Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa, mips mipsel
* Thiemo Seufer [Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:11:43 +0100]: Mark Purcell wrote: On Wednesday 29 October 2008 04:06:20 Luca Bruno wrote: if the release team really sees this as an issue needing an immediate fix, I won't object to the choice (and if Thiemo is already there I won't be against a quick NMU targeting only #500418, as I'll probably be busy in the next few days). Luca, Thanks for response. Yes the release-team (pkern) have reaffirmed this as a release critical bug, so we do require resolution to get lenny released. Adding the additional archs shouldn't be high risk so if either you or Thiemo want to upload that would be best. I uploaded istanbul 0.2.2-4.1 which allows Architecture: any. Thanks, unblocked. -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Hay quien sueña con la alquimia que haga del vicio virtud -- Luis Eduardo Aute, Giraluna -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa, mips mipsel
Mark Purcell wrote: On Wednesday 29 October 2008 04:06:20 Luca Bruno wrote: if the release team really sees this as an issue needing an immediate fix, I won't object to the choice (and if Thiemo is already there I won't be against a quick NMU targeting only #500418, as I'll probably be busy in the next few days). Luca, Thanks for response. Yes the release-team (pkern) have reaffirmed this as a release critical bug, so we do require resolution to get lenny released. Adding the additional archs shouldn't be high risk so if either you or Thiemo want to upload that would be best. I uploaded istanbul 0.2.2-4.1 which allows Architecture: any. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa
severity 500418 important thanks On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:57:39 Thiemo Seufer wrote: severity 500418 serious [...] Please add hppa mips mipsel to the allowed architectures in debian/control. Thiemo, Whilst I agree is is important for hppa mips mipsel to be supported architectures I don't think the build of istanbul on these arches is release critical for lenny nor does it make the package unfit for release, given that the package already in lenny hasn't been build for these arches. However, if Luca or Florian are able to build/ upload a new package that would be welcome. However that shouldn't effect the severity of this bug report. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa
Mark, am Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 07:09:02PM +1100 hast du folgendes geschrieben: Whilst I agree is is important for hppa mips mipsel to be supported architectures I don't think the build of istanbul on these arches is release critical for lenny nor does it make the package unfit for release, given that the package already in lenny hasn't been build for these arches. there was a hppa build in etch which now isn't anymore. Policy 5.6.8 (`Architecture') footnote [2] says: [2] This is a setting used for a minority of cases where the program is not portable. Generally, it should not be used for new packages. Assuming that the package is in fact portable. The maintainer of the package worked around some buildd problem, obviously, albeit the infrasture ought to handle this failure gracefully: istanbul (0.2.2-3) unstable; urgency=low . [...] * Disabling those architectures where python-gst isn't available I.e. the packages would be available now that python-gst is there, too (through dep-wait). Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Release Assistant `. `' xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stable Release Manager `-finger pkern/[EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa
On Tuesday 28 October 2008 19:39:16 Philipp Kern wrote: The maintainer of the package worked around some buildd problem, Philipp, I agree. The question remains, is it RC, ie serious, or important for the maintainer to restore the missing archs - hppa mips mipsel. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa
severity 500418 serious thanks Mark Purcell wrote: severity 500418 important thanks On Tuesday 28 October 2008 10:57:39 Thiemo Seufer wrote: severity 500418 serious [...] Please add hppa mips mipsel to the allowed architectures in debian/control. Thiemo, Whilst I agree is is important for hppa mips mipsel to be supported architectures I don't think the build of istanbul on these arches is release critical for lenny nor does it make the package unfit for release, given that the package already in lenny hasn't been build for these arches. For hppa it is a regression over etch and therefore RC. However, if Luca or Florian are able to build/ upload a new package that would be welcome. However that shouldn't effect the severity of this bug report. I can do a NMU if they are short on time. (And iff the bugs remains flagged as RC, as Developer's Reference 5.10.2.2 recommends.) Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 500418 serious Bug#500418: Please re-enable istanbul builds on mips/mipsel Severity set to `serious' from `serious' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa
Thiemo Seufer scrisse: I can do a NMU if they are short on time. (And iff the bugs remains flagged as RC, as Developer's Reference 5.10.2.2 recommends.) Sorry for not replying early on this. My intention was to wait after lenny to fix both #500418 and 485301 at once. While the architecture drop was just a (ugly) workaround of mine to fix the symptoms of a toolchain bigger problem, I don't feel like an urgent upload at this point of lenny release cycle would be justified by the sole need of istanbul on mips* and hppa (ie. not stricly desktop oriented arch) given the stability of the current version in lenny. Please note that I'm not throwing mud at not-so-widespread arches (and I'm with you supporting all of them) and that I'll restore them for squeeze asap fixing the acknowledged regression; that said I wouldn't classify this bug as RC. I'm anyway just a man with my partial opinions, so if the release team really sees this as an issue needing an immediate fix, I won't object to the choice (and if Thiemo is already there I won't be against a quick NMU targeting only #500418, as I'll probably be busy in the next few days). Otherwise, if nobody speak up before 24h, I'll downgrade severity. Ciao, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso) : :' : The Universal O.S.| lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer pgpNd3D9UVz7z.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#500418: istanbul Please also re-enable hppa, mips mipsel
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 04:06:20 Luca Bruno wrote: if the release team really sees this as an issue needing an immediate fix, I won't object to the choice (and if Thiemo is already there I won't be against a quick NMU targeting only #500418, as I'll probably be busy in the next few days). Luca, Thanks for response. Yes the release-team (pkern) have reaffirmed this as a release critical bug, so we do require resolution to get lenny released. Adding the additional archs shouldn't be high risk so if either you or Thiemo want to upload that would be best. Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
