Bug#1037605: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Ricardo Mones ) (Bug#1037605: fixed in claws-mail 4.1.1-3)
Hi Adrian, On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 19:10:04 +0300 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 05:12:05PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System > wrote: > >... > > Architecture: source amd64 all > >... > > claws-mail (4.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=high > >... > > Can you make an additional source-only upload for testing migration? Sure, was going to made it last weekend but seemed impossible to build packages in my cowbuilder because some problem with binutils rendered the cow non-updatable... but that seems fixed now, and... uploaded :) Thanks for the heads up! -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Tonight you will pay the wages of sin; Don't forget to leave a tip.» pgpRLO1kss9kr.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1036799: sylpheed: unable to send or read email after upgrading to Debian 12
control: severity -1 important Hi José Luis, On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 14:22:34 +0200 José Luis González wrote: > control: severity -1 grave > > Hi Ricardo, > > > Right, but that doesn't deserve a 'grave' severity as only gsmtp > > users are affected and no data is lost or security hole is > > introduced. I've adjusted this accordingly. > > The definition of grave severity is: > > grave > makes the package in question unusable or mostly so, or > causes data loss, or introduces a security hole allowing access to the > accounts of users who use the package. > > This bug renders sylpheed unusuable or mostly so for me, so it is > indeed a grave bug. I am restoring severity accordingly. No, it's not. That "for me" you added is the part that is not mentioned in the definition and that's a quite important difference: that the package is unusable for _you_ doesn't make it unusable for _everybody_, and that's what the definition mean when it says the package is unusable. Anybody not using Gmail can use Sylpheed without problems, for example, so even if it makes unusable it for you, please keep severity as it should be. > > That has been reported on the list that downgrading to 3.7.0 fixes > > the problem: > > https://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/sylpheed/2023-May/007129.html > > > Can you check if downgrading fixes it? > > I wish I could check it but so far the only way I have to do so is > installing from source. What I can confirm is the bug appeared when > upgrading from version 3.7.0 to version 3.8.0~beta1-1. Building Sylpheed 3.7.0 from source in Debian 12 is pretty simple, go to some empty dir and run: $ sudo apt install build-essential devscripts $ sudo apt build-dep sylpheed $ dget http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/sylpheed/sylpheed_3.7.0-8.dsc $ cd sylpheed-3.7.0/ $ dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc $ cd .. $ sudo dpkg -i sylpheed_3.7.0-8_amd64.deb > I hope you understand this bug is preventing me from using sylpheed > and so from reading and writing email, unless from gmail's web > interface. I find of great concern that the bug is in Debian's new > stable distribution: bookworm. If you know the bug is in version > 3.8.0~beta1-1 I would suggest downgrading stable to 3.7.0 if you can > manage to do so. Yeah, I understand the situation is not funny for you. Fact is upstream has still not dealt with this bug despite the time passed (months), so there's no patch I can apply to current version. This fact joined with the increased slowness of upstream development during the past years makes me wonder if it's still worth to maintain Sylpheed within Debian. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Bank error in your favor. Collect $200.»
Bug#1036799: sylpheed: unable to send or read email after upgrading to Debian 12
control: severity -1 important control: tags -1 confirmed control: forwarded -1 https://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/sylpheed/2023-May/007127.html Hi José Luis, On Fri, 26 May 2023 17:46:44 +0200 José Luis González wrote: > Package: sylpheed > Version: 3.8.0~beta1-1 > Severity: grave > > After upgrading to Debian 12 and booting again the computer I am > unable to use sylpheed to neither send email with both accounts I > have set up, nor read new messages, just with the IMAP one in this > case. > > Both accounts are from Gmail. > > The error message I get trying to send with the POP3 is > > Error > > Hubo un error enviando el mensaje: > 501 5.5.2 Cannot Decode response > r11-20020a5d494b00b00300aee6c9cesm5425569wrs.20 - gsmtp > > while with the IMAP one is > > Hubo un error enviando el mensaje: > 501 5.5.2 Cannot Decode response > j13-20020a5d604d00b00306344eaebfsm5456150wrt.28 - gsmtp > > Whereas, trying to open the inbox of the IMAP one, or any other > folder, gets this: > > Error > > No se pudo establecer una conexión con el servidor. > > making it impossible to read or query new mail. Right, but that doesn't deserve a 'grave' severity as only gsmtp users are affected and no data is lost or security hole is introduced. I've adjusted this accordingly. That has been reported on the list that downgrading to 3.7.0 fixes the problem: https://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/sylpheed/2023-May/007129.html Can you check if downgrading fixes it? best regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Tempt not a desperate man. -- William Shakespeare, "Romeo and Juliet"»
Bug#1005840: claws-mail-themes: includes non-free content (CC-by-nc-sa-v3.0)
On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:38:20 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > Control: fixed -1 claws-mail-themes/20221017+dfsg.1-1 > > > [it seems to me that control directives in messages sent to -done > addresses are not processed... I am repeating the directive for this > reason] Umm, how inconvenient, but thanks anyway! :) > > On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 18:08:55 +0100 Ricardo Mones wrote: > > > control: fixed -1 claws-mail-themes/20221017+dfsg.1-1 > > > > On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 17:55:23 +0100 > > Francesco Poli wrote: > > […] > > > > Yeah, agreed, but given I doubt that can be possible at this > > > > point to make upstream release a new tarball just to fix those > > > > bits, specially without a contact address. Will try to ask > > > > upstream if somebody has his contact, otherwise I'm afraid the > > > > only solution will be the removal. > > > > > > Thanks for willing to attempt this. > > > Let's see how it goes... > > > > Despite the time passed, efforts were worth it and it went well :-) > > > [...] > > This is great news, indeed! > Thanks for your efforts. > > > Now, if only the licensing status of Fugue/* were also ironed out... > See the original bug report! ;-) Oh, the joys of reporting two problems on one bug… had lost track of this one! The original web from where the theme icons are being reused (http://www.pinvoke.com/) still works and points to the licence so I tend to agree this is CC-BY-3.0, furthermore the theme includes the full text in the LICENSE.txt, so I've updated the copyright file¹. Presumably this can be improved if #884224 is fixed at some point ;-) Regarding persuading authors to switch licenses, well, my feeling is that you have the same power than me to do that. As you rightly said, the license is accepted by Debian currently, and that, very likely, outweighs any other argument you can give to them. best regards, ¹ https://salsa.debian.org/claws-mail-team/claws-mail-themes/-/commit/84ce4ff4d7141d5a95c57fec67556d8350f9ad81 -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Alimony and bribes will engage a large share of your wealth.»
Bug#1019604: Any plans to fix this?
Hi maintainers, Just wondering, after Claws Mail being removed from testing because of this bug… is there any ongoing plan to fix this bug before freeze starts or should I play safer and remove the bsfilter plugin from Claws Mail to allow migration again? thanks in advance for any response, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Don't look now, but there is a multi-legged creature on your shoulder.» pgpH3rdiKWHOA.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#1010232: Processed: severity of 1010232 is serious
On Fri, 13 May 2022 18:13:36 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote: > BTW, https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/claws-mail also argues: > > ∙ Not built on buildd: arch amd64 binaries uploaded by mones > ∙ Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by mones, a new > source-only upload is needed to allow migration > > Looks like an oversight when doing the upload. (Occasionally happens > to me, too. Old habits… ;-) Yep, it happened to me too. But not this time: is not possible to do a source-only upload when there's new binary packages ;-) regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Not only Guinness - Linux is good for you, too. -- Banzai on IRC» pgpeotG2pNOXb.pgp Description: Firma digital OpenPGP
Bug#1010232: Processed: severity of 1010232 is serious
control: tags -1 fixed pending On Thu, 12 May 2022 23:21:03 + Axel Beckert wrote: > > # Typos in hard dependencies are clearly release-critical Indeed, thanks for adjusting severity. Unfortunately I didn't receive the original bug report, so thanks also for the heads up. Adjusting tags accordingly¹. best regards, ¹ https://salsa.debian.org/claws-mail-team/claws-mail/-/commit/02f82af95fda4e3d5c241567edbc2a5eddcc0e26 -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker» pgpVPP9Yjw2gc.pgp Description: Firma digital OpenPGP
Bug#1009473: claws-mail: FTBFS: perl.h:736:25: error: expected expression before ‘do’
control: tags -1 confirmed fixed pending
control: affects 1009149 claws-mail
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 07:45:18PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: claws-mail
> Version: 4.0.0-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20220412 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > In file included from perl_plugin.c:51:
> > perl_plugin.c: In function ‘XS_ClawsMail_filter_init’:
> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.34/CORE/perl.h:736:25: error: expected
> > expression before ‘do’
> > 736 | # define STMT_START do
> > | ^~
> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.34/CORE/XSUB.h:333:24: note: in expansion
> > of macro ‘STMT_START’
> > 333 | #define XSRETURN_UV(v) STMT_START { XST_mUV(0,v); XSRETURN(1); }
> > STMT_END
> > |^~
> > perl_plugin.c:576:27: note: in expansion of macro ‘XSRETURN_UV’
> > 576 | msginfo->size ? XSRETURN_UV(msginfo->size) :
> > XSRETURN_UNDEF;
> > | ^~~
[…]
Already fixed in salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/claws-mail-team/claws-mail/-/blob/master/debian/patches/20cope_with_fix_for_1009149.patch
> If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as
> 'affects'-ing
> this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
This is caused by the fix of #1009149¹, which invalidates the usage of
XSRETURN macros within expressions just because clang "warns a lot" and
because it has "little value", oh well.
Nevertheless I wonder why the above fix is not updating some doc to
reflect this new behaviour, but perhaps that's been done in other patch.
regards,
¹
https://salsa.debian.org/perl-team/interpreter/perl/-/commit/c949a3d4176ec66493af1aa87c1dc64fc6127bb6
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Carl Sagan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Bug#1008765: claws-mail: build-depends on unavailable package libltdl3-dev
Package: claws-mail Version: 4.0.0-3 Severity: grave Tags: ftbfs Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: mo...@debian.org Just noticed claws-mail is also affected by 2.4.7-2 upload of libtool, like detailed in bugs #1008470 and #1008698. This is a remainder to my future self to fix it next week, taking advantage of the next upstream release this weekend. -- System Information: Debian Release: 11.2 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Bug#1005840: claws-mail-themes: includes non-free content (CC-by-nc-sa-v3.0)
On Sun, 27 Feb 2022 12:21:47 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote: > On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 22:08:17 +0100 Ricardo Mones wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:12:54 +0100 > > "Francesco Poli (wintermute)" wrote: > [...] > > > Files: UltimateClawsMail0.5.1/* > [...] > > > License: CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 > [...] > > > > > > This is non-free, since it's non-commercial. > > > Please persuade its upstream copyright holder to re-license it > > > under DFSG-free terms (such as the GNU GPL) or drop the theme > > > from the package. > > > > Curiously enough, upstream site¹ says it's licensed under GPL: > > > > > The author of the Ultimate Gnome theme has graciously allowed me to > > > publish Ultimate Claws Mail under the GPL rather than Creative Commons. > > > UCM is now licensed under the GPL v3. > > That's encouraging! Thanks for investigating. > > > > > But the themeinfo metadata included in the tarball still says CC... > > Very awkward... > > > not sure > > if the above is enough to update the license on Debian's copyright and > > themeinfo or not though. What do you think? > [...] > > I think the best way forward is to get in touch with upstream copyright > holders and seek clarification. That can be difficult, since I'm unable to find any address of the Author within the upstream website or tarball. Furthermore seems that discussion already happened: https://code.google.com/archive/p/ultimate-claws-mail/issues/1 > Ideally, the metadata included in the upstream distribution tar archive > should be consistent with the statement on the upstream website. > > I would be great, if that theme were clearly and explicitly licensed > under the terms of the GNU GPL. Yeah, agreed, but given I doubt that can be possible at this point to make upstream release a new tarball just to fix those bits, specially without a contact address. Will try to ask upstream if somebody has his contact, otherwise I'm afraid the only solution will be the removal. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Try to divide your time evenly to keep others happy.» pgpH20VA1nL_d.pgp Description: Firma digital OpenPGP
Bug#1005840: claws-mail-themes: includes non-free content (CC-by-nc-sa-v3.0)
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:12:54 +0100 "Francesco Poli (wintermute)" wrote: > Package: claws-mail-themes > Version: 20140629+dfsg2-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 2.2.1 > > Hello and thanks for maintaining claws-mail. > > I noticed that one of the themes shipped in package 'claws-mail-themes' > is non-free and should not be included in a package in Debian main: > > Files: UltimateClawsMail0.5.1/* > Copyright: >Daniel LaGesse > License: CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0 > Comment: >http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ > > This is non-free, since it's non-commercial. > Please persuade its upstream copyright holder to re-license it > under DFSG-free terms (such as the GNU GPL) or drop the theme > from the package. Curiously enough, upstream site¹ says it's licensed under GPL: > The author of the Ultimate Gnome theme has graciously allowed me to > publish Ultimate Claws Mail under the GPL rather than Creative Commons. > UCM is now licensed under the GPL v3. But the themeinfo metadata included in the tarball still says CC... not sure if the above is enough to update the license on Debian's copyright and themeinfo or not though. What do you think? regards, ¹ https://code.google.com/archive/p/ultimate-claws-mail/ -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «This fortune intentionally says nothing.» pgpbb2e2sL33g.pgp Description: Firma digital OpenPGP
Bug#993743: xdemorse: autopkgtest regression: warning on stderr
control: tags -1 confirmed pending Hi Paul, On Sun, Sep 05, 2021 at 09:57:18PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: xdemorse > Version: 3.6.4-1 > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org, mo...@debian.org > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: regression > > Dear maintainer(s), > > With a recent upload of xdemorse the autopkgtest of xdemorse fails in > testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of > xdemorse from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from > testing. In tabular form: > >passfail > xdemorse from testing3.6.4-1 > all others from testingfrom testing > > I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report. Looking at the > actual test, I wonder how useful it is. There was a discussion somewhere > recently about xvfb and maybe also about ending with "&", but I forgot > the details. It may be that the test can't fail (apart from output to > stderr, which is exactly what's happening here). [...] It's caused by another component's output, and it's already fixed in git: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/xdemorse/-/commit/61863d48adc8fee43f76e9d97b1fc75009415a69 Will be included in upload of new upstream version, probably during this week, but feel free to do so if you have plenty free time, no problem. Thanks for reporting! :-) -- Ricardo Mones ~ I'm sorry, my responses are limited. You must ask the right questions. A hologram signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#989319: Sylpheed: inbox messages missing
control: severity -1 normal control: tags -1 = unreproducible moreinfo Hi José, On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 04:01:01AM +0200, José Luis González wrote: > Package: sylpheed > Version: 3.7.0-4 > Severity: critical > Tags: upstream > > Since about a month or two Sylpheed isn't showing me my inbox > messages. However it's printed 0/n total, with n > 0. Sorry, but don't really understand what you mean here. Firstly, what type of account are you using? Can you please also detail the steps you're taking since opening the application up to the point you call "show my inbox", what would you expect and what you currently see? (feel free to send some screenshot) regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Don't take the name of root in vain. /usr/src/linux/README signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#982047: wordwarvi
Hi Joe, On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:15:01 -0500 Joe Nahmias wrote: > Hi Ricardo, > > Sorry, been afk for a few days... Yep, I guessed so, no problem. > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 12:48:45PM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 07:10:46PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote: > > > > > > Indeed, fortuitous timing! He just tagged and closed your issue.Yes, > > > I'm familiar with packaging and at one point was the maintainer for > > > this package, so I should be okay ;)--Joe > > > > Well, for the next time I'd suggest you to push your changes to salsa > > *before* uploading or at least *immediately after* uploading ;-) > > Hmm, I did push to salsa -- I even see the tags there! > Ah, I see what happened. I was using the debian/master branch, but the > salsa repo default is just master. Do you have a preference one way or the > other? Well, I like master (or main) or also being enlightened, if better alternatives exists ;-) > > If you don't have the time or willingness to do it, just please push > > your pending git commits, I'd like to fix #982047 ASAP. > > I can push/upload a fix for this tonight. Thanks for the upload! best regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «It is a hard matter, my fellow citizens, to argue with the belly, since it has no ears. -- Marcus Porcius Cato» pgpyeBgXQUrb0.pgp Description: Firma digital OpenPGP
Bug#982047: wordwarvi
control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Joe, On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 07:10:46PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote: > > Indeed, fortuitous timing! He just tagged and closed your issue.Yes, > I'm familiar with packaging and at one point was the maintainer for > this package, so I should be okay ;)--Joe Well, for the next time I'd suggest you to push your changes to salsa *before* uploading or at least *immediately after* uploading ;-) If you don't have the time or willingness to do it, just please push your pending git commits, I'd like to fix #982047 ASAP. Thanks in advance, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Everything will be just tickety-boo today.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#944424: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Nobuhiro Iwamatsu ) (Bug#944424: fixed in cairo-dock-plug-ins 3.4.1-6)
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 07:51:07AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the src:cairo-dock-plug-ins package: > > #944424: cairo-dock-plug-ins: libetpan 1.9.4 uses now pkg-config > > It has been closed by Debian FTP Masters > (reply to Nobuhiro Iwamatsu ). Thank you! best regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ I'm sorry, my responses are limited. You must ask the right questions. A hologram signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#944456: Bug#944424: cairo-dock-plug-ins: libetpan 1.9.4 uses now pkg-config
control: severity 944424 serious control: severity 944456 serious On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 08:55:10AM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 09:30:07PM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: > > I've just uploaded the new version to experimental, so you can test > > building with it. > > > > In a month or so will raise the severity of this bug when uploading to > > unstable. Please, let me know if you need more time to solve this. > > The version of libetpan currently in experimental will be uploaded to > unstable on 1st week of 2020, unless somebody objects to. Finally it has been uploaded today, sorry for the delay. regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Don't take the name of root in vain. /usr/src/linux/README signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#936307: claws-mail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye - reopen 936307
Hi Sandro, On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 09:23:59PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > This bug was closed, but the package has still some dependencies towards > Python2 packages, in details: > > (binary:claws-mail-tools)Depends->python > > Re-opening, so that they can be taken care of. Thanks! Hadn't noticed tools' python scripts were still at version 2. best regards and apologies for the premature closing ;-) -- Ricardo Mones ~ You have the capacity to learn from mistakes. You'll learn a lot today. /usr/games/fortune signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#936307: claws-mail: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
control: block -1 by 943308 On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 05:24:42PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > The python-gtk2 dependency has an RC issue now. https://bugs.debian.org/937452 > It looks like nobody wants to step up to maintain that. What are you planning > to do? It's already done... :-) -- Ricardo Mones ~ I'm sorry, my responses are limited. You must ask the right questions. A hologram signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#927709: libetpan: GnuTLS timeouts are 1000 times shorter than configured
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 09:10:26PM +0100, Chris Boot wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > Control: tags -1 patch > > Dear Maintainer, > > I think this bug should be RC given that it appears to make some > important (to some people at least) software potentially unusable on > Buster. Please feel free to downgrade if you particularly disagree, though. Isn't that basically the definition of 'important' severity level? :-) Anyway, haven't looked at the bug or the fix, just arriving from a short trip, so if you feel serious is more appropriate, so be it. thanks, -- Ricardo Mones ~ I'm sorry, my responses are limited. You must ask the right questions. A hologram signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#913383: libetpan FTBFS with curl 7.62.0
control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/dinhviethoa/libetpan/issues/313 control: tags -1 upstream Hi Adrian, On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 13:08:24 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: libetpan > Version: 1.9.1-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/libetpan.html > > ... > newsfeed.c: In function 'curl_error_convert': > newsfeed.c:538:3: error: duplicate case value >case CURLE_SSL_CACERT: >^~~~ > newsfeed.c:533:3: note: previously used here >case CURLE_SSL_PEER_CERTIFICATE: >^~~~ > make[9]: *** [Makefile:579: newsfeed.lo] Error 1 > > > For background see > https://github.com/curl/curl/commit/3f3b26d6feb0667714902e836af608094235fca2 Thanks for reporting, forwarding upstream. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Your own mileage may vary.»
Bug#908063: Bug #908063 in sylpheed marked as pending
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #908063 in sylpheed reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: https://salsa.debian.org/sylpheed-team/sylpheed/commit/29834adc1a6ff7685990097db08e2ba1bea39c74 Patch to set SNI until available in new upstream release Closes: #908063 Thanks: Antonio Ospite for the patch (this message was generated automatically) -- Greetings https://bugs.debian.org/908063
Bug#862879: Port from libnm-util/libnm-glib to libnm (or GNetworkMonitor)
Hi Michael, On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 01:04:33AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Control: severity -1 serious > > Hi, > > I intend to upload a new version of network-manager soonish which will > drop libnm-glib/libnm-util. I'm thus bumping this issue to RC in > preparation for that. OK, thanks for the info. best regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Carl Sagan signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#868700: claws-mail: Segfaults when selected from application menu or command line
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 03:13:21PM +0100, Joe wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 23:14:15 +0200 > Ricardo Mones <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:22:12PM +0100, Joe wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:57:24 +0200 > > > Ricardo Mones <mo...@debian.org> wrote: > > [...] > > > > Does this crash happen when you start claws-mail from command > > > > line? > > > > > > Yes, this output was from a command line. > > > > > > > > > > > If it does, can you install debug packages¹ and get the backtrace > > > > when running inside gdb²? > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps: > > > > > > joe@jrenet:~$ gdb claws-mail > > [...[ > > > (gdb) run > > [...[ > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > > __strchr_sse2 () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strchr-sse2.S:90 > > > 90../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strchr-sse2.S: No such > > > file or directory. (gdb) > > > > You forgot to type "thread apply all bt" command at this point, and > > post the backtraces which are printed after it ;-) > > OK, I'm not a developer, I had to look up how to make a program work in > gdb. I've included the whole output, in case the earlier numbers were > different for this run: [...] Please do it again with the debug packages installed first, as mentioned in the first message, though the provided link was probably not the best one, my apologies. See this link for instructions on how to add the archive for debug packages installed: https://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace#Installing_the_debugging_symbols Once you have the debug archive just install claws-mail-dbgsym package and repeat the gdb steps and post back the output. Thanks in advance, -- Ricardo Mones ~ I'm sorry, my responses are limited. You must ask the right questions. A hologram signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#868700: claws-mail: Segfaults when selected from application menu or command line
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 09:22:12PM +0100, Joe wrote: > On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 18:57:24 +0200 > Ricardo Mones <mo...@debian.org> wrote: [...] > > Does this crash happen when you start claws-mail from command line? > > Yes, this output was from a command line. > > > > > If it does, can you install debug packages¹ and get the backtrace when > > running inside gdb²? > > > > Hope this helps: > > joe@jrenet:~$ gdb claws-mail [...[ > (gdb) run [...[ > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > __strchr_sse2 () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strchr-sse2.S:90 > 90../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strchr-sse2.S: No such file or directory. > (gdb) You forgot to type "thread apply all bt" command at this point, and post the backtraces which are printed after it ;-) regards, P.S.: Please, don't remove bug's address from Cc, it helps me tracking bugs better, thanks! -- Ricardo Mones ~ You have the capacity to learn from mistakes. You'll learn a lot today. /usr/games/fortune signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#868700: claws-mail: Segfaults when selected from application menu or command line
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Joe, On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 08:54:20PM +0100, Joe wrote: > Package: claws-mail > Version: 3.15.0-2+b1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Since upgrade to 3.15.0-2, claws-mail segfaults when I try to run it: > > joe@jrenet:~$ claws-mail > > (claws-mail:3276): Claws-Mail-CRITICAL **: imap_item_get_path: assertion > 'folder_path != NULL' failed > folder.c:3967 Condition path != NULL failed > traceback: > 0:claws-mail() [0x80cf2f8] > 1:claws-mail() [0x80d275f] > 2:claws-mail(folder_item_get_msg_list+0x7f) [0x80d311f] > 3:claws-mail() [0x80dc881] > 4:claws-mail() [0x80dd017] > 5:claws-mail(gtk_sctree_insert_gnode+0x136) [0x828f386] > 6:claws-mail(gtk_sctree_insert_gnode+0x1f7) [0x828f447] > 7:claws-mail(gtk_sctree_insert_gnode+0x1f7) [0x828f447] > 8:claws-mail(folderview_set+0x25c) [0x80df4bc] > 9:claws-mail() [0x80df701] > 10: claws-mail() [0x822de41] > 11: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_hook_list_marshal+0x67) > [0xb6a7f847] > 12: claws-mail(hooks_invoke+0x64) [0x822e554] > 13: claws-mail(folder_add+0xc1) [0x80cc151] > 14: claws-mail(folder_read_list+0x79) [0x80d0959] > 15: claws-mail(main+0xc65) [0x80839d5] > 16: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf6) [0xb6191276] > 17: claws-mail() [0x80857ea] > > > (claws-mail:3276): Claws-Mail-CRITICAL **: imap_item_get_path: assertion > 'folder_path != NULL' failed > folder.c:3991 Condition path != NULL failed > traceback: > 0:claws-mail() [0x80cf608] > 1:claws-mail() [0x80d276c] > 2:claws-mail(folder_item_get_msg_list+0x7f) [0x80d311f] > 3:claws-mail() [0x80dc881] > 4:claws-mail() [0x80dd017] > 5:claws-mail(gtk_sctree_insert_gnode+0x136) [0x828f386] > 6:claws-mail(gtk_sctree_insert_gnode+0x1f7) [0x828f447] > 7:claws-mail(gtk_sctree_insert_gnode+0x1f7) [0x828f447] > 8:claws-mail(folderview_set+0x25c) [0x80df4bc] > 9:claws-mail() [0x80df701] > 10: claws-mail() [0x822de41] > 11: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_hook_list_marshal+0x67) > [0xb6a7f847] > 12: claws-mail(hooks_invoke+0x64) [0x822e554] > 13: claws-mail(folder_add+0xc1) [0x80cc151] > 14: claws-mail(folder_read_list+0x79) [0x80d0959] > 15: claws-mail(main+0xc65) [0x80839d5] > 16: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf6) [0xb6191276] > 17: claws-mail() [0x80857ea] > > msgcache.c:586 Condition cache_file != NULL failed > traceback: > 0:claws-mail(msgcache_read_cache+0xd7b) [0x812e3cb] > 1:claws-mail() [0x80d2783] > 2:claws-mail(folder_item_get_msg_list+0x7f) [0x80d311f] > 3:claws-mail() [0x80dc881] > 4:claws-mail() [0x80dd017] > 5:claws-mail(gtk_sctree_insert_gnode+0x136) [0x828f386] > 6:claws-mail(gtk_sctree_insert_gnode+0x1f7) [0x828f447] > 7:claws-mail(gtk_sctree_insert_gnode+0x1f7) [0x828f447] > 8:claws-mail(folderview_set+0x25c) [0x80df4bc] > 9:claws-mail() [0x80df701] > 10: claws-mail() [0x822de41] > 11: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_hook_list_marshal+0x67) > [0xb6a7f847] > 12: claws-mail(hooks_invoke+0x64) [0x822e554] > 13: claws-mail(folder_add+0xc1) [0x80cc151] > 14: claws-mail(folder_read_list+0x79) [0x80d0959] > 15: claws-mail(main+0xc65) [0x80839d5] > 16: /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf6) [0xb6191276] > 17: claws-mail() [0x80857ea] > > > (claws-mail:3276): Claws-Mail-CRITICAL **: imap_item_get_path: assertion > 'folder_path != NULL' failed > Segmentation fault > joe@jrenet:~$ Does this crash happen when you start claws-mail from command line? If it does, can you install debug packages¹ and get the backtrace when running inside gdb²? Thanks in advance, ¹ https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages ² http://www.claws-mail.org/faq/index.php/Debugging_Claws -- Ricardo Mones ~ RTFM - "Read The Manual" (The 'F' is silent). Usually a very good idea. Bjarne Stroustrup signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#790199: claws-mail-fancy-plugin depends on libwebkitgtk-1.0-0
Hi Paul, On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 09:29:44AM +0100, Paul wrote: > Hi, > > > claws-mail 3.14.1-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on > > 2017-07-30 > > > > It is affected by these RC bugs: > > 790199: claws-mail: depends on libwebkitgtk-1.0-0 which is > > deprecated > > The claws-mail-fancy-plugin package depends on libwebkitgtk-1.0-0, > not the claws-mail package itself. > > Surely this is some kind of mistake and you meant that the > claws-mail-fancy-plugin package is marked for removal and not the > claws-mail package? No, it's not a mistake: removals are done at the source package level and build dependencies belong to the source package, not to the binary package which introduces it. To exclude a binary package it must be removed from source's control file by a new upload. Since removal of claws-mail doesn't look like a good idea this is probably what I'm going to do sooner or later, unless any of the other alternatives already mentioned¹ do happen first. best regards, ¹ https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=790199#10 -- Ricardo Mones ~ bash: ./signature: No such file or directory /bin/bash signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#775360: Trivial DoS attack vector against p0f service
Package: p0f Followup-For: Bug #775360 Hi Pierre, This RC bug has been open form more than 1.5 years without any response or even forwarding it upstream. Are you still maintaining p0f package? Thanks in advance, -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.5 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Bug#821375: claws-mail-themes: Skypilot-Clawssic is non-free
Package: claws-mail-themes Severity: serious Tags: upstream Justification: Policy 2.3 Hi, In upstream bug 3640¹ it has been reported that the original theme from which Skypilot_Clawssic Claws Mail theme is derived is not allowed to be modified among other things²: ,-- | REF: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/12773 | This is an unauthorized port of the theme. The author simply disregarded | the license contained in the theme file: | | "The original artwork may not be redistributed, or used for any other | purpose without the expressed permission of the author. The original | artwork is not covered by any open-source license and cannot be | distributed under such license. In addition, this package may not be | modified and re-released under its name at any time." | | Anyone know how I can contact the AMO folks to have theme remove it? | | -- | Sailfish - Netscape/Mozilla Champion | Netscape/Mozilla Tips: http://www.ufaq.org/ , http://ilias.ca/ | Rare Mozilla Stuff: http://www.projectit.com/ `-- Hence, this theme should be removed from Debian (and probably upstream). regards, ¹ http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3640 ² https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.themes/Ois-_dWv79Y -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.4 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Bug#803033: catdoc: non-free Unicode files
Hi Olly, On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:50:44 +1300 Olly Betts <o...@survex.com> wrote: > Not sure if I currently have the time to commit to be that new > maintainer, though I'd certainly be happy to do a QA upload to fix the > non-free files and any bugs with a good patch attached. You can try ;-) it's orphaned now, see bug #805507 thanks in advance, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Here I am at the flea market but nobody is buying my urine sample bottles ...» pgpDjHtKFqm9K.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#789121: segfaults in libc6 when accessing ssl keys and signatures
Control: severity 789121 important Hi Andrea, On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:31:33AM +0200, Andrea Lusuardi wrote: Package: claws-mail Version: 3.11.1-3 Severity: grave This severity is not correct with current bug info, I've readjusted it to a more suitable value¹. Hi, since latest update claws-mail on my debian sid starts up correctly and i can access emails and even send one, until i try to fetch unread emails from any ssl/tls protected source, it then immediately segfaults. I am attaching some of the final strace output hoping this helps. Thanks and let me know how i can help with the debugging, i have some experience with gdb and related. Great, then please try to get a proper backtrace with gdb. You can read upstream's page for help on debugging, which also includes specifics for Debian: http://www.claws-mail.org/faq/index.php/Debugging_Claws thanks in advance, ¹ https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html#severities -- Ricardo Mones ~ Never send a human to do a machine's job. Agent Smith signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#783777: python-minimal: fails to upgrade with ImportError: No module named _sysconfigdata_nd
Package: python-minimal
Version: 2.7.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
Hi all,
When upgrading a sid chroot (host runs testing) it failed with the
following:
…
Setting up python-minimal (2.7.9-1) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 563, in module
main()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 545, in main
known_paths = addusersitepackages(known_paths)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 272, in addusersitepackages
user_site = getusersitepackages()
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 247, in getusersitepackages
user_base = getuserbase() # this will also set USER_BASE
File /usr/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 237, in getuserbase
USER_BASE = get_config_var('userbase')
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py, line 582, in get_config_var
return get_config_vars().get(name)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py, line 528, in get_config_vars
_init_posix(_CONFIG_VARS)
File /usr/lib/python2.7/sysconfig.py, line 412, in _init_posix
from _sysconfigdata import build_time_vars
File /usr/lib/python2.7/_sysconfigdata.py, line 6, in module
from _sysconfigdata_nd import *
ImportError: No module named _sysconfigdata_nd
dpkg: error processing package python-minimal (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
status 1
…
Looks like some dependency on that module is missing, but I may be
wrong, since I don't know much about python ecosystem.
thanks in advance,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages python-minimal depends on:
ii dpkg 1.17.25
ii python2.7-minimal 2.7.9-2
Versions of packages python-minimal recommends:
ii python 2.7.9-1
python-minimal suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#773036: libetpan-dbg: unhandled symlink to directory conversion: /usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
Hi Vincent! On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 01:56:32AM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi Ricardo, I've attached a full debdiff (in the form of a NMU), which I haven't uploaded yet (but I'm happy to upload this if you have no objections). As for how to test it, well, I'm not an expert when it comes to piuparts, but I was able to reproduce the original error with: # piuparts -m 'http://ftp.debian.org/debian/' -a -d wheezy -d sid libetpan-dbg After applying the attached debdiff and building libetpan, you can use the following pbuilder invocation to check your package (I guess you can ignore the debsums-related error that piuparts spits out): # piuparts -m 'http://ftp.debian.org/debian/' -d wheezy -d sid libetpan_1.5-1.1_amd64.changes Many thanks for the patch! I've just adapted it for a regular upload and is now in the archive. Piuparts command succeeds with the debsums errors you mentioned, so all seems fine. Thanks again to all and happy new year, -- Ricardo Mones ~ The three principal virtues of a programmer are Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris.man perl signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#773036: Debdiff
Control: tags -1 help
Hi all,
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:24:01 +0100
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org wrote:
libetpan-dev has the same problems as libetpan-dbg and needs to be
fixed, too.
On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 20:26:48 + bastien ROUCARIES
roucaries.bast...@gmail.com wrote:
The following unstested patch should work
not quite ...
diff -Nru libetpan-1.5/debian/changelog libetpan-1.5/debian/changelog
--- libetpan-1.5/debian/changelog 2014-06-11 18:38:34.0
+0200 +++ libetpan-1.5/debian/changelog 2014-12-13
20:13:37.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libetpan (1.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix symlink to dir problem introduced in 1.4.1-1 (Closes: #773033).
+
+ -- Bastien Roucariès roucaries.bastien+deb...@gmail.com Sat, 13 Dec
2014 20:13:31 +0100
+
libetpan (1.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release: not really, identical to 1.4.1 but version
diff -Nru libetpan-1.5/debian/control libetpan-1.5/debian/control
--- libetpan-1.5/debian/control 2014-06-11 18:38:34.0
+0200 +++ libetpan-1.5/debian/control 2014-12-13
20:15:38.0 +0100 @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@
Multi-Arch: same
Priority: extra
Depends: libetpan17 (= ${binary:Version}), ${misc:Depends}
+Pre-Depends: dpkg (= 1.17.5)
Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}
if you use .maintscript files, see below
Description: debugging symbols for libetpan
libEtPan! is a mail library. It may be used for low-level mail
handling: network protocols (IMAP/NNTP/POP3/SMTP over TCP/IP with or
without SSL), diff -Nru libetpan-1.5/debian/libetpan-dbg.postinst
libetpan-1.5/debian/libetpan-dbg.postinst
--- libetpan-1.5/debian/libetpan-dbg.postinst 1970-01-01
01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ libetpan-1.5/debian/libetpan-dbg.postinst 2014-12-13
20:24:23.0 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+set -e
+
+dpkg-maintscript-helper symlink_to_dir \
+ /usr/share/doc/libetpan-dbg/ /usr/share/doc/libetpan15/
1.5-2~ -- $@
+
+#DEBHELPER#
The trailing slashes (at least the first one) make the call useless -
it's not the symlink being tested, but the resolved directory behind it.
For the second it should be sufficient to use the relative path.
This manual code duplication (in 3 maintainer scripts) can be reduced by
using .maintscript files, for libetpan-dbg it could look like this
(completely untested!):
libetpan-dbg.maintscript:
symlink_to_dir /usr/share/doc/libetpan-dbg libetpan15 1.5-2~
First, thanks a lot for looking at this. Fact is I don't have much time at
this moment to be able to fix this, and I've never had to deal with
maintscripts directly, so I feel a bit like I'm going to break something if
I do, specially within the freeze period.
Is there any chance you can submit a complete patch for fixing it?
Second, which I also found scary from your comments: how can this be tested?
Just running piuparts with the new package?
thanks in advance and best regards,
--
Ricardo Mones
http://people.debian.org/~mones
«Some men are all right in their place -- if they only the knew the
right places! -- Mae West»
pgp5TevNZWGnV.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#760631: [claws-mail-fancy-plugin] Plugin is not loaded
Control: forcemerge 760593 760631 Hi Davide, On Sat, 6 Sep 2014 10:35:36 +0200 Davide Governale magellan...@gmail.com wrote: Package: claws-mail-fancy-plugin Version: 3.10.1-3+b1 Severity: grave --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi Ricardo, When i try to load the plugin, claws reports this error: Si è verificato un errore durante il caricamento di fancy.so : /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libwebkitgtk-1.0.so.0: undefined symbol: cairo_gl_surface_get_width this makes it impossible to load. And fancy not work. Kindly, Davide Governale. Already reported and fixed, merging. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «You will be misunderstood by everyone.» pgpK6dzvhxyk7.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#756341: streamtuner2: hangs at 'loading module live365'
Control: fixed -1 streamtuner2/2.1.2-1 On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 02:28:32PM +0900, TANIGUCHI Takaki wrote: Upstream have removed Live365 since 2.1.2. 2.1.2 (2014-07-31) - Listing from the renewed Radionomy Shoutcast has been fixed. - Live365 was disabled. Many thanks for the uploads! I'd recommend you to try closing those bugs using Debian's changelog¹. That way the proper fixed version is recorded in the BTS automatically :) best regards, ¹ https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-bugfix -- Ricardo Mones ~ Don't take the name of root in vain. /usr/src/linux/README signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#756341: streamtuner2: hangs at 'loading module live365'
Package: streamtuner2 Version: 2.1.1-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi maintainer, Just tried to install and use streamtuner2, but I only see a progress bar on top-left corner on screen that doesn't go past the subject's stage. I've waited several minutes but it stays there wasting ~100% cycles of a core, as top shows. Any suggestion appreciated, but as currently this is completely unusable. Best regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages streamtuner2 depends on: ii python-glade2 2.24.0-3+b1 ii python-gtk2 2.24.0-3+b1 ii python-imaging2.5.1-1 ii python-keybinder 0.3.0-3 ii python-lxml 3.3.5-1+b1 ii python-pyquery1.2.4-1 ii python-requests 2.3.0-1 pn python:anynone streamtuner2 recommends no packages. Versions of packages streamtuner2 suggests: pn audacious none ii totem 3.12.1-1 ii vlc2.1.4-1+b3 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#753488: cairo-dock-plug-ins: FTBFS in s390x because of uninstallable build-depend libgnutls-dev
Source: cairo-dock-plug-ins Severity: serious Hi maintainers, Build logs shows subject's problem: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=cairo-dock-plug-ins Switching from libgnutls-dev to libgnutls28-dev in Build-Depends should fix this, though I've not checked it :) best regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#746389: Possible mbox mailbox corruption due to locking technique mismatch
tags 746389 upstream help retitle 746389 mbox locking not NFS-safe forwarded 746389 http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/redmine/issues/202 thanks On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:05:15PM -0400, Celejar wrote: Hi, Don't know if you noticed, but my correspondence (such as it is) with getmail upstream is already copied to the bug report. Yep, I did :) Unfortunately and AFAICS things are worse than just documentation about the locking method: Sylpheed's mbox locking method goes against Debian Policy §11.6 and is not NFS-safe. This is already reported upstream (and forwarding this bug now to it) but there's been no answer so far. I currently don't have time to make a patch before the automatic removal from testing (that will happen in 11 days if this is not fixed), so I'm tagging this help. regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Datei nicht gefunden Fehler 404 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#747813: minidlna: FTBFS against libav10
Hi Benoît, Now that Florian has kindly provided a patch¹, do you have plans to prepare a new package fixing this bug? best regards, ¹ https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=747813#10 -- Ricardo Mones ~ RTFM - Read The Manual (The 'F' is silent). Usually a very good idea. Bjarne Stroustrup signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#746389: Possible mbox mailbox corruption due to locking technique mismatch
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:39:01AM -0400, Celejar wrote: On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:15:10 +0200 Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org wrote: ... Hi, On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:33:58AM -0400, Celejar wrote: Package: sylpheed Version: 3.2.0-1 Severity: grave Sylpheed uses flock(), when available, to lock mbox files on write, while (recent) getmail (for example) defaults to lockf: http://pyropus.ca/software/getmail/configuration.html#destination-mboxrd While getmail, for example, documents this, makes the lock technique configurable, and includes a big fat warning about the possibility of data corruption consequent to file locking technique mismatch, AFAICT Sylpheed does not document its locking method and does not make it configurable, creating a serious possibility of mbox corruption and data loss. The problem I see is that documenting it doesn't prevent the data loss to happen. It only serves to wash hands and say I told you, which is not very helping to somebody which may have just lost a hundred mails. Agreed - I just suggested documentation as a minimum. Yep, understood. Do you know why getmail has change locking method? If there's good reasons maybe Sylpheed upstream can be convinced of changing this too. I don't know, but upstream of both projects are very responsive, so I'll ask. Great, thanks a lot! best regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ 00:45 hammar cool.. have you used rssyl? 00:46 @Ticho um, yesSeen on #sylpheed signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#746389: Possible mbox mailbox corruption due to locking technique mismatch
tags 746389 moreinfo forwarded 746389 http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/redmine/issues/198 thanks Hi, On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:33:58AM -0400, Celejar wrote: Package: sylpheed Version: 3.2.0-1 Severity: grave Sylpheed uses flock(), when available, to lock mbox files on write, while (recent) getmail (for example) defaults to lockf: http://pyropus.ca/software/getmail/configuration.html#destination-mboxrd While getmail, for example, documents this, makes the lock technique configurable, and includes a big fat warning about the possibility of data corruption consequent to file locking technique mismatch, AFAICT Sylpheed does not document its locking method and does not make it configurable, creating a serious possibility of mbox corruption and data loss. The problem I see is that documenting it doesn't prevent the data loss to happen. It only serves to wash hands and say I told you, which is not very helping to somebody which may have just lost a hundred mails. Do you know why getmail has change locking method? If there's good reasons maybe Sylpheed upstream can be convinced of changing this too. regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Quantity derives from measurement, figures from quantities, comparisons from figures, and victories from comparisons. Sun Tzu signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#746101: claws-mail: FTBFS: dh_install: claws-mail-gdata-plugin missing files (usr/lib/*/claws-mail/plugins/gdata.so), aborting
Hi David, On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:32:03PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: Source: claws-mail Version: 3.9.3-2 Severity: serious Tags: jessie sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140426 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): make[4]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make[4]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make[3]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make[2]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make[1]: Leaving directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»' dh_install -O--parallel dh_install: claws-mail-gdata-plugin missing files (usr/lib/*/claws-mail/plugins/gdata.so), aborting make: *** [binary] Error 2 The full build log is available from: http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2014/04/26/claws-mail_3.9.3-2_unstable.log From the build log: … checking for GDATA... no checking for GDATA... no checking for GDATA... no … configure: WARNING: Plugin gdata will not be built; missing libgdata … So it's clear it failed because the plugin was not build. From the configure.ac in sources: … PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GDATA, libgdata = 0.9.1, HAVE_GDATA=yes, HAVE_GDATA=no) … And similar ones for lower versions, which seems pretty standard. This has not changed for ages, so unlikely the cause. From the build log again: … Setting up libgdata-common (0.15.0-2) ... Setting up libgdata19 (0.15.0-2) ... Setting up gir1.2-gdata-0.0 (0.15.0-2) ... … But from the libgdata changelog¹, seems something was forgotten in -2 and -3 was uploaded a few hours later: … libgdata (0.15.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/control.in: + Let libgdata-dev depend on libjson-glib-dev as required by the pkg-config file. -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org Sat, 26 Apr 2014 21:41:35 +0200 libgdata (0.15.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Force build against the new goa. * Upload to unstable. -- Emilio Pozuelo Monfort po...@debian.org Sat, 26 Apr 2014 13:04:08 +0200 … Tried to build with -3 and the gdata plugin got build, so I guess the problem is already fixed. Is it possible to launch a rebuild to verify this is correct? Thanks, ¹ http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/libg/libgdata/unstable_changelog -- Ricardo Mones ~ Never send a human to do a machine's job. Agent Smith signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#746101: claws-mail: FTBFS: dh_install: claws-mail-gdata-plugin missing files (usr/lib/*/claws-mail/plugins/gdata.so), aborting
reopen 746101 reassign 746101 libgdata-dev found 746101 libgdata/0.15.0-2 fixed 746101 libgdata/0.15.0-3 close 746101 thanks On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 07:39:44PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: Hi Ricardo, El Lunes, 28 de abril de 2014 12:57:53 Ricardo Mones escribió: Tried to build with -3 and the gdata plugin got build, so I guess the problem is already fixed. Is it possible to launch a rebuild to verify this is correct? Yep, you are right. Closing it then. Sorry for your time :) No problem :) reassigning bug to correct package and versions. Thanks for reporting, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Never send a human to do a machine's job. Agent Smith signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#743749: sylpheed: mails lost when mailbox not accessible
Package: sylpheed Version: 3.4.0-1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: causes data loss This is for preventing migration of current unstable version to testing because of bug http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/redmine/issues/193 Upstream already released 3.4.1 to address this, which will be packaged ASAP. -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#740506: libetpan: needs update for db5.3
Hi Hideki, On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 09:14:37AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: control: tags -1 fixed-upstream patch pending On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 13:50:35 +0100 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: db5.1 is being replaced by 5.3, but libetpan doesn't seem to want to build against the latter (configure checks for a list of versions explicitly, not including 5.3, and chooses 5.1 if it finds it before it checks for the unversioned libdb.so). It's just because upstream doesn't know about 5.3, I've pull requested it to upstream and merged. see https://github.com/dinhviethoa/libetpan/pull/115 So I'll upload updated package to 10-days delayed queue. $ LANG=C dpkg --info ../build/libetpan16_1.1-2.1_amd64.deb (snip) Version: 1.1-2.1 Architecture: amd64 Maintainer: Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org Installed-Size: 875 Depends: libc6 (= 2.15), libcurl3-gnutls (= 7.16.2), libdb5.3, libexpat1 (= 2.0.1), libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1), libgcrypt11 (= 1.4.5), libgnutls26 (= 2.12.17-0), libgpg-error0 (= 1.10), liblockfile1 (= 1.0), libsasl2-2, libstdc++6 (= 4.1.1), zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4) Section: libs (snip) NMU package depends to libdb5.3 :) Nice, thanks! But, shouldn't this be uploaded to unstable? Also, upstream has already shipped version 1.3pre2, we should update our package version before jessie release, IMHO. Well, no problem with this, of course :) Pinged you on irc, but got no response, so here I go again: Are you interested on helping with libetpan maintenance? I'm planning to move yoush git repo to collab-maint (already talked with him and he agreed), but have no experience with gbp, and not much time to take care of libetpan itself, so any help is welcome. regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Carl Sagan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#732650: Please remove t1lib dependency
Control: tags -1 +pending On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:03:25PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: Control: tags -1 +patch Hi, Claws-mail seems to not use t1lib, IMO. Not include headers, no configures for it. And also it can be built and just work without t1lib, on my environment. (GNOME sid, amd64) Could you build your package with attached patch and check its behavior, please? Already checked, but forgot completely about uploading... Apologies for the delay. -- Ricardo Mones ~ Datei nicht gefunden Fehler 404 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#735116: apt-listbugs: […]/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to load -- debian_version (LoadError)
Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.12 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Since last update apt-listbugs doesn't allow to apt-get to install packages, it always ends like this: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to load -- debian_version (LoadError) from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24 from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:289:in `require' from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:289 E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt returned an error code (1) E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt At first thought about #733140, but ruby-gettext is already at a supposedly good version, so it must be missing anything else. Thanks in advance for any suggestion, -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages apt-listbugs depends on: ii apt 0.9.14.2 ii ruby-debian 0.3.8+b2 ii ruby-gettext3.0.3-1 ii ruby-httpclient 2.3.3-2 ii ruby-soap4r 2.0.5-3 ii ruby-xmlparser 0.7.2-2 ii ruby1.8 [ruby-interpreter] 1.8.7.358-9 apt-listbugs recommends no packages. Versions of packages apt-listbugs suggests: ii chromium [www-browser] 31.0.1650.63-1 ii debianutils 4.4 ii iceweasel [www-browser] 17.0.8esr-2 ii konqueror [www-browser] 4:4.11.3-1 ii lynx-cur [www-browser] 2.8.8pre1-1 ii reportbug6.4.4 ii w3m [www-browser]0.5.3-12 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#735116: apt-listbugs: […]/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to load -- debian_version (LoadError)
Hello Francesco et al, On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 10:13:43PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: […] On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:52:40 +0100 Ricardo Mones wrote: Package: apt-listbugs Version: 0.1.12 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, Hello Ricardo, thanks for reporting the issue, which is, however, already known. Apologies for not setting an appropriate affects apt-listbugs for the previously reassigned bug reports. I am doing so now, so that these reports will show up in http://bugs.debian.org/apt-listbugs Thanks, no problem :) Since last update apt-listbugs doesn't allow to apt-get to install packages, it always ends like this: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to load -- debian_version (LoadError) from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24 from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:289:in `require' from /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:289 E: Sub-process /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt returned an error code (1) E: Failure running script /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt [...] Thanks in advance for any suggestion, [...] ii ruby1.8 [ruby-interpreter] 1.8.7.358-9 You are still using ruby1.8 as system-wide default Ruby interpreter. You should switch to ruby1.9.1 as default interpreter. Well, I have what it's pulled by apt-listbugs dependencies, which IMO should be able to pull the version of the interpreter necessary to run it, even if that includes switching default ruby. The following steps should hopefully fix the issue for you: […] At this point you should be again able to upgrade or install packages while using apt-listbugs. Please let me know, if something went wrong. Workaround worked fine, many thanks for the quick response. best regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.Unknown signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#708004: claws-mail: FTBFS with perl 5.18: POD errors
tags 708004 pending thanks Hi Dominic, On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 03:49:53PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: [...] And thanks for the upload - however it still seems to have errors: [...] The attached patch fixes it for me. Please could you apply this patch to the Debian package? If you would prefer me to NMU, I can do that too. Please let me know. Please note that this bug will soon become RC in the preparation for the perl 5.18 transition. Thanks for the patch! A fixed package will be uploaded soon. best regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Carl Sagan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#711544: claws-mail FTBFS, fails to find python shared library.
tags 711544 fixed-upstream pending thanks On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:09:55 +0100 peter green peter.gr...@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk wrote: Package: claws-mail Version: 3.9.1-1 Severity: serious Claws-mail seems to be having trouble finding the python shared library. Yep, it's already fixed upstream¹, will be in Debian soon, as an upstream bugfix release is planned in a few days. thanks for reporting, ¹http://git.claws-mail.org/?p=claws.git;a=commitdiff;h=df8a1d7e766dea1c48a47d6a7766e20922a78cab -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Your present plans will be successful.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#690151: Stable upload request - Fw: Bug#690151: claws-mail: CVE-2012-4507
On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 12:43:02 + Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 20:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 20:08 +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: As requested by Jonathan, I've prepared an upload with the minimal changes required for fixing this, debdiff attached. [...] In any case, please go ahead; thanks. Flagged for acceptance in to p-u. Thanks! best regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Tonight you will pay the wages of sin; Don't forget to leave a tip.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#690151: Stable upload request - Fw: Bug#690151: claws-mail: CVE-2012-4507
Hi release team, As requested by Jonathan, I've prepared an upload with the minimal changes required for fixing this, debdiff attached. IIRC this is the first time I'm going to upload something to stable, so, before uploading, any hints on missing bits or common pitfalls awaiting would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, --- Begin forwarded message: Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:42:13 - From: Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org To: 690...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#690151: claws-mail: CVE-2012-4507 Package: claws-mail Dear maintainer, Recently you fixed one or more security problems and as a result you closed this bug. These problems were not serious enough for a Debian Security Advisory, so they are now on my radar for fixing in the following suites through point releases: squeeze (6.0.7) - use target stable Please prepare a minimal-changes upload targetting each of these suites, and submit a debdiff to the Release Team [0] for consideration. They will offer additional guidance or instruct you to upload your package. I will happily assist you at any stage if the patch is straightforward and you need help. Please keep me in CC at all times so I can track [1] the progress of this request. For details of this process and the rationale, please see the original announcement [2] and my blog post [3]. 0: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org 1: http://prsc.debian.net/tracker/690151/ 2: 201101232332.11736.th...@debian.org 3: http://deb.li/prsc Thanks, with his security hat on: -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 --- End forwarded message. -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Alimony and bribes will engage a large share of your wealth.» diff -Nru claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/changelog claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/changelog --- claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/changelog 2010-10-13 16:36:26.0 +0200 +++ claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/changelog 2013-01-18 19:25:19.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +claws-mail (3.7.6-4+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low + + * patches/99_fix_CVE-2012-4507.patch + - Added fix for CVE-2012-4507 from 3.8.1-2 (Closes: #690151) + + -- Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:03:36 +0100 + claws-mail (3.7.6-4) unstable; urgency=low * debian/rules, debian/claws-mail-doc.dirs diff -Nru claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/patches/99_fix_CVE-2012-4507.patch claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/patches/99_fix_CVE-2012-4507.patch --- claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/patches/99_fix_CVE-2012-4507.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/patches/99_fix_CVE-2012-4507.patch 2013-01-18 19:25:19.0 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +Subject: fix for CVE-2012-4507 +From: Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com +Bug: http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2743 +Bug-RedHat: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/862578 +Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/690151 +Applied-Upstream: 3.8.1cvs82 + +diff -purN claws-mail-3.8.1.orig/src/procmime.c claws-mail-3.8.1/src/procmime.c +--- claws-mail-3.8.1.orig/src/procmime.c 2012-06-27 11:05:22.0 +0200 claws-mail-3.8.1/src/procmime.c 2012-10-11 18:40:13.0 +0200 +@@ -1753,6 +1753,8 @@ static void parse_parameters(const gchar + continue; + + charset = value; ++ if (charset == NULL) ++ continue; + lang = strchr(charset, '\''); + if (lang == NULL) + continue; diff -Nru claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/patches/series claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/patches/series --- claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/patches/series 2009-07-03 15:27:51.0 +0200 +++ claws-mail-3.7.6/debian/patches/series 2013-01-18 19:25:19.0 +0100 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ 11mark_trashed_as_read.patch 12fix_manpage_header.patch +99_fix_CVE-2012-4507.patch signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#690151: claws-mail: CVE-2012-4507
tags 690151 confirmed fixed-upstream pending thanks Hi Moritz, On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:24:52PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Package: claws-mail Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Please see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862578 for details and a patch. Yeah, I commited the fix upstream, tagging accordingly. Since we're in freeze, please upload a minimal fix to unstable and request an unblock. There's some other minimal fixes in the oven, without CVE, this one will be added (was planned anyway). regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Carl Sagan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#678644: Upstream request: new upload or remove from archive (security reasons)
Package: zoph Followup-For: Bug #678644 Hi, FWIW zoph is orphaned now, feel free to adopt it: http://bugs.debian.org/679417 regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#638244: What is the situation of the picard package?
Hi Adam, On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:05:09PM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote: Hi, This package is really lagging after upstream (current Debian package: 0.11-2.1+b1, current upstream 0.16 at least). The packaged version has a lot of problems that have been fixed upstream. #554528 is a wishbug for the new upstream, tagged pending by the maintainer (without any message) on 16 Mar 2010, with several people that, at one time or another, made the work to upgrade the package, some of them even talked about hijacking the package. However, the current maintainer only add the tag pending and write *one* message about a problem in icon licensing, problem that seems to be fixed for nearly one year according to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554528#59 For myself, I used the packaging done by sebastien.villemot to upgrade to 0.16 (for interested users, you can find the source package and the binary for amd64 on my private repo, see my signature). Note that this version compiles correctly with libav. So the serious bug #638244 seems to have been handled upstream. I would really welcome some inputs from the maintainer. Is it MIA? Does he still take care of this package? Should he add a RFH? Or should he co-maintain this package within the pkg-multimedia team? ... We, the MIA team, would like to know if there's real chances of this stagnation to be fixed on your side as soon as this week, as it seems not much has happened since René contacted you back in June. Otherwise it's better just to orphan the package and/or put it under team maintenance as Vincent suggests. If you cannot do it, please let us know, and we will take care of orphaning (we'll do anyway if you don't answer before next weekend). regards and thanks for your work, -- Ricardo Mones, on behalf of the Debian/QA MIA team ~ Never send a human to do a machine's job. Agent Smith signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#618048: rlplot: FTBFS: QT_Spec.cpp:1190:16: error: call of overloaded 'QString(int)' is ambiguous
Hi James, Thanks Olly for noticing this and sorry for the late response, On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:05:24PM +1300, Olly Betts wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 05:54:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: rlplot Version: 1.4-1 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20110313 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This release-critical bug has seen no maintainer response in over 8 months. The last rlplot upload was over 4 years ago (in 2007) and the last response to a bug report by the maintainer seems to also have be in 2007. Meanwhile there's been a newer upstream release, which has been packaged for Ubuntu but is not available in Debian. James: Are you still interested in maintaining this package? If not, it would be better to orphan it, so that somebody else interested in it can take over maintenance. In addition to Olly's question, and as nothing has been received to his previous query, if no response is received I will orphan this package next weekend, so please let us know your intentions. regards, -- Ricardo Mones, on behalf of Debian/QA MIA Team ~ Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Carl Sagan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#646237: Patch
Heya Gustavo, Sorry, couldn't answer before... On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:20:14 -0200 Gustavo Noronha Silva k...@debian.org wrote: Hey, On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 13:01 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: I guess that means a final upload of 1.6.1 is in order to add a Breaks for midori and claws fancy with the appropriate versions, and I'll be done with this =) Would be nice to have this done asap. I'll do it tonight if we can figure out the version number the new upload will have =) The claws-mail-extra-plugins will be 3.7.10-3, and I planned to upload it today (though still will take some hours before it can be done and I may need an sponsor in case my key update still isn't merged in the keyring) with the upstream patch instead (attached). Please have a look in case you see something wrong in it. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Every cloud engenders not a storm. -- William Shakespeare, Henry VI» 0.9.14cvs1.patchset Description: Binary data signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#646237: Patch
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 18:23:04 +0100 Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org wrote: Heya Gustavo, Sorry, couldn't answer before... On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:20:14 -0200 Gustavo Noronha Silva k...@debian.org wrote: Hey, On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 13:01 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: I guess that means a final upload of 1.6.1 is in order to add a Breaks for midori and claws fancy with the appropriate versions, and I'll be done with this =) Would be nice to have this done asap. I'll do it tonight if we can figure out the version number the new upload will have =) The claws-mail-extra-plugins will be 3.7.10-3, and I planned to upload it today (though still will take some hours before it can be done and I may need an sponsor in case my key update still isn't merged in the keyring) with the upstream patch instead (attached). Please have a look in case you see something wrong in it. As suspected my key update remains unmerged and the upload has been rejected, so I need an sponsor, like in the old times ;-) I've uploaded the packages here: http://hydra.debian.net/mones/ thanks in adcance, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «I think we are in Rats' Alley where the dead men lost their bones. -- T.S. Eliot» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#646237: Patch
tags 646237 fixed-upstream pending thanks Heya Gustavo! On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:17:33 -0200 Gustavo Noronha Silva k...@debian.org wrote: Here's a patch for this issue! I noticed, though, that this functionality (search the web) doesn't seem to be available, and the function doesn't seem to be used anywhere, so might be a candidate for removal, even? In any case, this replaces the code that uses private API by supported, public API, and bumps the dependency in configure.ac. Well, it's a little embarrassing but seems the bug was already fixed upstream since some time ago but my forwarded report wasn't marked as duplicated until today :/ I completely overlooked this was an already reported bug upstream so happily created a new one instead. I'm very sorry for making you work in a patch which won't be useful, I hope it was somewhat fun at least. my apologies and best regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Avert misunderstanding by calm, poise, and balance.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#646426: fancy.so: undefined symbol: webkit_web_view_get_selected_text
forcemerge 646237 646426 thanks On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:01:13 +0300 Teodor mteo...@gmail.com wrote: When I try to load 'fancy.so' plugin, it gives this error: | The following error occurred while loading fancy.so : | | /usr/lib/claws-mail/plugins/fancy.so: undefined | symbol: webkit_web_view_get_selected_text Already reported, merging bugs. -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Q: Why did the germ cross the microscope? A: To get to the other slide.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#646095: Usage of private symbol
Hi Gustavo, On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:12:52 -0200 Gustavo Noronha Silva k...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 10:45 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: On ven., 2011-10-21 at 23:01 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: Anyway, let's see the upstream call on that. https://bugs.launchpad.net/midori/+bug/799603/comments/16 and I'm not knowledgeable enough to remove the guard and the “else” part. One thing I can do is add a versioned build-dep for future version but that won't really help for the current versions. With this last upload (1.6.1-4) I think I managed to deal with all the FTBFS problems that would hold webkit, so we're left with this one to be handled. Options I see: * Re-add the API in question in the Debian package as a way to give claws-mail-fancy-plugin time to react * Fix claws-mail-fancy-plugin now to use the DOM APIs instead, like midori does, and add appropriate Breaks: for midori and claws-mail-fancy-plugin * Go shopping instead Votes? I'll grab claws-mail-fancy-plugin's code to take a look. Bug of fancy-plugin has already been forwarded upstream, but no reaction so far, so feel free provide a patch. thanks in advance, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Stay away from hurricanes for a while.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#646237: claws-mail-fancy-plugin: undefined symbol: webkit_web_view_get_selected_text
forwarded 646237 http://www.thewildbeast.co.uk/claws-mail/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2527 thanks On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 16:00:14 +0200 Laurent Bigonville bi...@debian.org wrote: Package: claws-mail-fancy-plugin Version: 3.7.10-2+b1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Hi, It seems that the fancy plugin is using a private function that has been removed in the last (1.6) upload. More information: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62512 Thanks for the report, forwarding upstream. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «So this is it. We're going to die.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#644582: [claws-mail-python-plugin] depends on different python versions
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:06:30PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org, 2011-10-14, 11:57:
The only fix I can figure out now is replacing the python-dev
dependency of the by a pythonX.Y-dev dependency generated at build
time. Better ideas welcome, of course.
How about this patch? (Untested, sorry.)
Well, thanks for the patch! I'm not that knowledgeable about python to see
what could be wrong in it, so I have to fully trust you. I have no problem with
that either :)
I've rebuilt the source package with your changes and seems to work as well
as previously, which is not much in my case because I've noticed it has
suffered also a binNMU, and it's now at 3.7.10-2+b1 version (bug was reported
for 3.7.10-2). Not sure which caused that as the release team hasn't answered
my original request, but now that we have it, I think the original reporter can
check if the current version fixes the problem, and afterwards, if not fixed,
upload a new version with your patch. Sounds that ok?
Anyway, going back to the patch, then I guess gtkparasite (also in the
archive) would be affected by the same problem, as it's where the patched line
originates [0]. It's code is used in the claws-mail-python-plugin to get the
python console. Don't you think?
best regards,
[0] https://github.com/chipx86/gtkparasite/blob/master/configure.ac#L78
+Description: Don't dlopen libpython2.X.so symlink.
+ Don't dlopen libpython2.X.so symlink, but the real file it's pointing to.
+ Python libraries never break ABI between major releases, so hardcoding
+ SOVERSION is safe here.
+Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/644582
+Author: Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org
+Last-Update: 2011-10-14
+
+--- a/python_plugin-0.8/configure.ac
b/python_plugin-0.8/configure.ac
+@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@
+ fi
+
+ # libpython.so
+-PYTHON_SHARED_LIB=libpython${PYTHON_VERSION}.so
++PYTHON_SHARED_LIB=libpython${PYTHON_VERSION}.so.1
+ found_libpython_so=no
+ if test -f $PYTHON_PREFIX/lib/$PYTHON_SHARED_LIB; then
+ found_libpython_so=yes
--
Ricardo Mones
~
Don't take the name of root in vain. /usr/src/linux/README
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#644582: [claws-mail-python-plugin] depends on different python versions
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 06:36:55PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: severity 644582 serious thanks * Slavko li...@slavino.sk, 2011-10-07, 13:44: i increase the severity, while dependencies are broken and after restart computer (unload old libraries) the claws-mail with python plugin don't start with message: claws-mail ** ERROR **: libpython2.6.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory aborting... I don't know why the plugin is trying to dlopen /usr/lib/libpython2.X.so[0][1], but the dependencies of the package don't ensure that this file actually exist, as shown above. It's trying to dlopen the python library because it provides a python console. The dependencies are supposed to ensure that while you don't change the default python version. [0] The .so symlink it's supposed to be used for building stuff, not at runtime - it's in python2.X-dev after all Yep, the package is depending on python-dev to ensure that. [1] Also, it's the library which the plugin is already (build-time-)linked with... But maybe I'm missing something. Yep, the plugin provides also a python interface to some of the claws-mail internal functions, so it needs this for building. The only fix I can figure out now is replacing the python-dev dependency of the by a pythonX.Y-dev dependency generated at build time. Better ideas welcome, of course. thanks, -- Ricardo Mones ~ RTFM - Read The Manual (The 'F' is silent). Usually a very good idea. Bjarne Stroustrup signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#642303: xpaint: license restricts selling (DFSG #1)
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:51:49PM -0600, Josue Abarca wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:41:22PM +0200, Ricardo Mones wrote: Package: xpaint Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1.1 Hi maintainer, Some of the xpaint files fall under the following license [0] clause: Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted. IOW, because the and the permission is only valid when you don't apply any fee, thus forbidding effectively selling any Debian CD with xpaint (for example). I'd suggest contacting upstream and try they reword this paragraph into something like ... for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted. regards, [0] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/x/xpaint/xpaint_2.9.1.4-3/xpaint.copyright Hello, thanks for the report. This seems to be a very common License clause in Debian[0][1] ... [7]. Indeed, unfortunately. Please take a look to this thread in debian-legal@l.d.o: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/1999/08/msg00047.html from that thread: It means without a fee (royalty) to the author (copyright holder). Well, didn't know that thread and is a good one. Nevertheless from that thread it's also clear that it's ambiguous and not really desirable... I will change the severity to wishlist and try to get a clarification (by email) from the copyright holder in order to improve the debian/copyright file. ...so, I guess that's the way to go, thanks :) -- Ricardo Mones ~ Never send a human to do a machine's job. Agent Smith signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#642303: xpaint: license restricts selling (DFSG #1)
Package: xpaint Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.1.1 Hi maintainer, Some of the xpaint files fall under the following license [0] clause: Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted. IOW, because the and the permission is only valid when you don't apply any fee, thus forbidding effectively selling any Debian CD with xpaint (for example). I'd suggest contacting upstream and try they reword this paragraph into something like ... for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted. regards, [0] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/x/xpaint/xpaint_2.9.1.4-3/xpaint.copyright -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#633854: [ember] Update or remove
Hi Michael, I hope everything goes well, but we're concerned about the status of some of your packages in Debian. I've uploaded the latest NMU for ember (prepared by Etienne Millon) and nothing has happened with it since then, except that now it has 2 RC bugs. I understand life gets complicated so, if you don't answer this in the next week or so I will orphan ember so others can take care and, if nobody does after some time, request its removal. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Your goose is cooked. (Your current chick is burned up too!)» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#622580: sylpheed: FTBFS for +b1: /usr/bin/ld: compose.o: undefined reference to symbol 'enchant_broker_list_dicts'
tags 622580 fixed-upstream thanks Hi KiBi, On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:09:53AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Source: sylpheed Version: 3.1.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, your package FTBFS for its +b1 binNMU round with: [...] | /usr/bin/ld: compose.o: undefined reference to symbol 'enchant_broker_list_dicts' | /usr/bin/ld: note: 'enchant_broker_list_dicts' is defined in DSO //usr/lib/libenchant.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line | //usr/lib/libenchant.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status | make[5]: *** [sylpheed] Error 1 Yep, already known and submitted the patch upstream [0]. Patch is already on current trunk, just waiting for some release to happen. thanks, [0] http://www.sraoss.jp/pipermail/sylpheed/2011-March/004459.html -- Ricardo Mones ~ Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Carl Sagan signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#569540: status of your package potamus
Hi maintainer, More than 10 months have passed since this RC bug has been filed without response on your side, and there's new upstream versions which have not been packaged. Life is complicated and I understand you may have lost interest or don't have time to maintain this package. In that case, please tell me if you have plans to work on this or not. If no response is received from you (please keep Cc on answers) I will orphan this package in a week, so others can take care. thanks and best regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «A visit to a fresh place will bring strange work.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#580017: osmo uses gtkhtml2
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:21:52PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le mercredi 16 juin 2010 à 13:02 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : I uploaded the package built with squeeze to mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osmo - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osmo/osmo_0.2.10+svn898-1.dsc For comparison, the logs of the builds in sid and squeeze are attached. One further difference is, that sh is used as shell in sid, whereas bash is used in squeeze (according to the generated makefiles). Do you have any idea what might cause this build failure? Thanks a lot for your help, The dash change has been reverted in sid, so this should build again. Can Ricardo or one of the gnome guys sponsor Eike's package? Done. I had to rebuild the orig.tar.gz from the upstream repository. You were faster, thanks :) -- Ricardo Mones ~ Don't take the name of root in vain. /usr/src/linux/README signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#552829: uploaded
Hi Yavor, I've checked you NMU of mpc123 package for sponsoring and uploaded it. thanks for you work and best regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Q: How did you get into artificial intelligence? A: Seemed logical -- I didn't have any real intelligence.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#571387: claws-mail-extra-plugins: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/liblzma.la' is not a valid libtool archive
Hi Lucas, On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:26:10 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote: Source: claws-mail-extra-plugins Version: 3.7.5-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-02-24 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Seems the bug blocking this one has been solved, time to close it? -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «You will be recognized and honored as a community leader.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#568805: ERROR: Extension has already been added
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 00:52:25 +0100 Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 12:35:06AM +0100, Ricardo Mones wrote: Not sure wether it's harmless or not. I guess it should be probably It is, the extension is registered (but probably the old version). What did the preinst say? Have a full upgrade log? Actually it is not harmless, as I found out now. not a failure in preinst, it's supposed now the state should have become unbroken again? I broke the preinst :/ Ouch! :( sorry to hear that, I hope you get it fixed soon. thanks and best regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier.» -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562362: Info received (boa: simple fix for FTBFS)
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 09:29:32 -0500 François-Denis Gonthier neum...@lostwebsite.net wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org wrote: Hi, I've received no message about this, so I assume you're too busy or uninterested right now, hence, unless you provide an updated package for sponsoring or a notification that you're still working on it, I'll be NMUing this by next week's weekend with the patch I sent previously. It's true I'm less (no longer?) interested in boa right now but I wouldn't feel right not cleaning things up before I RFA or orphan it. Well, that's sad anyway. I was waiting on new developments from upstream about bug 315445. It seems that won't come soon or I was wrong. Maybe some inquiry may motivate upstream? I mean, instead of just waiting. Thanks for doing the NMU. I'll try to find the time to prepare a proper package this week. (I swear). Well, the NMU has not still been done because an unfortunate incident with my key, just caused by my lack of knowledge :). You probably have already seen the mails. I'll try to fix it by contacting some one, or otherwise the time will have to pass. In the mean time I'm neither unable to upload anything, anyway I can help you to find another sponsor when you have the packages ready. Thanks in advance, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Good day to let down old friends who need help.» -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562362: Info received (boa: simple fix for FTBFS)
Hi, I've received no message about this, so I assume you're too busy or uninterested right now, hence, unless you provide an updated package for sponsoring or a notification that you're still working on it, I'll be NMUing this by next week's weekend with the patch I sent previously. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «You will gain money by a fattening action.» -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#562362: boa: simple fix for FTBFS
Package: boa Followup-For: Bug #562362 Hi Francois-Denis, A simple dependency replacement seems to fix this. Patch for NMU attached. If you're already working on this feel free to prepare an updated package and request sponsorship as usually. regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash diff -urN debian/changelog debian.mnu/changelog --- debian/changelog 2009-12-27 21:16:05.0 +0100 +++ debian.mnu/changelog 2009-12-27 21:11:49.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +boa (0.94.14rc21-3.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * debian/control + - Replace non-existing build dependency (Closes: #562362) + + -- Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org Sun, 27 Dec 2009 21:10:39 +0100 + boa (0.94.14rc21-3) unstable; urgency=low * Access log garbled (Closes: #449074) diff -urN debian/control debian.mnu/control --- debian/control 2009-12-27 21:16:05.0 +0100 +++ debian.mnu/control 2009-12-27 21:10:21.0 +0100 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Francois-Denis Gonthier neum...@lostwebsite.net Standards-Version: 3.7.3 -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0), texinfo, bison, flex, texi2html, tetex-bin, po-debconf, quilt +Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0), texinfo, bison, flex, texi2html, texlive-base-bin, po-debconf, quilt Package: boa Architecture: any
Bug#552829: mpc123: FTBFS
Hi maintainer, Seems libmpc has changed the API substantially in latest upload [0], so current mpc123 won't be building unless some rewrite is made. I've seen no response to this bug report for two months, so I wonder if some progress is being done. Is that the case? regards, [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libm/libmpc/news/20091020T183249Z.html -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «You're being followed. Cut out the hanky-panky for a few days.» -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#550184: claws-mail: claws crashes silently
severity 550184 important thanks On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:20:09 +0100 sebI levI levi.vi...@gmail.com wrote: Package: claws-mail Version: 3.7.2-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Please read what severities mean before changing it from normal: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities trying to switch to claws from kmail. It was working perfectly fine for a day or two. Now claws crashes as soon as I try to compose email. Nothing shows up in the logs at all. I'm using xfce4. Open a terminal and launch claws-mail --debug 21 debug.log, make it crash and answer this mail with the debug.log file attached (you may gzip it first if too big). Please keep Cc on reply. Also, you can run it under gdb and send the backtrace, see project's help page on debugging [0] for instructions. regards, [0] http://www.claws-mail.org/faq/index.php/Debugging_Claws -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «It's lucky you're going so slowly, because you're going in the wrong direction.» -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#515275: gcrontab: Depends on GTK 1.2 and GLIB 1.2
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:46:18 +0300 Jari Aalto jari.aa...@cante.net wrote: Ack. Being worked on. Cool, though I've received no request for sponsoring, is that ok or did I miss it? (It already happened to me so I prefer to ask...) regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Q: What looks like a cat, flies like a bat, brays like a donkey, and plays like a monkey? A: Nothing.» -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#543037: epiphany: FTBFS: configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in . ./.. ./../.. patch
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 02:22:53 +0100 (BST) m...@funkyhat.org wrote: Patch to adjust symlinks for automake --- epiphany-0.7.0/debian/rules +++ epiphany-0.7.0/debian/rules @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ endif configure-stamp: configure + for i in depcomp install-sh missing ; do ln -sf /usr/share/automake-1.11/$$i $$i ; done dh_testdir CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) ./configure --host=$(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE) \ --build=$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE) \ I think that only works for automake 1.11, but thanks anyway. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Today is the last day of your life so far.» -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#540036: kdewallpapers: The bug is still there for 4.3.0-2
reopen 540036 thanks Hi, Just upgraded to the version which supposedly fixed the bug but seems is still there: Preparing to replace kdewallpapers 4:4.2.4-1 (using .../kdewallpapers_4%3a4.3.0-2_all.deb) ... Unpacking replacement kdewallpapers ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/kdewallpapers_4%3a4.3.0-2_all.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/wallpapers/Blue_Curl/contents/images/1280x800.jpg', which is also in package kdebase-workspace-data dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) Errors were encountered while processing: /var/cache/apt/archives/kdewallpapers_4%3a4.3.0-2_all.deb E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash kdewallpapers depends on no packages. kdewallpapers recommends no packages. Versions of packages kdewallpapers suggests: ii awesome [x-window-man 3.3.2-1highly configurable, next generati ii fvwm [x-window-manage 1:2.5.27.ds-10 F(?) Virtual Window Manager ii icewm [x-window-manag 1.2.37+1.3.4pre2-4 wonderful Win95-OS/2-Motif-like wi ii kwin [x-window-manage 4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-2 the KDE window manager ii metacity [x-window-ma 1:2.26.0-3 lightweight GTK+ window manager ii openbox [x-window-man 3.4.7.2-4 standards compliant, fast, light-w -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#527663: freqtweak: FTBFS: wxchar.h:894: error: expected initializer before 'ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF_3'
tags 527663 unreproducible moreinfo thanks Hi Chris, El Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:47:35 +0100 Chris Lamb la...@debian.org escribió: reopen 527663 = found 527663 0.7.2-1 thanks This looks like #521995 to me. This bug's failure is for 0.7.0, but I cannot reproduce in 0.7.2 (amd64). Could you attach the build log where 0.7.2 fails to build with such error? regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Never send a human to do a machine's job. Agent Smith signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#534092: lxmusic: new version fixes build
Package: lxmusic Followup-For: Bug #534092 Hi again, New upstream version (see http://bugs.debian.org/538319) fixes build of lxmusic, so if you're too busy now to take care I'll prepare a NMU for this package with the new upstream version around next week. Best regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages lxmusic depends on: ii libatk1.0-01.26.0-1 The ATK accessibility toolkit ii libc6 2.9-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcairo2 1.8.8-2 The Cairo 2D vector graphics libra ii libfontconfig1 2.6.0-4 generic font configuration library ii libfreetype6 2.3.9-5 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib ii libglib2.0-0 2.20.4-1 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk2.0-02.16.5-1 The GTK+ graphical user interface ii libpango1.0-0 1.24.3-1 Layout and rendering of internatio ii libxmmsclient- 0.6DrMattDestruction-1+b1 XMMS2 - glib client library ii libxmmsclient5 0.6DrMattDestruction-1+b1 XMMS2 - client library ii xmms2-core 0.6DrMattDestruction-1+b1 XMMS2 - core package lxmusic recommends no packages. lxmusic suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#515275: gcrontab: Depends on GTK 1.2 and GLIB 1.2
Hi Jari, There's a patch to fix this serious bug for long time in BTS, do you have plans to prepare an upload anytime soon? regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «In the first place, God made idiots; this was for practice; then he made school boards. -- Mark Twain» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#503178: crash with FX5200 after dist-upgrade
tags 503178 unreproducible severity 503178 important thanks On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:31:18 +0200 Nico Schottelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just installed nvidia-glx to test the closed source driver. It works - so maybe really an issue in nv. I've tested here as it happens I have a FX5200 like yours: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5200] (rev a1) and found no problem with nv starting X. I used your bug's attached xorg.conf instead mine to avoid differences other than system. This is an amd64 box, not i386, so maybe arch-depending: | -- System Information: | Debian Release: lenny/sid | APT prefers unstable | APT policy: (500, 'unstable') | Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) | | Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) | Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) | Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash | | Versions of packages xserver-xorg-video-nv depends on: | ii libc6 2.7-15 GNU C Library: Shared | libraries ii xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4.2-7 Xorg X server - | core server Attached the startup log with the nv driver. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «I'll burn my books. -- Christopher Marlowe» X.Org X Server 1.4.2 Release Date: 11 June 2008 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: Linux Debian (xorg-server 2:1.4.2-7) Current Operating System: Linux busgosu 2.6.26-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu Oct 9 14:16:53 UTC 2008 x86_64 Build Date: 30 September 2008 03:57:43PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (++) Log file: /home/mones/xorg2.log, Time: Sun Oct 26 11:55:55 2008 (++) Using config file: /home/mones/bug.503178.xorg.conf (==) No Layout section. Using the first Screen section. (**) |--Screen Default Screen (0) (**) | |--Monitor Configured Monitor (==) No device specified for screen Default Screen. Using the first device section listed. (**) | |--Device Configured Video Device (==) |--Input Device Configured Mouse (==) |--Input Device Generic Keyboard (==) The core pointer device wasn't specified explicitly in the layout. Using the first mouse device. (==) The core keyboard device wasn't specified explicitly in the layout. Using the first keyboard device. (==) Automatically adding devices (==) Automatically enabling devices (==) No FontPath specified. Using compiled-in default. (WW) The directory /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic does not exist. Entry deleted from font path. (==) FontPath set to: /usr/share/fonts/X11/misc, /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled, /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/:unscaled, /usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1, /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi, /usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi, /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType (==) RgbPath set to /etc/X11/rgb (==) ModulePath set to /usr/lib/xorg/modules (WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory) (II) No APM support in BIOS or kernel (II) Loader magic: 0x7c31c0 (II) Module ABI versions: X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3 X.Org Video Driver: 2.0 X.Org XInput driver : 2.0 X.Org Server Extension : 0.3 X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5 (II) Loader running on linux (II) LoadModule: pcidata (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules//libpcidata.so (II) Module pcidata: vendor=X.Org Foundation compiled for 1.4.2, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 2.0 (--) using VT number 8 (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1106,3188 card 1043,80a3 rev 01 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1106,b188 card , rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:0a:0: chip 11ab,4320 card 1043,811a rev 13 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:0e:0: chip 10ec,8139 card 10bd,0320 rev 10 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:0f:0: chip 1106,3149 card 1043,80ed rev 80 class 01,04,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:0f:1: chip 1106,0571 card 1043,80ed rev 06 class 01,01,8a hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:10:0: chip 1106,3038 card 1043,80ed rev 81 class 0c,03,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:10:1: chip 1106,3038 card 1043,80ed rev 81 class 0c,03,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:10:2: chip 1106,3038 card 1043,80ed rev 81 class 0c,03,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:10:3: chip 1106,3038 card 1043,80ed rev 81 class 0c,03,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:10:4: chip 1106,3104 card 1043,80ed rev 86 class 0c,03,20 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:11:0: chip 1106,3227 card 1043,80ed rev 00 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:11:5: chip 1106,3059 card 1043,80b0 rev 60 class 04,01,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:11:6: chip 1106,3068 card , rev 80 class 07,80,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:18:0: chip 1022,1100 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:18:1: chip 1022,1101 card , rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:18:2: chip 1022,1102 card
Bug#490528: claws-mail-extra-plugins FTBFS: Package libcurl-dev has no installation candidate
Hi Anibal, On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: claws-mail-extra-plugins Severity: serious Version: 3.5.0-1 Tags: sid Justification: fails to build from source There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of claws-mail-extra-plugins_3.5.0-1 on goetz by sbuild/alpha 99.999 Build started at 20080703-0638 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), quilt, libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev, libclaws-mail-dev (= 3.5.0), flex, bison, libcurl-dev, autotools-dev, pkg-config, libetpan-dev (= 0.52), libperl-dev (= 5.8.0), perl (= 5.8.0), docbook-to-man, libxml2-dev, libkrb5-dev, libgpgme11-dev (= 1.1.1), libgtkhtml2-dev (= 2.6), libsynce0-dev, librapi2-dev, libnotify-dev, libytnef0-dev [...] Package libcurl-dev is a virtual package provided by: libcurl4-openssl-dev 7.18.2-5 libcurl4-gnutls-dev 7.18.2-5 You should explicitly select one to install. E: Package libcurl-dev has no installation candidate I wonder why that sbuild doesn't behave like others (pasted from ia64 log [0]): ,--- | Building dependency tree... | Package libcurl-dev is a virtual package provided by: | libcurl4-gnutls-dev 7.18.2-6 | libcurl4-openssl-dev 7.18.2-6 | You should explicitly select one to install. | E: Package libcurl-dev has no installation candidate | libcurl-dev is a virtual package provided by: libcurl4-gnutls-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev | Using libcurl4-gnutls-dev (no default, using first one) `--- Any reason? Anyway I think the right dependency is already provided by libetpan-dev, so this may be removed as well. Will take some time to fix, because it will pass through new queue (new plugin on this release). regards, [0] http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=claws-mail-extra-pluginsver=3.5.0-1arch=ia64stamp=1215793395file=log -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Too much is just enough. -- Mark Twain, on whiskey»
Bug#488996: mod_dav_svn.so: undefined symbol: svn_mergeinfo__remove_prefix_from_catalog
Package: libapache2-svn Version: 1.5.0dfsg1-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, After upgrading: # /etc/init.d/apache2 restart Restarting web server: apache2apache2: Syntax error on line 185 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Syntax error on line 2 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/dav_svn.load: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_dav_svn.so into server: /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_dav_svn.so: undefined symbol: svn_mergeinfo__remove_prefix_from_catalog failed! In case it's needed, line 185 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf reads: Include /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/*.load HTH and best regards, -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=es_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages libapache2-svn depends on: ii apache2.2-common2.2.9-2 Apache HTTP Server common files ii libc6 2.7-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libsvn1 1.4.6dfsg1-4 Shared libraries used by Subversio libapache2-svn recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#488996: mod_dav_svn.so: undefined symbol: svn_mergeinfo__remove_prefix_from_catalog
Hi Peter, On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 12:35:21 -0500 Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Ricardo Mones] /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/dav_svn.load: Cannot load /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_dav_svn.so into server: /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_dav_svn.so: undefined symbol: svn_mergeinfo__remove_prefix_from_catalog Upgrade libsvn1 to 1.5.0dfsg1-2 as well. I guess I forgot to ensure the dependency was tight enough. Yep, seems it has to be corrected because your suggestion fixed the issue. Many thanks for the quick and effective response. best regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones __Q: What do Winnie the Pooh and John the Baptist have in common? A: The same middle name.__ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#482542: sylpheed_2.5.0~rc0-1(unstable/sparc/lebrun): Missing build-dep on libaspell-dev
tags 482542 confirmed thanks Hi Marc, Sorry for the delay, but this week I'm moving house and hadn't internet in the new home until yesterday. On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: sylpheed Version: 2.5.0~rc0-1 Severity: serious Heya, Building your pkg failed on my buildd: | Automatic build of sylpheed_2.5.0~rc0-1 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98 | Build started at 20080523-1106 | ** [...] | cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\Sylpheed\ -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include -I../libsylph -DLOCALEDIR=\/usr/share/locale\ -DMANUALDIR=\/usr/share/doc/sylpheed-doc/manual\ -DFAQDIR=\/usr/share/doc/sylpheed-doc/FAQ\ -DTARGET_ALIAS=\sparc-unknown-linux-gnu\-DSYSCONFDIR=\/etc\ -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtkspell-2.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -c compose.c | compose.c:72:22: error: aspell.h: No such file or directory | compose.c: In function 'compose_set_spell_lang_menu': | compose.c:5737: error: 'AspellConfig' undeclared (first use in this function) | compose.c:5737: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once | compose.c:5737: error: for each function it appears in.) | compose.c:5737: error: 'config' undeclared (first use in this function) | compose.c:5738: error: 'AspellDictInfoList' undeclared (first use in this function) | compose.c:5738: error: 'dlist' undeclared (first use in this function) | compose.c:5739: error: 'AspellDictInfoEnumeration' undeclared (first use in this function) | compose.c:5739: error: 'dels' undeclared (first use in this function) | compose.c:5740: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '*' token | compose.c:5740: error: 'entry' undeclared (first use in this function) | compose.c:5745: warning: implicit declaration of function 'new_aspell_config' | compose.c:5746: warning: implicit declaration of function 'get_aspell_dict_info_list' | compose.c:5747: warning: implicit declaration of function 'delete_aspell_config' | compose.c:5749: warning: implicit declaration of function 'aspell_dict_info_list_elements' | compose.c:5750: warning: implicit declaration of function 'aspell_dict_info_enumeration_next' | compose.c:5756: warning: implicit declaration of function 'delete_aspell_dict_info_enumeration' | make[4]: *** [compose.o] Error 1 | make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/sylpheed-2.5.0~rc0/build-tree/sylpheed-2.5.0rc/src' | make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/sylpheed-2.5.0~rc0/build-tree/sylpheed-2.5.0rc/src' | make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/sylpheed-2.5.0~rc0/build-tree/sylpheed-2.5.0rc' | make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/sylpheed-2.5.0~rc0/build-tree/sylpheed-2.5.0rc' | make: *** [debian/stamp-makefile-build] Error 2 | dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2 | ** | Build finished at 20080523-1113 | FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] | Build needed 00:05:04, 32984k disk space A complete build log can be found at http://experimental.debian.net/build.php?arch=sparcpkg=sylpheedver=2.5.0~rc0-1 You are probably missing a libaspell-dev build-dep. Strange, but not, first: libaspell-dev should be pulled by libgtkspell-dev [0] which is already in Build-Depends, but this may be caused by an old version of libgtkspell-dev on your builder. Second: adding libaspell-dev explicitly doesn't fixes the bug either, but changes it to a linkage problem, so I'm suspecting a bug on libaspell rather than sylpheed. Still investigating though, but any help either as a patch or NMU is welcomed of course. best regards, [0] http://packages.debian.org/sid/libgtkspell-dev -- Ricardo Mones. ~ Never send a human to do a machine's job. -- Agent Smith -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#474712: severity of 474712 is important
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.20 # If you don't know what severities mean just leave it at normal, thanks. severity 474712 important -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#471421: Crashed while deleting multiple emails together
tags 471421 unreproducible thanks On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:17:49 +0530 Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: claws-mail Version: 3.3.1-1 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi, First of all, thanks for wonderful email client! Now, the real problem :) Claws mail is crashing many times when I try to select and then delete multiple emails together. It is not the case always but it happens once in a day for me. I have installed -debug package and attached backtrace produced by bug-buddy. Let me know what else can be provided so you will find exact problem(s) with this bug. Strange, I delete multiple mails multiple times every day and never observed such problem. Which kind of account is this? imap, pop3, local? Do you have inmmediate execution turned on or off? (Configuration/Preferences/View/Summaries) What other plugins do you have loaded? Did you observe any other particular situation when the crash happens? Like always in the same account or folder? regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Beware of a dark-haired man with a loud tie.» signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#470050: tagging 470050, usertagging 470050, usertagging 470050
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 tags 470050 confirmed usertags 470050 - intend-to-nmu # please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it usertags 470050 + remove-from-testing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#463369: tagging 463369, usertagging 463369, usertagging 463369
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 tags 463369 confirmed usertags 463369 - intend-to-nmu # please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it usertags 463369 + remove-from-testing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#470052: tagging 470052, usertagging 470052, usertagging 470052
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 tags 470052 confirmed usertags 470052 - intend-to-nmu # please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it usertags 470052 + remove-from-testing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#470051: tagging 470051, usertagging 470051, usertagging 470051
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 tags 470051 confirmed usertags 470051 - intend-to-nmu # please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it usertags 470051 + remove-from-testing -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#468664: claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops
tags 468664 unreproducible thanks On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:55:00 +0100 David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This happens also with a fresh configuration (still with 3.3.1). I'll try to reproduce with other versions. (I know my kernel is tainted -- see that G in the message I pasted before -- but I currently don't have any non-free module loaded. I'll investigate if this tainting might cause the Oops) As you see I'm running 3.3.1 in a i386 up-to-date chroot without problems. Have you tried to reinstall the package? Disk corruption happens and may have trashed some bytes on the binary. regards, -- Ricardo Mones http://people.debian.org/~mones «Never send a human to do a machine's job. -- Agent Smith»
Bug#465574: claws-mail-extra-plugins: FTBFS: vcalendar.c:547: error: too few arguments to function 'account_find_from_address'
tags 465574 pending thanks On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:49:07PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Package: claws-mail-extra-plugins Version: 3.2.0-2 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080212 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on i386 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386. 3.3.0-1 is in the NEW queue, and, obviously, fixes this :) regards, -- Ricardo Mones ~ Never send a human to do a machine's job. Agent Smith -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#462963: tagging 462963
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13 # clamav upstream will not relicense, so claws-mail upstream have relicense this plugin as GPLv2 or later and moved out of main tarball, will be distributed as an extra-plugin from next release tags 462963 fixed-upstream -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#462963: tagging 462963
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 # As there is a mix of GPLv2 and GPLv2+ licenses on clamav upstream source code, seems the intention was not to make this GPLv2 only per se, and maybe upstream is willing to have this fixed. tags 462963 confirmed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
