DM upload permission question
Hi there, I am trying to give Sven Eckelmann dm upload permission on exactimage. Here what I did 1. read [1] 2. write a text file: $ cat malat-1.dak-commands Archive: ftp.debian.org Uploader: Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org Action: dm Fingerprint: 522D7163831C73A635D12FE5EC371482956781AF Allow: exactimage Then $ gpg --clearsign malat-1.dak-commands $ mv malat-1.dak-commands.asc malat-1.dak-commands $ ftp ftp.upload.debian.org ftp cd pub/UploadQueue ftp put malat-1.dak-commands local: malat-1.dak-commands remote: malat-1.dak-commands 200 PORT command successful. Consider using PASV. 150 Ok to send data. 226 Transfer complete. 1037 bytes sent in 0.00 secs (34920.5 kB/s) ftp 421 Timeout. Even if the file disapear from ftp.u.d.o I have not received any confirmation. What did I miss ? - BTW, I cannot use dput-ng from an oldstable system (need python = 2.7). If I run dput-ng from my sid schroot all I can get is: $ dcut dm --uid Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org --allow exactimage Uploading commands file to ftp.upload.debian.org (incoming: /pub/UploadQueue/) Picking DM Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org with fingerprint 522D7163831C73A635D12FE5EC371482956781AF [Errno 2] No such file or directory Thanks, [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg8.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ca+7wuswj5tkoj+xizqiyzfmgzdlhsxhpp-vcbevgbh-xkr8...@mail.gmail.com
Re: DM upload permission question
Hi, On 01.06.2013 16:56, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Uploader: Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org Uploader is you, not uploader as in person you want to grant upload rights. That's also used for mail confirmation I believe. Having that said, I'm no ftpmaster so I don't know what precisely went wrong (or if it worked nonetheless, and dm.txt just wasn't updated yet). $ dcut dm --uid Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org --allow exactimage Uploading commands file to ftp.upload.debian.org (incoming: /pub/UploadQueue/) Picking DM Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org with fingerprint 522D7163831C73A635D12FE5EC371482956781AF [Errno 2] No such file or directory This is fixed in git, see #709831. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: DM upload permission
Paul Wise: Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less dashes in the interface too. dm Tobias Stefan Richter allow foo bar , deny baz Others have produced other objections, but I would object to the use of a two-character command name for this. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20797.53584.90314.986...@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Re: DM upload permission
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 08:13 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise: On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Arno Töll wrote: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less dashes in the interface too. dm Tobias Stefan Richter allow foo bar , deny baz IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into devscripts. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1362571232.3536.0.camel@deep-thought
Re: DM upload permission
Hi, On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less dashes in the interface too. IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into devscripts. why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in devscripts. Whats your reasoning not to? cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303061346.07814.hol...@layer-acht.org
Re: DM upload permission
On Mar 6, 2013 7:46 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote: Hi, On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less dashes in the interface too. IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into devscripts. why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in devscripts. Whats your reasoning not to? Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git in-place cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303061346.07814.hol...@layer-acht.org
Re: DM upload permission
On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git in-place your point being? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303061408.55339.hol...@layer-acht.org
Re: DM upload permission
On Mar 6, 2013 8:09 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote: On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git in-place your point being? If you don't want to, you don't have to purge the old dput, as you seemed concerned about using dput-ng as a black and white issue. My comments have nothing to do with merging dput-ng into devscripts -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201303061408.55339.hol...@layer-acht.org
Re: DM upload permission
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 14:08 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git in-place your point being? I guess the point is that you can use dput-ng even if you don't want to replace your legacy dput installation just yet. -- Wolodja deb...@babilen5.org 4096R/CAF14EFC 081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA 36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: DM upload permission
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into devscripts. why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in devscripts. Whats your reasoning not to? It's up to people interested dcut(classic) to support this use case. If you like dcut(classic) better than dcut-ng, you may wish to implement this feature. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mnh6ihjpdfnn8lo0zbsk2mpkt-uvl1x3t_up_usa5b...@mail.gmail.com
Re: DM upload permission
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Holger Levsen wrote: IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into devscripts. why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in devscripts. Whats your reasoning not to? It's up to people interested dcut(classic) to support this use case. If you like dcut(classic) better than dcut-ng, you may wish to implement this feature. Of course s/cut/put/g. Best wishes, MIke -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MN+deEy=5owr-cjxtfs8ssctwb8oabqhaupqpoyjbw...@mail.gmail.com
Re: DM upload permission
Hi, On 06.03.2013 13:46, Holger Levsen wrote: On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less dashes in the interface too. IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into devscripts. why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in devscripts. Whats your reasoning not to? As algernon said there is also yodack [1] written by him doing a similar job. Contrary to our DM implementation it is written in more self-sufficient bash script and was meant to inclusion into devscripts, last I heard. I don't know what the current status is on that matter though. [1] https://github.com/algernon/yodack -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: DM upload permission
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 18:03 +0100 schrieb Arno Töll: Hi, On 06.03.2013 13:46, Holger Levsen wrote: On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less dashes in the interface too. IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into devscripts. why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in devscripts. Whats your reasoning not to? As algernon said there is also yodack [1] written by him doing a similar job. Contrary to our DM implementation it is written in more self-sufficient bash script and was meant to inclusion into devscripts, last I heard. I don't know what the current status is on that matter though. yodack was dropped in favor of dcut from dput-ng. See bug #688319 for details. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1362593384.25591.2.camel@deep-thought
Re: DM upload permission
Am Mittwoch, den 06.03.2013, 13:46 +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen: Hi, On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Benjamin Drung wrote: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less dashes in the interface too. IMO it's better to leave it in dput-ng and not moving it into devscripts. why? I don't want dput-ng (yet?) but I'd like to have a dm command in devscripts. Whats your reasoning not to? I don't want to duplicate code. -- Benjamin Drung Debian Ubuntu Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1362605150.25591.7.camel@deep-thought
Re: DM upload permission
Hi, 2013/3/5 Arno Töll a...@debian.org: Ho Carlo, On 05.03.2013 07:42, Carlo Segre wrote: 1. made a file called segre-0001.dak-commands with the following contents Action: dm Fingerprint: 8CCC1BA8590FF029D17C708FC1BCD3C72AA28B6B Allow: nexus You missed the header. While the Uploader field is optional (and also used for the mail confirmation you're missing by the way), the Archive field is not. Moreover, the blank newline dividing the header from the data part is required. That is, your command would be: --- Archive: ftp.debian.org Uploader: Carlo Segre se...@iit.edu Action: dm Fingerprint: 8CCC1BA8590FF029D17C708FC1BCD3C72AA28B6B Allow: nexus --- Note, you can also use dput-ng (available in unstable) to manage DM permissions. The equivalent command would be: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus Please send error reports to the affected parties when executing or parsing a dak command file fails. Also please send emails when a DM without proper upload rights set uploads a package and it is dropped. Yes, it happened to me and the wireshark package got stuck in the upload queue for a few hours and then it got dropped without any email sent to me about the reason. Thanks, Balint -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAK0Odpyv-ntOnwT=2mum5itxrhbycfxs3yeenongxhc8piq...@mail.gmail.com
Re: DM upload permission
On 03/05/2013 11:46, Bálint Réczey wrote: Please send error reports to the affected parties when executing or parsing a dak command file fails. If you meet minimum requirements, dak will send an error message. But dak and debianqueued only look at files that have a known extension (e.g. *.dak-commands, but not *.asc) and have a valid signature from a key in one of the keyrings. Also please send emails when a DM without proper upload rights set uploads a package and it is dropped. That happens too, with the same restrictions as above. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/513627bf.2060...@debian.org
Re: DM upload permission
Hi Arno: On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Arno Töll wrote: You missed the header. While the Uploader field is optional (and also used for the mail confirmation you're missing by the way), the Archive field is not. Moreover, the blank newline dividing the header from the data part is required. That is, your command would be: --- Archive: ftp.debian.org Uploader: Carlo Segre se...@iit.edu Action: dm Fingerprint: 8CCC1BA8590FF029D17C708FC1BCD3C72AA28B6B Allow: nexus --- Thanks, this is very helpful Note, you can also use dput-ng (available in unstable) to manage DM permissions. The equivalent command would be: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus I'll try this too carlo -- Carlo U. Segre -- Duchossois Leadership Professor of Physics Director, Center for Synchrotron Radiation Research and Instrumentation Illinois Institute of Technology Voice: 312.567.3498Fax: 312.567.3494 se...@iit.edu http://phys.iit.edu/~segre se...@debian.org
Re: DM upload permission
Note, you can also use dput-ng (available in unstable) to manage DM permissions. The equivalent command would be: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus I have had good luck with yodack to set DM permission as well: https://github.com/algernon/yodack Cheers, tony signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: DM upload permission
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Arno Töll wrote: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less dashes in the interface too. dm Tobias Stefan Richter allow foo bar , deny baz -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6F0SRAdrfA9O1cH==kbtiauujowow+e8qbphviefg8...@mail.gmail.com
Re: DM upload permission
Hi Paul, On 06.03.2013 01:13, Paul Wise wrote: On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Arno Töll wrote: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus Could this be moved to devscripts as a dm command? Maybe with less dashes in the interface too. the command is part of our dcut (Debian command upload tool) reimplementation, which is and always was part of dput. It does not only manage DM permissions but all commands dak and debianqueued understands (dcut cancel|rm|dm|reschedule|break-the-archive and whatever Ansgar invents in future). We could move it to devscripts, but honestly I think it's better suited to be part of dput(-ng). But if you all think it would be a good idea to move it there, be it. But note, it uses large parts of the dput code base, e.g. uploader classes and would bring almost all of its Python dependencies. I am not sure if that's desirable. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
DM upload permission
Hello All: I have been a sponsor for a DM's uploads of the nexus package and we have come across a new policy which defines a way of giving permission to a DM for a specific package. http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg8.html I have studied the above thread and any related posts I could find and attempted to follow the instructions therein. unfortunately, the examples given don't seem to be complete and my attempt to provide authorization for the nexus package did not seem to work (neither I nor the DM got any email confirmation). Is there any more explicit instruction on how to initiate this process correctly? Here is what I tried: 1. made a file called segre-0001.dak-commands with the following contents Action: dm Fingerprint: 8CCC1BA8590FF029D17C708FC1BCD3C72AA28B6B Allow: nexus 2. signed this file with my key and produced an ASCII file using gpg --clearsign segre-0001.dak-commands 3. uploaded the file to ftp-master using dput segre-0001.dak-commands.asc Clearly, I must have done at least one thing wrong, probably more than one so I would appreciate advice from anyone who has sucessfully navigated this process. Cheers, Carlo -- Carlo U. Segre -- Duchossois Leadership Professor of Physics Director, Center for Synchrotron Radiation Research and Instrumentation Illinois Institute of Technology Voice: 312.567.3498Fax: 312.567.3494 se...@iit.edu http://phys.iit.edu/~segre se...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.2.02.1303050032520.6...@hydride.phys.iit.edu
Re: DM upload permission
Ho Carlo, On 05.03.2013 07:42, Carlo Segre wrote: 1. made a file called segre-0001.dak-commands with the following contents Action: dm Fingerprint: 8CCC1BA8590FF029D17C708FC1BCD3C72AA28B6B Allow: nexus You missed the header. While the Uploader field is optional (and also used for the mail confirmation you're missing by the way), the Archive field is not. Moreover, the blank newline dividing the header from the data part is required. That is, your command would be: --- Archive: ftp.debian.org Uploader: Carlo Segre se...@iit.edu Action: dm Fingerprint: 8CCC1BA8590FF029D17C708FC1BCD3C72AA28B6B Allow: nexus --- Note, you can also use dput-ng (available in unstable) to manage DM permissions. The equivalent command would be: dcut dm --uid Tobias Stefan Richter --allow nexus -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
