Bug#584942: Bug#583738: Bug#584942: by the way
But it still chokes on anything in color: D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] sfopen: gs_parse_file_name failed. D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] sfopen: gs_parse_file_name failed. D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] ./base/gsicc_manage.c:709: gsicc_open_search(): Could not find lab.icc D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] | ./psi/zusparam.c:805: set_lab_icc(): cannot find default lab icc profile D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] sfopen: gs_parse_file_name failed. D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] sfopen: gs_parse_file_name failed. D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] sfopen: gs_parse_file_name failed. D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] ./base/gsicc_manage.c:709: gsicc_open_search(): Could not find %rom%iccprofiles/default_rgb.icc D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] | ./base/gsicc_manage.c:869: gsicc_set_device_profile(): cannot find device profile D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] Unrecoverable error: unknownerror in .setdistillerparams D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] Operand stack: D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false --nostringval-- GrayAC SImageDict --nostringval-- GrayImageDepth -1 OffOptimizations 0 .AlwaysEmbed --nostringval-- SubsetFonts true CalGrayProfile None ColorACSImageDict --nostringval-- DownsampleGrayImages false UCRandBGInfo Preserve LockDistillerParams false PDFXSetBleedBoxToMedi aBox true AutoFilterColorImages true ColorImageFilter DCTEncode EmbedAllFonts true EncodeMonoImages true MonoImageFilter CCITTFax Encode CalCMYKProfile None DownsampleColorImages false PreserveOverprintSettings true ImageMemory 524288 PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffse t --nostringval-- ASCII85EncodePages false UsePrologue false ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.5 DoThumbnails false EncodeGrayImages true MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.5 sRGBProfile None CannotEmbedFontPolicy Warning DetectBlends true PreserveOPIComments true GrayImageFilter DCTEncode ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true AntiAliasMonoImage D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] s false UseFlateCompression true ColorImageDict --nostringval-- CreateJobTicket false EncodeColorImages true MonoImageDict --nostringval-- PreserveHalftoneInfo false Binding Left DefaultRenderingIntent Default PreserveEPSInfo true GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.5 ParseDSCComments true AntiAliasGrayImages false ColorImageDepth -1 EmitDSCWarnings false MonoImageDepth -1 PreserveCopyPage true AutoPositionEPSFiles true AutoRotatePages PageByPage ConvertImagesToIndexed true .NeverEmbed --nostringval-- GrayImageDict --nostringval-- Optimize false OPM 1 AntiAliasColorImages false TransferFunctionInfo Preserve CalRGBProfile None ColorConversionStrategy LeaveColorUnchanged DownsampleMonoImages false MaxSubsetPct 100 PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset --nostringval-- AutoFilterGrayImages true CompressPages true D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] sfopen: gs_parse_file_name failed. D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] sfopen: gs_parse_file_name failed. D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] ./base/gsicc_manage.c:709: gsicc_open_search(): Could not find lab.icc D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] cupsdReadClient: 17 GET /images/right.gif HTTP/1.1 D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] cupsdAuthorize: No authentication data provided. D [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] | ./psi/zusparam.c:805: set_lab_icc(): cannot find default lab icc profile I [22/Dec/2010:15:24:09 +0100] [Job 1700] Rendering completed ii ghostscript 9.00~dfsg-2~0jones1 The GPL Ghostscript PostScript/PDF interpreter Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584942: Bug#583738: Bug#584942: by the way
Found: 9.00~dfsg-2~0jones1 You posted above to my personal email address. Yes. Please repost to the bugreport - and only there. Thanks. I will not post publicly private data, sorry. But I'll send a mail that it's still won't work if you insist, without the attachments. Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584942: Bug#583738: Bug#584942: by the way
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 13:21, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: yeh the bug's still present, Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test? It would still be useful if you could answer above - even if you cannot test any further with different versions of ghostscript. Haven't I? :-) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583738#113 Please try the newest packaging as requested here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=78;att=0;bug=583738 I had hoped for help with above, as it is more reliable if those initially experiencing the bug could confirm that the bug has been properly solved. It has not. But there were other random crashes after installing it, and I haven't got the time to properly figure out where and why. command documentation) with the GTP-based evince-gtk works fine here, using ghostscript 9.00~dfsg-2. My versions were detailed in the msg above, and usually printing any pdf (from evince, from lpr, ...) results a crash. Converting it into .ps usually solves the problem. All versions are at jones1 and I've upgraded the whole system to sid last time just to see the random crashes to go, which they didn't. I'll try to test it further and reopen if I find some useful info, I unfortunately cannot figure out any useful I could add at this point apart from not working. :-( Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#584942: Bug#583738: Bug#584942: by the way
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:48:35PM +0100, Peter Gervai wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 13:21, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: yeh the bug's still present, Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test? It would still be useful if you could answer above - even if you cannot test any further with different versions of ghostscript. Haven't I? :-) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583738#113 Whoops, sorry! Please try the newest packaging as requested here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=78;att=0;bug=583738 I had hoped for help with above, as it is more reliable if those initially experiencing the bug could confirm that the bug has been properly solved. It has not. But there were other random crashes after installing it, and I haven't got the time to properly figure out where and why. command documentation) with the GTP-based evince-gtk works fine here, using ghostscript 9.00~dfsg-2. My versions were detailed in the msg above, and usually printing any pdf (from evince, from lpr, ...) results a crash. Converting it into .ps usually solves the problem. All versions are at jones1 and I've upgraded the whole system to sid last time just to see the random crashes to go, which they didn't. I'll try to test it further and reopen if I find some useful info, I unfortunately cannot figure out any useful I could add at this point apart from not working. :-( Having an actual file available + the crashing gs command that I can test would be awesome. Try follow this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingPrintingProblems - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#583738: Bug#575798: Bug#584942: by the way
Hi, On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test? Please try the newest packaging as requested here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=78;att=0;bug=583738 I can only see ghostscript 9.0 packages there, and I fear^wthink the release team wont accept those for squeeze - whats your plan to fix printing in squeeze? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#583738: Bug#575798: Bug#584942: by the way
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:34:42AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test? Please try the newest packaging as requested here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=78;att=0;bug=583738 I can only see ghostscript 9.0 packages there, and I fear^wthink the release team wont accept those for squeeze - whats your plan to fix printing in squeeze? Please see here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=44;att=0;bug=584653 and here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=59;att=0;bug=584653 Both are recent entries of one of the three merged bugreports you are replying to - would be nicer if you read before asking, but thanks for the question anyway. Regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#583738: Bug#575798: Bug#584942: by the way
Hi, On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Please see here: [...] Both are recent entries of one of the three merged bugreports you are replying to - would be nicer if you read before asking, but thanks for the question anyway. Thanks for assuming I havent read those URLs you refered too. I actually did. And thats why I send that mail. Thanks for confirming that appearantly there are no plans to fix ghostscript 8.x in squeeze. That was what I was asking for, sorry if I wasnt clear. cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#584942: Bug#583738: Bug#575798: Bug#584942: by the way
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 03:59:06PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: On Montag, 15. November 2010, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Please see here: [...] Both are recent entries of one of the three merged bugreports you are replying to - would be nicer if you read before asking, but thanks for the question anyway. Thanks for assuming I havent read those URLs you refered too. I actually did. And thats why I send that mail. Thanks for confirming that appearantly there are no plans to fix ghostscript 8.x in squeeze. That was what I was asking for, sorry if I wasnt clear. Awesome. You are clever. And helpful! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#584942: by the way
yeh the bug's still present, and isn't it the same as bug #569580 ? -- byte-byte, grin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#575798: Bug#584942: by the way
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 06:39:42PM +0100, Peter Gervai wrote: yeh the bug's still present, Still present where? With which version of ghostscript did you test? Please try the newest packaging as requested here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=78;att=0;bug=583738 If possible try both against an up-to-date squeeze system and an up-to-date sid system - to figure out if really the bug might be triggered by something else (e.g. CUPS) rather than ghostscript itself. and isn't it the same as bug #569580 ? That bug seems (from quickly skimming it) to not be tied to the use of GNOME applications, and possibly also occur in a different CUPS helper than the one provided with ghostscript. I suggest you try ask that question in that bugreport, to help the CUPS maintainers verify if really the bugs are the same. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private signature.asc Description: Digital signature
