Processed: unblock: python-gnupg/0.3.0-1.1

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 block -1 by 682648
Bug #691222 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-gnupg/0.3.0-1.1
691222 was not blocked by any bugs.
691222 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 691222: 682648

-- 
691222: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691222
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688891: psad: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/psad/psad.conf

2012-10-23 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 22:22:06 +0200, Franck Joncourt wrote:

 I'm attaching a diff that implements my ideas from the last mail;
 Thank you very much.

You're welcome :)
 
 still, I'm not sure about the unconditional replacing in the postinst
 ...
 In the postinst script the psad.conf file is left in place if one is
 found, and if none, the embedded copie is placed in /etc/psad. So I
 am not sure what you mean by unconditional.

Sorry for being unclear; I didn't mean replacing the file, but
udpating the values within the file, i.e. lines 44/45 (in git):

  44 NAME=`hostname`
  45 update_conf $NAME HOSTNAME /etc/psad/psad.conf

This will overwrite the HOSTNAME variable in the file (also on
updates), which could have been been changed by the admin. - And
that's where I'm not sure ...

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   BOFH excuse #294:  PCMCIA slave driver 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691223: atanks: source tarball includes Win32 binaries without source

2012-10-23 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Package: src:atanks
Version: 5.5-1
Severity: serious

The source tarball contains Win32 binaries without source:

  ./src/alleg42.dll
  ./alleg42.dll

Ansgar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691074: gcc-doc: Depends on docs for wrong gcc version

2012-10-23 Thread Guo Yixuan
Hi,

On 10/23/2012 09:35 AM, Samuel Bronson wrote:
 On Oct 21, 2012, at 12:34 AM, Guo Yixuan wrote:
 The packages in unstable are updated to 4.7 (or 4.6 on some archs)[1],
 
 I actually knew this; I can't think why I didn't say so in the report.
 
 and waiting for release team's unblock grant.
 
 This part I didn't know. Thanks!
 
 Thanks, also, for picking up where I got frustrated; I was delighted
 when I noticed the updates in aptitude.  (Though I was a bit puzzled
 when I saw that I was listed as maintainer; at first I thought I must be
 looking at the wrong version of the package or something -- I would have
 only expected credit in the changelog and such. ;-)

Thank you. :) Then I'm taking over the maintenance, and the next upload
of gcc-4.[67]-doc will list me as maintainer, and you in uploaders.[1] I
plan to remove you from uploaders in wheezy+1 (jessie), is this ok?

[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/yixuan-guest/gcc-doc.git

 Sorry I've been hard to reach; I've been having trouble dealing with my
 email for the past year or so; gmail seems to eat all my RAM lately, and
 clients never seem to really grok gmail's IMAP.
 
 I tried to make it clear that I was happy for anyone to take this
 packaging over, but there wasn't any obvious central location in which
 to do that.

I think wnpp is the place. It's where you publish ITP, RFP and so on,
and you can simply retitle an ITP to an RFP to notify others.

Cheers,

Guo Yixuan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688847: marked as done (libav: multiple CVEs in ffmpeg/libav)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:03:00 +
with message-id e1tqyvw-0005kf...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#688847: fixed in libav 6:0.8.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688847,
regarding libav: multiple CVEs in ffmpeg/libav
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
688847: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688847
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: libav
Severity: grave
Justification: user security hole

Hi,

it seems that a huge pile of CVE were allocated for ffmpeg/libav and are
supposed to be fixed in 0.11:

CVE-2012-2772

CVE-2012-2774
CVE-2012-2775
CVE-2012-2776
CVE-2012-2777

CVE-2012-2779

CVE-2012-2782
CVE-2012-2783
CVE-2012-2784
CVE-2012-2785
CVE-2012-2786
CVE-2012-2787
CVE-2012-2788
CVE-2012-2789
CVE-2012-2790
CVE-2012-2791
CVE-2012-2792
CVE-2012-2793
CVE-2012-2794
CVE-2012-2795
CVE-2012-2796
CVE-2012-2797
CVE-2012-2798
CVE-2012-2799
CVE-2012-2800
CVE-2012-2801
CVE-2012-2802
CVE-2012-2803
CVE-2012-2804

As far as I can tell you're already aware of that, but so it's just a
tracking bug.

Regards,
-- 
Yves-Alexis

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-grsec-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libav
Source-Version: 6:0.8.4-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libav, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 688...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de (supplier of updated libav package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:57:08 +0200
Source: libav
Binary: libav-tools ffmpeg ffmpeg-dbg libav-dbg libav-extra-dbg ffmpeg-doc 
libav-doc libavutil51 libavcodec53 libavdevice53 libavformat53 libavfilter2 
libpostproc52 libswscale2 libavutil-dev libavcodec-dev libavdevice-dev 
libavformat-dev libavfilter-dev libpostproc-dev libswscale-dev 
libavutil-extra-51 libavcodec-extra-53 libavdevice-extra-53 libavfilter-extra-2 
libpostproc-extra-52 libavformat-extra-53 libswscale-extra-2
Architecture: all amd64 source
Version: 6:0.8.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Reinhard Tartler siret...@debian.org
Changed-By: Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de
Closes: 688847 690726
Description: 
 ffmpeg-dbg - Debug symbols for Libav related packages (transitional package)
 ffmpeg-doc - Documentation of the Libav API (transitional package)
 ffmpeg - Multimedia player, server, encoder and transcoder (transitional p
 libavcodec53 - Libav codec library
 libavcodec-dev - Development files for libavcodec
 libavcodec-extra-53 - Libav codec library (additional codecs)
 libav-dbg  - Debug symbols for Libav related packages
 libavdevice53 - Libav device handling library
 libavdevice-dev - Development files for libavdevice
 libavdevice-extra-53 - Libav device handling library (transitional package)
 libav-doc  - Documentation of the Libav API
 libav-extra-dbg - Debug symbols for Libav related packages (transitional 
package)
 libavfilter2 - Libav video filtering library
 libavfilter-dev - Development files for libavfilter
 libavfilter-extra-2 - Libav filter library (transitional package)
 libavformat53 - Libav file format library
 libavformat-dev - Development files for libavformat
 libavformat-extra-53 - Libav video postprocessing library (transitional 
package)
 libav-tools - Multimedia player, server, encoder and transcoder
 libavutil51 - Libav utility library
 libavutil-dev - Development files for libavutil
 libavutil-extra-51 - Libav utility library (transitional package)
 libpostproc52 - Libav video postprocessing library
 libpostproc-dev - Development files for libpostproc
 libpostproc-extra-52 - Libav video postprocessing library (transitional 
package)
 libswscale2 - Libav video scaling library
 libswscale-dev - Development files for libswscale
 

Processed: Re: ditto

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 severity -1 grave
Bug #576511 [drbd8-utils] drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions for 
various drbd fault conditions - may cause dataloss.
Severity set to 'grave' from 'wishlist'

-- 
576511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#576511: ditto

2012-10-23 Thread Josip Rodin

These defaults are really bad.

I had this happen to a machine running DRBD yesterday:

block drbd0: PingAck did not arrive in time.
block drbd0: peer( Secondary - Unknown ) conn( Connected - NetworkFailure ) 
pdsk( UpToDate - DUnknown )
block drbd0: asender terminated
block drbd0: Terminating drbd0_asender
block drbd0: helper command: /sbin/drbdadm pri-on-incon-degr minor-0
SysRq : Resetting

None of this was written in syslog, which it really should have been,
because DRBD on this machine does *not* operate on the root/var filesystems.

This is a state that can be detected, and if so, the scripts should instead
forcefully kill just DRBD, or whatever more limited component.

They really should not default to forcefully killing the entire machine
when they have no tangible proof that DRBD would be vital to it.

-- 
 2. That which causes joy or happiness.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#685810: marked as done (live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:41:33 +0200
with message-id 50864a2d.3060...@progress-technologies.net
and subject line Re: Bug#685810: live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - 
diversion conflict
has caused the Debian Bug report #685810,
regarding live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685810
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: live-tools
Version: 3.0.9-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'testing'.
It installed fine in 'testing', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.

From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Preparing to replace live-tools 3.0.3-1 (using 
.../live-tools_3.0.9-1_all.deb) ...
  dpkg-divert: error: `diversion of /usr/bin/uptime to 
/usr/bin/uptime.orig.procps by live-tools' clashes with `diversion of 
/usr/bin/uptime to /usr/bin/uptime.procps by live-tools'
  dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/live-tools_3.0.9-1_all.deb 
(--unpack):
   subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2


cheers,

Andreas


live-tools_3.0.9-1.log.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
On 10/11/2012 10:58 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
 upgrades from testing still (or again) do not work:

i don't think so.

---snip---
(sid_i386)root@debian:/home/user# wget -q
http://live.debian.net/archive/packages/live-tools/3.0.3-1/live-tools_3.0.3-1_all.deb
(sid_i386)root@server:/home/user# dpkg -i live-tools_3.0.3-1_all.deb
Selecting previously unselected package live-tools.
(Reading database ... 25678 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking live-tools (from live-tools_3.0.3-1_all.deb) ...
Setting up live-tools (3.0.3-1) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
(sid_i386)root@debian:/home/user# apt-get upgrade -y
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
  live-tools
1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 13.1 kB of archives.
After this operation, 47.1 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://ftp.ch.debian.org/debian/ sid/main live-tools all 3.0.12-1
[13.1 kB]
Fetched 13.1 kB in 0s (436 kB/s)
(Reading database ... 25695 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace live-tools 3.0.3-1 (using
.../live-tools_3.0.12-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement live-tools ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up live-tools (3.0.12-1) ...
(sid_i386)root@debian:/home/user#
---snap---

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/---End Message---


Bug#682648: status of the python-gnupg ftbfs

2012-10-23 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2012-10-22 at 23:36:59 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
 I believe that the patch provided by Dmitry Shachnev is unsuitable for
 wheezy, because it ships a new upstream version. The release team will
 be very hesitant to approve such a change. Is there any reason to to
 believe otherwise?

I'm also esitant to suggest a new upstream version, even if it only 
includes small changes.

The patch by Helmut Grohne is fine by me, because while it is hackish 
the hacks are contained in the test suite that is run at build.

Feel free to go on with the upload, as this gives me time to prepare 
a proper fix for version 0.3.1 after the release.

-- 
Elena ``of Valhalla''


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: found 688644 in 3.2.3-1

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 found 688644 3.2.3-1
Bug #688644 [audacious] audacious needs more strict audacious-plugins dependency
Marked as found in versions audacious/3.2.3-1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
688644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688644
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging 688644

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 688644 + pending
Bug #688644 [audacious] audacious needs more strict audacious-plugins dependency
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
688644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688644
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688644: marked as done (audacious needs more strict audacious-plugins dependency)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:02:33 +
with message-id e1tqand-00049n...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#688644: fixed in audacious 3.2.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #688644,
regarding audacious needs more strict audacious-plugins dependency
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
688644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688644
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: audacious
Version: 3.3.1-1
Severity: serious

--  snip  --


 *** ERROR: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/audacious/Input/xsf.so is not compatible 
with this version of Audacious.
 *** ERROR: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/audacious/Input/metronom.so is not 
compatible with this version of Audacious.
 *** ERROR: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/audacious/Input/console.so is not 
compatible with this version of Audacious.
 *** ERROR: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/audacious/Input/vtx.so is not compatible 
with this version of Audacious.
 *** ERROR: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/audacious/Input/modplug.so is not 
compatible with this version of Audacious.
 *** ERROR: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/audacious/Input/amidi-plug.so is not 
compatible with this version of Audacious.


--  snip  --


It works after upgrading audacious-plugins to 3.3.1-1.

audacious-plugins (= 3.2) is clearly not correct, I assume
(= 3.3 would be correct?

I would also guess that a dependency on audacious-plugins ( 3.4)
shouldbe added, since I assume the ABI breakage goes in both directions.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.5.3 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages audacious depends on:
ii  audacious-plugins3.2.3-1+b1
ii  dbus 1.6.0-1
ii  dbus-x11 1.6.0-1
ii  gtk2-engines-pixbuf  2.24.10-2
ii  libaudclient23.3.1-1
ii  libaudcore1  3.3.1-1
ii  libc62.13-35
ii  libdbus-1-3  1.6.2-2
ii  libdbus-glib-1-2 0.100-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0   2.26.1-1
ii  libglib2.0-0 2.33.12+really2.32.3-1
ii  libgtk-3-0   3.4.2-3
ii  libguess11.1-1

Versions of packages audacious recommends:
ii  unzip  6.0-7

audacious suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: audacious
Source-Version: 3.2.3-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
audacious, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 688...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org (supplier of updated audacious package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:37:35 +0100
Source: audacious
Binary: audacious audacious-dbg audacious-dev libaudclient2 libaudcore1
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 3.2.3-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers 
pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Alessio Treglia ales...@debian.org
Description: 
 audacious  - small and fast audio player which supports lots of formats
 audacious-dbg - audacious media player (debugging symbols)
 audacious-dev - audacious development files
 libaudclient2 - audacious dbus remote control library
 libaudcore1 - audacious core engine library
Closes: 688644
Changes: 
 audacious (3.2.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Tighten dependency between audacious and audacious-plugins to
 avoid ABI breakage. Thanks to Adrian Bunk for pointing out
 this. (Closes: #688644)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 2407f5d502b5b17a6c62a708014697f6f9c12cf2 2407 audacious_3.2.3-2.dsc
 84f12ab2e29d6e88f28600074509ccb00c1d0782 14890 audacious_3.2.3-2.debian.tar.gz
 74bb5ba0ff661bec523a6a225ee845692f2621cb 413910 audacious_3.2.3-2_amd64.deb
 78bb28e8dde6849f481afc31daafe199575dc9ed 649994 audacious-dbg_3.2.3-2_amd64.deb
 f43f72806dc0506b8e8a3926accadc9a7287e2e9 48724 

Bug#685810: marked as done (live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict)

2012-10-23 Thread Ben Armstrong
New steps to reproduce. In a clean wheezy chroot:

# apt-get install live-tools
Selecting previously unselected package live-tools.
(Reading database ... 9863 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking live-tools (from .../live-tools_3.0.3-1_all.deb) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up live-tools (3.0.3-1) ...
# dpkg-divert --list | grep live-tools
diversion of /usr/bin/uptime to /usr/bin/uptime.procps by live-tools
# ls -l /usr/bin/uptime*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   11 Jul  5 15:08 /usr/bin/uptime - live-uptime
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 9636 Jun 17 09:13 /usr/bin/uptime.procps
# echo deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian sid main  \
/etc/apt/sources.list
# apt-get update
...
# apt-get install -t sid live-tools
...
Preparing to replace live-tools 3.0.3-1 (using
.../live-tools_3.0.12-1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement live-tools ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Can not write log, openpty() failed (/dev/pts not mounted?)
Setting up live-tools (3.0.12-1) ...
# dpkg-divert --list | grep live-tools
diversion of /usr/sbin/update-initramfs to
/usr/sbin/update-initramfs.orig.initramfs-tools by live-tools
diversion of /usr/share/man/man8/update-initramfs.8.gz to
/usr/share/man/man8/update-initramfs.orig.initramfs-tools.8.gz by live-tools
diversion of /usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz to
/usr/share/man/man1/uptime.orig.procps.1.gz by live-tools
diversion of /usr/bin/uptime to /usr/bin/uptime.orig.procps by live-tools
# ls -l /usr/bin/uptime*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Sep 30 15:19 /usr/bin/uptime - /bin/live-uptime

Unfortunately, at this point uptime is broken because the original
diverted file is gone. Now if we purge live-tools and reinstall from wheezy:

# dpkg --purge live-tools
...
# dpkg-divert --list | grep live-tools
# ls -l /usr/bin/uptime*
ls: cannot access /usr/bin/uptime*: No such file or directory
# apt-get install -t wheezy live-tools
...
Selecting previously unselected package live-tools.
(Reading database ... 9863 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking live-tools (from .../live-tools_3.0.3-1_all.deb) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up live-tools (3.0.3-1) ...

And finally, upgrade it to sid, we get the reported error:

# apt-get install -t sid live-tools
...
Preparing to replace live-tools 3.0.3-1 (using
.../live-tools_3.0.12-1_all.deb) ...
dpkg-divert: error: `diversion of /usr/bin/uptime to
/usr/bin/uptime.orig.procps by live-tools' clashes with `diversion of
/usr/bin/uptime to /usr/bin/uptime.procps by live-tools'
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/live-tools_3.0.12-1_all.deb (--unpack):
 subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 2
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/live-tools_3.0.12-1_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

So yes, this bug needs to remain open, and also we need to solve the
damage being done to /usr/bin/uptime from the procps package if
live-tools 3.0.3-1 is upgraded to 3.0.12-1.

Ben


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: your mail

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reopen 685810
Bug #685810 {Done: Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net} 
[live-tools] live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked as fixed in versions live-tools/3.0.10-1.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
685810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685810
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#685351: marked as done (src:gnumed-client: Missing source code for *.js files)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:02:43 +
with message-id e1tqbjr-0002xz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#685351: fixed in gnumed-client 1.2.5+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685351,
regarding src:gnumed-client: Missing source code for *.js files
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685351
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: src:gnumed-client
Version: 1.1.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1

gnumed-doc installs
/usr/share/doc/gnumed/user-manual/rsrc/System/JSTreeContrib/jquery.jstree.js.
However, the file is present in the source package without source
code. Instructions on which tools were used to create it are also
missing. And the lack of copyright notices probably renders the
package non-distributable.

All or most of these issues seem to apply to other javascript files in
the package (like jquery.foswiki.js).
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: gnumed-client
Source-Version: 1.2.5+dfsg-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnumed-client, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 685...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org (supplier of updated gnumed-client package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:41:07 +0200
Source: gnumed-client
Binary: gnumed-client gnumed-client-de gnumed-common gnumed-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.5+dfsg-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Med Packaging Team 
debian-med-packag...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Andreas Tille ti...@debian.org
Description: 
 gnumed-client - medical practice management - Client
 gnumed-client-de - medical practice management - Client for German users
 gnumed-common - medical practice management - common files
 gnumed-doc - medical practice management - Documentation
Closes: 685351 690715
Changes: 
 gnumed-client (1.2.5+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version
   * Suggests: wakeonlan | etherwake | gwakeonlan, nvram-wakeup
 as suggested by upstream
   * debian/rules: get-orig-source target that removes JavaScript
 files without source that are not used anyway from source tarball
   * debian/copyright: Document what JavaSource files are removed from
 upstream tarball
   * debian/README.source: Document that some JavaScript files were removed
 and some were provided as source
   * debian/JS: Provide source code of remaining JavaScript files
 Closes: #685351
   * debian/dh_linktrees: deleted because dh_linktrees tries to work on
 files which are removed now - rather use dh_links instead
   * debian/watch: mangle version with '+dfsg' suffix
   * debian/control: Standards-Version: 3.9.4 (no changes needed)
   * debian/patches/10_fix_bashism.patch: Fix Bashism by simply declaring bash 
as
 interpreter
 Closes: #690715
Checksums-Sha1: 
 5fd05f72d1f91037452a8760edfb52e9cdb66c9f 1676 gnumed-client_1.2.5+dfsg-1.dsc
 a310a1bc81545fa88098e58d40c10ac01c6ea53e 5629932 
gnumed-client_1.2.5+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
 19e14ebc55ed87810b2a25e5e4565ae54b643020 33372 
gnumed-client_1.2.5+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
 c901493cc6d6bebc016eb4d8dbe7d5f9b5c1d5c3 1725628 
gnumed-client_1.2.5+dfsg-1_all.deb
 2f4256cf00e635530a4f097be2fea19252a7fb81 16070 
gnumed-client-de_1.2.5+dfsg-1_all.deb
 896af661ac8e26f80172e993b761eefd68a468e6 137842 
gnumed-common_1.2.5+dfsg-1_all.deb
 ef75422a49fc8a6fc9e18250f31ded0dfe93e621 1057078 
gnumed-doc_1.2.5+dfsg-1_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 d55e569432dd0e6c8d421352f48e4e4bfe164084c6a0844ab60628ae191a4f70 1676 
gnumed-client_1.2.5+dfsg-1.dsc
 3e878489d61bfa178a7853ce29bbc0524566746762c1c39345ead0f3d2a85c06 5629932 
gnumed-client_1.2.5+dfsg.orig.tar.xz
 c9d48f11bd2df0018b19bdbb5b36617401697bbd2abea08aad1ca7dbf27b73ad 33372 
gnumed-client_1.2.5+dfsg-1.debian.tar.gz
 af70260ac2a2f5ca1baa43f28aa69200c7a646fead68d325bd13e0372d71a906 1725628 
gnumed-client_1.2.5+dfsg-1_all.deb
 

Bug#691045: marked as done (expeyes: FTBFS: Build dependencies all listed in B-D-I)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:47:34 +
with message-id e1tqc1g-0001c8...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#691045: fixed in expeyes 3.0.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #691045,
regarding expeyes: FTBFS: Build dependencies all listed in B-D-I
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
691045: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691045
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: expeyes
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source

expeyes's control file lists all build dependencies in
Build-Depends-Indep, so (automated) builds in minimalistic environments
geared for building only architecture-dependent packages are failing:

 fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh clean --with python2
make: dh: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127

Please limit Build-Depends-Indep to anything necessary ONLY when
specifically building architecture-independent packages, and move
everything else to Build-Depends.  You can use

pbuilder --build --binary-arch

to test your Build-Depends for sufficiency.

Thanks!
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: expeyes
Source-Version: 3.0.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
expeyes, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 691...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Georges Khaznadar georg...@ofset.org (supplier of updated expeyes package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:13:03 +0200
Source: expeyes
Binary: expeyes libej0 libej-dev expeyes-clib expeyes-firmware-dev 
python-expeyes expeyes-doc-en expeyes-doc-fr expeyes-doc-common
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.0.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Georges Khaznadar georg...@ofset.org
Changed-By: Georges Khaznadar georg...@ofset.org
Description: 
 expeyes- hardware  software framework for developing science experiments
 expeyes-clib - hardware  software framework for developing science experiments
 expeyes-doc-common - Common files related to the User manual for expeyes 
library
 expeyes-doc-en - User manual for expeyes library, in English language
 expeyes-doc-fr - User manual for expeyes library, French translation
 expeyes-firmware-dev - hardware  software framework for developing science 
experiments
 libej-dev  - hardware  software framework for developing science experiments
 libej0 - hardware  software framework for developing science experiments
 python-expeyes - Python library for expeyes
Closes: 691045 691123
Changes: 
 expeyes (3.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * added verifications of the existence of /etc/ini.d/udev in postinst
 and postrm scripts. Closes: #691123
   * moved a few build-dependencies out of build-depends-indep.
 Closes: #691045
Checksums-Sha1: 
 b706e326f6ee42a623513b80fd079c361f151657 1555 expeyes_3.0.1-2.dsc
 3e66bdae7f8d10158cd6e51923fd3fdd18c76594 7996 expeyes_3.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
 c3d8d8dec5d90d814c37eabcfa032c730003178c 615884 expeyes_3.0.1-2_all.deb
 db88c3580979ae69b2225df93cb24467ea13712a 16028 libej0_3.0.1-2_amd64.deb
 e40178f98ac26ba66a6955e099aa29d679d86795 17040 libej-dev_3.0.1-2_amd64.deb
 594d5f79e90624c827283a0dc16a0543a2cdf619 12768 expeyes-clib_3.0.1-2_amd64.deb
 9d5a3fedf490af35202543946151a2f93fe93513 24838 
expeyes-firmware-dev_3.0.1-2_all.deb
 1ed7ce13ae5dec550329ae0dc9bfb673bacda8dd 32612 python-expeyes_3.0.1-2_all.deb
 c7932d17b1609bbe9a13c6c7c9a3f75720582cd9 5377654 expeyes-doc-en_3.0.1-2_all.deb
 afd1cc9e4578dafab71b772c5f7dc3d564975036 14039476 
expeyes-doc-fr_3.0.1-2_all.deb
 963ff9e938e0dfbb93ae43d0567147359ef74924 19834 
expeyes-doc-common_3.0.1-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 d7f79161de134c2d64b0da1c5adb3ad5979b718bb3262176421be740f99d794b 1555 
expeyes_3.0.1-2.dsc
 d242cb660796bb1e5de62a255b3671260ff40c041594dcaa8cfaf59987c0f26b 7996 
expeyes_3.0.1-2.debian.tar.gz
 6557145f16431b3614815a660e6e37a5d2fead84859a10031e4cd11fc6119b2c 615884 
expeyes_3.0.1-2_all.deb
 f010816b4976776b84d9babe0a27b457899c30e55e5a87f76d9c9271bff61891 16028 

Bug#691214: marked as done (lua-wsapi: wsapi.cgi won't run because it has DOS file endings)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:17:31 +
with message-id e1tqcuf-qh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#691214: fixed in lua-wsapi 1.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #691214,
regarding lua-wsapi: wsapi.cgi won't run because it has DOS file endings
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
691214: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691214
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: lua-wsapi
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

The /usr/bin/wsapi.cgi script is unrunnable as it has DOS line endings. When
it is run the Lua interpreter cannot be found, as it tries to look for a file
called lua5.1\r, which of course doesn't exist.

If the file is converted to Unix format (I used vim) it works fine.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lua-wsapi depends on:
ii  lua-coxpcall   1.13.0-6
ii  lua-filesystem 1.5.0+16+g84f1af5-1
ii  lua-rings  1.2.3-1
ii  lua5.1 5.1.5-4
ii  multiarch-support  2.13-35

lua-wsapi recommends no packages.

Versions of packages lua-wsapi suggests:
ii  lua-cgi  5.1.4+dfsg-2

-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: lua-wsapi
Source-Version: 1.5-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lua-wsapi, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 691...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org (supplier of updated lua-wsapi package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 12:58:38 +0200
Source: lua-wsapi
Binary: lua-wsapi lua-wsapi-fcgi lua-wsapi-fcgi-dev lua-wsapi-doc 
liblua5.1-wsapi1 liblua5.1-wsapi-fcgi-dev liblua5.1-wsapi-fcgi-1
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org
Changed-By: Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org
Description: 
 liblua5.1-wsapi-fcgi-1 - Transitional package for lua-wsapi-fcgi
 liblua5.1-wsapi-fcgi-dev - Transitional package for lua-wsapi-fcgi-dev
 liblua5.1-wsapi1 - Transitional package for lua-wsapi
 lua-wsapi  - Web server API abstraction layer for the Lua language
 lua-wsapi-doc - wsapi documentation files for the Lua language
 lua-wsapi-fcgi - Web server API fastcgi backend
 lua-wsapi-fcgi-dev - wsapi fastcgi development files for the Lua language
Closes: 691214
Changes: 
 lua-wsapi (1.5-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * wsapi.cgi lines ending converted to unix (Closes: #691214)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 3c3b5a3d5d1086239257f4e633115210bc70ef58 1598 lua-wsapi_1.5-3.dsc
 55e94fecd318760a02982977398f460354a3ad84 5132 lua-wsapi_1.5-3.debian.tar.gz
 bddd1527875cb02b1f8b8da9ce911b7bb59f91d7 19076 lua-wsapi_1.5-3_all.deb
 0c64f7936715f3d75ab2fbe48f7c1a1bf4c1b335 12630 lua-wsapi-fcgi_1.5-3_amd64.deb
 7ebb1d3340b139fe83ccebaadce7d8f66754b7f9 10164 
lua-wsapi-fcgi-dev_1.5-3_amd64.deb
 0aaabe3f24b65cbb4f965be55cd8d2ab523a28de 25138 lua-wsapi-doc_1.5-3_all.deb
 1a113d1ecf3fb8b3664d5d394ad7a121fc1f7daf 2958 liblua5.1-wsapi1_1.5-3_all.deb
 24a538d3373ea59a97b6eaa2f51b18730416ab19 2980 
liblua5.1-wsapi-fcgi-dev_1.5-3_all.deb
 9dd534dfbf3569236dcf67767cade2a4b60082e7 2976 
liblua5.1-wsapi-fcgi-1_1.5-3_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 20c7406416c7eb363ecab15ad56a79ec43521916e14fb5a67dcec37691dc4fda 1598 
lua-wsapi_1.5-3.dsc
 69a806abbd7c2823a0444f502e8178efed94086ec5450dd15ed694f17fd362ea 5132 
lua-wsapi_1.5-3.debian.tar.gz
 818ae82ad95296e415ed9c6c5a8f5f4fe3a9d8509e9bd9d6f9800a188ad98490 19076 
lua-wsapi_1.5-3_all.deb
 9e89b4b8ab660bfbe4f8769c42becb2c40cb8f23d4512f51adee0246ae175f03 12630 
lua-wsapi-fcgi_1.5-3_amd64.deb
 5da912d4508a69d55a2ff6c37805861e70a5d9a75e8f884d719ccc9291335c1c 10164 

Bug#691071: [Pkg-ime-devel] Bug#691071: RC fixed in unstable for #691071

2012-10-23 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi,

On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 06:30:05PM -0500, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
 I didn't follow previous bugs.
 However, have you noticed IBus 1.4.2?

No since pre1.5 version hide this from my rader :-) Thanks.

 It fixed some trivial bugs from 1.4.1:
 https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commits/1.4.y

Trivial bugs ... we can not do much since it is under freeze but serious
bugs, yes we can fix by cherrypicking patches and apply them to 1.4.1
tarball.

 Released tarball is here:
 http://code.google.com/p/ibus/downloads/list

This is not what we use.  git is my friend here.

Use:
Fix ibus-x11 SEGV in _process_key_event_done.
Fix the coordinate in languagebar when dual monitors are used.
Fix not to send preedit-changed signal when the preedit is not changed.

Skip:
Enable to fall back /etc/machine-id
Fix GtkBuilder bindtextdomain in ibus-setup.

Think:
Do not use deprecated glib function g_atexit().
Fix double-unref when looping over attachment.
Fix a typo.

==
Usually, document fix was OK under early freeze.  I do not know what
current freeze team thinks.  My impression is they are a bit stricker on
this aspect.

I think we need to file RC bugs for issues needing updates to Debian.
Then release team can approve.

Osamu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#685810: marked as done (live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict)

2012-10-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
retitle 685810 partial upgrade from 3.0.3 fails if no procps installed
severity 685810 normal
tag 685810 wontfix
thanks

On 10/23/2012 11:27 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
 New steps to reproduce. In a clean wheezy chroot:

'clean' as in 'no procps installed before live-tools'. the problem is a
faulty live-tools/3.0.3 postrm, and that one we can't fix in sid. it
would require fixing live-tools in wheezy first, which is pointless.

 So yes, this bug needs to remain open, and also we need to solve the
 damage being done to /usr/bin/uptime from the procps package if
 live-tools 3.0.3-1 is upgraded to 3.0.12-1.

there are no issues anymore except this minor one (upgrade without
procps installed first) remains. minor because a) it's partial upgrade
issue only, and b) procps is priority important, so nobody in real world
will hit this anyway.

-- 
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:  daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:   http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#685810: marked as done (live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 685810 partial upgrade from 3.0.3 fails if no procps installed
Bug #685810 [live-tools] live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion 
conflict
Changed Bug title to 'partial upgrade from 3.0.3 fails if no procps installed' 
from 'live-tools: fails to upgrade from testing - diversion conflict'
 severity 685810 normal
Bug #685810 [live-tools] partial upgrade from 3.0.3 fails if no procps installed
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
 tag 685810 wontfix
Bug #685810 [live-tools] partial upgrade from 3.0.3 fails if no procps installed
Added tag(s) wontfix.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
685810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685810
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691227: marked as done (xul-ext-affiliatefox-fsfe: incompatible with iceweasel as shipped in wheezy)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:27:28 + (UTC)
with message-id pine.bsm.4.64l.1210231226330.11...@herc.mirbsd.org
and subject line Re: Bug#691227: Acknowledgement (xul-ext-affiliatefox-fsfe: 
incompatible with iceweasel as shipped in wheezy)
has caused the Debian Bug report #691227,
regarding xul-ext-affiliatefox-fsfe: incompatible with iceweasel as shipped in 
wheezy
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
691227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: xul-ext-affiliatefox-fsfe
Version: 1.02-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi,

The xul-ext-affiliatefox-fsfe version as shipped in wheezy
does not work with iceweasel from wheezy. Please fix.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/mksh-static

xul-ext-affiliatefox-fsfe depends on no packages.

Versions of packages xul-ext-affiliatefox-fsfe recommends:
ii  iceweasel  10.0.9esr-1

xul-ext-affiliatefox-fsfe suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
attachment: scrnshot.png---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Debian Bug Tracking System dixit:

 unknown-pack...@qa.debian.org

Erm, nevermind. I am stupid. (This is not citable.)
I was of the conviction that this package was in
Debian, and it obviously isn’t, though I wonder why
I could install it on a non-work machine recently.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
22:20⎜asarch The crazy that persists in his craziness becomes a master
22:21⎜asarch And the distance between the craziness and geniality is
only measured by the success 18:35⎜asarch Psychotics are consistently
inconsistent. The essence of sanity is to be inconsistently inconsistent---End Message---


Bug#688944: marked as done (tiff: CVE-2012-4447)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 12:47:04 +
with message-id e1tqdsu-0004n9...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#688944: fixed in tiff 3.9.4-5+squeeze6
has caused the Debian Bug report #688944,
regarding tiff: CVE-2012-4447
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
688944: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688944
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: tiff
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole

Another buffer overflow, please see here for details:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860198

Cheers,
Moritz
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: tiff
Source-Version: 3.9.4-5+squeeze6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tiff, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 688...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org (supplier of updated tiff package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:54:07 -0400
Source: tiff
Binary: libtiff4 libtiffxx0c2 libtiff4-dev libtiff-tools libtiff-opengl 
libtiff-doc
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.9.4-5+squeeze6
Distribution: stable-security
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org
Changed-By: Jay Berkenbilt q...@debian.org
Description: 
 libtiff-doc - TIFF manipulation and conversion documentation
 libtiff-opengl - TIFF manipulation and conversion tools
 libtiff-tools - TIFF manipulation and conversion tools
 libtiff4   - Tag Image File Format (TIFF) library
 libtiff4-dev - Tag Image File Format library (TIFF), development files
 libtiffxx0c2 - Tag Image File Format (TIFF) library -- C++ interface
Closes: 688944
Changes: 
 tiff (3.9.4-5+squeeze6) stable-security; urgency=high
 .
   * Add fix for CVE-2012-4447, a buffer overrun.  (Closes: #688944)
   * CVE-2012-2088 was actually included in previous version but not listed
 in the change log.
Checksums-Sha1: 
 40d63cae7fce65cd2dc8d3bc7fe998d04fe17686 1872 tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze6.dsc
 826fd16f944029acf961200a8f39bad6b883e2cd 23461 
tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze6.debian.tar.gz
 a28d858df070aa2ba88bf14e32e4834f38dfc972 386210 
libtiff-doc_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_all.deb
 d0fb357ea0bed3cfe8070c0669e2562f912ae690 195236 
libtiff4_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
 9e6819492c905ac67b2f32dee00b067646d0b4e8 59156 
libtiffxx0c2_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
 32527cd6eec9c784796d58841c8b42202cdb8556 322238 
libtiff4-dev_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
 5ea4c865bea04e25fcaf66fb7ff1ca2d73bed481 302624 
libtiff-tools_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
 11b0ce5b09f8ec3874dc43c052c339ee5622c278 64584 
libtiff-opengl_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 98bfadeee93b550978a749770da018b5d609d9a28ccb14e3d483a73e33522e0c 1872 
tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze6.dsc
 518f411acb06f11e0ced8b35a146f6a5af13e75a08a9b76771e9bec28bb6717c 23461 
tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze6.debian.tar.gz
 7b05eb3e00fcc30be34c1d422def0631a25c5e8f770b12715eb2f50c315f66a2 386210 
libtiff-doc_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_all.deb
 75c55b8bca6be18d4d601ad527e4ab011d1a39cee7a73d721e28da90485b9279 195236 
libtiff4_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
 33f66d8c63cbcdbdf24b384609af64faeeb3c181d62cd89afbf8e4e0c90daa26 59156 
libtiffxx0c2_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
 5fc7b86a31e0f974d06e0ac8b5b7f0f214c15cdd2f4bdb4ed5322bf1fbd7e4d9 322238 
libtiff4-dev_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
 28085274adcd5763038a82bdd3f11255ac6b61c26c80aeddc59359adc77eb49e 302624 
libtiff-tools_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
 76fe7f3d38559b4cc4989745193dc3121db5200af2b6fc95a211e7c388c97266 64584 
libtiff-opengl_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
Files: 
 25abb92033975fd729cf217e25124fe8 1872 libs optional tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze6.dsc
 9a5c313688e6dedd4794e41075601c98 23461 libs optional 
tiff_3.9.4-5+squeeze6.debian.tar.gz
 76114ec8cd1be06d6ab086dbba683df0 386210 doc optional 
libtiff-doc_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_all.deb
 0ae16ee48239438fb09bad92f2426303 195236 libs optional 
libtiff4_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
 509849af062fbe2e3f71cc9d7c17a49b 59156 libs optional 
libtiffxx0c2_3.9.4-5+squeeze6_amd64.deb
 8693c0158ca318631f0d0e776589f3ce 322238 libdevel optional 

Bug#685662: marked as done (vfu: upstream copyright and license information is broken, parts without license to redistribute)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:17:38 +
with message-id e1tqemu-0004vl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#685662: fixed in vfu 4.10-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #685662,
regarding vfu: upstream copyright and license information is broken, parts 
without license to redistribute
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
685662: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: vfu
Version: 4.10-1
Severity: serious

The file vslib/README contains All files are under the GPL license.

In vslib/vsuti.cpp I read this :

  |  /* adler32.c -- compute the Adler-32 checksum of a data stream
  |   * Copyright (C) 1995-1996 Mark Adler
  |   * For conditions of distribution and use, see copyright notice in zlib.h
  |   */

I didn't find zlib.h in this package.  The file adler32.c in the package zlib
contains this :

  |  /* adler32.c -- compute the Adler-32 checksum of a data stream
  |   * Copyright (C) 1995-2011 Mark Adler
  |   * For conditions of distribution and use, see copyright notice in zlib.h
  |   */

The file zlib.h in the package zlib contains this :

  |  Copyright (C) 1995-2012 Jean-loup Gailly and Mark Adler
  |
  |  This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied
  |  warranty.  In no event will the authors be held liable for any damages
  |  arising from the use of this software.
  |
  |  Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose,
  |  including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it
  |  freely, subject to the following restrictions:
  |
  |  1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not
  | claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software
  | in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be
  | appreciated but is not required.
  |  2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be
  | misrepresented as being the original software.
  |  3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution.

So at this point we know that vslib/vsuti.cpp is not GPL, so vslib/README is
not accurate.

Having a look at the other files in vslib/ I found that the file
vslib/getopt2.cpp contains this :

  |  /*
  |   *  $Header: /cvs/vslib/getopt2.cpp,v 1.2 2001/10/28 13:53:02 cade Exp $
  |   *
  |   *  Copyright (C) 1994 Arno Schaefer
  |   *
  |   *  AU: Auswertung der Kommandozeile, der POSIX-Version von getopt ()
  |   *  nachempfunden.
  |   *
  |   *  PO: ANSI C
  |   */

I don't know where that file comes from, and I don't find any license.  We
cannot assume that it's GPL because we know that vslib/README is not accurate.
So we don't have a permission to redistribute vslib/getopt2.cpp.

Regards,

Bart Martens
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: vfu
Source-Version: 4.10-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
vfu, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 685...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org (supplier of updated vfu package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:47:29 +0200
Source: vfu
Binary: vfu
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 4.10-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: William Vera bi...@billy.com.mx
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
Description: 
 vfu- A versatile text-based filemanager
Closes: 685662
Changes: 
 vfu (4.10-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/copyright:
 - Add missing copyright information (Closes: #685662).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 3fdcbd97c4779a33eee67ea1f8bffb6068f4f65a 1671 vfu_4.10-1.1.dsc
 0a2b097f11a5f2c35b77490e840bec235f0e8bbe 6033 vfu_4.10-1.1.diff.gz
 8106c4eace98e6d87cf29bee8673ddf373fffd59 183102 vfu_4.10-1.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 138cbeec2c2b06f8f71c00f035db9726faf16c46828383817e2df756c2f98c97 1671 
vfu_4.10-1.1.dsc
 9c715296e9d3a73331d4e536975f12e9c064682c092527669447d733b6383377 6033 

Bug#688689: Ping (Was: ncbi-blast+: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/seedtop', which is also in package blast2 1:2.2.26.20120620-2)

2012-10-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Aaron and Olivier,

this is just a ping about this issue.  I guess we need some solution
soonish to get/keep ncbi-tools6 in Wheezy.  Please let me know if some
help might be needed.

Kind regards

   Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689951: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Emmanuel,

the package camitk received a release critical bug[1] which you possibly
did not noticed.  It would be great if you would read the history of the
bug log[1] and comment on the usage of Debian packaged tetgen which
would enable us to move the package to contrib rather than non-free.

Please note that the package will be removed from Debian if we do not
find a reasonable solution.

Kind regards

   Andreas.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/689951

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 01:56:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:12:35PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
  
  Actually all I did noticed is that tetgen is in non-free in debian already:
  http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tetgen.html
 
 It might make sense to verify whether a removal of tetgen from camitk
 and rather use the Debian packaged version is possible which would make
 camitk rather contrib than non-free.
  
  Christophe are you in touch with upstream ?
 
 Even if Charles mentioned that there are other non-free pieces in the license
 contacting upstream about a DFSG free license might not harm in anyway.
 
 Kind regards
 
Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690392: marked as done (libvoikko: incomplete debian/copyright)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:48:21 +
with message-id e1tqfmh-0004ya...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#690392: fixed in libvoikko 3.5-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #690392,
regarding libvoikko: incomplete debian/copyright
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690392: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690392
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Source: libvoikko
Version: 3.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5

src/utf8/ contains embedded copy of the UTF8-CPP library, which is 
copyrighted by Nemanja Trifunovic and licensed under the Boost Software 
License. This information is not included in the copyright file.


--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: libvoikko
Source-Version: 3.5-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libvoikko, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 690...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org (supplier of updated libvoikko package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:46:18 +0200
Source: libvoikko
Binary: libvoikko-dev libvoikko1 python-libvoikko
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.5-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Timo Jyrinki t...@debian.org
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
Description: 
 libvoikko-dev - Development files for libvoikko
 libvoikko1 - Library of Finnish language tools
 python-libvoikko - Python bindings for libvoikko
Closes: 690392
Changes: 
 libvoikko (3.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/copyright:
 - Add copyright information for UTF8-CPP library (Closes: #690392).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 cb44ab0a2fb648386f475add86f908f27ccbd5e6 1878 libvoikko_3.5-1.1.dsc
 1a59ed3bb1dd1d0c7cd23655b955732c44bcc0b2 6067 libvoikko_3.5-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 a915246e3ae797788b09f53281a4ffb1b5253c19 24246 python-libvoikko_3.5-1.1_all.deb
 722c668dda5150de85ba2cf11d656e698c72d0ed 227250 libvoikko-dev_3.5-1.1_amd64.deb
 d86bf4d18fd13add603d4e35f19db45fdbdbdea0 118284 libvoikko1_3.5-1.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 c8e3f13f0d0f26df0327797eff52261f562a3d3f90f44dd311e973c1dc878882 1878 
libvoikko_3.5-1.1.dsc
 70de419c2738e1df1a0aba64eaea87f5b7dc72af2e0e2817ca879165dbbc580c 6067 
libvoikko_3.5-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 c37d4c58c40c6da8b36d4debac6657756d1b914c701e60b457b176791c2a8cca 24246 
python-libvoikko_3.5-1.1_all.deb
 075766987de89d3231aa91f49402eb93d47751ac7087247c117e070c7356b6f6 227250 
libvoikko-dev_3.5-1.1_amd64.deb
 ca92e2487eedc1f1f9ddc749b705f0cd5e2dffbcb86be40d80353f2818aeaf27 118284 
libvoikko1_3.5-1.1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 2de1fd4c3f9c95f0255a1c870b1c8d46 1878 libs optional libvoikko_3.5-1.1.dsc
 b1280fbf57a9019fa29591e91e6486c4 6067 libs optional 
libvoikko_3.5-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 491fd2d4947a83f7697065cf20b63b6f 24246 python optional 
python-libvoikko_3.5-1.1_all.deb
 8d38ca83c520bbec9dd7b08859c22d54 227250 libdevel optional 
libvoikko-dev_3.5-1.1_amd64.deb
 68885871e69cb183843ec2e3320841cd 118284 libs optional 
libvoikko1_3.5-1.1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=SzkF
-END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---


Bug#688689: marked as done (ncbi-blast+: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/seedtop', which is also in package blast2 1:2.2.26.20120620-2)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:11:32 -0400
with message-id udld309ql3v@dr-wily.mit.edu
and subject line Re: Bug#688689: Ping (Was: ncbi-blast+: trying to overwrite 
'/usr/bin/seedtop', which is also in package blast2 1:2.2.26.20120620-2)
has caused the Debian Bug report #688689,
regarding ncbi-blast+: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/seedtop', which is also in 
package blast2 1:2.2.26.20120620-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
688689: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688689
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: ncbi-blast+
Version: 2.2.26-3
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I hope everything is in the subject. ;-)

Regards,
Patrice.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/24 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages ncbi-blast+ depends on:
ii  libbz2-1.0  1.0.6-4
ii  libc6   2.13-35
ii  libgcc1 1:4.7.2-2
ii  libpcre31:8.31-1
ii  libstdc++6  4.7.2-2
ii  ncbi-data   6.1.20120620-2
ii  perl5.14.2-13
ii  python  2.7.3-2
ii  zlib1g  1:1.2.7.dfsg-13

ncbi-blast+ recommends no packages.

ncbi-blast+ suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Package: blast2
Version: 1:2.2.26.20120620-2

Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:

 this is just a ping about this issue.  I guess we need some solution
 soonish to get/keep ncbi-tools6 in Wheezy.  Please let me know if some
 help might be needed.

Thanks for the reminder!  I'd originally cloned #688684 because I'd
thought setting up alternatives might be in order; however, when the
conflicting executables turned out to have incompatible usages, Olivier
proceeded to address the issue by simply renaming ncbi-blast+'s seedtop
to seedtop+, so blast2 can stay as is.  (I wouldn't bother formally
conflicting with the affected ncbi-blast+ version, which was never in
stable, or even testing IIRC.)

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu---End Message---


Processed: Re: Bug#688259: zangband: modifies shipped files during postinst

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 688259 patch
Bug #688259 [zangband] zangband: modifies shipped files during postinst, 
overwrites score file on upgrade
Added tag(s) patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
688259: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688259
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#688259: zangband: modifies shipped files during postinst

2012-10-23 Thread Markus Koschany
tags 688259 patch
thanks


Hi Drew and Andreas,

i had a look at the issue and prepared a patch for it. As far as i can
see changing the path for $static_vardir to
/usr/share/games/zangband/lib is sufficient to avoid the deletion of raw
files in /var/games/zangband/data. Running piuparts afterwards was
successful.  The wrong path in zangband.postinst
caused the for loop to touch only one file, *.raw.

I'm not sure whether the postinst script is still necessary nowadays. It
seems it's some kind of remnant from the past. It might be too late for
Wheezy but maybe we could drop it for Jessie completely. The make file in
/lib/data seems to take care of installing the raw files anyway.

Overwriting of the score file seems suspicious too, but i don't know
enough about zangband to assess the issue properly.

Drew, if you are still interested in having a co-maintainer, i can prepare a
new version for zangband and fix some lintian warnings. 

Regards,

Markus 
diff -u zangband-2.7.5pre1/debian/changelog zangband-2.7.5pre1/debian/changelog
--- zangband-2.7.5pre1/debian/changelog
+++ zangband-2.7.5pre1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+zangband (1:2.7.5pre1-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix wrong $static_datadir path in zangband.postinst file to avoid 
+deletion of *.raw files in /var/games/zangband/data. (Closes: #688259)
+
+ -- Markus Koschany a...@gambaru.de  Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:04:05 +0200
+
 zangband (1:2.7.5pre1-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * libgtk1 is no longer welcome in Debian.  zangband's gtk shell was
diff -u zangband-2.7.5pre1/debian/zangband.postinst 
zangband-2.7.5pre1/debian/zangband.postinst
--- zangband-2.7.5pre1/debian/zangband.postinst
+++ zangband-2.7.5pre1/debian/zangband.postinst
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 old_var_games=/var/lib/games
 old_var_datadir=/var/lib/games/zangband
 var_datadir=/var/games/zangband
-static_datadir=/usr/share/games/zangband
+static_datadir=/usr/share/games/zangband/lib
 
 notmovingoldfiles=WARNING: $old_var_datadir is a symlink.
 Not moving files to new location. Please fix manually.
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
 regenerated automatically in their new location.)
 
 movingoldfiles=WARNING: Old zangband data files exist.
-Moving save, bones, and score files to $new_var_datadir.
+Moving save, bones, and score files to $var_datadir.
 Existing files will be backed up before overwriting.
 
 fixperms () {


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690371: marked as done (megaglest: incorrect information in copyright file)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:17:43 +
with message-id e1tqgeh-0004e3...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#690371: fixed in megaglest 3.6.0.3-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #690371,
regarding megaglest: incorrect information in copyright file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690371: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690371
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Source: megaglest
Version: 3.6.0.3-1.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5

The copyright file reads:
| Files: source/shared_lib/sources/util/utf8/* 
source/shared_lib/include/util/utf8/*
| Copyright: Copyright 1997-2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc

However, source/shared_lib/sources/util/utf8/* don't exist at all, and 
source/shared_lib/include/util/utf8/* carry a different copyright 
notice:


// Copyright 2006 Nemanja Trifunovic

--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: megaglest
Source-Version: 3.6.0.3-1.2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
megaglest, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 690...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org (supplier of updated megaglest package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 16:20:21 +0200
Source: megaglest
Binary: glest megaglest megaglest-dbg
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 3.6.0.3-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Games Team pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org
Description: 
 glest  - Dummy transition package for megaglest
 megaglest  - 3D multi-player real time strategy game
 megaglest-dbg - debug files for MegaGlest
Closes: 690371
Changes: 
 megaglest (3.6.0.3-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * debian/copyright:
 - Adjust copyright information for UTF8-CPP library (Closes: #690371).
Checksums-Sha1: 
 97e176610eabaa8fe52c1dd896f9899fd61bab45 2480 megaglest_3.6.0.3-1.2.dsc
 d308cadfbdd9520f45ccf2cbdf084fa05fbaf8b7 9831 
megaglest_3.6.0.3-1.2.debian.tar.gz
 4e63319a8e72a18e78aae86032ae36a1e6efdc51 19946 glest_3.6.0.3-1.2_all.deb
 14c3639de36a33aa16f2f62ad1bc1af507315191 3236068 
megaglest_3.6.0.3-1.2_amd64.deb
 25bbdb54cb7bd437f87695954422389cc94a589c 24716614 
megaglest-dbg_3.6.0.3-1.2_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 8727349bfa81ef8958af229de8d116b970467797a92596ecc5e1401b9a54592d 2480 
megaglest_3.6.0.3-1.2.dsc
 a9a7ea26938c2201bb6e08addf87d74e947040f951f6b1118890d152b52802ae 9831 
megaglest_3.6.0.3-1.2.debian.tar.gz
 839567edac787e0203f8e4daddc8f34bf3c2f4f2ee6c43231a7b7deb904fba78 19946 
glest_3.6.0.3-1.2_all.deb
 1406823306784cefcd0253c176e30f80412a8abde45c79d600ba60a05040313e 3236068 
megaglest_3.6.0.3-1.2_amd64.deb
 6abcab6d5ced139bf02a1e656af8a3107ba2d9b2e823155b8d0889742dabacf1 24716614 
megaglest-dbg_3.6.0.3-1.2_amd64.deb
Files: 
 9a9791071f44dea63d1f91c37959f9bd 2480 games extra megaglest_3.6.0.3-1.2.dsc
 9223dc2f7ba6dedbbcc862ee6bfb4011 9831 games extra 
megaglest_3.6.0.3-1.2.debian.tar.gz
 8a816b020558077bf94434ef9ef37d7c 19946 oldlibs extra glest_3.6.0.3-1.2_all.deb
 907bb9f0c93c28f4f1f920b17809af72 3236068 games extra 
megaglest_3.6.0.3-1.2_amd64.deb
 d2071d39bb7946442e6835b14d3cf4bc 24716614 debug extra 
megaglest-dbg_3.6.0.3-1.2_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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Bug#689951: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-23 Thread Emmanuel Promayon

Hello Andreas,

First sorry for not commenting on the bug, I have to find a better way 
to interact with the process, and thank you for all the comments.


The use of tetgen is not a fundamental feature of CamiTK (and anyway 
less important than being in contrib).
Therefore the code depending on it can be either removed completely from 
the CamiTK package (this is an additional plugin). And the use of the 
debian packaged version is an even better solution, as you suggested. In 
this case will CamiTK remain in contrib?


What is my deadline to do this without offending anyone?

Kind regards,


On 23/10/12 16:32, Andreas Tille wrote:

Hi Emmanuel,

the package camitk received a release critical bug[1] which you possibly
did not noticed.  It would be great if you would read the history of the
bug log[1] and comment on the usage of Debian packaged tetgen which
would enable us to move the package to contrib rather than non-free.

Please note that the package will be removed from Debian if we do not
find a reasonable solution.

Kind regards

Andreas.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/689951

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 01:56:43PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:12:35PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:


Actually all I did noticed is that tetgen is in non-free in debian already:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tetgen.html


It might make sense to verify whether a removal of tetgen from camitk
and rather use the Debian packaged version is possible which would make
camitk rather contrib than non-free.


Christophe are you in touch with upstream ?


Even if Charles mentioned that there are other non-free pieces in the license
contacting upstream about a DFSG free license might not harm in anyway.

Kind regards

Andreas.




--
Emmanuel Promayon
UJF-Grenoble 1, CNRS, TIMC-IMAG UMR 5525 (équipe GMCAO)
Institut de l'Ingénierie de l'Information de Santé
Faculté de Médecine - 38706 La Tronche cedex - France
Tel. +33/0 456 52 00 03 - Fax. +33/0 456 52 00 55 - B7


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#576511: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions

2012-10-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
control: severity -1 important

 These defaults are really bad.

 I had this happen to a machine running DRBD yesterday:

 block drbd0: PingAck did not arrive in time.
 block drbd0: peer( Secondary - Unknown ) conn( Connected - NetworkFailure ) 
 pdsk( UpToDate - DUnknown )
 block drbd0: asender terminated
 block drbd0: Terminating drbd0_asender
 block drbd0: helper command: /sbin/drbdadm pri-on-incon-degr minor-0
 SysRq : Resetting

I understand your concern, but you should not override the
maintainer's opinion on bug severities.  These are upstream defaults I
believe, so the settings are really their call, and to get them
changed you'll need to discuss the matter with them.

Best wishes,
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: re: drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 severity -1 important
Bug #576511 [drbd8-utils] drbd8-utils: Ships with violent default actions for 
various drbd fault conditions - may cause dataloss.
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'

-- 
576511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576511
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#682648: Rescheduled

2012-10-23 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
Rescheduled to 0-day.

Cheers,
  Paul

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org
: :'  : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'`  4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#682648: marked as done (python-gnupg: FTBFS: test hangs for 60 mins)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:17:48 +
with message-id e1tqhaq-00027b...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#682648: fixed in python-gnupg 0.3.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #682648,
regarding python-gnupg: FTBFS: test hangs for 60 mins
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
682648: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682648
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Source: python-gnupg
Version: 0.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120724 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.

Relevant part:
 make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
 set -ex; for py in 2.7 2.6; do \
   PYTHONPATH=/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/lib.*-$py  python$py 
 test_gnupg.py ;\
   done
 + PYTHONPATH=/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/lib.*-2.7 python2.7 test_gnupg.py
 test_deletion (__main__.GPGTestCase)
 Test that key deletion works ... ok
 test_encryption_and_decryption (__main__.GPGTestCase)
 Test that encryption and decryption works ... ok
 test_environment (__main__.GPGTestCase)
 Test the environment by ensuring that setup worked ... ok
 test_file_encryption_and_decryption (__main__.GPGTestCase)
 Test that encryption/decryption to/from file works ... ok
 test_import_and_export (__main__.GPGTestCase)
 Test that key import and export works ... ok
 test_import_only (__main__.GPGTestCase)
 Test that key import works ... ok
 test_list_keys_after_generation (__main__.GPGTestCase)
 Test that after key generation, the generated key is available ... ok
 test_list_keys_initial (__main__.GPGTestCase)
 Test that initially there are no keys ... ok
 test_nogpg (__main__.GPGTestCase)
 Test that absence of gpg is handled correctly ... ok
 test_signature_verification (__main__.GPGTestCase)
 Test that signing and verification works ... make: *** wait: No child 
 processes.  Stop.
 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
 make: *** wait: No child processes.  Stop.
 make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_test] Terminated
 E: Caught signal 'Terminated': terminating immediately
 Build killed with signal TERM after 60 minutes of inactivity
 
 Build finished at 20120724-0327

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/07/24/python-gnupg_0.3.0-1_unstable.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: python-gnupg
Source-Version: 0.3.0-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
python-gnupg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 682...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de (supplier of updated python-gnupg package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 23:30:19 +0200
Source: python-gnupg
Binary: python-gnupg python3-gnupg
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.3.0-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Elena Grandi elena.valha...@gmail.com
Changed-By: Helmut Grohne hel...@subdivi.de
Description: 
 python-gnupg - Python wrapper for the Gnu Privacy Guard (Python 2.x)
 python3-gnupg - Python wrapper for the Gnu Privacy Guard (Python 3.x)
Closes: 682648
Changes: 
 python-gnupg (0.3.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Work around test suite hangs by adding --quick-random when generating
 keys. Closes: #682648
Checksums-Sha1: 
 6e2ec3a3a317910b3d3aa96d5943d29177eef718 2109 python-gnupg_0.3.0-1.1.dsc
 a867632138734df83e1ecf93b853605c37c5c805 16647 python-gnupg_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 0a260321a4d0afd1fff92b5d705ef62a0a60f281 4255 
python-gnupg_0.3.0-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 

Bug#690864: marked as done (greenwich: missing dependency on liblocale-gettext-perl)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:17:39 +
with message-id e1tqhah-00022s...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#690864: fixed in greenwich 0.8.2-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #690864,
regarding greenwich: missing dependency on liblocale-gettext-perl
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
690864: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690864
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Package: greenwich
Version: 0.8.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5

greenwich doesn't start if liblocale-gettext-perl is not installed:

$ greenwich 
Can't locate Locale/gettext.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) at /usr/bin/greenwich line 29.

BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/greenwich line 29.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.5-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages greenwich depends on:
ii  libgnome2-gconf-perl1.044-4
ii  libgnome2-perl  1.042-2+b2
ii  libgtk2-gladexml-perl   1.007-1+b2
ii  libgtk2-perl2:1.244-1
ii  perl5.14.2-14
ii  perl-modules [liblocale-maketext-perl]  5.14.2-14
ii  whois   5.0.20

--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: greenwich
Source-Version: 0.8.2-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
greenwich, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 690...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Paleino da...@debian.org (supplier of updated greenwich package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:59:38 +0200
Source: greenwich
Binary: greenwich
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.8.2-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Paleino da...@debian.org
Changed-By: David Paleino da...@debian.org
Description: 
 greenwich  - graphical whois client for GNOME
Closes: 690864 690867
Changes: 
 greenwich (0.8.2-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Add dependency on liblocale-gettext-perl (Closes: #690864)
   * Fix Polish translation encoding, thanks to Jakub Wilk
 (Closes: #690867)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 087f7c772aef9f889e015c1e0617b452e98437f4 1241 greenwich_0.8.2-6.dsc
 385aa70459877c6a15bb1f93591dd31a5ccad28e 9237 greenwich_0.8.2-6.debian.tar.gz
 b6deddded4547ea90ddf14162828ed5fdb517dd0 34634 greenwich_0.8.2-6_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 ddf991aceff586f100776bebfe5393fdf4fab252e0292920a8e799e1cb023743 1241 
greenwich_0.8.2-6.dsc
 1754fd472c7439e3261d1ee45ec9582d5bb03f602786b92ff6f560d507c78de9 9237 
greenwich_0.8.2-6.debian.tar.gz
 2ac800f415faf13bacd520dee2bd745984e8b4eac6f6aafc77485fe721de250c 34634 
greenwich_0.8.2-6_all.deb
Files: 
 54d328562649bb0a90fb4131620c30dd 1241 gnome optional greenwich_0.8.2-6.dsc
 d14e9176283b94e9c27c9b9cb9047407 9237 gnome optional 
greenwich_0.8.2-6.debian.tar.gz
 fff22b60326afc391587ee5dc2439732 34634 gnome optional greenwich_0.8.2-6_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCGwJUACgkQ5qqQFxOSsXQbQACeP8lbCHmf5mTdwTU0HHcrGZvq
vOUAn1NNX1VSmxE2rg8tPI8ZZLZpoK6Q
=FxKd
-END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---


Bug#636158: maradns: Debian default config is not robust to user change + upgrade

2012-10-23 Thread gregor herrmann
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:59:17 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:

 Find attached a quick patch which seems to work (as in: create
 /etc/maradns/mararc on a new install and leave it alone for
 upgrades). Of course the template could be put somewhere else, and
 the nested conditions in the postinst written differently.

Hi Nicholas,

I noticed that maradns is on the Release Team's removal candidate
list:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/10/msg00373.html

Are you going to upload a fix before Friday (or to contact them) or
can I help in any way?

Cheers,
gregor
 
-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Janis Joplin: Cry Baby


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#643703: marked as done (asterisk: SHA-1 code is doesn't allow modification)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:47:27 +
with message-id e1tqhdx-vw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#643703: fixed in asterisk-flite 2.1-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #643703,
regarding asterisk: SHA-1 code is doesn't allow modification
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
643703: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=643703
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: asterisk
Version: 1:1.6.2.9-2+squeeze3
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 2.1.3
User: gnewsense-...@nongnu.org
Usertags: gnewsense libreplanet

File main/sha1.c has this license notice:

 *  This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
 *  others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
 *  or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
 *  and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
 *  kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
 *  included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
 *  document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
 *  the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
 *  Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
 *  developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
 *  copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
 *  followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
 *  English.

To my understanding that means you can extend, but not modify the text/
code in this file. This violates DFSG.

It looks like this code was copied straight from RFC 3174. I found a
discussion [2] on debian-legal from a few years back that says that
RFC texts are non-free (except for the first 1000 or so). A summary
about copyright on RFC Editor [3] says that derivative works are
allowed, but doesn't go into detail.

[1] http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3174.txt
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/04/msg00223.html
[3] http://www.rfc-editor.org/copyright.17Feb04.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=nl_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: asterisk-flite
Source-Version: 2.1-1.1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
asterisk-flite, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 643...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Geert Stappers stapp...@debian.org (supplier of updated asterisk-flite 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 15:21:10 +0200
Source: asterisk-flite
Binary: asterisk-flite
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 2.1-1.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk
Changed-By: Geert Stappers stapp...@debian.org
Description: 
 asterisk-flite - flite module for Asterisk
Closes: 643703
Changes: 
 asterisk-flite (2.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Non-maintainer upload.
   * Build-depend on asterisk. Closes: bug#643703
Checksums-Sha1: 
 7cb01f965bc7a32a0ccf49ccd4bca86249dbb4b7 1301 asterisk-flite_2.1-1.1.dsc
 042e81952665c7342b62183906769335adaa4f4a 3838 
asterisk-flite_2.1-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 d0506da79116450eefb5c4b53afd65c11dda0e67 13452 asterisk-flite_2.1-1.1_amd64.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 f42db4ea6c6f74a415c866d40c1fd72518988c35663274c98cfe6d909d2f73b3 1301 
asterisk-flite_2.1-1.1.dsc
 4b5bc3cd6a0ada319319a2e6bfdb3c45d8ac0bac1cbd14b5ce7d21771f0ad139 3838 
asterisk-flite_2.1-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 0e18ef0013190df7ef951cf41b09bdc89b56aff68feb7fece6d0d77ad069069c 13452 
asterisk-flite_2.1-1.1_amd64.deb
Files: 
 93c3d8a5b5a41922d46200f8c3d45dd6 1301 comm extra asterisk-flite_2.1-1.1.dsc
 92c1cd3499e534620d5f7402d3e3f48e 3838 comm extra 
asterisk-flite_2.1-1.1.debian.tar.gz
 f08fdee25d6889ab9fa42c13f8314870 13452 comm extra 
asterisk-flite_2.1-1.1_amd64.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Bug#689946: Bug#690947: lat: Missing dependency on libmono-corlib2.0-cil

2012-10-23 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: forcemerge 689946 690947

On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:37:47 +0200, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:

 $ lat
 The assembly mscorlib.dll was not found or could not be loaded.
 It should have been installed in the `/usr/lib/mono/2.0/mscorlib.dll' 
 directory.

This seems to be a side effect of #689946.

When I change /usr/bin/lat to:

#v+
#!/bin/sh
/usr/bin/mono  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/lat.exe $@
#v-

... the error about /usr/lib/mono/2.0/mscorlib.dll goes away, and
strace shows that it accesses (only) /usr/lib/mono/4.0/mscorlib.dll.
 
(No idea if it works later, since I tried this in a chroot without X
initially. Under xvfb it would also need DBUS which also not running
in the chroot.)

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Tracy Chapman: Give Me One Reason


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#690947: lat: Missing dependency on libmono-corlib2.0-cil

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 forcemerge 689946 690947
Bug #689946 [lat] lat: Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such 
file or directory.
Bug #690947 [lat] lat: Missing dependency on libmono-corlib2.0-cil
Severity set to 'grave' from 'serious'
Merged 689946 690947

-- 
689946: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689946
690947: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690947
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#690947: lat: Missing dependency on libmono-corlib2.0-cil

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 forcemerge 689946 690947
Bug #689946 [lat] lat: Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such 
file or directory.
Bug #690947 [lat] lat: Missing dependency on libmono-corlib2.0-cil
Bug #690947 [lat] lat: Missing dependency on libmono-corlib2.0-cil
Merged 689946 690947

-- 
689946: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689946
690947: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690947
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689038: camping: Does not support HTTP POST

2012-10-23 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi Paul

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:12:51PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
 Package: camping
 Version: 2.1.498-3
 Severity: grave
 Tags: patch upstream
 Justification: renders package unusable
 
 Hi,
 
 Currently, it is not possible in Debian to use the Camping framework to
 write/create an application that supports HTTP POST next to GET nor to
 use/run Camping webapps that use POST.
 This only holds when using Camping server and not other deployment methods. 
 However, it is obviously a must for it to work during development.
 
 The problem is caused by the fact that the Rack::File middleware, used for
 serving static files, is chained before the app and this middleware
 logically doesn't support POST and throws a HTTP 405 error which is
 subsequently not handled.
 
 The patch attached ensures that HTTP 405 is ignored and the POST request is
 propagated to the Camping app.

Niels Thykier announced[1] that this package is a candidate for
removal. I'm not a user of this package, so can not judge if the patch
is sufficient, but it is comitted as is already some time upstream.

Do you plan to upload the package applying the patch? Please note that
this should happen before of the 26th october.

 [1]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/10/msg00817.html

Regards,
Salvatore


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#690982: Acknowledgement (Printouts are incomplete)

2012-10-23 Thread Michael Biebl
On 20.10.2012 11:48, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
 Hi Michael, and thanks for your very detailed bugreport, it's greatly 
 appreciated.
 
 Without much insight into your specific problem, would the (quite invasive) 
 attached patch solve your problem ? It's the backport of latest upstream 
 CUPS libusb backend over 1.5.3-2.3 .
 
 Le samedi, 20 octobre 2012 01.03:40, Michael Biebl a écrit :
 On a different note: I don't quite understand, by you modprobe the usblp
 module on upgrades, but not in the init script

 If the module is needed, shouldn't you also load it when you reboot?
 If it's not needed, why the modprobe?
 
 Well... As far as I understand it (and I'm a young cups bird), the module 
 should either be loaded by default or on-demand. It has been blacklisted for 
 a 
 while so the postinst ensures that a non-rebooted system upgraded through 
 these versions would get a loaded module. I think (but might be wrong), that 
 the module would otherwise be loaded.

You're right. It seems after a reboot the module was loaded
automatically / on-demand.

 
 Looking forward for the results of the attached patch!

It seems the patch does the trick for me. I get complete printouts
again. Thanks!

For completeness sake, the relevant lsusb output is
Bus 003 Device 008: ID 04a9:1725 Canon, Inc. MP610 ser


Cheers,
Michael


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Processed: severity of 679717 is serious

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 679717 serious
Bug #679717 [accessodf] accessodf: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679717: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679717
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#690370: Upload rejected

2012-10-23 Thread Luca Falavigna
tags 690370 - pending
thanks


The upload has been rejected because of the following lintian error:
embedded-library usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/fife/_fife.so: glee


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Upload rejected

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 690370 - pending
Bug #690370 [src:fife] fife: incomplete copyright file
Removed tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
690370: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690370
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#619065: vblade-persist: vblade-persist puts symlinks in /dev/etherd

2012-10-23 Thread Gianluca Ciccarelli
Hello Hilko,

It seems that this bug is very old, and also that the activity upstream
is low. Do you confirm the bug is still there, or do you think it can be
closed or otherwise be dealt with?

Thank you,

-- 
Gianluca Ciccarelli
http://disi.unitn.it/~ciccarelli
GPG key ID: 39BBDB6C



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#689946: lat: Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or directory.

2012-10-23 Thread gregor herrmann
Control: tag -1 + patch

On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:10:39 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:

  $ lat
  Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or directory.
 
  Because /usr/bin/lat specifies /usr/lib/lat/lat.exe in that file but
  lat package has /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/lat.exe.
 
 
 $ cat lat/lat.in 
 #!/bin/sh
 @MONO@ @MONO_FLAGS@ @prefix@/lib/lat/lat.exe $@
 
 /usr/bin/lat
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/gnome-keyring-glue.dll
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/gnome-keyring-glue.dll.config
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/lat.exe
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/plugins/ActiveDirectoryCoreViews.dll
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/plugins/JpegAttributeViewer.dll
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/plugins/PasswordAttributeViewer.dll
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/plugins/PosixCoreViews.dll
 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/lat-plugins.pc

And:

 Architecture: all

And:

E: lat: triplet-dir-and-architecture-mismatch usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ is for 
amd64
N: 
N:This package contains a directory under /lib or /usr/lib which doesn't
N:match the proper triplet for the binary package's architecture. This is
N:very likely to be a mistake when indicating the underlying build system
N:where the files should be installed.
N:
N:Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 9.1.1 (File System Structure) for
N:details.
N:
N:Severity: serious, Certainty: possible
N:
N:Check: files, Type: binary, udeb


This can be fixed by passing --libdir=/usr/lib to dh_auto_configure
in debian/rules


But we also have:

debian/rules:
include /usr/share/cli-common/cli.make
--
/usr/share/cli-common/cli.make:4: WARNING: the use of 
/usr/share/cli-common/cli.make is deprecated! Use dh $@ --with=cli instead.
and tons of:
dh_FOO:
Unknown option: with

But dh $@ --with=cli alone doesn't fix the path issues.


I'm attaching my preliminary patch, but since I have no idea about
mono and not alot about multiarch, I leave this at this point.

Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer  -  http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT  SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Leonard Cohen: Love Itself
diff -Nru lat-1.2.3/debian/changelog lat-1.2.3/debian/changelog
--- lat-1.2.3/debian/changelog	2012-05-27 07:57:16.0 +0200
+++ lat-1.2.3/debian/changelog	2012-10-23 19:49:41.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+lat (1.2.3-9.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or
+directory.:
+- pass --libdir=/usr/lib to dh_auto_configure in debian/rules
+- use dh $@ --with=cli in debian/rules.
+(Closes: #689946)
+
+ -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org  Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:21:49 +0200
+
 lat (1.2.3-9) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/control: Update homepage. (Closes: #656843)
diff -Nru lat-1.2.3/debian/rules lat-1.2.3/debian/rules
--- lat-1.2.3/debian/rules	2012-05-27 07:57:16.0 +0200
+++ lat-1.2.3/debian/rules	2012-10-23 19:48:49.0 +0200
@@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
 #!/usr/bin/make -f
 
-include /usr/share/cli-common/cli.make
-
 %:
-	dh $@
+	dh $@ --with=cli
 
 override_dh_auto_configure:
-	dh_auto_configure -- MCS=/usr/bin/mono-csc
+	dh_auto_configure -- MCS=/usr/bin/mono-csc --libdir=/usr/lib
 
 override_dh_auto_install:
 	dh_auto_install


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#689946: lat: Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or directory.

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tag -1 + patch
Bug #689946 [lat] lat: Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such 
file or directory.
Bug #690947 [lat] lat: Missing dependency on libmono-corlib2.0-cil
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
689946: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689946
690947: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690947
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#666018: marked as done (grub-efi-amd64: fails to boot linux with initrd)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:58:44 -0400
with message-id 
CANTw=mpkttc9v8ua8dqg54ie7lbsvnydk9crdvxroqepopa...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line re: grub-efi-amd64: fails to boot linux with initrd
has caused the Debian Bug report #666018,
regarding grub-efi-amd64: fails to boot linux with initrd
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
666018: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=666018
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: grub-efi-amd64
Version: 1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1
Severity: critical
Tags: squeeze
Justification: breaks the whole system

Hi,

this my first bug report, so I'd appreciate any hints, how I can do
better. BTW sorry for my english.

I installed squeeze on a computer with an uefi firmware. An ArchLinux
was already installed on this computer, so I installed squeeze on a
separate partition. For booting I used the already installed grub2 of
ArchLinux, which worked fine also for squeeze.
The time I was satisfied with my setup of squeeze, I wanted to get
rid of ArchLinux. This included installing the squeeze package
grub-efi-amd64.
But booting with grub 1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1 failed with a kernel
panic, something like:
not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)

I found out, that this problem is somehow known:
http://william.shallum.net/random-notes/windows-7-linux-uefi-dual-boot

Install grub-efi-amd64 from wheezy, not squeeze. Squeeze
 version doesn't properly pass initrd to the kernel,
 resulting in the error Kernel Panic ...

But I couldn't find any bug report on this topic, so here it is.

Because I have no clue what the problem is, I worked around.

I somehow managed, to backport the grub2-source-package of wheezy
(1.99-17 at the time of this writing), and build my own grub2.
(My version is called 1.99-17hinki, as you can see in the system 
information below.)
This one works fine. For testing purpose I installed it in parallel
to the non-working squeeze-grub-efi-amd64. So I could run some tests,
if I knew which.

In my current setup, the squeeze-grub and the wheezy-backported-grub
are using the same configs.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (700, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages grub-efi-amd64 depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]   1.5.36.1 Debian configuration management sy
ii  grub-common 1.99-17hinki GRand Unified Bootloader (common f
ii  grub-efi-amd64-bin  1.99-17hinki GRand Unified Bootloader, version 
ii  grub2-common1.99-17hinki GRand Unified Bootloader (common f
ii  ucf 3.0025+nmu1  Update Configuration File: preserv

grub-efi-amd64 recommends no packages.

grub-efi-amd64 suggests no packages.

-- debconf information excluded


---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
version: 1.99-1

Fixed upstream, and doesn't affect wheezy.  Still affects squeeze, but
it's unlikely to be backported there unless someone has really strong
interest.

Best wishes,
Mike---End Message---


Processed: re: grub-pc: grub-probe reports wrong UUID for md raid1 device

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 found 682993 1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1
Bug #682993 [grub-pc] grub-pc: grub-probe reports wrong UUID for md raid1 device
Marked as found in versions grub2/1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
682993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682993
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: your mail

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 notfound 682993 1.99-22.1
Bug #682993 [grub-pc] grub-pc: grub-probe reports wrong UUID for md raid1 device
No longer marked as found in versions grub2/1.99-22.1.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
682993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682993
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#682993: marked as done (grub-pc: grub-probe reports wrong UUID for md raid1 device)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:08:19 -0400
with message-id 
CANTw=mmfmxaxdxmjxe+kgyo73ny8gdf2tx0f3r7kjqmvntj...@mail.gmail.com
and subject line re: grub-pc: grub-probe reports wrong UUID for md raid1 device
has caused the Debian Bug report #682993,
regarding grub-pc: grub-probe reports wrong UUID for md raid1 device
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
682993: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682993
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.99-22.1
Severity: critical
Tags: squeeze
Justification: breaks the whole system

Summary:

grub-pc 1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1 (the version that ships with squeeze)
detects duplicate/wrong UUIDs when two mdadm arrays are present.

grub-pc 1.99-22.1 (wheezy) behaves correctly for me.


Description of the erratic behaviour (in 1.98 / squeeze):

When 2 arrays are present (md0, md1) then grub-probe reports the same
UUID for both. Also on boot only one of the two arrays is detected
(shown as (md/1) in 'ls'). If the detected array is not the bootable
array then grub-rescue kicks in (File not found) and there's no way
to proceed booting without external help (USB-stick / rescue disk).

Here's a transcript of grub-probe reporting the wrong UUIDs:

# root ~ # uname -a
Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 29 20:42:29 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux

### Two arrays are present

# root ~ # cat /proc/mdstat 
Personalities : [raid1] 
md1 : active raid1 sdc1[0]
  125024952 blocks super 1.2 [2/1] [U_]
  
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[2] sda1[4]
  1953510841 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU]

### blkid shows correct UUIDs for md0, md1:

# root ~ # blkid /dev/md0
/dev/md0: UUID=32e38502-191f-40fd-885c-682589dcccd7 TYPE=ext3 
SEC_TYPE=ext2 

# root ~ # blkid /dev/md1
/dev/md1: UUID=5fe832e7-3fcf-4fe4-8e50-f397941414e0 TYPE=ext4 

### grub-probe shows same UUID for both arrays:

# root ~ # grub-probe --version
grub-probe (GRUB) 1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1

# root ~ # grub-probe --device /dev/md0 --target=drive
(md/1)

# root ~ # grub-probe --device /dev/md1 --target=drive
(md/1)

# root ~ # grub-probe --device /dev/md0 --target=fs_uuid
5fe832e7-3fcf-4fe4-8e50-f397941414e0

# root ~ # grub-probe --device /dev/md1 --target=fs_uuid
5fe832e7-3fcf-4fe4-8e50-f397941414e0


### grub-probe remains confused also when the array is stopped.
### Note how it still shows the UUID of /dev/md1 when it is queries
### for /dev/md0.

# root ~ # mdadm --stop /dev/md1
mdadm: stopped /dev/md1

# root ~ # grub-probe --device /dev/md0 --target=fs_uuid
5fe832e7-3fcf-4fe4-8e50-f397941414e0

# root ~ # grub-probe --device /dev/md1 --target=fs_uuid
grub-probe: error: cannot stat `/dev/md1'.


### correct UUID is reported for md0 again when
### the (only) raid-member of md1 is destroyed.

# root ~ # mkfs.ext4 /dev/sdc1
...snipped...

# root ~ # grub-probe --device /dev/md0 --target=fs_uuid
32e38502-191f-40fd-885c-682589dcccd7


-- Package-specific info:

Package-info omitted because I've backported 1.99-22.1 from
wheezy which doesn't have this bug, and this is now installed.

Sorry, I'm not rolling my system back to the broken state
for the purpose of this bug-report. ;-)

-- debconf information excluded
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
version: 1.99-22.1

Fixed likely upstream in the run-up to wheezy.  Still affects squeeze,
but a backport is unlikely without someone stepping up with strong
interest.

Best wishes,
Mike---End Message---


Processed: Re: Bug#619065: vblade-persist: vblade-persist puts symlinks in /dev/etherd

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 severity 619065 normal
Bug #619065 [vblade-persist] vblade-persist: vblade-persist puts symlinks in 
/dev/etherd
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'

-- 
619065: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#619065: vblade-persist: vblade-persist puts symlinks in /dev/etherd

2012-10-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Control: severity 619065 normal

On 10/23/2012 01:52 PM, Gianluca Ciccarelli wrote:
 It seems that this bug is very old, and also that the activity upstream
 is low. Do you confirm the bug is still there, or do you think it can be
 closed or otherwise be dealt with?

I'm upstream and the debian maintainer for vblade-persist.  the activity
is low because it works for the environments it's designed for.

#619065 is an attempt to make the program behave differently in a
different environment (i.e. one where the machine offers multiple vblade
storage devices with the same slot and shelf, but on different interfaces.

I'm open for patches that would allow someone to use vblade-persist in
the context suggested, but i don't think this particular use case
warrants the current stated severity.

I'm reducing the severity of this bug to reflect the situation.

--dkg



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#689519: libapt-pkg4.12: SIGSEGV when used by apt-get or aptitude

2012-10-23 Thread Gianluca Ciccarelli
tags 689519 + unreproducible moreinfo
thanks

Hi,

I can't reproduce the bug on either wheezy or sid, as I have
installed libnvidia-compiler without problems.

Can either or both of the reporters provide more information
about how they had the bug?

-- 
Gianluca Ciccarelli
http://disi.unitn.it/~ciccarelli
GPG key ID: 0x39BBDB6C


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: libapt-pkg4.12: SIGSEGV when used by apt-get or aptitude

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 689519 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug #689519 [libapt-pkg4.12] libapt-pkg4.12: SIGSEGV when used by apt-get or 
aptitude
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
689519: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689519
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691202:

2012-10-23 Thread Andrew Ross
On 22/10/12 21:49, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
 Actually it looks like ant and javahelper are missing too.
 
 Thanks
 
 __
 This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers.
  Please use
 debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.
 

I'm slightly confused, because according to [1] the package already
build-depends on cdbs, ant, and javahelper.

[1] http://packages.debian.org/source/testing/libswingx1-java


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: bug 691271 is forwarded to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832392 ...

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 forwarded 691271 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832392
Bug #691271 [lvm2] lvm2: Losing data when moving LV between regular HD → SSD
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832392'.
 severity 691271 grave
Bug #691271 [lvm2] lvm2: Losing data when moving LV between regular HD → SSD
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
691271: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691271
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691273: netcdf-bin: nccopy produces bogus output

2012-10-23 Thread Paul Nienaber
Package: netcdf-bin
Version: 1:4.1.3-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

It appears that nccopy generates bogus (numerically, and structurally).  If 
this is not patched locally to Debian, this should be pushed upstream.  
Resulting files appear to have all missing values for dimension variables, and 
data variables cannot even be read, giving an HDF error (from `ncdump`, and the 
file is unreadable in other NetCDF utilities as well):

NetCDF: HDF error
Location: file vardata.c; line 471

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages netcdf-bin depends on:
ii  libc6 2.13-21Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libcurl3-gnutls   7.24.0-1   easy-to-use client-side URL transf
ii  libhdf5-7 [libhdf5-7] 1.8.8-9Hierarchical Data Format 5 (HDF5) 
ii  libnetcdfc7   1:4.1.3-6  An interface for scientific data a
ii  zlib1g1:1.2.6.dfsg-2 compression library - runtime

netcdf-bin recommends no packages.

netcdf-bin suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: tagging 691271

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 691271 + patch
Bug #691271 [lvm2] lvm2: Losing data when moving LV between regular HD → SSD
Added tag(s) patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
691271: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691271
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: severity of 691046 is normal

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 691046 normal
Bug #691046 [installation-reports] installation-reports: manual partitioning 
for GPT does not suggest a BIOS Boot Partition
Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
691046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691046
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: your mail

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 690428 kwin: GTK Menus randomly fail to render if Fade Effect disabled
Bug #690428 [kde-window-manager] kwin: GTK Menus randomly fail to render 
properly (patch available)
Changed Bug title to 'kwin: GTK Menus randomly fail to render if Fade Effect 
disabled' from 'kwin: GTK Menus randomly fail to render properly (patch 
available)'
 severity 690428 critical
Bug #690428 [kde-window-manager] kwin: GTK Menus randomly fail to render if 
Fade Effect disabled
Severity set to 'critical' from 'normal'
 thanks.
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
690428: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690428
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689951: Package appears to be non-free

2012-10-23 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Emmanuel,

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 05:35:18PM +0200, Emmanuel Promayon wrote:
 First sorry for not commenting on the bug, I have to find a better
 way to interact with the process, and thank you for all the
 comments.

There are two chances to get information about your packages:

  1. Either you subscribe to the very package in your interest at
   http://qa.debian.org/developer.php
  2. or with a rather more team oriented attitude subscribe the
 development mailing list which receives reports about all
 team maintained packages
   
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging

I personally would be happy if you would decide for the later because
in addition you get a lot of other information and how people might
deal together with other problems.
 
 The use of tetgen is not a fundamental feature of CamiTK (and anyway
 less important than being in contrib).
 Therefore the code depending on it can be either removed completely
 from the CamiTK package (this is an additional plugin). And the use
 of the debian packaged version is an even better solution, as you
 suggested. In this case will CamiTK remain in contrib?

In this case would CamITK remain in *main*!  Considering the fact that
you know all these facts - would you volunteer to do the needed steps?

 What is my deadline to do this without offending anyone?

Well, the release team is starting to remove packages with release
critical bugs and they start with those packages where the bugs do not
get any visible attention of the maintainer.  In other words:  If you
want to have CamITK released in Debian Wheezy than some kind of
immediate action is the safest way to ensure this.  If you have any
problem with this please be as verbose as possible how we could help you 
to fix the package.

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: severity of 690428 is important

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 690428 important
Bug #690428 [kde-window-manager] kwin: GTK Menus randomly fail to render if 
Fade Effect disabled
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
690428: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690428
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691282: Please upload to experimental forcing build against hdf5 lib in experimental (1.8.9)

2012-10-23 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Package: python-h5py
Version: 2.0.1-2+b1
Severity: serious

otherwise h5py is not usable with libhdf5 from experimental:

$ acpolicy python-h5py
python-h5py:
  Installed: 2.0.1-2+b1
  Candidate: 2.0.1-2+b1
  Version table:
 *** 2.0.1-2+b1 0
900 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/ wheezy/main amd64 Packages
600 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

$ acpolicy libhdf5-dev
libhdf5-dev:
  Installed: 1.8.9-1~exp1
  Candidate: 1.8.9-1~exp1
  Version table:
 *** 1.8.9-1~exp1 0
300 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/ experimental/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1.8.8-9 0
900 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/ wheezy/main amd64 Packages
600 http://debian.lcs.mit.edu/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages

$ python -c 'import h5py'
Warning! ***HDF5 library version mismatched error***
The HDF5 header files used to compile this application do not match
the version used by the HDF5 library to which this application is linked.
Data corruption or segmentation faults may occur if the application continues.
This can happen when an application was compiled by one version of HDF5 but
linked with a different version of static or shared HDF5 library.
You should recompile the application or check your shared library related
settings such as 'LD_LIBRARY_PATH'.
You can, at your own risk, disable this warning by setting the environment
variable 'HDF5_DISABLE_VERSION_CHECK' to a value of '1'.
Setting it to 2 or higher will suppress the warning messages totally.
Headers are 1.8.8, library is 1.8.9
SUMMARY OF THE HDF5 CONFIGURATION
=

General Information:
---
   HDF5 Version: 1.8.9
  Configured on: Mon Oct  1 16:19:18 UTC 2012
  Configured by: pbuilder@kornati
 Configure mode: production
Host system: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
  Uname information: Linux kornati 3.2.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 
02:45:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux
   Byte sex: little-endian
  Libraries: 
 Installation point: /usr

Compiling Options:
--
   Compilation Mode: production
 C Compiler: /usr/bin/cc
 CFLAGS: -g -O2 -fstack-protector 
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security
  H5_CFLAGS: -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -Wundef 
-Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align 
-Wwrite-strings -Wconversion -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes 
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs 
-Winline -Wfloat-equal -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wmissing-noreturn -Wpacked 
-Wdisabled-optimization -Wformat=2 -Wendif-labels -Wdeclaration-after-statement 
-Wold-style-definition -Winvalid-pch -Wvariadic-macros -Winit-self 
-Wmissing-include-dirs -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wunused-macros 
-Wunsafe-loop-optimizations -Wc++-compat -Wstrict-overflow -Wlogical-op 
-Wlarger-than=2048 -Wvla -Wsync-nand -Wframe-larger-than=16384 
-Wpacked-bitfield-compat -Wstrict-overflow=5 -Wjump-misses-init 
-Wunsuffixed-float-constants -Wdouble-promotion -Wsuggest-attribute=const 
-Wtrampolines -Wstack-usage=8192 -Wvector-operation-performance -O3 
-fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
  AM_CFLAGS: 
   CPPFLAGS: -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
H5_CPPFLAGS: -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199506L   -DNDEBUG 
-UH5_DEBUG_API
AM_CPPFLAGS: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE 
-D_BSD_SOURCE 
   Shared C Library: yes
   Static C Library: yes
  Statically Linked Executables: no
LDFLAGS: -Wl,-z,relro
 H5_LDFLAGS: 
 AM_LDFLAGS: 
Extra libraries:  -lpthread -lz -lrt -lm 
   Archiver: ar
 Ranlib: ranlib
  Debugged Packages: 
API Tracing: no

Languages:
--
Fortran: yes
   Fortran Compiler: /usr/bin/gfortran
  Fortran 2003 Compiler: no
  Fortran Flags: 
   H5 Fortran Flags:  
   AM Fortran Flags:  -g -O2
 Shared Fortran Library: yes
 Static Fortran Library: yes

C++: yes
   C++ Compiler: /usr/bin/c++
  C++ Flags: -g -O2 -fstack-protector 
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security
   H5 C++ Flags:  
   AM C++ Flags: 
 Shared C++ Library: yes
 Static C++ Library: yes

Features:
-
  Parallel HDF5: no
 High Level library: yes
   Threadsafety: yes
Default API Mapping: v18
 With Deprecated Public Symbols: yes
 I/O filters (external): deflate(zlib)
 I/O filters (internal): 

Bug#690370: Upload rejected

2012-10-23 Thread Bas Wijnen
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:47:29PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
 The upload has been rejected because of the following lintian error:
 embedded-library usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/fife/_fife.so: glee

I had the same problem with love. It was trivial to switch from the
upstream-provided copy to the Debian package; see the patch in love's
svn for details. (The fact that Miriam had already written most of the
patch made it even more trivial, I just had to activate the code;
thanks Miriam. :-) )

Thanks,
Bas


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#691273: Acknowledgement (netcdf-bin: nccopy produces bogus output)

2012-10-23 Thread Paul Nienaber
It appears that this bug is triggered by attempting to overwrite an 
existing NetCDF file.  We had previously created an output file of the 
same name with `ncks`, and nccopy appeared to overwrite it correctly, 
but instead left us with a mangled file, which should not happen.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#679717: severity of 679717 is serious

2012-10-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:38:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
 severity 679717 serious

To explain this a bit:

This is because it violates policy. It even can be argued to be
grave or critical, since due to unopkgs side-effects this can
(and will in some circumstances!) cause LO to not start up anymore
as the config dir *in your home* becomes root:root.

See

  * debian/shell-lib-extension.sh: set HOME to $INSTDIR also for
unopkg list --bundled  (Closes: #669271). Most probably also
closes: #619263 as $HOME isn't touched anymore.

those bugs.

So - given you didn't act on this easy to fix bug for 4 months and given
the above consequences I'll NMU it now.

Regards,

Rene


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#679717: accessodf: diff for NMU version 0.1-1.2

2012-10-23 Thread Rene Engelhard
tags 679717 + patch
tags 679717 + pending
thanks

Dear maintainer,

I've prepared an NMU for accessodf (versioned as 0.1-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.

Regards,

Rene
diff -Nru accessodf-0.1/debian/changelog accessodf-0.1/debian/changelog
--- accessodf-0.1/debian/changelog	2012-06-30 05:29:01.0 +0200
+++ accessodf-0.1/debian/changelog	2012-10-23 19:54:19.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+accessodf (0.1-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * set $HOME explicitely in unopkg usage in maintainer scripts
+(closes: #679717)
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org  Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:53:57 +0200
+
 accessodf (0.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru accessodf-0.1/debian/postinst accessodf-0.1/debian/postinst
--- accessodf-0.1/debian/postinst	2012-04-10 00:36:53.0 +0200
+++ accessodf-0.1/debian/postinst	2012-10-23 19:53:33.0 +0200
@@ -9,12 +9,12 @@
 
 add_extension() {
 echo -n Adding extension $1...
-#INSTDIR=`mktemp -d`
-unopkg add --shared $1
-#-env:UserInstallation=file:///$INSTDIR \
-#'-env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_INSTALL_DATA=$ORIGIN/../share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml' \
-#-env:JFW_PLUGIN_DO_NOT_CHECK_ACCESSIBILITY=1
-#if [ -n $INSTDIR ]; then rm -rf $INSTDIR; fi
+INSTDIR=`mktemp -d`
+HOME=$INSTDIR unopkg add --shared $1 \
+-env:UserInstallation=file:///$INSTDIR \
+'-env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_INSTALL_DATA=$ORIGIN/../share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml' \
+-env:JFW_PLUGIN_DO_NOT_CHECK_ACCESSIBILITY=1
+if [ -n $INSTDIR ]; then rm -rf $INSTDIR; fi
 echo  done.
 }
 
diff -Nru accessodf-0.1/debian/preinst accessodf-0.1/debian/preinst
--- accessodf-0.1/debian/preinst	2012-04-10 00:36:53.0 +0200
+++ accessodf-0.1/debian/preinst	2012-10-23 19:48:18.0 +0200
@@ -7,14 +7,15 @@
 set -e
 
 flush_unopkg_cache() {
-unopkg list --shared -env:JFW_PLUGIN_DO_NOT_CHECK_ACCESSIBILITY=1  /dev/null 21
+	INSTDIR=`mktemp -d`
+HOME=$INSTDIR unopkg list --shared -env:JFW_PLUGIN_DO_NOT_CHECK_ACCESSIBILITY=1  /dev/null 21
 }
 
 remove_extension() {
-  if unopkg list --shared $1 /dev/null; then
+  INSTDIR=`mktemp -d`
+  if HOME=$INSTDIR unopkg list --shared $1 /dev/null; then
 echo -n Removing extension $1...
-INSTDIR=`mktemp -d`
-unopkg remove --shared $1 \
+HOME=$INSTDIR unopkg remove --shared $1 \
   -env:UserInstallation=file://$INSTDIR \
   '-env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_INSTALL_DATA=$ORIGIN/../share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml' \
   -env:JFW_PLUGIN_DO_NOT_CHECK_ACCESSIBILITY=1
diff -Nru accessodf-0.1/debian/prerm accessodf-0.1/debian/prerm
--- accessodf-0.1/debian/prerm	2012-04-10 00:36:53.0 +0200
+++ accessodf-0.1/debian/prerm	2012-10-23 19:48:44.0 +0200
@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@
 set -e
 
 flush_unopkg_cache() {
-unopkg list --shared -env:JFW_PLUGIN_DO_NOT_CHECK_ACCESSIBILITY=1  /dev/null 21
+HOME=$INSTDIR unopkg list --shared -env:JFW_PLUGIN_DO_NOT_CHECK_ACCESSIBILITY=1  /dev/null 21
 }
 
 remove_extension() {
-if unopkg list --shared $1 /dev/null; then
+INSTDIR=`mktemp -d`
+if HOME=$INSTDIR unopkg list --shared $1 /dev/null; then
 echo -n Removing extension $1...
-INSTDIR=`mktemp -d`
-unopkg remove --shared $1 \
+HOME=$INSTDIR unopkg remove --shared $1 \
 -env:UserInstallation=file://$INSTDIR \
 '-env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_INSTALL_DATA=$ORIGIN/../share/config/javasettingsunopkginstall.xml' \
 -env:JFW_PLUGIN_DO_NOT_CHECK_ACCESSIBILITY=1


Processed: accessodf: diff for NMU version 0.1-1.2

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 679717 + patch
Bug #679717 [accessodf] accessodf: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)
Added tag(s) patch.
 tags 679717 + pending
Bug #679717 [accessodf] accessodf: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
679717: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679717
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691215: X request failed: BadDrawable

2012-10-23 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Antoine Beaupré escreveu:
 Package: pinpoint
 Version: 1:0.1.5~20120318-1+b1
 Severity: grave
 
 Pinpoint somehow doesn't work at all here in this version.
 
 anarcat@marcos:presentations$ pinpoint local-fr.pin
 X Error of failed request:  BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)
   Major opcode of failed request:  137 (DRI2)
   Minor opcode of failed request:  9 (DRI2GetMSC)
   Resource id in failed request:  0x2ea
   Serial number of failed request:  91
   Current serial number in output stream:  91
 anarcat@marcos:presentations$ pinpoint international-en.pin
 X Error of failed request:  BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter)
   Major opcode of failed request:  137 (DRI2)
   Minor opcode of failed request:  9 (DRI2GetMSC)
   Resource id in failed request:  0x2ea
   Serial number of failed request:  91
   Current serial number in output stream:  91
 
 Those two presentations work on my laptop, also running wheezy, but on
 i386 binaries.
 
 You can get a copy of those presentations in this git repository:
 
 git clone git://wiki.reseaulibre.ca/

I killed the git clone after a couple minutes, it's taking too long.
Can you please provide a tarball with only the presentation files intead
(.pin + background images)?

-- 
Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#691215: X request failed: BadDrawable

2012-10-23 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On 2012-10-23, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
 git clone git://wiki.reseaulibre.ca/

 I killed the git clone after a couple minutes, it's taking too long.
 Can you please provide a tarball with only the presentation files intead
 (.pin + background images)?

Understood.

Should I attach it straight to the bug report or host it somewhere else?

A.

-- 
Ils versent un pauvre miel sur leurs mots pourris et te parlent de pénurie
Et sur ta faim, sur tes amis, ils aiguisent leur appétit
- Richard Desjardins, La maison est ouverte


pgpYnm6YZqp7A.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#689038: camping: Does not support HTTP POST

2012-10-23 Thread Paul van Tilburg
Hi,

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:25:37PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
 Niels Thykier announced[1] that this package is a candidate for
 removal. I'm not a user of this package, so can not judge if the patch
 is sufficient, but it is comitted as is already some time upstream.
 
 Do you plan to upload the package applying the patch? Please note that
 this should happen before of the 26th october.

Yes, I am aware of it, as I filed a bug report with patch against
a package of myself, hehe.  But it has been busy and such.
I will do it tomorrow or Thursday latest.  Close call but in time.

Cheers for remembering me though,

Regards,
Paul

-- 
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux  | E-mail: pau...@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net  | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#631968: aborts on start (GNU/kFreeBSD)

2012-10-23 Thread Steven Chamberlain
reassign 631968 libglib2.0-0
found 631968 glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-2
affects 631968 gnome-terminal
tags 631968 + confirmed patch
thanks

Hi!

On 22/10/12 17:33, Simon McVittie wrote:
 I wonder whether this is to do with GDBus not supporting credentials-passing
 for authentication on kFreeBSD. It does support credentials-passing on
 FreeBSD, and it's the same kernel, so the same code ought to work; please
 try the attached patch for src:glib2.0? If successful, this can be tagged
 'patch' and reassigned to libglib2.0-0.

Thank you Simon, this is exactly the reason that gnome-terminal would
fail to connect to DBus on GNU/kFreeBSD (and quits silently with exit
status 1).

I've just tested that your patch fixed the problem on kfreebsd-amd64;
gnome-terminal now starts up and works correctly in a graphical X11
environment.  The fix looks quite typical of other GNU/kFreeBSD porting
issues.

This probably also fixes more GNOME issues, that we didn't even know of yet.

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#631968: aborts on start (GNU/kFreeBSD)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 reassign 631968 libglib2.0-0
Bug #631968 [gnome-terminal] gnome-terminal: fails to start on kFreeBSD
Bug reassigned from package 'gnome-terminal' to 'libglib2.0-0'.
No longer marked as found in versions gnome-terminal/3.2.1-2, 
gnome-terminal/3.0.1-1, gnome-terminal/3.4.0.1-1, and gnome-terminal/3.4.1.1-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #631968 to the same values 
previously set
 found 631968 glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-2
Bug #631968 [libglib2.0-0] gnome-terminal: fails to start on kFreeBSD
Marked as found in versions glib2.0/2.33.12+really2.32.4-2.
 affects 631968 gnome-terminal
Bug #631968 [libglib2.0-0] gnome-terminal: fails to start on kFreeBSD
Added indication that 631968 affects gnome-terminal
 tags 631968 + confirmed patch
Bug #631968 [libglib2.0-0] gnome-terminal: fails to start on kFreeBSD
Added tag(s) confirmed and patch.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
631968: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631968
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689946: lat: Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or directory.

2012-10-23 Thread Eric Dorland
Thanks for the patch, I'm preparing an upload now.

* gregor herrmann (gre...@debian.org) wrote:
 Control: tag -1 + patch
 
 On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:10:39 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
 
   $ lat
   Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or directory.
  
   Because /usr/bin/lat specifies /usr/lib/lat/lat.exe in that file but
   lat package has /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/lat.exe.
  
  
  $ cat lat/lat.in 
  #!/bin/sh
  @MONO@ @MONO_FLAGS@ @prefix@/lib/lat/lat.exe $@
  
  /usr/bin/lat
  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/gnome-keyring-glue.dll
  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/gnome-keyring-glue.dll.config
  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/lat.exe
  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/plugins/ActiveDirectoryCoreViews.dll
  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/plugins/JpegAttributeViewer.dll
  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/plugins/PasswordAttributeViewer.dll
  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/lat/plugins/PosixCoreViews.dll
  /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/lat-plugins.pc
 
 And:
 
  Architecture: all
 
 And:
 
 E: lat: triplet-dir-and-architecture-mismatch usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ is 
 for amd64
 N: 
 N:This package contains a directory under /lib or /usr/lib which doesn't
 N:match the proper triplet for the binary package's architecture. This is
 N:very likely to be a mistake when indicating the underlying build system
 N:where the files should be installed.
 N:
 N:Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 9.1.1 (File System Structure) for
 N:details.
 N:
 N:Severity: serious, Certainty: possible
 N:
 N:Check: files, Type: binary, udeb
 
 
 This can be fixed by passing --libdir=/usr/lib to dh_auto_configure
 in debian/rules
 
 
 But we also have:
 
 debian/rules:
 include /usr/share/cli-common/cli.make
 --
 /usr/share/cli-common/cli.make:4: WARNING: the use of 
 /usr/share/cli-common/cli.make is deprecated! Use dh $@ --with=cli instead.
 and tons of:
 dh_FOO:
 Unknown option: with
 
 But dh $@ --with=cli alone doesn't fix the path issues.
 
 
 I'm attaching my preliminary patch, but since I have no idea about
 mono and not alot about multiarch, I leave this at this point.
 
 Cheers,
 gregor
 

 diff -Nru lat-1.2.3/debian/changelog lat-1.2.3/debian/changelog
 --- lat-1.2.3/debian/changelog2012-05-27 07:57:16.0 +0200
 +++ lat-1.2.3/debian/changelog2012-10-23 19:49:41.0 +0200
 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
 +lat (1.2.3-9.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
 +
 +  * Non-maintainer upload.
 +  * Fix Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or
 +directory.:
 +- pass --libdir=/usr/lib to dh_auto_configure in debian/rules
 +- use dh $@ --with=cli in debian/rules.
 +(Closes: #689946)
 +
 + -- gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org  Tue, 23 Oct 2012 19:21:49 +0200
 +
  lat (1.2.3-9) unstable; urgency=low
  
* debian/control: Update homepage. (Closes: #656843)
 diff -Nru lat-1.2.3/debian/rules lat-1.2.3/debian/rules
 --- lat-1.2.3/debian/rules2012-05-27 07:57:16.0 +0200
 +++ lat-1.2.3/debian/rules2012-10-23 19:48:49.0 +0200
 @@ -1,12 +1,10 @@
  #!/usr/bin/make -f
  
 -include /usr/share/cli-common/cli.make
 -
  %:
 - dh $@
 + dh $@ --with=cli
  
  override_dh_auto_configure:
 - dh_auto_configure -- MCS=/usr/bin/mono-csc
 + dh_auto_configure -- MCS=/usr/bin/mono-csc --libdir=/usr/lib
  
  override_dh_auto_install:
   dh_auto_install




-- 
Eric Dorland e...@kuroneko.ca
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: ho...@jabber.com



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#631968: aborts on start (GNU/kFreeBSD)

2012-10-23 Thread Steven Chamberlain
affects 631968 + lightdm
thanks

I see that the same glib2.0 patch also fixes lightdm.

On kfreebsd-amd64 I can confirm the report below that it shows only a
blank screen.  With this glib2.0 patch it works correctly.  The issue
was not filed yet in the BTS but reported recently at:

http://lists.debian.org/ca+4ecjnpygh+qdxfexjdhuqoq+nvrhyw8bjzfzuynxxspy0...@mail.gmail.com

Regards,
-- 
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#689946: marked as done (lat: Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or directory.)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:02:29 +
with message-id e1tqpmb-0002tj...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#689946: fixed in lat 1.2.3-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #689946,
regarding lat: Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or 
directory.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689946: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689946
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Package: lat
Version: 1.2.3-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

lat doesn't start:

$ lat
Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or directory.

--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: lat
Source-Version: 1.2.3-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 689...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Eric Dorland e...@debian.org (supplier of updated lat package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:18:13 -0400
Source: lat
Binary: lat
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.3-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Dorland e...@debian.org
Changed-By: Eric Dorland e...@debian.org
Description: 
 lat- LDAP Administration Tool
Closes: 689946
Changes: 
 lat (1.2.3-10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ gregor herrmann ]
   * Fix Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or
 directory.:
 - pass --libdir=/usr/lib to dh_auto_configure in debian/rules
 - use dh $@ --with=cli in debian/rules.
 (Closes: #689946)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 8500098792b9e2b32d5bcc2ed8eaa3169484c592 1363 lat_1.2.3-10.dsc
 cbc50beed83b455e6ad029068ad9bca7bae5b74c 5536 lat_1.2.3-10.debian.tar.gz
 85f49d9d496d649c54f843cf68f63f1a21848dec 222308 lat_1.2.3-10_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 74055b7e8fb3303ca928ccd07c4fe27ca47c3094274ee4aa0866dc81ae0ae261 1363 
lat_1.2.3-10.dsc
 dfdda6dbab12bdff559315f05f20585c71693171b471091229d507f657ee97b7 5536 
lat_1.2.3-10.debian.tar.gz
 6a57ed1cca42bac184a1f04d850e2a8d1396a16f73c710cd3719fadd02bf4393 222308 
lat_1.2.3-10_all.deb
Files: 
 9255d7187bf435443e32690da2563854 1363 net optional lat_1.2.3-10.dsc
 a4416c6bc39095bc9d46759b67db698d 5536 net optional lat_1.2.3-10.debian.tar.gz
 06ed71c5b98599b64a8046e3b3b13167 222308 net optional lat_1.2.3-10_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCHPJ4ACgkQYemOzxbZcMbanwCbBM1J27urJmwE18S0xYmLJK7a
LwwAoK+sxtCLyspTuMAuRKL80dgxzgZp
=zYhN
-END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---


Bug#690947: marked as done (lat: Missing dependency on libmono-corlib2.0-cil)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:02:29 +
with message-id e1tqpmb-0002tj...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#689946: fixed in lat 1.2.3-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #689946,
regarding lat: Missing dependency on libmono-corlib2.0-cil
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
689946: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689946
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: lat
Version: 1.2.3-9
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2

When installed, the lat command gives the following output:

$ lat
The assembly mscorlib.dll was not found or could not be loaded.
It should have been installed in the `/usr/lib/mono/2.0/mscorlib.dll' directory.

The dependency which exists on this package, libmono-corlib4.0-cil, refers to
the wrong version of this file.

$ apt-file search mscorlib.dll
libmono-corlib2.0-cil: /usr/lib/mono/2.0/mscorlib.dll
libmono-corlib4.0-cil: /usr/lib/mono/4.0/mscorlib.dll


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages lat depends on:
ii  libc6  2.13-35
ii  libgconf2.0-cil2.24.2-2
ii  libglade2.0-cil2.12.10-4
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.32.3-1
ii  libglib2.0-cil 2.12.10-4
ii  libgnome-keyring0  3.4.1-1
ii  libgnome2.24-cil   2.24.2-2
ii  libgtk2.0-cil  2.12.10-4
ii  libmono-corlib4.0-cil  2.10.8.1-5
ii  libmono-ldap4.0-cil2.10.8.1-5
ii  libmono-posix4.0-cil   2.10.8.1-5
ii  libmono-security4.0-cil2.10.8.1-5
ii  libmono-system-xml4.0-cil  2.10.8.1-5
ii  libmono-system4.0-cil  2.10.8.1-5
ii  mono-runtime   2.10.8.1-5

lat recommends no packages.

lat suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: lat
Source-Version: 1.2.3-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
lat, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 689...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Eric Dorland e...@debian.org (supplier of updated lat package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 20:18:13 -0400
Source: lat
Binary: lat
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.2.3-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Eric Dorland e...@debian.org
Changed-By: Eric Dorland e...@debian.org
Description: 
 lat- LDAP Administration Tool
Closes: 689946
Changes: 
 lat (1.2.3-10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ gregor herrmann ]
   * Fix Cannot open assembly '/usr/lib/lat/lat.exe': No such file or
 directory.:
 - pass --libdir=/usr/lib to dh_auto_configure in debian/rules
 - use dh $@ --with=cli in debian/rules.
 (Closes: #689946)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 8500098792b9e2b32d5bcc2ed8eaa3169484c592 1363 lat_1.2.3-10.dsc
 cbc50beed83b455e6ad029068ad9bca7bae5b74c 5536 lat_1.2.3-10.debian.tar.gz
 85f49d9d496d649c54f843cf68f63f1a21848dec 222308 lat_1.2.3-10_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 74055b7e8fb3303ca928ccd07c4fe27ca47c3094274ee4aa0866dc81ae0ae261 1363 
lat_1.2.3-10.dsc
 dfdda6dbab12bdff559315f05f20585c71693171b471091229d507f657ee97b7 5536 
lat_1.2.3-10.debian.tar.gz
 6a57ed1cca42bac184a1f04d850e2a8d1396a16f73c710cd3719fadd02bf4393 222308 
lat_1.2.3-10_all.deb
Files: 
 9255d7187bf435443e32690da2563854 1363 net optional lat_1.2.3-10.dsc
 a4416c6bc39095bc9d46759b67db698d 5536 net optional lat_1.2.3-10.debian.tar.gz
 06ed71c5b98599b64a8046e3b3b13167 222308 net optional lat_1.2.3-10_all.deb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCHPJ4ACgkQYemOzxbZcMbanwCbBM1J27urJmwE18S0xYmLJK7a
LwwAoK+sxtCLyspTuMAuRKL80dgxzgZp
=zYhN
-END PGP SIGNATUREEnd Message---


Processed: Re: getmail4: Mboxrd format is not supported

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 severity 633799 critical
Bug #633799 [getmail4] getmail4: Mboxrd format is not supported
Severity set to 'critical' from 'wishlist'
 forwarded 633799 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.getmail.user/4576
Bug #633799 [getmail4] getmail4: Mboxrd format is not supported
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 
'http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.getmail.user/4576'.
 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
633799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: retitle

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 retitle 633799 getmail causes irrecoverable mail corruption when using mbox
Bug #633799 [getmail4] getmail4: Mboxrd format is not supported
Changed Bug title to 'getmail causes irrecoverable mail corruption when using 
mbox' from 'getmail4: Mboxrd format is not supported'
 stop
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
633799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633799
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: re: Please upload to experimental forcing build against hdf5 lib in experimental (1.8.9)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 severity -1 wishlist
Bug #691282 [python-h5py] Please upload to experimental forcing build against 
hdf5 lib in experimental (1.8.9)
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'serious'

-- 
691282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691282: Please upload to experimental forcing build against hdf5 lib in experimental (1.8.9)

2012-10-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
control: severity -1 wishlist

 Please upload to experimental forcing build against hdf5 lib in experimental 
 (1.8.9)
 otherwise h5py is not usable with libhdf5 from experimental:

Making other packages work in conjunction with experimental versions
is a wishlist item.  If you need packages to work well together,
please stick to unstable or lower.

Best wishes,
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691273: netcdf-bin: nccopy produces bogus output

2012-10-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
control: severity -1 wishlist

 It appears that this bug is triggered by attempting to overwrite an
 existing NetCDF file.  We had previously created an output file of the
 same name with `ncks`, and nccopy appeared to overwrite it correctly,
 but instead left us with a mangled file, which should not happen.

This is more of a wishlist bug since entails implementing additional
functionality, and only results from user mistake.  It would probably
be better to report this upstream.

Best wishes,
Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: re: netcdf-bin: nccopy produces bogus output

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 severity -1 wishlist
Bug #691273 [netcdf-bin] netcdf-bin: nccopy produces bogus output
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'grave'

-- 
691273: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691273
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: fixed 683107 in 2.7.3-3

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 fixed 683107 2.7.3-3
Bug #683107 [src:python-defaults] bpython: python3 shebang after rebuild
Bug #683108 [src:python-defaults] ipython: python3 shebangs
Bug #683294 [src:python-defaults] python3: don't rewrite python shebangs to 
python3
Marked as fixed in versions python-defaults/2.7.3-3.
Marked as fixed in versions python-defaults/2.7.3-3.
Marked as fixed in versions python-defaults/2.7.3-3.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
683107: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683107
683108: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683108
683294: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683294
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#683107: marked as done (bpython: python3 shebang after rebuild)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:55:21 -0400
with message-id 2143336.2jYgbiO43D@scott-latitude-e6320
and subject line Fixed in 2.7.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683107,
regarding bpython: python3 shebang after rebuild
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683107: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683107
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Package: bpython
Version: 0.11-1
Severity: serious

If you rebuild bpython in an up-to-date sid chroot, /usr/bin/bpython 
ends up with #! /usr/bin/python3 shebang.


--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Bug number was inadvertently left out of the changelog.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#683108: marked as done (ipython: python3 shebangs)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:55:21 -0400
with message-id 2143336.2jYgbiO43D@scott-latitude-e6320
and subject line Fixed in 2.7.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683107,
regarding ipython: python3 shebangs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683107: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683107
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---

Package: ipython
Version: 0.13-1
Severity: serious

If you rebuild ipython in an up-to-date sid chroot, the following 
scripts end up with #! /usr/bin/python3 shebangs:


/usr/bin/ipcluster
/usr/bin/ipcontroller
/usr/bin/ipengine
/usr/bin/iplogger
/usr/bin/ipython
/usr/bin/irunner
/usr/bin/pycolor

--
Jakub Wilk
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Bug number was inadvertently left out of the changelog.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#683294: marked as done (python3: don't rewrite python shebangs to python3)

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:55:21 -0400
with message-id 2143336.2jYgbiO43D@scott-latitude-e6320
and subject line Fixed in 2.7.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683107,
regarding python3: don't rewrite python shebangs to python3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
683107: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683107
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: python3
Version: 3.2.3-4
Severity: important

I think rewriting python shebangs to python3 is a bad idea.  It's kind
of like rewriting perl to python3.  It has broken a number of packages,
it breaks reasonable expectations (e.g. that dh_foo is a nop for
non-foo-related packages), and I don't know of a case where it is useful
to do this transformation.  Thanks for considering.

Cheers,
Julien


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Bug number was inadvertently left out of the changelog.



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
---End Message---


Bug#688259: zangband: modifies shipped files during postinst

2012-10-23 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 17:13 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
 
 i had a look at the issue and prepared a patch for it. 

Thanks Markus, I'll try to check it and upload this week.


 Drew, if you are still interested in having a co-maintainer, i can prepare a
 new version for zangband and fix some lintian warnings. 

That'd be great Markus.  Wait till I upload your patch, then you can
work from the new version.

Drew


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#678890: scim: fail to start scim after latest upgrade

2012-10-23 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Control: tags 678890 patch

Hi,

 The NMU adds some cruft:

  Makefile |  638 +
  config.log   |  183 +
  config.status|  753 
 +++

snip

  32 files changed, 7843 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

 Please fix.

I attached patch which removed unnecessary patch.

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro

-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: Re: Bug#678890: scim: fail to start scim after latest upgrade

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

 tags 678890 patch
Bug #678890 [prime] scim: fail to start scim after latest upgrade
Added tag(s) patch.

-- 
678890: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678890
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Bug#691306: [iptables] iptables add 4 rules instead just one in kernel INPUT chain

2012-10-23 Thread LACROIX Jean Marc

Package: iptables
Version: 1.4.8-3
Severity: grave

On Debian Squeeze i386 (and PowerPC), and also on Debian Wheezy,
iptables add 4 rules in kernel INPUT instead just one as in
following example.

sudo iptables --flush INPUT

sudo iptables --list INPUT
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source   destination

 sudo /sbin/iptables --insert INPUT --proto TCP --destination-port 
12345 --source localhost --destination  localhost --jump DROP --match 
comment --comment 'from test'


 sudo iptables --list INPUT

Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source   destination
DROP   tcp  --  localhostlocalhosttcp 
dpt:12345 /* from test */
DROP   tcp  --  localhostlocalhosttcp 
dpt:12345 /* from test */
DROP   tcp  --  localhostlocalhosttcp 
dpt:12345 /* from test */
DROP   tcp  --  localhostlocalhosttcp 
dpt:12345 /* from test */

libcommon@vm-wheezy-x86-ia32-1:/tmp$

But if using 127.0.0.1 instead localhost on source, then only 2 rules 
are inserted as following exemple


sudo iptables --flush INPUT

sudo /sbin/iptables --insert INPUT --proto TCP --destination-port 12345 
--source 127.0.0.1  --destination  localhost --jump DROP --match comment 
--comment 'from test'


 sudo iptables --list INPUT
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source   destination
DROP   tcp  --  localhostlocalhosttcp 
dpt:12345 /* from test */
DROP   tcp  --  localhostlocalhosttcp 
dpt:12345 /* from test */


And finally, if using only IP canonical adress, then no problems occurs 
and just only one rule is inserted in the kernel...


sudo iptables --flush INPUT


 sudo /sbin/iptables --insert INPUT --proto TCP --destination-port 
12345 --source 127.0.0.1   --destination   127.0.0.1   --jump DROP 
--match comment --comment 'from test'


sudo iptables --list INPUT
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
target prot opt source   destination
DROP   tcp  --  localhostlocalhosttcp 
dpt:12345 /* from test */


This behavior is difficult to avoid if you handle hundreds of rules
when trying to suppress dedicated rules !

Many thanks in advance to correct it
Best regards


--
--
 -- Jean-Marc LACROIX --
  -- mailto : jeanmarc.lacr...@free.fr --
---


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Processed: r2197 - in mysql-5.5/branches/wheezy/debian: . patches

2012-10-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 tags 690778 pending
Bug #690778 [mysql-5.5] mysql-5.5: New security issues from October Patch Update
Added tag(s) pending.
 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
690778: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=690778
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org