Bug#370644: update-grub exits with non-zero exit status
Package: grub Version: 0.97-10 Severity: grave Some invocations of update-grub's write_kernel_entry lack the full list of parameters, which cause the shift call in the subprogram to fail. As set -e has been enabled, the whole script is terminated at that point. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#366161: Querying for HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrStorageAllocationFailures.2 causes snmpd to use max CPU
reopen 366161 ! thanks On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 03:07:32PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It should be noted that the TESTING version works - the one in STABLE is broken. :) Oh! In that case, it's a clear reopen. I'm sorry, I didn't think of the version in stable. Good to know that it's fixed in testing, though :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#334816: marked as done (Uninstallable in sid on some architectures)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 04:02:14 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#334816: fixed in libgnome-java 2.12.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libgnome-jni Version: 2.10.1-1 Severity: grave libgnome-jni is uninstallable on i386, ia64, m68k, and powerpc because it still depends on libgcj4 there which doesn't exists anymore. Please upload a new version so it will get recompiled against libgcj6 (binNMUs are not a option because of the strict dependency on libgnome-java) Gruesse, Frank Lichtenheld -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: libgnome-java Source-Version: 2.12.2-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of libgnome-java, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libgnome-java_2.12.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/libg/libgnome-java/libgnome-java_2.12.2-1.diff.gz libgnome-java_2.12.2-1.dsc to pool/main/libg/libgnome-java/libgnome-java_2.12.2-1.dsc libgnome-java_2.12.2-1_all.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnome-java/libgnome-java_2.12.2-1_all.deb libgnome-java_2.12.2.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/libg/libgnome-java/libgnome-java_2.12.2.orig.tar.gz libgnome-jni_2.12.2-1_i386.deb to pool/main/libg/libgnome-java/libgnome-jni_2.12.2-1_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated libgnome-java package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:43:20 +0100 Source: libgnome-java Binary: libgnome-jni libgnome-java Architecture: source all i386 Version: 2.12.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Java maintainers pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Changed-By: Mark Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libgnome-java - Gnome bindings for Java libgnome-jni - Gnome bindings for Java Closes: 334816 359732 369989 Changes: libgnome-java (2.12.2-1) unstable; urgency=low . * Back-ported ubuntu changes, restoring original binary-package structure. Thanks to the ubuntu developers listed below. * Build with recent gcj. Closes: #334816, #369989 * Removed libgcj-dev build dependency. Closes: #359732 Files: 84bdc219a0afe0fb747e69a27d02e8d5 849 libs optional libgnome-java_2.12.2-1.dsc f8b9f11bb30277855d1ec03ea2beeb55 479555 libs optional libgnome-java_2.12.2.orig.tar.gz eb02b802d201251e96ec6482e099054d 2975 libs optional libgnome-java_2.12.2-1.diff.gz ffbfa1c43ddd69a6bee2cb676e5feb5c 316088 libs optional libgnome-java_2.12.2-1_all.deb 74a484c43c2f20c47ad705d868ab6fe0 234574 libs optional libgnome-jni_2.12.2-1_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEhV6wRIB09ZZvujwRAiECAJ9u7nw8Djng1s3PJQwTgNJAXY7MLQCgr4WE Ur69Nvx3FgOFGDtREvr9+DU= =7ufB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Bug#370701: vncserver: Xvnc (started from inetd for XCMP support) fails after recent dist-upgrade
Package: vncserver Version: 3.3.7-12 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Our development system runs debian testing; the developers normally log on using VNC. xinetd is set up with server vnc services (for various geometries); they run Xvnc (Xrealvnc) with the -query option so each connection gets its own gdm login). However, since a (partial) dist-upgrade earlier today, this has ceased to function - the connection is terminated immediately. This happened _before_ doing the full xorg upgrade (the font server upgrade came in as a dependency of another package, and I'm guessing it's at fault). Completing the full dist-upgrade did not resolve the problem. I did note that tightvncserver was removed during the upgrade, but since we don't use that, I didn't see it as a problem - if I had know that ALL vnc servers would break, I would not have upgraded (and again, the vnc breakage happened even before the tightvncserver removal was required by dist-upgrade). What can I do to get VNC access working again? Or alternatively, what steps can I take to dist-downgrade to a _working_ setup? We can (mostly) manage using plain old ssh connections, but it does have an impact on productivity. ++ Now I'll answer myself, because I found a solution while preparing this report. The cause of the problem is that Xvnc can't find some core things (rgb.txt and the 'fixed' font). These were relocated as part of the X11R7 upgrade. It's possible it can no longer talk to the new font server either (otherwise the relocations wouldn't matter to it because the font server would handle them). vncserver/vnc4server work around this by passing -co and -fp options to the Xnvcs they spawn. So the solution is to do the same in /etc/inetd.conf (or /etc/xinetd.d/myvncservice). Instead of /usr/bin/Xvnc -inetd -once -query my-x-host -geometry 1234x666 -depth 24 the command line needs to be (on one line) /usr/bin/Xvnc -co /etc/X11/rgb -fp unix/:7100,all other font paths separated by commas \ -inetd -once -query my-x-host -geometry 1234x666 -depth 24 (is there a cleaner way to do this, e.g. by putting those options in some config file Xvnc reads?) README.debian should probably be adjusted accordingly (the instructions there no longer result in a working setup). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages vncserver depends on: ii dpkg 1.13.19 package maintenance system for Deb ii libc62.3.6-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libgcc1 1:4.1.0-4 GCC support library ii libice6 6.9.0.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 Session Management library ii libstdc++6 4.1.0-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libx11-6 2:1.0.0-6 X11 client-side library ii libxext6 1:1.0.0-4 X11 miscellaneous extension librar ii perl 5.8.8-4 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii vnc-common 3.3.7-12Virtual network computing server s ii vnc4-common [vnc-common] 4.1.1+X4.3.0-10 Virtual network computing server s ii x11-common 1:7.0.20X Window System (X.Org) infrastruc ii xbase-clients1:7.0.1-2 miscellaneous X clients ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-11 compression library - runtime Versions of packages vncserver recommends: ii xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-3 standard fonts for X -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370739: reportbug: postinst fails
Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Hello, the post-installation script of reportbug 3.21 fails: Setting up reportbug (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# COLUMNS=72 dpkg -l python2.3 | grep ^ii ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-oriented la regards Mario -- reich sein heisst nicht, einen Ferrari zu kaufen, sondern einen zu verbrennen Dietmar Wischmeier signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#337358: Bug#337346: slib upgrade broken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello Rob and Thomas, This bug is assigned to libglade9 which has been removed from unstable. As a consequence, this bug should either be closed or reassigned. Bug 337346 (in your subject line) has nothing to do with glade, and is closed as of guile-1.6/1.6.7-2. Bug 337358 (to which you sent the email) doesn't mention libglade9 at all, and is not assigned to libglade9. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#302127: [debian-ntp] Bug#302127: Patch for NMU
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 13:17 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Why did you put an --oknodo on the start part of the restart clause? Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370636: gal0.x: FTBFS: cannot run test program while cross compiling (?)
reopen 370636 thanks dude On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:56:10AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Moreover, the bug suggests you were cross compiling, and all I can do is guess that, in fact, you were. I was not. Furthermore, this is easily reproducible using pbuilder. I'm closing this bug. If you want me to pay attention to it, you'll need to give me a complete bug report and not just a few lines from a run of configure. A complete bug report includes, at a minimum, a complete log of a failing run, together with all the surrounding context (environment, etc.) Attached. Cheers -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD Automatic build of gal0.x_0.24-6 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46 Build started at 20060606-0759 ** Checking available source versions... Fetching source files... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... Need to get 1325kB of source archives. Get:1 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main gal0.x 0.24-6 (dsc) [834B] Get:2 http://ftp.fr.debian.org sid/main gal0.x 0.24-6 (tar) [1324kB] Fetched 1325kB in 2s (624kB/s) Download complete and in download only mode ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: flex, libgnome-dev (= 1.4.2-4), gnome-common, gettext ( 0.14.5), libxml-dev (= 1.8.5), libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev (= 0.22.0-9), libgnomeprint-dev (= 0.37-10), libgnome-vfs-dev (= 1.0.3), libglade-gnome0-dev (= 1:0.17-4), debhelper ( 3.0.0), intltool, libgtkxmhtml-dev, libzvt-dev, dbs, binutils (= 2.13.90.0.18-1.6) [alpha] Checking for already installed source dependencies... flex: missing libgnome-dev: missing gnome-common: missing gettext: missing libxml-dev: missing libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev: missing libgnomeprint-dev: missing libgnome-vfs-dev: missing libglade-gnome0-dev: missing debhelper: missing intltool: missing libgtkxmhtml-dev: missing libzvt-dev: missing dbs: missing Checking for source dependency conflicts... Reading package lists... Building dependency tree... The following extra packages will be installed: autoconf automake1.4 autotools-dev bzip2 defoma esound-common gconf gdk-imlib11 gdk-imlib11-dev gettext-base gnome-bin gnome-libs-data gnome-mime-data gs gs-common gs-gpl gsfonts html2text imlib-base indent intltool-debian libart-dev libart2 libaudiofile-dev libaudiofile0 libbz2-1.0 libcdparanoia0 libdb3-dev libesd0 libesd0-dev libexpat1 libfreetype6 libfreetype6-dev libgconf-dev libgconf11 libgdk-pixbuf-dev libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 libgdk-pixbuf2 libglade-gnome0 libglade0 libglade0-dev libglib1.2 libglib1.2-dev libgnome-vfs-common libgnome-vfs0 libgnome32 libgnomeprint-bin libgnomeprint-data libgnomeprint15 libgnomesupport0 libgnomeui32 libgnorba-dev libgnorba27 libgnorbagtk0 libgtk1.2 libgtk1.2-common libgtk1.2-dev libgtkxmhtml1 libhtml-parser-perl libhtml-tagset-perl libhtml-tree-perl libice-dev libice6 libjpeg62 libjpeg62-dev libnewt0.52 liboaf-dev liboaf0 liborbit-dev liborbit0 libpaper-utils libpaper1 libpng12-0 libpng12-dev libpopt-dev libpopt0 libsm-dev libsm6 libtiff4 libtool libungif4g liburi-perl libwrap0 libwrap0-dev libwww-perl libx11-6 libx11-data libx11-dev libxau-dev libxau6 libxdmcp-dev libxdmcp6 libxext-dev libxext6 libxi-dev libxi6 libxml-parser-perl libxml1 libxpm-dev libxpm4 libxt-dev libxt6 libzvt2 m4 oaf pkg-config po-debconf ucf whiptail x-dev x11-common x11proto-core-dev x11proto-input-dev x11proto-kb-dev x11proto-xext-dev xtrans-dev zlib1g-dev Suggested packages: autoconf2.13 autobook autoconf-archive gnu-standards autoconf-doc dh-make defoma-doc psfontmgr x-ttcidfont-conf dfontmgr bison nfs-common imlib-progs cvs gettext-doc gnome-core esound hpijs db3-doc glade python libglib1.2-doc gnome-vfs-extfs gsfonts-other libgtk1.2-doc libtool-doc g77 fortran77-compiler gcj libio-socket-ssl-perl Recommended packages: libft-perl curl wget lynx imlib11 esound-clients gsfonts-x11 libfribidi0 orbit libltdl3-dev tcpd libmailtools-perl libhtml-format-perl libcompress-zlib-perl libmail-sendmail-perl debconf-utils The following NEW packages will be installed: autoconf automake1.4 autotools-dev bzip2 dbs debhelper defoma esound-common flex gconf gdk-imlib11 gdk-imlib11-dev gettext gettext-base gnome-bin gnome-common gnome-libs-data gnome-mime-data gs gs-common gs-gpl gsfonts html2text imlib-base indent intltool intltool-debian libart-dev libart2 libaudiofile-dev libaudiofile0 libbz2-1.0 libcdparanoia0 libdb3-dev libesd0 libesd0-dev libexpat1 libfreetype6 libfreetype6-dev libgconf-dev libgconf11 libgdk-pixbuf-dev libgdk-pixbuf-gnome-dev libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2 libgdk-pixbuf2 libglade-gnome0 libglade-gnome0-dev libglade0 libglade0-dev libglib1.2 libglib1.2-dev libgnome-dev libgnome-vfs-common libgnome-vfs-dev libgnome-vfs0 libgnome32 libgnomeprint-bin libgnomeprint-data
Bug#370746: libgmp-ocaml: uninstallable, depends on unavailable ocaml-nox-3.09.1
Package: libgmp-ocaml Version: 20021123-10 Severity: serious Hello, The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgmp-ocaml: Depends: ocaml-nox-3.09.1 but it is not installable E: Broken packages I guess ocaml-nox-3.09.1 should be replaced by ocaml-nox-3.09.2. Maybe a better dependency could be found, however. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: GID change was reverted
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 370684 2.02.05-2 Bug#370684: lvm2: creates device nodes as root:root 600 Bug marked as found in version 2.02.05-2. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337358: Bug#337346: slib upgrade broken
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:08:37AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: libguile9 has not actually been removed from unstable; see http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=namesversion=allexact=1keywords=libguile9. The link you post only lists libguile9 in _stable_. No, it doesn't. I can only wonder if you actually follewd it. Actually I made a copy-paste error: I did lynx 'http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=namesversion=all+exact=1keywords=libguile9' so I did not get the html data you provide, sorry about that. I see the following when I follow that link. What do you see? With your data I get Package libguile9 * oldstable (libs): libraries for Guile1.4 (guile, guilereadline, and qthreads). 1:1.4-24: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc * stable (libs): libraries for Guile1.4 (guile, guilereadline, and qthreads) 1:1.4-26: alpha arm hppa i386 ia64 m68k mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc * unstable (libs): libraries for Guile1.4 (guile, guilereadline, and qthreads) 1:1.4-26: kfreebsd-i386 But kfreebsd-i386 does not count since it use an external archive and the ftp-masters cannot remove packages there, so as far as the official archive is concerned, libguile9 was removed from unstable. Now, that we are back on track, do you know whether this bug should be reassigned or closed ? Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#365950: ntp-simple must be configured before ntp-server
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:59:39AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Does anyone want to put in a vote on which way to break the dependency loop? Basically, there are two ways to go about it: ntp-server Depends ntp-simple | ntp-refclock ntp-simple Recommends ntp-server ntp-refclock Recommends ntp-server Two, ntp-server Recommends ntp-simple | ntp-refclock ntp-simple Depends ntp-server ntp-refclock Depends ntp-refclock The first treats ntp-server as the well-known public package to install and the other two as implementation variants. This is a bit like the kaffe package, say. The second treats ntp-server as a sort of ntp-common package that gets pulled in by either package you install. The first seems to be a bit more user-friendly, because apt-get install ntp-server will do something reasonable. It also seems to have been the original intent, seeing that the user management is in the ntp-simple and ntp-refclock packages, which would seem to indicate that they were intended to be configured first. Note that the behavior that triggered this bug report already implies a preferred solution: with the current package set, there is one package that has to be configured before the other due to the user creation. If in doubt, that's the dependency I would suggest respecting. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370740: marked as done (reportbug: post-installation script error)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:03:58 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable Hi, during post-installation there are some issues with file /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, mainly due to bad indentation. I am attaching a corrected version of the file (for reportbug 3.21). HTH, Roberto -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: EDITOR=vim DEBEMAIL=[EMAIL PROTECTED] EMAIL=[EMAIL PROTECTED] DEBFULLNAME=Roberto Pariset ** /home/roberto/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 3.18 mode advanced ui text email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.18 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages reportbug recommends: ii python2.3-cjkcodecs 1.1.1-1.2 Python Unicode Codecs Collection f -- no debconf information reportbug_submit.py.tbz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.21.1 Yet more duplicate reports of the exact same issue... CNL -- Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.lordsutch.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#370739: marked as done (reportbug: postinst fails)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:03:58 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Hello, the post-installation script of reportbug 3.21 fails: Setting up reportbug (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# COLUMNS=72 dpkg -l python2.3 | grep ^ii ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-oriented la regards Mario -- reich sein heisst nicht, einen Ferrari zu kaufen, sondern einen zu verbrennen Dietmar Wischmeier signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.21.1 Yet more duplicate reports of the exact same issue... CNL -- Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.lordsutch.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#370739: marked as done (reportbug: postinst fails)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:03:58 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Hello, the post-installation script of reportbug 3.21 fails: Setting up reportbug (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# COLUMNS=72 dpkg -l python2.3 | grep ^ii ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-oriented la regards Mario -- reich sein heisst nicht, einen Ferrari zu kaufen, sondern einen zu verbrennen Dietmar Wischmeier signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.21.1 Yet more duplicate reports of the exact same issue... CNL -- Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.lordsutch.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#370729: reportbug: postinst problem
Package: reportbug Version: 3.20 Followup-For: Bug #370729 Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: reportbug E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Richte reportbug ein (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: Fehler beim Bearbeiten von reportbug (--configure): Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von: reportbug Drücken Sie zum Fortsetzen die Eingabetaste. -- Package-specific info: ** /home/daniel/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 3.20 mode standard ui text email [EMAIL PROTECTED] smtphost tirolinux.net -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages reportbug recommends: pn python2.3-cjkcodecs | python2 none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337358: Bug#337346: slib upgrade broken
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:25:06AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello Rob and Thomas, This bug is assigned to libglade9 which has been removed from unstable. As a consequence, this bug should either be closed or reassigned. Bug 337346 (in your subject line) has nothing to do with glade, and is closed as of guile-1.6/1.6.7-2. Bug 337358 (to which you sent the email) doesn't mention libglade9 at all, and is not assigned to libglade9. Sorry, I meant libguile9 libguile9 has not actually been removed from unstable; see http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=namesversion=allexact=1keywords=libguile9. The link you post only lists libguile9 in _stable_. No, it doesn't. I can only wonder if you actually follewd it. I see the following when I follow that link. What do you see? binw6PKqJbiwA.bin Description: html Thomas
Processed: severity of 370656 is grave
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 370656 grave Bug#370656: xbill: Please switch back to libxaw7 Severity set to `grave' from `important' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370576: acidbase: Remote File Inclusion Vulnerabilities
I have to disagree with the Severity of grave. To exploit you need to have register_globals set to on which has not been the default in years. We have released 1.2.5 which fixes the issue and a number of other things. It just gets under my skin when researchers find problems, elevate how serious they are and never notify the development team. Sorry for my rant, Kevin - BASE Project Lead http://sourceforge.net/projects/secureideas http://base.secureideas.net The next step in IDS analysis! On Jun 5, 2006, at 6:24 PM, David Gil wrote: Package: acidbase Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2006/1996 Advisory ID : FrSIRT/ADV-2006-1996 CVE ID : GENERIC-MAP-NOMATCH Rated as : High Risk Remotely Exploitable : Yes Locally Exploitable : Yes Release Date : 2006-05-26 Technical Description Multiple vulnerabilities have been identified in Basic Analysis and Security Engine (BASE), which could be exploited by attackers to execute arbitrary commands. These flaws are due to input validation errors in the base_qry_common.php, base_stat_common.php, and includes/base_include.inc.php scripts that do not validate the BASE_path parameter, which could be exploited by remote attackers to include malicious scripts and execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the web server. Affected Products Basic Analysis and Security Engine (BASE) 1.2.4 and prior -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#327049: wwwoffle: Restores removed conffile
On Fri 02 Jun 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Paul, what is the status with this package ? As a result of this problem, wwwoffle has been removed from testing. Unfortunately real life got into the way. I hope to upload a fixed version within 10 days. Paul Slootman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337358: Bug#337346: slib upgrade broken
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:25:06AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:52:26AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello Rob and Thomas, This bug is assigned to libglade9 which has been removed from unstable. As a consequence, this bug should either be closed or reassigned. Bug 337346 (in your subject line) has nothing to do with glade, and is closed as of guile-1.6/1.6.7-2. Bug 337358 (to which you sent the email) doesn't mention libglade9 at all, and is not assigned to libglade9. Sorry, I meant libguile9 libguile9 has not actually been removed from unstable; see http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=namesversion=allexact=1keywords=libguile9. The link you post only lists libguile9 in _stable_. Furthermore on merkel: % madison libguile9 libguile9 | 1:1.4-24 | oldstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc libguile9 | 1:1.4-26 |stable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc So it seems pretty clear libguile9 was removed. Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370748: reportbug_submit.py does not compile
Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py does not compile due to a syntax error l. 354. I don't know python but adding if True: before l 354 and a colon after if smtplib.SMTPResponseException.smtp_code == '535' make it compile -- Package-specific info: package post-install script does not end correctly -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.utf8) Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages reportbug recommends: pn python2.3-cjkcodecs | python2 none (no description available) -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merging 370740 370729 370739
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 merge 370740 370729 370739 Bug#370729: reportbug: upgrade to 3.21 fails with syntax error Bug#370739: reportbug: postinst fails Bug#370740: reportbug: post-installation script error Merged 370729 370739 370740. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package lirc Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lirc retitle 370745 lirc: init-script hangs forever when udev is not running Bug#370745: udev: udevsettle waits forever when udev is not running Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370684: fixed in lvm2 2.02.05-2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#370684: lvm2: creates device nodes as root:root 600,
which was filed against the lvm2 package.
It has been closed by Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Your upload reverted the change of the default GID, as well as my
changelog entry. Please could you fix this?
Thanks,
Roger
diff -urN lvm2-2.02.05.original/lib/activate/activate.c
lvm2-2.02.05/lib/activate/activate.c
--- lvm2-2.02.05.original/lib/activate/activate.c 2006-06-06
18:21:41.0 +0100
+++ lvm2-2.02.05/lib/activate/activate.c2006-06-06 18:22:04.0
+0100
@@ -827,7 +827,7 @@
}
else {
lv-uid = 0;
- lv-gid = 6;
+ lv-gid = 0;
lv-mode = 0660;
}
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linuxhttp://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
pgpMPeYJAV8mT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#302127: [debian-ntp] Bug#302127: Patch for NMU
Bdale Garbee wrote: Why did you put an --oknodo on the start part of the restart clause? Primarily for symmetry, I suppose. One could argue that if someone were to start the server while the restart was in progress, having the --oknodo there would do the right thing. It's more right than wrong, but of little importance in practice, I guess. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370729: marked as done (reportbug: upgrade to 3.21 fails with syntax error)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:03:58 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On upgrading from 3.20 to 3.21 the following error occurs: Setting up reportbug (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 When starting reportbug manually afterwards it exits with the same error message - i.e. it cannot be used (this report is written after downgrading to 3.20) gregor - -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: EDITOR=joe DEBEMAIL=[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** /home/gregoa/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 3.2 mode standard ui text realname gregor herrmann email [EMAIL PROTECTED] sign gpg - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.200605231750 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages reportbug recommends: ii python2.3-iconvcodec 1.1.2-2.2 Python universal Unicode codec, us - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEhaX0OzKYnQDzz+QRAlMVAJ4ilv7/INZGuU4zwXdFHw1UV4dTCgCfZH8e BPY0G4R0iyvjOuoixnBFV3A= =ey3N -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.21.1 Yet more duplicate reports of the exact same issue... CNL -- Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.lordsutch.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#337358: Bug#337346: slib upgrade broken
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perhaps the maintainer should file a request with the FTP masters to have it removed, at which point the bug will be automatically closed. Bugs aren't automatically closed on package removal. Curious; I get such messages all the time when packages are removed, which seem to be sent automatically by the FTP masters when they remove packages. How can this be? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: changing my email address
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 370186 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#370186: hal: HAL keeps CD drive spinning constantly Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 212522 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#212522: [NONFREE-DOC:GFDL1.1olisfcbc] gdb package contains non-free GNU FDL documentation Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 243022 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#243022: ymfpci_image.h: Sourceless microcode without permission to redistribute Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 328180 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#328180: flac: FTBFS on m68k Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 335631 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#335631: postgis: Please undergo C++ 'c2' ABI transition Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 336878 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#336878: listarchives: messages not getting archived! Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 345282 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#345282: xjig: Please stop shipping /usr/doc symlink Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 368558 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#368558: x11proto-gl: debian/copyright does not contain actual licenses Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 368562 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#368562: mesa: debian/copyright does not contain all licenses Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 368565 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#368565: mesa-utils: Copyright file appears to be almost entirely wrong Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 244162 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#244162: fkiss: Crashes KDE session (!) when invoked from menu Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 211748 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#211748: Date archive headings not correct -- off-by-one error? Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 330635 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#330635: mozart: FTBFS on m68k Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 335633 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#335633: cppopt: Please undergo the C++ 'c2' ABI transition Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 345420 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#345420: libvpopmail-freecdb: Freecdb is dead, please switch to tinycdb Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 366171 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#366171: kscd: Won't release CD drive Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 370656 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#370656: xbill: Please switch back to libxaw7 Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 370664 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#370664: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics: Synaptics driver can't find my Synaptics touchpad Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # crafted is gone close 235258 Bug#235258: crafted: Please recompile with libpng12-0 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 321803 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#321803: copyright file should note FDL options used (invariant sections, back and fron cover texts) Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) submitter 342261 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#342261: pinball: recursive dependency disease Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 343322 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#343322: debbugs: Version tracking: reopened bug doesn't display properly Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] # queue is gone close 321184 Bug#321184: queue: Needs to be rebuilt with gcc 4.0 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 346055 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#346055: emacsen-common: Please upgrade to newer standards-version Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 346056 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#346056: sauce: Oldest Standards-Version of any package in Debian Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
Processed: Fixed in NMU of openswan 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 365196 + fixed Bug#365196: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370739: marked as done (reportbug: postinst fails)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:03:58 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Hello, the post-installation script of reportbug 3.21 fails: Setting up reportbug (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# COLUMNS=72 dpkg -l python2.3 | grep ^ii ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-oriented la regards Mario -- reich sein heisst nicht, einen Ferrari zu kaufen, sondern einen zu verbrennen Dietmar Wischmeier signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.21.1 Yet more duplicate reports of the exact same issue... CNL -- Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.lordsutch.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#370730: marked as done (/usr/X11R6/bin must go away)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 10:06:29 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#370730: /usr/X11R6/bin must go away has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: tkworld Version: 1.4.0-3 Severity: critical Installation of x11-common will fail, because /usr/X11R6/bin/ is not empty; tkworld has its binary there. That directory must go away, when X.org 7 comes to Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/Xorg69To7 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (101, 'unstable'), (99, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686 Locale: LANG=fi_FI.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages tkworld depends on: ii tk8.3 [wish] 8.3.5-6Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.3 - ii tk8.4 [wish] 8.4.12-1 Tk toolkit for Tcl and X11, v8.4 - Versions of packages tkworld recommends: ii mozilla-browser 2:1.7.12-1.1 The Mozilla Internet application s -- no debconf information -- Juhapekka naula Tolvanen * * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv -- Anulle kukaan ei sanonu suoraan ettei ole olemassa vanhaa pirihuoraa. Steen1 ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 07:00:10PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: Installation of x11-common will fail, because /usr/X11R6/bin/ is not empty; tkworld has its binary there. That directory must go away, when X.org 7 comes to Debian: Sorry, but tkworld no longer exists in etch, it was dropped after the sarge release; so there's no way to make a fixed tkworld package available. Closing this bug. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ ---End Message---
Processed: reopening 370636
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 reopen 370636 Bug#370636: gal0.x: FTBFS: cannot run test program while cross compiling (?) Bug reopened, originator not changed. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370729: marked as done (reportbug: upgrade to 3.21 fails with syntax error)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:03:58 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On upgrading from 3.20 to 3.21 the following error occurs: Setting up reportbug (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 When starting reportbug manually afterwards it exits with the same error message - i.e. it cannot be used (this report is written after downgrading to 3.20) gregor - -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: EDITOR=joe DEBEMAIL=[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** /home/gregoa/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 3.2 mode standard ui text realname gregor herrmann email [EMAIL PROTECTED] sign gpg - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.200605231750 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages reportbug recommends: ii python2.3-iconvcodec 1.1.2-2.2 Python universal Unicode codec, us - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEhaX0OzKYnQDzz+QRAlMVAJ4ilv7/INZGuU4zwXdFHw1UV4dTCgCfZH8e BPY0G4R0iyvjOuoixnBFV3A= =ey3N -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.21.1 Yet more duplicate reports of the exact same issue... CNL -- Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.lordsutch.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#370729: marked as done (reportbug: upgrade to 3.21 fails with syntax error)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:03:58 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On upgrading from 3.20 to 3.21 the following error occurs: Setting up reportbug (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 When starting reportbug manually afterwards it exits with the same error message - i.e. it cannot be used (this report is written after downgrading to 3.20) gregor - -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: EDITOR=joe DEBEMAIL=[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** /home/gregoa/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 3.2 mode standard ui text realname gregor herrmann email [EMAIL PROTECTED] sign gpg - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.200605231750 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages reportbug recommends: ii python2.3-iconvcodec 1.1.2-2.2 Python universal Unicode codec, us - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEhaX0OzKYnQDzz+QRAlMVAJ4ilv7/INZGuU4zwXdFHw1UV4dTCgCfZH8e BPY0G4R0iyvjOuoixnBFV3A= =ey3N -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.21.1 Yet more duplicate reports of the exact same issue... CNL -- Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.lordsutch.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#370740: marked as done (reportbug: post-installation script error)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:03:58 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable Hi, during post-installation there are some issues with file /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, mainly due to bad indentation. I am attaching a corrected version of the file (for reportbug 3.21). HTH, Roberto -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: EDITOR=vim DEBEMAIL=[EMAIL PROTECTED] EMAIL=[EMAIL PROTECTED] DEBFULLNAME=Roberto Pariset ** /home/roberto/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 3.18 mode advanced ui text email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.18 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages reportbug recommends: ii python2.3-cjkcodecs 1.1.1-1.2 Python Unicode Codecs Collection f -- no debconf information reportbug_submit.py.tbz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.21.1 Yet more duplicate reports of the exact same issue... CNL -- Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.lordsutch.com/ ---End Message---
Processed: tagging 370414
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 370414 pending Bug#370414: popt: FTBFS on amd64: mv: cannot stat There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370740: marked as done (reportbug: post-installation script error)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 13:03:58 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Close has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: reportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Tags: patch Justification: renders package unusable Hi, during post-installation there are some issues with file /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, mainly due to bad indentation. I am attaching a corrected version of the file (for reportbug 3.21). HTH, Roberto -- Package-specific info: ** Environment settings: EDITOR=vim DEBEMAIL=[EMAIL PROTECTED] EMAIL=[EMAIL PROTECTED] DEBFULLNAME=Roberto Pariset ** /home/roberto/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 3.18 mode advanced ui text email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.18 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages reportbug recommends: ii python2.3-cjkcodecs 1.1.1-1.2 Python Unicode Codecs Collection f -- no debconf information reportbug_submit.py.tbz2 Description: BZip2 compressed data ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Version: 3.21.1 Yet more duplicate reports of the exact same issue... CNL -- Chris Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.lordsutch.com/ ---End Message---
Bug#337358: Bug#337346: slib upgrade broken
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:25:06AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sorry, I meant libguile9 libguile9 has not actually been removed from unstable; yes, it has. see http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=namesversion=allexact=1keywords=libguile9. Er, note that it only lists it as being present on kfreebsd-i386, which is not an architecture in the main archive. Perhaps the maintainer should file a request with the FTP masters to have it removed, at which point the bug will be automatically closed. Bugs aren't automatically closed on package removal. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370758: ounit: FTBFS: bashisms in debian/rules
Package: ounit
Version: 1.0.2-3
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
Automatic build of ounit_1.0.2-3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46
Build started at 20060606-1906
**
dh_testroot -a
dh_installchangelogs -a changelog
dh_installdocs -a
mv debian/libounit-ocaml-dev/usr/share/doc/libounit-ocaml-dev/*.{css,html} \
debian/libounit-ocaml-dev/usr/share/doc/libounit-ocaml-dev/html/api
mv: cannot stat
`debian/libounit-ocaml-dev/usr/share/doc/libounit-ocaml-dev/*.{css,html}': No
such file or directory
make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1
**
Build finished at 20060606-1910
FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
The {,} syntax is not POSIX compliant, and the package fails to build
when using a POSIX shell like dash as /bin/sh.
Please, replace it with a POSIX compliant syntax.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid
`- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 07:07:17PM +0100, Rene Mayrhofer wrote: Attached is the diff for my openswan 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU. (Note that all the changes, except for the one to debian/changelog, are done in the upstream tarball.) Thanks, I will apply it as soon as possible (but am currently _very_ busy with another project, so please feel free to NMU the other RC bug if you feel like it). You mean #363375? I could have a look at it, but I doubt I could be of too much use. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370636: marked as done (gal0.x: FTBFS: cannot run test program while cross compiling (?))
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:32:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#370636: fixed in gal0.x 0.24-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: gal0.x Version: 0.24-6 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Automatic build of gal0.x_0.24-6 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46 Build started at 20060606-0759 ** [...] checking whether NLS is requested... yes checking libintl.h usability... yes checking libintl.h presence... yes checking for libintl.h... yes checking for gettext in libc... yes checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt checking for dcgettext... yes checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext checking for catalogs to be installed... az ca cs da de el en_GB es eu fi fr gl hu it ja ko lt ms nn no pl pt pt_BR ro ru sk sv ta tr uk zh_CN zh_TW sed: can't read ./intl/po2tbl.sed.in: No such file or directory checking for libxml (aka gnome-xml) libraries 1.8.8 = version 2.0.0... found checking for iconv in -liconv... no checking for iconv... yes checking for gnu_get_libc_version... yes checking if iconv() handles UTF-8... yes checking preferred charset formats for system iconv... found checking for %l and %k support in strftime... configure: error: cannot run test program while cross compiling See `config.log' for more details. make: *** [stampdir/configure] Error 1 ** Build finished at 20060606-0801 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] -- Finished at 20060606-0802 Build needed 00:00:57, 13052k disk space -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: gal0.x Source-Version: 0.24-7 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of gal0.x, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: gal0.x_0.24-7.dsc to pool/main/g/gal0.x/gal0.x_0.24-7.dsc gal0.x_0.24-7.tar.gz to pool/main/g/gal0.x/gal0.x_0.24-7.tar.gz libgal-data_0.24-7_all.deb to pool/main/g/gal0.x/libgal-data_0.24-7_all.deb libgal-dev_0.24-7_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gal0.x/libgal-dev_0.24-7_powerpc.deb libgal23_0.24-7_powerpc.deb to pool/main/g/gal0.x/libgal23_0.24-7_powerpc.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gal0.x package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 10:04:05 -0700 Source: gal0.x Binary: libgal-data libgal-dev libgal23 Architecture: source powerpc all Version: 0.24-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Thomas Bushnell, BSG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libgal-data - G App Libs (data files) libgal-dev - G App Libs (development files) libgal23 - G App Libs (run time library) Closes: 370636 Changes: gal0.x (0.24-7) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/patches/lkstrftime.patch: New file. Fix syntax error in AC_TRY_RUN for the %l %k support in strftime test. (Closes: #370636) Files: d9f9557807e512718a9f89fa2841a94e 834 devel optional gal0.x_0.24-7.dsc a768023c816600468c678f883d2e5aab 1324173 devel optional gal0.x_0.24-7.tar.gz 717e26c1d25cc42487367892cd4f2aa9 66902 devel optional libgal-data_0.24-7_all.deb 782e6dba7e8f3163d93065cff0a57c5f 779802 devel optional libgal-dev_0.24-7_powerpc.deb 326da94bb7bb3a103f9e775585d165e4 538738 oldlibs optional libgal23_0.24-7_powerpc.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEhciWqMsB9b6fcOoRAt8sAJ41OV20mUEUK+iCyqkY38031o2wdACfZTQt tIosuNqxct9nyU5rQ+tPDOs= =edbE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: Fixed in NMU of zope-extfile 1.4.4-1.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 368187 + fixed Bug#368187: zope-extfile: Uninstallable due unsatisfiable dependencies There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370764: xorg: The paths are all fucked up
Package: xorg Version: 1:7.0.20 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Thank you very much for moving everything from under /usr/X11R6 to the mess known as the /usr hierarchy. Now nothing works. After spending a lot of time to even manage to get X install after upgrade _removed_ all of X and x11-common refused to install at all (needed a kludge that looped creating symlinks from /usr/lib and /usr/include to /usr/X11R6 for it to not die in install scripts -- where's the option to just fucking unpack it and mark installed?), X now crashed (didn't reboot it afterwards, because I know this was coming). And now I can't boot it, because I can't install the nvidia driver. And all the other configs are fucked up too, because things are all over the place. You don't just go removing such an _established_ directory as /usr/X11R6 that all programs expect, and putting everything in a single basket. That's, indeed, the completely wrong direction to take. Application directories (/usr/pkg/package-version/ or maybe even /debian-testing/packag-version/) are the way to go, not taking this unix all in one basket mess even further. Now I hear everyone complaining you shouldn't be running testing if you're not willing to go through all the trouble. Yeah, maybe I'll have to switch GoboLinux, for at least they're attempting at cleaning up things with app.dirs instead of the FHS idiocy (/media sucks too BTW; removable media should reside directly under root for comfortable names -- and symlinks aren't of much help there generally), although They Have Been Corrupted By The Marketdroid Conventiong Of Very Long and Cumbersome Names. Or maybe I should switch to Windows, for Linux keeps getting worse all the time, and on Windows at least there Firefox has a semi-usable file dialog, and I can could use a free browser. Wait... Opera also is not an option anymore as I have no functioning X. Thank you very much. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xorg depends on: ii aterm [x-terminal-emulator] 1.0.0-2Afterstep XVT - a VT102 emulator f ii eterm [x-terminal-emulator] 0.9.3-1Enlightened Terminal Emulator ii libgl1-mesa-dri 6.4.1-0.4 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1-mesa- 6.4.1-0.4 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libglu1-mesa 6.4.1-0.4 The OpenGL utility library (GLU) ii mlterm [x-terminal-emulator] 2.9.2-5+b1 MultiLingual TERMinal ii rxvt [x-terminal-emulator]1:2.6.4-10 VT102 terminal emulator for the X ii rxvt-unicode [x-terminal-emul 7.7-4 RXVT-like terminal emulator with U ii xbase-clients 1:7.0.1-2 miscellaneous X clients ii xfonts-100dpi 1:1.0.0-2 100 dpi fonts for X ii xfonts-75dpi 1:1.0.0-2 100 dpi fonts for X ii xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-3 standard fonts for X ii xfonts-scalable 1:1.0.0-4 scalable fonts for X ii xkb-data 0.8-5 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii xserver-xorg 1:7.0.20 the X.Org X server ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 210-3 X terminal emulator ii xutils1:7.0.0-3 X Window System utility programs xorg recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370684: marked as done (lvm2: creates device nodes as root:root 600)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 10:51:05 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line lvm2: creates device nodes as root:root 600
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
---BeginMessage---
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.05-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Device ownership and permissions are incorrect
This bug is a copy of #316883, which was reassigned to the tech-ctte
and fixed in a devmapper NMU.
The defaults are also incorrect in the lvm2 package. I will NMU shortly
to correct the problem by making this change:
diff -urN lvm2-2.02.05.original/lib/activate/activate.c
lvm2-2.02.05/lib/activate/activate.c
--- lvm2-2.02.05.original/lib/activate/activate.c 2006-06-06
10:52:24.0 +0100
+++ lvm2-2.02.05/lib/activate/activate.c2006-06-06 10:53:20.322649695
+0100
@@ -827,8 +827,8 @@
}
else {
lv-uid = 0;
- lv-gid = 0;
- lv-mode = 0600;
+ lv-gid = 6;
+ lv-mode = 0660;
}
memlock_inc();
This makes sure that the device ownership and permissions have the same
defaults as devmapper and the rest of the Debian system (root:disk,
0660).
Regards,
Roger
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.17
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages lvm2 depends on:
ii cdebconf [debconf-2.0] 0.102 Debian Configuration Management Sy
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.1 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.6-13 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libdevmapper1.02 2:1.02.05-2.1 The Linux Kernel Device Mapper use
ii libncurses55.5-2 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libreadline5 5.1-7 GNU readline and history libraries
ii libselinux11.30-1SELinux shared libraries
ii libsepol1 1.12-1Security Enhanced Linux policy lib
ii lvm-common 1.5.20The Logical Volume Manager for Lin
lvm2 recommends no packages.
-- debconf information excluded
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Version: 2.02.05-3
This bug is really fixed in -3, but of course the bug seems to have been
reopened about the same time as the upload was made... re-closing. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
---End Message---
Bug#370757: xbvl: uninstallable to due dependency on libxaw8
Package: xbvl Version: 2.2-5.1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable xbvl depends on libxaw8 which is gone from unstable and going away from testing. This means xorg-x11 can't go away from Etch without removing this package. I'm not sure if a binNMU can fix this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337358: Bug#337346: slib upgrade broken
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now, that we are back on track, do you know whether this bug should be reassigned or closed ? The similar bug in guile-1.6 has been fixed. It's up to the maintainer, but I think it can be closed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337358: marked as done (libguil0: slib.scm doesn't support slib 3a2)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:55:26 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#337346: slib upgrade broken has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: slib Version: 3a2-1 Severity: important Setting up slib (3a2-1) ... ERROR: Unbound variable: with-load-pathname dpkg: error processing slib (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2 Errors were encountered while processing: slib -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-pegasos Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:45:56AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now, that we are back on track, do you know whether this bug should be reassigned or closed ? The similar bug in guile-1.6 has been fixed. It's up to the maintainer, but I think it can be closed. So be it. Given the package was removed andd thus does not have a maintainer anymore, I will take upon me to close it. Cheers, -- Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine a large red swirl here. ---End Message---
Bug#337358: Bug#337346: slib upgrade broken
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said: Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The link you post only lists libguile9 in _stable_. No, it doesn't. I can only wonder if you actually follewd it. Yes, it does. The fact that kfreebsd-i386, an unofficial arch, is still listed does not mean it's in unstable. No need to get hostile - just reread the page, please. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#370760: pretzel: FTBFS: invalid conversion from 'Attribute**' to 'const Attribute**'
Package: pretzel Version: 2.0n-2-0.1 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Automatic build of pretzel_2.0n-2-0.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46 Build started at 20060606-1938 ** dh_testdir # Add here commands to compile the package. /usr/bin/make CFLAGS=-O2 -g -Wall -W -I`pwd`/include -L`pwd` -lpretzel make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2' gcc -c alloca.c alloca.c:52:8: warning: extra tokens at end of #endif directive ar vrus libpretzel.a alloca.o ar: creating libpretzel.a a - alloca.o (cd output; make release) make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2/output' notangle -L -Rheader output.nw output.h notangle -L -Rheader asciioutput.nw asciioutput.h notangle -L -Rimplementation output.nw output.c notangle -L -Rimplementation outtest.nw outtest.c notangle -L -Rimplementation asciioutput.nw asciioutput.c g++ -O2 -g -Wall -W -I/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2/include -L/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2 -lpretzel -c output.c In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.4/../../../../include/c++/4.0.4/backward/iostream.h:31, from output.nw:650, from output.nw:109: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.4/../../../../include/c++/4.0.4/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2: warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the X header for the X.h header for C++ includes, or iostream instead of the deprecated header iostream.h. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated. g++: -lpretzel: linker input file unused because linking not done g++ -O2 -g -Wall -W -I/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2/include -L/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2 -lpretzel -c asciioutput.c In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.4/../../../../include/c++/4.0.4/backward/iostream.h:31, from output.nw:650, from asciioutput.nw:61, from asciioutput.nw:75: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.4/../../../../include/c++/4.0.4/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2: warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the X header for the X.h header for C++ includes, or iostream instead of the deprecated header iostream.h. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated. g++: -lpretzel: linker input file unused because linking not done cp output.h asciioutput.h ../include ar vrus ../libpretzel.a output.o asciioutput.o a - output.o a - asciioutput.o make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2/output' (cd attr; make release) make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2/attr' notangle -L -Rheader attr.nw attr.h notangle -L -Rimplementation attr.nw attr.c notangle -L -Rimplementation attrtest.nw attrtest.c g++ -O2 -g -Wall -W -I/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2/include -L/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2 -lpretzel -c attr.c In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.4/../../../../include/c++/4.0.4/backward/iostream.h:31, from output.nw:650, from attr.nw:261, from attr.nw:63: /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.4/../../../../include/c++/4.0.4/backward/backward_warning.h:32:2: warning: #warning This file includes at least one deprecated or antiquated header. Please consider using one of the 32 headers found in section 17.4.1.2 of the C++ standard. Examples include substituting the X header for the X.h header for C++ includes, or iostream instead of the deprecated header iostream.h. To disable this warning use -Wno-deprecated. g++: -lpretzel: linker input file unused because linking not done cp attr.h ../include ar vrus ../libpretzel.a attr.o a - attr.o make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2/attr' (cd ftokens; make regression release) make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2/ftokens' notangle -Rflex-implementation ftscan.nw ftscan.l notangle -Rbison-implementation ftparse.nw ftparse.y notangle -L -Rimplementation ftokens.nw ftokens.c notangle -L -Rheader ftparse.nw ftparse.h notangle -L -Rheader ftscan.nw ftscan.h bison -d ftparse.y mv ftparse.tab.h ftokdefs.h notangle -Rheader file for abstract base class of [[Pscan]] ftparse.nw Pscan.h notangle -Rheader file for prettyprinting scanner ftparse.nw Ppscan.h bison -pPretzel_ft ftparse.y mv ftparse.tab.c ftparse.c flex -t -L -PPretzel_ft ftscan.l ftscan.c g++ -c ftokens.c -O2 -g -Wall -W -I/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2/include -L/build/buildd/pretzel-2.0n-2 -lpretzel In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.0.4/../../../../include/c++/4.0.4
Processed: closing 370748, merging 370740 370748
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 close 370748 3.21.1 Bug#370748: reportbug_submit.py does not compile 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 3.21.1, send any further explanations to Julien Cervelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] merge 370740 370748 Bug#370740: reportbug: post-installation script error Bug#370748: reportbug_submit.py does not compile Bug#370729: reportbug: upgrade to 3.21 fails with syntax error Bug#370739: reportbug: postinst fails Merged 370729 370739 370740 370748. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370414: marked as done (popt: FTBFS on amd64: mv: cannot stat)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:47:13 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#370414: fixed in popt 1.10-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: popt Severity: normal Hi, popt 1.10-1 FTBFS on amd64 with the following error: # Move the udeb library to /lib mkdir /build/buildd/popt-1.10/debian/tmp-udeb/lib/ mv /build/buildd/popt-1.10/debian/tmp-udeb/usr/lib/libpopt.so.* \ /build/buildd/popt-1.10/debian/tmp-udeb/lib/ mv: cannot stat `/build/buildd/popt-1.10/debian/tmp-udeb/usr/lib/libpopt.so.*': No such file or directory make: *** [install] Error 1 Thanks, Roberto PS. Which is the proper severity for this kind of bug? -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.18 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: popt Source-Version: 1.10-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of popt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: libpopt-dev_1.10-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/popt/libpopt-dev_1.10-2_i386.deb libpopt0-udeb_1.10-2_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/popt/libpopt0-udeb_1.10-2_i386.udeb libpopt0_1.10-2_i386.deb to pool/main/p/popt/libpopt0_1.10-2_i386.deb popt_1.10-2.diff.gz to pool/main/p/popt/popt_1.10-2.diff.gz popt_1.10-2.dsc to pool/main/p/popt/popt_1.10-2.dsc A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated popt package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 18:28:41 +0100 Source: popt Binary: libpopt0-udeb libpopt-dev libpopt0 Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.10-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Paul Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Paul Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: libpopt-dev - lib for parsing cmdline parameters - development files libpopt0 - lib for parsing cmdline parameters libpopt0-udeb - lib for parsing cmdline parameters (udeb) Closes: 370414 Changes: popt (1.10-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Fix building on 64-bit architectures where the autoconf tools want to put things in /usr/lib64 instead of /usr/lib. Thanks to Roberto Pariset for the advice and Simon Huggins for the patch. (Closes: #370414) Files: e6752c1c41c9807fd6068744f5fb517e 585 devel optional popt_1.10-2.dsc 471cebc339d51bdc934c8fcfdb2137b5 27539 devel optional popt_1.10-2.diff.gz bbc8c3442982adc5979fcd93e03d026f 33386 base important libpopt0_1.10-2_i386.deb 0f7119873609f3246678310329a07880 38342 libdevel optional libpopt-dev_1.10-2_i386.deb 19747c07da5f40635d55108e533dfaa2 14034 debian-installer optional libpopt0-udeb_1.10-2_i386.udeb Package-Type: udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEhbyn+gi+rt7UWRIRAhbdAJ43ey7AVJZ/olRTquH8BGb7PIml2wCgkYtE qxuaO7z1DDDjSbHlL+Qr7bY= =fjxq -END PGP SIGNATURE- ---End Message---
Processed: control
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfound 370684 2.02.05-3 Bug#370684: lvm2: creates device nodes as root:root 600 Bug marked as not found in version 2.02.05-3. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370748: reportbug_submit.py gives installation problems
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.21
Followup-For: Bug #370748
a) Mixing tabs and spaces gives compiler errors
Local solution : I used vim with 'set ts=4', 'set sts=4', 'set expandtab'
and then ':%retab' to remove all tabs and convert them to 4 spaces.
b) Syntax error on line 371
Setting up reportbug (3.21) ...
Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ...
File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 371
if smtplib.SMTPResponseException.smtp_code == '535'
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Local correction : added colon after if statement
# If wrong password, try again...
if smtplib.SMTPResponseException.smtp_code == '535':
ewrite('SMTP error: authentication failed. Try again.')
continue
-- Package-specific info:
** /root/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version 3.21
mode standard
ui text
realname Jurgen Defurne
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no-check-uid
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16.11-gamma
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-o
Versions of packages reportbug recommends:
pn python2.3-cjkcodecs | python2 none (no description available)
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of zope-textindexng2 1:2.2.0-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 368184 + fixed Bug#368184: zope-textingdexng2: Uninstallable due unsatisfiable dependencies. There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merging 370600 370635 370593 370740
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 merge 370600 370635 370593 370740 Bug#370593: Problem upgrading to reportbug 3.21 Bug#370600: reportbug 3.21 fails to configure (while failed != True: SyntaxError: invalid syntax) Bug#370635: reportbug crashes on startup Bug#370740: reportbug: post-installation script error Bug#370682: reportbug doesn't upgrade correctly nor is capable of being executed (due to bad python tabbing) Bug#370729: reportbug: upgrade to 3.21 fails with syntax error Bug#370739: reportbug: postinst fails Bug#370748: reportbug_submit.py does not compile Merged 370593 370600 370635 370682 370729 370739 370740 370748. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370746: libgmp-ocaml: uninstallable, depends on unavailable ocaml-nox-3.09.1
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 06:35:31PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: Package: libgmp-ocaml Version: 20021123-10 Severity: serious The following packages have unmet dependencies: libgmp-ocaml: Depends: ocaml-nox-3.09.1 but it is not installable E: Broken packages I guess ocaml-nox-3.09.1 should be replaced by ocaml-nox-3.09.2. Maybe a better dependency could be found, however. BinNMUs were scheduled for this package, but due to its use of dh_movefiles with hard-coded ocaml 3.09.1 paths, these have failed. A sourceful upload is needed -- hopefully one that gets away from needing to hard-code the ocaml version number in its paths. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370785: dokuwiki: Privilege Escalation Problem in DokuWiki
Package: dokuwiki Version: 0.0.20060309-3 Severity: critical Another security flaw that I was informed about through freshmeat. Cheers, -Hilko Start of forwarded message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [fmII] Privilege Escalation Problem in DokuWiki Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:27:20 -0700 (PDT) This is an email sent to you by the owners of the freshmeat.net project record for DokuWiki. All URLs and other useful information can be found at http://freshmeat.net/projects/dokuwiki/ | Subscriber message |_ Sent by: Andreas Gohr http://freshmeat.net/~agohr/ Hello again! Just two days after the last security problem another flaw was discovered. Luckily not as bad as the last one. Andreas Åkre Solberg discovered a security flaw which allows registered users to view page content they usually have no access to. The problem is in the way how a successful user profile change is handled. This affects only installs which have Access Control Lists enabled (off by default) and restricted the READ permission for certain pages even for logged in users. Non-authenticated users can not exploit this bug. The package available at http://www.splitbrain.org/go/dokuwiki was updated again to reflect the change but fixing it manually is simple, too. Info on how to do this is available at http://bugs.splitbrain.org/?do=detailsid=825 Andi PS: I apologize for the trouble. Unfortunately the bigger and complex a software gets the more likely security flaws are. I try hard to avoid common mistakes but sometimes a bug slips through. If you are an experienced PHP developer I encourage you to have a look at the code (preferably the devel code) your self to help spotting such weaknesses - the more people check, the better it gets. __| End of message |___ End of forwarded message -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370233: Pending NMU in delayed/5
package rat tags 370233 + patch tags 338844 + patch thanks Hi, There is a pending NMU in delayed/5 which correct this bug. Patch is attached to this mail. -- Florent diff -ur rat-4.2.22.old/debian/changelog rat-4.2.22/debian/changelog --- rat-4.2.22.old/debian/changelog 2006-06-06 20:16:00.0 +0200 +++ rat-4.2.22/debian/changelog 2006-06-06 20:09:17.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ +rat (4.2.22-2.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Changed build-deps to remove the dependecy against xlibs (closes: +#370233). + * All files under debian/ directory are now encoded in UTF-8 (closes: +#338844). + * Updated Standards-Version to 3.7.2. + * Set debhelper compat to 4. + * Removed the last 2 lines of the changelog to correct the lintian +warning. + * Added dh_fixperms before dh_strip to fix lintian error +unstripped-binary-or-object. + + -- Florent Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 6 Jun 2006 17:24:34 +0200 + rat (4.2.22-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches: Added 01-rat-manpage-fix, for fixing the error @@ -5,7 +21,7 @@ #184338). * Reordered debian/copyright and README.Debian. - -- David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:53:39 +0100 + -- David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:53:39 +0100 rat (4.2.22-1) unstable; urgency=low @@ -19,14 +35,14 @@ new policy. Also replaced DH_COMPAT by debian/compat as joeyh's advice. * Updated config.guess and config.sub to the latest ones. - -- David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:35:02 +0100 + -- David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 10 Mar 2003 00:35:02 +0100 rat (4.2.21-2) unstable; urgency=low * Recompiled rat with the new IPv6-activated libuclmmbase1. Let's see if this resolves #147124. - -- David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 17 May 2002 18:04:10 +0200 + -- David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 17 May 2002 18:04:10 +0200 rat (4.2.21-1) unstable; urgency=low @@ -37,7 +53,7 @@ * Removed patch #05-alpha-unsigned-long: Merged upstream. * Removed several other patches previously merged upstream. - -- David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 3 May 2002 10:36:38 +0200 + -- David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri, 3 May 2002 10:36:38 +0200 rat (4.2.20-3) unstable; urgency=low @@ -47,7 +63,7 @@ Only m68k remains with build problems, but I think that it will compile this version. - -- David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:33:20 +0100 + -- David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:33:20 +0100 rat (4.2.20-2) unstable; urgency=low @@ -60,7 +76,7 @@ sparc (only powerpc remains with problems for rat entering testing). BTW, this closes: #129628. - -- David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 20 Jan 2002 04:44:59 +0100 + -- David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 20 Jan 2002 04:44:59 +0100 rat (4.2.20-1) unstable; urgency=low @@ -71,7 +87,7 @@ * Cleaned up configure changes about CFLAGS=-g, and passed it in CFLAGS from debian/rules (thanks, Santiago Vila). - -- David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 3 Dec 2001 21:15:29 +0100 + -- David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 3 Dec 2001 21:15:29 +0100 rat (4.2.19-1) unstable; urgency=low @@ -94,7 +110,7 @@ * Cleaned unnecessary changes to the sources, thus making simpler the diff.gz. - -- David Martínez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 6 Nov 2001 14:52:47 +0100 + -- David MartÃnez Moreno [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 6 Nov 2001 14:52:47 +0100 rat (4.2.18-1) unstable; urgency=low @@ -110,16 +126,16 @@ * rat is yet in non-free. I'm not sure if this package should move from non-free to main, due to several license issues (more to come). - * Upload sponsored by Jesús Gonzalez-Barahona [EMAIL PROTECTED]. + * Upload sponsored by Jesús Gonzalez-Barahona [EMAIL PROTECTED]. - -- David Martínez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 4 Jun 2001 21:19:45 +0200 + -- David MartÃnez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 4 Jun 2001 21:19:45 +0200 rat (4.2.15-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. * This version is not going to be public. - -- David Martínez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 18 Apr 2001 03:37:24 +0200 + -- David MartÃnez [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 18 Apr 2001 03:37:24 +0200 rat (4.0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low @@ -152,5 +168,3 @@ * Initial Release. -- Chu-yeon Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu, 1 Jan 1998 21:02:41 +0900 - - vim:ai:et:sts=2:sw=2:tw=78: diff -ur rat-4.2.22.old/debian/compat rat-4.2.22/debian/compat --- rat-4.2.22.old/debian/compat 2006-06-06 20:16:00.0 +0200 +++ rat-4.2.22/debian/compat 2006-06-06 19:16:21.0 +0200 @@ -1 +1 @@ -3 +4 diff -ur rat-4.2.22.old/debian/control rat-4.2.22/debian/control --- rat-4.2.22.old/debian/control 2006-06-06 20:16:00.0 +0200 +++ rat-4.2.22/debian/control 2006-06-06 19:15:43.0 +0200 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ Source:
Processed: Fixed in NMU of zope-zms 1:2.3.2b57a09-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 368183 + fixed Bug#368183: zope-zms: Uninstallable due unsatisfiable dependencies There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370784: vdkbuilder2: FTBFS: cairo.h: No such file or directory
Package: vdkbuilder2 Version: 2.4.0-4 Severity: serious Hello, There was a problem while autobuilding your package: Automatic build of vdkbuilder2_2.4.0-4 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.46 Build started at 20060606-2052 make[3]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/vdkbuilder2-2.4.0/plugins' if /bin/bash ../libtool --mode=compile i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I/usr/include/vdkxdb2 -I/usr/include/vdkxdb2/vdkxdb2 -I/usr/include/vdk2 -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include-s -O2 -I../include -Wall -MT vdkdclock.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/vdkdclock.Tpo \ -c -o vdkdclock.lo `test -f 'vdkdclock.cc' || echo './'`vdkdclock.cc; \ then mv -f .deps/vdkdclock.Tpo .deps/vdkdclock.Plo; \ else rm -f .deps/vdkdclock.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi mkdir .libs i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I/usr/include/vdkxdb2 -I/usr/include/vdkxdb2/vdkxdb2 -I/usr/include/vdk2 -DXTHREADS -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -s -O2 -I../include -Wall -MT vdkdclock.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/vdkdclock.Tpo -c vdkdclock.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/vdkdclock.o In file included from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdkcairo.h:23, from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdk.h:30, from /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gtk/gtk.h:31, from /usr/include/vdk2/vdk/vdkobj.h:30, from /usr/include/vdk2/vdk/evhandle.h:28, from /usr/include/vdk2/vdk/vdk.h:30, from ../include/vdkb2/vdkdclock.h:109, from vdkdclock.cc:1: /usr/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdkcolor.h:30:19: error: cairo.h: No such file or directory /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:62: error: variable or field 'pango_cairo_update_context' declared void /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:62: error: 'cairo_t' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:62: error: 'cr' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:63: error: expected primary-expression before '*' token /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:63: error: 'context' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:63: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:66: error: expected ',' or '...' before '*' token /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:66: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of 'cairo_font_options_t' with no type /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:67: error: expected initializer before '*' token /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:75: error: 'cairo_t' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:75: error: 'cr' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:76: error: variable or field 'pango_cairo_update_layout' declared void /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:76: error: 'cairo_t' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:76: error: 'cr' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:77: error: expected primary-expression before '*' token /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:77: error: 'layout' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:77: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:82: error: variable or field 'pango_cairo_show_glyph_string' declared void /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:82: error: 'cairo_t' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:82: error: 'cr' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:83: error: expected primary-expression before '*' token /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:83: error: 'font' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:84: error: expected primary-expression before '*' token /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:84: error: 'glyphs' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:84: error: initializer expression list treated as compound expression /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:85: error: variable or field 'pango_cairo_show_layout_line' declared void /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:85: error: 'cairo_t' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:85: error: 'cr' was not declared in this scope /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango/pangocairo.h:86: error: expected primary-expression before '*' token /usr/include/pango-1.0/pango
Bug#363375: Bug#370752: diff for 1:2.4.5+dfsg-0.1 NMU
Am Tuesday 06 June 2006 19:15 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson: You mean #363375? I could have a look at it, but I doubt I could be of too much use. Yes, the compilation problem - it would be also helpful if you can reproduce it. Thanks for the NMU, Rene pgpsgpkv6X2k5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#370779: rebportbug: unable to install reportbug 3.21
Package: rebportbug Version: 3.21 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Selecting previously deselected package reportbug. (Reading database ... 52957 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking reportbug (from .../reportbug_3.21_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package python2.3-cjkcodecs. Unpacking python2.3-cjkcodecs (from .../python2.3-cjkcodecs_1.1.1-1.2_i386.deb) ... Setting up reportbug (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Setting up python2.3-cjkcodecs (1.1.1-1.2) ... Errors were encountered while processing: reportbug localepurge: Disk space freed in /usr/share/man: 16K E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up reportbug (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: reportbug Press return to continue. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (991, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (600, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE (charmap=ISO-8859-1) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Pending NMU in delayed/5
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: package rat Ignoring bugs not assigned to: rat tags 370233 + patch Bug#370233: rat - FTBFS: Build dependecy against removed package xlibs There were no tags set. Tags added: patch tags 338844 + patch Bug#338844: rat: unsuitable encoding in control file There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of zope-zwiki 0.37.0-4.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 313271 + fixed Bug#313271: zope-zwiki: typo in summary There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 368182 + fixed Bug#368182: zope-zwiki: Uninstallable due unsatisfiable dependencies There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370782: cacti no poller output
Package: cacti Version: 0.8.6h-3 Severity: grave I am doing the old fashion way, because reportbug is broken (see other bug report =]) I've installed cacti to my server, using apt-get install cacti all depencies were installed with it. The website of cacti is working, though when running the poller.php, i get an error: noc:/etc# sudo -u noc /usr/share/cacti/site/poller.php Fatal error: Call to undefined function: mysql_pconnect() in /usr/share/php/adodb/drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 373 All is setup correctly so i really don't know what the problem is. Hopefully someone can help me I am using Debian Unstable, (updated every day) on a p4 2.8GHz with 2.6.15 kernel. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Sincerely, Paul van der Holst -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370574: marked as done (scribus-ng - FTBFS: error: #include expects FILENAME or FILENAME)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:32:17 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#370574: fixed in scribus-ng 1.3.3.2.dfsg-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: scribus-ng Version: 1.3.3.1.dfsg-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of scribus-ng_1.3.3.1.dfsg-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I. -DDOCDIR=\/usr/share/doc/scribus-ng/\ -DICONDIR=\/usr/share/scribus-ng/icons/\ -DSAMPLESDIR=\/usr/share/scribus-ng/samples/\ -DSCRIPTSDIR=\/usr/share/scribus-ng/scripts/\ -DTEMPLATEDIR=\/usr/share/scribus-ng/templates/\ -DLIBDIR=\/usr/lib/scribus-ng/\ -DPLUGINDIR=\/usr/lib/scribus-ng/plugins/\ -DSHAREDIR=\/usr/share/scribus-ng/\ -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -Wundef -ansi -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wcast-align -Wconversion -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -O2 -O2 -g -Wall -Wformat-security -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fno-common -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -MT scfonts.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/scfonts.Tpo -c -o scfonts.o scfonts.cpp; \ then mv -f .deps/scfonts.Tpo .deps/scfonts.Po; else rm -f .deps/scfonts.Tpo; exit 1; fi scfonts.cpp:53:10: error: #include expects FILENAME or FILENAME scfonts.cpp: In member function 'virtual void Foi::RawData(QByteArray)': scfonts.cpp:120: error: 'FT_Stream_Seek' was not declared in this scope scfonts.cpp:122: error: 'FT_Stream_Read' was not declared in this scope scfonts.cpp: In function 'void getFontFormat(FT_FaceRec_*, Foi::FontFormat, Foi::FontType)': scfonts.cpp:579: error: 'FT_Stream_Seek' was not declared in this scope scfonts.cpp:579: error: 'FT_Stream_Read' was not declared in this scope make[4]: *** [scfonts.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scribus-ng-1.3.3.1.dfsg/scribus' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scribus-ng-1.3.3.1.dfsg/scribus' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scribus-ng-1.3.3.1.dfsg' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/scribus-ng-1.3.3.1.dfsg' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20060605-1324 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Source: scribus-ng Source-Version: 1.3.3.2.dfsg-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of scribus-ng, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: scribus-ng_1.3.3.2.dfsg-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/scribus-ng/scribus-ng_1.3.3.2.dfsg-1.diff.gz scribus-ng_1.3.3.2.dfsg-1.dsc to pool/main/s/scribus-ng/scribus-ng_1.3.3.2.dfsg-1.dsc scribus-ng_1.3.3.2.dfsg-1_i386.deb to pool/main/s/scribus-ng/scribus-ng_1.3.3.2.dfsg-1_i386.deb scribus-ng_1.3.3.2.dfsg.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/s/scribus-ng/scribus-ng_1.3.3.2.dfsg.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Oleksandr Moskalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated scribus-ng package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:48:32 -0600 Source: scribus-ng Binary: scribus-ng Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.3.3.2.dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Oleksandr Moskalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Changed-By: Oleksandr Moskalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] Description: scribus-ng - Open Source Desktop Page Layout - developmental branch Closes: 370574 Changes: scribus-ng (1.3.3.2.dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release on May 27th, 2006. This release is compatible with libfreetype6-2.2 and should fix the FTBFS on s390 (Closes: #370574). * debian/control: Updated Standards-Version to 3.7.2. Files: a185288a51a67f57cf12043e4ec5a2b6 865 graphics optional scribus-ng_1.3.3.2.dfsg-1.dsc
Bug#370766: tomcat4 MUST depend on tomcat4-webapps
Package: tomcat4 Severity: critical Hi, today I installed tomcat4 and it failled to start because /usr/share/tomcat4/webapps/tomcat-docs was missing. It crashed during the initialization Cheers, -- Pierre Machard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of zope-docfindertab 0.5.0-2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 332171 + fixed Bug#332171: zope-docfindertab depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed tag 368188 + fixed Bug#368188: zope-docfindertab: Uninstallable due unsatisfiable dependencies There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#370779: rebportbug: unable to install reportbug 3.21
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 370779 reportbug Bug#370779: rebportbug: unable to install reportbug 3.21 Bug#370593: Problem upgrading to reportbug 3.21 Bug#370600: reportbug 3.21 fails to configure (while failed != True: SyntaxError: invalid syntax) Bug#370635: reportbug crashes on startup Bug#370682: reportbug doesn't upgrade correctly nor is capable of being executed (due to bad python tabbing) Bug#370729: reportbug: upgrade to 3.21 fails with syntax error Bug#370739: reportbug: postinst fails Bug#370740: reportbug: post-installation script error Bug#370748: reportbug_submit.py does not compile Bug reassigned from package `reportbug' to `reportbug'. -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370764: marked as done (xorg: The paths are all fucked up)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 22:04:11 +0300 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#370764: xorg: The paths are all fucked up has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: xorg Version: 1:7.0.20 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Thank you very much for moving everything from under /usr/X11R6 to the mess known as the /usr hierarchy. Now nothing works. After spending a lot of time to even manage to get X install after upgrade _removed_ all of X and x11-common refused to install at all (needed a kludge that looped creating symlinks from /usr/lib and /usr/include to /usr/X11R6 for it to not die in install scripts -- where's the option to just fucking unpack it and mark installed?), X now crashed (didn't reboot it afterwards, because I know this was coming). And now I can't boot it, because I can't install the nvidia driver. And all the other configs are fucked up too, because things are all over the place. You don't just go removing such an _established_ directory as /usr/X11R6 that all programs expect, and putting everything in a single basket. That's, indeed, the completely wrong direction to take. Application directories (/usr/pkg/package-version/ or maybe even /debian-testing/packag-version/) are the way to go, not taking this unix all in one basket mess even further. Now I hear everyone complaining you shouldn't be running testing if you're not willing to go through all the trouble. Yeah, maybe I'll have to switch GoboLinux, for at least they're attempting at cleaning up things with app.dirs instead of the FHS idiocy (/media sucks too BTW; removable media should reside directly under root for comfortable names -- and symlinks aren't of much help there generally), although They Have Been Corrupted By The Marketdroid Conventiong Of Very Long and Cumbersome Names. Or maybe I should switch to Windows, for Linux keeps getting worse all the time, and on Windows at least there Firefox has a semi-usable file dialog, and I can could use a free browser. Wait... Opera also is not an option anymore as I have no functioning X. Thank you very much. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.14 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xorg depends on: ii aterm [x-terminal-emulator] 1.0.0-2Afterstep XVT - a VT102 emulator f ii eterm [x-terminal-emulator] 0.9.3-1Enlightened Terminal Emulator ii libgl1-mesa-dri 6.4.1-0.4 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libgl1-mesa-glx [libgl1-mesa- 6.4.1-0.4 A free implementation of the OpenG ii libglu1-mesa 6.4.1-0.4 The OpenGL utility library (GLU) ii mlterm [x-terminal-emulator] 2.9.2-5+b1 MultiLingual TERMinal ii rxvt [x-terminal-emulator]1:2.6.4-10 VT102 terminal emulator for the X ii rxvt-unicode [x-terminal-emul 7.7-4 RXVT-like terminal emulator with U ii xbase-clients 1:7.0.1-2 miscellaneous X clients ii xfonts-100dpi 1:1.0.0-2 100 dpi fonts for X ii xfonts-75dpi 1:1.0.0-2 100 dpi fonts for X ii xfonts-base 1:1.0.0-3 standard fonts for X ii xfonts-scalable 1:1.0.0-4 scalable fonts for X ii xkb-data 0.8-5 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii xserver-xorg 1:7.0.20 the X.Org X server ii xterm [x-terminal-emulator] 210-3 X terminal emulator ii xutils1:7.0.0-3 X Window System utility programs xorg recommends no packages. -- no debconf information ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:00:48PM +0300, Tuomo Valkonen wrote: Thank you very much for moving everything from under /usr/X11R6 to the mess known as the /usr hierarchy. Now nothing works. After spending a lot of time to even manage to get X install after upgrade _removed_ all of X and x11-common refused to install at all (needed a kludge that looped creating symlinks from /usr/lib and /usr/include to /usr/X11R6 for it to not die in install scripts -- where's the option to just fucking unpack it and mark installed?), X now crashed (didn't reboot it afterwards, because I know this was coming). And now I can't boot it, because I can't install the nvidia driver. And all the other configs are fucked up too, because things are all over the place. You
Bug#351693: guile on ia64
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:47:44PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: The correct response, I believe, is for Debian guile-1.6 to declare in the architecture spec that ia64 is not supported. This is also a release engineering issue, because it means that packages which use guile (say, like gnucash) would need to be able to slide into testing despite not being functional on ia64. It seems like it would be incorrect to declare in gnucash that ia64 is not supported, because there is no gnucash-specific problem. Still, I don't understand all the release engineering issues. Steve, can you offer some suggestions? Assume, for the moment, that it will not be possible to make guile work on ia64. What then? If guile-1.6 declares, with the consent of the ia64 porters, that ia64 is not supported (either by explicitly excluding it from the architecture list or by adding a test suite that fails at build-time), then it would be appropriate to ask the ftp team to drop the ia64 binaries of gnucash from unstable. The procedure for doing this is to file a bug report against ftp.debian.org. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 370766 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 severity 370766 serious Bug#370766: tomcat4 MUST depend on tomcat4-webapps Severity set to `serious' from `critical' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#337358: Bug#337346: slib upgrade broken
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:09:15AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perhaps the maintainer should file a request with the FTP masters to have it removed, at which point the bug will be automatically closed. Bugs aren't automatically closed on package removal. Curious; I get such messages all the time when packages are removed, which seem to be sent automatically by the FTP masters when they remove packages. How can this be? Normally, you will see such closures only for the removal requests themselves, the bugs filed on ftp.debian.org. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370757: xbvl: uninstallable to due dependency on libxaw8
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:37:40PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: I'm not sure if a binNMU can fix this. Build-Depends: debhelper ( 3.0.0), autoconf, libglu1-xorg-dev, libxaw8-dev | libxaw-dev, autotools-dev, libtiff4-dev Nope. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370793: reportbug: Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py fails
Package: reportbug Version: 3.20 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable On todays dist-upgrade, updating reportbug failed with this error message: Errors were encountered while processing: reportbug E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) A package failed to install. Trying to recover: Setting up reportbug (3.21) ... Compiling /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py ... File /usr/share/reportbug/reportbug_submit.py, line 354 while failed != True: ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax dpkg: error processing reportbug (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: -- Package-specific info: ** /home/tobi/.reportbugrc: reportbug_version 3.20 mode advanced ui text -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages reportbug depends on: ii python2.3 2.3.5-9.1 An interactive high-level object-o Versions of packages reportbug recommends: ii python2.3-iconvcodec 1.1.2-2.2 Python universal Unicode codec, us -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370782: cacti no poller output
This one time, at band camp, Paul van der Holst said: I am doing the old fashion way, because reportbug is broken (see other bug report =]) I've installed cacti to my server, using apt-get install cacti all depencies were installed with it. The website of cacti is working, though when running the poller.php, i get an error: noc:/etc# sudo -u noc /usr/share/cacti/site/poller.php Fatal error: Call to undefined function: mysql_pconnect() in /usr/share/php/adodb/drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 373 All is setup correctly so i really don't know what the problem is. Hopefully someone can help me I am using Debian Unstable, (updated every day) on a p4 2.8GHz with 2.6.15 kernel. Probably you need an extension line for mysql in /etc/php4/cli/php.ini - it presumably only got automatically enabled for the apache module. -- - | ,''`.Stephen Gran | | : :' :[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `'Debian user, admin, and developer | |`- http://www.debian.org | - signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#370680: FTBFS with GCC 4.1: extra qualification
Le mardi 06 juin 2006 à 14:07 +0200, Fabien Chéreau a écrit : This is fixed in the development CVS. Next bug-fix version 0.8.1 will be released in the coming days. Fabien Hello Martin and Fabien, I will update the package as soon as 0.8.1 is out. Regards,
Bug#370782: cacti no poller output
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:43:12PM +0200, Paul van der Holst wrote: Package: cacti Version: 0.8.6h-3 Severity: grave I am doing the old fashion way, because reportbug is broken (see other bug report =]) I've installed cacti to my server, using apt-get install cacti all depencies were installed with it. The website of cacti is working, though when running the poller.php, i get an error: noc:/etc# sudo -u noc /usr/share/cacti/site/poller.php Fatal error: Call to undefined function: mysql_pconnect() in /usr/share/php/adodb/drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 373 All is setup correctly so i really don't know what the problem is. Hopefully someone can help me That sounds like a misconfiguration of php. Probably this could be solve by adding extension=mysql.so to your /etc/php[45]/cli/php.ini file Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: tagging 370785
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 370785 + security Bug#370785: dokuwiki: Privilege Escalation Problem in DokuWiki There were no tags set. Tags added: security End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 370779 to reportbug, closing 370779, merging 370779 370600
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19 reassign 370779 reportbug Bug#370779: rebportbug: unable to install reportbug 3.21 Warning: Unknown package 'rebportbug' Bug reassigned from package `rebportbug' to `reportbug'. close 370779 3.21.1 Bug#370779: rebportbug: unable to install reportbug 3.21 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version 3.21.1, send any further explanations to Anders Lageras [EMAIL PROTECTED] merge 370779 370600 Bug#370600: reportbug 3.21 fails to configure (while failed != True: SyntaxError: invalid syntax) Bug#370779: rebportbug: unable to install reportbug 3.21 Bug#370593: Problem upgrading to reportbug 3.21 Bug#370635: reportbug crashes on startup Bug#370682: reportbug doesn't upgrade correctly nor is capable of being executed (due to bad python tabbing) Bug#370729: reportbug: upgrade to 3.21 fails with syntax error Bug#370739: reportbug: postinst fails Bug#370740: reportbug: post-installation script error Bug#370748: reportbug_submit.py does not compile Merged 370593 370600 370635 370682 370729 370739 370740 370748 370779. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370805: libodbc++_0.2.3+0.2.4pre3-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS (64bit architectures) error: cannot convert 'SQLINTEGER*' to 'long int*' for argument '2' to 'SQLRETURN SQLRowCount(void*, long int*)'
Package: libodbc++ Version: 0.2.3+0.2.4pre3-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DODBCXX_UNICODE -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include-I/usr/local/include -DIN_ODBCXX -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wall -O2 -c -o databasemetadata.lo `test -f 'databasemetadata.cpp' || echo './'`databasemetadata.cpp g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DODBCXX_UNICODE -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include -I/usr/local/include -DIN_ODBCXX -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wall -O2 -c databasemetadata.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/databasemetadata.o databasemetadata.cpp: In member function 'bool odbc::DatabaseMetaData::_ownXXXAreVisible(int, int)': databasemetadata.cpp:1451: warning: control reaches end of non-void function /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DODBCXX_UNICODE -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include-I/usr/local/include -DIN_ODBCXX -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wall -O2 -c -o statement.lo `test -f 'statement.cpp' || echo './'`statement.cpp g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DODBCXX_UNICODE -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include -I/usr/local/include -DIN_ODBCXX -D_GNU_SOURCE -g -Wall -O2 -c statement.cpp -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/statement.o statement.cpp: In member function 'int odbc::Statement::getUpdateCount()': statement.cpp:676: error: cannot convert 'SQLINTEGER*' to 'long int*' for argument '2' to 'SQLRETURN SQLRowCount(void*, long int*)' make[3]: *** [statement.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libodbc++-0.2.3+0.2.4pre3/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libodbc++-0.2.3+0.2.4pre3' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/libodbc++-0.2.3+0.2.4pre3' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 it failed on all alpha, amd64 and ia64 with the same error. A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=libodbc++ver=0.2.3+0.2.4pre3-1 Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370809: scheme48_1.3-6(amd64/unstable): FTBFS on 64bit architectures: segmentation fault
Package: scheme48 Version: 1.3-6 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: ./build/build-usual-image . `(cd . echo $PWD)`/scheme 'scheme48.image' './scheme48vm' \ './build/initial.image' ./build/build-usual-image: line 42: 18850 Segmentation fault $vm -i $initial -a batch EOF ,load $srcdir/scheme/env/init-defpackage.scm ((*structure-ref filenames 'set-translation!) =scheme48/ $srcdir/scheme/) ,load =scheme48/packages.scm A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=scheme48ver=1.3-6 Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370802: google-perftools_0.7-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: src/malloc_hook.cc:118: error: invalid conversion from 'long int' to 'void*'
Package: google-perftools Version: 0.7-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: src/tcmalloc.cc:1834: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions src/tcmalloc.cc: In function 'void DumpStats(TCMalloc_Printer*, int)': src/tcmalloc.cc:1858: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions src/tcmalloc.cc: In function 'void* do_memalign(size_t, size_t)': src/tcmalloc.cc:2199: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions src/tcmalloc.cc:2202: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions src/tcmalloc.cc:2240: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I./src -I./src -pthread -DNDEBUG -g -Wall -O2 -c src/tcmalloc.cc -o libtcmalloc_minimal_la-tcmalloc.o /dev/null 21 /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I./src -I./src -pthread -DNDEBUG -g -Wall -O2 -c -o libtcmalloc_minimal_la-malloc_hook.lo `test -f 'src/malloc_hook.cc' || echo './'`src/malloc_hook.cc g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I./src -I./src -pthread -DNDEBUG -g -Wall -O2 -c src/malloc_hook.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libtcmalloc_minimal_la-malloc_hook.o src/malloc_hook.cc: In function 'void* mmap64(void*, size_t, int, int, int, __off64_t)': src/malloc_hook.cc:118: error: invalid conversion from 'long int' to 'void*' make[1]: *** [libtcmalloc_minimal_la-malloc_hook.lo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/google-perftools-0.7' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=google-perftoolsver=0.7-1 Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370803: grub2_1.94-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: configure: error: neither start nor _start is defined
Package: grub2 Version: 1.94-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: checking for ncurses.h... yes checking curses.h usability... yes checking curses.h presence... yes checking for curses.h... yes checking for objcopy... objcopy checking for strip... strip checking for nm... nm checking whether optimization for size works... yes checking whether -falign-loops works... yes checking whether objcopy works for absolute addresses... yes checking if C symbols get an underscore after compilation... no checking if start is defined by the compiler... no checking if _start is defined by the compiler... no configure: error: neither start nor _start is defined make: *** [config.status] Error 1 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=grub2ver=1.94-1 Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370782: marked as done (cacti no poller output)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:38:43 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#370782: cacti no poller output has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: cacti Version: 0.8.6h-3 Severity: grave I am doing the old fashion way, because reportbug is broken (see other bug report =]) I've installed cacti to my server, using apt-get install cacti all depencies were installed with it. The website of cacti is working, though when running the poller.php, i get an error: noc:/etc# sudo -u noc /usr/share/cacti/site/poller.php Fatal error: Call to undefined function: mysql_pconnect() in /usr/share/php/adodb/drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 373 All is setup correctly so i really don't know what the problem is. Hopefully someone can help me I am using Debian Unstable, (updated every day) on a p4 2.8GHz with 2.6.15 kernel. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Sincerely, Paul van der Holst ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- hi paul, On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:43:12PM +0200, Paul van der Holst wrote: I am doing the old fashion way, because reportbug is broken (see other bug report =]) well while you're doing things the old fashioned way, how about you look up documentation the old fashioned way, and take a look at /usr/share/doc/cacti/README.Debian, which i'm fairly certain has the answer to your problem in it :) sean signature.asc Description: Digital signature ---End Message---
Bug#370808: samhain_2.2.0-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS (amd64): ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'
Package: samhain Version: 2.2.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' ./src/sh_tiger1_64.c:375: error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' make[1]: *** [sh_tiger_i.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/samhain-2.2.0' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=samhainver=2.2.0-1 Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Still changing email address
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: submitter 328200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#328200: ntp: Source package contains unlicensed files Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] submitter 368563 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#368563: xorg-server: debian/copyright missing SGI Free Software License B Changed Bug submitter from Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370816: libsimplelist0-dev: dangling symlink /usr/lib/libsimplelist.so due to missing dependency on libsimplelist0
Package: libsimplelist0-dev Version: 0.3.3-1 Severity: serious Hello, libsimplelist0-dev does not depend on libsimplelist0, but contains a dangling symlink /usr/lib/libsimplelist.so - libsimplelist.so.0.1.0 this causes other packages build-depending on it to FTBFS, for example ggtl: /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -W -Wall -Werror -o libggtl.la -rpath /usr/lib -no-undefined -version-info 2:0:0 ggtl.lo ggtlai.lo -lsimplelist cc -shared .libs/ggtl.o .libs/ggtlai.o /usr/lib/libsimplelist.so -Wl,-soname -Wl,libggtl.so.2 -o .libs/libggtl.so.2.0.0 cc: /usr/lib/libsimplelist.so: No such file or directory make[1]: *** [libggtl.la] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ggtl-2.1.3' make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=ggtlver=2.1.3-1 please fix the dependency accordingly. Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 268828 is critical, merging 268828 328225
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 severity 268828 critical Bug#268828: grubconf: Destroys/Overwrites menu.lst without notice Severity set to `critical' from `grave' merge 268828 328225 Bug#268828: grubconf: Destroys/Overwrites menu.lst without notice Bug#328225: grubconf destroys menu.lst Merged 268828 328225. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 340395, tagging 370421
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 340395 pending Bug#340395: amule-utils: links to libfreetype6, which is going away There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 370421 pending Bug#370421: amule-common: description says it includes ed2k handler but it doesn't There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370311: runs paperconf in preconfig when it's not available yet
tag 370311 patch
thanks
Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You run paperconf before it's available, which apprently means that no
/etc/papersize file gets created, so paperconf later fails.
[...]
Preconfiguring packages ...
/tmp/libpaper1.config.312981: line 19: paperconf: command not found
Although this is a bug, it isn't fatal. The problem is that, due to a
circular dependency between libpaper1 and libpaper-utils, the latter
gets configured before the former's postinst has had a chance to create
/etc/papersize:
[...]
Setting up libpaper-utils (1.1.18) ...
Setting up r-base-core (2.3.1-1) ...
paperconf: cannot get paper size from /etc/papersize: No such file or
directory
[...]
Setting up libpaper1 (1.1.18) ...
Creating config file /etc/papersize with new version
The best way to ensure a predictable order of configuration is to
downgrade libpaper1's dependency on libpaper-utils to a Recommends.
If we do that, neither libpaper1's config script nor its postinst can
rely on the paperconf utility. But, as shown above, the config script
can't rely on paperconf as it is; during preconfiguration, it must be
entirely self-reliant. Since paper sizes are pretty static, I think the
cleanest approach is to embed them in the config script itself. That's
what the attached patch does automatically from debian/rules, along with
a couple of other changes:
* Use `set -e' to make it less likely errors go undetected. (Note
that the above error happened on the left hand side of `|', which
can't really be detected in the Bourne shell -- I simply avoided
pipes.)
* Don't override preseeded values. The debconf database may already
contain answers preseeded by the installer; the patch checks for
this with
db_get libpaper/defaultpaper [ -n $RET ]
Unfortunately, there is no way to tell whether db_get returned a
user-specified/preseeded value (which we should leave alone) or the
value of the Default field (which we might want to override based on
the locale). The seen flag is not a reliable indicator as it may be
preseeded to false if the intention is to prompt the user with an
other-than-usual default. I dealt with this by removing the Default
field from the template, and setting a default in the config script
whether or not a locale is present.
(Sorry, this is hopelessly convoluted. Don't hesitate to ask for
clarification.)
Cheers,
Matej
--- libpaper-1.1.18.orig/debian/control
+++ libpaper-1.1.18/debian/control
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Package: libpaper1
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, debconf (= 1.3.22) | debconf-2.0, ucf (= 0.28),
libpaper-utils
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, debconf (= 1.3.22) | debconf-2.0, ucf (= 0.28)
Replaces: libpaperg ( 1.1.9)
Provides: libpaperg
Recommends: libpaper-utils
--- libpaper-1.1.18.orig/debian/libpaper1.config
+++ libpaper-1.1.18/debian/libpaper1.config
@@ -1,28 +1,92 @@
#!/bin/sh
+set -e
-. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
+defaultpaper () {
+ # This is always in millimeters. If no locale is specified or
+ # available, it will default to a4.
+ w=$(locale width 2/dev/null) || return 0
+ h=$(locale height 2/dev/null) || return 0
+
+ # Try to find a matching paper size. The data must be embedded here
+ # (done automatically by debian/rules) because the rest of the package
+ # may not have been unpacked at this stage.
+ LC_ALL=C awk 'NF == 5 int($2 + 0.5) == '$w' int($4 + 0.5) == '$h'
{
+ print $1;
+ exit;
+}' __END_PAPERSPECS__
+__BEGIN_PAPERSPECS__
+a4 210 mm 297 mm
+letter 215.9 mm 279.4 mm
+note 215.9 mm 279.4 mm
+legal 215.9 mm 355.6 mm
+executive 184.15 mm 266.7 mm
+halfletter 139.7 mm 215.9 mm
+halfexecutive 133.35 mm 184.15 mm
+11x17 279.4 mm 431.8 mm
+statement 139.7 mm 215.9 mm
+folio 215.9 mm 330.2 mm
+quarto 215.194 mm 275.167 mm
+10x14 254 mm 355.6 mm
+ledger 431.8 mm 279.4 mm
+tabloid 279.4 mm 431.8 mm
+a0 841 mm 1189 mm
+a1 594 mm 841 mm
+a2 420 mm 594 mm
+a3 297 mm 420 mm
+a5 148 mm 210 mm
+a6 105 mm 148 mm
+a7 74 mm 105 mm
+a8 52 mm 74 mm
+a9 37 mm 52 mm
+a10 26 mm 37 mm
+b0 1000 mm 1414 mm
+b1 707 mm 1000 mm
+b2 500 mm 707 mm
+b3 353 mm 500 mm
+b4 250 mm 353 mm
+b5 176 mm 250 mm
+b6 125 mm 176 mm
+b7 88 mm 125 mm
+b8 62 mm 88 mm
+b9 44 mm 62 mm
+b10 31 mm 44 mm
+c2 458 mm 648 mm
+c3 324 mm 458 mm
+c4 229 mm 354 mm
+c5 162 mm 229 mm
+c6 114 mm 162 mm
+c7 81 mm 114 mm
+c8 57 mm 81 mm
+DL 110.067 mm 220.133 mm
+Comm10 104.775 mm 241.3 mm
+Monarch 98.425 mm 190.5 mm
+archE 914.4 mm 1219.2 mm
+archD 609.6 mm 914.4 mm
+archC 457.2 mm 609.6 mm
+archB 304.8 mm 457.2 mm
+archA 228.6 mm 304.8 mm
+flsa 215.9 mm 330.2 mm
+flse 215.9 mm 330.2 mm
+csheet 431.8 mm 558.8 mm
+dsheet 558.8 mm 863.6 mm
+esheet 863.6 mm 1117.6 mm
+__END_PAPERSPECS__
+}
-db_version 2.0
-db_capb backup
+. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule
-paper=
if [ -f /etc/papersize ]; then
- paper=`head -n 1 /etc/papersize`
+ #
Bug#340395: amule-utils: links to libfreetype6, which is going away
* Steve Langasek [Sun, 05 Feb 2006 04:16:08 -0800]: found 340395 2.1.0-1 thanks This bug is apparently back in the latest version of the package. Yet http://bugs.debian.org/src:amule does not show it as unresolved. Steve, do you know what can have wrong here, or shall I contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] I had noticed the extra dependency yesterday and was planning on fixing anyway, but glad I noticed that I get an Closes: in the changelog. ;-) Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: María del Monte - Yo soy del sur
Bug#370638: auctex: fails to install
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: Julian Gilbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: auctex Version: 11.82-1 Severity: serious This package doesn't install on a fresh testing system: Setting up auctex (11.82-1) ... install/auctex: Setting up for emacs21... emacs-package-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex emacs21 emacs21 failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-package-install line 30, TSORT line 1. dpkg: error processing auctex (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Hm. Can you send us the file /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp/auctex/CompilationLog (or *.gz) No longer have the broken one. Seems the problem was caused by the /usr/bin/emacs symlink not existing. Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#343599: marked as done (ghemical: This package depends on libsc5 which is not exist in sarg e amd64)
Your message dated Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:02:23 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#343599: (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: ghemical Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.3 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 04:06:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:07:04PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 02:53:19PM +0100, Gregoire Masliah wrote: the version of ghemical i've attempted to install is 1.01-2 I have requested a rebuild for the amd64 archive which should make ghemical installable on stable/amd64 again. Hello Michael, what is the status of this bug ? It seems it should be tagged stable or closed, but it does not affect etch. Right, doing so now. Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html ---End Message---
Processed: Re: runs paperconf in preconfig when it's not available yet
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 370311 patch Bug#370311: runs paperconf in preconfig when it's not available yet There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#370810: supertuxkart_0.0.0.1-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS (64bit): KartDriver.cxx:618: error: cast from 'ssgEntity*' to 'int' loses precision
Package: supertuxkart Version: 0.0.0.1-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: -c -o KartDriver.o `test -f 'KartDriver.cxx' || echo './'`KartDriver.cxx; \ then mv -f .deps/KartDriver.Tpo .deps/KartDriver.Po; \ else rm -f .deps/KartDriver.Tpo; exit 1; \ fi Herring.h:46: warning: 'class ActiveThingInstance' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor Herring.h:84: warning: 'class HerringInstance' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor Controller.h:29: warning: 'class Controller' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor PlayerDriver.h:38: warning: 'class PlayerDriver' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor KartDriver.cxx: In function 'void print_model(ssgEntity*, int)': KartDriver.cxx:618: error: cast from 'ssgEntity*' to 'int' loses precision make[2]: *** [KartDriver.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/supertuxkart-0.0.0.1/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/supertuxkart-0.0.0.1' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 A full build log can be found at: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=amd64pkg=supertuxkartver=0.0.0.1-1 Best regards Frederik Schueler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: merge 369818 370100 370311
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 369818 Bug#369818: libpaper1: should depend on libpaper-utils 'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version; use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead. Bug reopened, originator not changed. severity 369818 grave Bug#369818: libpaper1: should depend on libpaper-utils Severity set to `grave' from `normal' severity 370100 grave Bug#370100: libpaper-utils has circular Depends on libpaper1 Severity set to `grave' from `important' merge 369818 370100 370311 Bug#369818: libpaper1: should depend on libpaper-utils Bug#370100: libpaper-utils has circular Depends on libpaper1 Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged: Values for `package' don't match: #369818 has `libpaper1'; #370100 has `libpaper-utils' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#328200: ntp licensing status: looking pretty good
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ntp 4.2.1rc1 was released in March (see http://lists.ntp.isc.org/pipermail/announce/2006-March/12.html). Looking through that, we see that: a lot of stuff has been fixed. :-) Good to hear. The licensing from Frank Kardel fixes nearly everything we actually *use*. Summary of current status when the new upstream is packaged: (1) The following files in the upstream source, unused, should most likely be removed from the Debian source tarball. -- arlib/* (unused, non-distributable license) -- html/build/hints/solaris-dosynctodr.html (useless on Linux, pilfered from webpage, no license) (2) The following files still have license problems (quoting Andres Salomon) libntp/adjtime.c is copyrighted by many people. This file is actually pretty problematic; the HPUX adjtime implementation is copyrighted Tai Jin (and is ok, but should be mentioned in the copyright file), but the QNX adjtime implementation is copyright Chris Burghart, and has no license (and is therefore non-distributable). (Quoting Bdale Garbee) The file include/global.h has an RSA copyright assertion with all rights reserved and no other grant. However, the files that include it clearly came from the rsaref2.0 package, which has a BSD-like license with advertising clause. I believe this header file also was part of that package and therefore covered by the same RSA license terms. Therefore, I suggest the copyright and license terms from libntp/md5c.c should be added to debian/copyright to cover all inclusions from rsaref2.0. (3) The following files which were not previously identified have license problems: include/rsa_md5.h has an obnoxious advertising clause of an extra-obnoxious variety: License to copy and use this software is granted provided that it is identified as the RSA Data Security, Inc. MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm in all material mentioning or referencing this software or this function. License is also granted to make and use derivative works provided that such works are identified as derived from the RSA Data Security, Inc. MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm in all material mentioning or referencing the derived work. This is really over the top. All material mentioning or referencing? Debian's not doing this. Surely this can be replaced with a workalike header file, though? Bare copyright notices, without licenses, other than those of David Mills, show up in the following files (all of which appear to be irrelevant to Linux and Debian): include/timepps-SCO.h include/timepps-Solaris.h include/timepps-SunOS.h kernel/tty_chu_STREAMS.c (I think this Sun/Solaris only) ports/winnt/libntp/messages.mc ports/winnt/include/hopf_PCI_io.h There are bare copyright notices without licenses in the following files which appear relevant to Debian: libparse/clk_wharton.c ntpd/refclock_neoclock4x.c scripts/ntpver.in -- trivial file scripts/monitoring/lr.pl scripts/monitoring/ntp.pl scripts/monitoring/ntploopstat scripts/monitoring/ntploopwatch scripts/monitoring/ntptrap The stuff in scripts is copyright either Rainer Pruy, Friedrich-Alexander Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg or Ulrich Windl or both, with one bit copyright Frank Kardel The files libparse/clk_wharton.c and ntpd/refclock_neoclock4x.c are copyright Philippe De Muyter [EMAIL PROTECTED], who included a warranty disclaimer, but no license. Hopefully the authors of these can be found and will be happy to license the files. That's it; every other file has been mentioned previously by either Bdale or Andres. (4) There are some substantial updates needed to debian/copyright. I'd be happy to do this once (1), (2), and (3) are dealt with. -- Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bush admitted to violating FISA and said he was proud of it. So why isn't he in prison yet?... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of messagewall 1.0.8+dfsg-0.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 365187 + fixed Bug#365187: [NONFREE-DOC] Package contains IETF RFC/I-D There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
