Re: A common configuration format, anyone?

2012-11-14 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mittwoch, 14. November 2012, Игорь Пашев wrote:
 XML is not human-readable :-)

either, 
you have not seen good XML, or
you are not human, or
you cannot read.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201211141310.41707.hol...@layer-acht.org



Re: A common configuration format, anyone?

2012-11-14 Thread Enrico Zini
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 01:10:41PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:

 On Mittwoch, 14. November 2012, Игорь Пашев wrote:
  XML is not human-readable :-)
 either, 
   you have not seen good XML, or
   you are not human, or
   you cannot read.

I assume that you are defining good XML as XML that is human
readable: am I right? :)


Ciao,

Enrico

-- 
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: A common configuration format, anyone?

2012-11-14 Thread Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org writes:

 On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 01:10:41PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:

 On Mittwoch, 14. November 2012, Игорь Пашев wrote:
  XML is not human-readable :-)
 either, 
  you have not seen good XML, or
  you are not human, or
  you cannot read.

 I assume that you are defining good XML as XML that is human
 readable: am I right? :)

Tautological definition is best definition.

-- 
I use RMS as a guide in the same way that a boat captain would use
 a lighthouse.  It's good to know where it is, but you generally
 don't want to find yourself in the same spot. - Tollef Fog Heen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/d8j6258fjg4@dalvik.ping.uio.no



Re: A common configuration format, anyone?

2012-11-14 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Holger Levsen 

 On Mittwoch, 14. November 2012, Игорь Пашев wrote:
  XML is not human-readable :-)
 
 either, 
   you have not seen good XML, or
   you are not human, or
   you cannot read.

or he just has standards than you for what is considered readable.

readable is more than anything that can be deciphered.

-- 
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/876258cpb4@qurzaw.varnish-software.com



Re: A common configuration format, anyone?

2012-11-14 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no, 2012-11-14, 14:00:

XML is not human-readable :-)

either,
you have not seen good XML, or
you are not human, or
you cannot read.


or he just has standards than you for what is considered readable.

readable is more than anything that can be deciphered.


E.g. if you swallow a word your sentence, it can be deciphered, but it's 
not very readable.


--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121114131453.gb9...@jwilk.net



Re: A common configuration format, anyone?

2012-11-14 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Holger Levsen dijo [Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 01:10:41PM +0100]:
 On Mittwoch, 14. November 2012, Игорь Пашев wrote:
  XML is not human-readable :-)
 
 either, 
   you have not seen good XML, or
   you are not human, or
   you cannot read.

No, Holger, you are really mistaken! XML is clearly a non-modifiable,
one-way-encrypted way of storing information. Or so seems to think
Luis Eduardo Bastías in a newspaper opinion article that really made
me laugh last week:

http://www.latercera.com/noticia/opinion/correos-de-los-lectores/2012/11/896-492551-9-elecciones-y-voto-electronico.shtml

Partial translation,

While it is true that infallible systems do no exist, which means
that errors and delays are unavoidable, they can be drastically
reduced if we simplify and automatize our election processes by
the way of the electronic vote.

For that, it is advisable that each individual vote is stored as a
XML file, to fully satisfy the requirements established in
D.S. No. 81 dated in 2004 and its modifications. This way we will
guarantee that each vote will be stored in its original format,
corresponding to an electronic document, and among other things
will be ready for review when needed.

Did I say that the author signs as informatic civil engineer? He
clearly knows how to build XML structures in cement.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121114153328.ga...@gwolf.org