Bug#408948: .volume might be needed too as well as full pathnames

2007-02-14 Thread Loïc Minier
Hi,

 I see you went for a whitelist for .desktop files hanlding in nautilus
 for #408948; I think it lessens the impact of the lack of the MIME type
 mismatch checks in gnome-vfs2 and is less intrusive, and will permit
 downgrading 408948.

 However, I think .volume needs to be added, and perhaps other
 extensions as well.  At least here I see:
bee% gnomevfs-ls computer:// 
...
refuge.volume   (Regular, application/x-desktop)size 0  mode 
0444

 (this is a locally mounted partition)

 There's also smblink-root, but I suppose some larger whitelist can be
 implemented for network://:
bee% gnomevfs-ls network://
smblink-root(Regular, application/x-desktop)size 0  mode 
0444

 Did you already check smb:// shares?

Bye,
-- 
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#405676: Re #405676

2007-02-14 Thread David Härdeman
Wasn't this package kept in the archive just to not break d-i RC1?

If so, now would perhaps be a good time remove the package as d-i RC1 is
broken anyways due to the old security key issue?

-- 
David Härdeman



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401916: bug #401916

2007-02-14 Thread David Härdeman
Have any of you guys who can reproduce this been able to do the additional
tests suggested in the bug report yet? This is one of the few remaining RC
bugs which is present in both Etch and Sid so it would be nice to make
some progress...

-- 
David Härdeman



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: your mail

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 366175 critical
Bug#366175: initramfs-tools: lvm is not initialized on USB disks
Severity set to `critical' from `normal'

 forcemerge 366175 401916
Bug#366175: initramfs-tools: lvm is not initialized on USB disks
Bug#401916: initramfs-tools: [powerpc64] i-t tries to mount RAID/LVM stuff 
before the disk are up - unbootable
Forcibly Merged 366175 401916.

 tags 366175 -moreinfo
Bug#366175: initramfs-tools: lvm is not initialized on USB disks
Tags were: moreinfo
Bug#401916: initramfs-tools: [powerpc64] i-t tries to mount RAID/LVM stuff 
before the disk are up - unbootable
Tags removed: moreinfo

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#401916:

2007-02-14 Thread Michael Prokop
* David Härdeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20070206 19:15]:
  On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 11:14:34AM +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:

  Any further tips, hints,... what I could try?

  Could you try these lines in the udev script and then mail the contents of 
  /begin.ps, /middle.ps and /finish.ps? It would be interesting to see if we 
 can 
  find out why the previously suggested approach didn't work:

  udevtrigger
  udevsettle || true
  ps  /begin.ps
  while ps | grep -q usb-stor-scan; do
sleep 1;
  done
  while ps | grep -q scsi_scan_; do
sleep 1;
  done
  ps  /middle.ps
  udevsettle || true
  ps  /finish.ps

Done that. I've taken screenshots with the digicam (sorry, was the
easiest way for me and I'm a little bit in a hurry right now):

  http://dufo.tugraz.at/~prokop/initramfs/

regards,
-mika-


pgpkekNuEI8hQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#410891: FTBFS: includes kernel headers from user space

2007-02-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: quik
Version: 2.1-8
Severity: serious

This package fails to build:

 Automatic build of quik_2.1-8 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by 
 sbuild/powerpc 0.52
...
 dh_testdir
 /usr/bin/make
 make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/quik-2.1'
 make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/quik-2.1/util'
 gcc -O2 -Wall -o elfextract elfextract.c
 In file included from /usr/include/asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h:5,
  from /usr/include/asm/bitops.h:248,
  from /usr/include/linux/bitops.h:9,
  from /usr/include/linux/thread_info.h:20,
  from /usr/include/linux/preempt.h:9,
  from /usr/include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
  from /usr/include/linux/capability.h:45,
  from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:44,
  from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/elf.h:7,
  from elfextract.c:9:
 /usr/include/asm-generic/bitops/fls.h:13: error: conflicting types for 'fls'
 /usr/include/asm/bitops.h:242: error: previous definition of 'fls' was here
 In file included from /usr/include/linux/timex.h:57,
  from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:48,
  from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/elf.h:7,
  from elfextract.c:9:
 /usr/include/linux/time.h:16: error: redefinition of 'struct timespec'
 /usr/include/linux/time.h:22: error: redefinition of 'struct timeval'
 In file included from /usr/include/asm/div64.h:1,
  from /usr/include/linux/calc64.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:4,
  from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:49,
  from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/elf.h:7,
  from elfextract.c:9:
 /usr/include/asm-generic/div64.h:1:2: error: #error Do not include div64.h.
 In file included from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:49,
  from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/elf.h:7,
  from elfextract.c:9:
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:33:3: error: #error You lose.
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:254:46: error: division by zero in #if
 In file included from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:49,
  from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/elf.h:7,
  from elfextract.c:9:
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'jiffies_to_msecs':
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:259: error: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:259: error: (Each undeclared identifier is 
 reported only once
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:259: error: for each function it appears in.)
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:265:46: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'jiffies_to_usecs':
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:270: error: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:278:46: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'msecs_to_jiffies':
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:283: error: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:291:46: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'usecs_to_jiffies':
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:296: error: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'timespec_to_jiffies':
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:315: error: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:321: error: 'SHIFT_HZ' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'jiffies_to_timespec':
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:334: error: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 

Bug#366175:

2007-02-14 Thread David Härdeman
severity 366175 critical
forcemerge 366175 401916
tags 366175 -moreinfo
thanks

I'd say that this is the same bug as 401916 so I'm merging them (not sure
about the severity though but I picked the higher of the two).

Torsten, could you please read bug report #401916 and try the steps
suggested in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=401916#52

-- 
David Härdeman



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410803: twiki: postinst relies on data in /usr/share/doc

2007-02-14 Thread Frank Küster
tags 410803 patch
thanks

Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  So please move the starter kit to /usr/share/twiki and symlink it from
 the doc directory, if you really want to have it available from there,
 too - and don't forget to change the tar extract line in the postinst
 script.

Since the location is mentioned in README.Debian, I didn't think the
symlinks are needed.  Here's a patch.  As usual, it comes with an offer
to NMU the package.

Regards, Frank

diff -Nur twiki-4.0.5.old/debian/changelog twiki-4.0.5/debian/changelog
--- twiki-4.0.5.old/debian/changelog	2007-02-14 10:34:30.0 +0100
+++ twiki-4.0.5/debian/changelog	2007-02-13 21:58:38.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+twiki (1:4.0.5-9~1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Install twiki-data.tar.gz and  twiki-pub.tar.gz in /usr/share/twiki
+instead of /usr/share/doc (closes: #410803).  Also change the paths in
+README.Debian. 
+
+ -- Frank KÃŒster [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:58:38 +0100
+
 twiki (1:4.0.5-8) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * make patch for #404222 allow trailing slashes again
diff -Nur twiki-4.0.5.old/debian/dirs twiki-4.0.5/debian/dirs
--- twiki-4.0.5.old/debian/dirs	2007-02-14 10:34:30.0 +0100
+++ twiki-4.0.5/debian/dirs	2007-02-13 21:54:57.0 +0100
@@ -6,3 +6,4 @@
 usr/share/perl5
 etc/twiki
 usr/share/doc/twiki
+usr/share/twiki
diff -Nur twiki-4.0.5.old/debian/postinst twiki-4.0.5/debian/postinst
--- twiki-4.0.5.old/debian/postinst	2007-02-14 10:34:30.0 +0100
+++ twiki-4.0.5/debian/postinst	2007-02-13 21:56:51.0 +0100
@@ -40,14 +40,14 @@
 	if [ ! -e /var/lib/twiki/data/_default/WebHome.txt ]; then
 		# only extract if they say so and there's no home there
 		# and even then, fail on overwrite so we don't stomp.
-		tar -zxk -C / -f /usr/share/doc/twiki/twiki-data.tar.gz
+		tar -zxk -C / -f /usr/share/twiki/twiki-data.tar.gz
 		# clean up the .mailnotify timestamps.
 		webs=Main Sandbox TWiki Trash _default;
 		for web in $webs; do
 			date +%s  /var/lib/twiki/data/$web/.mailnotify
 		done
 			if [ ! -e /var/www/twiki/pub/wikiHome.gif ]; then
-tar -zxk -C / -f /usr/share/doc/twiki/twiki-pub.tar.gz
+tar -zxk -C / -f /usr/share/twiki/twiki-pub.tar.gz
 			fi
	fi
	fi
diff -Nur twiki-4.0.5.old/debian/README.Debian twiki-4.0.5/debian/README.Debian
--- twiki-4.0.5.old/debian/README.Debian	2007-02-14 10:34:30.0 +0100
+++ twiki-4.0.5/debian/README.Debian	2007-02-13 21:57:06.0 +0100
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 TWiki for Debian
 
 
-/usr/share/doc/twiki/twiki-data.tar.gz has the initial data set, if
+/usr/share/twiki/twiki-data.tar.gz has the initial data set, if
 you find you want to restore the data in /var/lib/twiki/data/ after
 experimenting.
-/usr/share/doc/twiki/twiki-pub.tar.gz has the initial pub data set.
+/usr/share/twiki/twiki-pub.tar.gz has the initial pub data set.
 It should also be unpacked to /var/www/twiki/pub
 
 
diff -Nur twiki-4.0.5.old/debian/rules twiki-4.0.5/debian/rules
--- twiki-4.0.5.old/debian/rules	2007-02-14 10:34:30.0 +0100
+++ twiki-4.0.5/debian/rules	2007-02-13 21:56:38.0 +0100
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
 	  xargs -n1 perl -pi -e 's/^(\s)nobody:/\1$(TWIKI_OWNER):/ unless $$done; $$done=1 if /^\n$$/;'
 	tar -cf - -C debian/twiki var/lib/twiki/data \
 		| tardy -User_NAme=$(TWIKI_OWNER) -Group_NAme=www-data \
-		| gzip -c -9  debian/twiki/usr/share/doc/twiki/twiki-data.tar.gz
+		| gzip -c -9  debian/twiki/usr/share/twiki/twiki-data.tar.gz
 	rm -rf debian/twiki/var/lib/twiki/data
 
 #do the same with pub - it should also only be replaced if there is none there already
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
 	  xargs -n1 perl -pi -e 's/^(\s)nobody:/\1$(TWIKI_OWNER):/ unless $$done; $$done=1 if /^\n$$/;'
 	tar -cf - -C debian/twiki var/www/twiki/pub \
 		| tardy -User_NAme=$(TWIKI_OWNER) -Group_NAme=www-data \
-		| gzip -c -9  debian/twiki/usr/share/doc/twiki/twiki-pub.tar.gz
+		| gzip -c -9  debian/twiki/usr/share/twiki/twiki-pub.tar.gz
 	rm -rf debian/twiki/var/www/twiki/pub
 
 	cp -pR lib/* debian/twiki/usr/share/perl5/


-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)


Processed: Re: twiki: postinst relies on data in /usr/share/doc

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 tags 410803 patch
Bug#410803: twiki: postinst relies on data in /usr/share/doc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 409820 is serious

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
 severity 409820 serious
Bug#409820: initramfs-tools: mbr_check() does not work reliable with lilo and 
grub around
Severity set to `serious' from `important'


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410803: twiki: postinst relies on data in /usr/share/doc

2007-02-14 Thread Sven Dowideit
hehe, sorry, and thanks - I've already fixed it, and a few other
recomendations that were made


BUT, I'd love some one to upload it for me 

the new version is at
http://members.iinet.net.au/~spos/twiki_4.0.5-9.dsc  

and If this version can go into Etch... even better.

I was thrilled about the amount of feedback i got yesterday - thanks
everyone of you, and if you find more, i'll be quite happy to fix them
too.

Sven


On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 10:42 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
 tags 410803 patch
 thanks
 
 Gerfried Fuchs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   So please move the starter kit to /usr/share/twiki and symlink it from
  the doc directory, if you really want to have it available from there,
  too - and don't forget to change the tar extract line in the postinst
  script.
 
 Since the location is mentioned in README.Debian, I didn't think the
 symlinks are needed.  Here's a patch.  As usual, it comes with an offer
 to NMU the package.
 
 Regards, Frank
 
 
-- 

Sven Dowideit - http://DistributedINFORMATION.com
A WikiRing Partner http://wikiring.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#408948: .volume might be needed too as well as full pathnames

2007-02-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 14 février 2007 à 11:49 +0100, Loïc Minier a écrit :
  A more elegant way to fix network:// and the like is probably to give
  autogenerated files another MIME type, like
  application/x-desktop-virtual.
 
  I'm not sure we foresee all the consequences of such a change,

We have to list all stuff using these virtual desktop files. A first
search only lead me to the filechooser in libgnomeui, but there may be
others.

The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced the best solution is
to have a way to distinguish these virtual files from real ones. Relying
later on the URI is too much error-prone and we will sooner or later
find another vulnerability. However there may be other ways to
distinguish them than changing the MIME type. I'll check whether we can
rely on some of the fields of the GnomeVFSFileInfo API, but if it is not
possible changing the MIME type looks like the best thing to do.

  and I'm
  not sure why we would need to treat as virtual the .desktop files
  below computer:// and not below sshfs://.

Because sshfs doesn't generate such desktop files. Only the computer,
dns-sd, smb and network methods do.

 This would allow to easily distinguish
  them from any user-created files, as there is no way the fd.o database
  would return this MIME type when queried.
 
  The shared mime info DB can be queried, even for the virtual files.
  I'm not sure it is, but the virtual .desktop file contents would match
  the magic.

This would be harmless. What cannot happen is the fd.o returning this
whitelisted MIME type for a regular file.

  I'm not sure why we would need a shlib bump if we only change gnome-vfs
  to return a different MIME type for smb-root.  The API doesn't change,
  and while the ABI changes at some level, we need to adapt the
  applications, not simply rebuild them; it's a kind of transition where
  we will have to raise build-deps and deps on libgnome-vfs in some
  applications (well, in nautilus), so I think we should simply add a
  versionned dependency in nautilus, for example a conflict.  IOW,
  versions of nautilus which refuse handling smb-root as a desktop file
  should conflict with versions of gnome-vfs providing smb-root.

Well, we need nautilus to depend on the new libgnomevfs2-0 package, one
way or another. The simplest way to do it now and forget it without bad
consequences is to bump the shlibs.

-- 
 .''`.
: :' :  We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'   We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-our own. Resistance is futile.




Bug#410903: xkb-data: configuration files have been moved to /usr/share

2007-02-14 Thread Frank Küster
Package: xkb-data
Version: 0.9-4
Severity: serious

After upgrading to etch, I noticed that it is no longer possible to use
locally adapted keyboard layouts.  The reason is that the contents of
/etc/X11/xkb/ have been moved to /usr/share, and files at the old
location are no longer used.

I think that it is clear that these files actually are configuration
files.  This has been discussed for example in #326637.  Reading through
this bug, one gets the impression that everyone who spoke up agreed that
it makes sense, and is actually done, to customize these files (or maybe
rather, to add customization files in these directories, see below).

However, the bug was closed with XKB files have been moved into
/usr/share/X11/xkb, so I am closing this bug.  I guess this might be
because Debian simply followed an upstream change.  Which is an
explanation, but not a good reason.

What is the consequence of this bug?

- In my case, it is that my old setup stopped producing my customized
  keyboard layout because the files that I added in /etc/ were not
  found.  I fear this will happen to quite a lot of people upgrading
  from older versions (both sarge and xorg on sarge-backports). 

- In extreme cases, it might have the consequence that people are not
  able to log in, because some keys they need for their username or
  password are not available with the resulting keyboard layout. (And
  the keyboard layout on the console might never have provided them).

- Well, and generally it's a policy violation to ship configuration
  files in /usr/share.

What are possible approaches to solve this bug?

1) move (most of) xkb-data's files back to /etc.  

   The problem here is that if sarge's dpkg is used, this will lead to
   loads of created by you or a script messages.  Which can be
   circumvented by either a Pre-Depends: dpkg (=1.1321) (something
   you want to avoid) or by removing files with matching md5sums in
   /var/lib/dpkg/info.  Unfortunately, the second approach leads to
   conffile has been deleted prompts when etch's dpkg is used (see
   #346282).

2) State that 

   - the files in /usr/share/X11/xkb/ represent particular
 configuration choices, selected by settings in xorg.conf, and are not
 meant to be configured, 

   but that 

   - it must be possible to *add* new layouts locally.

   In terms of implementation, this would mean that some tool would have
   to merge the contents of /usr/share/X11/xkb and *new* files in
   /etc/X11/xkb, and that the executable needs to be changed to load
   them from the merging place.

3) State that the files in /usr/share/X11/xkb/ represent particular
   configuration choices, selected by settings in xorg.conf, and are not
   meant to be configured, not at all, not even by addition.

   IMHO, this would only be acceptable if

   a) it is possible to do single key reassignments in xorg.conf (or at
  other places, like setxkbmap calls in /etc/X11/Xsession{,.d}), 

   and

   b) there's a really user-oriented documentation about how to do that,
  if not an upgrade path.

   With user-oriented I mean that at least anyone who, years ago, was
   able to change one of the lines in, say, /etc/X11/xkb/symbols/pc/us,
   to suit their needs, will be guided to achieve a similar effect with
   xorg.conf.  README.config.gz is not sufficient, since it doesn't talk
   at all about key remappings, only choosing between existing options.

   Ideally even someone who got the changed file from a friend would be
   able to do it.

4) State that I am talking rubish^W^W^W^W^W^W not included here.

Regards, Frank

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

-- no debconf information

-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)



Bug#410871: 2.3.7-2 still not installable

2007-02-14 Thread Magnus Therning

I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
postfix.postinst).  My attempts to install postfix from experimental
failed in the same way, as did downgrading to Etch's version.

--
Magnus Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410833: marked as done (FTBFS: error: 'CL_EMALFZIP' undeclared)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:02:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#410833: fixed in avscan 1.3.1-openssl-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: avscan
Version: 1.3.1-openssl-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

This package fails to compile in sid (but not in etch):

 Automatic build of avscan_1.3.1-openssl-1 on coconut0 by sbuild/ia64 0.49
...
 Compiling module avscanop.o
 avscanop.c: In function 'AVScanOPClamAVInit':
 avscanop.c:300: warning: implicit declaration of function 'cl_loaddbdir'
 avscanop.c:317: warning: implicit declaration of function 'cl_loaddb'
 avscanop.c: In function 'AVScanOPClamAVScanFile':
 avscanop.c:569: error: 'CL_EMALFZIP' undeclared (first use in this function)
 avscanop.c:569: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
 avscanop.c:569: error: for each function it appears in.)
 make[2]: *** [avscanop.o] Error 1
 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/avscan-1.3.1-openssl/avscan'

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: avscan
Source-Version: 1.3.1-openssl-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
avscan, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

avscan_1.3.1-openssl-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/avscan/avscan_1.3.1-openssl-2.diff.gz
avscan_1.3.1-openssl-2.dsc
  to pool/main/a/avscan/avscan_1.3.1-openssl-2.dsc
avscan_1.3.1-openssl-2_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/a/avscan/avscan_1.3.1-openssl-2_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated avscan package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:50:24 +0100
Source: avscan
Binary: avscan
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1.3.1-openssl-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 avscan - GTK frontend for the Clam AntiVirus scanner (ClamAV)
Closes: 410833
Changes: 
 avscan (1.3.1-openssl-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Fix FTBFS with clamav 0.90, thanks to Stephen Gran for the patch
 (Closes: #410833), and bump build-depends.
Files: 
 3e703255bba413beccfc09a419a7f75d 668 utils optional avscan_1.3.1-openssl-2.dsc
 bc84f9d82e80fdab806aa00154774dff 10822 utils optional 
avscan_1.3.1-openssl-2.diff.gz
 ef8cc414b3725381e0e0664b5386e343 561406 utils optional 
avscan_1.3.1-openssl-2_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF0vl9xa93SlhRC1oRAp0pAJ99avXxz3AADraciGDj75WSWDit4wCdH+yx
pnkVe0ZdzQiq8u6wbisjk4g=
=86gw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#408556: .volume might be needed too as well as full pathnames

2007-02-14 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
   A more elegant way to fix network:// and the like is probably to give
   autogenerated files another MIME type, like
   application/x-desktop-virtual.
   I'm not sure we foresee all the consequences of such a change,
 We have to list all stuff using these virtual desktop files. A first
 search only lead me to the filechooser in libgnomeui, but there may be
 others.

 Precisely.  Actually, what you describe is much like the proposed
 solution to return a x-suspected-malware MIME type on suspicious
 .desktop files, just the other way around, but the x-suspected-malware
 solution would allow for more use cases such as:
 - handling of desktop files which do not use the correct extension
 - handling of other file types

 So, instead of introducing a new MIME type that should be trusted and
 changing all relevant applications to only trust that one, I would
 rather introduce a new MIME type which should not be trusted.

 We can even add the special URL handling for smb://, network:// etc. in
 gnome-vfs itself and return the .desktop MIME type for the allowed
 pathnames.

 The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced the best solution is
 to have a way to distinguish these virtual files from real ones. Relying
 later on the URI is too much error-prone and we will sooner or later
 find another vulnerability. However there may be other ways to
 distinguish them than changing the MIME type. I'll check whether we can
 rely on some of the fields of the GnomeVFSFileInfo API, but if it is not
 possible changing the MIME type looks like the best thing to do.

 I think it's safer but harder to change the MIME type, but my initial
 analysis was that it can be very complex since Nautilus isn't just
 requesting the MIME type from gnome-vfs2: for example it has logic to
 use the file data or the file extension depending on the speed of the
 underlying backend or whether the file is local etc.

 However, it's unsafe (especially at this point of the release cycle) to
 introduce a new MIME type AND to make all applications honor it at the
 same time; it's really easier to introduce a new MIME type which should
 NOT be handled by applications, such as malware MIME type of which no
 application know anything about!

   and I'm not sure why we would need to treat as virtual the
   .desktop files below computer:// and not below sshfs://.
 
 Because sshfs doesn't generate such desktop files. Only the computer,
 dns-sd, smb and network methods do.

 My point is that sshfs generates virtual files exactly like
 computer:// or smb://: these are all _virtual_ file systems, so
 distinguishing a virtual desktop file from a real one is IMO a too
 dangerous concept.


 It seems to me what you're trying to express with the virtual desktop
 files is that these files can be trusted, but:
 1) it doesn't solve the problem completely as we still need to trust
e.g. local .desktop files, other extensions, or some URL schemes, so
it only covers files generated by smb://, computer://, or
network:// and say we can trust these, but it doesn't help in
expressing that we can trust some local .desktop files owned by the
user
 2) it only covers .desktop files
 3) it is confusing to use the concept of virtual to express secure;
at least a x-trusted-desktop-file would express this in a clearer
manner IMO

 I still think the safest is to introduce a MIME type on which NOT to
 act instead of a MIME type to act on, since all applications already
 handle the case where a MIME type is NOT supported.


 But this is all if we can change gnome-vfs2 to return these MIME types,
 and I think it's too hard.  Changing nautilus (and perhaps libgnomeui?)
 alone to special case some URIs seems more realistic and covers all
 problems we know about in terms of trust of .desktop files (the
 displaying still needs to be addressed).

 Well, we need nautilus to depend on the new libgnomevfs2-0 package, one
 way or another. The simplest way to do it now and forget it without bad
 consequences is to bump the shlibs.

 But the shlibs doesn't solve anything: it will still be possible to
 install the new libgnomevfs with packages built against the old one,
 while adding a conflicts in applications we adapt with older gnomevfs
 would prevent this.

 There are 413 rdeps on libgnomevfs2-0, and shlibs changes would be
 frowned upon at this point of the cycle, a conflict in nautilus and
 perhaps libgnomeui really seems less intrusive.

-- 
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410907: egroupware -missing in repository

2007-02-14 Thread Mgr. Peter Tuharsky

Package: egroupware
severity: grave

The egroupware packages are missing in testing/Etch repository! 2 weeks 
ago they have been available!



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410871: 2.3.7-2 still not installable

2007-02-14 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
 I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
 described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
 postfix.postinst).  My attempts to install postfix from experimental
 failed in the same way, as did downgrading to Etch's version.

What version of update-inetd do you have?

lamont


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410803: twiki: postinst relies on data in /usr/share/doc

2007-02-14 Thread Frank Küster
Sven Dowideit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 hehe, sorry, and thanks - I've already fixed it, and a few other
 recomendations that were made


 BUT, I'd love some one to upload it for me 

 the new version is at
 http://members.iinet.net.au/~spos/twiki_4.0.5-9.dsc  

 and If this version can go into Etch... even better.

I must say that I do not feel qualified to evaluate these changes, and
whether they are appropriate for etch.  In particular, I don't know
enough about apache to be able to judge the severity and appropriateness
of the security fixes.

The only remark that I can make is that you should send out requests for
translations, since you've changed templates so late in the release
cycle. 

Regards, Frank
-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)



Bug#410907: marked as done (egroupware -missing in repository)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:51:28 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#410907: egroupware -missing in repository
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---

Package: egroupware
severity: grave

The egroupware packages are missing in testing/Etch repository! 2 weeks 
ago they have been available!


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Am Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2007 14:02 schrieb Mgr. Peter Tuharsky:
 Package: egroupware
 severity: grave

 The egroupware packages are missing in testing/Etch repository! 2 weeks
 ago they have been available!

And you think by filing a grave bug they will come back?
---End Message---


Bug#401916:

2007-02-14 Thread David Härdeman
On Wed, February 14, 2007 11:02, Michael Prokop said:
 * David Härdeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20070206 19:15]:
  udevtrigger
  udevsettle || true
  ps  /begin.ps
  while ps | grep -q usb-stor-scan; do
sleep 1;
  done
  while ps | grep -q scsi_scan_; do
sleep 1;
  done
  ps  /middle.ps
  udevsettle || true
  ps  /finish.ps

 Done that. I've taken screenshots with the digicam (sorry, was the
 easiest way for me and I'm a little bit in a hurry right now):

   http://dufo.tugraz.at/~prokop/initramfs/

Images is fine, thanks. Unfortunately the ps ax output is the same each
time so it is no surprise that my approach doesn't work. I do however have
another theory, it seems that it can take a sec or two between the loading
of usb-storage and the usb-stor-scan thread to be created...in order to
test this further, could you please replace the above parts with:

udevtrigger
udevsettle || true
cat /proc/modules  /modules.txt

And provide me with the contents of modules.txt (the digicam method is fine)

Could you also provide the output of ps ax once the system is up and
running?

-- 
David Härdeman



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410871: 2.3.7-2 still not installable

2007-02-14 Thread Fabiano Manoel de Andrade

Trying another tactic, can you add this to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix /
And see if postfix-2.3.7-3~0 fixes the issue for you?



thanks,
lamont


I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way described
in bug #410871. Try to downgrade but without sucess. So I've used your
repository and now works with 2.3.7-3~0 version. Here some more information:
~# update-inetd --version
update-inetd 1.12
DebianNet module 1.11

Thanks.
Fabiano.


Bug#410871: 2.3.7-2 still not installable

2007-02-14 Thread Magnus Therning

On 2/14/07, LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
 I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
 described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
 postfix.postinst).  My attempts to install postfix from experimental
 failed in the same way, as did downgrading to Etch's version.

Trying another tactic, can you add this to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://people.debian.org/~lamont/postfix /
And see if postfix-2.3.7-3~0 fixes the issue for you?


The installation worked fine, but there now seems to be something else wrong:

# mailq

postqueue: warning: Mail system is down -- accessing queue directly
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
962704B919  585 Wed Feb 14 14:00:01  magnusth
magnusth

CF2C24B91A  585 Wed Feb 14 14:05:01  magnusth
magnusth

C498C4B91B 1557 Wed Feb 14 14:07:58  magnusth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

460B94B91C  585 Wed Feb 14 14:10:02  magnusth
magnusth

959104B918  585 Wed Feb 14 14:15:02  magnusth
magnusth

A51784B91D  585 Wed Feb 14 14:20:01  magnusth
magnusth

-- 4 Kbytes in 6 Requests.
--
Magnus Therning [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410907: closed by Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#410907: egroupware -missing in repository)

2007-02-14 Thread Mgr. Peter Tuharsky

Yes, hopefully..

Debian Bug Tracking System  wrote / napísal(a):

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#410907: egroupware -missing in repository,
which was filed against the egroupware package.

It has been closed by Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED].

Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] by replying
to this email.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)





Predmet:
Re: Bug#410907: egroupware -missing in repository
Od:
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dátum:
Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:51:28 +0100
Komu:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Komu:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Am Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2007 14:02 schrieb Mgr. Peter Tuharsky:

Package: egroupware
severity: grave

The egroupware packages are missing in testing/Etch repository! 2 weeks
ago they have been available!


And you think by filing a grave bug they will come back?






Bug#410926: FTBFS: 'cl_loaddbdir' was not declared in this scope

2007-02-14 Thread Martin Michlmayr
Package: clamcour
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

This package fails to compile in sid (but not in etch):

 Automatic build of clamcour_0.2.2-1 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by 
 sbuild/powerpc 0.52
...
 make[4]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/clamcour-0.2.2/src'
 if powerpc-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -ansi -pedantic 
 -pipe -Wall -O3 -pthread -I/usr/include -g -O2 -MT clam.o -MD -MP -MF 
 .deps/clam.Tpo -c -o clam.o clam.cpp; \
   then mv -f .deps/clam.Tpo .deps/clam.Po; else rm -f 
 .deps/clam.Tpo; exit 1; fi
 clam.cpp: In member function 'bool cClamClient::InitVirDB()':
 clam.cpp:74: error: 'cl_loaddbdir' was not declared in this scope
 make[4]: *** [clam.o] Error 1

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410501: marked as done (destar: Conf files are not saved if there's not writing access to zaptel.conf)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 15:47:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#410501: fixed in destar 0.2.0-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: destar
Version: 0.2.0-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

There was a bad conditional expresion on one dpatch file edited on last
package upload. Here's the fix to the bug:

--- zaptel.dpatch   2007-02-11 00:05:55.0 -0500
+++ zaptel.dpatch.patch 2007-02-11 01:59:41.0 -0500
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
for _fn,cnf in configlets.asterisk_configfiles:
if _fn == 'op_server.cfg' and panelutils.isConfigured() != 1:
continue
-+  if not os.access(/etc/zaptel.conf, os.O_RDWR):
++  if _fn == 'zaptel.conf' and not os.access(/etc/zaptel.conf, 
os.O_RDWR):
 +  continue
try:
cnf.write()




-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686
Locale: LANG=es_CO.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_CO.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages destar depends on:
ii  asterisk 1:1.2.14~dfsg-4 Open Source Private Branch Exchang
ii  python   2.4.4-2 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-medusa0.5.4+clean-1   Framework for implementing asynchr
ii  python-pychart   1.39-5  Python library for creating high q
ii  python-pysqlite2 2.3.2-2 python interface to SQLite 3
ii  python-quixote1  1.2-4   A highly Pythonic Web application 
ii  sqlite3  3.3.8-1 A command line interface for SQLit

Versions of packages destar recommends:
ii  op-panel 0.26.dfsg-5 switchboard type application for t

-- no debconf information

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: destar
Source-Version: 0.2.0-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
destar, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

destar_0.2.0-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/destar/destar_0.2.0-4.diff.gz
destar_0.2.0-4.dsc
  to pool/main/d/destar/destar_0.2.0-4.dsc
destar_0.2.0-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/d/destar/destar_0.2.0-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alejandro Rios P. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated destar package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:14:35 -0500
Source: destar
Binary: destar
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.0-4
Distribution: testing-proposed-updates
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian VoIP Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Alejandro Rios P. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 destar - management interface for the Asterisk PBX
Closes: 410501
Changes: 
 destar (0.2.0-4) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=medium
 .
   * Added comprobation to patches/zaptel.dpatch (Closes: #410501)
   * Create /etc/asterisk/manager.d directory if its not present.
   * Install /etc/asterisk/destar_cfg.py as an example since its not always 
suitable
 for most users/systems.
   * Commented nasty debug messages shown when running 'destar -b'.
   * Added svn info to debian/control.
Files: 
 e576563713eddd4ff4fd8037733c0672 853 comm optional destar_0.2.0-4.dsc
 2cf3d55d5f74ca03ce7ceef632ed740a 8043 comm optional destar_0.2.0-4.diff.gz
 ec6509c76d5d2f9990dd9e9b929a15de 193354 comm optional destar_0.2.0-4_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF0yueQUuEI2/szeARAj/WAJ48iuRbU410R1v0G7VFJnPPYtV2qACfZa4E
zkvPYPFO7Fd1+m9mSF5GBhE=
=CYLb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#410871: 2.3.7-2 still not installable

2007-02-14 Thread LaMont Jones
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:23:43PM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
 On 2/14/07, LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The installation worked fine, but there now seems to be something else 
 # mailq
 postqueue: warning: Mail system is down -- accessing queue directly

If postfix was not running before the upgrade, I believe that it doesn't
restart it after the upgrade.  That could be what it is...

if you start postfix (/etc/init.d/postfix start), and then dpkg
--reinstall the .deb, does it restart it?

lamont


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410830: upstart-compat-sysv: Upstart fails in the middle of boot with Invalid message received

2007-02-14 Thread Jan Hudec
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 23:28:53 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
 As I'm going to upload 0.3.5-1 soon, could you please test if you can
 reproduce this problem with 0.3.5-1
 Add deb-src http://debs.michaelbiebl.de unstable main to
 /etc/apt/sources.list,
 run apt-get update  apt-get build-dep upstart  apt-get source -b
 upstart and install the resulting debs.
 (Sorry for the inconvenience, I don't have a x64 machine to build the
 packages myself).

Compiled and tried it and it seems to be OK. Unless there is some reason why
my system would compile it differently than the autobuilder, it should fix
the problem.

-- 
 Jan 'Bulb' Hudec [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#410871: 2.3.7-2 still not installable

2007-02-14 Thread Marcel Sebek
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:36:53AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
  I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
  described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
  postfix.postinst).  My attempts to install postfix from experimental
  failed in the same way, as did downgrading to Etch's version.
 
 What version of update-inetd do you have?
 

I also faced that problem and downgrading update-inetd from 4.27-0.3 to
4.27-0.2 fixed it.

-- 
Marcel Sebek



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#407494: Fwd: [caudium-general] Broken Debian testing caudium package (fwd)

2007-02-14 Thread Alain Schroeder
Am Montag, den 12.02.2007, 23:46 +0100 schrieb Henrik Andreasson:
 On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Alain Schroeder wrote:
 
 http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=caudium (caudium is 
 scheduled for removal)
 
 I have a new aproach, shall we downgrade pike?
 
 If debian refuses to upgrade maybe we shall try to downgrade pike to a 
 stable version 
 (http://pike.ida.liu.se/pub/pike/latest-stable/Pike-v7.6.86.tar.gz)

Who said Debian refuses to upgrade Pike? It is not wanted, but still a
more likely option than a downgrade, because a downgrade breaks ALL
dependencies and requires all recent Pike based packages to rebuild.
Does anybody know a version of Pike that actually works? A diff between
the current and that version would be very interesting!

Bye,
   Alain



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410406: is wormux 0.7.4-3 affected, too?

2007-02-14 Thread Eddy Petrișor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

I was wondering if the testing version of wormux is affected by this
bug. I guess it is.
- --
Regards,
EddyP
=
Imagination is more important than knowledge A.Einstein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF0zRYY8Chqv3NRNoRAurVAKCjBh7Dp9hD0S3q/y4olgC58Og8cACeOZF6
iRcSGWcxIdoG/QS2+9lwhZg=
=5R/N
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410871: 2.3.7-2 still not installable

2007-02-14 Thread Marcel Sebek
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:36:53AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:58:07AM +, Magnus Therning wrote:
  I just tried upgrading to 2.3.7-2 and it failed in the exact way
  described in bug #410871 (verified by adding the 'set -x' in
  postfix.postinst).  My attempts to install postfix from experimental
  failed in the same way, as did downgrading to Etch's version.
 
 What version of update-inetd do you have?
 

I also faced that problem and downgrading update-inetd from 4.27-0.3 to
4.27-0.2 fixed it.

-- 
Marcel Sebek



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#409356: marked as done (cups-pdf: allows unprivileged user to read parts of any file)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#409356: fixed in cups-pdf 2.4.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: cups-pdf
Version: 2.4.2-1
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
Tags: security

Unprivileged user can execute /usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf to read
parts of any file. End of file is printed by Ghostscript in error report.

Execution of this command as unprivileged user
  /usr/lib/cups/backend/cups-pdf shadow user title 1 '' /etc/shadow
will result in Ghostscript error showing last line of /etc/shadow file
(possibly containing password hash)
  ERROR: /undefined in saned:!:13511:0:9:7:::
  ...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-albemuth
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages cups-pdf depends on:
ii  cupsys   1.2.7-3 Common UNIX Printing
System(tm) -
ii  gs-esp   8.15.3.dfsg.1-1 The Ghostscript PostScript
interpr
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-10GNU C Library: Shared libraries

cups-pdf recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
Grzegorz Zur

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: cups-pdf
Source-Version: 2.4.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cups-pdf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cups-pdf_2.4.2-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cups-pdf/cups-pdf_2.4.2-2.diff.gz
cups-pdf_2.4.2-2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cups-pdf/cups-pdf_2.4.2-2.dsc
cups-pdf_2.4.2-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cups-pdf/cups-pdf_2.4.2-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated cups-pdf package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:45:57 +0200
Source: cups-pdf
Binary: cups-pdf
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.4.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Martin-Éric Racine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 cups-pdf   - PDF printer for CUPS
Closes: 409356
Changes: 
 cups-pdf (2.4.2-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Upgraded backend permissions to match Policy 10.9 (Closes: #409356).
Files: 
 ad48d2a6d1cec6c9df2bfc9bcbe14607 630 graphics optional cups-pdf_2.4.2-2.dsc
 139775c326e991d0ea9ce78a8118c8c2 6544 graphics optional 
cups-pdf_2.4.2-2.diff.gz
 ff7ede9ba9d0da7c2515b0f6e74c268c 40298 graphics optional 
cups-pdf_2.4.2-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF00g/y2+jQOcHWlQRAnkiAJ4r5RYZLGiBvV6g8bXjC1WdsT8YSACaA+Ss
gx9irHfX5HfkOwxY6kSitnE=
=cERf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#402389: Doesn't look like a bug in usbmount

2007-02-14 Thread Armin Berres
Hi!

Your bug doesn't look like a bug, at least no bug in usbmount.
I guess it is a hardware or maybe driver problem.
Did you try to mount your camera manually? Did this work? Can you mount
other hardware, e.g. an usb stick?

Your log snippet shows output which is generated _before_ usbmount is
activated, otherwise you would find output from usbmount in the logs.
Something like this:
Feb 14 18:12:59 bluemoon usbmount[5914]: executing command: mount...

To be completely sure you can set VERBOSE=no in
/etc/usbmount/usbmount.conf

Please reply as soon as possible, because your bugreport is blocking
usbmount from entering Etch!

Regards,
Armin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#405676: Re #405676

2007-02-14 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 09:46, David Härdeman wrote:
 Wasn't this package kept in the archive just to not break d-i RC1?

 If so, now would perhaps be a good time remove the package as d-i RC1
 is broken anyways due to the old security key issue?

Not if we want to keep the option to release a Beta4 as suggested by Joey 
on d-boot. IMO such a release should use the current kernel in testing 
and thus needs the old aes modules.

Anyway, I don't see what removing it now solves except for the rather 
cosmetic benefit of having one less RC bug listed for Etch.

Why is it so important to remove it now rather than when its replacement 
is in place? This is in no way delaying the release, nor is it causing 
any problems. We all know this package is going to be removed before the 
release, so the bug is already virtually solved.

Let's concentrate on the real blockers rather than on trivial issues.


pgp2CYPACEfIf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#410554: marked as done (stlport5.1_5.1.0-1(experimental/alpha/ds10): error: size of array '__static_assert' is negative)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 20:47:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#410554: fixed in stlport5.1 5.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: stlport5.1
Version: 5.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental

Heya,

stlport5.1 failed to build on alpha:

Automatic build of stlport5.1_5.1.0-1 on ds10 by sbuild/alpha 98-farm
Build started at 20070211-1039
**
[...]
/usr/bin/make -C build/lib -f gcc.mak depend release-shared 
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/stlport5.1-5.1.0/build/lib'
c++ -pthread -fexceptions -fident  -fPIC -O2 -g -fuse-cxa-atexit  -D_REENTRANT 
-D_STLP_REAL_LOCALE_IMPLEMENTED -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE 
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I../../stlport  -c -o obj/gcc/so/dll_main.o 
../../src/dll_main.cpp
../../stlport/stl/_cwchar.h:114: error: size of array '__static_assert' is 
negative
make[1]: *** [obj/gcc/so/dll_main.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/stlport5.1-5.1.0/build/lib'
make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2

Marc
-- 
BOFH #25:
Decreasing electron flux

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: stlport5.1
Source-Version: 5.1.0-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
stlport5.1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libstlport5.1-dbg_5.1.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/stlport5.1/libstlport5.1-dbg_5.1.0-2_i386.deb
libstlport5.1-dev_5.1.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/stlport5.1/libstlport5.1-dev_5.1.0-2_i386.deb
libstlport5.1_5.1.0-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/stlport5.1/libstlport5.1_5.1.0-2_i386.deb
stlport5.1_5.1.0-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/stlport5.1/stlport5.1_5.1.0-2.diff.gz
stlport5.1_5.1.0-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/stlport5.1/stlport5.1_5.1.0-2.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thomas Girard [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated stlport5.1 package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:06:28 +
Source: stlport5.1
Binary: libstlport5.1-dev libstlport5.1-dbg libstlport5.1
Architecture: source i386
Version: 5.1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Torsten Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Thomas Girard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 libstlport5.1 - STLport C++ class library
 libstlport5.1-dbg - STLport C++ class library debug symbols
 libstlport5.1-dev - STLport C++ class library
Closes: 410554
Changes: 
 stlport5.1 (5.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/patches/alpha-upstream.diff: restored. (Closes: #410554).
Files: 
 32425c7784ce7b9eb6c6dd44ba462427 774 devel optional stlport5.1_5.1.0-2.dsc
 d9550c793268b84e0fe6acffddf971e9 9593 devel optional stlport5.1_5.1.0-2.diff.gz
 fa60486d1dc823222525bb3abe1ab042 452266 libdevel optional 
libstlport5.1-dev_5.1.0-2_i386.deb
 c3b571bdbefcf78c8c7ceabdc1c4382e 216510 libs optional 
libstlport5.1_5.1.0-2_i386.deb
 39d6877916170267fe9aa4635bdccb8c 922074 libs extra 
libstlport5.1-dbg_5.1.0-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF03OVfY3dicTPjsMRApwBAJ9Gjv+RM/pG8+SpY1I0RA/S092yQwCeK8FV
mkjtOVZPaJuVpUnO8KidoRw=
=23ra
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#402389: Doesn't look like a bug in usbmount

2007-02-14 Thread Rolandas Juodzbalis
Armin Berres wrote:
 Hi!
 
 Your bug doesn't look like a bug, at least no bug in usbmount.
 I guess it is a hardware or maybe driver problem.
 Did you try to mount your camera manually? Did this work? Can you mount
 other hardware, e.g. an usb stick?
 
 Your log snippet shows output which is generated _before_ usbmount is
 activated, otherwise you would find output from usbmount in the logs.
 Something like this:
 Feb 14 18:12:59 bluemoon usbmount[5914]: executing command: mount...
 
 To be completely sure you can set VERBOSE=no in
 /etc/usbmount/usbmount.conf
 
 Please reply as soon as possible, because your bugreport is blocking
 usbmount from entering Etch!
 
 Regards,
 Armin

Hi,

I tried with usb stick and it works fine. I tried it with memory card
taken from digital camera with card reader and it is mounted ok. But
when I'm attaching digital camera directly, it is not mounted. From logs:
from messages:
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel:   Vendor: NIKON Model: D50
  Rev: 1.00
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel:   Type:   Direct-Access
  ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: SCSI device sdb: 1935361 512-byte hdwr
sectors (991 MB)
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: sdb: Write Protect is off
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: SCSI device sdb: 1935361 512-byte hdwr
sectors (991 MB)
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: sdb: Write Protect is off
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel:  sdb: sdb1
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: sd 9:0:0:0: Attached scsi removable disk sdb

from syslog:
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: sdb: assuming drive cache: write through
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 1935360
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: printk: 1 messages suppressed.
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical
block 1935360
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 1935360
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical
block 1935360
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 1935360
Feb 14 20:00:10 acer kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdb, logical
block 1935360
...
Feb 14 20:00:20 acer kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdb, sector 134
Feb 14 20:00:31 acer usbmount[19507]: cannot read from /dev/sdb1

Rolandas
p.s. you can close this bug, because I already got card reader and use it.
p.p.s I cannot mount it manually after inserting. Only after removing
usbmount it can be done manually.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: tagging 409688

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
 tags 409688 + pending
Bug#409688: FTBFS: gpe/render.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: patch sid
Tags added: pending


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: setting package to gpe-julia, tagging 409688

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
 package gpe-julia
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gpe-julia

 tags 409688 + pending
Bug#409688: FTBFS: gpe/render.h: No such file or directory
Tags were: pending patch sid
Tags added: pending


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410944: python-numpy: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/f2py/src/fortranobject.h'

2007-02-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: python-numpy
Version: 1:1.0.1-2
Severity: serious

Hi,

It seems python-numpy and python-numpy-dev are both shipping
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/f2py/src/fortranobject.h.  It
probably should only be in the -dev package.

I get:
Selecting previously deselected package python-numpy.
Unpacking python-numpy (from .../python-numpy_1%3a1.0.1-2_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package python-numpy-dev.
Unpacking python-numpy-dev (from .../python-numpy-dev_1%3a1.0.1-2_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing 
/home/buildd/build/chroot-unstable/var/cache/apt/archives/python-numpy-dev_1%3a1.0.1-2_amd64.deb
 (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite 
`/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/f2py/src/fortranobject.h', which is 
also in package python-numpy


Kurt



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: bug 410850 is not forwarded

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
 notforwarded 410850
Bug#410850: CVE-2006-6980: magnatune shell escapes
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138499.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410946: debsecan: Overwrites local configuration

2007-02-14 Thread Frank Küster
Package: debsecan
Version: 0.4.3.5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3, http://release.debian.org/etch_rc_policy.txt (3., 
last paragraph)

$ cat /etc/cron.d/debsecan 
# cron entry for debsecan
#
# AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED
# (Delete the preceding line if you edit this file.)

40 * * * * daemon test -x /usr/bin/debsecan  /usr/bin/debsecan --suite etch 
--mailto root --cron
# (Note: debsecan delays actual processing past 2:00 AM, and runs only
# once per day.)

This is not acceptable behavior.

In detail: The postinst script of debsecan overwrites local changes,
because the config script does not look into the configuration file,
just into the debconf database (which is *not* meant as a registry), and
the postinst relies on the debconf information and the presence of the
AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED line.

Since all that debsecan-create-cron does is to choose a random time, set
the suite and decide whether the file should exist at all, it shouldn't
be hard to do that in a policy-conformant way:

- chosing a random time is only needed when the file doesn't exist

- the suite can be changed by a simple sed -i command

- I suggest not to remove the file, but instead add a comment sign
  before the cron line (or remove it, to enable), which can also be done
  easily with sed.

Regards, Frank


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages debsecan depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii  python2.4.4-2An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-apt0.6.19 Python interface to libapt-pkg

Versions of packages debsecan recommends:
ii  cron  3.0pl1-100 management of regular background p
ii  exim4 4.63-17metapackage to ease exim MTA (v4) 
ii  exim4-daemon-light [mail-tran 4.63-17lightweight exim MTA (v4) daemon

-- debconf information:
* debsecan/report: true
* debsecan/suite: etch

-- 
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)



Bug#402389: Doesn't look like a bug in usbmount

2007-02-14 Thread trigger
Thanks for you're message!

Rolandas Juodzbalis wrote:
 To be completely sure you can set VERBOSE=no in
 /etc/usbmount/usbmount.conf

Oups, VERBOSE=yes for sure :-)
Can you please try this with your camera and show me the logs in this case?

 p.s. you can close this bug, because I already got card reader and use it.

I think I will downgrade it at least.
Will close it only if I'm sure it's no bug in usbmount (which I still
beleave)

 p.p.s I cannot mount it manually after inserting. Only after removing
 usbmount it can be done manually.

Weird...

/Armin




Bug#410948: license issues with des.tcl

2007-02-14 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Package: amsn
Version: 0.95+dfsg2-0.2
Severity: serious

des.tcl contains the following paragraph at the end of its license
terms:

GOVERNMENT USE: If you are acquiring this software on behalf of the U.S. 
government, the Government shall have only Restricted Rights in the software 
and related documentation as defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulations 
(FARs) in Clause 52.227.19 (c) (2).  If you are acquiring the software on 
behalf of the Department of Defense, the software shall be classified as 
Commercial Computer Software and the Government shall have only Restricted 
Rights as defined in Clause 252.227-7013 (c) (1) of DFARs.  Notwithstanding 
the foregoing, the authors grant the U.S. Government and others acting in its 
behalf permission to use and distribute the software in accordance with the 
terms specified in this license.

IANAL, but this seems to prohibit some things allowed by the GPL to the U.S. 
government. If I understand right, the U.S. Department of Defense is not 
allowed to redistribute or copy freely des.tcl, which would violate the DFSG.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410956: xorg: xserver freezes irregularly when applications use lots of memory

2007-02-14 Thread Arjen Bax
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.1.0-11
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system


From time to time, especially when using big applications (e.g., Gimp)
the system just freezes, leaving nothing in the syslog. The only way of
recovering is by switching off and on the power switch. I finally
succeeded in capturing some log messages that appeared on the tty of a
remote logged-in user. It mentions 'kernel BUG' and the process Xorg, so
I thought it wise to send in a bug report.

I'll be happy to send in any extra info you'll need, but so far I have
not succeeded in reliably reproducing the freeze events.

cut
Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Feb 14 10:04:52 2007 ...
aglarond kernel: [ cut here ]
aglarond kernel: kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:587!
aglarond kernel: invalid opcode:  [#1]
aglarond kernel: SMP
aglarond kernel: CPU:0
aglarond kernel: EIP is at page_remove_rmap+0x14/0x2d
aglarond kernel: eax:    ebx: c10bf640   ecx: c10bf640   edx: c10bf640
aglarond kernel: esi: b232d000   edi: 0020   ebp: c5f2dcb4   esp: da7e7f00
aglarond kernel: ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
aglarond kernel: Process Xorg (pid: 3015, ti=da7e6000 task=da601000 
task.ti=da7e6000)
aglarond kernel: Stack: c014b88f b2317000 cbe62da0 da7e7f6c   
b240 d9cecb20
aglarond kernel:d9c3fac0 c14040c0 ffea  c10be5ac d9cecb20 
003e9000 b26a3000
aglarond kernel: c14040c0 d9c3fac0 d9f56d4c cef662cc c014de97 
b26a3000 da7e7f68
aglarond kernel: Call Trace:
aglarond kernel: Code: ff ff 85 c0 89 c6 75 c9 b0 01 86 43 28 83 c4 20 89 e8 5b 
5e 5f 5d c3 89 c1 90 83 40 08 ff 0f 98 c0 84 c0 74 1e 8b 41 08 40 79 08 0f 0b 
4b 02 15 aa 29 c0 8b 51 10 89 c8 83 f2 01 83 e2 01 e9 f3
aglarond kernel: EIP: [c01506e9] page_remove_rmap+0x14/0x2d SS:ESP 
0068:da7e7f00
/cut
(Each 'aglarond' line was preceded with a similar 'Message from' line, which I 
removed except the very first.)

lspci reports as graphics card:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400/G450 (rev 04)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages xorg depends on:
ii  gnome-terminal [x-term 2.14.2-1  The GNOME 2 terminal emulator appl
ii  konsole [x-terminal-em 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 X terminal emulator for KDE
ii  libgl1-mesa-dri6.5.1-0.5 A free implementation of the OpenG
ii  libgl1-mesa-glx6.5.1-0.5 A free implementation of the OpenG
ii  libglu1-mesa   6.5.1-0.5 The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
ii  rxvt [x-terminal-emula 1:2.6.4-10VT102 terminal emulator for the X 
ii  type-handling [not+spa 0.2.19dpkg architecture generation scrip
ii  xbase-clients  1:7.1.ds1-2   miscellaneous X clients
ii  xfonts-100dpi  1:1.0.0-3 100 dpi fonts for X
ii  xfonts-75dpi   1:1.0.0-3 75 dpi fonts for X
ii  xfonts-base1:1.0.0-4 standard fonts for X
ii  xfonts-scalable1:1.0.0-6 scalable fonts for X
ii  xkb-data   0.9-4 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu
ii  xserver-xorg   1:7.1.0-11the X.Org X server
ii  xterm [x-terminal-emul 222-1etch2X terminal emulator
ii  xutils 1:7.1.ds.3-1  X Window System utility programs

xorg recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410821: Which data loss?

2007-02-14 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 13/02/2007 Philippe Cloutier wrote:
 
 
 Justification: causes non-serious data loss
 
 Which data loss does this cause?

The data that you submit before the server crashs.

...
 jonas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#370186: marked as done (hal: HAL keeps CD drive spinning constantly)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:17:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#370186: fixed in hal 0.5.8.1-6.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: hal
Version: 0.5.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable


This damages hardware.  Hence the 'grave' severity.

The only fix I have found for this is to uninstall HAL.

su-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (499, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages hal depends on:
ii  adduser   3.87   Add and remove users and groups
ii  dbus  0.61-5 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libc6 2.3.6-7GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdbus-1-2   0.61-5 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2  0.61-5 simple interprocess messaging syst
ii  libexpat1 1.95.8-3.2 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii  libglib2.0-0  2.10.2-1   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libhal1   0.5.7-1Hardware Abstraction Layer - share
ii  libusb-0.1-4  2:0.1.12-2 userspace USB programming library
ii  lsb-base  3.1-5  Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
ii  pciutils  1:2.1.11-16Linux PCI Utilities
ii  udev  0.091-2/dev/ and hotplug management daemo
ii  usbutils  0.71+cvs20051029-4 USB console utilities

hal recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: hal
Source-Version: 0.5.8.1-6.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
hal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

hal-device-manager_0.5.8.1-6.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal-device-manager_0.5.8.1-6.1_all.deb
hal-doc_0.5.8.1-6.1_all.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal-doc_0.5.8.1-6.1_all.deb
hal_0.5.8.1-6.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.5.8.1-6.1.diff.gz
hal_0.5.8.1-6.1.dsc
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.5.8.1-6.1.dsc
hal_0.5.8.1-6.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/hal_0.5.8.1-6.1_i386.deb
libhal-dev_0.5.8.1-6.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-dev_0.5.8.1-6.1_i386.deb
libhal-storage-dev_0.5.8.1-6.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-storage-dev_0.5.8.1-6.1_i386.deb
libhal-storage1_0.5.8.1-6.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal-storage1_0.5.8.1-6.1_i386.deb
libhal1_0.5.8.1-6.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/h/hal/libhal1_0.5.8.1-6.1_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated hal package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:42:29 -0800
Source: hal
Binary: libhal-dev libhal-storage1 hal-doc libhal-storage-dev hal libhal1 
hal-device-manager
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.5.8.1-6.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 hal- Hardware Abstraction Layer
 hal-device-manager - Hardware Abstraction Layer user interface
 hal-doc- Hardware Abstraction Layer - documentation
 libhal-dev - Hardware Abstraction Layer - development files
 libhal-storage-dev - Hardware Abstraction Layer - development files
 libhal-storage1 - Hardware Abstraction Layer - shared library for storage 
devices
 libhal1- Hardware Abstraction Layer - shared library
Closes: 370186
Changes: 
 hal (0.5.8.1-6.1) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * High-urgency upload for RC bugfix.
   * Provide /usr/share/doc/hal/examples/no-cd-media-check.fdi as an example
 for disabling CD ROM media checks, and document this in README.Debian, as
 a workaround for CD drives with broken firmware.  Closes: #370186.
Files: 
 4947d05baedcf5978966ab30d1487184 997 admin 

Bug#410951: r-other-gking-matchit: sarge to etch upgrade fails

2007-02-14 Thread Bill Allombert
Package: r-other-gking-matchit
Version: 1.0-1-1
Severity: serious

Hello Dirk,

Upgrading r-other-gking-matchit from sarge to etch fails with

   Preparing to replace r-other-gking-matchit 1.0-1-1 (using 
.../r-other-gking-matchit_2.2-11-1_all.deb) ...
   Unpacking replacement r-other-gking-matchit ...
   /usr/bin/R: line 113: /usr/lib/R/etc/ldpaths: No such file or directory
   dpkg: warning - old post-removal script returned error exit status 1
   dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
   dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/r-other-gking-matchit_2.2-11-1_all.deb (--unpack):
there is no script in the new version of the package - giving up

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Imagine a large blue swirl here. 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#409688: marked as done (FTBFS: gpe/render.h: No such file or directory)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:17:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#409688: fixed in gpe-julia 0.0.6-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: gpe-julia
Version: 0.0.6-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

This package fails to build in sid (but not in etch):

 Automatic build of gpe-julia_0.0.6-3 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.52
...
 cc -Os -fomit-frame-pointer  -MD -Wall -DPNG_NO_MMX_CODE 
 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 
 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12  
  -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPACKAGE=\gpe-julia\ -DPREFIX=\/usr\ 
 -DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DENABLE_NLS 
 -DPACKAGE=\gpe-julia\ -DPREFIX=\/usr\ 
 -DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -c main.c -o main.o
 main.c:22:24: error: gpe/render.h: No such file or directory
 make[1]: *** [main.o] Error 1
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/gpe-julia-0.0.6'
 make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: gpe-julia
Source-Version: 0.0.6-3.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gpe-julia, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gpe-julia_0.0.6-3.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gpe-julia/gpe-julia_0.0.6-3.1.diff.gz
gpe-julia_0.0.6-3.1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gpe-julia/gpe-julia_0.0.6-3.1.dsc
gpe-julia_0.0.6-3.1_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/g/gpe-julia/gpe-julia_0.0.6-3.1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gpe-julia package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:33:10 +
Source: gpe-julia
Binary: gpe-julia
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.0.6-3.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Moray Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 gpe-julia  - Julia/Mandelbrot set generator for GPE
Closes: 409688
Changes: 
 gpe-julia (0.0.6-3.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * FTBFS: gpe/render.h: No such file or directory (Closes: #409688)
Files: 
 9f31eb670c32ee49bd3122d911324c77 631 graphics optional gpe-julia_0.0.6-3.1.dsc
 1c79e33921f8dcd6216f32ecd294712c 4616 graphics optional 
gpe-julia_0.0.6-3.1.diff.gz
 a05f7608eef7c670da879eaefdade53f 15858 graphics optional 
gpe-julia_0.0.6-3.1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF03q1iAEJSii8s+MRAtBIAJ4t8E9l3KgihJc1yxYm8nHV+UMhBACgphtG
PsUWbg6HwYr6mGvM5igSOmo=
=oPVs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#409523: marked as done (FTBFS: gpe/render.h: No such file or directory)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:17:02 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#409523: fixed in gpe-edit 0.25-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: gpe-edit
Version: 0.25-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

This package fails to build in sid (but not in etch):

 Automatic build of gpe-edit_0.25-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.52
...
 dh_testdir
 /usr/bin/make CVSBUILD=no PREFIX=/usr
 make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/gpe-edit-0.25'
 cc -Os -fomit-frame-pointer  -MD -Wall -DPNG_NO_MMX_CODE 
 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 
 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 
 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12  
  -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPACKAGE=\gpe-edit\ -DPREFIX=\/usr\ 
 -DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -c main.c -o main.o
 main.c:24:24: error: gpe/render.h: No such file or directory
 make[1]: *** [main.o] Error 1
 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/gpe-edit-0.25'

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: gpe-edit
Source-Version: 0.25-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gpe-edit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gpe-edit_0.25-1.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gpe-edit/gpe-edit_0.25-1.1.diff.gz
gpe-edit_0.25-1.1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gpe-edit/gpe-edit_0.25-1.1.dsc
gpe-edit_0.25-1.1_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/g/gpe-edit/gpe-edit_0.25-1.1_amd64.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated gpe-edit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:32:34 +
Source: gpe-edit
Binary: gpe-edit
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.25-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Phil Blundell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 gpe-edit   - GPE Palmtop Environment text editor
Closes: 409523
Changes: 
 gpe-edit (0.25-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * FTBFS: gpe/render.h: No such file or directory (Closes: #409523)
Files: 
 040af0d44a95b0e0fc4ff7fbb981fea9 659 x11 optional gpe-edit_0.25-1.1.dsc
 52a79f3be71697fd18cd944bdac60003 7069 x11 optional gpe-edit_0.25-1.1.diff.gz
 803b78ffbba3716f2a224293c36f74f8 25804 x11 optional gpe-edit_0.25-1.1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF03tXiAEJSii8s+MRAreMAJ467t+krcMv4IXm9teaJM/lPwze6wCfTxtb
sgNCjcTezcMU6HklXNv9nZA=
=pJSp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Bug#410956: xorg: xserver freezes irregularly when applications use lots of memory

2007-02-14 Thread Julien Cristau
severity 410956 important
reassign 410956 linux-2.6
thanks

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 22:13:11 +0100, Arjen Bax wrote:

 Package: xorg
 Version: 1:7.1.0-11
 Severity: critical
 Justification: breaks the whole system
 
 
 From time to time, especially when using big applications (e.g., Gimp)
 the system just freezes, leaving nothing in the syslog. The only way of
 recovering is by switching off and on the power switch. I finally
 succeeded in capturing some log messages that appeared on the tty of a
 remote logged-in user. It mentions 'kernel BUG' and the process Xorg, so
 I thought it wise to send in a bug report.
 
 I'll be happy to send in any extra info you'll need, but so far I have
 not succeeded in reliably reproducing the freeze events.
 
This looks like a kernel bug to me, reassigning.

 cut
 Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Wed Feb 14 10:04:52 2007 ...
 aglarond kernel: [ cut here ]
 aglarond kernel: kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:587!
 aglarond kernel: invalid opcode:  [#1]
 aglarond kernel: SMP
 aglarond kernel: CPU:0
 aglarond kernel: EIP is at page_remove_rmap+0x14/0x2d
 aglarond kernel: eax:    ebx: c10bf640   ecx: c10bf640   edx: c10bf640
 aglarond kernel: esi: b232d000   edi: 0020   ebp: c5f2dcb4   esp: da7e7f00
 aglarond kernel: ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
 aglarond kernel: Process Xorg (pid: 3015, ti=da7e6000 task=da601000 
 task.ti=da7e6000)
 aglarond kernel: Stack: c014b88f b2317000 cbe62da0 da7e7f6c   
 b240 d9cecb20
 aglarond kernel:d9c3fac0 c14040c0 ffea  c10be5ac d9cecb20 
 003e9000 b26a3000
 aglarond kernel: c14040c0 d9c3fac0 d9f56d4c cef662cc c014de97 
 b26a3000 da7e7f68
 aglarond kernel: Call Trace:
 aglarond kernel: Code: ff ff 85 c0 89 c6 75 c9 b0 01 86 43 28 83 c4 20 89 e8 
 5b 5e 5f 5d c3 89 c1 90 83 40 08 ff 0f 98 c0 84 c0 74 1e 8b 41 08 40 79 08 
 0f 0b 4b 02 15 aa 29 c0 8b 51 10 89 c8 83 f2 01 83 e2 01 e9 f3
 aglarond kernel: EIP: [c01506e9] page_remove_rmap+0x14/0x2d SS:ESP 
 0068:da7e7f00
 /cut
 (Each 'aglarond' line was preceded with a similar 'Message from' line, which 
 I removed except the very first.)
 
 lspci reports as graphics card:
 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400/G450 (rev 
 04)
 
 -- System Information:
 Debian Release: 4.0
   APT prefers testing
   APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
 Architecture: i386 (i686)
 Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
 Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
 
 Versions of packages xorg depends on:
 ii  gnome-terminal [x-term 2.14.2-1  The GNOME 2 terminal emulator 
 appl
 ii  konsole [x-terminal-em 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 X terminal emulator for KDE
 ii  libgl1-mesa-dri6.5.1-0.5 A free implementation of the 
 OpenG
 ii  libgl1-mesa-glx6.5.1-0.5 A free implementation of the 
 OpenG
 ii  libglu1-mesa   6.5.1-0.5 The OpenGL utility library (GLU)
 ii  rxvt [x-terminal-emula 1:2.6.4-10VT102 terminal emulator for the 
 X 
 ii  type-handling [not+spa 0.2.19dpkg architecture generation 
 scrip
 ii  xbase-clients  1:7.1.ds1-2   miscellaneous X clients
 ii  xfonts-100dpi  1:1.0.0-3 100 dpi fonts for X
 ii  xfonts-75dpi   1:1.0.0-3 75 dpi fonts for X
 ii  xfonts-base1:1.0.0-4 standard fonts for X
 ii  xfonts-scalable1:1.0.0-6 scalable fonts for X
 ii  xkb-data   0.9-4 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) 
 configu
 ii  xserver-xorg   1:7.1.0-11the X.Org X server
 ii  xterm [x-terminal-emul 222-1etch2X terminal emulator
 ii  xutils 1:7.1.ds.3-1  X Window System utility programs
 
 xorg recommends no packages.
 
 -- no debconf information


pgpvs2Z6JvSCl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: Re: Bug#410956: xorg: xserver freezes irregularly when applications use lots of memory

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 410956 important
Bug#410956: xorg: xserver freezes irregularly when applications use lots of 
memory
Severity set to `important' from `critical'

 reassign 410956 linux-2.6
Bug#410956: xorg: xserver freezes irregularly when applications use lots of 
memory
Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `linux-2.6'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 410079 is important, severity of 410093 is important, severity of 410094 is important

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
 severity 410079 important
Bug#410079: hyphenation patterns distributed without license and copyright
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

 severity 410093 important
Bug#410093: hyphenation patterns distributed without license and copyright 
information
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

 severity 410094 important
Bug#410094: hyphenation patterns distributed without license and copyright 
information
Severity set to `important' from `serious'


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#402389: Doesn't look like a bug in usbmount

2007-02-14 Thread Rolandas Juodzbalis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks for you're message!
 
 Rolandas Juodzbalis wrote:
 To be completely sure you can set VERBOSE=no in
 /etc/usbmount/usbmount.conf
 
 Oups, VERBOSE=yes for sure :-)
 Can you please try this with your camera and show me the logs in this case?
 
 p.s. you can close this bug, because I already got card reader and use it.
 
 I think I will downgrade it at least.
 Will close it only if I'm sure it's no bug in usbmount (which I still
 beleave)
 
 p.p.s I cannot mount it manually after inserting. Only after removing
 usbmount it can be done manually.
 
 Weird...
 
 /Armin
 

I tried to completely reinstall usbmount. Did not helped. There is not
much info in logs when VERBOSE=yes. Only this one:
Feb 14 21:50:14 acer usbmount[31039]: cannot read from /dev/sdb1
I tried to attach ipod, which fails too, but fails in another way.
usbmount mounts it as /dev/sdb instead of /dev/sdb2
/dev/sdb on /media/usb1 type vfat (rw,noexec,nodev,sync,noatime)
There is info from /var/log/messages:
Feb 14 21:50:45 acer kernel:   Vendor: Apple Model: iPod
  Rev: 1.62
Feb 14 21:50:45 acer kernel:   Type:   Direct-Access
  ANSI SCSI revision: 00
Feb 14 21:50:45 acer kernel: SCSI device sdb: 7999487 512-byte hdwr
sectors (4096 MB)
Feb 14 21:50:45 acer kernel: sdb: Write Protect is off
Feb 14 21:50:45 acer kernel: SCSI device sdb: 7999487 512-byte hdwr
sectors (4096 MB)
Feb 14 21:50:45 acer kernel: sdb: Write Protect is off
Feb 14 21:50:46 acer kernel:  sdb: sdb1 sdb2
Feb 14 21:50:46 acer kernel: sd 14:0:0:0: Attached scsi removable disk sdb
Feb 14 21:50:46 acer usbmount[31215]: executing command: mount -tvfat
-osync,noexec,nodev,noatime /dev/sdb /media/usb1
Feb 14 21:50:46 acer usbmount[31215]: executing command: run-parts
/etc/usbmount/mount.d
Feb 14 21:50:47 acer usbmount[31281]: executing command: mount -tvfat
-osync,noexec,nodev,noatime /dev/sdb2 /media/usb2

After seeing this, now I believe that this might be udev problems?
Note: there is no mount /media/usb2 in mounts

mount |grep usb
procbususb on /proc/bus/usb type usbfs (rw)
/dev/sda1 on /media/usb0 type ext3 (rw,noexec,nodev,noatime)
/dev/sdb on /media/usb1 type vfat (rw,noexec,nodev,sync,noatime)

/dev/sda1 is mounted ok via usbmount, long time ago :)

Rolandas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#398240: marked as done (splashy freeze on shutdown.)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:07:11 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Reporter says it's fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: splashy
Version: 0.1.8.1-3.1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software


Hello,

I had trouble on halt/shutdown on my box for several days. I track it
done on splashy.

No enabling splashy with by ex. ENABLE=0 in /etc/default/splashy is
fine.

When splashy is enable, the box won't shutdown anymore, it just stays
frozen in different state of graphic screen (got a blue screen
yesterday).

This freeze seems to happen earlier since my upgrade to the last debian
kernel.

I don't have any idea how to dig in this, but I'm willing to follow
instructions.

$ lspci | grep VGA
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX
440 AGP 8x] (rev a2)

@+,
Fab


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-k7
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages splashy depends on:
ii  libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1  1:4.1.1-19  GCC support library

Versions of packages splashy recommends:
ii  lsb-base  3.1-19 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip

-- no debconf information

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Hi,

According to the reporter this bug is fixed. Closing it.

grts Tim


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
---End Message---


Processed: Not RC :-)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 402389 normal
Bug#402389: usbmount fails to mount flash devices
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'

 tags 377548 + confirmed
Bug#377548: usbmount: Fails mounting some parts in a n-in-1 device
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed

 tags 350633 + confirmed
Bug#350633: usbmount should respect /etc/fstab entries
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed

 tags 345364 + pending
Bug#345364: usbmount fails if /var/run/usbmount does not exist
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending

 tags 380809 + confirmed
Bug#380809: Add Option to disable usbmount
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed

 kthxbye
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: [Fwd: Re: Bug#410821: Which data loss?]

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 410821 important
Bug#410821: mysql-server-5.0: mysqld dies with '*** glibc detected *** double 
free or corruption (!prev): 0x08dd1dd0 ***'
Severity set to `important' from `grave'

 # Justification: causes *very* non-serious data loss
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410948: marked as done (license issues with des.tcl)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:34:47 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#410948: license issues with des.tcl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: amsn
Version: 0.95+dfsg2-0.2
Severity: serious

des.tcl contains the following paragraph at the end of its license
terms:

GOVERNMENT USE: If you are acquiring this software on behalf of the U.S. 
government, the Government shall have only Restricted Rights in the software 
and related documentation as defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulations 
(FARs) in Clause 52.227.19 (c) (2).  If you are acquiring the software on 
behalf of the Department of Defense, the software shall be classified as 
Commercial Computer Software and the Government shall have only Restricted 
Rights as defined in Clause 252.227-7013 (c) (1) of DFARs.  Notwithstanding 
the foregoing, the authors grant the U.S. Government and others acting in its 
behalf permission to use and distribute the software in accordance with the 
terms specified in this license.

IANAL, but this seems to prohibit some things allowed by the GPL to the U.S. 
government. If I understand right, the U.S. Department of Defense is not 
allowed to redistribute or copy freely des.tcl, which would violate the DFSG.

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:55:53PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
 Package: amsn
 Version: 0.95+dfsg2-0.2
 Severity: serious

 des.tcl contains the following paragraph at the end of its license
 terms:

 GOVERNMENT USE: If you are acquiring this software on behalf of the U.S.
 government, the Government shall have only Restricted Rights in the
 software and related documentation as defined in the Federal Acquisition
 Regulations (FARs) in Clause 52.227.19 (c) (2).  If you are acquiring the
 software on behalf of the Department of Defense, the software shall be
 classified as Commercial Computer Software and the Government shall have
 only Restricted Rights as defined in Clause 252.227-7013 (c) (1) of 
 DFARs.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the authors grant the U.S.
 Government and others acting in its behalf permission to use and
 distribute the software in accordance with the terms specified in this
 license.

 IANAL, but this seems to prohibit some things allowed by the GPL to the
 U.S. government. If I understand right, the U.S. Department of Defense is
 not allowed to redistribute or copy freely des.tcl, which would violate
 the DFSG.

No, this is a statement that the copyright on the work is not *waived* where
the federal government is concerned.  It doesn't contradict the GPL, it
merely clarifies that the government has no implicit, special rights over
the software beyond those specified in the GPL.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/
---End Message---


Processed: Re: Bug#410903: xkb-data: configuration files have been moved to /usr/share

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 410903 important
Bug#410903: xkb-data: configuration files have been moved to /usr/share
Severity set to `important' from `serious'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410978: rlwrap: missing binary packages e.g. amd64

2007-02-14 Thread Stuart Rowan
Package: rlwrap
Version: 0.24-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

So what I actually want is a way in reportbug of saying take the
packages currently in unstable (0.28-2) which exist for all
architectures.

Failing that, how about another go at building the version currently in
etch.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410850: CVE-2006-6980: magnatune shell escapes

2007-02-14 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:59:12PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
 Package: amarock
 Version: 1.4.4-2
 Severity: grave
 Tags: patch, security
 
 CVE-2006-6980 says[1]:
 
 The ruby handlers in Amarok do not properly quote text in certain 
 contexts, probably including construction of an unzip command line, 
 which allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell 
 metacharacters.
 
 There is an open KDE bug report[2], and SuSE has patched this 
 problem.  I'm working on extracting the patches now...
 
 
 [1] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6979
 [2] http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138499


As Kees says in a previuos mail, this CVE is misleading and it is
pointing to 2 security bugs. Upstream has fixed one of them:
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138499

And i'm still waiting for some input of the ruby scripts patches
(attached in this mail).

Ana
 
 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410903: xkb-data: configuration files have been moved to /usr/share

2007-02-14 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 410903 important
thanks

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:37:42PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
 I think that it is clear that these files actually are configuration
 files.  This has been discussed for example in #326637.  Reading through
 this bug, one gets the impression that everyone who spoke up agreed that
 it makes sense, and is actually done, to customize these files (or maybe
 rather, to add customization files in these directories, see below).

Sorry, a file is not automatically accorded config file status just because
someone wants to edit it.  It's not necessarily an RC bug for particular
aspects of a package's behavior to not be under direct user control by way
of config files, even if this was previously the case.

In my own experience, maintaining divergent xkb configs isn't particularly
practical because upstream's organization of them just isn't stable and the
indices (e.g., symbols.dir) are irritating to maintain.

I think that at least the .dir files ought to find their way back to
/etc/X11/xkb to let users add their own configs, but I don't think this
should be considered RC -- and that we are in fact better off not changing
this for etch, given the risk of error.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/



Bug#410978: marked as done (rlwrap: missing binary packages e.g. amd64)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:48:42 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#410978: rlwrap: missing binary packages e.g. amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: rlwrap
Version: 0.24-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

So what I actually want is a way in reportbug of saying take the
packages currently in unstable (0.28-2) which exist for all
architectures.

Failing that, how about another go at building the version currently in
etch.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---

Stuart Rowan wrote:


So what I actually want is a way in reportbug of saying take the
packages currently in unstable (0.28-2) which exist for all
architectures.

Failing that, how about another go at building the version currently in
etch.


This doesn't seem to be related to rlwrap, but the build system.  Talk 
to the buildd people.


--
Øyvind Grønnesby
---End Message---


Processed: reassign 326230 to installation-reports

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
 reassign 326230 installation-reports
Bug#326230: Sparc IPX install problem
Warning: Unknown package 'install'
Bug reassigned from package `install' to `installation-reports'.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410406: is wormux 0.7.4-3 affected, too?

2007-02-14 Thread artefact
Eddy Petrișor a écrit :
 I was wondering if the testing version of wormux is affected by this
 bug. I guess it is.
Not sure at all.
I think this comes from what I introduced in 0.7.9-2 to move pixmaps
from wormux-data to wormux.

The bug appeared when you want to build the arch independant part alone.

Jean

 --
 Regards,
 EddyP





Processed: [bts-link] source package gst-ffmpeg

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 #
 # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gst-ffmpeg
 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
 #
 user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
 # remote status report for #401304
 #  * http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383009
 #  * remote status changed: (?) - RESOLVED
 #  * remote resolution changed: (?) - FIXED
 #  * closed upstream
 tags 401304 + fixed-upstream
Bug#401304: CVE-2006-4800: GStreamer FFmpeg Plug-in Multiple Buffer Overflows
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed-upstream

 usertags 401304 + status-RESOLVED resolution-FIXED
Bug#401304: CVE-2006-4800: GStreamer FFmpeg Plug-in Multiple Buffer Overflows
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: resolution-FIXED status-RESOLVED.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410891: marked as done (FTBFS: includes kernel headers from user space)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#410891: fixed in quik 2.1-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: quik
Version: 2.1-8
Severity: serious

This package fails to build:

 Automatic build of quik_2.1-8 on test.track.rz.uni-augsburg.de by 
 sbuild/powerpc 0.52
...
 dh_testdir
 /usr/bin/make
 make[1]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/quik-2.1'
 make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/quik-2.1/util'
 gcc -O2 -Wall -o elfextract elfextract.c
 In file included from /usr/include/asm-generic/bitops/fls64.h:5,
  from /usr/include/asm/bitops.h:248,
  from /usr/include/linux/bitops.h:9,
  from /usr/include/linux/thread_info.h:20,
  from /usr/include/linux/preempt.h:9,
  from /usr/include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
  from /usr/include/linux/capability.h:45,
  from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:44,
  from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/elf.h:7,
  from elfextract.c:9:
 /usr/include/asm-generic/bitops/fls.h:13: error: conflicting types for 'fls'
 /usr/include/asm/bitops.h:242: error: previous definition of 'fls' was here
 In file included from /usr/include/linux/timex.h:57,
  from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:48,
  from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/elf.h:7,
  from elfextract.c:9:
 /usr/include/linux/time.h:16: error: redefinition of 'struct timespec'
 /usr/include/linux/time.h:22: error: redefinition of 'struct timeval'
 In file included from /usr/include/asm/div64.h:1,
  from /usr/include/linux/calc64.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:4,
  from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:49,
  from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/elf.h:7,
  from elfextract.c:9:
 /usr/include/asm-generic/div64.h:1:2: error: #error Do not include div64.h.
 In file included from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:49,
  from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/elf.h:7,
  from elfextract.c:9:
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:33:3: error: #error You lose.
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:210:31: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:254:46: error: division by zero in #if
 In file included from /usr/include/linux/sched.h:49,
  from /usr/include/asm/elf.h:5,
  from /usr/include/linux/elf.h:7,
  from elfextract.c:9:
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'jiffies_to_msecs':
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:259: error: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:259: error: (Each undeclared identifier is 
 reported only once
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:259: error: for each function it appears in.)
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:265:46: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'jiffies_to_usecs':
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:270: error: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:278:46: error: division by zero in #if
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'msecs_to_jiffies':
 /usr/include/linux/jiffies.h:283: error: 'CONFIG_HZ' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 

Bug#410978: rlwrap: missing binary packages e.g. amd64

2007-02-14 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 410978 important
thanks

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:58:34PM +, Stuart Rowan wrote:
 Package: rlwrap
 Version: 0.24-2
 Severity: grave
 Justification: renders package unusable

 So what I actually want is a way in reportbug of saying take the
 packages currently in unstable (0.28-2) which exist for all
 architectures.

 Failing that, how about another go at building the version currently in
 etch.

This isn't a bug in rlwrap at all, and certainly not a release-critical one.
Unfortunately, it does appear to be a problem in wanna-build that I can't
easily work around: the wanna-build database seems to not list any packages
as needing builds once they've passed from testing-proposed-updates to
testing.

I don't have a good way to get rlwrap into testing for amd64 without another
upload.  But the maintainer could fix this easily enough by doing a new,
no-change sourceful upload to testing-proposed-updates.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.debian.org/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed (with 1 errors): setting package to libnautilus-extension1 libnautilus-extension-dev nautilus nautilus-data nautilus-dbg ... ...

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
 package libnautilus-extension1 libnautilus-extension-dev nautilus 
 nautilus-data nautilus-dbg
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libnautilus-extension1 nautilus-data 
libnautilus-extension-dev nautilus nautilus-dbg

 tags 408556 + pending
Bug#408556: SECURITY: Specially crafted .desktop files can disguise as harmless 
files
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending

 tags 408948 + pending
Bug number 408948 belongs to package gnome-vfs2, skipping.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#410978: rlwrap: missing binary packages e.g. amd64

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 410978 important
Bug#410978: rlwrap: missing binary packages e.g. amd64
Severity set to `important' from `grave'

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410999: kicker fails to push up the panel after update

2007-02-14 Thread Lothar Guthmann
Package: kicker
Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6
Severity: grave

Hi,


I updated kicker from 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-5 to 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6
and after that the panel failed to push up when the mouse pointer
touched the bottom edge.

Workaround: I configured the panel to raise when touching the
top edge and then configured the panel to raise when touching the
bottom edge.

Now the kicker works as usual.

I am using Debian GNU/Linux 4.0, kernel 2.6.18-3-k7
and libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11

Greetings, Lothar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): merging 409750 409440

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 409440 mysql-server-5.0
Bug#409440: mysql-common: Upgrade to 5.0.32-3 thinks I modified my.cnf which is 
not the case
Bug reassigned from package `mysql-common' to `mysql-server-5.0'.

 severity 409440 serious
Bug#409440: mysql-common: Upgrade to 5.0.32-3 thinks I modified my.cnf which is 
not the case
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'

 merge 409750 409440
Bug#409440: mysql-common: Upgrade to 5.0.32-3 thinks I modified my.cnf which is 
not the case
Bug#409750: touches conffile (/etc/mysql/my.cnf) of other package (mysql-common)
Merged 409440 409750.

 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: severity of 410999 is normal

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
 severity 410999 normal
Bug#410999: kicker fails to push up the panel after update
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#409750: marked as done (touches conffile (/etc/mysql/my.cnf) of other package (mysql-common))

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:02:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#409750: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.32-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: mysql-server-5.0
Version: 5.0.32-3
Severity: serious

mysql-server-5.0's postinst modifies /etc/mysql/my.cnf to add/change the
old_passwd setting, in violation of policy 10.7.3 and 10.7.4.

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Source-Version: 5.0.32-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mysql-dfsg-5.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libmysqlclient15-dev_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/libmysqlclient15-dev_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
libmysqlclient15off_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/libmysqlclient15off_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
mysql-client-5.0_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-client-5.0_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
mysql-client_5.0.32-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-client_5.0.32-4_all.deb
mysql-common_5.0.32-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-common_5.0.32-4_all.deb
mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-4.diff.gz
mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-4.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-4.dsc
mysql-server-4.1_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-server-4.1_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
mysql-server-5.0_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-server-5.0_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
mysql-server_5.0.32-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-server_5.0.32-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mysql-dfsg-5.0 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:14:09 +0100
Source: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Binary: libmysqlclient15-dev mysql-client mysql-client-5.0 mysql-server 
mysql-server-4.1 mysql-server-5.0 mysql-common libmysqlclient15off
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 5.0.32-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 libmysqlclient15-dev - mysql database development files
 libmysqlclient15off - mysql database client library
 mysql-client - mysql database client (meta package depending on the latest 
versi
 mysql-client-5.0 - mysql database client binaries
 mysql-common - mysql database common files (e.g. /etc/mysql/my.cnf)
 mysql-server - mysql database server (meta package depending on the latest 
versi
 mysql-server-4.1 - mysql database server (transitional package)
 mysql-server-5.0 - mysql database server binaries
Closes: 409750
Changes: 
 mysql-dfsg-5.0 (5.0.32-4) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   [Christian Hammers]
   * Changed minimum required version in dh_makeshlibs to 5.0.27-1 as
 5.0.26 had an ABI breakage in it!
 This is the cause for Perl programs crashing with the following error:
 Transactions not supported by database at /usr/lib/perl5/DBI.pm line 672
   * The old_passwords setting that is set according to a Debconf question is
 now written to /etc/mysql/conf.d/old_passwords.cnf instead directly to the
 conffile /etc/mysql/my.cnf which would be fobidden by policy (thanks to
 Robert Bihlmeyer). Closes: #409750
   * Added some more comments to the default my.cnf.
   [Monty Taylor]
   * Added bison to build dependencies.
   * Added a start-initial option to the Data Node init script to support
 initial node starts.
   * Changed NDB Data and Management node startup seqence. Prevented both from
 restarting on upgrade to address rolling upgrade issues.
   * Updated build-depends to depend on automake1.9 instead of automake1.8
 to match what upstream uses.
Files: 
 2492aa39b6dd0efcf5734b711e1085c0 1115 misc optional mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-4.dsc
 f2e5d838a3d0c3a764e5b9d6134f8dc5 145421 misc optional 
mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-4.diff.gz
 fda646b14c4c830f36142f2bcc045dcf 52278 misc optional 

Bug#409440: marked as done (mysql-common: Upgrade to 5.0.32-3 thinks I modified my.cnf which is not the case)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:02:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#409750: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.32-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: mysql-common
Version: 5.0.32-3
Severity: normal

During upgrade from 5.0.30-3 to 5.0.32-3 I got the following message:

Configuration file `/etc/mysql/my.cnf'
 == Modified (by you or by a script) since installation.
 == Package distributor has shipped an updated version.
   What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:
Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version
N or O  : keep your currently-installed version
  D : show the differences between the versions
  Z : background this process to examine the situation
 The default action is to keep your current version.
*** my.cnf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ?

I never modified this file. The diff looks like this:

--- /etc/mysql/my.cnf.dpkg-old  2006-11-28 19:18:52.0 +0100
+++ /etc/mysql/my.cnf   2007-01-27 13:32:34.0 +0100
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 nice   = 0
 
 [mysqld]
-old_passwords = false # inserted by debconf
+old_passwords  = false
 # Activate the above for connections from hosts running Debian Woody/Sarge!
 #
 # Prior to MySQL 5.0, user passwords were stored in a rather weak way. This
@@ -90,8 +90,7 @@
 #
 # * BerkeleyDB
 #
-# According to an MySQL employee the use of BerkeleyDB is now discouraged
-# and support for it will probably cease in the next versions.
+# Using BerkeleyDB is now discouraged as its support will cease in 5.1.12.
 skip-bdb
 #
 # * InnoDB
@@ -130,8 +129,8 @@
 #
 # See /usr/share/doc/mysql-server-*/README.Debian for more information.
 #
-# The following configuration is read by the ndbd storage daemons,
-# not from the ndb_mgmd management daemon.
+# The following configuration is read by the NDB Data Nodes (ndbd processes)
+# not from the NDB Management Nodes (ndb_mgmd processes).
 #
 # [MYSQL_CLUSTER]
 # ndb-connectstring=127.0.0.1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Source-Version: 5.0.32-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
mysql-dfsg-5.0, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libmysqlclient15-dev_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/libmysqlclient15-dev_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
libmysqlclient15off_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/libmysqlclient15off_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
mysql-client-5.0_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-client-5.0_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
mysql-client_5.0.32-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-client_5.0.32-4_all.deb
mysql-common_5.0.32-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-common_5.0.32-4_all.deb
mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-4.diff.gz
mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-4.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-4.dsc
mysql-server-4.1_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-server-4.1_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
mysql-server-5.0_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-server-5.0_5.0.32-4_amd64.deb
mysql-server_5.0.32-4_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-server_5.0.32-4_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated mysql-dfsg-5.0 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:14:09 +0100
Source: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Binary: libmysqlclient15-dev mysql-client mysql-client-5.0 mysql-server 
mysql-server-4.1 mysql-server-5.0 mysql-common libmysqlclient15off
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 5.0.32-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Christian Hammers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Christian Hammers [EMAIL 

Bug#410943: User-specific?

2007-02-14 Thread Philippe Cloutier

Hi,
I'm just trying to evaluate the severity, but does this happen for all 
users on your system? For example, if you create a new user?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#410871: marked as done (postfix: Postfix 2.3.7-1 install broken on unstable)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:02:21 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#410871: fixed in postfix 2.3.7-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: postfix
Version: 2.3.7-1
Severity: serious


Postfix 2.3.7-1 is broken on the unstable, could not be installed:

Setting up postfix (2.3.7-1) ...
dpkg: error processing postfix (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 20
Errors were encountered while processing:
 postfix
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
 A package failed to install.  Trying to recover:
Setting up postfix (2.3.7-1) ...
dpkg: error processing postfix (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 20
Errors were encountered while processing:
 postfix

Someone else seems to have the same issue (dutch forum):
http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/list_messages/1197751

When I run /var/lib/dpkg/info/postfix.postinst configure it just exits
like that with no debug:

exit 20/var/lib/dpkg/info/postfix.postinst configure

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.2-grsec
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages postfix depends on:
ii  adduser   3.102  Add and remove users and groups
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii  dpkg  1.13.25package maintenance system for Deb
ii  libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11   GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libdb4.3  4.3.29-7   Berkeley v4.3 Database Libraries [
ii  libsasl2-22.1.22.dfsg1-8 Authentication abstraction library
ii  libssl0.9.8   0.9.8c-4   SSL shared libraries
ii  lsb-base  3.1-23 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
ii  netbase   4.29   Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii  ssl-cert  1.0.14 Simple debconf wrapper for openssl

Versions of packages postfix recommends:
ii  mailx [mail-read 1:8.1.2-0.20050715cvs-1 A simple mail user agent
ii  mutt [mail-reade 1.5.13-1.1  text-based mailreader supporting M

-- debconf information excluded

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: postfix
Source-Version: 2.3.7-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
postfix, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

postfix-cdb_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postfix/postfix-cdb_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
postfix-dev_2.3.7-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/postfix/postfix-dev_2.3.7-3_all.deb
postfix-doc_2.3.7-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/p/postfix/postfix-doc_2.3.7-3_all.deb
postfix-ldap_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postfix/postfix-ldap_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
postfix-mysql_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postfix/postfix-mysql_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
postfix-pcre_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postfix/postfix-pcre_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
postfix-pgsql_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postfix/postfix-pgsql_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
postfix_2.3.7-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/postfix/postfix_2.3.7-3.diff.gz
postfix_2.3.7-3.dsc
  to pool/main/p/postfix/postfix_2.3.7-3.dsc
postfix_2.3.7-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/postfix/postfix_2.3.7-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated postfix package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:41:37 -0700
Source: postfix
Binary: postfix-pcre postfix postfix-pgsql postfix-doc postfix-ldap postfix-cdb 
postfix-dev postfix-mysql
Architecture: all i386 source 
Version: 2.3.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: LaMont Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 postfix- A high-performance mail transport agent
 postfix-cdb - CDB map support for Postfix
 postfix-dev - Postfix loadable 

Bug#410843: marked as done (spamassassin: URI parsing causes local DoS)

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:47:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#410843: fixed in spamassassin 3.1.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.1.7-1
Severity: important
Tags: security patch


There is a DoS in apparantly all versions of spamassassin prior to
3.1.8 (which is not released yet). The details of this are obtained
through this bugzilla log:

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5318

As well as a patch to fix the issue for 3.1.8. This will likely require
a backported fix for sarge. 

CVE id to be assigned shortly.

Micah


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-vserver-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages spamassassin depends on:
ii  libdigest-sha1-perl   2.11-2 NIST SHA-1 message digest algorith
ii  libhtml-parser-perl   3.56-1 A collection of modules that parse
ii  libnet-dns-perl   0.59-1 Perform DNS queries from a Perl sc
pn  libsocket6-perl   none (no description available)
ii  perl  5.8.8-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

Versions of packages spamassassin recommends:
pn  libmail-spf-query-perlnone (no description available)
ii  perl [libmime-base64-perl]5.8.8-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
pn  spamc none (no description available)

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: spamassassin
Source-Version: 3.1.7-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
spamassassin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

spamassassin_3.1.7-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.1.7-2.diff.gz
spamassassin_3.1.7-2.dsc
  to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.1.7-2.dsc
spamassassin_3.1.7-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamassassin_3.1.7-2_all.deb
spamc_3.1.7-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/s/spamassassin/spamc_3.1.7-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated spamassassin package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 21:46:52 -0500
Source: spamassassin
Binary: spamassassin spamc
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 3.1.7-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changed-By: Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 spamassassin - Perl-based spam filter using text analysis
 spamc  - Client for SpamAssassin spam filtering daemon
Closes: 410843
Changes: 
 spamassassin (3.1.7-2) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Security fixes backported from 3.1.8:
 - CVE-2007-0451: potential DoS with long URIs found in the message
 content (Closes: #410843)
 - Prevents perl code from being loaded via sa-update by default
 (override with --allowplugins) (SpamAssassin bug 5240)
Files: 
 a28f5809ec45cec91bf1e8617782ab82 738 mail optional spamassassin_3.1.7-2.dsc
 70f3d69e81dd5f7e6ecd819709565103 30993 mail optional 
spamassassin_3.1.7-2.diff.gz
 e154445c3a04bb4b7da52088c3c2dfa4 973862 mail optional 
spamassassin_3.1.7-2_all.deb
 4aa3fc65789fd755e223666a475869b8 75246 mail optional spamc_3.1.7-2_i386.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF0++wqjUzNGvmnNARAnNRAJ9EFQu/jIL7GYuiC4oaz74bbfw1SwCglUlX
urP3aAIg57F9ITMUKsrlhhA=
=IzT9
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

---End Message---


Processed: severity of 410995 is grave, merging 410561 410995

2007-02-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27ubuntu7
 severity 410995 grave
Bug#410995: new upstream version 5.2.1 available
Severity set to `grave' from `important'

 # whoops, I can't read
 merge 410561 410995
Bug#410561: php5: multiple security issues fixed in php 5.2.1
Bug#410995: new upstream version 5.2.1 available
Merged 410561 410995.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]