog avifile-0.7.43.200= 50224-ubuntu/debian/changelog --- avifile-0.7.43.20050224-debian/debian/changelog 2005-02-24 13:25:02.000= 00 +0100 +++ avifile-0.7.43.20050224-ubuntu/debian/changelog 2005-08-25 14:37:06.000= 00 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,41 @@ +avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu6) breezy; urgency=3Dlow + + * Fixed the conflicts... + + -- Sebastian Dr=C3=B6ge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:21:54 += 0200 + +avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu5) breezy; urgency=3Dlow + + * Rebuild for slang2 transition + + -- Sebastian Dr=C3=B6ge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 24 Aug 2005 19:28:36 += 0200 + +avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu4) breezy; urgency=3Dlow + + * Rebuild for CXX Transition=20 + + -- Charles Majola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 31 May 2005 13:02:55 + + +avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu3) breezy; urgency=3Dlow + + * Make conflicts unconditional + + -- Charles Majola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 19 May 2005 13:49:02 + + +avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu2) breezy; urgency=3Dlow + + * CXX transition: +- Renamed libavifile-0.7c102 to libavifile-0.7 + * Fixed build-deps: depend on new C++ ABI libraries=20=20 + + -- Charles Majola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 18 May 2005 13:05:35 + + +avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1ubuntu1) breezy; urgency=3Dlow + + * Applied gcc-4.0 FTBFS patch from Andreas Jochens + + -- Charles Majola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 9 May 2005 15:54:47 +0200 + avifile (1:0.7.43.20050224-1) unstable; urgency=3Dlow * updated to latest ffmpeg * fix packaging (Closes: 252982, 259417, 295486) diff -ru avifile-0.7.43.20050224-debian/debian/control avifile-0.7.43.20050= 224-ubuntu/debian/control --- avifile-0.7.43.20050224-debian/debian/control 2005-02-24 13:46:22.0= +0100 +++ avifile-0.7.43.20050224-ubuntu/debian/control 2005-08-25 14:37:06.0=
Bug#321550: marked as done (libavifile-0.7c102: uninstallable due to dependency on slang1)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321550: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2005 04:52:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Aug 05 21:52:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from rozz.csail.mit.edu [128.30.2.16] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E1Gfc-xs-00; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 21:52:28 -0700 Received: from c-24-147-127-19.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.127.19] helo=kleph.csail.mit.edu) by rozz.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50) id 1E1Gfc-0007Nz-7V for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:52:28 -0400 Received: from cph by kleph.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E1Gfb-0003Rz-OA for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:52:27 -0400 From: Chris Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libavifile-0.7c102: uninstallable due to dependency on slang1 X-Debbugs-CC: Chris Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 00:52:27 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libavifile-0.7c102 Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Please recompile with libslang1-dev to update dependency. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3-cph1 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages libavifile-0.7c102 depends on: ii aalib11.4p5-28 ascii art library - transitional p ii libaa1 [aalib 1.4p5-28 ascii art library ii libartsc0 1.3.2-4aRts Sound system C support librar ii libasound21.0.9-3ALSA library ii libaudio2 1.7-2 The Network Audio System (NAS). (s ii libaudiofile0 0.2.6-6Open-source version of SGI's audio ii libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libesd0 0.2.36-1 Enlightened Sound Daemon - Shared ii libfontconfig 2.3.2-1generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-3 GCC support library ii libglib2.0-0 2.6.6-1The GLib library of C routines ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-7 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libsvga1 1:1.4.3-22 console SVGA display libraries ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxft2 2.1.7-1FreeType-based font drawing librar ii libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System Input extension li ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra ii libxt66.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Toolkit Intrinsics ii libxv16.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System video extension li ii slang11.4.9dbs-8 The S-Lang programming library - r ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-3 compression library - runtime libavifile-0.7c102 recommends no packages. -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 321550-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETieh-T5-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 From: Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
Bug#320883: marked as done (aalib transition)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320883: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2005 01:25:29 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 01 18:25:29 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1DzlX7-l8-00; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:25:29 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (68-67-225-150.chvlva.adelphia.net [68.67.225.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD8317DEE for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 01:25:29 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31CC06E0EF; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:25:35 -0400 (EDT) Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:25:35 -0400 Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:08:02 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: aalib transition Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: libavifile-0.7c102 This package depends on the aalib1 package which has recently been renamed to libaa1 and which is now a dummy package pending removal. Please update your packages to build-depend on libaa1-dev and link against libaa1. This is also an important pare of the slang2 transition. It will probably be as simple as a recompile. aalib transition info: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/07/msg00295.html slang2 transition info:=20 http://wiki.debian.net/?EtchSlang2upgrade --=20 see shy jo --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC7sdyd8HHehbQuO8RAp0rAKDZCtruXZ+sIV5FsLCXqe2si1lZzwCgzDnA BDc0JNLPTJYqZ116uzAtDIg= =VyzR -END PGP SIGNATURE- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- --- Received: (at 320883-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:47 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETieh-T3-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 From: Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#320883: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: avifile Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-mjpeg-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-player_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-player_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-utils_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/main/a/avifile/avifile-utils_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
Bug#327932: marked as done (avifile: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327932: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:47:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:47:48 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy1c-0003Qj-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:47:48 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1Z-0002RN-Sb for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:45 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: avifile: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:45 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: avifile Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327932-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETieh-TD-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 From: Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#327932: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: avifile Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb
Bug#334034: marked as done (kcheckgmail_0.5.4-1(hppa/unstable):)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:32:05 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334034: fixed in kcheckgmail 0.5.4-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 06:33:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 14 23:33:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.33] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQfbY-0005XA-00; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 23:33:27 -0700 Received: from mix.mmjgroup.com (mix.mmjgroup.com [192.34.35.16]) by mmjgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B0916EB1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:33:15 -0600 (MDT) Received: by mix.mmjgroup.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D68B390770; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:33:15 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 00:33:15 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: kcheckgmail_0.5.4-1(hppa/unstable): Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: kcheckgmail Version: 0.5.4-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of kcheckgmail_0.5.4-1 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 69 Build started at 20051013-0758 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.0), autotools-dev, kdelibs4-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, autoconf [...] /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.0.2/../../../../include/c++/4.0.2/bits/basic_string.h:278: warning: cast from 'char*' to 'std::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar ::_Rep*' increases required alignment of target type kcheckgmailiface_skel.cpp: In member function 'QCStringList KCheckGmailIface::_ZTv0_n36_N16KCheckGmailIface9functionsEv()': kcheckgmailiface_skel.cpp:57: internal compiler error: in cp_expr_size, at cp/cp-objcp-common.c:101 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions. For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions, see URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs. make[3]: *** [kcheckgmailiface_skel.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kcheckgmail-0.5.4' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/kcheckgmail-0.5.4' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppapkg=kcheckgmailver=0.5.4-1 patch for the NMU, based on http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg00020.html diff -ur ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/changelog kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/changelog --- ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/changelog 2005-10-14 13:22:18.0 -0600 +++ kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/changelog 2005-10-15 00:29:06.0 -0600 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +kcheckgmail (0.5.4-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * work around gcc-4.0 FTBFS on some architectures + + -- LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:28:30 + + kcheckgmail (0.5.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version diff -ur ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/control kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/control --- ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/control2005-10-14 13:22:18.0 -0600 +++ kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/control2005-10-15 00:29:05.0 -0600 @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Section: kde Priority: optional Maintainer: Jose Luis Tallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.0), autotools-dev, kdelibs4-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, autoconf +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.1.0), autotools-dev, kdelibs4-dev, libqt3-mt-dev, autoconf, g++-3.4 [arm m68k hppa] Standards-Version: 3.6.2 Package: kcheckgmail diff -ur ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/rules kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/rules --- ../../t/kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/rules 2005-10-14 13:22:18.0 -0600 +++ kcheckgmail-0.5.4/debian/rules 2005-10-15 00:29:05.0 -0600 @@ -15,6 +15,15 @@ DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE)
Bug#324848: marked as done (avifile-player: Uninstallable due to dependency on libqt3c102-mt)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327932: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Aug 2005 12:23:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 24 05:23:45 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.imars.net [64.62.144.114] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1E7uID-0005Qd-00; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:23:45 -0700 Received: from toroia.hyrule.dyndns.org (modemcable205.170-37-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.37.170.205]) by smtp.imars.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7OCNFaE051977 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 05:23:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Received: by toroia.hyrule.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02A21CFE8; Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:23:13 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frederic Briere [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: avifile-player: Uninstallable due to dependency on libqt3c102-mt X-Mailer: reportbug 3.16 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:23:13 -0400 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: avifile-player Version: 1:0.7.43.20050224-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Now that the C++ ABI transition is over, libqt3c102-mt has been removed from sid and replaced with libqt3-mt. avifile-player needs to be recompiled to be installable again. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-4 Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages avifile-player depends on: ii libavifile-0. 1:0.7.43.20050224-1shared libraries for AVI read/writ ii libc6 2.3.5-4GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-6 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.4-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsdl1.2debi 1.2.7+1.2.8cvs20041007-5.3 Simple DirectMedia Layer ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi66.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System Input extension li ii libxv16.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System video extension li ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System client libraries m avifile-player recommends no packages. -- debconf-show failed --- Received: (at 327932-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 16:38:51 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 09:38:51 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETieh-TD-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 From: Zdenek Kabelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $ Subject: Bug#327932: fixed in avifile 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:25:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: avifile Source-Version: 1:0.7.44.20051021-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of avifile, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to pool/contrib/a/avifile/avifile-divx-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb avifile-mad-plugin_0.7.44.20051021-1_i386.deb to
Bug#314157: marked as done (does not work in d-i anymore)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#314157: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 22:59:21 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 14 15:59:21 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DiKNN-0002zi-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:59:21 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (dpc6682244174.direcpc.com [66.82.244.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733FE17DE2 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 22:59:17 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0DCE76E12B; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:59:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 18:59:09 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: does not work in d-i anymore Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.12 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: debootstrap Version: 0.3.1 Severity: grave /target/debootstrap # cat debootstrap.log=20 local: 352: apt-utils: bad variable name /target/debootstrap #=20 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27 Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) Versions of packages debootstrap depends on: ii binutils 2.15-6 The GNU assembler, linker and = bina ii wget 1.9.1-12 retrieves files from the web -- no debconf information --=20 see shy jo --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCr2E9d8HHehbQuO8RAm+lAKC1d5tCU5149joPIUSdKwlp2RhUDgCg28q0 179jrn7fhzpCkIW6k9Nn2x4= =pxf0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0-- --- Received: (at 314157-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 17:17:53 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 10:17:53 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETjT1-0006E1-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#314157: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 21 Source: debootstrap Source-Version: 0.3.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to
Bug#314373: marked as done ([debootstrap-udeb] Breaks new installations)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#314373: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2005 23:05:17 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 15 16:05:17 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp-out4.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.137]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Digwf-0006mu-00; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:05:17 -0700
Received: from [195.240.184.66] (helo=strider.fjphome.nl)
by smtp-out4.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl)
id 1Digwe-0002LY-C5
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:05:16 +0200
From: Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [debootstrap-udeb] Breaks new installations
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 01:05:16 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary=nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH;
protocol=application/pgp-signature;
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: debootstrap-udeb
Version: 0.3.1
Severity: grave
Two errors in functions breaking new installations have been confirmed
testing debootstrap udeb in sid during an emulated S/390 installation.
The following 2 changes will fix them.
=3D=3D=3D
=20
local totaldebs=3D0
=2D local leftoverdebs=3D$*
+ local leftoverdebs=3D$@
for c in $COMPONENTS; do
if [ $countdebs -ge $numdebs ]; then break; fi
=3D=3D=3D
fi
done
=2Decho 3 ${leftover# }
+echo 5 ${leftover# }
)
}
=2D--
local pkgdest=3D$TARGET/$($DLDEST pkg $SUITE $c $ARCH $m $path)
if [ ! -e $pkgdest ]; then continue; fi
=2D pkgs_to_get=3D$(download_debs $m $pkgdest $pkgs_to_get 31 1=
4)
+ pkgs_to_get=3D$(download_debs $m $pkgdest $pkgs_to_get 51 1=
4)
if [ $pkgs_to_get =3D ]; then break; fi
done 41
=3D=3D=3D
With these two changes base-installation finishes successfully, with
good progress information on VT1.
There _is_ another error from debootstrap at the very end:
The debootstrap program exited with an error (return value 1).
The logs had already been copied and the /target/debootstrap dir was gone.
I have not (yet) been able to trace this bug. At first I thought it could
be caused by the fact that I was running the script set -x, but the same
errors occurs without set -x.
The last lines in /target/var/log/bootstrap.log (with set -x) were:
+ info BASESUCCESS Base system installed successfully.
+ local name=3DBASESUCCESS
+ local fmt=3DBase system installed successfully.
+ shift
+ shift
+ [ yes ]
+ echo I: BASESUCCESS
+ echo IF: Base system installed successfully.
I will try to debug this further tomorrow.
Cheers,
=46JP
--nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCsLQ0gm/Kwh6ICoQRAgafAJ927AMeziERf8jyQQ1Vr4U524Gg9wCgzzaw
OourqyheoV5yXucHIDkKedI=
=Ty0z
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--nextPart1399542.tyP9Ym90NH--
---
Received: (at 314373-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 17:19:20 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 10:19:20 2005
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ETjT1-0006E7-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#314373: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 30
Source: debootstrap
Source-Version: 0.3.2
Bug#334506: marked as done (debootstrap unable to build etch chroot, looking for non-existing libsigc++-1.2-5c102)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334506: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 12:10:03 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 05:10:03 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERqI7-0001e1-00; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 05:10:03 -0700 Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERqI3-0002rb-0X for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:09:59 +0200 Received: from diskless.uio.no ([129.240.186.27]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERqH0-0007yV-IE; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:08:54 +0200 Received: from pre by diskless.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44) id 1ERqH0-00046i-H9; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:08:54 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debootstrap unable to build etch chroot, looking for non-existing libsigc++-1.2-5c102 From: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:08:54 +0200 X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.225, required 12, autolearn=disabled, AWL 0.78, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: debootstrap Version: 0.3.1.7 Severity: grave A new version of apt just made it into etch. This make it impossible to use debootstrap to generate an etch chroot, as the libsigc++-1.2-5c102 package is no longer in etch, but it is expected by debootstrap. When running debootstrap, this error occurs: I: Retrieving Release I: Retrieving Packages I: Validating Packages I: Resolving dependencies of required packages... I: Resolving dependencies of base packages... I: Found additional required dependencies: gcc-4.0-base libdb4.3 libselinux1 libsepol1 libslang2 libstdc++6 lsb-base I: Found additional base dependencies: libsigc++-1.2-5c2 I: Checking component main on http://http.us.debian.org/debian... E: Couldn't find these debs: libsigc++-1.2-5c102 The list of base packages in /usr/lib/debootstrap/scripts/etch need to be trimmed to remove libsigc++-1.2-5c102, and perhaps replace it with libsigc++-1.2-5c2 or just leave it to the dependency tracking to handle the library. Severity grave, as this make debootstrap completely unusable for all trying to generate a debian/testing environment. --- Received: (at 334506-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 17:17:44 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 10:17:44 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETjT1-0006Er-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334506: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: debootstrap Source-Version: 0.3.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of debootstrap, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_0.3.2_powerpc.udeb debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2.dsc debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2.tar.gz debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb to pool/main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_0.3.2_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen
Bug#334521: marked as done (deboostrap should enable apt archive checking)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334521: fixed in debootstrap 0.3.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 14:02:52 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 07:02:52 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ERs3G-0002rg-00; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:02:50 -0700 Received: from mail-mx4.uio.no ([129.240.10.45]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERs3C-0007i3-C1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:02:46 +0200 Received: from diskless.uio.no ([129.240.186.27]) by mail-mx4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ERs39-00012X-7z; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:02:43 +0200 Received: from pre by diskless.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44) id 1ERs39-0005hV-7D; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:02:43 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: deboostrap should enable apt archive checking From: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:02:43 +0200 X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.296, required 12, autolearn=disabled, AWL 0.70, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: deboostrap Version: 0.3.1.7 When building a new etch chroot, the generated environment is unable to install new packages using APT. This is because of the new apt version entering etch. After applying a workaround for #334506 (--exclude=libsigc++-1.2-5c102), I run into this problem: # debootstrap --resolve-deps --exclude=libsigc++-1.2-5c102 etch \ /tmp/chroot-etch http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian \ echo deb http://ftp.no.debian.org/debian etch main /tmp/chroot-etch/etc/apt/sources.list \ chroot /tmp/chroot-etch apt-get update chroot /tmp/chroot-etch apt-get -y install deborphan I: Validating Packages I: Resolving dependencies of required packages... I: Resolving dependencies of base packages... [...] Get:3 http://ftp.no.debian.org etch/main Packages [3464kB] Fetched 3500kB in 1s (2696kB/s) Reading package lists... Done W: GPG error: http://ftp.no.debian.org etch Release: Could not execute /usr/bin/gpgv to verify signature (is gnupg installed?) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: dialog The following NEW packages will be installed: deborphan dialog 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 250kB of archives. After unpacking 987kB of additional disk space will be used. WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! dialog deborphan E: There are problems and -y was used without --force-yes # A workaround is to install gnupg in the chroot (--include=gnupg to debootstrap), and then run 'apt-key add /usr/share/apt/debian-archive.gpg' in the chroot to get apt to recognize the mirror signature key.q I suggest this or similar code is made part of the default debootstrap rule for etch. An alternative is to get apt to not complain about the lack of mirror verification when running apt-get, but that kind of defeats the purpose of adding the mirror checking. :) I've been told that ubunto solved this problem by installing gnupg on all installations. It might be a solution for debian too, though we might want to make a smaller gnupg package with only the verification programs, to limit the size increase of the base system. Installing gnupg increases the i386 etch chroot from 139MiB to 147MiB. --- Received: (at 334521-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 17:19:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 10:19:28 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETjT1-0006Et-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:17:07 -0700 From: Anthony Towns aj@azure.humbug.org.au To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334521: fixed in
Bug#335303: tetex-bin: failed to install: updmap error
Ralf Stubner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: used. This could cause a wrong search path for mapfiles. What I am wondering is why this problem didn't occur during the original 2.0.2 - 3.0 update. Also, why are dvips35.map and pdftex35.map still available in /etx/texmf/dvips? I thought these files are moved somehwere save on instalation. Hmm. Normally, in sarge, you have: % dpkg -S dvips35.map pdftex35.map dvipdfm35.map tetex-base: /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/dvips35.map tetex-base: /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/pdftex35.map tetex-base: /usr/share/texmf/dvips/tetex/dvipdfm35.map but tetex-base/README.Debian.gz (from sarge) says: , | | 2. Changes in handling of map files (unneeded files in /etc/texmf/dvips) | --- | | Font map files previously were installed as conffiles (i.e., | configuration files managed by dpkg) in older versions of tetex-base | and tetex-extra (e.g. in woody) in /etc/texmf/dvips. Since it is in | fact not necessary to change them, they are now treated as ordinary | files and installed below /usr/share/texmf/dvips. Because of Debian | Policy (and the way dpkg handles conffiles), the copies in | /etc/texmf/dvips will not be removed when you upgrade, although they | are useless. You can quite safely delete them (but then you won't be | able to downgrade any more unless you purge the packages). Any changes | you made previously in these files will no longer have any effect. | | It is usually a good idea to remove those files if you have not | changed them. You can use the script | /usr/share/doc/tetex-base/remove-oldmaps to do this. The list of files | is: | | antp.cfg antt.cfg pl.cfg | config.qf | ar-ext-adobe-bi.map ar-ext-adobe-kb.map ar-ext-urw-kb.map | ar-ext-urw-urw.map ar-std-adobe-bi.map ar-std-adobe-kb.map | ar-std-urw-kb.map ar-std-urw-urw.map bakoma-extra.map | bsr.map bsr-interpolated.map | lw35extra-adobe-bi.map lw35extra-adobe-kb.map lw35extra-urw-kb.map | lw35extra-urw-urw.map mathpple-ext.map mtsupp-ext-adobe-bi.map | mtsupp-ext-adobe-kb.map mtsupp-ext-urw-kb.map mtsupp-ext-urw-urw.map | mtsupp-std-adobe-bi.map mtsupp-std-adobe-kb.map mtsupp-std-urw-kb.map | mtsupp-std-urw-urw.map raw-ar-ext-adobe-bi.map raw-ar-ext-adobe-kb.map | raw-ar-ext-urw-kb.map raw-ar-ext-urw-urw.map raw-ar-std-adobe-bi.map | raw-ar-std-adobe-kb.map raw-ar-std-urw-kb.map raw-ar-std-urw-urw.map | raw-lw35extra-adobe-bi.map raw-lw35extra-adobe-kb.map | raw-lw35extra-urw-kb.map raw-lw35extra-urw-urw.map utopia.map | | Some intermediate versions of tetex deleted those files in maintainer | scripts (which was a bug). Therefore, if you used testing, unstable or | some backports after woody's release, they might not exist on your | system. | | Do NOT delete other files in the directory, they are still required. ` However, the preceding list doesn't contain dvips35.map nor pdftex35.map. Is it incomplete?... Second observation: if you look at the updmap-sys error messages posted by Sébastien, you'll see they are generated by 'mapWarn badLocation' for the first two and by 'mapWarn notFound' for the last one. This means that we were in the main 'else' clause of locateMapMigrate(). IOW, the new files were not found at all. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that Sébastien has .dpkg-new files in /etc/texmf/map/dvips/tetex/. -- Florent
Bug#335284: marked as done (lessdisks-xterminal: unable to configure xserver-xorg)
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:47:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#335284: fixed in lessdisks 0.5.3cvs.20040906-17 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 03:41:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 22 20:41:11 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.easystreet.com [69.30.22.10] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETWjP-0003Zp-00; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:41:11 -0700 Received: from waitron.freegeek.org (209-162-205-26.dq1mn.easystreet.com [209.162.205.26]) by smtp.easystreet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779323640B4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (waitron [127.0.0.1]) by waitron.freegeek.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C0063CF4 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from waitron.freegeek.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.freegeek.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14870-10 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (pcp05158478pcs.montbl01.nm.comcast.net [68.35.116.136]) by waitron.freegeek.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDFC63CE7 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 20:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 39AB893394; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:41:03 -0600 (MDT) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 21:41:03 -0600 From: Vagrant Cascadian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: lessdisks-xterminal: unable to configure xserver-xorg Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=Op27XXJsWz80g3oF Content-Disposition: inline X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at freegeek.org Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 --Op27XXJsWz80g3oF Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8 Content-Disposition: inline --jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: lessdisks-xterminal Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Version: 0.5.3cvs.20040906-16 lessdisks-xterminal has no mechanism to configure or run xserver-xorg. many of the scripts assume xserver-xfree86 or one of the older v3 X servers and corresponding configuration files. i have committed some code to handle xserver-xorg in cvs (both the 0.6.x branch and HEAD). attached should be a patch adding crude xserver-xorg support for 0.5.3cvs.20040906-16 live well, vagrant --jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=crude-xorg-support.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --- xbase/x_config_ltsp.orig2005-10-22 21:07:08.474936032 -0600 +++ xbase/x_config_ltsp 2005-10-22 21:08:44.534332784 -0600 @@ -171,8 +171,12 @@ esac ;; =20 -*) XBINARY=3DXFree86 +*) if [ -x /usr/bin/X11/Xorg ]; then + XBINARY=3DXorg + else + XBINARY=3DXFree86 + fi XOPTS=3D - make_x_link XFree86 $X_LINK + make_x_link $XBINARY $X_LINK ;; esac --jRdC2OsRnuV8iIl8-- --Op27XXJsWz80g3oF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDWwZOlPc63BPWGpkRArLSAJ0d6Rly2rDe+Fvq8Nhnc8I2Ud/AdQCfQYxl PabtSZuw+5GhoP5J2WwRjio= =tbf+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --Op27XXJsWz80g3oF-- --- Received: (at 335284-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 17:47:41 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 10:47:41 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETjw6-0002no-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 10:47:10 -0700 From: Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision:
Bug#335398: nvidia-kernel-source: fails to create /dev nodes with udev and = 2.6.13
Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 1.0.7174-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Since I upgraded to 2.6.13, nothing seems to create /dev/nvidia* entries for me, with the result that X dies on startup with the message failed to initialize NVIDIA kernel module!. The postinst generates files in /dev using mknod; this does not help after a reboot. I've talked to the udev maintainer, and his stance is that a) mknod in postinst is against policy (at the very least, MAKEDEV should be used instead), and b) the kernel module should have a dev entry in /sys (find /sys -name dev | grep nvidia returns nothing on my system), or install an init script to create the device at every boot. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335402: penguin-command: FTBFS: missing build-depends on libsdl-image1.2-dev
Package: penguin-command Version: 1.6.9-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi Karl, it seems you forgot a build-depends on libsdl-image1.2-dev, the package has failed to build on six arches so far. Automatic build of penguin-command_1.6.9-1 on garkin by sbuild/m68k 69 ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper, libpng12-dev, libsdl1.2-dev (= 1.2.2-3.1), libjpeg62-dev, libsdl-mixer1.2-dev (= 1.2.0-1.1), zlib1g-dev, automake, autoconf [...] checking for main in -lSDL_mixer... yes checking for main in -lSDL_image... no configure: error: Your system is missing libSDL_image! make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1 http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=penguin-command Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335220: [Pkg-doc-linux-devel] Bug#335220: doc-linux-text: [NONFREE-DOC] includes non-free documentation
On Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:23:40 +0200 Frank Lichtenheld wrote: [...] Thanks for this analysis. I will go through it before preparing the next upload. You're welcome. Some small comments: I don't yet plan to remove the GFDL stuff, will do that later in the release cycle... It's just too much documents and so I will only remove them when I feel it is really necessary. IMHO, you should begin contacting upstream authors ASAP, so that you have enough time to persuade them to relicense before we are close to etch release... Perhaps you could move non-free documents to a separate doc-linux-text-nonfree package, while you wait for the relicensing effort to be completed. Then each document would be able to be moved back to doc-linux-text, as soon as it's relicensed in a DFSG-free manner... I see the LDPL license as free unless there will emerge a real consensus in the project regarding the identify contributors clauses in various licenses. I understand your point of view. I personally believe that the right to distribute anonymous modifications should be granted by a DFSG-free work, but I admit there's not (yet) a strong consensus on this... -- :-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-) .. Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 pgp8bnWlY1zmr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#335403: libgmp3-doc: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL] includes non-free documentation
Package: libgmp3-doc Version: 4.1.4-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 According to the copyright file (and the texinfo file itself), the GMP documentation is released under the GFDL license (v1.1 or later) and hence does not comply with the DFSG. See http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html http://people.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/Position_Statement.xhtml for details on the issues that most debian-legal contributors see in the GFDL license. In order to solve this issue, upstream copyright holder should be contacted and asked for a license change (unlikely, since the copyright holder is the FSF...) Otherwise, the package should be moved to the non-free section, possibly leaving the (L)GPL'd demo code in main (in a separate libgmp3-examples package) See http://release.debian.org/removing-non-free-documentation for further information about moving non-free docs out of main. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.31 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#326784: w3-url-e21: [patch] broken SSL support
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David D. Smith) writes: Package: w3-url-e21 Version: 2001.11.08-9 url claims to support SSL transfers but the support is broken since the migration of the HTTP handler to emulating synchronous transfers with asynchronous transfers (which I believe was around the time of emacs 21). This patch should fix it. I'm not sure how to test whether the bug is fixed. Can you supply a test case? I just uploaded a newer upstream version of w3-url-e21. It has the patch against url-https.el already, but not the one against url-http.el. Are you sure that the one against url-http.el is correct and necessary? -- Ben Pfaff email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://benpfaff.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334759: efax-gtk: FTBFS on 64 bit arches: libintl.h:40: error: new declaration 'char* gettext(const char*)'
Thanks for letting me know. Seems that the file in the archive is not the one I created. (was acedently changed at my sponsor). To address this problem I've created version 3.0.6.1 at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/efax-gtk/ Please test it. If it's OK, I'll arrange an upload. thanks for all the help. Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:39:10PM +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote: Please test version 3.0.6-2 at http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/efax-gtk/ dpkg-source: error: file efax-gtk_3.0.6.orig.tar.gz has size 797348 instead of expected 893306 It seems the size has changed between those 2 versions. Kurt -- Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.Guides.co.il Debian GNU/Linux unstable (SID) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335429: xfs-xtt: Uninstallable - typo in postinst script
Package: xfs-xtt Version: 1:1.4.1.xf430-6 Severity: serious During installation I noticed following message: Setting up xfs-xtt (1.4.1.xf430-6) ... chown: `xfntserv:xfntserv': invalid user dpkg: error processing xfs-xtt (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: xfs-xtt E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up xfs-xtt (1.4.1.xf430-6) ... xfntsrv already exists. postinst script contains: if id xfntsrv /dev/null 2 /dev/null; then echo 'xfntsrv already exists.' else adduser --quiet --system --group --no-create-home --home /var/log/fontservers --gecos X font server --disabled-password --disabled-login xfntsrv if [ ! -e /var/log/fontservers ] ; then mkdir -p /var/log/fontservers fi chown -R xfntserv:xfntserv /var/log/fontservers fi Please notice, that existence of xfntsrv is checked and also xfntsrv user and group are added. Then chown tries to use xfntserv name. Regards Artur -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-generic Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (charmap=ISO-8859-2) Versions of packages xfs-xtt depends on: ii adduser 3.74 Add and remove users and groups ii debconf 1.4.58 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.5-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime xfs-xtt recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Well, it's a RC bug, makes package unusable.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 323884 serious Bug#323884: xfs-xtt: /etc/init.d/xfs-xtt is incorrect Severity set to `serious'. severity 330340 serious Bug#330340: A typo in the initscript file of xfs-xtt Severity set to `serious'. merge 330340 323884 Bug#323884: xfs-xtt: /etc/init.d/xfs-xtt is incorrect Bug#330340: A typo in the initscript file of xfs-xtt Merged 323884 330340. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 328333 is serious, merging 328333 335365
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7 severity 328333 serious Bug#328333: printbill: please rebuild against latest libpng Severity set to `serious'. merge 328333 335365 Bug#328333: printbill: please rebuild against latest libpng Bug#335365: printbill - build-depends against removed package Merged 328333 335365. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327610: marked as done (libabz: FTBFS: iptables.h:49: error: 'iptables_add' aliased to external symbol 'batch_add')
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#327610: fixed in libabz 0.6.2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 11:27:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 04:27:27 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from astra.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.58] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEPzb-0001aN-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 04:27:27 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id C6B8838115 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:27:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from Q.roeckx.be (dD5775F4A.access.telenet.be [213.119.95.74]) by astra.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29B73800D for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:27:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by Q.roeckx.be (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7B01826136; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:27:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:27:25 +0200 From: Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: libabz: FTBFS: iptables.h:49: error: 'iptables_add' aliased to external symbol 'batch_add' Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: libabz Version: 0.6.1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: gcc -Wall -Wno-trigraphs -Os -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fPIC -I/usr/local/include -I../include -DGETHOSTBYNAME -DGETSERVBYNAME -c -o iptables.o iptables.c ../include/abz/iptables.h:49: error: 'iptables_add' aliased to external symbol 'batch_add' ../include/abz/iptables.h:58: error: 'iptables_append' aliased to undefined symbol 'batch_append' ../include/abz/iptables.h:64: error: 'iptables_destroy' aliased to undefined symbol 'batch_destroy' make[3]: *** [iptables.o] Error 1 Kurt --- Received: (at 327610-close) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Oct 2005 23:17:43 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 16:17:43 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETp5O-0001o9-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:17:06 -0700 From: Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327610: fixed in libabz 0.6.2 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:17:06 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: libabz Source-Version: 0.6.2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libabz, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libabz0-dev_0.6.2_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz0-dev_0.6.2_i386.deb libabz0_0.6.2_i386.deb to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz0_0.6.2_i386.deb libabz_0.6.2.dsc to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz_0.6.2.dsc libabz_0.6.2.tar.gz to pool/main/liba/libabz/libabz_0.6.2.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libabz package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:53:54 +0200 Source: libabz Binary: libabz0-dev libabz0 Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.6.2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Abraham vd Merwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Abraham vd
Bug#335434: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h
Subject: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h Package: dcgui Version: 0.80-2 Severity: serious FTBFS with the following error: In file included from /usr/include/asm/atomic.h:26, from /usr/include/linux/sem.h:5, from callbacks.c:33: /usr/include/asm/cpu-features.h:15:35: error: cpu-feature-overrides.h: No such file or directory callbacks.c: In function 'decode_encoded_name': callbacks.c:6831: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'ascii2_to_bin1' differ in signedness make[3]: *** [callbacks.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dcgui-0.80/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dcgui-0.80' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dcgui-0.80' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 While this might be a bug in l-k-h, the package doesn't really need the header linux/sem.h anyway, the only thing it seems to use is SEMVMX. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335435: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h
Subject: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h Package: dctc Version: 0.85.9-2 Severity: serious In file included from /usr/include/asm/atomic.h:26, from /usr/include/linux/sem.h:5, from main.c:41: /usr/include/asm/cpu-features.h:15:35: error: cpu-feature-overrides.h: No such file or directory main.c: In function 'do_login_stage': main.c:662: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 5 of 'getsockopt' differ in signedness make[3]: *** [main.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dctc-0.85.9/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dctc-0.85.9' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/dctc-0.85.9' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 While this might be a bug in l-k-h, the package doesn't really need the header linux/sem.h anyway, the only thing it seems to use is SEMVMX. Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335438: libsvncpp-dev and libapr0-dev cannot be installed together
Package: libsvncpp-dev,libapr0-dev Severity: serious that means, that pysvn's build-deps cannot be installed anymore. Please coordinate, if these these packages should depend on libdb4.2-dev or libdb4.3-dev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#335439: vncserver: passwords over 8 chars not handled correctly
Package: vncserver Version: 3.3.7-7 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole vncserver lets me in without supplying the full password. To reproduce this: start vncserver: vncserver :1 whe prompted enter a password of eight or more characters start xvncviewer and connect to :1 when prompted enter the first eight characters of the password and hit enter You have been authenticated. It appears that any characters after the 8th are ignored by vncserver. If instead of entering the first 8 chracters and stopping you enter more, random characters you will also be authenticated. This was reported in #debian on freenode by dob1. I checked it and found that he was correct. If this is the expected behavior of vncserver it should be mentioned somewhere (prominently!) in the man page. I've tested this by connecting with xvncviewer, vncviewer and xtightvncviewer all from the local machine. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages vncserver depends on: ii dpkg 1.10.10Package maintenance system for Deb ii libc6 2.3.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgcc1 1:4.0.2-2 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.5-5 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-5 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii perl 5.8.7-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii vnc-common3.3.7-7Virtual network computing server s ii xbase-clients 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8 miscellaneous X clients ii xlibs 4.3.0-7X Window System client libraries m ii xserver-common6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 files and utilities common to all ii zlib1g1:1.2.1-1 compression library - runtime Versions of packages vncserver recommends: ii xfonts-base 4.2.1-3standard fonts for X -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334055: marked as done (zope2.7: security issue with docutils wrt RestructuredText functionalities (Zope Hotfix 2005-10-09))
Your message dated Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:50:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334055: fixed in zope2.7 2.7.8-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2005 09:13:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 15 02:13:49 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EQi6v-0006B7-00; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 02:13:49 -0700 Received: from [84.59.50.220] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (WEB.DE 4.105 #317) id 1EQi6Q-0006zu-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:13:18 +0200 Received: from jens by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1EQi6P-0001wx-Dq for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:13:17 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jens Nachtigall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: zope2.7: security issue with docutils wrt RestructuredText functionalities (Zope Hotfix 2005-10-09) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:13:17 +0200 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: zope2.7 Severity: grave Justification: user security hole Please see: http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/Hotfix_2005-10-09/security_alert A patch for 2.7 is available there. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8jens01-ifplugd-b44 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- Received: (at 334055-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Oct 2005 00:45:17 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 23 17:45:17 2005 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1ETpbS-0007t2-00; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:50:14 -0700 From: Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#334055: fixed in zope2.7 2.7.8-1 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:50:14 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: zope2.7 Source-Version: 2.7.8-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of zope2.7, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: zope2.7-sandbox_2.7.8-1_all.deb to pool/main/z/zope2.7/zope2.7-sandbox_2.7.8-1_all.deb zope2.7_2.7.8-1.diff.gz to pool/main/z/zope2.7/zope2.7_2.7.8-1.diff.gz zope2.7_2.7.8-1.dsc to pool/main/z/zope2.7/zope2.7_2.7.8-1.dsc zope2.7_2.7.8-1_i386.deb to pool/main/z/zope2.7/zope2.7_2.7.8-1_i386.deb zope2.7_2.7.8.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/z/zope2.7/zope2.7_2.7.8.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated zope2.7 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 23:16:22 + Source: zope2.7 Binary: zope2.7 zope2.7-sandbox Architecture: source i386 all Version: 2.7.8-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian/Ubuntu Zope Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Fabio Tranchitella [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: zope2.7- Open Source Web Application Server zope2.7-sandbox - sandbox instance for the zope2.7
